Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Angel Herraez
On 3 Feb 2006 at 0:58, Tamas Horvath wrote: > Indeed they are aligned. So u say that e.g. I can make jmol render model 0 as > static, and all the > others animated? I think Jmol cannot do this; you can see all models superimposed, or you can choose one, or you can get an animation with one at

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Timothy Driscoll
On Feb 2, 2006, at 5:58 p, Tamas Horvath wrote: hi Tamas, are all of your models aligned to your reference structure? if so, you could just add your reference as a separate model in your multi- model file - no need to add it as a chain to every model. Jmol has decent tools to manipulate model

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Tamas Horvath
hi Tamas,are all of your models aligned to your reference structure?  if so, you could just add your reference as a separate model in your multi-model file - no need to add it as a chain to every model.  Jmol hasdecent tools to manipulate models. (there are several tools availablefor aligning model

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Timothy Driscoll
On Feb 2, 2006, at 5:02 p, Tamas Horvath wrote: well.. before I run the simulation, I have a pdb file which contains my reference structure. After md, I create another pdb file with multiple models. Of course I can merge the 2 files, but that would mean I would need to copy my reference s

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Tamas Horvath
Cannot be done.If you are going to load both chains at the same time, and they are logically associated, then it seems to me that they *should* be in thesame file. well.. before I run the simulation, I have a pdb file which contains my reference structure. After md, I create another pdb file with m

Re: [Jmol-users] README.txt file in the distribution

2006-02-02 Thread Angel Herraez
Programmers are too busy improving and implementing our suggestions for the program. That's why the doc's are behind desirable state. I don't know either about all files, but yes fro some. We could collaborate on this documentation through the Wiki. I have just opened a page for it: http://wiki.

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> ok... Let me explain: > I've got a structure at time point 0. This is the reference. I want to > see, > how it changes through time, so I want it to be rendered throughout the > animation. OK, I understand. > I have a simulation, and from that I create a pdb file, that contains many > models,

Re: [Jmol-users] README.txt file in the distribution

2006-02-02 Thread nvervell
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Oh, I would have already if I knew what they all were. :-) > >But other than Jmol.js and Jmol.jar and Jmol.sh I haven't very much of a >clue :-) Ok, I have done a first version. I am committing it under CVS. It's not complete, I hope someone else will modify it Nico -

Re: [Jmol-users] README.txt file in the distribution

2006-02-02 Thread rgb
On Thu, February 2, 2006 2:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>I'd like to see this file expanded to have, even a brief, description of >>each of the files in the distribution. > > Would you be willing to write the descriptions ? Oh, I would have already if I knew what

Re: [Jmol-users] README.txt file in the distribution

2006-02-02 Thread nvervell
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I'd like to see this file expanded to have, even a brief, description of >each of the files in the distribution. Would you be willing to write the descriptions ? Nico --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk In

[Jmol-users] README.txt file in the distribution

2006-02-02 Thread rgb
I'd like to see this file expanded to have, even a brief, description of each of the files in the distribution. Rich --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX se

Re: [Jmol-users] wireframe vs connect

2006-02-02 Thread Timothy Driscoll
On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:00 p, Miguel wrote: On Feb 2, 2006, at 11:32 a, Angel Herraez wrote: 1.- I still think "connect" is more intuitive for changing bond order, but I am not thinking much in terms of distance as Bob, just on selecting the atoms I want to connect-disconect-change. 2.- Apart fr

[Jmol-users] compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Tamas Horvath
Can Jmol read a zipped/jar-ed pdb file?

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> so it is not possible to read and render multiple structures at the same > time? No, reading multiple structures into the same window is not supported. Miguel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log file

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread erson
ı don't want to get mail from jmol how can ı do it. thanks

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Tamas Horvath
ok... Let me explain:I've got a structure at time point 0. This is the reference. I want to see, how it changes through time, so I want it to be rendered throughout the animation.I have a simulation, and from that I create a pdb file, that contains many models, each representing a timepoint. And wh

[Jmol-users] wireframe vs connect

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> Sorry, at this time I really cannot follow all this traffic. > I started the digression about "connect double" etc. in a post (30 > Jan) that seemingly went unnoticed (maybe becuase I changed the > subject line to something more significant). > > To be brief: > > 1.- I still think "connect" is m

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> If I would like to do something like that, where should I start looking in > the source code? Supporting the general case of loading more than one molecular model file is a *huge* job that would impact the entire system. If it were straightforward then it would already have been done. > what

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.48

2006-02-02 Thread Bob Hanson
This command already exists in RasMol/Chime and Jmol. set bonds off Will display all bonds as single order. The command name was poorly chosen in RasMol. carried over to Jmol: set bonds ON/OFF In some file formats (.mol files, for example) the connection data may indicate the bond

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread Angel Herraez
Sorry, at this time I really cannot follow all this traffic. I started the digression about "connect double" etc. in a post (30 Jan) that seemingly went unnoticed (maybe becuase I changed the subject line to something more significant). To be brief: 1.- I still think "connect" is more intuitive

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Angel Herraez
A gzipped file yes, but not a zipped file (I just tested it) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Tamas Horvath
If I would like to do something like that, where should I start looking in the source code?what I want to do is the following:I have a structure, which I run through a molecular dynamics simulation.I want to render the initial structure as a reference, and watch how the structure changes in course

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread nvervell
De: Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >A: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net >Sujet: Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB >Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:01:37 +0100 > >On Thursday 02 February 2006 16:56, Tamas Horvath wrote: >> or gzipped of course >> >> On 2/2/06, Tamas Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 02 February 2006 17:20, Tamas Horvath wrote: > so it is not possible to read and render multiple structures at the same > time? Yes, but that's something else... but at least Jmol does not support a zip file with more than one PDB file... see also below. > On 2/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.48

2006-02-02 Thread Bob Hanson
Bob, I think it would be a good idea for you to coordinate with others on the list to determine what the commands should be. I'd like to do that. Let's bat around a few possibilities. I know my own proposition is a moving target. The issue for me came up as I was rewriting the documentatio

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Tamas Horvath
so it is not possible to read and render multiple structures at the same time?On 2/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: De: Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>A: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net>Sujet: Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB >Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:01:37 +0100>>On Th

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> or gzipped of course gzip: yes ... gzip is designed for compressing individual files. Jmol can read any file in gzip format. zip: no ... zip is not designed for compressing individual files. Rather, it is designed for compressing directory structures. Jmol would not know which file to choose t

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Tamas Horvath
thanksOn 2/2/06, Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 02 February 2006 16:56, Tamas Horvath wrote:> or gzipped of course>> On 2/2/06, Tamas Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > Can Jmol read a zipped/jar-ed pdb file? Yes, just like an unziped/unjared PDF file. Jmol detects this

Re: [Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 02 February 2006 16:56, Tamas Horvath wrote: > or gzipped of course > > On 2/2/06, Tamas Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can Jmol read a zipped/jar-ed pdb file? Yes, just like an unziped/unjared PDF file. Jmol detects this on the fly. Egon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] PhD student on

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> I disagree. From a user perspective, "single" and "double" are just > rendering issues of wireframe. > I know, programmatically they are more akin to connect, Actually, I think that they are closer to wireframe. That is why I initially put them with wireframe. But, then again, I thought that '

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.48

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> on the other hand, it would be nice to be able to tell the wireframe > command whether or not to display the bond order. perhaps an > addition to the set command (e.g., set bondorder on|off)? This command already exists in RasMol/Chime and Jmol. set bonds off Will display all bonds as singl

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread Bob Hanson
Timothy Driscoll wrote: a) both connect and wireframe have a dependence upon the set bondmode setting. b) the sequence: select carbon connect 1.5 (hydrogen) adds C-H bonds, but then, right after it, connect double is unpredictable. One then needs to specify set bondmode OR first to do t

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.48

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> About connect/wireframe. Maybe I wasn't clear. > > wireframe SINGLE, DOUBLE, AROMATIC, etc. > > makes good sense. Feedback from others indicated that they thought that bond order should also be part of the 'connect' command. > Just like wireframe ON/OFF, we aren't defining bonds, > just > tweak

[Jmol-users] Re: compressed PDB

2006-02-02 Thread Tamas Horvath
or gzipped of courseOn 2/2/06, Tamas Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can Jmol read a zipped/jar-ed pdb file?

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.48

2006-02-02 Thread Bob Hanson
Tim, et al. Let's have more of a discussion about this. Maybe it is best to have SINGLE,DOUBLE, etc. in connect instead of wireframe. But the way this is being implemented is a problem. Here's a suggestion: Option 1 (current 00.48) connect: creates single bonds based on distance, regardless

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread Timothy Driscoll
On Feb 2, 2006, at 10:20 a, Bob Hanson wrote: I disagree. From a user perspective, "single" and "double" are just rendering issues of wireframe. bond color and diameter are display issues, but I think bond order implies something much more inherent, and it should not be considered a renderi

wireframe/connect usage (was Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread rgb
On Thu, February 2, 2006 10:20 am, Bob Hanson said: > I disagree. From a user perspective, "single" and "double" are just > rendering issues of wireframe. Wireframe should be allowed to respect or not respect the underlying connect type. If atoms are connected using a double bond then that *is* th

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread Bob Hanson
I disagree. From a user perspective, "single" and "double" are just rendering issues of wireframe. I know, programmatically they are more akin to connect, but here's the problem: If you propose connect DOUBLE instead of wireframe DOUBLE then, a) both connect and wireframe have a dependence

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.48

2006-02-02 Thread Timothy Driscoll
On Feb 2, 2006, at 9:58 a, Bob Hanson wrote: Thanks, Miguel, especially for the ZIP option. About connect/wireframe. Maybe I wasn't clear. wireframe SINGLE, DOUBLE, AROMATIC, etc. makes good sense. Just like wireframe ON/OFF, we aren't defining bonds, just tweaking how they are displayed (

Re: [Jmol-users] java error help

2006-02-02 Thread Sebastian Lisken
I think we need a welcome message for the mailing list reminding users that there is a difference between a public mailing list like this one and personal email. Which to me and many people on the net means that mailers should exercise discipline in keeping mail messages small. * Restict data

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.48

2006-02-02 Thread Bob Hanson
Thanks, Miguel, especially for the ZIP option. About connect/wireframe. Maybe I wasn't clear. wireframe SINGLE, DOUBLE, AROMATIC, etc. makes good sense. Just like wireframe ON/OFF, we aren't defining bonds, just tweaking how they are displayed (at least from a user perspective). I was only sug

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.48

2006-02-02 Thread Bob Hanson
Miguel wrote: Jmol prerelease 10.00.48 is now available for download from: www.jmol.org/files This version includes the following: - Support for Catalan localization (Thanks to Toni for the translation and Nico for integration) - change of some commands from WIREFRAME -> CONNECT (see below

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread Timothy Driscoll
On Feb 1, 2006, at 9:56 p, Miguel wrote: Bob wrote: To me it would seem more logical to have connect DELETE rather than wireframe DELETE Bob feels that the commnd for deleting bond should be connect delete; rather than wireframe delete; hi Miguel, I agree with this as well. t

Re: [Jmol-users] java error help

2006-02-02 Thread Frieda Reichsman
On Feb 2, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Miguel wrote:The problem is the last HELIX record.There needs to be a space character after the sequence number ... tospecify the insertion code.All of the other records have this.Thank you, thank you, thank you! This is a beautiful thing, it works with this change, of c

[Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.48

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
Jmol prerelease 10.00.48 is now available for download from: www.jmol.org/files This version includes the following: - Support for Catalan localization (Thanks to Toni for the translation and Nico for integration) - change of some commands from WIREFRAME -> CONNECT (see below) - binary d

Re: [Jmol-users] java error help

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> > On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >> Could you send the pdb files so that we can try to open it and see >> where the exception happens ? > > I am attaching the file at this point because I realize that my > method of looking at character length may be unreliable--I am

Re: [Jmol-users] invalid .pdb file

2006-02-02 Thread Frieda Reichsman
On Feb 2, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Miguel wrote:Q: The file is bad ... Can't you pull a valid file from the PDB?I am in my usual situation of converting someone else's Chime tutorial to Jmol. They have a script that uses atomnos that are specific to this pdb file, not the same as the original pdb file. So

Re: [Jmol-users] java error help

2006-02-02 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 02 February 2006 15:03, Frieda Reichsman wrote: > On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Miguel wrote: > > file format is invalid. > > > > PDB files must have records (lines) that are 80 characters long. > > > > You have a record that is short. > > It looks to me like every line in the file is sho

[Jmol-users] invalid .pdb file

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> > On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Miguel wrote: >> >> file format is invalid. >> >> PDB files must have records (lines) that are 80 characters long. >> >> You have a record that is short. > > It looks to me like every line in the file is short, and the header > has varying degrees of "shortness". So

Re: [Jmol-users] java error help

2006-02-02 Thread Frieda Reichsman
On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Miguel wrote:file format is invalid.PDB files must have records (lines) that are 80 characters long.You have a record that is short.It looks to me like every line in the file is short, and the header has varying degrees of "shortness". Some as short as 67, and the atom r

Re: [Jmol-users] java error help

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
> Hi, > > I am getting the following error message in the Java console, on Mac > OSX10.4, can someone tell me what it means? I suspect I am doing > something simple wrong, but cannot seem to find my error. > > error opening file:/Users/friedar/Sites/minm/scitech/boyer/animations/ > enzyme/cox2.pdb

Re: [Jmol-users] java error help

2006-02-02 Thread nvervell
De: Frieda Reichsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Hi, > >I am getting the following error message in the Java console, on Mac >OSX10.4, can someone tell me what it means? I suspect I am doing >something simple wrong, but cannot seem to find my error. > >error opening file:/Users/friedar/Sites/minm/

[Jmol-users] java error help

2006-02-02 Thread Frieda Reichsman
Hi,I am getting the following error message in the Java console, on Mac OSX10.4, can someone tell me what it means? I suspect I am doing something simple wrong, but cannot seem to find my error.error opening file:/Users/friedar/Sites/minm/scitech/boyer/animations/enzyme/cox2.pdbjava.lang.StringInde

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel
>> I think there are two concepts: >> - the connections/bond -> connect >> - the visualisation of the connections/bonds -> wireframe > > As I have posted before, I also think it makes more sense to have > display-rendering under WIREFRAME and bonding under CONNECT > and this will mean not only > "

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread Angel Herraez
> I think there are two concepts: > - the connections/bond -> connect > - the visualisation of the connections/bonds -> wireframe As I have posted before, I also think it makes more sense to have display-rendering under WIREFRAME and bonding under CONNECT and this will mean not only "connect del

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol prerelease 10.00.47

2006-02-02 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 02 February 2006 03:56, Miguel wrote: > Bob wrote: > > To me it would seem more logical to have > > > > connect DELETE > > > > rather than > > > > wireframe DELETE > > Bob feels that the commnd for deleting bond should be > > connect delete; > > rather than > > wireframe delete; > >

Re: [Jmol-users] How about EXTEIDE?

2006-02-02 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thursday 02 February 2006 00:32, EXTEIDE (sent by Nabble.com) wrote: > Did you hear about EXTEIDE? > > If you're working on Windows, visit once this site. http://www.exteide.com > > I think that will be referenced to your development. Is this some kind of SPAM? What's the deal with it? It does