--- Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to do something that is admittedly a bit
foolish. I'm trying to
get the sendmail RPM from Redhat-7.3 working on my
ancient Caldera box.
There's really not much Caldera left in it, as I've
been upgrading it
piecemeal to assorted Redhat
I'm trying to do something that is admittedly a bit foolish. I'm trying to
get the sendmail RPM from Redhat-7.3 working on my ancient Caldera box.
There's really not much Caldera left in it, as I've been upgrading it
piecemeal to assorted Redhat RPMs for a while now, but it was last
simple.
Joel
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:35:33PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
I'm trying to do something that is admittedly a bit foolish. I'm trying to
get the sendmail RPM from Redhat-7.3 working on my ancient Caldera box.
There's really not much Caldera left in it, as I've been upgrading
On 11/19/03 19:59, Joel Hammer wrote:
The old script was called mta. What if you try that instead?
# /etc/init.d/mta start
WARNING: Mail Transfer Agent sendmail selected but not installed.
Sure, i could debug where it expects sendmail to be, but i'm feeling lazy :)
Or, just write your own script
I upgraded from clamav-0.60 to clamav-0.65. When I tried the
clamav-milter using `cat test1 | mail root`, I sae these entries in
/var/log/mail
Nov 15 13:33:27 server sendmail[31734]: hAF5XRdP031734: hAF5XRdQ031734:
DSN: User unknown
Nov 15 13:33:27 server sendmail[31714]: hAF5XP2h031714: Losing
i have set FEATURE(relay_unresolvable_domains) in my config.mc.
why I still got the following error when I tried email as root from my
local domain which is not registered?
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
(reason: 553 5.1.8 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Domain of
and restart
sendmail for this feature to work. If this is the only local address
you'll be using, disable the FEATURE from your .mc file, you'll be
running a much more secure system. In general,
relay_unresolvable_domains is not a good config option to enable on any
box connected to the Wild Woolly
step 7.Build the sendmail daemon
# cd sendmail
# if [ ! -e /usr/share/man ] ; then ln -s /usr/man /usr/share/man; fi
# sh Build -f /etc/mail/site.config.m4 sh Build install
* you should see '-DMILTER' periodically during the compile
step 10.The supporting tools are now built and installed
* cd
Hi
We are using sendmail-8.10.2-C1 in our cobalt raq-4r server. For few
of our domains, if we don't use the full domain name in the /etc/mail/access
file then it is coming *relay deny*. Where as for all our domaina we are
mentioning the ip address in the relay and it is working fine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Swapana Ghosh wrote:
| Hi
|
|We are using sendmail-8.10.2-C1 in our cobalt raq-4r server.
For few
| of our domains, if we don't use the full domain name in the
/etc/mail/access
| file then it is coming *relay deny*. Where as for all our
A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: Sendmail
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Title: Jeffrey People Stationery
Are their tools
available to move the content of sendmail to exchange?
Jeffrey People
Albany State University
Information Technology
Systems Engineer
229-430-1764
vti_encoding:SR|utf8-nl
vti_timelastmodified:TR|29 Nov 2001 20:34:04 -
vti_author:SR|jpeople
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Jeffrey People wrote:
Jeffrey People StationeryAre their tools available to move the content of
sendmail to exchange?
for the love of all that is pure, why would you want to move to exchange
from sendmail? got alot of hardware money to waste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey People wrote:
| Jeffrey People StationeryAre their tools available to move the content of
| sendmail to exchange?
|
| Jeffrey People
| Albany State University
| Information Technology
| Systems Engineer
| 229-430-1764
|
I'm not quite sure what
Net Llama! wrote:
for the love of all that is pure, why would you want to move to exchange
from sendmail? got alot of hardware money to waste??
Well said. Exchange must surely be the worst piece of software ever
crafted by human hands. Even other stuff from MS looks pristine by
comparison
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:22:10 -0400
Jeffrey People [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey People StationeryAre their tools available to move the content
of sendmail to exchange?
ROFLMAO! I've heard of folks moving from sendmail to postfix, qmail, or
exim (though I'm not real sure why), but most move
]
Subject: Related to sendmail gethostbyaddr error
Hi
Two days back I asked a question about the sendmail
gethostbyaddr
errors..
Our server is Cobalt raq4r. On this server the sendmail
is running.. Now
in this server bind was running and all the domains' entries
Hi
No i have not touched anything in the mailserver. Could you please guide
me how to point the mailserver to the new DNS server... This is the cobalt
server so i generally don't touch the sendmail.cf file... Anyway it will be
helpful if you say me how i will pointed sendmail to check
... Anyway it
will be
helpful if you say me how i will pointed sendmail to check the reverse
PTR
where the new nameserver is looking into
I have checked the resolv.conf file the first entry is showing the
server
ip address. Where as the new nameservr has the ip addresses of the
provider
Hi
Two days back I asked a question about the sendmail gethostbyaddr
errors..
Our server is Cobalt raq4r. On this server the sendmail is running.. Now
in this server bind was running and all the domains' entries with their PTRs
were present under the bind configuration.
Now very
Hi
What kind of HDs?
I can only say the speed that is 100MB/sec approx.
Bandwith and other it is with the company who are
holding our DNS etc...
That doesn't answer the question of what kind of
harddrives you have.
Sorry I did not mean about hard drives . I mentioned
for bandwith etc.
Hi Andrew
Unless defined by the ConnectionRateThrottle,
MaxDaemonChildren,
DelayLA, or RefuseLA parameters, it's limited by
bandwidth, disk I/O,
.memory, processors, and numerous other variables.
The -d44.4 flag when
in testing mode will show the open file attempts,
which is a beginning
.to
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
Hi
What kind of HDs?
I can only say the speed that is 100MB/sec approx.
Bandwith and other it is with the company who are
holding our DNS etc...
That doesn't answer the question of what kind of
harddrives you have.
Sorry I did not mean
. It
is taking almost 4 hrs, including receiving and
clearing the mails
This is not the question - i am concerned only when
sendmail is receiving the mailvand *sendmail*
*procmail* processing are going on, the load is going
upto 20..vand it is varying from 20 to 25...
So what are the parameters I
Hi
What kind of HDs?
I can only say the speed that is 100MB/sec approx.
Bandwith and other it is with the company who are
holding our DNS etc...
I have posted another email.. I want to know how many
connections
sendmail can accept... Becaues i am testing with 250k
recrods and
want to send
.. I want to know how many
connections
sendmail can accept... Becaues i am testing with 250k
recrods and
want to send from qmail server to sendmail server
(just to check
the qmail speed)...
I checked with 50k records. i am seeing that first 10k
records are
coming in a speed that i expected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Swapana Ghosh wrote:
| Hi
|
| I want to check - how many connections our
| Sendmail can accept and handle...
| Which is the parameter will tell this?
|
| Regards.
| -Swapna
|
|
Unless defined by the ConnectionRateThrottle, MaxDaemonChildren
This is the sendmail macro config file. If
you make changes to this file,
3 dnl you need the sendmail-cf rpm installed and
then have to generate a
4 dnl new /etc/mail/sendmail.cf by running the
following command:
5 dnl
6 dnlm4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc
/etc/mail
Hi Andrew
Thanks a lot
I waited almost 1 hr just to see if my luck
favours. But i found that after more than an hr mail
started to generate from the queue and finally all
mails have been sent...
Best Regards.
-Swapna
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC
Hi
When i am processing 10,000 subscribers for the
mailing list testing, then the records took 15 mints
to clear the qmail queue and after 15 mints i checked
that all the records came to sendmail queue and then
it started for clearing the queue.
But when the same testing i did
How much memory does this box have? What kind of HDs? What's the load
like when its taking an hour to send mail? Which version of sendmail?
Which kernel version? What kind of network connection do you have (type
speed)?
On 06/14/03 18:54, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
Hi
When i am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Swapana Ghosh wrote:
| Hi
|
| When i am processing 10,000 subscribers for the
| mailing list testing, then the records took 15 mints
| to clear the qmail queue and after 15 mints i checked
| that all the records came to sendmail queue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Mathews wrote:
snip
| Change the QUEUE to something like 5m to process it once a minute. This
| is extreme, so use it at your own risk.
snip
Typo. 5m is every 5 minutes, not once a minute. Sorry.
#cd /pub
#more beer
- --
Andrew Mathews
-
:75752 kB
What kind of HDs? What's the load
like when its taking an hour to send mail?
Load is varying 15 - 22 ...in this server only i am
running sendmail
NO other processing is going on.
Which version of sendmail?
sendmail-8.12.5-7
Which kernel version?
kernel-2.4.18-14
On 06/14/03 20:55, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
What kind of HDs? What's the load
What kind of HDs?
like when its taking an hour to send mail?
Load is varying 15 - 22 ...in this server only i am
running sendmail
NO other processing is going on.
Something is not right if the load is that high.
What
.
| -Swapna
Few days back I asked few questions to you about
sendmail. Regarding futher I am testing one mailing
list under Ecartis mailing manger which is installed
at one server where MTA is qmail.
I have to test this list with 2.5laks data. I took one
server where sendmail is installed
',`smtp.your.provider')
||
||
|| Where i need to mention this line?
||
|| Thanks and regards.
|| -Swapna
|
|
| Few days back I asked few questions to you about
| sendmail. Regarding futher I am testing one mailing
| list under Ecartis mailing manger which is installed
| at one server where MTA is qmail.
|
| I have
Could you tell me where I will mention in the
senmdail.cf file these parameters...
One more thing i noticed that after receiving the mail
sendmail also taking time to clear its queue - i need
to clear the queue also quickly...
Thanks a lot again
Best Regards.
-Swapna
or processing delays.
| One more thing i noticed that after receiving the mail
| sendmail also taking time to clear its queue - i need
| to clear the queue also quickly...
This could be caused by a single message blocking the processing of the
rest. You can get around this by adding confQueueSortOrder=random
it as necessary after retesting.
I have added confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE entry in
the senndmail.mc file and increased
upto 40 - but still to test 1000 records 6-7 times MTA
is rejecting the connections
due to high load. here is
the error messages
406 Jun 13 11:58:19 nasik sendmail[4620
Hi Andrew
Here is my sendmail.mc file - i am sending because
if i missed anything to explain you
divert(-1)
include(`/home/swapna/sendtest/m4/cf.m4')
VERSIONID(`linux setup for Red Hat Linux')dnl
OSTYPE(`linux')
On 06/13/03 12:22, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
In my sendmail.mc my file i did not find the above
parameters settings - pl. advice
me how to set it...
He already did. He also asked you to post your sendmail.mc so that we
can figure out what you've got.
--
On Friday 13 June 2003 03:41 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
On 06/13/03 12:22, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
In my sendmail.mc my file i did not find the above
parameters settings - pl. advice
me how to set it...
He already did. He also asked you to post your sendmail.mc so that we
can figure out what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Swapana Ghosh wrote:
| Hi Andrew
|
|Here is my sendmail.mc file - i am sending because
| if i missed anything to explain you
|
| divert(-1)
|
| include(`/home/swapna/sendtest/m4/cf.m4')
| VERSIONID(`linux setup for Red
--
Doug Hunley
ODJFS DNS/Linux/Unix Admin
These 3 guys walk into a bar. You'd think
one of them would have ducked
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SANS Alert 2003-03-03
Critical vulnerability in all versions of SENDMAIL
Plus a Snort Vulnerability
On 3/4/2003 7:10 AM, someone claiming to be DOUGLAS HUNLEY wrote:
snip sendmail vulnerability stuff
Hmmm...
This notice says that sendmail version 8.12.8 is vulnerable, at least
that's how I read Sendmail versions 5.2 up to 8.12.8 are known to be
vulnerable at this time. Then goes on to imply
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
FWIW, the RHN updated my 8.0 box to rpm version sendmail-8.12.8-1.80 and
patched my 7.0 box's version to rpm version sendmail-8.11.6-23.70.
Yea, but i suspect that RH is pulling a Caldera, and backporting patches
to older versions, rather than releasing
587
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 22:08:21 -0500 - Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: sendmail port question
I know that sendmail listens on port 25. But, when I send email, with
sendmail, which port does sendmail use to make the connection to the
mail server? I don't have the F=R flag
See the section in /etc/sendmail.cf as follows:
# Smart relay host (may be null)
DSmail.yourisp.com
Set to your ISP's mail server name, and sendmail should try to forward
thru it.
Thanks,
This works. Although, the proper prefix was smtp for comcast.net.
Joel
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003
Back at the office and time to get back to the pending sendmail question,
I have done all except the sendmail.cf rules. I was looking
at those, and decided it was going to be one language too much. As in, my
brain began to hurt. I will see what you have suggested below and see if it
helps. Thanks
falls into that range, you're hosed. That's
the way my mail is. The RBL I use is called Dialups.relays.OsiruSoft.com, among
others.
look into an SMTP relay and point your Sendmail server to forward all mail through it
(Webmin makes this easy, but there are a couple other ways)
On Thu, 30 Jan
On 01/30/2003 01:35 AM, ronnie gauthier wrote:
If comcast allows what you are doing it may be as simple as asking them to put
you into their reverse lookup table.
This is one option, but if it is a typical cable ISP, it's not likely to
happen.
I am on comcast cable. I run sendmail
.
This is one option, but if it is a typical cable ISP, it's not likely to
happen.
I am on comcast cable. I run sendmail to directly send mail to my
recipients.
Of late, some sites, eg. aol.com, are rejecting my mail, telling me I
should be using my isp's mail server.
Comcast can
into their reverse lookup table.
This is one option, but if it is a typical cable ISP, it's not likely to
happen.
I am on comcast cable. I run sendmail to directly send mail to my
recipients.
Of late, some sites, eg. aol.com, are rejecting my mail, telling me I
should be using my
:
If comcast allows what you are doing it may be as simple as asking them to put
you into their reverse lookup table.
This is one option, but if it is a typical cable ISP, it's not likely to
happen.
I am on comcast cable. I run sendmail to directly send mail to my
recipients
If comcast allows what you are doing it may be as simple as asking them to put
you into their reverse lookup table.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:01:29 -0500 - Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Sendmail: Proxy server or whatever
I am on comcast cable. I run sendmail to directly
(Hacked out of a message from my Sendmail guru)
relay-domains
mydomain.com
local-host-names
mydomain.com
virtusertable
@mydomain.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendmail Hack
Just a thought.
I assume the internal machine runs sendmail or some other mail program.
Why not program the internal machine to forward the mail?
Joel
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org
I have just moved a mail server to use sendmail (Caldera 3.1.1).
The machine 'should' forward all mail for a specific domain to an internal
machine. OK. So I set up the mailertable to make this happen. That works.
BTW, none of the users should have have an account on this sendmail box.
Now, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DOUGLAS HUNLEY spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
anyone got any experience or docs or pointers to docs showing how to
configure sendmail to require a valid id and password before you can SMTP
through it? I'm *not* talking about POP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerry Doris spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
1. sendmail no longer runs as root. The result is that it can no longer
access the /etc/sasldb file where the sasl username/passwords are stored
(this is needed if you're going to enable
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerry Doris spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
1. sendmail no longer runs as root. The result is that it can no longer
access the /etc/sasldb file where the sasl username/passwords
anyone got any experience or docs or pointers to docs showing how to configure
sendmail to require a valid id and password before you can SMTP through it? I'm *not*
talking about POP before SMTP. I'm talking about 'my server requires authentication
before I can send mail' ..
thanks
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, DOUGLAS HUNLEY wrote:
anyone got any experience or docs or pointers to docs showing how to configure
sendmail to require a valid id and password before you can SMTP through it? I'm *not*
talking about POP before SMTP. I'm talking about 'my server requires authentication
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, DOUGLAS HUNLEY wrote:
anyone got any experience or docs or pointers to docs showing how to configure
sendmail to require a valid id and password before you can SMTP through it? I'm *not*
talking about POP before SMTP. I'm talking about 'my server requires authentication
by default, does sendmail accept email address with non-printable
characters (8-bit characters)?
if not, could I set sendmail.cf (or better, m4 run from config.mc) to
accept them?
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux We Trust.
news://news.hkpcug.org/ v \ http://www.linux
*** Culprit: sendmail-8.12.5-7 on RH 8.0 but probably me instead.
Problem: Make sendmail put my mail in queue when I'm not on the network
and send it when I'm back home.
Client: Pine 4.44... :-)
I use a very basic sendmail.cf file and send all mail to my hub at home
which does the rest. I'm
with sendmail to
use the old (deprecated) location
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org
Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the Special Olympics. Even if
you win
I have an incoming alias in sendmail so that mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets
sent to my local username's mailbox (dad) using /etc/mail/genericstable.
Unfortunately, it seems that mail sent locally doesn't follow the alias. If I
my wife sends mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it doesn't go. If she sends
Should be, that and runing newaliases afterwards (im most certain but its
been awhile since I ran sendmail)
Bill Day
Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586
7:10pm up 10:11, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
We're still up at irc.openprojects.net @ #linux-users
or irc.freenode.net @ #linux-users
http
and make sure that you are using the right aliases file
is it /etc/aliases or /etc/mail/aliases?
Bill Day wrote:
Should be, that and runing newaliases afterwards (im most certain but its
been awhile since I ran sendmail)
I'm using sendmail that came with RH 8, 8.12.5, and kmail 1.4.3 (KDE
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:25:28PM -0500, Tim Wunder wrote:
I have an incoming alias in sendmail so that mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets
sent to my local username's mailbox (dad) using /etc/mail/genericstable.
Unfortunately, it seems that mail sent locally doesn't follow the alias. If I
my
/mail/aliases?
Bill Day wrote:
Should be, that and runing newaliases afterwards (im most certain but its
been awhile since I ran sendmail)
I'm using sendmail that came with RH 8, 8.12.5, and kmail 1.4.3 (KDE
3.0.5).
Is it as simple as setting up the alias in /etc/aliases?
--
RedHat
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 06:39 pm, someone claiming to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:25:28PM -0500, Tim Wunder wrote:
I have an incoming alias in sendmail so that mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gets sent to my local username's mailbox (dad) using
/etc/mail
hmm.. this one is what i needdd when I need to use my ISP's smtp as
smart relay for my local sendmail. some ISP's smtp checks the sender
names for existing domains if not the username.
thanks.
Well, genericstable is for mapping outgoing usernames to the e-mail address so
that mail that I send
I cannot be sure. should be these ones.
/var/log/mail
Oct 21 00:30:17 server sendmail[906]: g9KGUAlZ000906:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], delay=00:00:07, xdelay=00:00:06, mailer=esmtp,
pri=39556, relay=homemail.doregi.com. [203.233.237.24], dsn=5.7.1,
stat=User unknown
Oct 21 00:30:18 server sendmail
the full message header:
From - Mon Oct 21 00:46:47 2002
X-UIDL: 3db2dd240002
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 1000
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by server.donkeyware.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) id g9KGUAla000906;
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:30:18 +0800
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:30:18
thes signature. look like somthing tricky...
--g9KGUAlZ000906.1035131410/server.donkeyware.org--
--g9KGUAla000906.1035131418/server.donkeyware.org--
m.w.chang wrote:
is it someone trying to use my smtp as a relay but failed?
but how did it trigger my sendmail to do the job? I didn't reply
That would be good. I'd also like to see the Sendmail logs (in COL this
is located in /var/log/mail). I assume this is where the original post
data came from.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:57:28 +0800
m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could post the whole message header tonight. it's quite a long
This is the header of the notification message to postmaster.
I'm more interested in the log messages as they appear in syslog.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:43:55 +0800
m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the full message header:
From - Mon Oct 21 00:46:47 2002
X-UIDL: 3db2dd240002
during the procmail stage...
yes, I followed advices to allow only localhost and my own subnet in
/etc/mail/access.
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
Someone was trying out your MTA as an open relay, and sendmail blocked
it correctly :)
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we
I could post the whole message header tonight. it's quite a long one...
Matthew Carpenter wrote:
Could you include more of the logs?
but I don't understand how it get to my smtp. I fetchmail messages from
that cityu pop, which would be procmail into my mbox. It seems that the
attempt to relay
yes, I opened port 25 while keeping an eye on the /var/log/mail for
invalid relay errors (my sendmail relay only localhost and internal
network). I want to appreciate the amount of attack from spammers. :)
also, I want to learn using sendmail to receive messages.
Double check your firewall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 02:33:12 -0400
begin Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
[snip]
sendmail has to either be the final recipient or a relay for it.
[snip]
If these two assumptions are correct, as well as what you said about
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:25:57 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I seen no clean way to do this. Your problem is:
foo.org IN MX 5 mail.foo.org
you can't tell mail servers some mail for users at foo.org goes to one
box, and some goes to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This one has me stumped, hopefully one of you gurus can figure it out. Here at
work, we are trying to implement a sendmail test system to prove its
capabilities to mgmt. We are going to be allowed to have a small group of
specify email addresses
On Friday 18 October 2002 10:07 am, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
This one has me stumped, hopefully one of you gurus can figure it out. Here
at work, we are trying to implement a sendmail test system to prove its
capabilities to mgmt. We are going to be allowed to have a small group of
specify
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This one has me stumped, hopefully one of you gurus can figure it out.
Here at work, we are trying to implement a sendmail test system to
prove its capabilities to mgmt. We are going to be allowed to have a
small group of specify email
The only problem I see with that is that effectively EVERYONE's mail gets
routed through the sendmail system. Which will presumably be a cast-off
box scrounged together for the test. If it dies, then everyone's mail is
killed--not good for the demo.
What about using fetchmail to pull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 18 October 2002 10:07 am, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
How about using procmail to grep a list of names if the name is not
found, the email gets forwarded to the other server.
that would work, except that I'm trying to sell mgmt on using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Biggerstaff spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
The only problem I see with that is that effectively EVERYONE's mail gets
routed through the sendmail system. Which will presumably be a cast-off
box scrounged together
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerry Doris spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
Perhaps I'm missing something but I think you should be looking at
virtusertable.
I'm assuming that all mail is going to come through the linux sendmail
box. I believe you can forward
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sorry Bruce. I hit the wrong button and ended up redirecting instead of
replying. my bad
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerry Doris spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
Perhaps I'm missing something but I think you should be looking at
virtusertable.
I'm assuming that all mail is going to come through the linux sendmail
box. I believe you can
I typically will use SMTPClient (fm:smtpclient) in these situations. It
allows more control than mail and one option is to tell it which SMTP
server to use. It does NOT require sendmail and you can point it directly
at your SMTP server inside. This, along with the fact that you can
specify
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:14:19 -0400, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
Instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED], you can get email messages from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or something to that extent.
oo. I like this I'll take a look. Thanks Matt!
___
Linux-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
The site.config.m4 can be placed in /etc/mail rather than in that
special devtools/Site directory. Just build your sendmail by:
sh Build -c -f /etc/mail/site.config.m4
neat trick. I'll
ok. but I really need someone to verify my procedure. my write-up will
cover teh compilation of cyrus-sasl-1.5.28 froms source as well.
I wish I could get 2.1.7 working
a _lot_ of people use smrsh (for majordomo, mailman, etc), so it should
probaly stay in. just my opinion. write up the
Mr. Hunley, I have finally built sendmail-8.12.6 from source with
-DMILTER and -DSASL=10528. I also compiled my own cyrus-sasl-1.5.28 from
source (I had no lock with sasl-2.1.7 though, when the newer version
needed to work with berkeley db which until now I didn't understand). I
am still
hmm... is there an easy way to check whether the miler is ready?
I want to skip smrsh and go directly to your article on anti-virus and
spam filter.
ok, I will skip the sasl first since smailauth.html didn't cover every
thing (not from source as you need -DSASL to compile sendmail).
I just
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
