-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISRDDN SHOWS MEMBER ALIAS
On 2014-09-30, at 07:03, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
> What
What is giving you the indication that they're ALIASes? Can you show a
snapshot of your ISRDDN screen? When I browse the SYSPROC concatenation in
ISRDDN I get the list of members along with which library they're in. I see
the BLS* members and ISRDDN indicates they're in "library 8" which on m
HCLB201 appears to be C/370 version 2.2 from 1999. Is there a specific reason
you're installing what appears to be a very old C? If you need this old
version of C for some reason, you may need to build a completely separate SMP/E
environment to install it. I think your problem may be that you
Isn't the C library and compiler shipped and installed with all serverpacs? It
just isn't activated until you do so in IFAPRDxx?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mainframe Mainframe
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:
The dataset called "GDG" in your DCB also needs to exist and be cataloged
somewhere on your new z/OS 2.1 system. In your "DCB=(GDG,LRECL=...), the "GDG"
is called a model DCB and it is another dataset name that needs to exit and be
found in the normal catalog search.
Rex
-Original Message
system matches Anthony's
2.1 system. Is the fact that the OP's system appears to be different in
SCEELKED another problem?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 11:51
I've been watching this exchange from a distance. Are we now confusing 2
issues here? We have the original problem of CEEPLPKA and the secondary one of
his running apply jobs bypassing holderrors without knowing what he was
bypassing.
The OP has gotten an apply check to run with RC=0 after
.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/tools/java/services/j6servsum31.html
--
Donald J.
dona...@4email.net
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question on java versioning and maintenance levels on z/OS. I have
> 2 different copies of Java 1.6.0 and
Hi,
I have a question on java versioning and maintenance levels on z/OS. I have 2
different copies of Java 1.6.0 and am trying to decipher which is the more
current. I've been under the assumption that the SRmFPn gave the maintenance
level, and that the higher the numbers, the more current th
Ron,
One of your explanation paragraphs caught my attention so I'm asking out of
curiosity, for my own benefit.
What I find important is there is no data transformation or recall latency:
it is all transparent to the application. You have to read 12 months of
General Ledger files or SMF data s
>
> It is very fast to down load anything from the web. I use it to download all
> of
> the IBM Manuals I want. I think I downloaded 678 PDFs from IBM in about 10
> mins maybe 20 mins.
>
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mai
11:24:52 AM:
> From: "Pommier, Rex"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 08/19/2014 11:25 AM
> Subject: revisiting the documentation dilemma
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>
> Hi list,
>
> I've been meandering through the archives and saw s
/
Kolusu
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
08/19/2014 08:24:52 AM:
> From: "Pommier, Rex"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 08/19/2014 08:25 AM
> Subject: revisiting the documentation dilemma
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>
> Hi list,
>
age-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Pommier, Rex
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 8:25 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: revisiting the documentation dilemma
>
> Hi list,
>
> I've been meandering t
Hi list,
I've been meandering through the archives and saw several threads regarding
documentation changes that IBM has been implementing, with knowledge centers et
al. So my question is a rather basic one. We just upgraded to 1.13 a couple
months ago. Do the documentation DVDs no longer exi
Ron Thomas wrote:
>The Program is running in production, when we browse the loadlib it is
>showing ABEND U4093-92 . We are now planning to make the changes and move to
>production, was wondering why this is showing like this ?
"When we browse the loadlib"... Are you getting an ISPF abend?
Willie,
While I can't comment on what you need to do to actually fix the problem, I can
comment on your confusion about the SDSP. The description in the storage mgmt
manual (I have a slightly older revision of the book) for message 909 (you
documented 908) says:
MSG 909 ERROR OPENING [DSN(da
Try running the extract again, using TECH.SCRT.PART2 as your input and see what
dates you get. I think it MIGHT be giving you the beginning and ending dates
of the data it found in the input report.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA
Agreed, it is a rather strange acronym. Maybe somebody in ACM likes the
Muppets (MASPEGHI sounds suspiciously like "Miss Piggy").
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Gilmore
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 11:2
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:40 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
> it is lucid enough, but to read it easily you will need to be
> comfortable with and tolerant of current computer-science jargon.
> (The acronym MASPEGH ought, for example, to have been strangled at or,
> better, aborted before birth, but
I think the reason he's running multiple steps is because of the format of his
dump tapes. I got the picture he did full volume dumps on a volume-by-volume
basis, and now he's trying to recover a multi-volume dataset at the dataset
level.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe D
] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 3:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.13 and 3490 tape drives
When you say 'just sitting there', what do you mean? Are you not getting the
mount messages on the console? Nothing showing up on the 349
When you say 'just sitting there', what do you mean? Are you not getting the
mount messages on the console? Nothing showing up on the 3490 displays?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lopez, Sharon
Sent: Thursday, Aug
“Systems Programming: Guilty, until proven innocent” John Norgauer 2004
-Original Message-
From: Mike Schwab [mailto:mik...a.sch...@gm...com]
Sent: August 5, 2014 17:09
Subject: Re: Initialization problem in Storage Group
Volumes named but not created appear on the list but all values are b
list but all values are blank.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> Neil,
>
> What does the StorGrp display look like in ISMF when you have the
> non-existent volumes in the SG? Do they show up on the CDS-name display but
> not on the ACTIVE display?
>
> Re
Neil,
What does the StorGrp display look like in ISMF when you have the non-existent
volumes in the SG? Do they show up on the CDS-name display but not on the
ACTIVE display?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
This can also be done as a command line command: "BNDS 35 80" which will
insert the BNDS line in your edit session showing the boundaries.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, Jul
Esmie,
Type in the BNDS command as a line command, and it will insert a line into your
edit session with < and > at the beginning and end. You can then put the <>
anywhere you wish. Ex:
** * Top of Data
**
=BNDS>
Just a guess, but would it fix the errors if you simply reran the AUDIT command
with FIX instead of NOFIX?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of esmie moo
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 10:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.ED
I think your print command should be
PRINT TRACKS(,00,10017,14) INDDNAME(DASD)
You are printing cylinder/track, so the last track would be cyl 10017, track 14
within that cylinder.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
O
Shane et al,
I work for one of these small customers, and believe me, we know that software
included in the base isn't free. But since it is included in the base code, we
are paying for it whether or not we actually use it, and it becomes difficult
to justify paying for 2 pieces of software (i
OK, I'll byte.
Small shop, 150 address spaces, have 250 M ECSA defined, using 50M of it.
No thoughts on what "too much ECSA" would be.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014
Do a google search on hex editor. I found a couple free ones that looked
interesting.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rick Stetser
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 8:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Not to pick nits, but the APAR says it is 1.12 and above, not 1.11.
In any case, I missed this enhancement, so thank you, Mr. Relson, for pointing
it out.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Relson
Sent: Tues
Hi list,
We are looking at the possibility of installing a new z/OS,CICS,DB2 monitoring
suite. Can anybody give me feedback on CA-Sysview
capabilities/overhead/anything else I should be looking for? Good, bad, ugly?
Please respond off-list - no need to clutter IBM-Main.
Rex
The information
Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> No, this JCL is recataloging a currently-existing page dataset into your
> new master catalog. You would use SPACE if you were creating a new page
> dataset.
>
> Rex
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM
No, this JCL is recataloging a currently-existing page dataset into your new
master catalog. You would use SPACE if you were creating a new page dataset.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mainframe Mainframe
Sent
Engineering | Information Technology | +1 973
740 5459 (tel) | ken.porow...@cit.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN
Hmm, got one today.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM Announcement Letters
Anyone having trouble with their Announcement Le
9340 had no RAID inside - 2 stand-alone 5 1/4 inch HDA's. If an HDA failed, it
was gone just like other SLEDs. (voice of experience)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of DASDBILL2
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 2:26 PM
To: I
Bill,
While I don't know when the 3390s last rolled off the assembly line, I believe
they were all SLEDs. After that came the short-lived 9340/9345 subsystem which
had a different track length than the 3390 (built on 5 1/4 inch drives), then
the RAMAC II devices which might be what you're thin
Interesting numbers. Latest entry is $.007/MB for PC memory. I wonder what
the average price for z12 memory is today.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 2:04 PM
To: IBM-MAI
ist [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 11:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Friday Puzzler
On Fri, 23 May 2014 16:25:10 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
>Check the JCL reference manual under DD DISP parameter. If you have an OLD
>permane
Don,
Check the JCL reference manual under DD DISP parameter. If you have an OLD
permanent dataset that was PASSed to the step, the normal disposition is DELETE
if the dataset was originally new.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.
I believe Radoslaw was looking for 32 versus 64 bit on a Windows platform,
since he is trying to use IBM Download Director. On the Windows platform I'm
not sure it is quite as obvious as to whether we're running 32 or 64 bit. I
found a Java directory under both Program Files and Program Files
: Re: BMC MainView for DB2
Dear Rex, thank you for your answer.
As I have not access to BMC remedy, could you please verify to me if
MainView for DB2 v10 is compatible with DB2 v9.1?
Thanks in advance
Kostas
On 23 May 2014 16:01, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> They definitely don't make it easy
They definitely don't make it easy to find! What I found was 11.1.0 available
on 6/25/2013, supported on z/OS 1.12, 1.13, 2.1. DB2 9.1, 10, and 11 are
listed as supported.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of K
Sent
First off, thanks for all who chimed in with ideas. Here's what we found out.
We're checking with the developers to see if they have any reason this VSAM
dataset needs to be SHR(3 3), with the recommendation they change it to (2 3).
The batch code has no internal means of serializing updates t
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dno
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: $OJ
Thanks Rex,
$avrs is class 5 only, jes2 for class 5 is:
write,write output=print. Still researching this
Dean
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 21, 2014, at 4:09 PM, "
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dno
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: $OJ
It was a question because I can not find where the output class is being
changed.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 21, 2014, at 10:53 AM, "Pommier, Rex" wrote:
>
>
Allan,
The OP gave a command of $OJOBQ,Q=5. Wouldn't this command be dealing only
with releasing held output that is already in class 5? It has nothing with
class J output. I'm not sure where the idea that this command is releasing
class J to class 5 comes from.
Rex
-Original Message
tant
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> We have a VSAM KSDS with 1 record in it that is causing us some heartburn.
> I was able to create a new dataset and REPRO this one into the new one
> successfully, and the new dataset works fine, but I'
Gene,
Yup, that's why I'm guessing it's a sharing/protection issue. I didn't build
the stuff, just got the corrupt VSAM dataset dropped in my lap.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gene Hudders
Sent: Tuesday, Ma
(3,3)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM question/problem
What are SHR options?
In a message dated 5/20/2014 4:21:17 P.M. C
loaded record. Being there are some counts in the splits
field, there has to have been a bunch more records. See if this mini reorg
fixes it.
John Clifford
IBM consultant
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> We have a VSAM KSDS with 1 record in it that is
ck over the
file with the unloaded record. Being there are some counts in the splits
field, there has to have been a bunch more records. See if this mini reorg
fixes it.
John Clifford
IBM consultant
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> We have a VSAM KSDS with
assume that the statistics are "golden" and make decisions based on them,
rather than actually reading the file itself.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> We have a VSAM KSDS with 1 record in it that is causing us some heartburn.
> I was able
Allan,
I got a sneaking suspicion I'll be doing the "fuggiddabaddit" rather than
spending a bunch of time on it - and if it happens again I'll be taking it to
IBM. The "average key length: 0.0" is the same output I get on the working
repro'd copy. I was just wondering if anybody had seen som
Hi List,
We have a VSAM KSDS with 1 record in it that is causing us some heartburn. I
was able to create a new dataset and REPRO this one into the new one
successfully, and the new dataset works fine, but I'd like to know what may be
causing the original to be having problems - and possibly ho
:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FINDING CLUSTER NAME
The VVDS will also show the catalog name where it should be cataloged.
Jon Perryman
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 7:39 AM, "Pommier, Rex"
wrote:
What Allan and Greg said
>
>Of course, if you want the proo
What Allan and Greg said
Of course, if you want the proof of the cluster name and you don't have REVIEW
installed, you can simply do an IDCAMS PRINT against the VVDS dataset on the
volume where the ".DATA" resides to find the associated cluster name. I did
this last week. :-)
Rex
-O
So what gets sent down the channel? If I put BLKSIZE=1024 on my JCL for the
output DD statement of the DFDSS dump job, will DFDSS dutifully send 1K blocks
down the channel to the tape controller/drive and the hardware builds big
blocks and writes the large block to the tape, or does DFDSS "know
Do you see anything else burning up the processor during this slowdown time?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Predictive Fa
He didn't say they were good, just edible. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 5:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Real programmers eat foo
I
Bill and Anthony,
As pointed out, we had missed the part about the default of the PCCA moving
above the line. The PSW is definitely saying they are 24 bit addresses (PSW at
time of abend: 078D0F00 9758) and even I'm smart enough to know that you
can't use a 31 bit address in a 24 bit progr
Bernd,
As to your question about using the 31 bit version, the answer is "we don't
have time to make changes to the called programs and they work so upgrading
them is low priority". The calls are definitely dynamic, as the programs are
interpreted; and yes, it is doing a CPU check.
Rex
---
it.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 2:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: S0C4 abend on old assembler program when upgrading to z/OS 1.13
Thanks, I just foun
Thanks, I just found that too. The bizarre thing is we're allowing that to
default on both LPARs, which should mean it would fail on the test LPAR as
well. We are in the process of changing DIAG00 to force these locations above
the line on test to see if it will cause the program to fail.
I'l
Hi list,
I'm looking for a pair of virtual eyes to help me with a problem that is
perplexing about 4 of us here. We're running z/OS 1.11 and are attempting to
upgrade to 1.13. Here's the scenario: we have an ancient version of something
called quikjob which is a report writer. Due to some a
And to get around the problem of only 2 splits, I simply set PF14 to "SPLIT
NEW" (and PF21 to SWAP LIST) which allows me up to the IBM default of 8 split
screens. I might have to change that, though as I sometimes run out...
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [m
Radoslaw,
Yes, HOD is a browser-based 3270 emulator, but it doesn't need to be hosted via
IHS on the mainframe. At a prior job it was hosted on a Windows server.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Monday
My addition of Passport to the list was specifically in response to the OSA-ICC
request. We're using it for both ICC and standard TN3270 usage.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 2:
We're using Passport. My last site used Rumba.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of MARTIN, MIKE
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: 3270 Emulators and consoles
All,
We have a z114
any site that has the SMC connected to an external network
might want to reevaluate that
Therein lies the rub. At my site, the dictate has come down from on high (and
not completely without merit) that any PC on the network needs to be supported.
The SMC needs to be on the network in order f
Subject: Re: DS6800 disk - was support is ending for Windows XP - Microsoft
Windows
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 20:48 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> And from what I've been able to find, IBM doesn't officially support
> the DS Storage Manager for the DS6800s on anything more current than
Multiple ways to do this. A couple that come to mind quickly are:
1. If the disk volume is completely contained on the single volume (ie the
catalog only has datasets on this volume and all datasets on this volume are in
this catalog) you could EXPORT DISCONNECT this catalog on the current sys
No, but I have it on a PC front-ending my DS6800s. And from what I've been
able to find, IBM doesn't officially support the DS Storage Manager for the
DS6800s on anything more current than XP.
So I have a question for the group. Is anybody out there running the DS
Storage Manager for DS6800s
Tom,
I have a question on your comment about offloading XML to specialty engines.
To quote:
Also, offloading to specialty processors does not change total CPU usage,
and does not improve performance or throughput. It could change
how much you pay to run it.
My standard engines are kneecap
But are the tapes round? :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Last Gasp For Hard Disk Drives
How typical. An article about new drive
ch 20, 2014 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Restoring a VSAM dataset in Production
Dude,
Is there any important procedure to do before submitting this job? BTW
really thanks for the valuable response.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
> Do you have acces
A.EDU
Subject: Re: Restoring a VSAM dataset in Production
Buddy, i have done non VSAM restorations, but i am unaware of VSAM
restoration. I need to know the procedure for how to restore a VSAM dataset
which is the logical one, So kindly provide it.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Pommier, Rex
dataset in Production
Sorry mates,
The dataset is a logical one and i need to restore to the volume which we
created for all restore datasets (we have separate Storage Group for
restoration).
So kindly provide the procedure for this logical one.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Pommier, Rex
IF you have the ability to rename the current production dataset, I believe you
could do the following:
1. rename current dataset to a temporary name (don't forget to rename the
data/index/aix etc, not just the cluster name).
2. restore the backed up dataset - I don't think it would need to go
Actually I think MVS would be more akin to one of the "2 all beef patties".
:-) Would JES or DFP be the second patty?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 2:
Before doing the mget, enter "prompt off" to shut off interactive prompting
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Norgauer
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: uploading a PDS
Let me guess. This is another of those "mainframe limitations" because the
windows team doesn't have to report utilization therefore the "problem" isn't
seen over there.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Se
Mark,
You should be able to use the DEF RECATALOG. With the RECATALOG, IDCAMS will
look at the dataset on the DASD volume and build the catalog entries for the
dataset.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Pa
So break it again! We want to know!! :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NODUMP
Good news/bad news. Good news, I fixed the
Frank,
Actually, having been an application programmer in my past, I would have been
somewhere between surprised and dismayed to see the lines of code function as
you want. The RETURN-CODE variable is documented as returning a code either
back to the operating system or to the calling program.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 8:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Deleting multiple data sets
W dniu 2014-02-21 14:43, Pommier, Rex pisze:
> Ant,
>
> Is DF/
Ant,
Is DF/DSS smart enough to notice that if I am sending the output to DD DUMMY to
not recall HSM migrated datasets before deleting them?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Anthony Thompson
Sent: Thursday, Febru
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 03:36:43 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>According to the CICS manual you should not use REGION=0M. So rerun the job
>with REGION=8M or REGION=10M or REGION=5M or any other number until it does
>not abend.
>
How about REGION=16385K?
(By experiment, I discover that REGION=0K
Skip,
Yup, VVDSes existed way back then. I remember initializing new 3380Ds and Es,
and trying to get the VTOC, VTOCIX, and VVDS all sitting nicely right next to
each other. Some at the beginning of the volume, some 1/3 of the way through
depending on the type of data that was going to reside
So current IBM management looks like they're trying to break the company into a
bunch of smaller companies like Akers(?) tried to do several years ago???
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Friday, Februa
Ray,
Just out of curiosity, would it work if you added a third DD card to the
original SYSLPARM DD concatenation? The JCL ref manual doesn't explicitly
state the override needs something to override, but it might be worth a try.
Can you try something like:
//SYSLPARM DD DSN=&&tempds,DISP=(O
-Original Message-
From: Robert A. Rosenberg [mailto:hal9...@panix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 11:10 PM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Cc: Pommier, Rex
Subject: Re: Dumb SMPE question
At 22:42 + on 02/06/2014, Pommier, Rex wrote about Re: Dumb SMPE question:
>M
Mark,
Let me ask a general question about IBM packaging. Does IBM ever send a fixing
PTF with a PRE(PE-PTF) instead of a SUP(PE-PTF)? If the fixing PTF has a PRE
of the PTF you deleted, would you not be causing yourself problems in that the
PRE PTF is now missing?
Rex
-Original Message-
John,
In your case, yes that is what it means. Look up the retention control
statements in the TLMS manuals. You have 2 locations described by this line,
in 5DC0001, you are using days to control the time it stays here (5), the
location is DC, and it is sticking around 1 day. In the second c
Radoslaw,
About 10 years ago I was given the task to migrate off an RVA onto a different
disk subsystem. Not really knowing how to erase the disks without use of a
sledgehammer, I initialized all the volumes to logically erase them, then
uploaded a bunch of songs to the array. I then proceede
Jim,
Obviously I don't have access to their source code, so I can't answer your
question. I do appreciate the patient responses you gave to my questions and
the help you (and others) gave me while I was trying to figure this one out.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discu
901 - 1000 of 1098 matches
Mail list logo
