before u all rush to get the JDK 116 port to the redhat 5.0 ALPHA box,
my ISP has sent me this nasty-gram regarding excessive web access usage
( see attached ) . ergo, when my 250 meg transfer limit is reached for
the month, that will be it for the month.
ANYWAY:
the JDK comes in two parts
there will be ports, if there will be src. i guess its up to sun/javasoft to
say yay/nay.
gat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> will there be a jdk1.2 port in the near future (even for the betas)? I'd
> like to use collections and I'm not willing to switch to NT :-(
>
> cheers,
>
> Gabor
>
> --
mine does not
gat
Diego Ramiro Gomez Deck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to know if any Linux port support native threads.
>
> TIA,
> Diego.class
i tried at one time to use posix-threads(pthreads) on alpha. u can match up
some of the functionality, but in reality sun uses, well , sun-threads, and
their enhancements. there was a small talk on the diff's, i think one of
them was the ability to start/stop/pause any thread.
other difficulties w
sometimes it happens that the libs/loader libs are not found be the kern. this
happened to me when i went from 4.1 to 5.0. never figured out why, but those
executable were just not runnable on 5.0 :(
B. Craig Taverner wrote:
> > explicitly specified the file (i.e. "./java"). I always get "comm
yup,
My first attempt to fix this was to change the way the internal java
stack was organised. stack items are 64 bits wide ( due to pointers )
rather than doubled and longs, which on a 32 bit world occupy 2 stack
slots. So while i can store a double, long, and a pointer into a 64 bit
alpha st
is it avail Free, or as a trial/demo test?
John Collins wrote:
> Has anyone gotten SuperMojo to work? I've got RedHat 5.0, jdk1.1.5v7.
> Lots of other Java stuff works. The two things that aren't working are
> SuperMojo (brand new, version 1.3) and Together/J (also brand new,
actually, library calls are over-rided, not system-calls. If u are savey enough, u can
call the system service yourself, and forget the library
interface ( ie instead of using select, try __select ). But in doing so, the green
threading ( fake threads ) can be comprimised, ie other threads
wont
I suspect at this time it is a hard coded limit in java/vm. Not just for
sockets in particular, but for the sum of all opened channels
gat
Charles Forsythe wrote:
> Fellow Java Linux users:
>
> I have a simple client/sever benchmark (code below) designed to see how
> many simultanious open socket
maybe i should have more clearly stated, thats for java/vm/linux. the "C"
interface to the os has been "enhanced" to work with linux et al. That
limit need not be there, i guess its just another ti=hing to look at
gat
Charles Forsythe wrote:
> > I suspect at this time it is a hard coded limit in
As I rem, it was Karl that wanted blackdown to step down from hosting due to
influence from the real bandwidth owners of blackdown.
Marcus Johnson wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Christopher Seawood wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Marcus Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, yes, but will some
did i miss something, OSF, & linuxthreads ? arent they different critters?
gat
Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> There is also OSF's JDK, which is a 1.1.6 JDK with linuxthreads
> support.
>
it is most likely trying to run the "lp" as in ( i tyhink) "/usr/bin/lp"
which doesnt exist there under redhat. u can symbolically link the lp's
together.
Laura L. Evangelista wrote:
> Sir,
>
> I tried to run your sample application "TestPrint" but it
> wouldn't print anything ... The print
i'd be interested in the enhancements to the 'c' debugger to support
threads.
gat
Bernd Kreimeier wrote:
> I got a statement from Vania Joloboff regarding
the jni for the alpha wasn't built ( as it has to bee in assembler ) until v10
of 115. The include files are also with v10. I dont have too much experience
with the JNI, but it does appear to work with 32 bit int/floats, and 64 bit
long/double's/addresses.
should be somewhere in http://www.voicen
sorry, not on that list. i tried at one time ( long time ago) , but just
didn't get in.
the porting list is not even advertised! there also doesnt seem to be an
archive list there either.
so who is to know?
so i guess the ans is no.
from ur inquiry, i suppose there is an effort to produce a sta
BTW, yes i'd like one copy, if its being offered?
BUT
I have limited disk space from the ISP ( 10 megs ) for all my web stuff,
the java port is takeing near half. they wont give more than 10 ( unless
u give more $ ) , and they enforce it as u transfer it to the ftp-only (
to me - htt
interesting the things people do. i myself have not tried what ur doing,
but i suppose it is suppose to work. i'll have a look see. i suspect that
it is mainly a prob trying to find where the root dir to the lib.so are,
there is no libdl function that will do it . ( i suspect ). a hack was
made, a
I do,
I do have a 116. But like most things the AWT doesn't work like the awt
from 115.
I have also tried the egcs ( alternate cc compiler for the alpha ). with
this compiler I can use byte/short machine instructions which should
speed up things. Interestingly enough though, the egcs compiled jav
-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Sat, 29 Aug 1998 10:59:52 -0400
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Edwards)
Organization:
Codonics, Inc.
To:
java-linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Uncle George -
I'm having a pro
ur missing the path pointer to alternate shared libs - LD_LIBRARY_PATH
so
try:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
presuming that /usr/local/lib is where the libXm.so is stashed.
gat
Kerry Boguszewski-Odom wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to get Java running on an AlphaStation 200 runn
i have no access to 1.2, other than the 386 ports that javasoft beta's
out.
RH 4.1 ???, i'm surprised that 116, built on redhat 5.0 would work at
all??? The library call dladdr() wasn't even avail at 4.1 time, which is
now used to figure out where the parentage of the .so library is
anyway - whe
i'd like to know also.
Simon Billingsley wrote:
> Hi Karl,
> What happended with the java-linux.org stuff ? It was all going ok and then
wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, Uncle George wrote:
> >can u tell me where it hurts ?
> >
> >
Canadian pizza, i dont think so . :-))) ( at least not for me. as i
dont think anyone can match the garlic pizza from manville, n.j ( yes the former
asbestos capital ))
gat
James Seigel wrote:
> You guys rockcan we send pizza to you anywherE?
>
Randy Chapman and
Steve Byrne & Uncle George
java.vendor.url= http://java.blackdown.org/java-linux.html
java.version = gat:09/22/98-22:20
java.class.version = 45.3
os.name= Linux
os.version = 2.0.33
os.arch= alpha
VolanoMark version = 1.0
Messages sent
would that be www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/JDK
some others have offered to stash away the stuff before the voicenet
bandwidth police got after me
can someone tell him where its can also be found?
gat
Todd Allen wrote:
> Your web page appears to be inaccessible. Is the Linux-Alpha port of JDK
> stil
Ugg, jet another version to ascend to.
cant wait till december, when 1.2 will be out
gat
Ulrich Kortenkamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today (or yesterday) the solaris and windows versions of the jdk 1.1.7
> were released. Is the porting team already porting this?
>
> BTW: Many thanks for your great work
interesting, considering that 1.2 isn't out yet. U got a mole in the sun
organization?
gat
just ;)
Steve Byrne wrote:
> Right. I've known projects that have done this and won big. Creating objects
> is somewhat expensive because it's a synchronous operation, and synchronized
> operations are s
i was just trying to see some of the probs in doing a "Native" port of the java 116
jdk.
Its one thing to try to get ur task ( java ) done, without having to go to other
software
packages to get it to go also ( like gdb, libdl.so, lesstiff ( a while back ), ld ) .
Since it seems possible ( as it
the moment
gat
Bill Roman wrote:
> Uncle George wrote:
> >
> > it was compiled with egcs 1.1a, and -mcpu=21164a
> >
> >
> > Wes Nakamura wrote:
> >
> > > I've got an XL300, so it should be a 21164 (what's the difference
> > > betw
Bec of the limited space & bandwidth, I was thinking of providing a
redhat rpm for the various alpha platforms ( 21064, 21164, and the
21164a processors ). I'd like to create the rpm, and submit the rpm to
redhat for their inclusion into the jewel set distribution.
Am i violating the bin license,
Bec of the limited space & bandwidth, I was thinking of providing a
redhat rpm for the various alpha platforms ( 21064, 21164, and the
21164a processors ). I'd like to create the rpm, and submit the rpm to
redhat for their inclusion into the jewel set distribution.
Am i violating the bin license,
same here, but in reality it was that admin that was a lot faster than
production - ie the paperwork was ready, but the source wasn't - oh well
gat
BTW, i looked at the POSTed on the archives ( it didn't seem to make it on the
list itself for me ) about the JIT from metrowerks. It seems a littl
ts of other peripheral programs quickly.
gat
BTW the demo's are now a part of the JDK 117 src pkg.
Uncle George wrote:
> its not surprising to me, but there is no demos directory that comes with the
> jdk source from javasoft et al. if its packaged somewhere else, can u tell me?
>
i suppose this has something with the prob that i was having with drawImage of
demo/molecule viewer. At initialization time, a shared seg is created between the
client & X server to communicate the images u wanna draw - BUT it is a fixed size,
which is based upon ur first image. Guessing, from my
I suppose they are, but i dont know for sure - the folks at voicenet.com dont
tell me when i have reached the 250mb/month xfer quota. Nor do they tell me when
the web site will be (or even if they will be ) reconnected.
There was an offer for putting the my ver of Alpha port on blackdown.org, but
can anyone give him a hand with the port.
H. Paul Haiduk wrote:
> --
> Can you give me a URL for Uncle George or for
> anyone else involved
> in the Linux port to the Digital Alpha platform?
> It seems that the
> URL: http://www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/JDK/ is now
>
actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya thunkit )
i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all processors with 117, and see
if it all will fit under 10 meg. these processors are ( 21064, 21164,
and 21164a ).
at the moment i am having probs with finding a home. The folks at
blackdown
what is habanero???
gat
> But found some problems when trying to use habanero on top of it.
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 11:45:59 -0400
From: Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: None Avail
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: 1 , 2
what would the "deal" be for this utilization of the blackd
u have my permission to post all those emails on this list. i'd like to see them
myself. I
think the previous offer was " who would u like to support ( with regard to the linux
porting project takeover ) u or the guy from javaworld ( i think ), i beleive my ans
was
neither. The previous dialog
Yes folks ( I think ) it ready for prime time. There was a binary
version v1, but there was an awt problem that showed up in the ide
"supermojo" ( i have no connection, AND have only a demo model ), and
has been superceeded by the binary files version v2. The classes file is
still version v1.
I H
is swim motif avail ( free ? )
Eric Bohm wrote:
> I just upgraded to the jdk117_alpha21164a_bin and am having trouble
> with some of the demo programs seg faulting or aborting while using
> SWiM Motif.
>
technically we are to change only the platform dependent code - hands tied
by license. Ur improvement would not fit into that catagory :( . PLEASE
file away at javasoft.
BTW this does not mean that it wont be used, or benefit those here. I have
no problem with this being posted here
gat
Ernst de
isn't a graduate trainee an undergraduate? sorry that this doesn't
answer your question, but your signature seemed interesting.
Karthik Vishwanath wrote:
> | Graduate trainee, |
> |
with a site name like sun, u cant ask the sun folks in the US for help ?
well, a long time ago, to begin the port, u take the classes from a done
port, and place them in the directories where the build would put them.
I would also protect the classes from erasure while building, and also
making s
tried looking for the non-commercial license, and its terms - have u folks seen
that document? it seems that the "press release" relates to the commercial
aspects of the licensing/openness but not the non-comm's
gat
Jaco Greeff wrote:
> Visited the pages just now... the new pages are up. Wow! (A
i guess thats an oops,
motif for linix/alpha can be found at www.metrolink.com, and
not at www.metrowerks.com ( cant imagine why i got confused!)
sorry
gat
Javasoft, sometime in december, did begin to grant non-commercial access
to the 1.2 source. ( I submitted the form for the jdk 117 non-comm
license, but wrote on the form that the request is for the JDK 1.2
sources. )
I got the sources, and have worked on it to get to work on my NEW i386
As i said i dont know ( knew ? ) about DPS. The call that uses DPS has
been edited out ( ie no shared link undefines ) when this font/shared
lib is loaded in. So now i know, so i'll see if its avail.
gat
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Gnu announced in May (http://www.gnu.org/bulletins/bull24.html) tha
, I'm honestly not positive whether it took or not, since I
> can't get it up as window manager. However, I don't have the libXm.so
> error anymore (Thank you Uncle George!!). Now I have the following, and
> I'm really not at all sure where to start looking:
>
> %
in reality, select() was universal to all kerns' !. poll() was software
emmalated in the 2.0.xx series. poll() was the orig choice of system call,
but history took a different turn on the linux boxes, where the functi
onality of poll had to be recreated so that most of the linux world would
run on
Are u folks aware that you wont get an EAGAIN/SIGIO sequence if there is no
avail socket buffer space ? on an O_NONBLOCK socketed fd, if u writev too
many characters ( approx 260k worth), u
1) get only a partial write ( ~~60k chars )
2) Try to write the other chars on the next writev() gets you
got the alpha 2.0.36 kernel from redhat 5.2/updates for alpha
still got the problem. Attached is a demo ( client/server) program that
demonstrates the loss of the SIGIO interrupt after a few EAGAIN failures. I do
not know why the loss, but for most of the failures there is a I "have no more
buffe
I have completed my ( initial ) port of the JAVA JDK 1.2 NON-COMMERCIAL
sources from SUN. I only have 10 megs of ( FREE ISP ) disk space, and
therefor the sources, and the demo pieces cannot be found in the kit.
These pieces can be extracted from SUN's jdk.
The port can be found at:
www.
I do not think that there is a port, but rather an effort. i do not know
whats going on, but I can help in some regart to the port effort.
gat
Joel Shellman wrote:
> ail bounced. And the fact is I'm rather desparate.
>
> I saw Rob's post regarding Java on the BeOS and it renewed
> my hopes. Is th
Sun does not support me in my attempts to get JAVA/Linux for Digital Alpha.
No Hardware, No telephone/fax/email support, and no Java Compatability Kit.
Nor has SUN attempted to do so with the whole Linux developer community.
Gerald Gutierrez wrote:
> So what exactly did SUN do when they spoke of
i have a v3 of the non-com java port to the Digital Alpha. Someone gave me the
JavaCC ( jet another compiler compiler ) to try, and it failed to completely write
out one of the tables. ( one of Suns char to byte routines was broken - so much for
the JCK ). any way are u folks still offering some f
Fonts have changed. From my look jdk1.2 want to really use scaleable
fonts/type1 fonts/truetype fonts. Scaleable fonts from X are the ones with
0-0-0-0 in them ( as this is the criteria used by jdk1.2)
type1&truetype are suppose to be from the OPENWIN directory, which is "" in my
build. There is a
Gee -static to create a shared .so file ? maybe u wanna look at -shared !
> > libHelloNative.so: HelloNative.c HelloNative.h
> > gcc -c -o libHelloNative.so \
> > -static \
> > -I/usr/java/include \
> > -I/usr/java/include/genunix \
> >
My diffs would get u started with the i386 port, it was the i386/easy/first
step port to get my 64 bit port done. if that what u want to do
u can ask me some q's about the src.
gat
David Reeves wrote:
> Ito jdk1.2. The question is it possible to get the current diff's for
> the jdk1.2 or at lea
i Guess ur soul is ok
Christopher Rowan wrote:
> I saw a similar article somewhere else that got on my nerves.
>
> Don't let 'em steal your thunder!
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
> On Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:36:01 -, James D. Carr wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >the class and source files (like I assume a lot of people do). My main
> >problem is a slow and sometimes unstable link to the Internet, so
> >downloading a 24MB file might take several attempts.
>
I think u need to
Thank you,
But these are bugs in the tests distributed with the non-comm licenses.
If you dont want to repair the source defects, let me know - I will post them in my
release notes
that i distribute with my JDK 1.2 port.
thanks for ur time
gat
Kevin Ryan wrote:
> Thanks for your comments. You s
I think u will be placing your foot in the look&feel pool of muck. It may very
well be legal, and then again not. I dont believe its a licence u'll be
violating, but rather copyright infringement. Does MICROSOFT exclusively own the
graphics used to present the graphical context. In either case, i
U just cant wait to bleed. Looks like 6.0 wont be released until may 10
In reality 2.1 appears to be a tiger with a different set of stripes, and
personality. glibc cheating ( oops hacking ) will have to be redone/or
relearned !
gat
Tom McMichael wrote:
> fhave gone unanswered ... some have sai
What was more interesting about the proj is that they say there is little to do
for any cpu architecture to get it to run. :-
gat
Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
> Nelson Minar wrote:
>
> > >When Sun formerly stated that Hotspot would be a commercial product
> > >there was not much competition ar
For myself, as the lone alpha-linux porter, is that the new model is very different
from the non-commercial lic agreement. With that agreement I can attempt to make
the JAVA JDK work & distribute to any and all folks that are interested -
FOR NO CHARGE of course.
The New Open license appears to cu
I think you will find time is measured in Jiffies, and not millisecons/microseconds,
or nanoseconds. The only RTC clock is setup to nudge every Jiffy ( 1/60 for the
intel, and 1/1000 for alpha ) . Although u think it is better at 1/1000 - but this
represents 1000 interrupts per second every second
cho faster that 1.2. BUT jdk 1.2/alpha has sound !
Rich Edwards wrote:
> This message is for Uncle George -
>
> We have been using jdk117_v2 very successfully on the Alpha for some
> time now, and are moving towards the 2.2 kernel, and the complete
> RedHat 6.0 system. Unfortun
Actually:
1) I'm running on a Digital Alpha computer, with separate root partitions of
RedHat 5.x & redhat 6.0
2) Netbeans is pure java, so it can run anywhere ( runs mostly anywhere on
my machine :-) )
3) This appears to be a kernel ( RedHat kernel 2.2.5-22 problem ) Where I
suspect that the user
I think ur notion is somewhat short sighted:
1) The source -> free,
2) The Jck -> No so free ( exceeding bogus claim that ur not smart enough to run
the tests, but ur smart enough to port it, which porting, u seem to admit it , is
a difficult task )
3) Distribution -> Not so free.
4) so wheres t
I'm sorry, but u appear to be angry
Calvin Austin wrote:
> Well you have totally missed that point, I was talking about choice of OS
> NT/Solaris/Linux for users, eg
I am aware of what I call "intel centrism". When some one says we ported to NT,
the intel part is always silent. When someone s
I'm sorry for this intrusion,
Is there an example ( concrete to some degree ) of how to make this
happen ? ( was it posted ? )
gat
Rob Clark wrote:
> Chris Abbey wrote:
>
>> But is that memory allocated out of the chunk of VM reserved as the
>> HEAP?
>
--
It really presumes u know a lot about how the stack is organized, how
interrupts/signals are processed, and how u can manipulate pages to become
'executable' with the appropriate linkages and such.
It also presumes u know sparc assembler, of which i do not know.
Otherwise for the most part, it do
Is the pgm avail on-line ?
gat
Paul Grepps wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying the WeatherServer RMI example out of the "Just Java 2" book
> and I'm getting the following exception.
> I
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Its interesting to observer that these native calls appear to be 'IP' calls (
sendpacket, accept, attach, etc... ). it would seem that
they could use the java.net classes to do the work. BUT i suspect that these are fake
Are there specs to these native calls ?
gat
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> On
I have ported the java 1.2 ( but not 1.2.1, or 1.2.2 ) some time in the
beginning of this (1999 ) year my non-comm license will expire in the
middle of december though, and Sun has refused to renew that license, or
offer any other in its place.
gat
/http://www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/Java.html
Jo
NETBEANS worked fairly well under ( alpha ) linux .
gat
Glenn Holmer wrote:
> JBuilder, and NetBeans, because they all run (or will soon) on
> Linux. Can anybody give opinions or sources of info that will
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
I have done a port.
gat
Ilya wrote:
> Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha?
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ERTICAL;
> > users.add( lHost, gbc );
> >
> > gbc.gridheight = 1;
> > gbc.gridwidth = 1;
> > gbc.fill = GridBagConstraints.NONE;
> > users.add( lHostName, gbc );
> > gbc
"Sun announced several course corrections today. For one thing, the company will
remove licensing and royalty payments for the desktop version of the software,
Java 2 Standard Edition, beginning Jan. 31."
gee, maybe i'll be back in the alpha/linux porting business again.
gat
Scott Murray wrote:
Gee, fellas,
Its too bad u didn't feel this way when SUN gave u an exclusive license to
do a COMMERCIAL license. I'd invite u to my life-boat, but there just isn't
enough room.
gat
juergen Kreileder wrote:
> AFAIK Sun has all the right to use our code. But todays press release
> is a slap in th
Any way to get in touch with this guy ? i keep getting Remote host said: 550 This
domain is banned.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com) (209.71.85.41)
by mail12.voicenet.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 1999 08:09:39 -
Sender: gat
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 02:06:40 -0500
From: Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Big-Endian
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
MI
Jeff Galyan wrote:
> Someone suggested that Sun is trying to "fracture" the Linux Java
> community. How does that make any sense? Do you really think Sun cares
> in the least whose VM you're using? All Sun cares about is that *all*
> implementations of Java conform to the spec - otherwise compati
Like many things being offered by SUN, it may very well that the Java Platform
Debugging Architecture (JPDA) was never licensed to Blackdown. I would also
suspect ur argument would be more meritorious if it wasn't for the fact the all
platforms have to be compatable ( as far as JCK is concerned )
I tried getting voicenet UN-banned. but no luck. This will be the last
time i will try to indirectly write a mail to u
"Wolfgang HOSCHEK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>", though no
fault of our own. :-/
But I thought this info may be of some use.
gat
Tried ur benchmark test on my jdk1.2/jd
How come no current "Alpha Information" on java-linux ???
gat
Stephen Wynne wrote:
5.8.1. Alpha Issues
>
> Alpha processor port information.
>
> Last modified:
>
> $Id: alpha.sgml,v 1.1 1999/12/29 07:53:30 stevemw Exp $
>
> 5.8.1.1. Is there an Alpha Port?
>
> Yes, there have been (
Maybe the other regetable thing is that it is written in c++, and not
compiled on Dec Alpha machiines :-{
gat
MARUYAMA Fuyuhiko wrote:
> Hi Renzo and folks!
>
> From: Renzo Pecoraro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Java Decompiler
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 02:11:51 -0500
>
> > Help!
> > I just acci
Sometime, i think in December 1999, there was suggested, in one of Sun's
news blurbs, that you were going to unveil a different JDK licensing
model.
I am in the hope that thie new model, would allow me to continue porting
the JDK1.2 & JDK1.1.x series on to the alpha/linux.
As you may be aware, tha
Has anyone answered ur question ?
Jonah Michaud wrote:
> Hi, does anyone know if there is a port in the works for Alpha (EV56)
> running RedHat 6.0? I saw a message about it from a couple months ago
> and I was wondering if there was any update. I don't see anything about
> it on the JCK page.
I have done a linux/java 1.2 port to alpha
/gat
Jo Uthus wrote:
> Ilya wrote:
>
> | Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha?
>
> I recently attended a seminar where COMPAQ talked about their ongoing
> Linux-work.
>
> The representative said that JDK1.2 would be ready fo
Exactly when was this suppose to happen ? This post is a year old.
"This agreement enables the Linux community
to develop and distribute media-enhanced applications for the Java 2 platform
for non-commercial use. The Blackdown team will serve as a conduit to bring
these Java Media APIs to the ent
The missing piece in ur analysis is that the blackdown group got a commercial
license to do the port. It is a license that sun did not give/grant to me when
i did the Java port to the Digital Alpha computers running Linux. Without that
license, or pre commitment to grant a license, you are wasting
I think this is just passing the buck. Javac should do its 'optimizations' (
whatever they may be ) irrespective of the fact that a JIT might be there (
or any other accellerator/translator ). Nor is there any guarantee that a
JIT will optimize anything in its translations.
Mo DeJong wrote:
In general what u hear are underrun errors ( where the sound device is not
feed fast enough ).
second generalization is that the linux/sound is not a real-time system - an
active swap can really do ur program, as well as the proper feeding of the
device, "in" . Higher priority tasks can also caus
I have not seen this in general, at least not in the java/linux's that i have
created ( for alpha platforms though ) . But then I have been running the
java2demo application, which only ran at 22khz/stereo/16bit. maybe i'll get your
demo pgm, if only i can find a legit ( to have ) mp3 file.
/gat
Did u say u herd clicks ?
If u did, then i dont think that is an underrun problem. The kernel, on
underrun, actually keeps on feeding the device with silence.
The problem with that was the the number of bytes processed by the device, can
become larger that the numbers of bytes the pgm actually
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
