OK, I had to respond to that misconception wrt e1000 BMCs. :-)
The real reason that a separate MAC (sometimes a separate NIC) was
provided for BMC traffic on some new Intel motherboards was that there
are more features being put onto the management NIC than just port 623
can handle (HTTP,
Tim,
Writing FRU data is usually done in discrete sections which have
variable length, so it should be done with care.
The ipmiutil package does have all the tools together in a meta-command
now ('ipmiutil'), see http://ipmiutil.sf.net/ for release 1.8.0 or
greater, and any other input is
reasonable defaults for the LAN
parameters that are needed, if you run it locally.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: sanjay verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:43 AM
To: Cress, Andrew R
Cc: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ipmitool-devel] HP
Using the IPMI LAN interface from the local OS is never supported,
regardless of what hardware you have.
Andy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
venkata kishore
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 5:45 AM
To: venkata kishore;
losing performance to
throttling.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Mark Mackey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 4:54 AM
To: Cress, Andrew R
Cc: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Missing sensors on Intel
Cress, Andrew R wrote:
Attached
Frank,
It doesn't appear that you were root when you tried the set commands.
Does it work if you log in as root or use sudo?
When you used the lan 2 command, it defaulted to user 1.
When you used the user 5 command, it tried to set user 5. Does the SMDC
have 5 users? Perhaps you should stick
If the server won't respond to Get Channel Authentication Capabilities
(the first IPMI LAN request, required by the IPMI spec), then either the
IPMI LAN isn't configured, or it doesn't support IPMI LAN.
You would have to check locally on the server to see if IPMI LAN is
configured or not.
Andy
Message-
From: Fred Skrotzki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:45 AM
To: Cress, Andrew R; Song, Youquan
Cc: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Ipmitool-devel] IPMI SOL failed on Intel Harwich
Andy,
A somebody who lerks to learn. It's a shame you
The two system have entirely different IPMI BMCs on the board.
They each have their own IPMI firmware on the BMC.
Also, the FRU SDR records applied would vary by vendor.
You can see the BMC vendor product IDs from GetDeviceID ('ipmitool mc
info' or 'ipmiutil health').
Andy
-Original
That must be the ipmi0 kernel thread, which is used for the local IPMI
system interface, but is not needed for IPMI LAN access. The IPMI LAN
accesses the BMC firmware directly, not using the main CPU.
Andy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Federico,
It sounds like it is time to call HP support to find out if this Aelita
Software BMC on the HP DL 140 really supports IPMI 1.5 LAN, or just some
non-standard subset of that.
If it does, then HP must know what the configuration tricks are to set
it up.
Andy
-Original Message-
In general, one way to get the BMC back to default behavior is to remove
the power plug for about 10 seconds. It is a brute-force way of doing
BMC reset, plus, unlike a BMC reset command, it doesn't get the BMC out
of sync with the BIOS.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The SOL for IPMI 1.5 is a different (OEM) protocol, whereas SOL for IPMI
2.0 is in the spec.
Intel supplies a CLI rpm to support SOL with the S*WV2 platforms (dpccli
console command).
I didn't think that ipmitool supported IPMI 1.5 OEM SOL.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Check dmidecode to see if it puts out a type 38 (IPMI) record.
If so, the Base Address should be listed there.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
A. Ranch
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:25 PM
To: Kurt Yoder
Cc:
Does #pragma pack(1)/#pragma pack() work for this case with gcc 4.3.1?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filion, Stéphane
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 2:05 PM
To: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Ipmitool-devel]
John,
Check the IPMI version by running ipmitool mc info.
If it is IPMI 2.0, proceed.
If it is IPMI 1.5, then SOL is not supported on that blade.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Morrissey
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 4:20 PM
Three things to check:
Is the IPMI LAN channel enabled?
Is the admin user enabled for the LAN channel?
Is the BMC IPMI 1.5 or IPMI 2.0?
Andy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Choi,
Paul
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:12 AM
To:
channels are there?
ipmitool channel info N
will show the IPMI channels, where N=1,2,3, etc. and the LAN channels
will have Medium Type = 802.3 LAN.
Andy
From: Choi, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 1:34 PM
To: Cress, Andrew R; ipmitool
My sincere apologies for the error in cross-posting the ipmiutil message
yesterday.
The two addresses start with the same characters, and I let outlook
resolve it incorrectly.
Andy Cress
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by
19 matches
Mail list logo
