IK See this bug for more info:
IK http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63054
Well, I guess people that want it should vote for this bug...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425/\
EL Actualy we don't owe them anything mozilla might has been a nice project
EL but seriously.
EL konqurer and opera are doing much better job
Very debatable claim.
EL opera might not be complitly free but it's the best linux browser I saw so
EL far it doesn't crash at all it's VERY fast and
EL If asked I'm sure they would add that feature.
Yeah, somewhere in this millennium. Thanks a lot, by this time my
grandchildren will read it for me, so I would not care then.
EL how about instead of saying opera lacking some features get
EL people who would but it (yea paying it's not that
MT the Windows MSIE used to suck bigtime as well. theyv'e got the corporate
MT funding and manpower to improve it. and they will.
I do not believe that. Solaris MSIE was proof of concept product. It had
played it's purpose, there's no slightest reason to spend on it any more -
it will never be
EL Hi, Is there any alternative program for SSH-win? and a free
EL program?
There's SecureCRT (not free) and there's some plugins to TeraTerm (don't
remember if it's free). I saw once a free command-line client, but not a
GUI one.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
I remember I saw it one, somehere... it's not a linux specific but
There's a version of MSIE for Solaris - that's what they call MSIE for
UNIX. I have yet to see one person that saw it (MSIE for Solaris) and
doesn't think it sucks big time.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels
OA True. also - a lot of scripts (which of course don't check for
OA browser support other then document.all vs. document.layers) use
OA document.all and no other IE specific extensions which isn't in
OA the DOM.
Well, these scripts are antic and will die out, as soon as Netscape 4 dies
out.
IK As to KHTML (used by Konq), it's much more forgiving than Mozilla.
IK Heck, it implements a 'document.all' object (for IE compatibility)!
If it implements full MSIE DOM (including all properties and methods ans
stuff) it's cool. But somehow I doubt it. But if it does not, this only
means they
TC Actually the latest news is that the newest nightly builds of mozilla
TC /should/ contain bidi support compiled in (haven't tried it yet. just read
TC a message in a newgroup).
Does this mean there's a chance 0.9.[12] will have BiDi in? Can I
already order wine and candies to celebrate? :)
MR Unfortunately their site is rendered wrong in konqueror, but I'm
MR not sure which side is buggy.
I fear it's Konq. I saw a number of sites rendered OK with Mozilla but bad
with Konq. Or Mozilla is very forgiving (which rises aquestion why Konq
isn't), or Konq is buggy.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gk not terribly good portability, according to
gk /usr/src/linux/Documentatino/mandatory.txt , for mandatory locks?
gk advisory locks can be used, but then you only have a single such lock
gk available per file. if you need to use several locks, you need to keep
What? You sure should use
OA I don't think its an option I have for the current
OA implementation - it's file IO, and should be much slower, right
OA ?
Wrong. Record locking has nothing to do with file I/O - it is done
entirely in memory.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev
OA I'll think about, but I don't think I'll change from semaphores just yet.
OA I don't like the idea of creating temp files for locks, and I can't lock
Actually, cleaning temp file is by far easier than cleaning semaphore.
Especially if your app can be killed any moment.
OA against an existing
ML cares ?) each in its own VEnv on top of ME or 2000. Although the
ML price on macs is 70 $ for a PC DOS version, VPC for PCs will
ML cost... 299 $. I suppose the price tag will fall by the day.
VMWare WS costs exactly $299. Coincidence? :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be
This is not a PROBLEM but a FEATURE. All Sys-V IPC (semaphores,
message queues, shared memory) outlive their creators.
Wrong. Shared memory can be pre-deleted, so that it is removed when last
process is detached. Just like files. Semaphores can not. In fact, there's
no good way to insure that
OA One more semaphore question if you please - if I create a semaphoer set,
OA and then leave it lying around and exit the process - will it stay in the
OA system when no current process uses it ?
Yes. This is one of the problems with semaphores. BTW, why not using file
locking instead of it? It
OG Can anyone point me to a list of public NTP servers in Israel. A
There's ntp.ac.il, and there are ntp.tau.ac.il, ntp.technion.ac.il
and I guess more, most of them uses ntp.ac.il. I'm not sure about others,
but ntp.ac.il is public.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
AB timeserver.iix.net.il | ntp.iix.net.il| stratum 2 | public
AB ntp.ilan.net.il| ntp.ac.il | stratum 0/1 | only stratum 2
AB servers
Seems that ntp.ac.il still allows connection to everybody. But then it's
ABThis thread is a bit moot. TAU's policy stands, and that is
AB what we require for the free service we provide.
That's what I thought it is, right? We do it because we can, not because
it has any reason behind it... Well, you in are your own right, and
nobody will sue you because he's
YR I believe you're missing a crucial point. I believe that
YR wu-ftpd does not only verify that a certain IP address has a PTR
YR record, but it also ensures that the PTR's respective A record
YR is identical to the original IP address. The previous statement
So? That's why I wrote If I also
SK 530- It seems your IP address isn't properly registered in
SK 530-the DNS - You must allow reverse DNS lookups.
What I can't get in this story - what is the meaning of this restriction?
Like, what for do you need reverse DNS? What it gives to you? Just to show
that you are security-tough guy
YR It provides a better audit trail. It is trivial to setup PTR records, and
Just how better? Why PTR (which can be easily faked) is better than
IP, which determines uniquely the offending host?
As for triviality, many things are trivial to do and yet it is not the
reason to require people to
NSC On one hand you're holding the flag of open source and free
NSC code. And on the other hand, you're saying that uithout 300
NSC shekels an hour, you're not gonna get off your ass. You sound
NSC alot more like a Microsoft developer than a Linux developer.
That's bull. If you ask somebody to
OZ There is a separate mailing list for newbie questions, and the regular
OZ Linux-IL subscribers' time is too precious for clueless newbie questions.
Franskly speaking, I'm freaking stunned such a topic is discussed on the
list at such length, and with such an arguments. First, is this Linux-IL
EB Just started to write PHP and I cant find an IDE which
EB will give me good debugging capabilities (step, break
EB points ).
EB
EB Anybody can recommend one to me ?
Zend IDE, but it's not free.
There's also a free one, which claims to support debugging (nexus?), but I
don't know how good
NM It's wrong because that's not the idea of linux, it ment to be a free
NM software.
Let's get it straight. Let's compare - how many hours of work did you
invest in Linux (as OS, trademark, concept, etc.) and how many SuSE people
did? After you make the balance, think again if you have any
OH The wrong thing is that they are getting money for programs that
OH volunteers did _FOR FREE_, on their own time. instead of giving
OH the money for the volunteers I'm giving it to the company who
OH packed this and made some nice setup program ? no thanks. they
OH should release the d/l
OH SuSE employees are programming a bunch of software. What I said is, that
OH there are people such as Koshelev Maxim (Downloader for X's author)
OH who build programs at least as big as all the suse programs (yast + some
OH bash scripts. It's not a 'bunch' of software imo), and get _NOTHING_.
OH I heard from some people that the yast license is pretty 'sly' and some
OH bad things about it. I prefer GPL not because I want to see its source or
OH modify it (Although maybe it could be nice), but because I want to be free
OH to use it.
GPL has nothing to do with usage, and can not,
AS Your opinions are yours, of course, but I think you are
AS misrepresenting RMS here. He has always objected to limiting the use
AS of software. Consider his recent review of the new APSL (Apple Public
Well, so he's a hypocrite here. Because when it is regarding his software
(specifically
SS Well, now you know why it is better to pick 192.168.*.* for
SS private networks, even if you get to type more numbers :-)
Guess which address space will the second provider take? Bingo!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than
TC I'm not satisfied with this behaveiour. Can anybody think of a better
TC workaround? A space there is also not a good idea, because the hyphen here
TC is supposed to connected two words to one word.
That's like you would say "I want to use character '0' to mean both 0 and
1 and I still want
HBH Unfortunately, seems the BiDi standard doesn't treat the
HBH "makaf" properly, and Konqueror shows exactly as Mozilla the
HBH Makaf problem, which gives numbers as negative, and the same
HBH shows with fribidi and gedit..
There's no good solution to this problem, because this is not a bug -
EL which reminds me did anyone got galeon ( the gnome based
EL mozilla) to work better than the reqular mozilla?
I tried it, but found it's not worth the trouble. It has the same gecko
renderer from mozilla, so you earn nothing here. It's not so drastically
faster, and it lacks a lot of
AS Marc was offering you in his mail the use of his local Debian
AS mirror. You don't have to use it if you don't want, but
AS attacking him for this mail seems to me like an inappropriate
AS response.
We must recognise here that Marc was playing a deal of post-spinal
aperture in his messages,
MZ On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, "Stanislav Malyshev" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MZ This what amazes me most in the thing. Being unable to port Unix GUI,
MZ written on Motif (which is now even Open Source)
MZ
MZ Motif is not open source.
Ah. Open Motif is not Open Source (TM). But if you read
AS Ah. Open Motif is not Open Source (TM). But if you read explanations why
AS it isn't (http://www.opennc.org/openmotif/faq.html) you see that it's
AS irrelevant for Linux. So from what I gather, Open Motif on Linux meets the
AS Open Source criteria.
AS
AS It doesn't, because it can't be
NSRS 6. There is currently NO GUI for linux. Bare in mind that even on Solaris
NSRSthe advanced GUI uses Motif and the normal GUI is absolutely SHITTY.
This what amazes me most in the thing. Being unable to port Unix GUI,
written on Motif (which is now even Open Source), for years. Shows
TC BTW: the source was full of files with CR chars, which annoyed cpp on many
TC occasions, and thus had to be removed.
TC
TC crlf from fixDos ( http://e.co.za/marius/downloads/misc/ ) proved to be
TC very handy for the job.
Actually, I guess perl -npi.bak -e 's/\r\n$/\n/g' would do the trick
MZ For GPL, RMS is the copyright law.
MZ
MZ No it isn't. RMS has his legal counsel (a professor of law) issue his
MZ opinions. If you think you opinions of law are worth more, you're
MZ welcome to do whatever you want. I just think RMS's legal counsel
MZ is pretty sound. Is that a problem for
AS That is necessary for copyleft. If you could take Linux and release it
Sure. So be aware that any time you read "proprietary" in FSF texts, you
should read "non-GPL", since GPL restricts not only more strict licenses,
but also less strict. I understand why it's done, but let's be honest -
NH What kind of judge is going to make a decision against a company
NH when in a 100,000 line code, 50 lines "somehow distantly
NH resemble" code from a GPLed program? If the developer only looks
NH at the code, that's what going to happen - he won't suddenly
NH have 10,000 lines identical to a
AS The same copyright system that disallows you to copy ripped MP3s
AS disallows companies to make proprietary products out of GPLed
AS software. Our copyright system is just fine.
With our GPLed software the matter is pretty complicated. Generally, GPLed
software is referred to as a "free
AS That's a common misconception. It should have been obvious, but
AS somehow never is, that no amount of licensing trickery can make one
AS program be considered a derivative work of an unrelated program. And
See, this is an official position of RMS. I have quotes from him
personally saying
AB I can't even believe we're really discussing this lame subject
AB here. These lamo hacker wannabe kids questions don't belong on
AB this list.
You can discuss attack methods for two reasons - or you want to attack
someone, or you want to protect yourself.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/
AO 1. the computer on 192.168.1.78(example) is up
Nice. Most computers tend to be up when people are working.
AO 2. It can receive connection to the ICQ port
Wrong. Firewall won't let incoming connection in. It would only allow to
receive UDP packets inside "virtual circuit" created by
AO Even if the CEO does. Seen any company that the users don't hold mp3s
AO on their computers? It's illegal in the US and most startups are
AO registered in the US.
MP3 format is illegal in US? News for me. Is WAV going to be banned too?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels
T lets say i want to connect to an irc server with a spoofed ip, can
In most cases, you can't. Most cases of "IP spoofing on IRC" is really DNS
spoofing. Real IP spoofing over TCP is pretty hard to do, and if you want
to spoof more than one packet (i.e., maintain a real session), you need to
be
SB Those are I-lines.. not spoofing - hybrid has option to add an
SB I-line for spoofing.
I don't know about I-lines, etc. but I know pretty well DNS spoofing via
cache poisoning is possible - have done that myself. If you are
interested, just search "DNS cache poisoning" - there was a lot of
NH So what? Unless you have a completely-proxy-firewall (block
NH everything and allow only application proxies), whatever packets
NH you let through (be they http, ftp, or icq) carry the IP address
NH of the machine behind the firewall. But so what? If you use
I give you address of a machine
AO The ICQ protocol reveals the real IP of the computer running the client,
AO so even if you use GNU replacements it doesn't matter.
AO This "feature" opens a window for "crackers" to use various firewall
AO penetrating/piercing techniques.
If the computer is behind the firewall, most chances
S using ICQ remote attacker is able to make full port scan on networks behind
S the firewall.
How exactly one does that? Can you elaborate?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425/\
AO But if icq.com(example) got my packet and know my "secret" intranet
AO addresses
Oh, yeah, those defined in top-secret RFC1918? 10.1.1.1? 10.10.1.1?
192.168.1.1? 172.16.1.1? Am I l33t haxx0r already?
Guess how many pings is it going to take me to know each
internet-accessible address on your
IK there in the US. I wonder if we should start a major Bugzilla issue
IK and make everyone vote for it, or maybe just flood Bugzilla with
IK bugs such as "msn.co.il displays reversed" ?
I'm ready to vote for it twice a day :) That's realy _only_ thing why I
can't say "Mozilla is an usable
SF According to this kind of logic, MS would actually want their code to be
SF stolen. Let's get serious: if an open-source code implements something
No. The loss would be much greater than the benefit. But if it's _already_
stolen anyway, why not to use it?
SF a copyrighted code and use it for
AJ Apparantely, the Windows and MS Office source code was stolen (I'm not
AJ joking here).
AJ
AJ Take a look at MSNBC:
AJ http://www.msnbc.com/news/481927.asp
Actually, this is very bad news. Now nothing stops Microsoft lawyers from
twarting any compatibility effort not driven by Microsoft with
HBH Since most of Linux applications are open source - they cannot
HBH say it's stolen, cause if they'll say that - then they'll have
HBH to show their code and prove that it's the same...
Not at all. They will claim their IP was stolen and their code, obtained
by illegal means, was used in the
OH That's a new M$ advertisement in german, first one against Linux.
OH http://www.koehntopp.de/kris/msad.jpg
Anybody cares to translate what's actually written there?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone
OZ While IANAL, my understanding of the situation is that LGPL was designed
OZ exactly for such a situation.
More interesting question. Let's say we have some open source non-GPL
application, which uses LGPL-library.
1. Is such application legal?
2. Can LGPL library source be distibuted
SB No. slackware does not use rpm by default nor redhat scripts. slackware
SB uses simple .tgz packages, and simple BSD scripts. thats how linux should
SB be ;)
That's bull. Linux should have no packages and no scripts and no
slackware. If you need some software, you code it yourself or download
IS Lingua::IW::Logical. Actually more like semi-broken - in some
IS cases it works fine.
Actually, it worked fine in most cases, but since there's more
comprehensive implemntations, like FriBidi, I did not really find time to
fix it to be 100% good.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall
MS Some people may say Im wrong on this, but RH is getting awfully
MS M$ftish. The dumb-user-approach saying "you don't really need to
That's true. You don't _need_ to know. Information hiding is good, look at
your software design guides. You still _can_ know, if you care. But
average user is
TC And here I see:
TC [Formatting error: Internal base64 decoder error]
TC
TC I'm using pine 4.21. Marc is using netscape 4.75. This is not the first
TC time I can' read his messages sent to this list (although sometimes I
TC can).
That's because all Marc's mails get out in Base64, and mailing
AJ According to the docs, MySQL listens for outside connections.
AJ I'm going to use MySQL from the localhost, and I don't want it
AJ to bind to the eth interface. Is there a way to restrict it to
AJ the loopback interface?
In /etc/my.cnf:
[mysqld]
skip-networking
Prevents mysql from listening
OZ The real issue is not Shabbat/non-Shabbat, but Yom Kippur vs. Shabbat vs.
OZ non-Shabbat.
Now that you said that I know at least two people that would insist on
doing it on Yom Kippur because doing it any other day hurts their
feelings...
OZ There is no IGLU cabal. All former cabal members
OD I'm terribly sorry I had to interfer. I do not see why the code of
OD behivour of religious people is less "davka" than of a secular person. I
Because you and you comerades raiser a flamewar on the list (well, it
really was a flamefest, since observant people just said one short
phrase each),
MZ I'm happy you agree my preferences not to eat kosher should be respected.
This reminds me a history about two hilonim. One says to the second: "I go
to the restaurant N this evening" - "But this is a glatt kosher
restaurant!" - "Doesn't matter, I will eat only boiled eggs".
Sorry for the
HBH http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/12572.html
Quote:
Apparently, the fastest Internet connection you can currently find in
Israel is ISDN, "a measly 128 Kbps".
That's a lie. FR is available, and you can order FR more than 128K.
And no, Bezeq isn't to blame. Why didn't I hear a word
BM Because no one can supply high speed internet now, because of legal
BM problems.
I don't believe if the cables have started it back in 90's the issue won't
be resolved by now. But they started it when they felt satellites gonna
eat their market and they need to stop being oligopoly and start
GSM So how can I allow the remote login as root to those
GSM systems anyway?
GSM Why? To allow remote logon of root is to ask for trouble. Why not just
GSM su when needed. Or if you want to "do it right" install sudo.
Install ssh. Do ssh -l root myremotehost. Be happy secure.
--
[EMAIL
OM Yes, this is new distribution of Linux.
OM ESR had succeded in pursuading MS that Linux is popular Intel OS. In
OM addition to
OM features listed on site, MS-Linux will feature:
You forgot about Vigor - vi with Office paperclip.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
SS Suppose C++ has a great feature, which makes writing easily
SS maintainable code a brease, but is not in the "official" OO
SS specification. Obviously, C++ is not an OO language in that
SS respect, but who cares?
We can also suppose C++ hasn't some of features that are in "official" OO
n I wonder you didn't mention NetWorker product from Legato -
n www.legato.com , that has the biggest installed base Worldwide, as
n well as above 250 installations in Israel. The distributer of this
Was I looking very bad or Legato solutions doesn't support Linux?
At least, Networker has no
VV Something that is widely implemented and followed, perhaps?
You must mean Microsoft Office *ducks* *runs* *hides*
VV No, sadly. You?
ITYM "no, luckily". It isn't real flamewar unless it is over One True
Standard.
VV For some reason, I haven't saved the addresses of FUCKING
VV
IA I was once told that in Scheme (and IANASP) an "if" statement is an
IA object in itself. I'll be learning scheme next year and be able to tell
Well, I don't know what for, but OK - I can imagine language where sytax
constructs are objects. Even makes me curious. Good book on Scheme,
anyone?
IA Given enough time and resource - definitely. Having made entire DB
IA solution in pure Javascript (no, it wasn't fun), I'm firm in this.
IA
IA now THAT sounds impressive. does it parse XML too? do publish it in
IA OpenSource :-)
No, it didn't (though I guess I might do that too, in limited
MZ Let me clarify the muddy waters: in no language I'm aware of, is "if" an
MZ object. In most sane languages (Scheme, Python, Smalltalk), a boolean is
MZ an object. In smalltalk, a boolean has a method called ifTrue which
Ahh... that's boring. Just another way to write the same.
--
[EMAIL
IA OmerM started something...
IA
IA http://iglu.org.il:8080/Zen/SchemeBook
IA
No, I mean dead-tree book. The thing you can read while... let's say stuck
in traffic jam on Jabotinsky street. Something like the Camel (or maybe
the Llama) book.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be
n 2. Quick Link - Compatability Guides - Software Compatability Guide.
Well, not too obvious path... Also, word "client" hints that server on
Linux is non-existant? Then, it's not support. It's half-support. If I
have Linux server, I want to backup it on Linux, not install another NT
server.
n
SF From what I read in an article some time ago, Linux Torvalds was named
SF after the American Chemist Linus Pauling. But I heard from a different
SF source that he was named after the character Linus from the cartoon strip
SF "The Peanuts".
Why not after second Pope Linus then?
--
[EMAIL
BS I'm trying to find out if anyone actually uses linux as a company's VPN...
BS does it have the same functionality as Firewall-1 with VPN-1? (Checkpoint)
In fact, I'm interested in the thing too. Our needs are simple:
1. Firewall opening some set of ports to reach from outside and as
NM Took me two days to realize GNOME is not nearly as stable as KDE1 is.
NM While mostly, it works, various components (e.g., the help application)
NM crash repeatedly and sometimes restarting X seems like the only
NM option...
Seems you have bugs in your X installation. Never saw GNOME lock X,
AM Because they fixed so MANY holes, it isn't practical.
What isn't practical, sending CC of CVS diff fixing the hole to
maintainer of the tool? Or to bugtrack? Or publishing it on some page?
Gimme break.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\
RS Try out OpenBSD http://openbsd.org/security.html for size
RS (they claim Three years without a remote hole in the default install! Two
RS years without a localhost hole in the default install!)
What I don't like in OpenBSD is when someone discovers security hole they
pop up and say "we've
AJ What is it with these UPS failures in ISPs? How come American ISPs offer
AJ 99.9% uptime in hosting, while Israeli ISPs have a UPS failure evey few
Actually, 99.9% uptime means 8 hours down per year, or 1 hour down every
other month and then 2 hours to spare. And if UPS failure is corrected
AJ Such service that I could only wish for (or keep on dreaming)...
AJ
AJ [Just to make things clear: The price for a colocation in the US
AJ is the same if not lower than the cost here. It's just the
AJ service that's different].
In fact, I have a lot of positive experience with US services
GY Should it scare us? I don't know. Although they profess to have ported
GY "over 300 utilities and tools which behave exactly as they would on
GY other UNIX-based systems", I doubt they included that feature that
GY prevents the system from crashing every two hours.
If you run exactly the same
SR For the sake of discussion, here is an interesting article on
SR Open source security.
Well, I guess all those articles just say one thing people should know
from start: "There's no silver bullet". Like, no, Open Source is not
silver bullet either.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall
SHM NIS 30 is not too much if we were talking about a computer game, MS windows,
SHM or anything else.
SHM BUT, we are talking about linux, and teh most important thing in linux is
SHM the fact that it shouldn't cost money.
Oh, yeah? And then you would be insulted when someone says "Linux is for
IA As the people in Aduva, and possibly all Debian addicts will tell you,
IA "Kakha lo bonim khoma". Red Hat is a mishmash of packages which are too
Yeah. And if you ask Hapoel fans about how good Maccabi plays, you'd get
best opinion available :)
IA often badly coordinated with suboptimal
MZ Any real language (as opposed to glorified assemblers (C++) or macro
MZ processors (Tcl/bash)) has a built-in serialize and deserialize mechanism:
MZ Java (implements serializable)
MZ Python (pickle)
MZ Perl (Data::Dumper)
MZ Scheme (write)
BTW, there are language-independent serialization
IK Now, how my Linux manages to go into 2MB swap, with 160MB physical RAM,
IK 70MB of them in buffers is still a mystery to me ... yet another
IK optimization consideration? :)
Very simple. Unused processes are better in swap. Look how many mgetty's
you have? How ofter you use them? What about
NF 1) Why is memory usage so high when it shouldn't be?
NF Note: looking at the process that are running (most httpd), they don't
NF amount to much more that 30mb.
Actually, in ideal case memory usage should be 100%. Why you need memory
that isn't used? If it isn't used by the processes, OS
IA the problem is that many times the netscape process leaks over 200Meg of
IA swap, but it remains "used" once I kill the process. the RAM is freed,
IA but the machine is heavy as hell because it won't free up the swap and
IA swap back in all the other apps.
IA any idea how I force the machine
ST http://www.microsoft.com/typography/unicode/1255.htm
ST
ST It's not for iso8859-8, which I don't think has LRM and RLM, but
On my Unicode CD, there's no LRM and RLM in 8859-8. But that was 2.0 CD,
maybe there were changes since then...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels
EM Unicode and ISO-8859-8 are "competing" standards, so I wouldn't expect
EM Unicode to include 8859-8...
Er? So what that 8859-8.txt file on my Unicode CD really is?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone
EM Does anybody have any experience with this distro? Is it better/safer
EM to install and use the latest version of it in comparison with the
EM original RH6.2?
I Installed 6.0 from KRUD, IIRC. The same as RH only some RPMS are updated
(from RH updates, I guess) and some are added (don't
DM http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
Ah, I know. They decided to copy glaring success of Mozilla project.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425/\ JRRT LotR.
VV Mount a filesystem via NFS and patch the kernel on the NFS server
VV to serve different signatures on that inode.
signaturefs anyone? With hierarchical signature namespace (you do want
different signatures for different outgoing lists?), signature attributes,
etc., etc.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gk 2. from my experience, KDE works more stable then gnome does (it is too
gkcommon for gnome applets to get the gnome panel stuck). since
gkenlightenment also didn't manage to work on my PC - i gave up on gnome.
Never saw both effects. I've seen occasionally GNOME apps crash
(ohmygawd,
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
