On our website,
"http://velocitysoftware.com/present/flowchrt.html; , there is a
performance analysis flow chart. When there is wait, it is MOST often
not related to the linux server, it is MOST likely to be related to
resource constraints that the server just happens to be using (cpu,
Of Barton
Robinson
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 7:53 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: CPU Steal on Linux Guest
How much of your IFLs are in use by the other LPAR(s)?
On 12/19/2016 2:19 PM, Victor Echavarry Diaz wrote:
Can someone explain why CPU steal is? We believe that when the VM
How much of your IFLs are in use by the other LPAR(s)?
On 12/19/2016 2:19 PM, Victor Echavarry Diaz wrote:
Can someone explain why CPU steal is? We believe that when the VM LPAR is using
almost all is IFL's CPU stealing begins between guests. But today this specific
LPAR has 4 IFL and is
Yah, I've yet to see any data justifying wasting disk (except to get a
lunch from your disk vendor) for swap space instead of just moving the
extra disks to be part of the paging subsystem. If anybody has any data
that they think justifies this position, please send it.
VDISK gets paged out to
For those interested. We have a project to replace xcat/smapi with a
full backend for openstack on z/vm as part of our zpro offering. The
objective is for a user of openstack to have control over a z/vm service
the same as their vmware service.
Since our API already includes any or none of
No, monitor data does NOT contain storage information from other
LPARs. The CPU information comes from the HMC and is only available to
show CPU consumption by the LPAR - nothing within.
On 1/5/2016 6:28 AM, Grzegorz Powiedziuk wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to capture performance data with
I believe CMMA was withdrawn, and function completely removed in SLES 11.
On 12/18/2015 10:12 AM, Davis, Jim [PRI-1PP] wrote:
I am a systems programmer at Primerica Life Insurance.
We have been running SLES linux under VM for nine years.
We only have four production VMs on one lpar using a
experiment). End result was 40,000 less pages on
disk space and a LOT of page reads. Too bad no one from Endicott sees
my presentations.
On 12/11/2015 4:33 AM, Bill Holder wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:05:26 -0800, Barton Robinson wrote:
If anybody in endicott is listening, ONE REQUEST
It couldn't be pgmbk, this was a result of a LINUX CMM command, and it
was the Linux storage assigned to the virtual machine that was targeted.
On 12/11/2015 11:01 AM, Bill Holder wrote:
Barton Robinson wrote:
Drop another 20,000 pages, and there
are 40,000 page reads (and 20,000 page writes
Altmark wrote:
On Wednesday, 12/09/2015 at 08:15 GMT, Barton Robinson
<bar...@velocitysoftware.com> wrote:
My request to get this fixed was rejected by ibm several years ago. The
problem is that even though linux doesn't have anything on the vdisk,
z/vm still has to back it. I asked for a di
My request to get this fixed was rejected by ibm several years ago. The
problem is that even though linux doesn't have anything on the vdisk,
z/vm still has to back it. I asked for a diagnose as we do with real
storage - a way for Linux to tell z/vm the page no longer needs
backing. So after
No, please don't do this. Having weights in the 1000's is what causes
this problem, creates excess share, the looping user takes over.
If you don't understand excess share, keep shares in the 100's, and use
absolute shares where you know exactly what is intended.
On 10/28/2015 7:13 AM,
The best way is to first understand your share settings and avoid excess
share.See Rob's paper on the topic
here "http://www.velocitysoftware.com/relshare.HTML;
Use zalert to detect problems, and have zoperator to give your
operations and applications people early indication.
i believe you
Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Barton
Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 11:30 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Help with cpu stealing
No, please don't do this. Having weights in the 1000's is what causes
this problem, creates excess share, the looping user
This is the reason I have re-invested in a full rewrite of ZPRO to
completely eliminate any need for SMAPI. Our community objectives
should be to make our systems easier to implement and maintain.
Companies are not investing in the training as in the past, skills are
harder to acquire, and
There is a GSE conference for Linux, z/VM and z/VSE in Stuttgart Germany
in 3 weeks. That same week, there is a performance class that will show
how to get exactly what you want using zVPS
"http://velocitysoftware.com/zvps.html;. If you care about performance
of Linux under z/VM, you need the
bc12 moved successfully and is back up.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
Due to system upgrade, Velocity Software and other hosted sites will be
down today. Note these websites all run under z/VM on a BC12, secured
by RACF. Our growth, current projects, and many projected future
projects require a move to a larger space.
We are looking at a large number of
Hardware maintenance means the Velocity Software and LinuxVM.ORG
websites are temporarily down, as are a few of the local user groups
that we host. back up shortly
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
0.0
On 7/9/2015 9:31 AM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
Barton,
It reports on the /proc/buddyinfo values and anticipates vmcp failing?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Barton Robinson
bar...@velocitysoftware.com wrote:
And a good performance monitor would already have this reported - down
And a good performance monitor would already have this reported - down
to the process level.
On 7/9/2015 9:06 AM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
Let me answer my own question. Perhaps kludgy, but by adding 'tee' to
sudo, this technique works:
root@lab141:~ # visudo
root@lab141:~ # tail -1
or you could do it from z/vm with ZVWS. It is very fast, and trivial to
use.
On 3/19/2015 8:40 AM, Vitale, Joseph wrote:
Hello,
I need to install a simple Web Server to server up 1 file. Internal load
balancing requirement.
Looked at Apache Web site, found binaries for Windows and Linux
I've looked at the amazon and google chargeback models. One of their
options is a fixed price until some number of CPU hours is exceeded.
This allows the 'easy' fixed fee, but also controls the resource
abuser. You would have to have tools in place to alert the abuser that
they have gone
zPRO has been out for about 4 years and was a project started almost 10
years ago. We had many customers create their own self service
applications using our web technology, it seemed reasonable to take
their ideas and make a common product.
ZPRO V2 is built on ALL native z/VM functionality,
AMEN
On 11/19/2014 9:38 AM, Mark Post wrote:
On 11/19/2014 at 03:18 AM, Guest, Darren darren.gu...@uk.experian.com
wrote:
Mark, are you suggesting that the Oracle team should have some actual data to
back up their claims? Not just a bloke with a stopwatch and an uneasy
feeling?! ;-) But yes,
I just had an installation demonstrate the perfect tool for you. In
looking at what alerts should be set for operations, one of their many
zlinux servers had a swap full condition. They were able to go back
thru reports from last 12 months, took less than a minute to identify
when the swap
, and what caused it? Or do you just
reboot?
On 11/9/2014 1:38 PM, Tito Garrido wrote:
If you are going to try SAR take a look on KSAR project...
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ksar/
Regards,
Tito
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Barton Robinson bar...@velocitysoftware.com
wrote:
I just had
Our software (zVPS) is not free, but is no charge for POC. Our mission
is to help you succeed with the Linux on z POC.
On 8/25/2014 7:46 PM, Martin, Terry Contractor wrote:
I am in the same boat. I would like to use Velocity for my client but since is
a POC they want to sick with something
The RMFPMS was a brilliant but misguided piece of software that the
author stopped supporting about 10 years ago. If it costs several IFLs
to run free software, there's a lot of misguidance going around
The best thing about some of these tools is that your management can't
tell what their
Dear all,
we are offering our famous performance class for the VM-Workshop
attendees, on 24 25 June, in North Carolina.
For registration and more details please visit:
http://velocitysoftware.com/seminar/workshop.html
Please reach out with any questions.
Best wishes and see you in North
zOPERATOR, a no charge feature of zVPS (from Velocity Software) can
accept and record and respond to messages.
On 3/13/2014 9:13 PM, Morris, Kevin J. (RET-DAY) wrote:
I would like to send all operator messages to a zLinux guest for further
processing/storage, essentially replacing PROP. Is
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Barton
Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:23 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Swap behavior change between SLES 11SP2 and 11SP3?
With all of the installations (100s) i've worked
With all of the installations (100s) i've worked with using vdisk for
swap, this would be the first complaint i've heard with the exception of
some bad configuration defaults. If you had really good performance
management tools, I'd be happy to look at the data.
On 1/15/2014 5:44 AM, Veencamp,
This could be just new year workload. Or someone is running some new
scripts that are consuming LARGE amounts of CPU. The data shows nothing
strange in the CPU distribution between servers:
Report: ESAUSP2
---CPU time--
UserID (Percent) T:V
/Class Total Virt Rat
-
issues. IBM has a workaround you can GOOGLE.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Barton
Robinson
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 12:19 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: High cpu utilization on vm/linux LPAR
This could be just
Due to hardware upgrade, several websites that we host on our z/VM
systems will be down on thursday. This includes:
LINUXVM.ORG
LINUXVM.COM
VelocitySoftware.com
DEMO.VelocitySoftware.com
If everything goes write, the new Velocity Cloud will be much bigger
than ever on Friday. Our VERY old P390
Guys, you DO know I read this stuff?
Anybody that knows me, had a beer with me, or much about my business
would never imagine me working for someone else. I work hard at being a
technology leader - that means investing in things the bean counters
can't even imagine having value, investing in a
Mauro, please Read That Fine Manual/article again, licensing does NOT
equal acquisition.
product news
CA Technologies Signs Global Licensing and Distribution Agreement with
Velocity Software, a Leading Linux Performance Management Company
...@gmail.com
This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Barton Robinson
bar...@velocitysoftware.com wrote:
Mauro, please Read That Fine Manual/article again, licensing does NOT
equal acquisition.
product news
CA Technologies Signs Global Licensing
Really good performance monitors would give you lots of good information.
On 10/2/2013 4:28 AM, van Sleeuwen, Berry wrote:
If anything I even would like to decrease the memory configuration rather than
increase it. Unfortunately I got overruled by the Oracle guys who still think
more memory
dedicated IFL's or GPs always look 100% busy from the LPAR perspective,
and that is the data fed into RMF or CP Monitor
On 8/20/2013 9:01 AM, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
My VM/Linux guy came to me with a several disparate displays (a HMC Activity
Display, a TMONMVS LPAR Summary screen and s
CMMA is gone, didn't work right and support was pulled.
VMRM does not have proper feedback and is more likely to crash your
linux server than help
CPUPLUGD - never seen any measured value.
Focus on understanding the storage requirements. One of the
presentations at the VMWorkshop last week was
I've seen several installations over the last few years build their own
web based applications for cloning. That was my incentive for producing
a low cost web based application that included cloning
(http://VelocitySoftware.com/zpro.html;) and to provide some level of
standardization.
How many
If you investigate the ESALNXP report provided by ZVPS, you will see a
cron job with your latest patches, and not before that. One just
needs good tools
Srivastava, Sagar wrote:
We implemented latest patches on our SLES11 SP1 systems recently
Now all the zLINUX guest are using
please make 20% of your storage ExStore. This only matters if you are
storage constrained, so benchmarking differences when there are no
constraints will not show a difference. When you become storage
constrained, the 20% ExStore will easily show better performance.
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
It's called zTUNE. http://velocitysoftware.com/zztune.html;
Michel Beaulieu wrote:
Hello Linux-390,
I know this is the LINUX-390 list,
However, let me ask:
Do we have any equivalent System Health Checker for z/VM?
Michel Beaulieu
IBM SO-Delivery (Canada)
And ZVPS from Velocity Software supports microsoft as well as linux on
x86 for operations as well as full performance management.
David Boyes wrote:
Looking at the Microsoft websites (not very
helpful of course, more marketing, little
technical) for SCOM (System Center Operations Manager 2007
one lpar works well, shares storage, shares other resources, reduces
overhead, reduces system programming efforts, reduces costs. And I can
show other mixed mode LPARs with both VSE and linux in the same LPAR.
Was it a hardware vendor recommending increasing your hardware costs
Michael
Re performance, there has been no need to change time slice since qdio,
about 5 years ago.
Offer Baruch wrote:
Hi all,
Well we conducted another test (much better than the last one - it had too many
unpredictable variables):
1. 1 destination machine let's call it dest1
2. dest1 has 2 nics
Before I get REALLY excited, has anyone tried this and validated they
can get Linux servers running WAS to drop from QUEUE (as in drop from
QUEUE 3)?
Jim Elliott wrote:
I don't believe this has been posted here before, but IBM has
published a TechDoc on this subject.
Are you looking at monitoring network traffic? uptime? availability?
resource consumption? ZVPS ( http://velocitysoftware.com/zvps.html; )
does all that and more.
Kowalski, Steve S wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone using any monitoring tool (except the MOSS Console) for Communication
Controller for
I really despise the system defaults of REL 1500, or REL 5000. They
seem (were) provided by someone ignorant of how the scheduler actually
works.
Rob has a nice paper showing the damage. Though ibm might try and code
around how this damage impacts your system, changing these defaults to
it's really hard to make the mondcss go away unless there was a purge
done, and when the application went away, so did the dcss
Dean, David (I/S) wrote:
How do you make MONDCSS permanent? We IPL'd, the segment did not come back,
and monitoring is not working. I know how to set it up
Just in from IBM systems magazine. CICS on z/os workloads moving to
Linux on z. wow.
Organizations are consolidating workloads onto Linux on IBM System z to
lower costs, standardize operations and enhance IT flexibility. Now you
can move online and batch mainframe applications to scalable
: Barton Robinson bar...@vm1.velocity-software.com
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Date: 03/18/2011 04:04 PM
Subject:Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from the field?
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
wow, your DBAs have the authority to spend
wow, your DBAs have the authority to spend that kind of money and make
that kind of change without management signature? So no financial
analysis, no technical reason, sounds religious.
CHAPLIN, JAMES (CTR) wrote:
We just had a surprise announcement by one of the Oracle DBAs during a
zLinux
Well, since you are ready.
First, Oracle is VERY virtual friendly. And has been the most virtual
friendly application there is.
BUT, if you use RAC, it seems that someone decided to compete in the
virtual hostile arena by making it poll at a high enough rate to
ensure you need to buy a LOT
For those of you interested in performance, or performance management of
your Linux and z/VM environment, our Performance Education schedule is
now posted for 1st half, at
http://velocitysoftware.com/seminar/index.html;.
Offerings are the 4 day workshop and 1 day seminars.
Rules of thumb change, or get old. The linux spin locking has greatly
improved. new evidence is showing that letting z/vm do the scheduling
is more efficient for later releases of Linux - as long as there are no
spin locks occurring. For example, in a one-ifl configuration, having
WAS servers
The consideration is the LPAR overhead. The more dispatching there is,
the more is the physical overhead. I've seen that running as high as
5% of each processor on overcommitted systems, and .1% normally.
Joe Martin wrote:
Have a development system that has 2 IFLs and both are configured to the
Isn't the real problem that the VMWare vendor(s) does a LOT of
advertising and marketing, and the z/VM vendor does not (other than
preaching to the choir)?
Graves, Aaron wrote:
The implication is that these represent the leading edge of
virtualization, completely ignoring z/VM's capabilities.
Yes, this is a problem. We call it virtual hostile. Rob van der Heij
has been doing a tremendous amount of research in this area for the last
4 years, we've been trying to educate our customers (and IBM) on what
this means.
Back in 2001, there was the Linux timer, had the same problem. Got
Yep, this is exactly the problem. These processes do not use much
cpu, but they blip every 10ms or so. You need to check the queue from
the z/VM side to see if they are in Q3. If in Q3, then they are blipping
(think i need to trademark that word).
The reason these blips are so virtual
But, Oracle is VERY virtual friendly, and DB2 is VERY virtual HOSTILE.
From a system performance perspective, I REALLY LIKE Oracle.
Mark Post wrote:
On 7/30/2010 at 12:03 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Does this make Oracle a better fit on Linux on z than DB2?
That
So the biggest announcement of the year, i'm on my second pot of coffee,
and there's still only one post about this? Is this a non-event?
Dave Jones wrote:
And what's old is new againthere's a water cooled version of the
z196. :-)
DJ
On 07/22/2010 06:38 AM, Jim Elliott wrote:
The IBM
-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Barton
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 8:33 AM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] IBM zEnterprise System announced???
So the biggest announcement of the year, i'm on my second pot of coffee,
and there's still only one post about this? Is this a non
announced)
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Thursday, 07/22/2010 at 11:34 EDT, Barton Robinson
bar...@vm1.velocity-software.com wrote:
So the biggest announcement of the year, i'm on my second pot of coffee,
and there's still only one post about this? Is this a non-event?
Kind of hard to talk about
You really need a decent performance monitor. I can already see that
your settings would not be my view of best practices
Rogério Soares wrote:
Listeners,
I have a strange problem again...
on my lpar for development, i have now queue E3, each time a run #cp q exp i
have a different
way more miles than birds. am at ibm university in Berlin now. Was
not allowed to present though (or at least didn't want to pay 1000s of
euros to do so, but the beer and company is all good). Y'all think the
life of a performance guy is easy?
Mark Post wrote:
On 5/19/2010 at 05:22 AM, Shane G
So, monitoring mainframe software is really about MANAGING, this is
not the pc world. Does your objectives have anything to do with the
following disciplines:
1) Performance analysis including all subsystems (DASD, Storage, PAging,
CPU, Network)
2) Capacity Planning (same subsystems), with
Any chance VMRM was active and too storage away?
Mark Perry wrote:
Hi Ron,
thats a support question if ever I heard one. Contact SAP/IBM. (Which of
course will lead to a question on maintenace levels of linux and sap.)
If kill -9 doesn't work then the process is in a system routine that can be
There are many samples on the customer area of our website in:
http://velocitysoftware.com/customer/tips/index.html; beyond what is
shipped with the product.
Rodery, Floyd A Mr CIV US DISA CDB12 wrote:
I was curious if anyone is sending alerts to their enterprise monitor
using Velocity's
IF you have a good performance monitor, you would know exactly what
process on what server is using CPU.
With zVPS (ESALPS), on one screen, you can see ALL the top processes
across your entire Linux farm, with one PFK, you can sort them by cpu.
Knowing where your cpu is going means you can do
of looking at their code.
/Brad
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Barton
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:09 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Poor WebLogic Performance
IF you have a good performance monitor, you would
First rule of thumb, don't guess. Since Oracle SGA can be anywhere from
a few hundred megabytes to 10's of gigabytes, you need to size the
server larger than the SGA. If you undersize the server, you WILL have
undesirable performance. On intel they size based on low cost of
storage and I/O
I think you are missing several things. (And jiffies are in 10ms
increments, not 1ms increments)
First, have you verified the accuracy of your CPU numbers? Does RHEL4
include the steal timer patch and is it working correctly on both VMWare
and z/VM? Even with current levels of Linux and z/VM,
Or even keep one minute data, 15 minute data, and/or any other
combination you would like, all at the same time.
Thomas Kern wrote:
If a customer were having a problem with a particular linux guest, could
they modify that ESALPS condensation process, say to condense after a
week? Or condense
Martin, please correct me if i am wrong.
Large page support supports 1mb pages - meaning consecutive 256 4k pages
in hardware. These pages are fixed, are not pageable with current
technology. The advantage is that there is one TLB entry per megabyte
instead of one per 4k page, so that the TLB is
Having seen a very good performance presentation from IBM on the value
of huge pages, I'm interested in knowing what value y'all expect from this?
Mark Post wrote:
On 11/27/2009 at 12:36 PM, Szefler Jakub - Hurt TP
jakub.szef...@telekomunikacja.pl wrote:
Yes :) It may be poorly understood.
I
I thought IBM stopped pushing RMFPM about 5 years ago because of
overhead and lack of development interest? This was developed in the RMF
lab for installations that were z/OS, no z/VM and running Linux in an
LPAR. Ask your boss to talk to references (for something that has been
out almost 10
So you should probably measure the two before deciding on which one you
want to keep. CMM-1 has very positive results, cmma not so positive.
Leland Lucius wrote:
Mark Post wrote:
On 9/22/2009 at 11:35 PM, Leland Lucius lluc...@homerow.net wrote:
Is it being removed entirely or will distros be
Mike, CMM does require a collaborative piece. Or one can tune the
system manually with CMM commands, but that gets boring. VMRM should
have been enough, but it has very poor feed back mechanisms, and has no
clue about what is happening inside Linux. It is thus severely limited,
has lots of
Xenia, wouldn't it be better if VMRM didn't have to depend on users
remembering to do this as their workload changes? If they have one large
server say with a large oracle application, the minimum value setting
would have to be the minimum for this server? So all servers are treated
and trimmed
VM does have a single performance/capacity/accounting data stream, it
is provided via Velocity Software's Linux Performance Suite. It includes
Linux data to the process, application and user level, as well as all
the z/VM data. But you knew that?
Thomas Kern wrote:
It would be nice if linux
Yes, done, ESALPS provides you all the data you want.
Scott Rohling wrote:
Has anyone played around with using the VM accounting data, along with Linux
usage data (sar data for example - capturing process usage) to come up with
a way to assign usage as the VM level (i.e. host CPU hours) to
So your contract negotiations people need to be educated on how to
negotiate a much lower ELA?
William D Carroll wrote:
Again
ELA, that's licensing per core depending on your ELA can change.
again, depending on company and size. WAS for us was a moot point
as was Oracle, DB2 etc.. no
If the kernel in a DSS is there for storage (RAM) reasons, i would
recommend against it. There are 3 ways of sharing storage (RAM) that
are effective,
1) kernel in NSS (named saved system) that saves about 1mb per server,
clumsy, very restrictive, and savings not worth the effort
2) XIP
Make sure that IF there are additional CPU requirements, you measure
them before committing to production. Some installations in the past
have seen significant increases - SAG has made improvements, so don't
take my word/experience as gospel, measure it...
Saulo Silva wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I know
Have you also thought about Capacity planning, chargeback/accounting,
and operational alerts? Performance monitoring of z/VM and Linux is only
one small part of performance management.
And also look for availability of performance education.
Nelson, Gene C. wrote:
We are setting up an SLES 10
received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Barton Robinson
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:15 PM
Because I get asked often about accounting and charge back for Linux
processes, z/VM virtual machines, and Linux applications, I've put up
more material explaining what data is available, and how to get that
data. The web page is at http://www.VelocitySoftware.com/account.html;
I think if you look at the agenda of both, there is quite a difference.
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
This SIG seems to be the same education available, free, at other
locations also.
See the announcement at the bottom of this email:
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
Barton Robinson bar...@vm1.velocity
Any one that is interested in running Oracle on Z, the conference will
be held in 3 weeks: http://www.zseriesoraclesig.org/;.
As part of the very low cost, there are added workshops included in the
price. If interested in Linux and z/VM Performance as well as Oracle,
this would be a perfect
The following link is provided for this industry at no charge:
http://velocitysoftware.com/jobs/;
This is for posting jobs available and wanted for the VM, VSE and Linux
platforms.
Mark Barajas wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I have a question about etiquette of postings into this email list.
If anyone is interested in Oracle on zLinux, this conference:
http://www.zseriesoraclesig.org/; would be of great interest. It will
be a pretty intense week, and for the price is one of the best price
performers in the conference calender.
Price of hardware is only a small percentage of the total cost. It's
just easy to focus on when politics is playing a big part in the
comparison.
What the real costs are: software, people, management, floorspace and
other environmentals. If it costs you an extra $50,000 for storage, but
you save
FYI, the ORACLE SIG (Special Interest Group) for z is Apr 20-24, and
I'm teaching the last 2 days of it, in Mountain View.
dalesm...@nisource.com wrote:
Due to a late start on my part for planning the January meeting, I was not
able to get enough speakers for the meeting, so I am unfortunately
Go to ibm redbooks, search on XIP and ORACLE. The redbook is not just
oracle, but Oracle(IBM) paid for the redbook, and thus the research.
XIP is the 2nd best way to reduce Linux storage requirements.
Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Hi
I am looking into XIP and I am
Velocity Software is announcing zPRO, a portal for z/VM systems
management. Functionality includes provisioning/cloning, as well as
interfaces to many systems management functions for z/VM. More details
can be found at http://velocitysoftware.com/zpro.html;. zPRO will be
put up soon on our
We use SMAPI partially. It's too slow to be really useful.
Jack Woehr wrote:
Barton Robinson wrote:
Velocity Software is announcing zPRO, a portal for z/VM systems
management.
Barton, from the description on the cited page, you go well beyond
what SMAPI does (out of the box) ... Since it's
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
