Since IBM has just added another free online introductory zEnterprise
course to the catalog, and I'd like to draw your attention to these
courses. Simply visit this Web site:
http://www.ibm.com/services/weblectures/dlv/ibm/z101
and you (and/or your colleagues) can take any of four online courses
IBM has a virtual class coming up on z/VSE's Language Environment, and
there's no charge. The class is scheduled for October 24, 2013, and will
last for about 80 minutes. Details are available here:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zvse/education/#upcoming
You can also listen to past classes
Raj,
You mean, you need other/more/new classnames to the SCDS, than there
already are from the original LPAR?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Raju Reddy
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 18:16
To:
Hi,
Since upgrading to z/OS 1.13 (our previous version was 1.11), We’re receiving
many IEC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL (v11.7).
The response from CA was that there was a change made in z/OS 1.12, and this
message occurs because CA-SPOOL is attempting to close a library that is still
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:18:56 +0800, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:
Since IBM has just added another free online introductory zEnterprise
course to the catalog, and I'd like to draw your attention to these
courses. Simply visit this Web site:
Hi
I'm afraid the new operator has a deleteat termination, so maybe
with malloc you will see the
storage leak.
On 10.10.2013 06:51, Charles Mills wrote:
I'm trying to see if a (batch, conventional z/OS, C++, 31-bit, V1R13)
program has memory leaks. After reading Diagnosing storage leak
Vernooij,
No. I don't need any new/more class names than original LPAR.
Do you have any idea of how to copy ISMF class entries from LPAR to LPAR.?
Cheers,
Raj
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
wrote:
Raj,
You mean, you need other/more/new
The entries are in the SCDS. If you copy the SCDS from one LPAR to the
other, you have the entries on the other LPAR and you only have to
activate this SCDS.
There is no need to copy them from the transported SCDS to the current
SCDS on the new LPAR, you can activate the transported SCDS on the
Ahhh.. that is an interesting observation. We only briefly ran one BC class
machine as a penalty box, so I haven't really tracked that line. That certainly
doesn't make life any easier for the smaller customers.
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 07:12:37 -0700, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
LOAD
ATTACH
LINK
doesn'tDE=LIST_ADDR
I thought list_addr is that of the BLDL
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 9, 2013, at 9:42 PM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net wrote:
On 10/9/2013 9:13 PM, MichealButz wrote:
The doc says list_addr okay I'll try name
Which doc? That is a
Gadi
I am not sure why OPS/MVS (I am guessing OPS is OPS/MVS) did not work.
Could you explain how you set it ?
A message rule in OPS/MVS is very simple and should always work.
For example:
)MSG IEC988I
)PROC
Job = msg.ojobname
If Job = 'CASPOOL' Then
Some action (This is typically
Kees,
Raju only wants a subset of the classes - not the entire SCDS. So yes, he
could copy the entire SCDS to the new LPAR. But that brings everything
over. So the challenge is
Which is less work,
Manually adding what is needed on the new LPAR
Deleting what is not needed on the new LPAR.
Lizette,
I did not understand that.
Apart from manually adding entries to the new CDS, you can COPY them
from the old to the new CDS. These are very repetitive actions that I
usually automate by running macros defined in my terminal emulator (or
scripts, as your terminal emulator names them).
Once I strip all of the comments from the OPS Rule, which was created by
EASYRULE, I get:
)MSG IEC988I
)PROC
Return DELETE
Doesn't get any simpler than that, but still the messages keep being displayed.
I added a trace command to the rule, and it is definitely being used.
Gadi
-Original
Thank You, That was exactly the DATA AREA I was looking for.
Thanks
Ms. Terri E. Shaffer
terri.e.shaf...@jpmchase.com
z/OS Engineer
J.P.Morgan Chase Co.
GTI ECS Enterprise Software Engineering (ESE) or Extreme Software Engineering
Office: # 614-213-3467
Cell: # 412-519-2592
-Original
'SYS1.PARMLIB(MPFLSTxx)'
snip
Since upgrading to z/OS 1.13 (our previous version was 1.11), We're receiving
many IEC988I messages issued by CA-SPOOL (v11.7).
The response from CA was that there was a change made in z/OS 1.12, and this
message occurs because CA-SPOOL is attempting to close a
My bad. Turns out it's not enough to put the new char[] in the program, you
have to put it where it actually gets executed. :-(
15C56358 0070CEEV#GH 1542C620 +
operator new(unsigned int)
In easy rule you can set several suppression.
Suppress from Console,
Suppress from Syslog
And so forth.
Do you want only console, syslog or both?
Second thing you can do is go to OPSBROWSE (Option 1) and filter on IEC988I.
Put your cursor on the IEC988I and see what OPS/MVS sees and what it
And I think it should have been
Return SUPPRESS
Not
Return DELETE
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
On entry to each SMS Class (DATA, MANAGEMENT, STORAGE, and STORAGE GROUP) you
can enter the name of the SCDS dataset
to use. I would use the dataset name of the copy from the original LPAR, which
I believe is what you want. By using the SCDS
dataset name it should pull up the existing class
Matthew,
AFAIK, that way you only edit and save them in that CDS, but do not pull them
into another CDS.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Matthew Stitt
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 16:03
To:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:07:03 +, Shaffer, Terri E wrote:
I have modified our IEFUSI in our shop to increase the number of dataspaces
allowed - sub word 1:
...
Sub-word Contents
1 Default data space and hiperspace size. It is
specified in
Having a problem with IEAVMXIT(exit routine)
I need to get diagnostic info when this exit executes. It is in a test
LPAR so not that much going on there.
What's the best way to debug this exit?
Thanks.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:34:15 -0700, John Norgauer
john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu wrote:
Having a problem with IEAVMXIT(exit routine)
-snip-
What's the best way to debug this exit?
Of course, it depends on what you are trying to figure out. I will offer some
reverse advice: don't use WTO to
z/XDC from Colesoft.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Norgauer
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Debugging IEAVMXIT
Having a problem with IEAVMXIT(exit routine)
I
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:59:33 -0500, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
CFSIZER is all about structure sizes based on CFCC level. Dump space and
size of the control code isn't suggested - at least the last time I ever
looked at it.
I stand corrected. The IBM recommendation for dump space
You could use our Trap Diagnostic Facility product for this. The Break Hook
facility can be used to dynamically hook the exit and you can specify the
job/task name of a single task that you want to trap and use to debug. All
other callers of the exit continue to execute as normal.
Chuck Arney
Without procuring a software product not already in house, I suggest using
native z/OS SLIP trace. You can follow the execution path, capture
registers and data, and even--though risky--alter exit logic to test
fixes/improvements, all without paper work rigamarole. No intention to
demean any
A little off topic, and not a technical issue, but I figured this would be a
likely crowd...
Anyone still have a Shark fin, and might be persuaded to part with it for some
reasonable consideration?
Thanks in advance!
-Ben
--
I tried return SUPRESS too.
Niether worked.
Gadi
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler [stars...@mindspring.com]
Sent: 10 October 2013 15:56
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IC988I messages
Two additional hints:
the output goes to CEEMSGS, and:
this is not meant for production work, of course,
because the use of CEL4MCHK makes your application really slow;
it's only for diagnosing memory leak problems.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 10.10.2013 19:34, schrieb Bernd Oppolzer:
To
Used DSS to backup the RACF databasefrom TEST lpar..
wanting to restore---new name---but ensure the new name is cataloged on
the TEST lpar's mastercat
can I---jcl--poit to the mastercat as a user cat to make this occur??
--
3) use the ISMF Copy line command and, on the next panel, enter the target SCDS
dataset name with the desired (same or different) Class name. This works for
all the class panels tho' the StorGrp panel will *not* copy the volume list to
the target SCDS.
For example, I have
Ron,
You can user a ALIAS to point to the new master catalog and then perform
an IDCAMS alter on the new master catalog to alter to the real name or
just restore without catalog (along as it is non-sms) and then issue a
DEFINE NONVSAM on the new master catalog using IDCAMS.
Craig
From:
tks Craig
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
only for the use of the individual or
Hello,
I have created a LDS, Its the main catalog volume where I have created this
COMMDS,ACDS,SCDS. I was able to bring up the system but when I try to use
ISMF 8.3 to alter the base configuration i get the CDS is not found though
it is very much visible via D SMS,OPTIONS and when i do SETSMS
Is there really a reason to call a z/OS MEMORY ERROR a LEAK???
It's an ERROR. I know the Open Systems guys love to hide behind
words that make it NOT seem to be their error, but why us???
Barry
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
You didn't say what you are going to do with the RACF DB on the TEST LPAR, but
if you are going to use it as a RACF database and if the name is different than
what is currently used on TEST, be sure to update ICHRDSNT.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
is there not a display to the racf name being used??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
Yep---did that thanks
From: Bob Shannon bshan...@rocketsoftware.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 10/10/2013 01:24 PM
Subject:Re: RACF
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
You didn't say what you are going to do with the RACF DB on the
Are you looking at syslog or system console or other?
What do you see in opt 1 in ops vs when you put the cursor on the message and
hit enter
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: גדי בן אבי gad...@malam.com
Sent: Oct 10, 2013 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IC988I
Is there an indicator if DFSORT is using the ziip engine and how much?? or
what is being put there??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally
Hi Ron,
zIIP usage is recorded in type 30 records. If you have SAS I can send
you some code to dig it out and print it.
On 10/10/2013 2:42 PM, Ron Wells wrote:
Is there an indicator if DFSORT is using the ziip engine and how much?? or
what is being put there??
--
-- Jim Blalock
z/OS
that would be good...
was wondering...the doc I have been reading refers to DFSORT and DB2
util's...
nothing on DFSORT enable to use zIIP on its own??
Is there some PARM
OR
CONTROL CARDS NEED TO ENABLE??
From: Jim Blalock ca...@clemson.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 10/10/2013
Barry Merrill wrote:
begin extract
Is there really a reason to call a z/OS MEMORY ERROR a LEAK??? It's
an ERROR. I know the Open Systems guys love to hide behind words that
make it NOT seem to be their error, but why us???
end extract/
and I strongly agree that the use of euphemisms for what
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:04:52 -0500, Scott Fagen scottfagen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Reliable as in not available all the time or reliable as in gives wrong
answers? If the latter, it would be odd, as last I knew, the application
behind the webpage actually asked a current CF what the right size
I believe the industry standard term for that particular type of memory error
is leak.
Charles
Composed on a mobile: please excuse my brevity
Barry Merrill ba...@mxg.com wrote:
Is there really a reason to call a z/OS MEMORY ERROR a LEAK???
It's an ERROR. I know the Open Systems guys love to
On 2013-10-10 14:08, Barry Merrill wrote:
Is there really a reason to call a z/OS MEMORY ERROR a LEAK???
It's an ERROR. I know the Open Systems guys love to hide behind
words that make it NOT seem to be their error, but why us???
Barry
Another term I recall being used in the mainframe
On 2013-10-10 13:08, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
A little off topic, and not a technical issue, but I figured this would be a
likely crowd...
Anyone still have a Shark fin, and might be persuaded to part with it for some
reasonable consideration?
Thanks in advance!
-Ben
These folks might be
Looks like you need to have a minimal SMS configuration like to define some
basic Storage Group,Storclas, Data Class, Management Class. Then translate
and activate...
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:36 PM, mf db dbajava...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have created a LDS, Its the main catalog volume
To add for the data set missing. You must be looking in your LISTCAT and
See if there are any Aliases are defined foryour First HLQ(It could be that
your system might have Multi-Level Aliases set up)...
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Jake anderson justmainfra...@gmail.comwrote:
Looks like
Gord,
Ben is looking for a shark fin. I know where one is lurking, but the keeper
won't let it go.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gord Tomlin
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 2:17 PM
To:
Ron Wells wrote:
Used DSS to backup the RACF databasefrom TEST lpar..wanting to
restore---new name---but ensure the new name is cataloged on the TEST lpar's
mastercat
can I---jcl--poit to the mastercat as a user cat to make this occur??
Craig gave you good advice (plus the needed comment
I don't know about DFSORT, we use Syncsort here. Syncsort uses the zIIP
automatically if it finds one. We also have CA-IDMS, which can use a
zIIP since 16.0 or so, but you have to tell it to use it.
The SMF30 processor section contains two main values: the real time
spent by a job on the
tks -- Jim
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
only for the use of the individual or
BTW: we had a weird but not uncommon situation just in the last few days,
where a memory leak of only 32 bytes (allocated some 500 times) lead to
a short-on-storage termination of an address space of 512 MB.
This was due to the following allocation pattern:
there were some large areas allocated
(We don't yet have 2.1, so I can't experiment.)
There was plenty discussion here of the new-fangled facility to
support symbol resolution in instream data sets, but I don't
recall whether this specifically was discussed:
What will happen (JES2, specifically) if substituting a symbol in
an
There was plenty discussion here of the new-fangled facility to support symbol
resolution in instream data sets, but I don't recall whether this specifically
was discussed:
What will happen (JES2, specifically) if substituting a symbol in an instream
data set causes a record to exceed the
Oh how I wish there was just an option for the JCL stream to be
RECFM=VB,LRECL=255 (or more).
Can't be MORE until we can edit MORE interactively.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 20:33:37 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Oh how I wish there was just an option for the JCL stream to be
RECFM=VB,LRECL=255 (or more).
Can't be MORE until we can edit MORE interactively.
I think you're out of date, Ted. From the ISPF edit help:
quote
You can edit members of
On 2013-10-10, at 14:28, Roberts, John J wrote:
What will happen (JES2, specifically) if substituting a symbol in an
instream data set causes a record to exceed the otherwise LRECL (over which
the programmer now has little control)?:
Oh how I wish there was just an option for the JCL
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 20:33:37 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Oh how I wish there was just an option for the JCL stream to be
RECFM=VB,LRECL=255 (or more).
Can't be MORE until we can edit MORE interactively.
Broaden your horizons; try a better editor. And I rely on long
SYSIN records largely when
Gee, I agree with John. I must be having a mellow day.
Seriously, I don't think leak absolves blame. If you had a water leak it
would definitely be a fault, not a situation. Leak seems to perfectly
characterize what happens: the region has lots of free memory, the program
runs for a while, and
Ditto. I think they like 'leak' because they have no decent tools (in too
many cases, not all!) to diagnose it. I see teams do things like Run this
for a week and see if it runs out of memory, rather than Run it for 1M
iterations, measure memory before, during, and after. What, they think
that
My preferred term is 'programming error'
Cliff McNeill
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:33:04 -0400
From: zedgarhoo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: How diagnose potential memory leaks with LE?
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Ditto. I think they like 'leak' because they have no decent tools (in too
I have used z/OS SLIP trace for batch assembler programs, but not an exit.
Is there any issue with an exit and using SLIP?
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
1651 Alhambra Blvd
Suite 200
Sacramento, Ca
FWIW, MS Visual Studio 2010, which I use for editing and alpha testing, has
excellent memory leak diagnosis facilities.
You can turn on leak monitoring, and unlike LE, the overhead is low enough
that you can leave it on through most testing.
Here's the error from my abandoned new char[99]:
Finding that Charles agrees with me is more than a little
disconcerting, but I console myself by reflecting that it is very
unlikely to happen again during 2013 and probably not even in 2014.
Taken seriously, as of course it should/need not be, Cliff's
suggestion is too generic. 'Memory leak'
And Linux has the excellent valgrind. We had talks with IBM wrt porting purify
to z/OS but nothing came of it. Unfortunately, the z/OS tools are expensive and
buggy. DebugTool stands out as one of the worst products I've ever used.
On 11/10/2013, at 5:47 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
I don't recall using it for this particular exit, but I've used it for
others. The doc on setting up a SLIP trace is pretty good. You run GTF
trace with TRACE=SLIP. If you have trouble locating the module, try using
SETPROG to load it in LPA:
setprog
Thanks Skip for the primer on SLIP.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
1651 Alhambra Blvd
Suite 200
Sacramento, Ca 95816
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! JN
I had this exact problem during the Early Support Program for z/OS 2.1. I ran
an IDCAMS step, where, after substitution, the IDCAMS control statement went
past column 72. Here's the error I got:
IDC3302I ACTION ERROR ON TECH008.TECH008Z.JOB01701.
D101.?
In
!!AAAYAJXIDufoOyhGhgKtFLrs5tbCgAAAEHI7KS/+C9BNjjGRhlPmgjoBAA==@optonline.net,
on 10/09/2013
at 06:44 PM, MichealButz michealb...@optonline.net said:
LOAD DE=LIST_ADDR,LSEARCH=YES
Aha!
CE NOT FOUND FAILED BECAUSE DIRECTORY ENTRY
IS
Forgot to say thanks, Bernd. This looks interesting. I wonder why they have
three of these memory leak reports? (Mine plus yours plus something
called _VHM_REPORT -- see the Vendor Interface manual.) Three mediocre
reports instead of one good one?
Now that I understand the other report I am
In
!!AAAYAJXIDufoOyhGhgKtFLrs5tbCgAAAEPU1UUUgBGdJhXkK6o4AfVgBAA==@optonline.net,
on 10/09/2013
at 09:13 PM, MichealButz michealb...@optonline.net said:
The doc says list_addr okay I'll try name
RCF submitted. Assuming that you meant z/OS MVS Programming:
Assembler
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:57:48 -0500, Peter X. DeFabritus wrote:
I had this exact problem during the Early Support Program for z/OS 2.1. I ran
an IDCAMS step, where, after substitution, the IDCAMS control statement went
past column 72. Here's the error I got:
IDC3302I ACTION ERROR ON
Just to add some remarks:
the report of this mem check heap manager looks almost exactly like
the ValGrind report, which has been mentioned by another poster,
(and we have ValGrind at our site, too, for the Linux variant of our
math package, so I had the chance to compare the reports),
and it
In cb78715f-fcca-4a45-8d91-3c032f907...@optonline.net, on 10/10/2013
at 07:04 AM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net said:
I thought list_addr is that of the BLDL
It is, which is why it is not correct for the DE operand. What you
need is the entry adress, which in your case has a label
In
CAPikFhEBJ_Lx3L_inEwNaYpyy2i22bduLQ-H=ru2y6cg8to...@mail.gmail.com,
on 10/10/2013
at 11:36 PM, mf db dbajava...@gmail.com said:
IGD056I COMMDS SYSTEM.ZT01.COMMDS NOT FOUND
What is the definition of SYSTEM in the master catalof for the new
LPAR? What is the definition of SYSTEM.ZT01.COMMDS?
You need to provide all messages. I suspect you should have seen an IGD070D
or IGD072A message along with the ones you got.
So - if this is a SYSPLEX, not all systems are in sync with the COMMDS
dataset.
There is probably an issue with the way the COMMDS was setup or how your
SYSPLEX/MONOPLEX
In 007a01cec5e3$c3ffeaa0$4bffbfe0$@mxg.com, on 10/10/2013
at 01:08 PM, Barry Merrill ba...@mxg.com said:
Is there really a reason to call a z/OS MEMORY ERROR a LEAK???
Yes.
It's an ERROR.
Yes, but if you're diagnosing an error you want to know the details.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
The doc says list_addr
Where? Not in the doc for the DE parameter of LOAD.
That says list_entry_addr.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
As I basically mentioned, they're not committed to doing anything.
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:44:12 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:57:48 -0500, Peter X. DeFabritus wrote:
I had this exact problem during the Early Support Program for z/OS 2.1. I
ran an
I'm not aware of one that is 'free'.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:56:28
To:
On 10 Oct 2013 06:49:07 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
In easy rule you can set several suppression.
Suppress from Console,
Suppress from Syslog
And so forth.
Do you want only console, syslog or both?
Second thing you can do is go to OPSBROWSE (Option 1) and filter on IEC988I.
On 2013-10-10, at 18:19, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Actually, I don't believe program objects are required to reside in
PDSEs,
They may be allowed in a Unix file, but they are not allowed in a PDS,
not do I see how they could be allowed.
Bits is bits. A UNIX file is simply a flat
Well then...they just don't know how to use the tools they have. Lovely.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:58 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/10/2013 5:47 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
FWIW, MS Visual Studio 2010, which I use for editing and alpha testing,
has
excellent memory leak
87 matches
Mail list logo
