Re: [lfs-support] bootup sequence

On 4/19/21 2:31 PM, Brian Hagen wrote: Hello, all:     I am satisfied with the stability of the 9.1. 10.0, and 10.1 LFS releases that I have built. Even so, I would like to take some time to get very familiar with the bootup sequences they have. Ideally, it could be possible to trace the

Re: [lfs-support] init-functions: new pidofproc function: posix compliant: no sub shells: tested

On 4/9/21 12:50 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote: Hi Scott On 4/9/21 12:16 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: On 4/9/21 2:10 AM, Tim Tassonis wrote: Hi Scott On 4/9/21 2:40 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: # Function:    pidofproc [-p pidfile] pathname #   The pidofproc function shall return one or more process #  

Re: [lfs-support] ERROR: init-functions: start_daemon

On 4/2/21 6:29 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: On 4/1/21 11:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 4/1/21 7:15 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: in init-functions start_daemon pidfile is not validated before removing... code as follows [snip] # Execute if [ -z "${

Re: [lfs-support] ERROR: init-functions: start_daemon

On 4/1/21 7:15 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: in init-functions start_daemon pidfile is not validated before removing... code as follows [snip]     # Execute     if [ -z "${force}" ]; then     if [ -z "${pidfile}" ]; then     # Determine the pid by discovery    

Re: [lfs-support] ERROR: init-functions: killproc

I think you are right, but it's low priority right now. We are really busy trying to get a new server set up properly. For now there is http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/4842 -- Bruce On 4/1/21 9:35 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: This code is from killproc: If killproc is called (

Re: [lfs-support] ERROR: lib/lsb/init-functions: check_sig_type()

On 3/30/21 7:51 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: On 3/30/21 12:34 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 3/29/21 7:30 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: The existing function does not return a correct result for all signal types. # check_sig_type() # Original less empty lines check_sig_type() { local

Re: [lfs-support] ERROR: lib/lsb/init-functions: check_sig_type()

On 3/29/21 7:30 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: The existing function does not return a correct result for all signal types. # check_sig_type() # Original less empty lines check_sig_type() {     local valsig     # The list of termination signals (limited to generally used items)    

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

Copying to the list. On 3/22/21 4:53 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 3/22/21 3:57 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: On 3/22/21 1:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 3/22/21 11:54 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: Actually it doesn't.. Test-rc.sh: Begin Run: print_error_msg

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

On 3/22/21 10:44 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: Syntax errors found in /etc/init.d/rc... Not errors, but someone's preferences. For instance all the 'Prefer explicit escaping: "\\n"' issues are wrong. The page https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/wiki/SC1001 says: Rationale: You have escaped

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

On 3/20/21 10:44 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Anyway, I hope you are now convinced that the right command for testing script status is: if ! check_script_status; then continue; fi I agree with the syntax, but have a problem with the name. What are we checking the script status for? complete?

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

On 3/18/21 1:32 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: Although the init-functions and rc scripts currently run properly, what you propose below is a bit cleaner. I'll note that the scripts were initially written to be posix compatible (no bashisms) and changing that is a different discussion. That's not

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

On 3/18/21 11:21 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: I am presently looking at and working on the LFS boot scripts. They are in my opinion very rough state. I am going to clean them up and use the following format for all of the individual scripts that will be used on my systems as follows: Shebang

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 10.1 bombing at Linux kernel stage

On 3/11/21 10:18 PM, Brian Hagen wrote: Hello, all     I have been through the LFS 10.1 build twice with the same results. It goes all the way through without apparent flaw until the kernel build at 10.3.1. Then it bombs out with the following: -

Re: [lfs-support] The Korean translation of the project has been completed.

On 3/8/21 11:34 AM, Jongmin Kim wrote: It is based on the stable version 9.1 and available with html, html-nochunk and pdf version. I posted it on my github: https://github.com/NuttyJamie/LinuxFromScratch-for-Korean. I'm planning to update to the 10.1 stable version soon. So I would appreciate

[lfs-support] LFS and BLFS Version 10.1 are released

locally. Please direct any comments about this release to the LFS development team at lfs-...@linuxfromscratch.org or blfs-...@linuxfromscratch.org. Registration for the mailing lists is required to avoid junk email. -- Bruce Dubbs LFS [0] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/10.1/ [1

[lfs-support] LFS-10.1-rc1 is released

The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version 10.1-rc1. It is a preliminary release of LFS-10.1. The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version 10.1-rc1. It is a preliminary release of LFS-10.1. Major changes include toolchain updates to

Re: [lfs-support] how to find out grub boot path

On 2/19/21 9:02 AM, Thomas Seeling wrote: Hallo, is it possible to query the "breadcrumb" of a grub boot process? Is there a query function that I can use to find out how my system got bootstrapped? Use a single boot partition and install grub to use that. I can understand the rationale

Re: [lfs-support] how to find out grub boot path

On 2/17/21 3:56 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 22:04:06 +0100 Thomas Seeling wrote: Hallo, is it possible to query the "breadcrumb" of a grub boot process? Say I have multiple partitions, e.g. /dev/sda1, /dev/sda5, /dev/sda6, with different LFS versions. When booting grub

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On 2/11/21 8:38 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:17:27AM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 12:28 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: On 2021-02-10 21:57 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: [snip] And, this issue seems "fixed" in 5.11-rc7 so I think the kernel dev may have

Re: [lfs-support] Compiling M4 on GCC 10.2

On 2/10/21 7:16 AM, Viktor Engelmann wrote: Am 09.02.2021 um 16:46 schrieb Xi Ruoyao: On 2021-02-09 16:11 +0100, Viktor Engelmann wrote: Hello everyone, I'm building LFS 10.0 on a fully updated Manjaro Linux on an x86_64 for x86_64. When I compile M4 (chapter 6.2), I get two errors:  - gcc

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On 2/7/21 9:52 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:14:22AM +0800, xry...@mengyan1223.wang wrote: Please help me to test my glibc workaround in this thread. If it works, crt1.o should have no "needed" ISA markers (even x86-64-baseline should not be there). Then we can

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with grub and patch to dev.

On 2/7/21 8:11 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 14:15 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 13:38 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: LS, Finally had a change to finish the LFS build. Alas, the grub- install reported the old error "Decompression is too big". Here is the

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with grub and patch to dev.

On 2/7/21 7:15 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 13:38 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: LS, Finally had a change to finish the LFS build. Alas, the grub-install reported the old error "Decompression is too big". Here is the solution to add to the section to compile grub: # Patch

Re: [lfs-support] Compile file 5.39 (dev)

On 2/4/21 2:50 PM, Frans de Boer wrote: On 04/02/2021 21:21, Pierre Labastie wrote: On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:03 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: On 04/02/2021 16:22, Scott Andrews wrote: On 2/4/21 9:14 AM, Frans de Boer wrote: The new instructions for compiling file-5.39 in the first phase, are

Re: [lfs-support] lfs-bootscripts-20210113 mountfs

On 1/31/21 12:44 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: I have been going through the boot scripts and cleaning them up and I came across this jewel... BTW it would be helpful to use some kind of standard in all the boot scripts, blfs included mountfs ${failed} is undefined/not defined case "${1}" in   

Re: [lfs-support] Odp: lfs-support Digest, Vol 1406, Issue 1

On 1/28/21 2:18 PM, Jakub Drozd wrote: Hi, I see that you are still confused with my replies. I don't know why it is formatted in some instead of ", because it is not my problem, when I see in my sent messages in my inbox, I see normal plain text. So, to avoid confusion, I will send my

Re: [lfs-support] linux 5.5.9: shutdown -h hangs on detaching cdrom

On 1/27/21 11:32 AM, Stephen Berman wrote: On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:29:13 +0200 Stephen Berman wrote: I've built current development LFS using jhalfs and when I invoke (via sudo or logged in as root) `shutdown -h now', the system appears to hang [...] On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 00:33:42 +0200

Re: [lfs-support] stopping point in LFS 10.0 at section 8.23

On 1/23/21 10:56 PM, Brian Hagen wrote:     In an LFS 10.0 build, I was at section 8.23, which compiles the Acl-2.2.53 package. During the first step, (./configure), it reached the point listed as "checking for getxattr in -lattr... no". Then it halted with the message "FATAL ERROR: could not

Re: [lfs-support] xg++: error: unrecognized command-line option '-funconfigured-libstdc++-v3' when compiling GCC 1st pass

On 1/13/21 7:46 AM, coolnodje wrote: Is http://linuxfromscratch.org quite slow or is it just me? I have a lot of timeouts getting pages, started at when I encountered the bug, roughly. It is slow. Try one of the mirrors. We are working on a major upgrade to the server. -- Bruce --

Re: [lfs-support] xg++: error: unrecognized command-line option '-funconfigured-libstdc++-v3' when compiling GCC 1st pass

On 1/13/21 7:23 AM, coolnodje wrote: Interesting.  Can you do 'su -' to become root? I haven't set a root pwd, but `sudo su -` works fine What are the ownership and permissions of /home/lfs/, /home/lfs/.bash_profile, and /home/lfs/.bashrc ? All standard, I believe, respectively: 755

Re: [lfs-support] xg++: error: unrecognized command-line option '-funconfigured-libstdc++-v3' when compiling GCC 1st pass

On 1/12/21 1:37 PM, coolnodje wrote: GCC compilation went well after fixing PATH from .bashrc But oddly the problem when using `su - lfs` comes from .bash_profile, containing |exec env -i HOME=$HOME TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' /bin/bash| as defined in the book. Using `su lfs` then cd home

Re: [lfs-support] xg++: error: unrecognized command-line option '-funconfigured-libstdc++-v3' when compiling GCC 1st pass

On 1/8/21 11:25 AM, Don Cross wrote: On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 11:32 AM Bruce Dubbs <mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 1/8/21 7:36 AM, coolnodje wrote: >  > Please do not top post to the mailing list. > I'm not quite sure I understand what you mean. As a

Re: [lfs-support] xg++: error: unrecognized command-line option '-funconfigured-libstdc++-v3' when compiling GCC 1st pass

On 1/8/21 7:36 AM, coolnodje wrote: > Please do not top post to the mailing list. I'm not quite sure I understand what you mean. Well, you could read the footer: Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a

Re: [lfs-support] xg++: error: unrecognized command-line option '-funconfigured-libstdc++-v3' when compiling GCC 1st pass

On 1/8/21 4:32 AM, coolnodje wrote: Thanks for your answer. I may be wrong but I think the error indicates that it /doesn't recognize/ the flag `--disable-libstdcxx` Anyway I copy pasted the configure flags from the manual, and i double checked, it was included in the configure directive.

Re: [lfs-support] first boot on 9.1

On 12/31/20 7:53 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 05:55:57PM -0600, Brian Hagen wrote: Hello,     Re the comments from Ken and Bruce, first, thank you for them. I will quote here from LFS 9.1, section 2.4.1.4 comments on partitioning: === /boot – Highly

Re: [lfs-support] first boot on LFS 9.1

On 12/30/20 12:50 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 10:04:19PM -0600, Brian Hagen wrote: Hello:     After numerous passes to reach the finish line on LFS 9.1, I got a working system installed. The prompt reads "-bash-5.0#". However, the grub installer did not go well. It presents

Re: [lfs-support] adding / configuring a VLAN

On 12/17/20 11:32 AM, iw3...@arcor.de wrote: On December 17, 2020 at 6:03 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 12/17/20 10:24 AM, iw3...@arcor.de wrote: Hi all, recently I read some docs about adding and configuring VLANs under linux. It seems actually pretty simple, with something like: # ip link

Re: [lfs-support] adding / configuring a VLAN

On 12/17/20 10:24 AM, iw3...@arcor.de wrote: Hi all, recently I read some docs about adding and configuring VLANs under linux. It seems actually pretty simple, with something like: # ip link add link eth0 name eth0.100 type vlan id 100 you get a eth0.100 virtual network device and then you

Re: [lfs-support] Rebooting section 11.3

On 12/14/20 12:54 PM, James Read wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:34 PM Bruce Dubbs <mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 12/14/20 12:14 PM, James Read wrote: > Hi, > > I am having difficulty with booting my LFS system. I modified my > existin

Re: [lfs-support] Rebooting section 11.3

On 12/14/20 12:14 PM, James Read wrote: Hi, I am having difficulty with booting my LFS system. I modified my existing grub.cfg to include the following: menuentry "GNU/Linux, Linux 5.8.3-lfs-10.0" {         linux   /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.3-lfs-10.0 root=/dev/sda1 ro } The menu entry is included

Re: [lfs-support] Section 3.1 Problems dowloading packages to sources directory

On 12/13/20 6:41 AM, James Read wrote: I am working on Ubuntu and am having problems with the following command: wget --input-file=wget-list --continue --directory-prefix=$LFS/sources It generates lots of errors of the type: --2020-12-13 12:27:57--

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 9.1 sticking point at section 8.3 -- first steps in kernel build

On 11/15/20 10:42 PM, Brian Hagen wrote: Hello: I have progressed all the way to the kernel-build stage (8.3) in LFS 9.1. All went well to this point. The document states that the first step is to run "make defconfig". It fails with the following message: ---

Re: [lfs-support] Make -k test failed - on 8.18. Binutils-2.35

On 10/23/20 12:51 PM, Hideo wrote: El vie., 23 oct. 2020 a las 18:58, Bruce Dubbs () escribió: On 10/23/20 11:28 AM, Hideo wrote: Dear Team, I have this error when run a make -k check: PASS: test-strtol-0. PASS: test-strtol-1. PASS: test-strtol-2. PASS: test-strtol-3. PASS: test-strtol-4

Re: [lfs-support] Make -k test failed - on 8.18. Binutils-2.35

On 10/23/20 11:28 AM, Hideo wrote: Dear Team, I have this error when run a make -k check: PASS: test-strtol-0. PASS: test-strtol-1. PASS: test-strtol-2. PASS: test-strtol-3. PASS: test-strtol-4. PASS: test-strtol-5. PASS: test-strtol-6. PASS: test-strtol-7. PASS: test-strtol-8. PASS:

[lfs-support] LFS and BLFS Version 10.0 are released

online[0]-[3], or download[4]-[7] to read locally. Please direct any comments about this release to the LFS development team at lfs-...@linuxfromscratch.org or blfs-...@linuxfromscratch.org. Registration for the mailing lists is required to avoid junk email. -- Bruce Dubbs LFS [0] http

[lfs-support] LFS-10.0-rc1 is released

The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version 10.0-rc1. It is a preliminary release of LFS-10.0. This version of the book has undergone a major reorganization. It uses enhanced cross-compilation techniques and an environment isolated from the host system to build tools

Re: [lfs-support] LFS V. 9.1 - Tcl-8.6.10 (Section 5.11) dependencies

On 7/17/20 12:31 AM, Theodore Planinsek wrote: Hello all, I'm writing only after checking the FAQS and IRC sections on linuxfromscratch.org . To that end,  I've ran into (and fixed?) an apparent missed dependency of Tcl-8.6.10. The issue was tclsh was

Re: [lfs-support] IPv4 en 6

On 7/6/20 8:57 AM, Frans de Boer wrote: I have found messages from some years ago asking about the possibility of giving examples how to configure LFS for use on IPv4 and IPv6. Now, LFS is still using the ifconfig utility including the ipconfig.xxx file. I found references to this utility way

Re: [lfs-support] iostream.h missing (dev v10) (SOLVED)

On 6/23/20 3:01 PM, Frans de Boer wrote: On 2020-06-22 20:02, Frans de Boer wrote: On 2020-06-22 14:54, Xi Ruoyao wrote: echo "#include | x86_64-cross-linux-gnu-g++ -E -x c++ - Result: # 1 "" # 1 "" # 1 "" # 1 "/mnt/lfs/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4 # 1 "" 2 # 1 "" :1:10: fatal error:

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 9.1 GMP-6.2.0 test suite

On 6/22/20 6:29 PM, Alexey Orishko wrote: Hi all, While building LFS 9.1 I got a problem with the description of GMP-6.2.0 test suite results in ch.6.19. In both LFS books it is said that there are 190 tests, but I got 197 "PASS"es. It does not prevent me from going forwards, but it might be

Re: [lfs-support] Users cannot su in svn-20200616

On 6/17/20 9:19 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: I've now completed, and booted, a build of the new-style LFS. I'm loggied in (and using ssh to write this post). Both my normal users (ken, lfs), as well as root can login - so the passwords are correct. But only root can su, so I'm not going to be able

Re: [lfs-support] Util-linux-2.35.2

On 6/8/20 5:11 PM, Flareon Zulu wrote: In building util-linux in ch 5 of the dev book, it wanted me to supply --build, --target, and --host. I used $LFS_TGT to make it happy on all three, but has anyone else had this come up? That should not be needed. You must be doing something different

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On 6/7/20 10:35 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: Finally replying to this: I did use that system for a fresh build, but the sigfpe problem was present in the tests for both bash and check (building from xorg). Then I booted the latest system

Re: [lfs-support] LFS Bootscripts MD5

On 6/4/20 9:49 PM, flareonz...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone verify the correct MD5 for lfs-bootscripts-20191031.tar.xz? The stable book has a value starting with “e”, the development book has a value starting with 9, and manually calculating gets a value starting with “d”. I’m not sure which

Re: [lfs-support] DEV: Text and code do not match

And this required you to argue with one of the top developers on this project? I personally think you should apologize, but that's on you. Flareon Zulu Sorry, but because it is top developer I should refrain from any comment? In what world are you living? Frans

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On 5/26/20 11:43 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote: On 2020-05-26 18:17 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: I'm trying to discover why two tests in the testsuite for 'check' always fail for me. I've now got a response that the tests raise SIGFPE but do not receive it. The example is ken@plexi ~/check-debug $cat

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On 5/26/20 12:17 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: I'm trying to discover why two tests in the testsuite for 'check' always fail for me. I've now got a response that the tests raise SIGFPE but do not receive it. The example is ken@plexi ~/check-debug $cat test.c #include #include int main() {

Re: [lfs-support] Kernel Error

On 5/26/20 5:36 AM, Greekforce1821 wrote: Hello again! , I am experiencing some kind of errors in my bootable kernel. As you can see in the photo, when I reached the end of the guide and shutdown -r now the system, the kernel loaded but there were some kind of errors  about root. How can I fix

Re: [lfs-support] Test failures in vim-8.2.0486 with gcc-10.

On 5/24/20 12:27 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 04:11:53AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: This is LFS r11848 cross-chap5 branch from 13th May and I'm trying to understand why tests fail (although I don't always achieve any understanding). So, I gave vim's tests another try, but they

Re: [lfs-support] Test failures in vim-8.2.0486 with gcc-10.

On 5/24/20 12:27 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 04:11:53AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: This is LFS r11848 cross-chap5 branch from 13th May and I'm trying to understand why tests fail (although I don't always achieve any understanding). So, I gave vim's tests another try, but they

Re: [lfs-support] Test failures in vim-8.2.0486 with gcc-10.

On 5/23/20 10:11 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: I keep thinking I'm coming towards the end of my cross-chap5 build, but this latest test breakage makes me wonder - A few months ago I stopped running tests on vim after they hung all night on one of my machines (my TERM is rxvt-unicode, in chroot I

Re: [lfs-support] /tmp permissions resets after reboot

On 5/6/20 12:14 AM, Bud Rozwood wrote: Hi, For some reason my /tmp directory keeps resetting to 0755 and I would have to manually resetting back to the correct permissions 1777 everytime. I figured this out when I couldn't start my X server the other day and this was the issue. I did find

Re: [lfs-support] Can't login - cycles back

On 4/27/20 3:12 PM, Bud Rozwood wrote: On Monday, April 27, 2020, Bruce Dubbs <mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 4/27/20 3:04 PM, Bud Rozwood wrote: Hi, For some reason I can't login today and I am not sure why. The prompt for username and password

Re: [lfs-support] Checksum for Xorg Intel Video

On 4/26/20 4:36 PM, Bud Rozwood wrote: On Sunday, April 26, 2020, Bud Rozwood > wrote: Hi, I found that the MD5 checksum doesn't match the one for the stable BLFS for package xf86-video-intel-20200218. Actually, I've found that it matched the .bz2

Re: [lfs-support] Fwd: bug in /lib/lsb/init-functions

On 4/25/20 5:46 PM, Alexander Danel wrote: -- Forwarded message - From: *Alexander Danel* > Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 17:33 Subject: bug in /lib/lsb/init-functions To: > Found a bug.  I am looking

Re: [lfs-support] linux 5.5.9: shutdown -h hangs on detaching cdrom

On 4/18/20 6:30 AM, Stephen Berman wrote: On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 03:08:46 -0400 Michael Shell wrote: On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:41:27 +0200 Stephen Berman wrote: Another thing to try - does the problem persist if the CDROM is physically disconnected from the system (e.g., its SATA cable

Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC

On 4/12/20 10:12 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote: Am Sonntag, den 12.04.2020, 22:01 +0800 schrieb devin operline: Hi there, This is my 3rd attempt at getting through LFS for the first time using (Debian 10). It was a fresh install when I made my second attempt. Then hit this error and redid

Re: [lfs-support] linux 5.5.9: shutdown -h hangs on detaching cdrom

On 4/10/20 3:29 PM, Stephen Berman wrote: I've built current development LFS using jhalfs and when I invoke (via sudo or logged in as root) `shutdown -h now', the system appears to hang while trying to detach the cdrom block device. Here are the last two lines printed to the terminal after

Re: [lfs-support] Upgrade Kernel Version

On 4/8/20 1:21 PM, Furkan İnciroğlu wrote: On 4/7/20 2:31 AM, Furkan İnciroğlu wrote: Hi there, When I compiled LFS 8.4 systemd Linux kernel version was 4.20.12. I want to upgrade kernel version to 5.5 or else. I was wondering before doing this job, is it possible to break something in the

Re: [lfs-support] Upgrade Kernel Version

On 4/7/20 2:31 AM, Furkan İnciroğlu wrote: Hi there, When I compiled LFS 8.4 systemd Linux kernel version was 4.20.12. I want to upgrade kernel version to 5.5 or else. I was wondering before doing this job, is it possible to break something in the operating system when this upgrade is done?

Re: [lfs-support] GCC atomic test failure

On 3/29/20 9:07 AM, Rob wrote: In Chapter 6.25, GCC-9.2.0 We're in chroot. All else went ok, and then we have: Running /sources/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/atomic.exp ... WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c -O1 execution test WARNING: program timed

Re: [lfs-support] Linux kernel doesn't see partitions

On 3/26/20 3:03 PM, Jason Gauthier wrote: I'm to the point where grub needs to be installed. I've built LFS on a loopback device, so there isn't a physical drive to install grub to. I booted a debian recovery disk, and I installed and configured grub. Since I'm going to use this on a QEMU

Re: [lfs-support] build time comparison

On 3/6/20 6:11 AM, Thomas Seeling wrote: Hallo, I did some comparing of build times. Building was done on an older i5-6500 with 16 GB RAM, SATA harddisk and SSD. 9.1 build on SSD: The SBU unit value is equal to 117 seconds. Total time required to build the system:79.6 SBU

Re: [lfs-support] DBus-Broker

On 3/1/20 1:38 PM, Rob wrote: Are we considering switching from traditional DBus to this implementation? I'm told many distros are switching over, that this one is faster and more efficient. What says LFS? We would really need a lot of testing and documentation. What is the URL? Faster for

[lfs-support] LFS-9.1-rc1 is released

The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version 9.1-rc1. It is a preliminary release of LFS-9.1. Major changes include toolchain updates to binutils-2.34 and glibc-2.31. In total, 36 packages were updated since the last release. Changes to the text have also been made

Re: [lfs-support] Build New Driver after LFS

On 2/4/20 10:47 AM, Furkan İnciroğlu wrote: Hi there, After my LFS-BLFS compilation, I delete all my tools and other build directories. Now, I have to build some driver such as igb and mmc disk driver. When I download igb tar.gz and extract, I run make install command but it says:

Re: [lfs-support] Different version of automake needed.

On 2/3/20 1:14 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 03/02/2020 à 18:11, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : On 2/3/20 9:58 AM, Pitmaster wrote: Hi there all, I have found this problem. I am trying to make LFS 9.0 on my Intel NUC (i5 16 gig mem) Ubuntu 18.04 LTS installed. At compiling Bison-3.4.1 make gave back

Re: [lfs-support] Different version of automake needed.

On 2/3/20 9:58 AM, Pitmaster wrote: Hi there all, I have found this problem. I am trying to make LFS 9.0 on my Intel NUC (i5 16 gig mem) Ubuntu 18.04 LTS installed. At compiling Bison-3.4.1 make gave back the error that it needed automake 1.16. That is a problem for all people using Ubuntu

Re: [lfs-support] Install texinfo on Centos7 / CentOS Linux 7 (Core)

On 1/26/20 3:52 PM, knothea...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to install texinfo on this server; how do i get it installed? [root@lfs-wk ~]# hostnamectl    Static hostname: lfs-wk.shadowman.lab          Icon name: computer-vm            Chassis: vm         Machine ID:

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc2.30 1st pass failed: 'time' alias in time.c

On 1/26/20 12:41 PM, Flareon wrote: On January 26, 2020, at 04:10, Xi Ruoyao wrote: >On 2020-01-26 15:13 +0530, Sourabh Sagar wrote: >> One thread recommend use of '-Wno-attribute-alias' ... when using it glibc2.30 >> compiled successfully(in a separate sub-directory)... >Don't reference

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc2.30 1st pass failed: 'time' alias in time.c

On 1/25/20 11:23 PM, Sourabh Sagar wrote: # ./version_check.sh GNU bash, version 5.0.3(1)-release --Error: /bin/sh doesn't point to bash- First fix this. Then start over. -- Bruce Binutils: GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.31.1 bison (GNU Bison) 3.3.2 /usr/bin/yacc --->

Re: [lfs-support] Building editor-manual

On 1/22/20 8:29 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote: This link does not exist any more http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/1.69.1/xhtml/profile-docbook.xsl I can confirm this, it seems that the oldest version that they have available on Sourceforge is 1.70.1 (2006-05-26 is the datestamp).

Re: [lfs-support] Building editor-manual

On 1/22/20 12:15 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote: On 1/22/20 11:40 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: I am trying to build the lfs editor manual after downloading the source with svn executing make nochunks returns the following error  $ make nochunks xsltproc --xinclude --nonet -stringparam

Re: [lfs-support] LFS for ARM

On 1/20/20 2:49 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: My foray into building LFS on the raspberry pi platform has went extremely well.  I am thinking about taking the LFS book that is currently available and modifying it for the ARM platform.  The required changes are not many.  This may turn out to be a

Re: [lfs-support] Raspberry pi

On 1/5/20 1:34 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: Looking to see if there is any interest for LFS running on Raspberry pi hardware here? I am currently working to get a build of LFS working on some raspberry pi 4 hardware. I have LFS version 8.4 running on Rpi 2 and Rpi3 which I currently use them for

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Localedef Problem

On 1/5/20 10:41 AM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: What do you use for backup on Linux? For many years, on my Windows computer, I've had two extra backup disks installed, and use Acronis to do incremental backups to  one of those disks every day. Every couple of weeks I switch the backup to the

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-9.0 5.24. Gettext-0.20.1 build error

On 1/5/20 8:01 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: This is what I used in the build: ./configure --disable-shared make -j1 The result: [snip] make[2]: Entering directory '/mnt/lfs/source/gettext-0.20.1/gettext-tools/src' here=`pwd`; \ cd ../../libtextstyle/lib && \   make

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-9.0 5.24. Gettext-0.20.1 build error

On 1/4/20 7:45 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 05:11:18PM -0500, Scott Andrews wrote: On 1/4/20 1:45 PM, Flareon Zulu wrote: On January 4, 2020, at 09:47, Scott Andrews wrote: Anyone have this error? ar cr libgrep.a glthread/lock.o glthread/threadlib.o kwset.o m-fgrep.o

Re: [lfs-support] Failure Building Cyrus and OpenLDAP

On 1/4/20 7:15 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: On 1/4/2020 12:59 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote: On 2020-01-04 10:56 -0700，Alan Feuerbacher wrote: I'm not sure if this should go to the lfs or blfs support list, since I'm still in the chroot environment at the end of the LFS book, but am installing several

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-9.0 5.24. Gettext-0.20.1 build error

On 1/4/20 4:11 PM, Scott Andrews wrote: On 1/4/20 1:45 PM, Flareon Zulu wrote: On January 4, 2020, at 09:47, Scott Andrews wrote: >Anyone have this error? >ar cr libgrep.a glthread/lock.o glthread/threadlib.o kwset.o m-fgrep.o >m-regex.o mbrlen.o regex.o >ranlib libgrep.a >make[3]:

Re: [lfs-support] login as root -- su root OR su - root ?

OK everybody. Drop this thread. We do not want personal attacks on our mailing lists. Keep it technical and things will be fine. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-support] login as root -- su root OR su - root ?

On 12/31/19 11:30 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: On 12/31/2019 5:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 12/31/19 4:47 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: Another question on building LFS Version 20191222-systemd: In Section "5.37. Changing Ownership" there's a Note: "The commands in the remaind

Re: [lfs-support] login as root -- su root OR su - root ?

On 12/31/19 4:47 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: Another question on building LFS Version 20191222-systemd: In Section "5.37. Changing Ownership" there's a Note: "The commands in the remainder of this book must be performed while logged in as user root and no longer as user lfs. Also, double check

Re: [lfs-support] Checksum Error in Version 20191222-systemd

On 12/31/19 3:37 PM, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: On 12/31/19, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: On 12/30/19, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 12/30/19 4:20 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: In section "3.1 Introduction" checking checksums shows an error for line 61: python-3.8.1-docs... OK, it's been fixe

Re: [lfs-support] Checksum Error in Version 20191222-systemd

On 12/30/19 4:20 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: In section "3.1 Introduction" checking checksums shows an error for line 61: python-3.8.1-docs... OK, it's been fixed. Thanks. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html

Re: [lfs-support] Chroot Path Problem for Python

On 12/29/19 10:41 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: On 12/29/2019 4:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 12/29/19 4:57 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 09:02:34PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 01:40:17PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 12/29/19 12:03 PM, Alan Feuerbacher

Re: [lfs-support] Chroot Path Problem for Python

On 12/29/19 4:57 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 09:02:34PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 01:40:17PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 12/29/19 12:03 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: On 12/29/2019 9:35 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 12/29/19 9:45 AM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote

Re: [lfs-support] Chroot Path Problem for Python

On 12/29/19 12:03 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: On 12/29/2019 9:35 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 12/29/19 9:45 AM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: I'm building LFS Version 20191222-systemd, and have run into a problem I've not seen before. I've entered the Chroot Environment section and have gotten up

Re: [lfs-support] Chroot Path Problem for Python

On 12/29/19 9:45 AM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: I'm building LFS Version 20191222-systemd, and have run into a problem I've not seen before. I've entered the Chroot Environment section and have gotten up to building glibc. Configure for glibc failed for the Python3 check. For some reason, the

Re: [lfs-support] kernel compilation requires cpio?

On 11/30/19 3:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 11/30/19 1:15 PM, Thomas Seeling wrote: Hallo, I started LFS 9.0 on a fresh partition and it stopped at step 158 (of my jhalfs numbering) where it compiles the kernel ... it nearly finishes but then complains about cpio missing.    CC  kernel

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >