Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Hunkeler Peter (TLSG 4)
A completely different topic, but sequence numbers are obviously (I think. Am I wrong?) entirely a vestigial organ left from the days of punched cards. They were a lifesaver if you dropped your cards on the floor, and the compilers put out a warning if you loaded the cards into the reader in

Re: VisualAge

2013-04-09 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Benjamin Huntsman wrote: Was wondering, might anyone here have an old copy of VisualAge PL/I 2.1 and/or VisualAge Cobol 3.07 that they'd be willing to part with for some reasonable compensation? Did you asked IBM? These languages are copyrighted and licensed by IBM. I doubt if anyone will

Re: Telnet vbscript error

2013-04-09 Thread Jantje.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 07:07:11 -0700, Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We are trying to script into tso with a VBSCRIPT. The script looks like I can't help you with the VBScript; that really is not my strong point... If I need scripting a 3270 session, I use Tom Brennan's Vista

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread DASDBILL2
That sounds great.  Having to put code into my code in order to start using XDC has always been a PITA for me.  And debugging my recovery routines (ESTAE, e.g.) were an even bigger PITA. Bill Fairchild Franklin, TN - Original Message - From: Chuck Arney ch...@arneycomputer.com

Re: Telnet vbscript error

2013-04-09 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Itschak Mugzach wrote: We are trying to script into tso with a VBSCRIPT. The script looks like this: WARNING and disclaimer - I have NO experience with VBSCRIPT, but have experience in scripting TSO sessions. WshShell.SendKeys o 10.1.13.228 WshShell.Sendkeys({Enter}) WScript.Sleep 1000

test

2013-04-09 Thread william janulin
another test - I sent two posts yesterday but did not see a copy of them that I usually get as subscriber to the list. Bill J. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: test

2013-04-09 Thread Mark Regan
I believe that the default setting is to set you to not receive your own posts. You have to override that by sending to the list server the following command: set ibm-main repro BTW, I notice that you are using Yahoo Mail. Have you been having any issues with receiving the posts of others on the

Re: A new CBT Tape version has been cut

2013-04-09 Thread Barry Schrager
Sam, Thank you for keeping this going. A little history, the CBT Tape (Connecticut Bank and Trust) was originated by Arnold Casinghino of CBT as part of the SHARE MVS Group's push to exchange software that we were all writing. People would submit updates to Arnold and he would incorporate

Re: Telnet vbscript error

2013-04-09 Thread Itschak Mugzach
Telnet connects me to the default application. In this case, tso. I know it is tso for sure as I view rhe dos window opened by the script. Dino or rex, why is tso stutting the userid? בתאריך 9 באפר 2013 14:10, מאת Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za: Itschak Mugzach wrote: We

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Peter Relson
Think Black Team. Sorry, but that is not relevant. We try not to waste time and resources implementing things that no one needs (with less than 100% success, I'm sure). It is not a question of exercising the outlying cases of an implementation trying to break something. Should I infer from

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Martin Packer
I'm running a residency in the Autumn on 2.1 code (and you'll see an announcement as this one is expected to welcome customer etc nominations shortly). I mention this because Symbol Substitution via PARMDD is quite likely to feature. What I'll want to figure out then is whether the only in

Re: sorry.

2013-04-09 Thread Thomas Berg
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 5:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: sorry. In

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread David Cole
Hi Bill, It seems to me that the HOOK command would have addressed both of your PITAs. Best, Dave On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:09 AM, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net wrote: That sounds great. Having to put code into my code in order to start using XDC has always been a PITA for me. And

Re: A new CBT Tape version has been cut

2013-04-09 Thread scott
Mr. Schrager, You wouldn't happen to have kept a copy of ACF2 from back in the MVS/370 days would you? Thank you for a great product! With respect, Scott Vetter svet...@ameritech.net On 04/09/2013 07:34 AM, Barry Schrager wrote: Sam, Thank you for keeping this going. A little history,

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread DASDBILL2
I didn't know about the HOOK command.  I didn't read very widely in the HELP info.  I must have started out using XDC by getting a very old code sample from a colleague. Bill Fairchild Franklin, TN - Original Message - From: David Cole dbc...@gmail.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Re: CFRM policy size

2013-04-09 Thread Bill Neiman
The formula documented in the pub assumes that each lock table entry is 8 bytes wide. In many cases, that's bigger than it needs to be. The number of connectors determines the actual required lock table entry width. Note that CFSizer and the Sizer utility (the documentation for which you are

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread Micheal Butz
Hi I have used XDC sparingly but isn't The HOOK command a SVC which won't work in XMEM Sent from my iPhone On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:48 AM, David Cole dbc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bill, It seems to me that the HOOK command would have addressed both of your PITAs. Best, Dave On Tue, Apr

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread David Cole
z/XDC is a very large product with a myriad of capabilities and ways of doing things. Some older, some newer. I will admit that user training is an issue. On of my personal goals over the next few years is to provide more and better training materials going forward. Meanwhile, I personally am

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread David Cole
Gerhard, How about contacting me directly so that we can discuss your issue in depth. Thanks, Dave Cole On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.netwrote: On 4/8/2013 9:47 PM, David Cole wrote: WRT breakpoints, yes, 0C1s will occur when an address space, not

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread Ed Gould
On Apr 8, 2013, at 9:18 PM, David Cole wrote: --SNIPP recovery environment. Also, (security permitting) the HOOK command can be used to create a debugging session in any other running address space in the System, again without any code

Re: TFS tmp directory problems

2013-04-09 Thread Mark Zelden
Download zlsof from the z/OS Unix tools and toys page: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/unix/tools/ Sample output from a sandbox system: zlsof /tmp SYST:MZELDEN:/u/mzelden:$ zlsof /tmp CommandPID User

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread David Cole
Hi Ed, You wrote: Sigh... not relation to SEI's hook command from 20++ years ago I hope ? We were averaging 10+ IPL's a day due to that monster. Probably not. I've never heard of SEI let alone its hook command (whatever that is). z/XDC's HOOK command was written from scratch by yours truly

Dasd - Converting from Mod-9 to Mod-27

2013-04-09 Thread mf db
Hello, We are having DSS6000 storage box. This is just an informational query on how we convert a Mod-9 volume to Mod-27 ? Can this be achieved dynamically when the Dasd device is online or Else an outage is required for this conversion process ? Any ideas or suggestions are highly appreciated.

Re: Dasd - Converting from Mod-9 to Mod-27

2013-04-09 Thread Mike Schwab
You can use a product ((Fujitsu, er Softek, er Sun, er) IBM TDMF, FDRPAS, EMC z/OS Migrator, etc) to move the logical volser from a physical UCB to another physical UCB of the same size or larger. ADRDSSU will move it but it can't be in use. Once on a larger volume, run ICKDSF REFVTOC to pickup

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 07:45:18 -0400, Peter Relson wrote: Should I infer from this that only symbol substitution by instream data set processing occurs, and if the PARMDD data set is not instream no symbol processing is possible? Yes you should. There is no intrinsic support in GET to ask for

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread Kenneth Wilkerson
Howdy, My name is Kenneth and I'm the architect of TDF. I thought I would take a few minutes to clarify a little about TDF. This is my first time doing this. First, TDF is designed to be much more than an interactive debug tool. It wasn't designed to compete with any existing products.

Re: VisualAge

2013-04-09 Thread Clark Morris
On 9 Apr 2013 03:31:26 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: Benjamin Huntsman wrote: Was wondering, might anyone here have an old copy of VisualAge PL/I 2.1 and/or VisualAge Cobol 3.07 that they'd be willing to part with for some reasonable compensation? Did you asked IBM? These

The GDDM CCSID 351 does not match the CCSID of 1047 at database DB9G

2013-04-09 Thread William Janulin
I am resending this as I just switched my subscription to gmail fro yahoo. If anyone has run into this situation, any information would be greatly appreciated. I am not sure what the easier solution would be on this, QMF versus DB2. Thank you in advance, Bill Janulin

Re: A new CBT Tape version has been cut

2013-04-09 Thread Barry Schrager
No Scott, I don't have a copy hidden away. Thanks for the compliment on ACF2. Barry On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 6:50:45 AM UTC-6, scott wrote: Mr. Schrager, You wouldn't happen to have kept a copy of ACF2 from back in the MVS/370 days would you? Thank you for a great product!

Re: Dasd - Converting from Mod-9 to Mod-27

2013-04-09 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2013-04-09 15:53, mf db pisze: Hello, We are having DSS6000 storage box. This is just an informational query on how we convert a Mod-9 volume to Mod-27 ? Can this be achieved dynamically when the Dasd device is online or Else an outage is required for this conversion process ? Any ideas

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread DASDBILL2
Maybe you are confusing/conflating the HOOK command with the HOOK macro, which long ago (pre-HOOK command days) was the way to start interactively debugging your code with XDC.  You put the HOOK macro into your code at the point where you wanted to start debugging/tracing and reassembled that

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread Frank
Bill, You are thinking of the #DIE macro. That assembles into a x'00' instruction with a special identifier for zXDC. If zXDC is established as the newest ESTAE, the #DIE would cause a debugging session to start. Otherwise a S0C1 is generated. A HOOK, either a dynamic HOOK or the #XDCHOOK

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread DASDBILL2
You're right.  #DIE is what I was describing.  I confuse and conflate things myself. I think there is  a HOOK macro in z/OS that assembles into a Monitor Call instruction for a User event to be traced by GTF, but I could be conflating some more . Bill Fairchild Franklin, TN -

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread Micheal Butz
I think the main issue at least with z/XDC Is that Dave operates whitin z/OS RTM so he has to abide by z/OS rules In each environment thus making his Job complicated Sent from my iPhone On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:46 AM, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net wrote: You're right. #DIE is what I was

Re: The GDDM CCSID 351 does not match the CCSID of 1047 at database DB9G

2013-04-09 Thread Matthew Stitt
Looking on my system, I have an ADMDEFS dataset which contains the line: ADMMDFT APPCPG=1047 Which I believe resolves this issue. The code page must match in both the QMF and DB2 subsystem definitions. Hope this helps On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:29:43 -0400, William Janulin wjanu...@gmail.com

Re: TFS tmp directory problems

2013-04-09 Thread Gibney, Dave
My list, and you are correct the home for the OEDFLTU is /tmp and perhaps it needn't be :) And perhaps these dubbed address spaces don't need a home directory at all z/OS will end here at 1.13 (if I even get that far), so I may or may not make the effort to end the use of the default

Re: The GDDM CCSID 351 does not match the CCSID of 1047 at database DB9G

2013-04-09 Thread Ed Finnell
And the emulator client? In a message dated 4/9/2013 11:38:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time, mathwst...@bellsouth.net writes: Which I believe resolves this issue. The code page must match in both the QMF and DB2 subsystem definitions.

Re: The GDDM CCSID 351 does not match the CCSID of 1047 at database DB9G

2013-04-09 Thread William Janulin
Matt, Is that ADMDEFS dataset a GDDM dataset or a QMF dataset? Thks, Bill J. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Matthew Stitt mathwst...@bellsouth.netwrote: Looking on my system, I have an ADMDEFS dataset which contains the line: ADMMDFT APPCPG=1047 Which I believe resolves this issue.

Re: The GDDM CCSID 351 does not match the CCSID of 1047 at database DB9G

2013-04-09 Thread William Janulin
It is a zOS system On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote: And the emulator client? In a message dated 4/9/2013 11:38:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time, mathwst...@bellsouth.net writes: Which I believe resolves this issue. The code page must match in both the

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread Ed Gould
SEI = Shield enterprises inc. Consulting company (probably nationwide). Original written for CICS then when MVS came out they got it working on our system (groan). I told Russ Shields at one time I don't care what you do to CICS but keep it away from anything that is NOT CICS. He was not

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Walt Farrell
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:21:59 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: I have an outlying case to test my understanding: // SET FOO='WOM' // SET BAR=BAT // SET WOMBAT='SDB=YES' //* //STEP EXEC PGM=IEBGENER,PARMDD=SYSUT1 //SYSUT2DD SYSOUT=(,) //SYSUT1DD *,SYMBOLS=JCL

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread John McKown
Just a question that may be a bit pedantic. It is JES doing the substitution (a HASP program) or is it the converter/interpreter? I guess the main reason is to determine who to yell at. grin/ On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, 9 Apr 2013

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Walt Farrell
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:28:57 +0100, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com wrote: I'm running a residency in the Autumn on 2.1 code (and you'll see an announcement as this one is expected to welcome customer etc nominations shortly). I mention this because Symbol Substitution via PARMDD is quite

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread David Andrews
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 12:33 -0500, Ed Gould wrote: I told Russ Shields at one time I don't care what you do to CICS butkeep it away from anything that is NOT CICS. He was not amused. I imagine he's gotten over it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._Russell_Shields

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Gibney, Dave
I would hope converter/interpreter. If not, then instream substitution would not be available for Started Tasks. I have not read the announcement in any detail. Dave Gibney Information Technology Services Washington State University -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread David Cole
Hi Bill, Monitor Call instructions would be cool, and around 3 decades ago or so, I researched MVS' OCO infrastructure that supports MCs... but no, there are no MC instructions anywhere in z/XDC, and there never have been. Perhaps one time I did have a HOOK macro in z/XDC, I don't remember. But

Invoking a Rexx Exec From a ClLIST

2013-04-09 Thread esst...@juno.com
Let me begin by saying I am NOT a Rex Person I know a little about CLISTS, But I am No way a Rexx person. I need to call a Rexx Exec from an established CLIST. So before I attempted this endevor, I cobbled two small routines a CLIST which issues EX 'TEC0P0D1.REXX(REXTEST)' and a Rexx Exec

Re: Invoking a Rexx Exec From a ClLIST

2013-04-09 Thread Itschak Mugzach
Your clist should start edif (ISPEXEC EDIT DATASET...) IMACRO(your rexx exec). ITschak On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:51 PM, esst...@juno.com esst...@juno.com wrote: Let me begin by saying I am NOT a Rex Person I know a little about CLISTS, But I am No way a Rexx person. I need to call a Rexx

Re: Invoking a Rexx Exec From a ClLIST

2013-04-09 Thread Dave Salt
When the CLIST calls the REXX, nothing is being edited at that point. Therefore, the REXX is NOT executing as a Macro and it should not contain a MACRO statement. I think what you want to do is change the CLIST to do something like this: ISPEXEC EDIT 'SYS1.PROCLIB.CICSBKUP.P(TOAQTQ2)'

Re: Invoking a Rexx Exec From a ClLIST

2013-04-09 Thread John McKown
I agree with Itschak. The ISREDIT EDIT ... command does a recursive edit of another member/data set, when you are already in ISPF EDIT on something else. If your CLIST wants to edit a member/data set and run a REXX edit macro, then remove the ISREDIT EDIT line and have the CLIST invoke the ISPF

Re: The GDDM CCSID 351 does not match the CCSID of 1047 at database DB9G

2013-04-09 Thread Joel C. Ewing
ADM is the three-character prefix associated with GDDM modules, macros, etc. ADMDEFS is a GDDM external defaults file, which among other things is used to define GDDM printers and their attributes. Depending on what or how you are printing results, QMF on z/OS may use GDDM Services for

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread Ed Gould
Doesn't appear to be the same guy, at least from the description (essentially no history). Ed On Apr 9, 2013, at 12:53 PM, David Andrews wrote: On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 12:33 -0500, Ed Gould wrote: I told Russ Shields at one time I don't care what you do to CICS butkeep it away from anything

Re: The GDDM CCSID 351 does not match the CCSID of 1047 at database DB9G

2013-04-09 Thread Matthew Stitt
When I installed QMF, I needed the documentation library for QMF, DB2, and GDDM. This wasn't a trivial exercise. The ADM datasets belong to GDDM. the DSQ datasets belong to QMF. The QMF documentation will point you into the GDDM documentation, etc, etc. Hope this helps On Tue, 9

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread David Andrews
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 14:37 -0500, Ed Gould wrote: Doesn't appear to be the same guy, at least from the description (essentially no history). The Wikipedia article points to this: http://www.chicagobooth.edu/alumnicelebration/2008/awardsshields.aspx which seems to confirm that it's your

Re: New Software Tool for z/OS Developers Announced by Arney Computer Systems

2013-04-09 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 4/9/2013 11:43 AM, Frank wrote: You are thinking of the #DIE macro. That assembles into a x'00' instruction with a special identifier for zXDC. If zXDC is established as the newest ESTAE, the #DIE would cause a debugging session to start. Otherwise a S0C1 is generated. I sincerely hope

VSAM Demystified - 2013 edition

2013-04-09 Thread John McKown
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg246105.html?Open And it is in epub as well as PDF format, for those of us with ebook readers which can't deal well with PDFs. -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Tom Marchant
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:56:09 +, Gibney, Dave wrote: I would hope converter/interpreter. If not, then instream substitution would not be available for Started Tasks. I'm not sure what yo mean by this. If you mean for started tasks that run SUB=MSTR, then instream data sets are not

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:51:49 -0500, John McKown wrote: Just a question that may be a bit pedantic. It is JES doing the substitution (a HASP program) or is it the converter/interpreter? I guess the main reason is to determine who to yell at. grin/ Hardly cause to yell. If you need an

Re: Dasd - Converting from Mod-9 to Mod-27

2013-04-09 Thread EXT-Schwarz, Barry
It is a two step process: The first is configuring the volumes on the DS6000. Are you installing a new DS6000 and moving data from existing DASD to the new box or are you trying to combine existing -9 volumes (and possibly unused capacity) into a single -27 volume? The second is

Re: Invoking a Rexx Exec From a ClLIST

2013-04-09 Thread esst...@juno.com
Dave I issued commands like this in a CLIST ISPEXEC EDIT 'SYS1.PROCLIB.CICSBKUP.P(TOAQTQ2)' MACRO(REXTEST) How do I pass parameters to the Macro ? -- Original Message -- From: Dave Salt ds...@hotmail.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Invoking a Rexx Exec

Re: Invoking a Rexx Exec From a ClLIST

2013-04-09 Thread esst...@juno.com
John I will try what You and everyone else suggested. I have issued ISREDIT EDIT in a CLIST How do I pass parameter to the Rexx Macro ? -- Original Message -- From: John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Invoking a Rexx Exec From a

Re: Invoking a Rexx Exec From a ClLIST

2013-04-09 Thread EXT-Schwarz, Barry
The immediate cause of the bad return codes is that neither EDIT nor MACRO are ISREDIT commands As others have noted, your macro (REXX or CLIST) must be in a separate member from where you issue the EDIT command with the MACRO operand. However, allocating SYSEXEC the way you did is also a bad

Re: Invoking a Rexx Exec From a ClLIST

2013-04-09 Thread Dave Salt
I'm not logged on right now but I'm pretty sure the CLIST should issue ISPEXEC EDIT and not ISREDIT EDIT, and it should use the MACRO parameter not IMACRO. As for passing parameters there are several ways to do it, but my preference is for the CLIST to do something like this: SET MYVAL1 =

Use of the TRAPx Instructions

2013-04-09 Thread Morrison, Peter
I have had extensive experience with the use of the TRAPx (TRAP2/TRAP4) instructions in a z/OS environment. z/OS offers no support for setting up to enable them. Basically, you need to anchor things in the DUCT (Dispatchable Unit Control Table). There is one DUCT set up for each TCB and SRB.

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Gibney, Dave
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 1:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?) On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:56:09 +, Gibney, Dave wrote: I

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread John McKown
I don't think that instream data for a PROC started via SUB=MSTR will ever occur. The reason is that instream data is kept in the SPOOL. And there is no SPOOL associated with SUB=MSTR. This is the same reason that there is no support for SYSOUT= in a SUB=MSTR environment. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at

Re: 32760? (was: PARMDD?)

2013-04-09 Thread Gibney, Dave
I said useful. Should have added a :) Dave Gibney Information Technology Services Washington State University -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:00 PM To:

Re: Use of the TRAPx Instructions

2013-04-09 Thread Kenneth Wilkerson
You are certainly correct about the z/OS implementation of the TRAPx instruction. I often wondered why the hardware designers decided to implement it such that it inherits the user state and not a predefined state and why they didn't provide a service to register trap interfaces so they could be

Re: Use of the TRAPx Instructions

2013-04-09 Thread Binyamin Dissen
Looking as the DUCT, it also contains an indication of base address space or subspace. I would think that an ASYNC exit/IRB would not useethe basespace indicater of the current RB. On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:17:25 -0500 Kenneth Wilkerson redb...@austin.rr.com wrote: :You are certainly correct about

Re: Use of the TRAPx Instructions

2013-04-09 Thread Kenneth Wilkerson
Peter, since you did such an excellent job of describing the problem, I've decided to describe to you how TDF is going to handle asynchronous exits. Before doing so, I need to clearly state that for the current release of the product the asynchronous exit debugging is a restriction. Months ago I

Re: CFRM policy size

2013-04-09 Thread R Hey
Thanks Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Sequence Numbrs (was 32760? (was: PARMDD?))

2013-04-09 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In CAFMxNWJ6H_0KLL4Mo9-o5Q-AtwU_wJodAFh=X8vh1Vj=qf6...@mail.gmail.com, on 04/07/2013 at 04:57 PM, Sam Siegel s...@pscsi.net said: Patch is the unix version of SUPERC that shows the delta between source files. ITYM diff; the patch utility applies an update. diff3 allows a 3 way merge between

Re: Sequence Numbrs (was 32760? (was: PARMDD?))

2013-04-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:24:53 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: on 04/07/2013 at 04:57 PM, Sam Siegel said: diff3 allows a 3 way merge between the original source and 2 different updates to the original source. No; it merges two updates. ksh:1+ man diff3 Reformatting page. Please Wait...

Re: Use of the TRAPx Instructions

2013-04-09 Thread Bernd Oppolzer
Hello, I don't understand all of this discussion, but: we are using TRAP2 now for some time in our site specific debugging tool without problems. I would like to know if you see a hidden problem in our method of using it. Before switching to TRAP2, we did the same thing by catching 0C1 abends

Re: Use of the TRAPx Instructions

2013-04-09 Thread Bernd Oppolzer
Maybe, what's most important in this context: the test driver supports only single threaded testing, no subtasking. So, if I read your posts correctly, we should not have a problem, right? Kind regards Bernd Am 10.04.2013 02:08, schrieb Bernd Oppolzer: Hello, I don't understand all of this

Re: VisualAge

2013-04-09 Thread Benjamin Huntsman
The rules may not be the same for the MSDOS, Windows, Linux, OS2, AIX, etc. VisualAge products. Depending on the platform what the poster wants to do may be legal. Sorry, certainly wasn't trying to do anything shady. I know that the licenses for WDz/RAD/RDz products are non-transferable and

Re: Use of the TRAPx Instructions

2013-04-09 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 4/9/2013 7:03 PM, Kenneth Wilkerson wrote: So now specifically to asynchronous exits. There are 3 ways to schedule asynchronous exits that I know of, by STIMER(M), by SCHEDIRB and by the old, SCHEDXIT. If there are other ways, please let me know. There is at least one other - see the CIRB

Re: Use of the TRAPx Instructions

2013-04-09 Thread Kenneth Wilkerson
Thanks. I forgot about that one. It is covered in Chapter 22 on Exits in the Auth Assembler Guide. This would also be classified as a branch entry intercept. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Gerhard Postpischil Sent: