*device *be removed from
> IODF", I should have stated to have "... the NIP *CONSOLE* be removed from
> IODF".
> Yes, the device should be defined to allow CONSOLxx to make use of it once
> MVS has been initialized, but an IODF defined NIP CONSOLE is not
> requ
> On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 04:31:33 PM PDT, Grant Taylor wrote:
>> On 7/26/23 2:18 PM, Jon Perryman wrote:
>> The order should not matter in my opinion. z/OS TCP has a lot more
>> features than TCP on other platforms.
> Would you please elaborate on that state
> On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:13:52 AM PDT, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
> not sure if I can change this order of not, because it displays differently
>with just HOMETEST
Take this with a grain of salt because it's been a long time. The order should
not matter in my opinion. z/OS TCP has a lot
console in its absence.
Maybe you're saying the same thing, just in VM speak?!
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:43 AM Jon Perryman wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 08:25:34 PM PDT, Steve Horein <
> steve.hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The only time I have seen NIP mess
> On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 12:50:53 PM PDT, Tom Longfellow
> <03e29b607131-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> If I was talking Linux I would look around.
z/OS Unix can use any open source syslog processor. SYSLOGD is distributed with
most flavors Unix and Linux. I'm just saying th
ablement (this one for a z15)
I've been told this is needed for TPF console processing, although I
don't know the details. 8P2980 costs money so it's not configured on
machines we work with that don't run TPF.
On 7/25/2023 12:03 PM, Jon Perryman wrote:
> > Phil w
5" means create device address 009 and all data
received is forwarded to CP to be displayed by CP and commands returned to 009.
Do you consider that CMS interacting with a console or a terminal. In z/OS, we
have TSO which does the same thing but we call it a terminal instead of
console.
> Phil wrote: What does "not supported" mean per se?
The last 3215 connected to IBM computers using an ICA. IBM z computers do not
have an ICA nor byte channel therefore not supported on a z16. I suspect you
can't even define one in the HCD. What was the last IBM computer to have an
ICA.
> O'n Monday, July 24, 2023 at 10:07:48 AM PDT, Seymour J Metz
> wrote:
> Do you have the URL for the Tracy Dean paper? Does it spell out all the
> pieces? While I'm not familiar with this paper, it's unlikely it solves
> Phil's problem. Phil can skip this because it's for the z/OS people.
> On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 09:31:24 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
> wrote: > That looks like the result of CP, HCD and MCS not specifying the
> same device type.
> What happens if all three are 3215? What happens if all three are 3270?
> Please stop letting Seymour drag everyone down a rabbit h
> On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 07:03:40 AM PDT, Tom Longfellow wrote:
> It turns out that the core of my problem was my interpretation of a few
> 'quirks' in syslog defining.
SYSLOGD does not solve every syslog problem thus you will find over a dozen
alternatives. I'm not recommending what to u
> On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 08:25:34 PM PDT, Steve Horein
> wrote:
> The only time I have seen NIP messages (those messages prior to VARY
> CN(*),ACTIVATE being accepted) on a native MVS LPAR was when the NIP device
Hi Phil, Sorry for the long delay.but I had other things to do. Steve may
> On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 04:28:48 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
> wrote:
> Your not keeping your MVS and VM in synch; 3E1 should be a 3215 on both or a
> 3270 on both.
Some devices must be in synch (e.g. disk drives). On the other hand, some
devices are very flexible. z/VM CONSOLE has nothing
Hi Phil, I have some good news and bad news.
> Well, this is interesting. Tried again just now with TERMINAL CONMODE 3215.
> The only weirdness is that much of the output is oddly formatted.
> B- *10.09.46 *CBR3002E Library LATL00 no longer u
> sable.
Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Phil Smith III [li...@akphs.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2023 6:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Ignorant z/OS question
Jon Perryman wrote:
>I need you to stop overthinking z/OS console. It's become very simple
>s
I
wrote:
(Wow, this thread is getting long! Sorry about that)
Jon Perryman is still endeavoring to help me, which is appreciated:
>The DEFINE GRAF did nothing useful. SECUID is associated with the VM
>user's CONSOLE definition. If you look at the z/OS syslog, you will
>find
s virtual HWCI. You said
that z/OS messages were displayed when IPL'd by logging onto the z/OS VM user.
z/OS messages were coming through the VM CONSOLE definition address or through
a virtual HWCI. Virtual HWCI might be a possibility because I think it was the
one exception to issu
> CP SEND CP ETPGZ1D DEFINE GRAF FFF
> CP SEND CP ETPGZ1D VINPUT VMSG VARY CN(*),ACT
> I do wonder if this will Just Work at IPL time
The DEFINE GRAF did nothing useful. SECUID is associated with the VM user's
CONSOLE definition. If you look at the z/OS syslog, you will find the V
CN(*),ACT did
d to
see if message are queueing up.
As a suggestion, get it working with a CMS user and a looping REXX exec. Once
that's working, z/OS should work the same.
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 08:40:44 PM PDT, Phil Smith III
wrote:
Jon Perryman kindly offered more thoughts. I've bee
*ALL
S0W103E1 MCS ACT-S0W1 *ALL *ALL
Does this tell us anything?
Jon Perryman: No, not PROP. PROP uses SECUSER output, and that's what's not
showing up.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
> I looked at description of IEFSSREQ
> Didnt see if it can be used in SRB mode
In theory and for the most part, IEFSSREQ can be used in SRB mode. Each
subsystem can process any functions it chooses. I suspect that all reputable
subsystems would make themselves SRB compatible. If you choose a
> console traffic doesn't come across a SECUSER
It's been a lot of years but I think you are talking about PROP. Do a search
for VM PROGRAMMABLE OPERATOR and you will find information about setting it up.
You may not even need PROP but it will tell you how to get messages from a VM
guest and s
ge mass.
Oh, and each of those 32 four-frame machines would need 8 60A 3Ph power
cables. Wow!
On 7/19/2023 6:09 PM, Jon Perryman wrote:
>
>> What a BS 'survey'
>
>
> What is it you consider to be BS? Are you saying that the hardware numbers
> are wrong? An IBM z
y 19, 2023 at 04:06:14 PM PDT, Tom Marchant
<000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 18:54:04 +, Jon Perryman wrote:
>
>> You didn't bother to cite any reference, so I am highly skeptical.
>> I looked for this "announcem
kins
<032966e74d0f-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
What a BS 'survey'.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon
Perryman
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 7:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Will z/OS be obsolete in 5 year
, but I doubt it.
> > >
> > > > USS becomes LSS. zOS native containers are actually normal containers
> > > > that you see in the linux world.
> > > > DSFS and zCX end up helping to blur the boundaries between zOS and LSS.
> > >
> > >
dependance on the other 31 boxes.
In theory, 6,400 cores have full access to the database instead of 200 cores
available to a single z16 Max200.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 09:09:00 AM PDT, Tom Marchant
<000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2
IBM RHEL announced it's move to closed source (IBM RedHat Enterprise Linux).
With some changes, DB2, RACF and other z/OS products could run in Linux on z16
in one sysplexed Linux image. We know it's possible because IBM moved Unix and
TCP into z/OS. IBM RHEL said closed source would force non-pa
at contains the base address and use that in a
range parm.
That might help narrow down the SLIP and not have to watch the whole
address space.
Chuck
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:59 PM Jon Perryman wrote:
> The SLIP I recommended was to capture the system trace which will not
> solve your
am
terminates would be at all helpful, but I am not an expert in that area either.
Again, thanks for trying to help.
Peter
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon
Perryman
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2023 11:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to set a
As you discovered, S0C4 SLIPs are at the best of times a pain in the a$$. S0C4
is difficult because it has a real use which is to determine if a page has been
created (not just allocated). It requires multiple SLIP IGNORE which can be
obtained from IBM. Since you are working with IBM support, I
.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 06:05:24 PM PDT, Tom Brennan
wrote:
On 7/14/2023 3:01 PM, Jon Perryman wrote:
> As for batch running slower at night after you went from 1 CPU to 4,
that doesn't make sense unless other things changed.
I'm thinking it could be as simple as say, goi
Every address space has multiple TCB. Only TCBs that are not in a wait
(dispatchable) are eligible to run on separate CPUs. You are correct but all
TCBs in a wait are not eligible to run.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 05:56:58 PM PDT, Brian Westerman
wrote:
I'm pretty sure that each TC
I've never looked at IXGLOGR address space but my guess is that IXGLOGR would
have multiple tasks (TCB's) running at the same time if there are multiple logs
active.
As for batch running slower at night after you went from 1 CPU to 4, that
doesn't make sense unless other things changed. SRM di
On Monday, May 18, 2020, 05:49:43 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
wrote: >> Messages in z/OS do not wrap and are not formatted.
> In the nextt paragraph you say the opposite.
It's not the opposite. Consol address space builds a line that is destination
dependent. Compare the same message in syslog vers
On Monday, May 18, 2020, 10:18:10 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
> Is there optional source code for any IBM software announced or released
> after May, 1999? > I didn't see anything there that related to permissible
> and impermissible use of source code.
Macro's are source. I'm not a la
Generic response time monitoring for TCP is not possible. You need to set
expectations based on the monitors you decide to use.
To understand the problem, think about what is considered a delay. TN3270
delays are clearly defined (press enter to screen returned). The Unix
equivalent is telnet w
https://www-03.ibm.com/software/sla/sladb.nsf/sla/home?OpenDocument
Jon.On Monday, May 18, 2020, 07:54:19 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
Does anybody have an announcement or other document that I can cite for "The
source code is covered by a non-disclosure agreement or a license that
Messages in z/OS do not wrap and are not formatted. Messages are written using
either WTO (single message) or MLWTO (multiple lines of a message). WTO allows
you to write a single message which I think has a max length of somewhere
around 128 bytes. Multi-line messages are multiple MLWTO's (one
On Wednesday, November 27, 2019, 08:20:47 AM PST, scott Ford
wrote:
> My big issue I was at the mercy of CA code. Not blaming them,
> but it’s a CA product and I wished their doc was better.
If you are talking about the security exit samples, then they accomplished the
desired results by
On Wednesday, November 27, 2019, 04:39:07 AM PST, John McKown
wrote:
> Total agreement that it is bad form in today's world. For subsystems, there
> is the SSCT to anchor things. And, as I do for my re-entrant code: a
> Name/Token pair (primary address space level) to hold a 64-bit pointer
On Thursday, November 21, 2019, 12:36:17 PM PST, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
> As ITschak Mugzach wrote, "Try get who enqueues ADMSYMBL dataset,
>or any other commonly (but centrally) used dataset which is outside the
>linklist
> or lpalist." Just remember that there may be users of GDDM who a
On Monday, November 25, 2019, 05:13:35 AM PST, Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> Where in 31 bit mode you are able to get 31 bit ( private ) storage in a
> other address space > via the ALET parameter on the STORAGE macro this is
> not true for 64 bit storage
OWNER= is only valid with COMMO
On Monday, November 25, 2019, 05:13:35 AM PST, Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> Where in 31 bit mode you are able to get 31 bit ( private ) storage in a
> other address space via the ALET parameter on the STORAGE macro this is not
> true for 64 bit storage
--
On Monday, November 18, 2019, 05:56:09 AM PST, scott Ford
wrote:
> My chief complaint is samples.
> I spend a lot of time digging for examples.
> Working examples which I can refer to and understand
> (prototype) before I start writing code.
CBTTAPE.ORG has tons of real world code
> On Monday, November 25, 2019, 01:19:47 AM PST, David Crayford
wrote:
> That's interesting! You said the exit was re-entrant so how is it
> obtaining the working storage. If it's doing a GETMAIN why don't you
> just increase the size
> of the storage. Why do you have a constraint
On Sunday, November 3, 2019, 01:42:10 AM PDT, Peter
wrote:
> Is there a way to write WTO even if the previous step ends in JCL error ?
Sorry but I don't know of an easy method to capture JCL error, dataset not
found or ???. MPF exit for various messages will probably be the easiest.
Str
On Sunday, November 3, 2019, 05:38:02 AM PST, Peter Relson
wrote:
> all other things being equal, ready tasks within in address space are >
> dispatched in a round-robin fashion. A time slice is a time slice.
Enclaves were supposed to be an exception to this rule. First, SRB's in an
On Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 08:52:22 AM PDT, Sean Gleann
wrote:
> If I try to ADDSD 'ABC.DEF' UACC(NONE), I get "ICH09006I USER OR GROUP
> ABC NOT DEFINED TO RACF"
I believe the error message is complaining about the OWNER which is defaulting
to ABC. Specify OWNER(xxx) wher
On Saturday, November 2, 2019, 07:35:08 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> Sorry. I forgot to say EXEC PGM=AOPBATCH is safe.
> That might be true if AOPBATCH were installed with AC=0 in an authorized
> library.
AOPBATCH and COZBATCH must be linked AC=0 because the shell runs in problem
st
> Is there a WTO module which can write a message (highlight message) on a
> console based on the JCL previous condition code?
I believe you are asking about the sample exit IEFACTRT on the CBTTAPE which
issues a WTO for each step completion message. You can change this to issue the
message a
On Saturday, November 2, 2019, 12:38:38 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> Doesn't any program object invoked by // EXEC PGM= execute in the initiator's
> address space?
Sorry. I forgot to say EXEC PGM=AOPBATCH is safe.
> Is there the same exposure for any user-coded program that uses LINK
On Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 05:50:04 AM PDT, Peter Relson
wrote:
,> If the two parties are running in different address spaces then a
> complaint could only be that the address space is consuming a lot of CPU
> and that is exactly what WLM goals and priorities are for.
Only true if y
On Tuesday, October 29, 2019, 01:45:18 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Oh, my. True Blue!
> AOPBATCH removes that limitation and introduces no new limitations (AFAIK?)
> Are you arguing for a semantic distinction between "fixing a problem" a
On Sunday, October 6, 2019, 08:14:36 PM PDT, David Crayford
wrote:
>On 2019-10-07 2:06 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
>> I'm saying that IBM can't fix this problem because the problem lies with
>> Unix shell design.
> IBM can and have fixed the problem! BPX
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:23:31 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>The Dispatcher has been using timers for decades. What interrupts your
>code is an external event from a timer or from a SIGP on another CPU.
>If you're running with appropriate goals, don't try to second guess WLM.
I believe the OP m
You can easily send a small assembler program that issues this racroute stat
and issue WTO TEXT= to display the results. Don't bother converting hex to
display format in the WTO. WTO doesn't care if you include hex data in the
message text. Use SDSF SE (Select Edit) for the joblog and turn hex
The CALL macro supports 32 and 64 bit parm addresses. I believe it defaults to
32 bit and the SYSSTATE macro is used to change it. Does CELQPITY require 64
bit parm list? If so, make sure you have SYSSTATE prior to the call. Also make
sure SYSSTATE is before the CALL MF=L.
I've never used TEST
oduction where operations makes changes that could easily be error prone and
difficult for those with less experience.
Jon.
On Sunday, October 6, 2019, 12:10:09 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 18:06:16 +, Jon Perryma
tionally, there are many shells available. All shells support passing a
single line of commands which is the interface designed specifically for
situations such as BPXBATCH. Sadly, shell design doesn't give us the best
solution.
Jon.
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 1:35 PM Jon Perryman wrote:
&
In the future, you can easily help yourself by looking at the JCL expansion
which has statement numbers and formatted output. The error message points you
to the specific statement in error.
Jon.
On Saturday, October 5, 2019, 04:11:24 PM PDT, Rich Tabor
wrote:
//Val1 label has lowe
Since no one else is answering this, I'll make a really wild guess without any
real substance. I can't believe that IBM would default to SMF Signature
Validation enabled. Are there supposed to be SMF parm changes? Did you meet the
software and hardware requirements for this feature?
Jon.
On
On Saturday, October 5, 2019, 09:37:54 AM PDT, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
> If you have a handful of users you can't cancel, use FORCE U=. It's
> messy, but the pain will (most likely) be short lived.
Use FORCE with great caution and realize that you could damage something or
require a
On Saturday, October 5, 2019, 01:44:14 AM PDT, ITschak Mugzach
wrote:
>You can't. Instead of rename, allocate a new one, copy into the current one
> and update the tso proc with the new name. A they later you'll be able to
> delete the old one.
If this is a non-sms dataset, then you can un
On Saturday, October 5, 2019, 08:53:07 AM PDT, Charles Mills
wrote:
> I was assuming (yes, I know) that the OP wanted realtime notification of the
> OPEN,
> based on the mention of exits.
> If not, SMF14OPE is pretty good. It gives the time but not the date, which is
> kind of half an ans
On Wednesday, October 2, 2019, 12:52:56 PM PDT, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> You really like all of this mangling of the shell syntax?
In all Unix systems, we simply avoid situations where this mangling is needed
(e.g. "sh -c some-mangled-statements"). Why do you think this a good practice
in BPXBATCH
and was not functional without C. Assembler
macro's are an extension to Assembler. HTML
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019, 11:23:05 AM PDT, Gord Tomlin
wrote:
On 2019-10-01 00:34, Jon Perryman wrote:
> And you would be wrong.
On 2019-10-01 06:30, David Crayford wrote:
> And y
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019, 10:45:59 AM PDT, Charles Mills
wrote:
> #ifdef __MVS__
> #define OVERRIDE
> #else
> #define OVERRIDE override
>#endif
#if directives are not valid in C macro's. C macro's only copy information.
This example simply shows that C macro's content can be changed.
Jo
On Thursday, October 3, 2019, 12:50:34 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> these function are NOT 'exit' points in open/close processing
> OPEN and CLOSE call them through the SSI; how are they not exit points?
The SSI is for subsystems and not for exit points. Subsystems can implement
exits (
On Friday, September 27, 2019, 12:31:41 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
> I have no interest in arguing with the willfully ignorant.
You shouldn't argue with that voice in your head. You keep making statements
without any justification.
Show us a C macro that does more than copy C code into
On Friday, September 27, 2019, 12:27:22 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
> JS has things called classes and objects, but their behaviors are not
> what the OO community means by object oriented.
Since the OO community can't exclude JS by definition, they must resort to
their intent. We may
On Thursday, September 26, 2019, 09:19:02 PM PDT, David Crayford
wrote:
> On 2019-09-27 2:05 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
>> This assumes Javascript and CSS are not part of the HTML language.
> They're not. They have completely different language standards and can
> be u
On Thursday, September 26, 2019, 01:08:35 PM PDT, Jeremy Nicoll
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, at 19:36, Jon Perryman wrote:
>> Was the definition of
>> "macro" always the same as "copy"?
> No. Perhaps you should read through:
> https://en.w
On Thursday, September 26, 2019, 01:32:58 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
> DOM is not HTML, it's a representation of HTML files. HTML doesn't have
> classes.
The HTML is converted into a DOM object. This object is used by javascript and
web browser to access the HTML. This object clearly
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019, 07:34:05 AM PDT, Allan Staller
wrote:
> That is not considered a good practice in RACF circles. The best practice
> would be:
> MCAT - UACC(NONE) READ(*) ALTER(sysprogs) (note: No update access
> except via sysprogs)
Any system where the master cat
On Thursday, September 26, 2019, 01:15:42 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> You are referring to XML parse tree.
> Not even close. What are you smoking?
After looking at Perl's HTML5 DOM which came out this year, I stand corrected.
Apparently, people are willing to put a lot of effort and
On Thursday, September 26, 2019, 12:31:23 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
> The definition of macro has never been the same as copy.
Seriously! The most sophisticated C macro possible is "#DEFINE MYMAC B C D ".
Calling the macro "A MYMAC Y" results in "A B C D E". Additional macro
substit
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019, 07:05:47 PM PDT, Clark Morris wrote:
>> Copy books cam in with Jovial, well before 1970.
>> Assemblers had COPY instructions in the 1960s.
>> PL/I had the %INCLUDE statement in the 1960s. By 1970 it was old hat.
> COBOL D on DOS/360 had copybooks in 1966 or ear
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019, 11:13:19 AM PDT, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> The format of an HTML parse tree constructed by,
> e.g., a Perl program, is not compatible with JavaScript.
You are referring to XML parse tree. HTML parse tree's do not exist outside web
browsers. Even Nodejs parses
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019, 02:44:14 AM PDT, David Crayford wrote:
> Are you talking about the DOM? The definition of OO typically refers to
> languages that support polymorphism, inheritance and encapsulation. HTML
> is basically a markup language.
I'm talking about the DOM object
> HTML is not only not object oriented, it is not even a procedural language.
Using developer tools in any browser will show you each object with the object
attributes. HTML predefined all classes and the attributes associated with
those classes (e.g. input, div, table, ...). These objects are
> On Sunday, September 22, 2019, 02:26:31 PM PDT, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> In visual studio property pages you can specify preprocessor directives but
> Iyou say __MVS__
> Is built-in you answered my question
While builtin macro __MVS__ resolves this specific situation, you may
eventua
> On Monday, September 23, 2019, 03:35:42 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Indeed, but HTML is not one of them. HTML has syntax for encapsulating a
> script in some other language, but it is not in itself a scripting language.
Actually, HTML is a scripting language and object oriented. Certa
> On Sunday, September 22, 2019, 02:46:54 AM PDT, Shivang Sharma wrote:
My dataset is less the max limit . VIO has support for BDAM as well.
VIO should not cause a hang. Report the problem to IBM. This will have you take
a dump so they can look at why your jobs are hanging.
Jon.
--
I'm sure there must be controls but I familiar with them.
You mentioned BDAM. Maybe VIO is not fully compatible with BDAM when it pages
out a VIO block.
As for paging, it will occur even if it's only some. At this point, you are
trying to find the cause. I'm just giving you what could be pos
On Saturday, September 21, 2019, 12:33:07 PM PDT, Shivang Sharma wrote:
> 3 show VIO being paged out .
Paging VIO is not necessarily a bad thing. Check for excessive amount of data
being written to VIO. Check storage usage for the system. Maybe another address
space is using a lot of storag
> (union and bit mapping) An archaism of C that remains
> because old *nix programs use or used them.
>Legacy of the era of expensive RAM.
Those days are long gone. There is someone in the chrome browser group who is
just now complaining that he has exceeded 70GB ram (yes, ram). For me, GMAI
tember 20, 2019, 03:23:25 PM PDT, Gord Tomlin
wrote:
Some snippage and interspersed comments...
On 2019-09-20 17:11, Jon Perryman wrote:
> For instance, mapping to C does not support remapping, redefinition or
> re-declaring variables such as "org" in assembler.
Actually,
> XLC has a DSECT conversion utility.
Surprisingly, I think I must have been the only one to generate IPCS mapping
automatically using assembler macro's. Less than 100 lines of simple code
greatly improved dump reading. As a product developer, I had to read a lot of
dumps and this saved a lo
> If I have dynam(DLL) module and the load module has a number of CSECT
> Can I still BASR to other CSECT
> By browsing dynam(DLL) module Seems to be another type format than regular
> load module
I've never used assembler DLL functionality but from my understanding, you are
supposed to u
> On Friday, September 6, 2019, 11:43:00 AM PDT, Peter Relson
> wrote:
> Does it need saying that you ought to have your own recovery and take your
> own SVC Dump to meet your own diagnostic needs?
MPF processing is also used for Netview message processing and has some basic
abend recov
Questions about MVS Unix facility such as create_thread would probably get an
answer on the OMVS-l newsgroup.
Jon
On Tuesday, September 10, 2019, 12:46:23 PM PDT, Thomas David Rivers
wrote:
In the Callable Services documentation, in the pthread_create
description, the usage notes desc
> On Sunday, September 15, 2019, 10:40:53 PM PDT, Bill Soper
> wrote:
> With CICS 5.5... you can submit as the CICS logged on userid...
This could still become a headache for the security admin and others if not
managed correctly. Assigning surogat and maintaining dataset profiles for CICS
> On Monday, September 16, 2019, 10:54:02 AM PDT, Peter
wrote:
> I have seen few vendors suggesting an IPL as requisite
Product vendor's do not want to be the cause for an IPL unless it's absolutely
necessary. z/OS has many features that we can use to avoid IPL's. SVC's can be
replaced
On Thursday, September 5, 2019, 06:06:41 AM PDT, John McKown
wrote:
> I completely agree. Unfortunately, we have a number of batch jobs which are
> submitted by CICS transactions run by users. The JCL is contained in an
> ASSEMBLER non-CICS program in the DFHRPL. These modules do go t
> One argument management offers in mitigation is that most of these CICS
> users don't have TSO, so they
> haven't the ability to submit batch jobs.
Job's can easily be submitted from CICS or IMS thru your job scheduler (I think
IBM OPC or CA7). I can't remember the specifics for requesting
> SVC allows you to execute authorized code in YOUR address space.
> It does not allow you to execute code in any arbitrary address space.
There is no YOUR address space. E.g. Getmain belongs to RSM but run authorized
in any address space that uses the getmain macro.
>From a product persp
I'm not sure how you made the leap to the DLL module was not found. These
messages imply the CELQV003 was found but the xplink attribute did not match.
The binder uses the DLL module to validate attributes are correct instead of
doing this validation at run time.
I agree with Don that you are
bove bar storage so the only way
> to do that is amode 64
> Figured when you do a malloc it would be above the bar
> The XL C\C++ compiler has a huge number of deficiencies
> > On Sep 1, 2019, at 8:17 PM, Jon Perryman wrote:
> >
> > IBM PI68779: An customer PL/I 64bit
On Sunday, September 1, 2019, 08:31:39 PM PDT, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>> As for IBM C having several deficiencies, remember that z/OS is a
>> very complex OS compared to Unix where 1 size fits all.
> Simpler is better.
I never said Uni
301 - 400 of 669 matches
Mail list logo
