Re: [TSO-REXX] Sdsf rexx

Phoenix has superb support, they should be able to point you to the right places in their manuals. It's usually takes a few additional tricks with the runtime JCL of STCs if you want to siphon off JESMSGLG and/or JESYSMSG > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Job submit using REXX

Hello Carmen, Thanks for reply. My idea is not to spin the active address space logs. I am looking for some automation, So i want to have this active address space logs write into any other output dataset in regular interval. On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Carmen Vitullo

Re: Job submit using REXX

ok, Understand, then I think Lizette's suggestion would work best for you. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "venkat kulkarni" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 2:18:30 PM Subject: Re: Job submit using REXX Hello Carmen,

Re: Job submit using REXX

Hello Group, Is it possible to capture log from any running address space on every regular interval and keep appending to these logs to output dataset using REXX. for example: I run my rexx at 1 AM and it capture logs generated upto 1 AM and write into output dataset . Then I run this rexx at 2

Fwd: [TSO-REXX] Sdsf rexx

Cross posted Lizette, We are using EJES. I think it has its own rexx interface. So finding a way to know the destination based on first character of a Jobname. -- Forwarded message -- From: Lizette Koehler Date: Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:20 AM Subject:

How to capture STC Logs

Hello Group, Is it possible to capture log from any running address space on every regular interval and keep appending to these logs to output dataset using REXX. for example: I run my rexx at 1 AM and it capture logs generated upto 1 AM and write into output dataset . Then I run this rexx at 2

How to capture LOGS of system running tasks (was Job submit using REXX )

This works great if you have a repository like SAR or $AVERS We use this all the time for all STCs. For SYSLOG we use a WTR to spin to Or you can look at SDSF REXX and see if you can build a tool with that. Do a Google Search on JES2DISK by John McKown (on a GIT) and it would be a good

Re: [TSO-REXX] Sdsf rexx

This is a SDSF/REXX clist that extracts sysout datasets with names S* on the ST queue and archives them to datatsets. It can be adapted to extract datasets with other criteria. /* REXX */ TRACE e /*ISFTRACE="ON" */ /*ISFTRMASK="ALL" */ PROFILE NOPREFIX rc=isfcalls('ON') PARSE ARG p1 p2 p3 IF

Re: Job submit using REXX

I[ve never used this but I think the SPIN parameter on the DD statement would work for you SPIN= {NO } {UNALLOC } {(UNALLOC,'hh:mm') } {(UNALLOC,'+hh:mm') } {(UNALLOC,nnn [K|M])} {(UNALLOC,NOCMND) } {(UNALLOC,CMNDONLY) } (UNALLOC,'hh:mm') Indicates that the data set is to be spun at

AW: Re: DFSMSdss Question

>From the DFSMSdss Storage Administration > >TYPRUN=NORUN Note that this is to be specified via EXEC,PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN', not SYSIN -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: Job submit using REXX

if you look in the manual. There's Chapter 11: Utility Programs. looks like every thing is there that you need. Brian On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 1:28 PM, venkat kulkarni wrote: > Hello Lizette, > > I do agree and always grateful to this list to help beginners and will

AW: Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

This thread was one of the most amusing threads I read for a while. It's only a quarter to 9am here, but this was definitely the highlight of the day, not to say the week. Kudos to all of you who have patiently responded to Paul's arguments, trying to convince him he's wrong. --Peter Hunkeler

Come and earn IBM Doc Buddy badges

If you are an active advocate of the IBM Doc Buddy app and have participated in our previous usability tests, you are now entitled to the IBM Doc Buddy contributor badge. Statistics show that LinkedIn members with certifications receive 6x more views to their profile on average. Check out the

JES3 Syslog processing

Hi I am from the JES2 shop. Recently we have a new assignment which is JES3 Shop. Could someone please help me to understand how SYSLOG gets processed in JES3 sysplex environment. Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

(I reached my message quota so I had to pause posting) On Mon, 7 May 2018 14:34:27 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote: >I just realized what is happening. Paul is involved with the rouge You mean "rogue". It's not rogue, it provides a platform to experiment on to produce ideas for

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

>> If high-level language compilers start following >> the 32-bit addressing rules, they will naturally >> start supporting 4 GiB with no additional >> effort by the programmer. > If high level language compilers (and run-time environments) start > following 64-bit addressing rules, they will

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

On Tue, 8 May 2018 06:31:03 -0500, Paul Edwards wrote: >I am asking >for AM64 to be supported to the maximum extent >possible. No you are not. You are asking for a significant enhancement to AMODE(64) code in the operating system to support a very limited enhancement to programs that were

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

In article <2457181938299518.wa.mutazilahgmail@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote: > >>But you are happy to constrain > >>32-bit applications to 2 GiB when all you may > >>need is a LOC=32 parameter and you can go > >>all the way up to 4 GiB. > > No, you also have to run AMODE(64), which means that

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

On Tue, 8 May 2018 05:47:03 -0500, Paul Edwards wrote: >extra baggage of 64-bit programming, with >64-bit addresses stored in memory instead >of 32-bit addresses. This is 2018. Conserving memory isn't nearly as important as it was in 1970. Storing 64-bit addresses isn't a big deal. >It's about

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

On Tue, 8 May 2018 07:24:55 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote: >On Tue, 8 May 2018 05:47:03 -0500, Paul Edwards wrote: > >>extra baggage of 64-bit programming, with >>64-bit addresses stored in memory instead >>of 32-bit addresses. > >This is 2018. Conserving memory isn't

Re: RMM tape init question

Example of how I add a new volume to RMM and then initialize it. //REMOVEV EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01 //SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSTSIN DD * RMM AV MP0121 STATUS(SCRATCH) COUNT(1) DENSITY(*) INITIALIZE(Y) - LABEL(SL) LOCATION(LUMINEX) MEDIANAME(3590) MEDIATYPE(HPCT) - USE(MVS)

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IZUGUTSE ?

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Allan Staller wrote: > Lots of people use XML. It is handy for translating X to Y in a platform > independent manner. > That being said, I would only use XML if forced to by > business/applications constraints. ​Yeah. I like XML because

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IZUGUTSE ?

Yes, Node.js is a charge item, you can get a "Free 90-day trial" of the product though. https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/sdk-nodejs-compiler-zos The charge for the product is: "One-time charge price metric based on Value Units" I have always attempted to AVOID having to deal with billing

Re: CICS and DB2

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Porowski, Kenneth wrote: > Has anyone managed to configure a connection from CICSTS running on z/OS > to a DB2 UDB running on Windows? > Specifically without having to have DB2 on z/OS. > > ​As Lizette indicated, you might get some better

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IZUGUTSE ?

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Nims,Alva John (Al) wrote: > Yes, Node.js is a charge item, you can get a "Free 90-day trial" of the > product though. > https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/sdk-nodejs-compiler-zos > > The charge for the product is: "One-time charge price metric

z/OSMF Ooops

So I was wondering if someone can help, I tried looking at IBM links and couldn’t find what I needed. In my infinite wisdom, HA, I have been running z/OS 2.3 for about 3 months now, and circling back around and reconfigure z/OSMF. There was a directory/SYMLINK at /usr/lpp/zosmf/liberty but

Re: Job submit using REXX

Phil, Per your link: The null queue is only needed if using '*' for the count. In the program posted, the following was used: "EXECIO" QUEUED()" DISKW ISFIN (FINIS" Since the number of records was specified using QUEUED(), then the null record is not needed. Using the QUEUED() is a good

Re: JES3 Syslog processing

Hi We are using DLOG, Is it possible to copy the SYSLOG sysout to a GDG ? Is there any sample JCL to do that ? On Tue 8 May, 2018, 1:59 PM Peter, wrote: > Hi > > I am from the JES2 shop. Recently we have a new assignment which is JES3 > Shop. > > Could someone please

Re: Rant

Hi Carmen, Unfortunately, many products that run on z/OS still don't produce KC4z formatted deliverables. The different teams that own the content make the decision whether to produce KC4z plug-ins, and most of them have not decided to do so yet. Feel free to open requirements to help

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

On May 8, 2018, at 8:45 AM, John McKown wrote: > > Personally, if I wanted to be "pushy", I'd be all over the access method > people to make a native AMODE(64) interface to all datasets (i.e. update > BSAM, QSAM, and BPAM), say be extending the ACB somehow. +1.

Re: z/OSMF Ooops

Nevermind.. Thank you with that information, I found liberty_zos under /usr/lpp , what was missing was the mount for the file system Thank You!! Ms Terri E Shaffer Senior Systems Engineer, z/OS Support: ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com​

Re: JES3 Syslog processing

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Peter wrote: > Hi > > We are using DLOG, > > Is it possible to copy the SYSLOG sysout to a GDG ? > ​I would think, from some minor reading, that it would be the same as in JES2. The SYSLOG is just a SPOOL data set. You can use the IBM

Re: Knowledge Centre - (was Re: Rant)

Hi Elardus, Wow, you're even more expensive than my babysitter! Never mind. ;-) I completely agree that it would be nice if all products that run on z/OS could provide content in the same downloadable format and that it's all easy to find. In the meantime, I like your idea of a

Re: Rant

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Susan Shumway wrote: > Hi Carmen, > > Unfortunately, many products that run on z/OS still don't produce KC4z > formatted deliverables. The different teams that own the content make the > decision whether to produce KC4z plug-ins, and most of

Re: Knowledge Centre - (was Re: Rant)

https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3IndexFile On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Susan Shumway wrote: > Hi Elardus, > > Wow, you're even more expensive than my babysitter! Never mind. ;-) > > I completely agree that it would be nice if all

Re: Knowledge Centre - (was Re: Rant)

Hi Mike, Good idea, but that index file only serves as a local ToC with links to the PDFs that you've downloaded from https://www.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3Library , which pretty much contains only z/OS elements and features. It's very useful for what it does for

Re: JES3 Syslog processing

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:54 AM, John McKown wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Peter wrote: > >> Hi >> >> We are using DLOG, >> >> Is it possible to copy the SYSLOG sysout to a GDG ? >> > > ​I would think, from some minor reading, that

Re: Knowledge Centre - (was Re: Rant)

Yep, that's exactly what I'm looking for, z/OS Plus IMS, DB2, I know I have CICS, and CICS/FA loaded, but I'd like to have Omegamon, CDC (Infosphere).to name a few. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Susan Shumway" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Re: z/OSMF Ooops

Thanks, Yes I've been doing this for about 33yrs, but I don’t like clutter or MIA links and before I actually did a little more research it looked like a bad reference and my delete finger was in motion. The real issue was when I configured my BPXPRMxx I missed the mount for the liberty_zos

Re: z/OSMF Ooops

Thank you, however maybe that’s why mine was broken, where does the liberty_zos directory live? Ms Terri E Shaffer Senior Systems Engineer, z/OS Support: ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com​ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Re: Rant

Hi Susan, I recall you telling us, or some doc I read about 2.3 and Softcopy librarian no longer being needed, I'd like to see one document type for all IBM documents, so I can move forward with the KC server and away from storing all my doc on a Winders Share. thanks Susan Carmen Vitullo

Re: z/OSMF Ooops

Here is mine on z/OS 2.3 $ ls -l /usr/lpp/zosmf/liberty lrwxrwxrwx 1 05123 Mar 28 16:12 /usr/lpp/zosmf/liberty -> ../liberty_zos/17.0.0.3 $ On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:21 AM, John McKown wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Shaffer, Terri

Re: Rant

Hi Carmen, Definitely consider opening that requirement. More and more users are discovering KC4z as a content repository, so having all the products available in that format will end up benefiting many. -Sue Shumway On 05/08/18 10:52 AM, Carmen Vitullo wrote: Hi Susan, I recall you

Re: z/OSMF Ooops

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Shaffer, Terri < 017d5f778222-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Thank you, however maybe that’s why mine was broken, where does the > liberty_zos directory live? > ​No offence meant, but I take it you're not really familiar with ​UNIX files? The symlink

Re: z/OSMF Ooops

One other piece of advice...dont manually modify IBM provided filesystems such as this. It usually sets you up for trouble down the path...(pun intended). _ Dave Jousma Manager Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

On Tue, 8 May 2018 07:19:41 -0400, Don Poitras wrote: >> 1. Add 20 lines of code to each system >> service so that they switch to AM31 >> themselves instead of requiring the >> program to do it itself. > >And how many lines of code to each system service to move the parms into

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

On Sun, 6 May 2018 21:14:38 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote: > GETMAIN is not going to ever manage 32-bit storage. >I would word you requirement this way: > > " I would like to have a USE2GTO4G=NO|YES >parameter on IARV64 GETSTOR, similar to the already exisiting >USE2GTO32G=NO|YES

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:22 AM, Paul Edwards wrote: > ​ > > > Wow. Suggesting LOC=32 for z/OS is a bannable offence? > ​Yeah, that was a bit extreme, IMO. Given some of the, admittedly strange (even I think they're strange) ideas that _I_ sometimes propose, LOC=32 is

Re: Job submit using REXX

Okay, when writing records from a stack using the EXECIO statement, this is what I mean by writing from the QUEUE. It requires that the last entry on the stack be null to indicate the end of the stack. Here is a link to help you understand.

Re: z/OSMF Ooops

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Shaffer, Terri < 017d5f778222-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > So I was wondering if someone can help, I tried looking at IBM links and > couldn’t find what I needed. > > In my infinite wisdom, HA, I have been running z/OS 2.3 for about 3 months > now,

Re: z/OSMF Ooops

$ find /usr -name liberty_zos/17.0.0.3 /usr/lpp/liberty_zos/17.0.0.3 On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Shaffer, Terri < 017d5f778222-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Thank you, however maybe that’s why mine was broken, where does the > liberty_zos directory live? > > Ms Terri E Shaffer

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

One poster asked for recommendations for a RFE to request that SVC 120 be updated to be compatible with what was needed for a S/360-67 that was announced on 1965-08-16. The discussion resulted in strange discussion about AMODE, unrelated architecture changes, unrelated program changes,