Linux From Scratch - Version 7.3 Chapter 8. Making the LFS System Bootable 8.2.
Creating the /etc/fstab File
---
sda1 Boot Primary vfat
Go to the Gentoo or Arch Linux web sight they have info on how to create
the /etc/fstab file. You won't learn much by having someone do it for you.
On Jun 11, 2013 9:46 PM, John Black j...@inbox.com wrote:
Linux From Scratch - Version 7.3 Chapter 8. Making the LFS System Bootable
8.2. Creating
On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:45 PM, John Black wrote:
Kernel panic, probably it's from fstab file.
Kernel panics don't know about /etc/fstab.
Kernel panics mean that you don't have the proper drivers in the
running kernel.
If it is a vfs issue about mounting root fs and unknown block-device
-Original Message-From: kb0...@berzerkula.orgSent: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:13:58 -0500To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.orgSubject: Re: [lfs-support] Creating the /etc/fstab FileOn Jun 11, 2013, at 9:45 PM, John Black wrote:Kernel panic, probably it's from fstab file.Kernel panics don't
-Original Message-From: kb0...@berzerkula.orgSent: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:13:58 -0500To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.orgSubject: Re: [lfs-support] Creating the /etc/fstab FileOn Jun 11, 2013, at 9:45 PM, John Black wrote:Kernel panic, probably it's from fstab file.Kernel panics don't
I found this error in the book
It is possible to make the ext3 filesystem reliable across power
failures for some hard disk types. To do this, add the barrier=1 mount
option to the appropriate entry in /etc/fstab. To check if the disk
drive supports this option, run hdparm
Baho Utot wrote:
I found this error in the book
It is possible to make the ext3 filesystem reliable across power
failures for some hard disk types. To do this, add the barrier=1 mount
option to the appropriate entry in /etc/fstab. To check if the disk
drive supports this option, run
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
I'd appreciate it if somebody could please have a look at my /etc/fstab
file shown below and let me know if it's OK. I've searched this mailing
list's archives and an example /etc/fstab I found was a bit different to
mine. I also had a look at the /etc/fstab files
. My partition allocation is almost the same as yours. Unlike
others, I do like to put some things on /opt (Xorg, KDE, Qt, JDK,
others). -- Bruce
Got it. Thanks. I've modified my /etc/fstab file as suggested by Ken.
Compiling the kernel now.
Alexander.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
will try to use whatever root= you passed on
the commandline from grub : here UUID will NOT work (we don't use an
initrd) - and what is shown in /etc/fstab for '/' is at best
documentation.
While reading the man page for fstab(5), I got the impression that using
UUIDs was the preferred method
I'd appreciate it if somebody could please have a look at my /etc/fstab
file shown below and let me know if it's OK. I've searched this mailing
list's archives and an example /etc/fstab I found was a bit different to
mine. I also had a look at the /etc/fstab files on a Ubuntu and Debian
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 09:27:03PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
I'd appreciate it if somebody could please have a look at my /etc/fstab
file shown below and let me know if it's OK. I've searched this mailing
list's archives and an example /etc/fstab I found was a bit different to
mine. I
--- Original Message ---
From: rhubarbpie...@gmail.com[mailto:rhubarbpie...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10/10/2010 11:12:48 AM
To : rhubarb...@poetworld.net
Cc :
Subject : FW: Re: FW: Re: auto in /etc/fstab
On 10/10/2010 01:05 PM, rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote
On Monday 11 October 2010 07:56:17 rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
--- Original Message ---
From: rhubarbpie...@gmail.com[mailto:rhubarbpie...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10/10/2010 11:12:48 AM
To : rhubarb...@poetworld.net
Cc :
Subject : FW: Re: FW: Re: auto in /etc/fstab
On 10/11/2010 08:39 AM, Neal Murphy wrote:
Binutils are getting better at recognizing a filesystem and loading its
module(s) as needed before mounting it; it wasn't always thus. Regardless of
that, there are two consumers of /etc/fstab: the computer, and the admin; it
needs to be computer
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:18:30 -0500
rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list
them all as auto?
About the only reason you wouldn't have something set to be auto
Jonathan Arnold wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:18:30 -0500
rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list
them all as auto?
About the only reason you wouldn't have
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 16:18 -0500, rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
all as auto?
I may be wrong, but I *think* auto works only for filesystems
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
all as auto?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM, rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
all as auto?
I don't really know the answer to your question but if it's of
interest
On 09/30/2010 07:52 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:18 PM,rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote:
Is there a disadvantage of using auto for file system type in the
/etc/fstab file? I have three non-swap partitions. Why not list them
all as auto?
That's a good question
on it and boot. So I am at the
point to create /etc/fstab and its looking for the root partition and swap
devices. Here are my present two lines for the root and swap on Centos:
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3defaults 1 1
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swap swap
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:34:48 +0100
Clemens Haupt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Clemens,
I realise that you are helping another German speaker. However this
list is English. If you give him bad advice we can't correct it if we
didn't understand it. Please stick to English on the lists and
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 1/26/06, Matt Darcy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I boot into my LFS host distro (Slack 10.2).
Warning - Slackware 10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
first build you may want to consider a better host distro
He's using Slack 10.2. Why is that a problem?
more comfortable, I want to put /dev/hda6 in /etc/fstab, so it is
automatically mounted every time I boot into my LFS host distro (Slack 10.2). I
have this, so far:
/dev/hda6/mnt/lfsext2 defaults* *
Question: what shall I put in place of the asterisks? Some entries do have
I boot into my LFS host distro (Slack 10.2).
Warning - Slackware 10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
first build you may want to consider a better host distro
/dev/hda6/mnt/lfsext2 defaults* *
Question: what shall I put in place of the asterisks?
Le Jeudi 26 Janvier 2006 11:41, Matt Darcy a écrit :
Warning - Slackware 10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
first build you may want to consider a better host distro
Humm. I spent the best part of the morning installing a comfortable build
host. Anybody on the list tried to build
On 1/26/06, Matt Darcy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I boot into my LFS host distro (Slack 10.2).
Warning - Slackware 10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
first build you may want to consider a better host distro
He's using Slack 10.2. Why is that a problem? I've never heard this
Quoting Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Warning - Slackware 10 has problems acting as a build host. For your
first build you may want to consider a better host distro
He's using Slack 10.2. Why is that a problem? I've never heard this before.
Well, although I really like Slack 10.2
On 1/26/06, Luca Dionisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, although I really like Slack 10.2 as an everyday distro, I'm not
particularly anal about using it as a host system. After reading various
IMHO, you can have a try using your Slack as a host
partition and work on it for
a bit.)
Das find ich nicht so gut, ich hab's ausprobiert, weil sich die meisten
Befehle im Buch auf $LFS beziehen und das soll /mnt/lfs sein.
Irgendwo hakelt es früher oder später.
To get more comfortable, I want to put /dev/hda6 in /etc/fstab, so
On Thursday 26 January 2006 12:27, you wrote:
Le Jeudi 26 Janvier 2006 11:41, Matt Darcy a écrit :
Warning - Slackware 10 has problems acting as a build host. For
your first build you may want to consider a better host distro
Humm. I spent the best part of the morning installing a comfortable
Hello,
I hope this question doesn't turn out to be a stupid as my last one but
here goes anyway. I hav got to page 103 of the LFS book(6.1) and am
mounting the virtual kernel files on the new filesystem with
mount -t devpts -o gid=4,mode=620 none /dev/pts
I get a warning
can't open /etc/fstab
open /etc/fstab: No such file or directory
now I don't remember making fstab in a previous section, and wasn't
expecting this warning. Is it an expected warning or have I done
something wrong?
-Ross-
This is mentioned in the book, right below the mount commands.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
34 matches
Mail list logo
