On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
Beer good.
Beer Foamy.
Only when you add bubble bath...
L.
A young, female, non-bearded, non-jumpered members of CAMRA? *shock*
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:09:16PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just
From: Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
Great idea to tie it in to a success story I
From: Lucy McWilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beer good.
But Guinness is better ;)
Barbie
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:41:56PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
In other news: Microsoft SQL Server sucking (SQueaL), Sun Ultra
Enterprise 1, google++, the Sony Clie being small and cute,
checking out pubs for the next meet, buffy, search.cpan.org being
hacked (Catalog module apparently),
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:57:08PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just give it away or hoard it, y'know?
There
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:57:08PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they
I have managed to resist the temptation to join previous flame wars with bk
but I was feeling weak this time :(
Matt
--
s!msfQ!s$utvKs(Q)\1!sfiupoBs^reverse Ibdlfses^#
s$#!uojsqs(.)chr(ord($1)-1)ges(.*)reverse $1see
- Original Message -
From: Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to the
amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if they
said they designed it. But I'll agree with The Goth here, do we really want
to associate with the buggers?
From: Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to
the
amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if
they
said they designed it. But I'll agree with The Goth here, do we
Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 1:16:12 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
DC On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:55:17PM -0500, Mike Jarvis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Larry speaks in a bit over 9 hours. Yippee!
DC Actually - he doesn't :)
DC http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/12/2255236
It all worked out ok.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Barbie [easynet] wrote:
From: Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to
the
amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if
they
said they
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:44:11AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Are there any of you lot still looking for jobs?
Still open? I think I might have someone for you.
I was fishing on behalf of a client who may well need a perl linux
person in the
From: Robin Szemeti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 June 2001 03:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: downloady filenames
ISTR somebody explaing the magic incantations you could put after
Content-type: text/some-funny-application
in order for the browser to try and save it as
From: Chris Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Why, when the sun is shining (almost) and there is a popular (?) govt.
do I feel like I did in early/mid 70's: like the end of the
world was nigh?
Hmm, not sure... but is the feeling helped buy having someone in the White
House who has no real
From: Paul Makepeace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
PS -- that is one truly obnoxiously big sig.
I apologise profusely for my employers lawyers need to avoid any form of
litigation due to something that I may or may not say to the right or wrong
person while sending an email which may or may not
This in the Opera (browser) Newsletter I received yesterday:
* Opera challenges UK govt to support standards *
The British government's prestigious gateway
Robert Thompson wrote:
I apologise profusely
Sorry, you'll have to give me a hardcopy version of that before I'll believe
you:
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Robert Thompson wrote:
From: Robin Szemeti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 June 2001 03:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: downloady filenames
ISTR somebody explaing the magic incantations you could put after
Content-type: text/some-funny-application
On or about Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:10:32AM +0100, Robin Szemeti typed:
someone somewhere a few weeks ago posted something about an extra line
you could put not dissimilar to 'Apparent-filename: something.xyz' .. its
not so much a mime types thing but a browser thing ..
Content-Disposition.
R
This seemed to work.
print Content-type:application/whatever\n.Content-Disposition:
attachment; filename=$file\n\n
Thanks
Jon
*
Jon Galliers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmer Perl/C++/MySQL/DB2/Java
Design Net http://www.design.net.uk
Isn't there some cough/ perl module that might allow us to rig a
sig-stripper to be installed at dircon? Where sig = any trailer that has
more than four un-para'ed lines. Or give these people a damn shell
account. Or SOMETHING.
(Actually I don't really care I just got carried away with the
* at 11/06 21:38 +0100 Robin Szemeti said:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Chris Benson wrote:
Didn't ukonline.co.uk complain about trademark infringement a while back?
Is gateway.gov.uk the result? and is there any possible trademark confusion
with this address?
ring ring
'hello .. is
Dominic Mitchell sent the following bits through the ether:
I think the python scheme of creating a bytecode file on the first run
is better, but I'm not sure how amenable perl's code tree is to being
flattened and restored (this may be why we haven't seen a perl-java
compiler).
ByteCache -
Dominic Mitchell wrote:
And you'd have to make the daemon threaded, or end up running multiple
pre-forking daemons to do the job. At which point, you're only saving
the fork time and the parse time, which depending on how much effort it
is to complete the above, may not be much of a saving
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:31:44AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dominic Mitchell wrote:
And you'd have to make the daemon threaded, or end up running multiple
pre-forking daemons to do the job. At which point, you're only saving
the fork time and the parse time, which depending on how
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:14:41 +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:34:28PM +0100, Peter Haworth
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can someone please remind me about the technical meeting on the 21st? Now
that it looks like I might be in London at the time, I find I've deleted
all
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night,
I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your
passport, we'll even let you south of the river and my sofa is very
comfortable and has a well-stocked
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night,
I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your
passport, we'll even let you south
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night,
I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your
passport, we'll even let you south
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:40:44PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night,
I'm sure we can collectively find a way
Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
It's a TRAP!
You been playing wy too much nethack recently.
That was a tough level with comfy sofa and the drinks cabinet.
--
Dave Hodgkinson,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:26:08 +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:14:41 +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
Well, er..., there will be a meeting on the 21st. I spoke to Alex last
night and he said we could hold it at
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 05:18:43PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
It's a TRAP!
You been playing wy too much nethack recently.
That was a tough level with comfy sofa and
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:57:51AM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote:
I see that registration for YAPC::Europe has opened.
http://www.yapc.org/Europe/registration.html
They've also accepted both my Perl for the People and Creating Data
Output Files Using the Template Toolkit talks :)
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:41:48PM +0100, Neil Ford wrote:
So who's registered then? ;-)
I have, now to write[0] the talks.
[0] always with the writing!
--
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:15:36AM +0100, Robert Thompson wrote:
From: Chris Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Why, when the sun is shining (almost) and there is a popular (?) govt.
do I feel like I did in early/mid 70's: like the end of the
world was nigh?
Hmm, not sure... but is
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jon Galliers wrote:
This seemed to work.
print Content-type:application/whatever\n.Content-Disposition:
attachment; filename=$file\n\n
yadda! .. thats the cookie! ..
a thousand thanks ;)
right I can stop my cvs files coming up as .'something.pl' now ...
ta muchly.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:55:38PM +0100, Chris Benson wrote:
Oh yes, I vaguely thought on reading about the floods in The South
that maybe this was supposed to be a message like Repent your sins or
I wash you off the face of the Earth.
I think it's more along the lines of the Creator(s)
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:41:48PM +0100, Neil Ford wrote:
So who's registered then? ;-)
I have, now to write[0] the talks.
I got lucky. They didn't want the Perl Proverbs talk (which I'd have
to write), but they did want 12 step (which I busk).
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Simon Wistow wrote:
Somebody tell me why this is a stupid idea because I can't think of any
obvious reason but if there wasn't then I'm sure sombody would have
already done it [0] ...
Similar principle to mod_perl, a perl script is run but instead of a
normal
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:54:01PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
is this anything like wot FastCGI does .. or is that summat different?
Since 'this' is a bit muddy I couldn't say, though I do know that
FastCGI works as a constantly running coprocess, so maybe
--
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got lucky. They didn't want the Perl Proverbs talk (which I'd have
to write), but they did want 12 step (which I busk). Result.
Busk... What a wonderful turn of phrase ;)
There's a couple of reasonable hex editors out there, but I usually just
tend to use M-x hexl-find-file in emacs. If you're a vim user, see
xxd(1).
or bvi (Binary vi)
Robin Szemeti [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*
* What IS the mentality of idiots who attack community sites
* like this?
*
*maybe it was just a script kiddie .. maybe it was a worm.
It wasn't anything quite so dignified. I had reinstalled the Catalog
module last month after a failed attempt to
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Chris Benson wrote:
I know a state-of-emergency (or whatever) has been called
to right it has, as I understand it this means now that you are supposed
to drive a 5.3L V8 rather than the 7.1L V8 unless absolutlely necessary
...
oops .. read 358cubic inch and 427ci ... these
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
And, as far as the idiots go, I doubt there are any fewer today then there
were yesterday.
well .. my theory is:
they say 'theres one born every minute'.. but sometimes, due to
oversight, there isn't one born for a whole hour or so, so they
Tuesday, June 12, 2001, 2:55:38 PM, Chris Benson wrote:
CB On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:15:36AM +0100, Robert Thompson wrote:
From: Chris Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Why, when the sun is shining (almost) and there is a popular (?) govt.
do I feel like I did in early/mid 70's: like
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:55:17PM -0500, Mike Jarvis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Larry speaks in a bit over 9 hours. Yippee!
Actually - he doesn't :)
http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/12/2255236
Dave...
--
Drugs are just bad m'kay
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:10:28PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
Tuesday, June 12, 2001, 2:55:38 PM, Chris Benson wrote:
CB I wash you off the face of the Earth. If so it missed Washington DC
CB by about a 1,000 miles and Texas by 500. It probably missed GWB by a
CB couple of light years.
At 00:23 09/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
Jonathan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A reasonably reliable headhunter I've dealt with in the past is
looking for technical project managers for new web company. Let me
know if interested...
Hmm... I wonder if I could morph...
Come over to the
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Anyone got a link to this?
There's a working version of it here:
http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/
And the thing that drives it (The Dada Engine) here:
http://dev.null.org/dadaengine/
Alex Gough
--
The Texan turned out to be good-natured,
At 18:51 09/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
Monday morning
Precisely. And using Java et al is a discrimination against the mobility
impaired.
Not to mention the way it discriminates totally against people who can't
afford, don't have, morally object to, are too old to learn to use,
computers.
Sure,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:56:19AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
At 18:51 09/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
Monday morning
Precisely. And using Java et al is a discrimination against the mobility
impaired.
Not to mention the way it discriminates totally against people who can't
afford,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 05:40:38PM +0100, Matthew Robinson wrote:
Apologies in advance if I have missed something blindingly obvious :)
I need to change the default library paths in a compiled copy of perl.
Basically, I want to move /usr/lib/perl5 into /usr/local/lib/perl5. I am
unable to
From: Jonathan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not to mention the way it discriminates totally against people who can't
afford, don't have, morally object to, are too old to learn to use,
computers.
How come. It's an alternative to, not a replacement for, the usual paper
based forms; isn't it?
On 08/06/2001 at 12:30 +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
... and some not so pretty pictures.
http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/london.pm/2001-06-07/
Bah. Too many of me. And not enough of you here:
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
Warning: dislike of flash may lead to fuzzyness and light trails.
--
::
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 08/06/2001 at 12:30 +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
... and some not so pretty pictures.
http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/london.pm/2001-06-07/
Bah. Too many of me. And not enough of you here:
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
Warning: dislike of flash
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:19:21AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:56:19AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
I haven't looked at the certificate issue, but most of the things I've
read so far state that it's only a problem because they've made it a
problem by using
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
Warning: dislike of flash may lead to fuzzyness and light trails.
Very artistic. I think your camera was drunk (thank $deity - I don't get
on with them sober). Nice to meet you all. I'll be ba-ack.
L.
I love the smell of fruit flies in the morning.
On 11/06/2001 at 11:10 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
http://www.well.com/user/pdcawley/misc_images/
But I may be biased.
Nah, they are nice. But you've been selective, I'm assuming (unless
you've just taken seven photos in your
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/06/2001 at 11:10 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
http://www.well.com/user/pdcawley/misc_images/
But I may be biased.
Nah, they are nice. But you've been selective,
Of course,
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not very perlish I'm afraid.
a) I'm sure that will change in time (any camel shots?).
b) That makes it an appropriate topic for this list.
Ian
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from
On 11/06/2001 at 12:46 +0100, Ian Brayshaw wrote:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not very perlish I'm afraid.
a) I'm sure that will change in time (any camel shots?).
http://husk.org/lndn/circ/compat/DSCF0102.jpg
See, the advantages of posting everything.
--
:: paul
:: 'aggressive is
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:44:40PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
Which reminds me of something I read in the PuTTY FAQ:
Question: Would you like me to register you a snappier domain
name? The PuTTY web page is hard to find.
Answer: No,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:23:26PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Just thinking about why they are your favourites and what you did to
make the image will improve your general photography. Certainly my
contacts sheets have got generally better as I've taken more photographs
and gone through the
Piers Cawley sent the following bits through the ether:
Unlikely. http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png is
vaguely perlish though.
Taking pictures of me when I've a) not slept much b) was tired anyway
c) at morning when I haven't had a shower probably isn't going to produce the
At 13:01 11/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
Unlikely. http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png is
vaguely perlish though.
Hey, that's a good photo. It's Leontastic.
--
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this
was?
Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off
big-time on Amazon. Somehow I've managed to make her thing that my input
is useful and I've just
I consider this a massive improvement.
The mere fact that Perl and CGI are actually differentiated in the title
is a marvel in and of itself. Thank God for small miracles.
Daniel Packer
On 11 Jun 2001, Piers Cawley wrote:
http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png is
vaguely perlish though.
Scary (no offense)
L.
I would say it's a 'fruit knife' but it's not big and it's not cleaver.
Piers Cawley wrote:
I don't know about you, but I'm *definitely* fat.
4XL, innit? (Remembering you at yapc::Europe:19100 at the T-shirt stand,
wondering whether even to bother looking at them.)
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If
Tony Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:23:26PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Just thinking about why they are your favourites and what you did to
make the image will improve your general photography. Certainly my
contacts sheets have got generally better as I've
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley wrote:
I don't know about you, but I'm *definitely* fat.
4XL, innit? (Remembering you at yapc::Europe:19100 at the T-shirt stand,
wondering whether even to bother looking at them.)
4XL Tall acksherly.
--
Piers Cawley
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
At 13:01 11/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
Unlikely. http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png is
vaguely perlish though.
Hey, that's a good photo. It's Leontastic.
No Red eyes, not sitting in front of a picture of well known nazi
leader
Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
AFAIK Samba implements the SMB protocol, which is the
native resource (file, printer, ...) sharing protocol of
Windows. So if you have Windows, you've already got an SMB
client and server running.
for the same reasons
Piers Cawley wrote:
http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png
For some reason, that reminded me of tchrist, especially the region around
the mouth and chin.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the
Leon Brocard wrote:
Registration might happen pretty soon too.
Ooh, goody. People at work (who fortunately will be paying for me to go to
yapc::Europe again this year) have said they'll want to start to get down
details. Probably better to book hotel, travel, etc. *after* I register for
the
For some reason, that reminded me of tchrist, especially the
---^^^
Is that Northern for Jesus?
--
matt | only a wardrobe away
[Hey, where did your attributions go? Mailer-daemon ate them?]
Matthew Jones wrote:
For some reason, that reminded me of tchrist, especially the
---^^^
Is that Northern for Jesus?
What's Northern? Northern English?
Anyway, it's Unix-login-ese for
t'was probly a Python maniac.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Where's my bloody gun?
I guess it's old news to you all,
but there's a notice on http://search.cpan.org
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh I forgot to mention:
Where's my bloody gun
you haven't got one any more, the government decided they were just too
dangerous for you to play with.
--
Robin Szemeti
Redpoint
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it's old news to you all,
but there's a notice on http://search.cpan.org
to the effect that it has been hacked.
I use this a lot.
What IS the mentality of idiots who attack community sites
like this?
maybe it was just a script kiddie
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:26:39AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
(If I understand the current requirements, you have to buy MacOS (from Apple)
or Windows (from Microsoft) to run your free (no cost) browser)
IIUIC IE on MacOS lets you look at the site, but you can't do anything
useful due to
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:26:39AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
(If I understand the current requirements, you have to buy MacOS (from Apple)
or Windows (from Microsoft) to run your free (no cost) browser)
Looking at open.gov.uk, there is mention of the move to ukonline.gov.uk
but no mention
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Chris Benson wrote:
Didn't ukonline.co.uk complain about trademark infringement a while back?
Is gateway.gov.uk the result? and is there any possible trademark confusion
with this address?
ring ring
'hello .. is that the government? .. oh good. I'd like to complain
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:25:32AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
You're very probably stuck. Whilst you can use a hex editor to change
strings in the binary, you can't expand the length of those strings,
only contract them or retain the same length.
However, a solution would be to change
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Richard Clamp wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:57:52PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:10:53PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
And how about a signal/noise bias? ;-)
The noise *is* signal.
I'll have what he's drinking.
Drinking ? SEE
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Redvers Davies sent the following bits through the ether:
I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps
about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 12:16:03PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this
was?
Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off
big-time on Amazon. Somehow I've managed to make her thing that my input
is
On Sat 09 Jun, Robert Shiels wrote:
Assume for a moment that I'm using lynx on Linux, and I want to send the
government my tax return securely. What are the security implications, can
it actually be done. I don't want to go off half-cocked and complain about
something when I don't fully
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Matthew Robinson wrote:
Apologies in advance if I have missed something blindingly obvious :)
I need to change the default library paths in a compiled copy of perl.
Basically, I want to move /usr/lib/perl5 into /usr/local/lib/perl5. I am
unable to recompile perl as it
On Sun, 10 June 2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Matthew Robinson wrote:
Apologies in advance if I have missed something blindingly obvious :)
I need to change the default library paths in a compiled copy of perl.
Basically, I want to move /usr/lib/perl5 into
We'll start at about 7pm and people will be practiving TPC and YAPC::E
talks.
I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps
about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the
list will be published. [1]
Red
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know about you, but I'm *definitely* fat.
Big boned.
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com
Interim CTO, web server farms,
* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Greg McCarroll wrote on Freitag, 8. Juni 2001 11:11
And some pieces of software just wont be able to be plugged
in - why can't i run Samba on Windows?
Why would you want to?
* in a heterogeneous network i may want to standardise on a single
Dave Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know about you, but I'm *definitely* fat.
Big boned.
Nope.
--
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:13:19PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
here is the results from a partial mbox of ny.pm messages, it is not
that complete an mbox, but it does indicate that we are simply not
doing or best to take over NY.pm
You
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 07:23:32AM +, Redvers Davies wrote:
I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps
about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the
list will be published. [1]
I had an e-mail from Ann Barcomb yesterday saying that my
Redvers Davies sent the following bits through the ether:
I'll be there... btw, has anyone heard back from the YAPC::Europe peeps
about which papers have been accepted?... or have any idea when the
list will be published. [1]
Speakers will be told Real Soon Now. Registration might happen
201 - 300 of 4596 matches
Mail list logo
