Hi Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:mhno...@sbcglobal.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:38 PM
> To: leaf-devel
> Subject: [leaf-devel] Wikipedia
>
> Everyone,
> We have a Wikipedia page.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LEAF_Project
>
> --
> Mike Noy
Hi Erich.
> -Original Message-
> From: Erich Titl [mailto:erich.t...@think.ch]
> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 11:13 PM
> Cc: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Project Admin
>
> Hi KP
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Am Montag, 3. August 2009 14:21:54 schrieb Mi
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:mhno...@sbcglobal.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 5:43 PM
> To: leaf-devel
> Subject: [leaf-devel] Domain
>
> Everyone,
> Interesting. Someone grabbed our old domain.
>
> http://www.leaf-project.org/
>
> --
> Mike Noyes
Hi all,
> -Original Message-
> From: KP Kirchdoerfer [mailto:kap...@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:58 PM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?
>
> Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 18:56:09 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> >
Hi all,
the subject of working webconf has surfaced from time to time.
While we do have a good-enough solution with webconf in bering uclibc, this
would also be fun to look at.
http://luci.freifunk-halle.net/News
Apparently it is also used (or is planned) in OpenWRT.
To your appreciation.
Lu
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Mike Noyes
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:05 AM
> To: leaf-devel
> Subject: [leaf-devel] Domain still desired?
>
> Domain Name:LEAF-PROJECT.ORG
> Created On:21-Feb-2002 01:20:53 UTC
> La
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Mike Noyes
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 5:55 PM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Project description
>
> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 18:58 +0100, Martin Hejl wrote:
> >
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Joe Burke
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:35 PM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [leaf-devel] curl for Bering-uClibc
>
> Anyone create or know of a package with curl for
>
Hi Greg,
> -Original Message-
>
> I am real short of time too. However, I look forward to
> revising some of documentation files for the LEAF wiki. So
> with a little vim regex tricks, this page
> http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/leaf/doc/howto/LRP-
> Serial-HOWTO.txt?revis
Hi there Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: terça-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2006 22:02
> To: leaf-devel
> Subject: [leaf-devel] SCRUM
>
> Everyone,
> I just noticed the term SCRUM in a SF job opportunities post.
> It looks like it describes my
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > The exceptions are (IIRC) the kernel.
>
> That is a problem then, and we need to address it.
I still say it is a non-existing problem, rather a stubborness.
> > Do the guys at sourceforge.net really want to impl
Hi!
WARNING - personal opinion inside!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 4:39 PM
> To: leaf-devel
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you
> compliant??
>
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 07:41, Mike Noyes wr
Hi Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PDF generation was part of our old documentation build
> process. It did work, but wasn't what I'd call acceptable.
> The wiki install was in my to-do list much longer than you
> realize (around three years).
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 9:48 PM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Docs
>
> On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 02:24, Eric Spakman wrote:
> > I fully agree, but unfortuanatly I can't do anyth
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:13 PM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Flash Stick Image
>
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:25, Jorn Eriksen wrote:
> > Here's the URL
> > http://www.ccl-ne
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Natanael Copa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > As a conclusion, i'm looking forward to it.
>
> Meanwhile, someone else has offered me hosting and has
> already set up a mediawiki and started to add pages there...
>
> Even If I don't join LEAF yet,
Hi there!
> -Original Message-
> From: Natanael Copa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have been working on something that could turn into
> something that could satisfy this desire of playing with
> newer stuff. It has went under the codename "Alpine" and have
> been mentioned here in th
Hi
forgot an important issue...
The problem is normally related to CHS BIOS translation and I think
it all depends on the USB stick size.
Luis
> -Original Message-
> From: Luis.F.Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:00 AM
> To
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> IIRC, a USB keys can be formatted as a "floppy" type device
> (ie: one partition), or as a HDD (ie: 4 primary partitions).
>
> It should be possible to make an image that has an HDD
> partition table
Hi Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 4:21 PM
> To: leaf-devel
> Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Flash Drive
>
> Luis,
> I'm just one admin for this project. The other seven have the
> same permissions as I do. They can ev
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 3:06 PM
> To: Eric Spakman
> Cc: leaf-devel
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Flash Drive
>
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 01:43, Eric Spakman wrote:
> > >We can still strive to fit within 1.66M, a
Hi!
When replying to messages on this list, please use the
reply-to-all feature and remove all other email addresses. Thank you.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Lagush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > What wireless card are you trying to get working with linux?
> > There are a number
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Lagush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 5:23 PM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [leaf-devel] NDISwrapper
>
> Hi !
> Is anybody compiled NDISwrapper package for support WiFi card
> with Windows dirver model ?
Hi Nathan!
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Angelacos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
>
> In my heart, I believe the LEAF model is the safer route.
> Not perfect, but it
> adds an additional layer of "defense in depth".
>
> While I completely respect those that want to run a
Hi Natanael!
> -Original Message-
> From: Natanael Copa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Mike Noyes; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?
>
>
> [EMAIL PRO
Hi Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 11:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Can you tell us what your intentions are? By reading your
> comments it
> > seems like you are trying to force the creation of new branches.
>
> E
Hi Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 1:44 AM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?
>
>
To start:
I do apologise for what may have seem has a big bunch of
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:25 PM
> To: Natanael Copa
> Cc: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?
>
>
> Natanael Copa wrote:
> > Erich Titl wrote:
> >
> ..
> >
>
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:32 AM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Re: Guides
>
>
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:00, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > I still don't see that bucu-upnpd
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Koliwad, Ajay (GE Energy) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 12:45 PM
> To: 'leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: [leaf-devel] Extending LEAF
>
> Hello!
>
> In the course of product development in our organization, I
> am cu
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: David Douthitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 4:54 PM
> To: leaf-devel
> Subject: [leaf-devel] syslinux 3.x and APPEND lines
>
> In syslinux 3.x, the APPEND line has a maximum of 255 characters.
>
> Is this going to have a
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Angelacos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > - add 'pretty shorewall logs'
>
> You mean the table format (parsefw)? or is there more?
Yes, it is the parsefw thinghy...
>
> > - simplify log file viewing by not opening a separate window
> >
>
>
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Angelacos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 7:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into
> lrp and lwp parts
>
> Thanks for all the positive feedback on webconf so far.
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Victor McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 5:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [leaf-devel] 2.4.26 kernel for wd1100.o
>
> According to Erich Titl's instructions on LEAF.
>
> Quote:
>
> "The
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 3:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [leaf-devel] ifupdown problem in Bering-uClibc V2.2.0
>
> Hi, list,
>
> To reproduce this problem:
>
> firewall# ifup lo
> RTNETLINK an
Hi!
I've managed to create a driver for accessing the 3 LED's and
to read the button on a WRAP1C and compatible hardware.
This is a kernel driver based on Martin Hejl's GPIO driver for
Soekris. It was tested with a 2.4.26 kernel, the same as current
Bering uClibc 2.2 version uses. It may or may
Hi Mike,
> Everyone,
> What about this? It's not perfect, and I think a better solution
> (Subversion or rewrite of FRS) by the SF staff will address this
> eventually.
>
> Proposal:
> * Create 'devel' package in our FRS.
> * Create 'name' release within that package.
> *
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: K.-P. Kirchdörfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] PcEngines WRAP1C LED & Button driver
>
> Am Montag, 4. Oktober 2004 23:13 schrieb Lu
Hi Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 7:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] PcEngines WRAP1C LED & Button driver
>
> On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 09:55, Luis.F.Correia wrot
Hi!
I've managed to create a driver for accessing the 3 LED's and
to read the button on a WRAP1C and compatible hardware.
This is a kernel driver based on Martin Hejl's GPIO driver for
Soekris. It was tested with a 2.4.26 kernel, the same as current
Bering uClibc 2.2 version uses. It may or may
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Jørn Eriksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 10:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] LEAF on Linksys Routers
>
> Eric,
>
> If you get a WiFi card to work for the PcEngines platform
> please share your
> exper
> -Original Message-
> From: Lynn Avants [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [--ot] [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl)
>
> On Tuesday 06 July 2004 03:58 pm, Erich Titl wrote:
> [...]
> > Some time ago
[snip]
> Tom,
> Thanks for the feedback. :-)
>
> The readability of the nav bar may be related to the small caps, and
> fonts you have installed. Do you have the Bitstream Vera fonts
> installed?
>
> > I agree with KP that the Releases/Branches menu should return.
>
> I'll give this serious cons
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] [Fwd: Re: Mike Noyes]
>
> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 04:09, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > Mike Noyes has been in a bicycle acciden
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 10:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [leaf-devel] Bering on CD
>
> I'm getting new network service soon (hopefully more bandwidth!), and
> will be taking the oppor
You can find instructions here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=91005&page_id=41
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Oppalfens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:20 PM
> To: 'Jacques Nilo'; Kim Oppalfens; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [l
It is inside this archive...
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/arneb/buildtool2/buildtool2-0.2pre4.tgz
It is from our (unfinished) buildtool.
-Original Message-
From: Lynn Avants [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-dev
My excuses,
Actually what he did in LRP 2.9.8 was launch a 2.2 based kernel, not 2.4...
-Original Message-
From: Luis.F.Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: [leaf-devel] Linux Router Project Dead
Sorry Lynn, this
Sorry Lynn, this got to you but was intended for the list
-Original Message-
From: Luis.F.Correia
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:10 AM
To: 'Lynn Avants'
Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Linux Router Project Dead
Lynn and others:
what a shitload of crap.
I was also in the l
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/development/kernel/
-Original Message-
From: Greg Cockburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-devel] bering 1.2 kernel config file
Can some one please supply the config
Hi,
I read the doc, nicely documented.
Well done!
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:erich.titl@;think.ch]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-devel] write protected DOM/ADM
Hello everybody
Success, I got the SST/Ap
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Command recall Oxygen(yes) Bering(no) DF(no)
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:36:35AM +0100, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> Command recall that is used in all Leaf variants uses a patch made by
> someone
> from the LRP community to add 'command hist
Command recall that is used in all Leaf variants uses a patch made by
someone
from the LRP community to add 'command history' to the original ASH.
It may be possible that this patch is not functional for long lines.
Please note that ash has had no changes since 1999...
-Original Message
When you compile a C or C++ program, by default the compiler adds
symbols and debugging information. This is good during development
because you can debug a program going step by step, seeing the original
lines of C code.
After everyhing is OK, you either compile the program without debug
info, o
>> why GNU sed?
>
>Because BusyBox sed is pretty broken when running complex scripts, sed
>is pretty small, and sed features are used almost as much as
>shell-script in LEAF/LRP systems, and once again, busybox sed wasn't
>around (at least in a usable form) when most of the current
>distributions
fcorreia/Bering-uClibc-0.3.ima
-Original Message-
From: Luis.F.Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-devel] Bering compiled with uClibc
Ok guys, here's a crazy thought:
For a while it puzzled me why didn
Ok guys, here's a crazy thought:
For a while it puzzled me why didn't LEAF evolve to a more recent and stable
libc.
Then I looked a bit into it and realised the obvious, to better support
virtually everything, libc has bloated. Its fat, huge and ugly.
So some time in the past two weeks, I sta
Did you create and populate the corresponding zebra.list, zebra.help, etc?
-Original Message-
From: Eric B Kiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-devel] Quick and Dirty LRP Package How-To
Hey everybody,
I have go
>I also agree perl would be an overkill. What we need is to create a
>framework like we have for lrps for web based management. Every lrp must
>have a web based config template that will be used by a master web script.
>The template format and scripting needs to be developed and standardised.
Wh
if you included your package name as the last one, did you produce
an extra line at the end?
Debian based systems like and extra line at the end.
Or I might also be wrong :)
-Original Message-
From: Jon Clausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:57 AM
To: [EMAI
Hi there!
I have been helping the LEAF community for some time now.
To my (slight) surprise, Mike invited me to join LEAF as a developer.
I am much honored.
My knowledge in Linux is relatively small.
My main work, training and experience is with Windoze.
It may suck but that's what pays :)
Just a small suggestion, since we had a lot of issues in the past concering
mail from the router:
Why can't we forget about the POSIXness scripts for mail and create a (very)
small package just for this function?
Then we could use other methods for sending mail like something based on
the 'smtpc
>> And as a last point:
>> The current CD building process with isolinux is technically the most
>> advanced solution, anyway I can't boot with it. HP Anvin tells us in a
>> few places, that a lot of older bios are buggy and will only boot
>> with the ugly syslinux/bootdisk.img solution. In op
Have you loaded the correct modules loaded?
Have you read the documentation?
-Original Message-
From: Richard Herrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:00 PM
To: Chad Carr; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] RE: Booting Bering from /dev/hda2
I'm tryin
I guess it is correct, although I will have to check it out :)
-Original Message-
From: K.-P. Kirchdörfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:50 PM
To: LEAF-dev
Subject: [Leaf-devel] bering CD syslinux-style?
A question to the Bering crew about required files on bo
Hey!
That's neat!
I'll give it a go later on :)
-Original Message-
From: Serge Caron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:39 PM
To: LEAF
Subject: [Leaf-devel] Small SMTP send-only MTA
Hello all,
Here is a small (5277 bytes, 5.5kb on floppy) send only MTA
http://
Well, I guess I never did properly introduce myself...
I'm currently working as a developper for a Portuguese Institute, preparing
a
Windows NT 4 Unattended Installation that provides for a fully working
workstation for front and backoffice users.
I have been in contact on and off with Linux for
Correcting subject line. Done :)
I honestly cannot express myself in very fluently in English.
Therefore, you will have to bear with me for a while. Try to
rearrange my sentences so that they make some sense.
Comments below start with
[snip]
>Adding water to a boiling and already full
Adding water to a boiling and already full kettle...
Why can't we use a concept similar to this:
vfat is used
Package name: pppd-2.1.4
Package files: pppd-2.1.4-bin.lrp, pppd-2.1.4-conf.lrp
pppd-bin.lrp contains all necessary binaries and 'non-editable' scripts,
pppd-conf.lrp contains all co
Can you explain me in laymen terms what DCMA stands for?
I know it means Digital Copyright Millenium Act but what is this exactly?
I also know that, to the Portuguese law, software patents do not exist.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, Febru
>>
>>Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and loads
>>glibc 2.0.7 for floppy releases and glibc whatever for CD, HD et
>>al...
>>
>I think supporting 3 different c-libraries at a time will cause lots of
>problems for users, and for the developers supporting them. I'd prefe
I will test it also!
Maybe I will now move away from EigerStein2B... :)
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Hadley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 7:37 PM
To: Larry Platzek
Cc: LEAF-dev
Subject: [Leaf-devel] Re: your PPPd analog modem image
- Original Messag
I can support that!
In fact I was rather surprised that this question took all
this time to come up.
If we did branch away from LRP, we definitely should be
named differently. In every possible way.
But that is just my humble opinion.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Schalit [mailto:[EM
>Good point. It may be possible as cdrtools (mkisofs) compiles fine under
>cygwin. I haven't tried though. But I agree it will be harder for many
>end-users.
Ewald,
mkisofs / cdrecord work fine in a pure Windows config. I use them to produce
almost all CD's here at work.
I can make them boo
Nathan,
When booting from a CD, the only floppy formats supported are 1.44 and 2.88.
Check which format Oxygen-CD is using and correct your config file.
-Original Message-
From: Angelacos, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:33 PM
To: LEAF Development
>Luis F. Correia wrote:
>> Dunno, I got them from the RedHat CD.
>>
>> One thing to take in account is the name may be different, but the
>> words 'compat' and '5.2' must be present.
>>
>> On RedHat 7.1 and 7.2 there are other 'compat' libraries in which the
>> names change to '6.2'
>That's
>On 11/29/01 at 9:38 AM, Luis.F.Correia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> After a sucessfull install, I booted and installed the extra
>> 'compat' rpms. As a note, one should use the RPM's stated in
>> http://www.redhat.com/knowledgebase/glibccompat/bui
Ok, let's start:
I grabbed a RedHat 7.0 CD and installed a custom system with
only the 'Kernel devel, Devel and Utilities' selected.
After a sucessfull install, I booted and installed the extra
'compat' rpms. As a note, one should use the RPM's stated in
http://www.redhat.com/knowledgebase/gli
Well I'm using IE 5.01 and te applet shows up but it says 'no data' on both
IF panes..
Strange?
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] lrpStat
> Try this ( jus
ernet. Groovy. I wonder how lean it
can be built?
-Scott
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
>
> >
> > Let me explain it better:
> >
> > A router/firewall LEAF box running a framebuffer-enabled kernel,
> > has
?
-Original Message-
From: David Douthitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:55 PM
To: LEAF Devel
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Framebuffer & vnc
"Luis.F.Correia" wrote:
> I read some time ago, that someone was triyng to make a
> Framebuffer &
Hi!
I read some time ago, that someone was triyng to make a
Framebuffer & vnc combination for remote administration.
Is there something that I can test?
The kernel, distro does not mind, I just want to see the results
Thanks!
Luis Correia
___
Leaf-
: Luis.F.Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:38 PM
To: LEAF-DEVEL (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan?
Thanks Scott!
THAT was indeed the page I was looking for.
And in the logs there are a big number of 3 in-a-row logs...
I guess that there are
To: Luis.F.Correia
Cc: LEAF-DEVEL (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan?
Luis:
Heya. I think the page you're asking about is this one:
www.echogent.com/cgi-bin/fwlog.pl
I sent Mike the code to get that running on the LEAF site,
I suspect he'
It's a request to my router/firewall which has nothing on it :)
-Original Message-
From: Pim van Riezen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:49 PM
To: Luis.F.Correia
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan?
"Luis.F.Correia" <[EMAIL
Last night, while browsing around I started to get entries
like this on my logs.
I'm using an ES2B modified version (PPP)
Is this a CodeRed scan?
Sorry that it is not properly formatted.
Also I lost the link to that page on where we could put lines
like this to get extra info. Could someone
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/21253.html
Luis Correia
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
http://www.simovits.com/nyheter9902.html
Luis Correia
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Jeff, all of your comments check out with mine, except this one:
>In our case, the final product would probably be a generic 486, but I
>don't see support for that.
486 platforms are NOT supported.
We have to evolve a little :(
"This reads on manual page 46: This LSP was built for 586 processo
No. Don't bother Mike.
Really, as I continue to read the pdf, I reckon that we
should go in the cross-compiling direction.
Why boot and install a target if you haven't decide what
packages will ou put there?
I will investigate further on.
I have had little experience with a full-distro but Red
Mike,
If you read the manual, HHL-JE-20.PDF, Chapter3 on page 19,
"Installing HHL 2.0 on an IA-32/x86 Target for a Source-
base Installation"
Right on the Overview chapter you can read:
"The HHL 2.0 CDs for IA-32/x86 targets are bootable, and may be booted
directly on a target whose BIOS provid
>> > I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong
with
>> > CD1...
>> >
>> > It should boot, but I get nothing.
>>
>> Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
>I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and the former will boot (target mode) while
>the latter will not
I'm sorry... (again) I should have RTFM'd
The Journeyman is a development system as Jeff says.
But, I should boot under a x86 system, maybe as hdc s Charles suggested.
Anyway, after trying on several machines here @ work yesterday, I came to
the conclusion that it should be installed on a R
One extra thought!
MD5 checksums ARE OK!!!
Bye!
p.s. Charles, if you managed to boot it, can you privately send me the boot
floppy?
-Original Message-
From: Luis.F.Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 5:55 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
Hi,
I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong with
CD1...
It should boot, but I get nothing.
Opening the same CD and extracting the bootflop.img which is under the
bootimg directory, and put it on a floppy, still does not boot.
Any pointers?
Thanks
-Original M
Well, don't kill me but, you do have one tool...
It's for the Windoze world and it is called DaemonTools.
It can mount an ISO image and can even emulate a cdrom drive letter.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:45 PM
To: [
t find
any good reason for the problem. Will keep looking.
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> Yeah!
>
> I got this:
>
>
> This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
> Servi
>Take a look at Cisco I'd say. I never have to compile IOS from source, but
>they're pretty responsible in reporting security issues.
Provided you'll pay for the fixes.
They do NOT offer nothing for free... but they never said that either...
___
Lea
Yeah!
I got this:
This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message.
If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then
open it using a viewer that can display the original
I subscribed to this list moments ago, and this is the second message I
received.
If you plan to send this out, I will sign it.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT Re: [Leaf-deve
100 matches
Mail list logo
