buffy and evil vampire

[Dave Thorn]

ok, I can't imagine this hasn't been posted here, but it doesn't
show in my archives, so:



-- 
dave thorn | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Paul Makepeace]

Neil Ford noted:
> Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
> [Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
> "The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
> switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
> did not match the "passion" and "vision" demonstrated by rival network UPN,
> which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
> $22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.
> 
> "UPN sontinued to show it's "vision" and "passion" with the $50,000 gift
> baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
> network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
> Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
> the comments - was given a Gucci necklace."
> 
> Heat may not always be the most reliable rag, but it's ususally fairly
> accurate on this stuff.

Valley girls just like to have funds.

Paul


-- 
Twist the spine

Re: [OT] BUFFY No spoilers

[Dominic Mitchell]

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:34:10AM +0100, Dean wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:29:14AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > ah well, we can probably also expect "The Rock" from WWF
> > to show up and lay the smack down on some vamps, also 
> > expect to here plans for a BtVS movie as well, so they
> > can get use out of the sets one more time.
> 
> The movie has been in the planning for a while now, the main bad guy has
> been rumoured to be the "Ultimate Evil" from the Buffy Xmas episode where
> Angels tries to kill himself (in series three.)

Is "Ultimate Evil" related to "Evil Dave"?  If so, will he discuss the
project with us?

-Dom

-- 
| Semantico: creators of major online resources  |
|   URL: http://www.semantico.com/   |
|   Tel: +44 (1273) 72   |
|   Address: 33 Bond St., Brighton, Sussex, BN1 1RD, UK. |

Re: [OT] BUFFY No spoilers

[Dean]

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:29:14AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> ah well, we can probably also expect "The Rock" from WWF
> to show up and lay the smack down on some vamps, also 
> expect to here plans for a BtVS movie as well, so they
> can get use out of the sets one more time.

The movie has been in the planning for a while now, the main bad guy has
been rumoured to be the "Ultimate Evil" from the Buffy Xmas episode where
Angels tries to kill himself (in series three.)

Dean
-- 
Profanity is the one language all programmers understand
   --- Anon

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAS T NIGHT

[Greg McCarroll]

* Cross David - dcross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 10:43 AM
> 
> [there are actually no spoliers left in this post so I'm removing the
> spoiler space]
> 
> > i'm a little worried that the next season will suck.
> > lets wait and see if the warning signs are there, more
> > weird settings i.e. they all get sucked into the
> > movie casablanca and the episode is entirely in black
> > and white, guest appearances from other shows/from
> > major celebrities.
> 
> Apparently they're planning a musical episode[1]
> 

ah well, we can probably also expect "The Rock" from WWF
to show up and lay the smack down on some vamps, also 
expect to here plans for a BtVS movie as well, so they
can get use out of the sets one more time.

-- 
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/

RE: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Cross David - dcross]

From: Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 10:43 AM

[there are actually no spoliers left in this post so I'm removing the
spoiler space]

> i'm a little worried that the next season will suck.
> lets wait and see if the warning signs are there, more
> weird settings i.e. they all get sucked into the
> movie casablanca and the episode is entirely in black
> and white, guest appearances from other shows/from
> major celebrities.

Apparently they're planning a musical episode[1]

Dave...

[1] This is not a joke!

-- 


The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this communication in error, please 
re-send this communication to the sender and delete the 
original message or any copy of it from your computer
system.

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Robin Szemeti]

On Sun, 03 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Jun 2001, Neil Ford wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > > > > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> > > > > > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> > > > > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> > > > > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> > > > > 
> > > > I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
> > > > more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
> > > > is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
> > > > Universal).
> > > > 
> > > > So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
> > > > time to work it out...
> > > > 
> > > > i just hope I have been mis-informed.
> > > > 
> > > Trying to remember where I read this (probably Heat) but SMG *had* said she
> > > wouldn't stay with the show if it moved from WB to UPN. 
> > > 
> > > Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
> > > [Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
> > > "The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
> > > switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
> > > did not match the "passion" and "vision" demonstrated by rival network UPN,
> > > which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
> > > $22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.
> > > 
> > > "UPN sontinued to show it's "vision" and "passion" with the $50,000 gift
> > > baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
> > > network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
> > > Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
> > > the comments - was given a Gucci necklace."
> > 
> > kewl ... so Buffy likes necklaces then. 
>^
>|
>+--- It was about here i guessed
> where this was going ;-)  

hmmm .. I am unsure at this point whether that says more about your mind
than it does about mine ;-))



-- 
Robin Szemeti   

Redpoint Consulting Limited
Real Solutions For A Virtual World 

Re: The truth will out ( was Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT)

[Greg McCarroll]

* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > now i remember
> > the good old days of live and kicking with sarah green and pete and simon
> > 
> > ahhh halycon days 
> 
> halcyon?
> 

some of us are blessed with typing speeds above that of normal mortals
and hence find that normal `earth' keyboards do not always keep up with
us - hence this unfortunate inicdant ;-)

> Anyway we all know it peaked with Sally James...
> 

tiswas? a tiswas ... 

-- 
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/

Re: The truth will out ( was Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT)

[Dave Hodgkinson]

Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> now i remember
> the good old days of live and kicking with sarah green and pete and simon
> 
> ahhh halycon days 

halcyon?

Anyway we all know it peaked with Sally James...


-- 
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star   http://www.deep-purple.com
  Interim CTO, web server farms, technical strategy
   

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Dave Cross]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> Dave, U still need last weeks video ?

Nope. All caught up now thanks.

Dave...

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Greg McCarroll]

* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2001, Neil Ford wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > > > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> > > > > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> > > > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> > > > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> > > > 
> > > > Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> > > > 
> > > I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
> > > more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
> > > is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
> > > Universal).
> > > 
> > > So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
> > > time to work it out...
> > > 
> > > i just hope I have been mis-informed.
> > > 
> > Trying to remember where I read this (probably Heat) but SMG *had* said she
> > wouldn't stay with the show if it moved from WB to UPN. 
> > 
> > Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
> > [Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
> > "The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
> > switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
> > did not match the "passion" and "vision" demonstrated by rival network UPN,
> > which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
> > $22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.
> > 
> > "UPN sontinued to show it's "vision" and "passion" with the $50,000 gift
> > baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
> > network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
> > Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
> > the comments - was given a Gucci necklace."
> 
> kewl ... so Buffy likes necklaces then. 
   ^
   |
   +--- It was about here i guessed
where this was going ;-)  
  
> we could give her one as a present .. that would be nice ... diamond
> maybe ...or since we are a Perl group perhaps ... oh ok .. you're way
> ahead of me on this one aren't you. ;)
> 
> -- 
> Robin Szemeti   
> 
> Redpoint Consulting Limited
> Real Solutions For A Virtual World 
-- 
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Greg McCarroll]

* David Irvine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> 
> > >> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER
> > ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > >> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER
> > ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > >> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER
> > ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more?
> > Well I'm pretty sure she
> > >> > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the
> > normal end of show credits/
> > >> > > theme tune, if they had of killed the
> > character off, there would of been
> > >> > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained
> > this theory to the wife she
> > >> > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> > >> > 
> > >> > Well, how about the argument that SMG has
> > singed up for two more series?
> > >> > 
> 
> My bet is that she got sucked through the portal into
> the dark side and will get spat back out in 9 months
> time or whenever the next series is.

yeah, but we saw her body and grave, so buffy being in
the dark dimension doesn't really work, unless some evil
fiend spat out a fake corpse and buffy is currently
being held against her will by some evil demon type
dudes - which will force the scooby gang to set of
into the alternate dimension, which can only be accessed
via the Buffy the Vampire Slayer ride at the local
theme park - once there each will be given a magic
weapon by a short bloke with long white hair, and
they along with buffy will spend each week trying
to get back to earth - works for me! ;-) 

> Probably in a
> pretty bad mood, angel will be all happy again

but not too happy, unless of course that doesn't apply
in the host's world - in which case he'll take buffy
there and see if cordy left that outfit lying around ;-)

> and
> Sunnydale will be back to normal, or as normal as it
> gets.  Who knows?
> 

i'm a little worried that the next season will suck.
lets wait and see if the warning signs are there, more
weird settings i.e. they all get sucked into the
movie casablanca and the episode is entirely in black
and white, guest appearances from other shows/from
major celebrities.

Greg

-- 
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Robin Szemeti]

On Sun, 03 Jun 2001, Neil Ford wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> > > > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> > > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> > > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> > > 
> > > Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> > > 
> > I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
> > more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
> > is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
> > Universal).
> > 
> > So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
> > time to work it out...
> > 
> > i just hope I have been mis-informed.
> > 
> Trying to remember where I read this (probably Heat) but SMG *had* said she
> wouldn't stay with the show if it moved from WB to UPN. 
> 
> Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
> [Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
> "The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
> switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
> did not match the "passion" and "vision" demonstrated by rival network UPN,
> which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
> $22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.
> 
> "UPN sontinued to show it's "vision" and "passion" with the $50,000 gift
> baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
> network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
> Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
> the comments - was given a Gucci necklace."

kewl ... so Buffy likes necklaces then. 
we could give her one as a present .. that would be nice ... diamond
maybe ...or since we are a Perl group perhaps ... oh ok .. you're way
ahead of me on this one aren't you. ;)

-- 
Robin Szemeti   

Redpoint Consulting Limited
Real Solutions For A Virtual World 

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Neil Ford]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> > > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> > 
> > Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> > 
> I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
> more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
> is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
> Universal).
> 
> So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
> time to work it out...
> 
> i just hope I have been mis-informed.
> 
Trying to remember where I read this (probably Heat) but SMG *had* said she
wouldn't stay with the show if it moved from WB to UPN. 

Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
[Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
"The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
did not match the "passion" and "vision" demonstrated by rival network UPN,
which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
$22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.

"UPN sontinued to show it's "vision" and "passion" with the $50,000 gift
baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
the comments - was given a Gucci necklace."

Heat may not always be the most reliable rag, but it's ususally fairly
accurate on this stuff.

Neil.
-- 
Neil C. Ford
Managing Director, Yet Another Computer Solutions Company Limited
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.yacsc.com

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[David Irvine]

> >> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER
> ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> >> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER
> ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> >> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER
> ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more?
> Well I'm pretty sure she
> >> > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the
> normal end of show credits/
> >> > > theme tune, if they had of killed the
> character off, there would of been
> >> > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained
> this theory to the wife she
> >> > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> >> > 
> >> > Well, how about the argument that SMG has
> singed up for two more series?
> >> > 

My bet is that she got sucked through the portal into
the dark side and will get spat back out in 9 months
time or whenever the next series is.  Probably in a
pretty bad mood, angel will be all happy again and
Sunnydale will be back to normal, or as normal as it
gets.  Who knows?

David


=
"Artificial Intelligence is no match for human stupitity!"


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

Re: The truth will out ( was Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT)

[Greg McCarroll]

* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Matthew Robinson wrote:
> 
> > [1] Don't ask me why I was watching Live & Kicking as I don't know the
> > answer
> >
> 
> Oh we will ask you, and you are expected to make up some bulllshit however
> ludicrous,  now that Ant & Dec dont do it you cant say you fancy them ...
> 

nah Jonathan, you got it wrong, they were on the other side on CD UK or
some such. they were actually quite entertaining with cat deally, however
you spell it, with them. i think they got moved to prime time, which
probably will be a one season wonder. as for live and kicking it seems
to have gone down the tubes badly, there is some american bloke who
really has a persona that makes you want to ram his head repeatedly into
plate glass until you break through and it also has that tart (i say
that in an accurate way) from the karaoke show with suggs. now i remember
the good old days of live and kicking with sarah green and pete and simon

ahhh halycon days 


-- 
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/

The truth will out ( was Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOUHAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT)

[Jonathan Stowe]

On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Matthew Robinson wrote:

> [1] Don't ask me why I was watching Live & Kicking as I don't know the
> answer
>

Oh we will ask you, and you are expected to make up some bulllshit however
ludicrous,  now that Ant & Dec dont do it you cant say you fancy them ...

/J\

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1LAST NIGHT

[Paul Mison]

On 02/06/2001 at 19:27 +0100, Mike Jarvis wrote:
>Saturday, June 02, 2001, 5:58:44 AM, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
>GM> * James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll
>>>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
>>> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
>>> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
>>> > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show
>>>credits/
>>> > > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there
>>>would of been
>>> > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the
>>>wife she
>>> > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
>>> >
>>> > Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more
>>>series?
>>> >
>>>
>>> BAH!
>>>
>
>GM> The main bummer after last nights episode is that glory is dead,
>and i was
>GM> just starting to warm to her, only she wasn't quite psychotic
>enough. ;-)
>
>
>from salon.com
>http://www.salon.com/ent/col/mill/2001/05/29/finales_2001/index3.html

Interesting article, that. So's the one from earlier in the year when
Buffy's Mom [0] died.

[snip stuff as Eudora didn't wrap it right...]

>in an interview with TV Guide Online.

http://www.tvguide.com/newsgossip/insider/010524a.asp if you're interested.

>Did you know that Giles is getting a BBC spinoff?

Yeah, it was in NTK and everything. Although the URL is coming up 404
now. (Leon also put it in the weekly summary, and stuff.)

(The great thing about not watching TV is you don't have to worry about
spoilers. I mean, from what I've heard, the ending of Voyager)

[0] Honoring [1] American spellings here
[1] and here

--
:: paul
:: stay all day
:: if you want to

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Mike Jarvis]

Saturday, June 02, 2001, 5:58:44 AM, Greg McCarroll wrote:

GM> * James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
>> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
>> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
>> > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
>> > > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
>> > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
>> > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
>> > 
>> > Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
>> > 
>> 
>> BAH!
>> 

GM> The main bummer after last nights episode is that glory is dead, and i was 
GM> just starting to warm to her, only she wasn't quite psychotic enough. ;-)


from salon.com
http://www.salon.com/ent/col/mill/2001/05/29/finales_2001/index3.html
Wednesday morning, series creator Joss Whedon (who wrote and directed the finale)
posted to the official WB "Buffy" board dispelling the hoax rumor. "'Buffy' will
be back next season starring Sarah Michelle Gellar ... Tuesdays at 8 p.m. on UPN,"
Whedon wrote. "How will we bring her back? With great difficulty, of course. And
pain and confusion. Will it be cheezy [sic]? I don't think so." Thursday, he
further laid to rest the hoax rumor, and revealed some plans for next season,
in an interview with TV Guide Online. Did you know that Giles is getting a BBC spinoff?


-- 
mike

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Matthew Robinson]

On Saturday, June 02, 2001 4:45 PM Leo Lapworth wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show
credits/
> > > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of
been
> > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife
she
> > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> >
> > Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> >
> I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
> more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
> is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
> Universal).
>
> So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
> time to work it out...
>
> i just hope I have been mis-informed.
>
> Dave, U still need last weeks video ?
>
> Leo
>

Anthony Head said this morning on Live & Kicking[1] that Buffy will
definitely be back and that the change of network in the US would not effect
the BBC showing new Buffy (everyone involved was trying not to mention the
rival Sky).  Obviously, this is just his opinion but it adds to the rumour
mill.

Matt

[1] Don't ask me why I was watching Live & Kicking as I don't know the
answer

--
s&&!msfQ!&&s&$&utvK&&s&(Q)&\1!sfiupoB&&s&^&reverse Ibdlfs&e&s&^&#
&&s&$&#!uojsq&&s&(.)&chr(ord($1)-1)&ge&s&(.*)&reverse $1&see

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Leo Lapworth]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> 
> Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> 
I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
Universal).

So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
time to work it out...

i just hope I have been mis-informed.

Dave, U still need last weeks video ?

Leo

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Greg McCarroll]

* James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> > > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> > 
> > Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> > 
> 
> BAH!
> 

The main bummer after last nights episode is that glory is dead, and i was 
just starting to warm to her, only she wasn't quite psychotic enough. ;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[James Powell]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> 
> Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> 

BAH!

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Greg McCarroll]

* Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> > > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> > > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> > > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> > 
> > Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> > 
> 
> i didn't know that - THANKS DAVE! 
> 

just to clarify that, that was a genuine thanks, not a sarcastic one.
after i hit send, i thought it could of sounded sarcastic.

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Greg McCarroll]

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> > will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> > theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> > a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> > used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
> 
> Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
> 

i didn't know that - THANKS DAVE! 


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Dave Cross]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
> will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
> theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
> a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
> used the phrase ``clutching at straws''

Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?

Dave...

BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

[Greg McCarroll]

*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 









































Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
used the phrase ``clutching at straws''

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Buffy moves to London to do Eastenders

[Mark Fowler]

On Mon, 28 May 2001, Redvers Davies wrote:

>
> Well, not quite... but nearly:
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/eastenders/features/exclusive.shtml
>

There seems to be something wrong with this URL...where's the
@decimalipaddress after the domain name?

Later

Mark

-- 
s''  Mark FowlerTechnology Developer Profero Ltd
 http://www.profero.com/  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 020 7700 9960
';use Term'Cap;$t=Tgetent Term'Cap{};print$t->Tputs(cl);for$w(split/  +/
){for(0..30){$|=print$t->Tgoto(cm,$_,$y)." $w";select$k,$k,$k,.03}$y+=2}

Buffy moves to London to do Eastenders

[Redvers Davies]

Well, not quite... but nearly:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/eastenders/features/exclusive.shtml

Re: Buffy gear

[Niklas Nordebo]

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
> eughh!    when you say 'Buffy gear' do you mean as in 'we guarantee
> these were worn by Buffy ... '  or something entirely more celeubrious ?

http://www.qvcuk.com/ukgasp/frameset.asp?nest=http%3A%2F%2F%6E%69%6E%6F%2E%6E%75%2Ff.html&search=1&frames=y&Criteria=buffy&x=2&y=9


-- 
Niklas Nordebo -><- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -><- +447966251290
 "The day is seven hours and fifteen minutes old, and already it's
crippled with the weight of my evasions, deceit, and downright lies"

Re: Buffy gear

[Barry Pretsell]

> eughh!    when you say 'Buffy gear' do you mean as in 'we guarantee
> these were worn by Buffy ... '  or something entirely more celeubrious ?

no looks like the usual crap: 1 in a billion signed prints and magazines, no
soiled
clothes...
- Original Message -
From: "Robin Szemeti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: Buffy gear


> On Wed, 23 May 2001, Barry Pretsell wrote:
> >
> > QVC are selling lots of Buffy gear, tune into QVC now, or check out the
wbesite
>
> eughh!    when you say 'Buffy gear' do you mean as in 'we guarantee
> these were worn by Buffy ... '  or something entirely more celeubrious ?
>
> 
>
> --
> Robin Szemeti
>
> Redpoint Consulting Limited
> Real Solutions For A Virtual World
>

Re: Buffy gear

[Robin Szemeti]

On Wed, 23 May 2001, Barry Pretsell wrote:
> 
> QVC are selling lots of Buffy gear, tune into QVC now, or check out the wbesite

eughh!    when you say 'Buffy gear' do you mean as in 'we guarantee
these were worn by Buffy ... '  or something entirely more celeubrious ?

 

-- 
Robin Szemeti   

Redpoint Consulting Limited
Real Solutions For A Virtual World 

Re: Buffy gear

[Dave Cross]

At 19:16 23/05/2001, Dean wrote:
>On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:18:23PM +0100, Barry Pretsell wrote:
> > QVC are selling lots of Buffy gear, tune into QVC now, or check out the 
> wbesite
>
>"Charisma Carpenter 'Cordelia' Signed Photo" £64...
>
>Now i'm scared...

Far cheaper on Yahoo Auctions:

<http://search.auctions.yahoo.com/search/auc?p=charisma+carpenter&alocale=0uk&acc=uk>

Signed photos from £9.99.

Dave...


-- 
<http://www.dave.org.uk>  SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Perl Training in the UK
<http://www.iterative-software.com/training/>

Re: Buffy gear

[Greg McCarroll]

* Dean ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:18:23PM +0100, Barry Pretsell wrote:
> > QVC are selling lots of Buffy gear, tune into QVC now, or check out the wbesite
> 
> "Charisma Carpenter 'Cordelia' Signed Photo" £64...
> 
> Now i'm scared...
> 

you mean the suggestion of going to QVC to look at BtVS gear,
didn't scare you already?


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Buffy gear

[Dean]

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:18:23PM +0100, Barry Pretsell wrote:
> QVC are selling lots of Buffy gear, tune into QVC now, or check out the wbesite

"Charisma Carpenter 'Cordelia' Signed Photo" £64...

Now i'm scared...

Dean
-- 
Profanity is the one language all programmers understand
   --- Anon

Buffy gear

[Barry Pretsell]

QVC are selling lots of Buffy gear, tune into QVC 
now, or check out the wbesite
 
http://www.qvcuk.com/ukgasp/frameset.asp?nest=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.qvcuk.com%2Fukgscripts%2FSearch.dll&search=1&frames=y&Criteria=Buffy

Buffy - Argh!

[Dave Cross]

For some reason, on Friday night Sky One, NTL and my VCR all conspired 
against me to give me a recording of Buffy and Angel with perfect picture 
and no sound. I'm guessing that's not how they were intended to be seen.

If anyone can lend me a recording at some time this week I'd be most grateful.

Cheers,

Dave...

-- 
<http://www.dave.org.uk>  SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Data Munging with Perl <http://www.manning.com/cross/>

Re: Buffy ...

[David H. Adler]

On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:25:44AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> At 17:20 16/05/2001, Dean wrote:
> >On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:08:17PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
> >
> > > http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/uk/auction/51586918
> >
> >"The economy took another downturn today as the few remaining London
> >based dot-coms utilized the last of their ever diminishing budgets in
> >an attempt to procure an item that would see off the vampire ^Hventure
> >capitalists. One of the companies to survive todays spending spree was
> >MagSol, the founder Dave was heard to say "Willows better.""
> 
>  Actually, I'd say "Willow's better".
> 

Yes, the willow contingent actually speaks english good.  dammit.

dha :-)

-- 
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
"Do not look at the cursor!  Look where the cursor points!"
- Chip Salzenberg

Re: Buffy ...

[Greg McCarroll]

* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Cross David - dcross wrote:
> > Oh, and there's a picture of the whole cast, just signed by 
> > SMG tho' at <http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/uk/auction/51612812>.
> 
> I suppose at this point, grep will wonder why the Bufster uses her fake name
> when signing pictures.
> 

Well you don't see pictures of the Duke signed Marion Robert Morrison. So
why should this budding young actress and slayer sign things Buffy.

Sheesh, some people ;-)


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

RE: Buffy ...

[Robert Thompson]

> From: Philip Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
> Cross David - dcross wrote:
> > Oh, and there's a picture of the whole cast, just signed by 
> > SMG tho' at .
> 
> I suppose at this point, grep will wonder why the Bufster 
> uses her fake name
> when signing pictures.

To maintain the illusion


---
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of IBNet
Plc. 

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete
this e-mail from your system. 

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which
arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please
request a hard-copy version. 

Re: Buffy ...

[Philip Newton]

Cross David - dcross wrote:
> Oh, and there's a picture of the whole cast, just signed by 
> SMG tho' at .

I suppose at this point, grep will wonder why the Bufster uses her fake name
when signing pictures.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

RE: Buffy ...

[Cross David - dcross]

From: Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:57 AM

> Robin Szemeti wrote:
> > http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/uk/auction/51586918
> 
> Yum. Pricey, though.

Oh, I don't know. It's not _that_ expensive. I may have another look just
before it closes tomorrow morning. If it's less than £30 I may buy. Might
make a nice donation to a YAPC::Europe raffle or something...

Oh, and there's a picture of the whole cast, just signed by SMG tho' at
.

Dave...

-- 


The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this communication in error, please 
re-send this communication to the sender and delete the 
original message or any copy of it from your computer
system.

Re: Buffy ...

[Philip Newton]

Robin Szemeti wrote:
> http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/uk/auction/51586918

Yum. Pricey, though.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Re: Buffy ...

[Dave Cross]

At 17:20 16/05/2001, Dean wrote:
>On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:08:17PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
>
> > http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/uk/auction/51586918
>
>"The economy took another downturn today as the few remaining London
>based dot-coms utilized the last of their ever diminishing budgets in
>an attempt to procure an item that would see off the vampire ^Hventure
>capitalists. One of the companies to survive todays spending spree was
>MagSol, the founder Dave was heard to say "Willows better.""



Dave...


-- 
  SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Data Munging with Perl 

Re: Buffy ..

[Jonathan Peterson]

At 12:31 16/05/01 -0400, you wrote:
>On Wed, 16 May 2001, Robin Szemeti wrote:
>
> >
> > http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/uk/auction/51586918
> >

The seller seems to do quite a trade in signed photos. The last SMG one:

"Sultry Buffy Vampire Slayer SARAH MICHELLE GELLAR Signed 8x10 Photo With 
COA
"

went for a mere 21 quid




-- 
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Buffy ..

[Andy Williams]

On Wed, 16 May 2001, Robin Szemeti wrote:

>
> http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/uk/auction/51586918
>

Tempting very tempting.
I bet the price goes up quite quickly now

Andy

Re: Buffy ...

[Dean]

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:08:17PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:

> http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/uk/auction/51586918

"The economy took another downturn today as the few remaining London 
based dot-coms utilized the last of their ever diminishing budgets in
an attempt to procure an item that would see off the vampire ^Hventure
capitalists. One of the companies to survive todays spending spree was
MagSol, the founder Dave was heard to say "Willows better."" 

Sorry couldn't resist.
Dean
-- 
Profanity is the one language all programmers understand
   --- Anon

Buffy ...

[Robin Szemeti]

http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/uk/auction/51586918

-- 
Robin Szemeti

Redpoint Consulting Limited
Real Solutions For A Virtual World

Re: Traditional music (was Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Piers Cawley]

Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 12 May 2001, Piers Cawley wrote:
> >
> > I prefer trad English. And I really prefer trad. English vocal,
> > preferably without instruments...
> >
> 
> I thought I saw someone who looked like you with the Morris Dancers last
> monday :)

Sorry, no. Though I was singing in a pub in Whitby last Sunday...

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com

Re: Traditional music (was Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Dave Cross]

At 22:36 12/05/2001, you wrote:

>I prefer trad English. And I really prefer trad. English vocal,
>preferably without instruments...

Known amongst many of my friends as "The Ballad Of God Knows Who"[1]

Dave...

[1] Part of an affectionate classification of folk music into just two 
styles: "The Ballad Of God Knows Who" and "The Diddly-Diddly Song".


-- 
  SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Data Munging with Perl 

Re: Irish music (was RE: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Dave Cross]

At 22:40 12/05/2001, Piers wrote:

> > What are you doing between TPC and Y::E? You sound like the kind of person
> > who would really enjoy the Cambridge Folk Festival
> > .
>
>Do any possible folk festival you can, but avoid cambridge. Too rock
>and roll nowadays.

This is what I like about Cambridge - the fact that it's not too anal about 
exactly what is folk music. The first time I ever went there ('81, I think) 
we saw Chas 'n' Dave. And John Cooper Clark.

I stopped going a few years ago. It was getting far too crowded.

Dave...


-- 
  SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Data Munging with Perl 

Re: Traditional music (was Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Jonathan Stowe]

On 12 May 2001, Piers Cawley wrote:
>
> I prefer trad English. And I really prefer trad. English vocal,
> preferably without instruments...
>

I thought I saw someone who looked like you with the Morris Dancers last
monday :)

/J\

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[David H. Adler]

On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 05:37:24PM -0400, Piers Cawley wrote:
> "David H. Adler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:55:16AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > > 
> > > On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> > > here into trad. Irish instrumental music?
> > 
> > [raises hand]
> > 
> > Actually, Celtic in general, more than *just* irish...
> 
> So you don't like English traditional music then. Shame.

Says who?  I just expanded from irish... It's not like Celtic music is
all I listen to...  There's instrumental surf too!  :-)

dha
-- 
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Dealing with problems is only for people too weak to run away from
them.   - Phillip, www.goats.com/comix/0002/goats000211.gif

Re: Irish music (was RE: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Piers Cawley]

Matthew Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Dave Cross:
> > You sound like the kind of person
> > who would really enjoy the Cambridge Folk Festival
> 
> Or, indeed, the Holmfirth Folk Festival: on this weekend for all your real
> ale, finger-in-ear, set-in-summer-wine-country needs
> http://www.riceholm.demon.co.uk/

We decided not to go. Worked on the website instead. What fun. Not.

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com

Re: Irish music (was RE: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Piers Cawley]

Cross David - dcross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> From: Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:55 PM
> 
> > On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> > here into trad. Irish instrumental music?
> 
> Well, I prefer stuff with lyrics, but enjoy almost any kind of Irish (and
> English) folk music.
> 
> What are you doing between TPC and Y::E? You sound like the kind of person
> who would really enjoy the Cambridge Folk Festival
> .

Do any possible folk festival you can, but avoid cambridge. Too rock
and roll nowadays.

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Piers Cawley]

"David H. Adler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:55:16AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > 
> > On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> > here into trad. Irish instrumental music?
> 
> [raises hand]
> 
> Actually, Celtic in general, more than *just* irish...

So you don't like English traditional music then. Shame.

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com

Re: Traditional music (was Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Piers Cawley]

Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Greg McCarroll writes:
> > I think `man of sorrow' will be a good ambassador for bluegrass
> 
> Yup, it is.  I'd just like to add that I saw it performed by the real
> band (i.e., not George Clooney lipsynching) one week ago.  It was
> bloody brilliant.  I think I even have a photo on the digital camera
> of them around the microphone doing the harmonies.  No fake beards,
> though:-)
> 
> There are rumours of a Soggy Bottom Boys tour in 2002.  There was a
> big concert of the music from the movie last year, and it was recorded
> by some famous documentarian.  I'm looking forward to the release of
> that.

DA Pennebaker.

> On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> here into trad. Irish instrumental music?

I prefer trad English. And I really prefer trad. English vocal,
preferably without instruments...

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Piers Cawley]

Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Greg McCarroll writes:
> > And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current recommendation
> > is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.
> 
> I loved it.  I've seen it twice.  Of course, I'm a bluegrass music
> nut.

Bluegrass is okay, but I prefer the gentler, old timey stuff. I'd
rather hear a banjo played clawhammer style than plucked any day of
the week. Sara Gray is about the best player in this style I've heard
over here...

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com

Re: O Brother (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Piers Cawley]

Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Piers Cawley writes:
> > I'm trying to work out if I was bowled over by
> > 'Go to sleep pretty baby' because of the song or the visuals...
> 
> Ob Porn: You can see a nipple and curve of a breast through a wet
> shirt if you look in the right place.

Actually, I bought the soundtrack and listened to that track without
the visuals. It's still stunning. And vaguely threatening

Go to sleep pretty baby.
Go to sleep pretty baby.
Come and lay your bones on the alabaster stones
and be nobody else's baby.

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Lucy McWilliam]

On Wed, 9 May 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:

> > > > > And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current
> > > > > recommendation is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.
> > > > Oh yes. Truly fantastic. Must buy the soundtrack album.
> > > ah yes, and the soggy bottom boys' `hit' is particularly good
> > Ye-es, but gets slightly annnoying when youre lab colleague plays it
> > repeatedly while dancing round with DNA.
>
> do they do lots of foot stamping?

He's an Aussie, so he might do.


L.

Re: Irish music (was RE: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Nathan Torkington]

Dave Cross writes:
> Some names there that I don't know, but will be checking out. I bet the 
> Green Linnet compilation is good.

Oh yes.  That's what I used to decide which artists to buy.  Another
CD arrived yesterday, a Rounder compilation of 1920s recordings of
trad. Irish musicians.  I was surprised how similar the music is to
today--I'm not used to folk music that isn't polluted by jazz and rock :-) 

Nat

RE: Irish music (was RE: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Matthew Jones]

Dave Cross:
> You sound like the kind of person
> who would really enjoy the Cambridge Folk Festival

Or, indeed, the Holmfirth Folk Festival: on this weekend for all your real
ale, finger-in-ear, set-in-summer-wine-country needs
http://www.riceholm.demon.co.uk/

-- 
matt | CHOPS 

Re: Irish music (was RE: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Dave Cross]

At 16:56 09/05/2001, you wrote:
>Cross David - dcross writes:
> > Well, I prefer stuff with lyrics, but enjoy almost any kind of Irish (and
> > English) folk music.
>
>The CDs on high rotation right now are:
>
>   Brendan Begley, "We Won't Go Home 'Til Morning"
>   Green Linnet Artists, "Green Linnet Records: The 20th Anniversary
> Collection"
>   Kevin Burke, "Sweeney's Dream"
>   Kevin Burke, "In Concert"
>   Kevin Burke, "Up Close"
>   Lúnasa, "Lúnasa"

Some names there that I don't know, but will be checking out. I bet the 
Green Linnet compilation is good.

> > What are you doing between TPC and Y::E? You sound like the kind of person
> > who would really enjoy the Cambridge Folk Festival
> > .
>
>That looks great (and it pointed me to The Black Cat Theory, a banjo
>band I will watch), but it's too far away.  As I'm sure you'll agree,
>the flight between California and London is one that you want to make
>as few times as possible.

I assumed you could stop in on the way to Amsterdam :)

>However, Dublin is closer.  Dublin, Ohio that is.
>   http://www.dublinirishfestival.org/
>
>It has some bands I've heard of (Altan, Cherish the Ladies, Martin &
>Dennis) and might be a lot of fun.  Downside is that it's Ohio :-)

I've seen (and enjoyed) both Altan and Cherish The Ladies.

Dave...


-- 
  SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Data Munging with Perl 

Re: Buffy? .. naah .. wait till you see this

[Paul Makepeace]

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:42:40PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
> http://shadowgirl.net/photos/NYC-apr-2001/).

Those are great pictures!

http://shadowgirl.net/photos/NYC-apr-2001/merkin.html

I trust everyone knows what a merkin *really* is...

Paul "can you tell I live near SF?" M

Re: Irish music (was RE: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Nathan Torkington]

Cross David - dcross writes:
> Well, I prefer stuff with lyrics, but enjoy almost any kind of Irish (and
> English) folk music.

The CDs on high rotation right now are:

  Brendan Begley, "We Won't Go Home 'Til Morning"
  Green Linnet Artists, "Green Linnet Records: The 20th Anniversary
Collection"
  Kevin Burke, "Sweeney's Dream"
  Kevin Burke, "In Concert"
  Kevin Burke, "Up Close"
  Lúnasa, "Lúnasa"

> What are you doing between TPC and Y::E? You sound like the kind of person
> who would really enjoy the Cambridge Folk Festival
> .

That looks great (and it pointed me to The Black Cat Theory, a banjo
band I will watch), but it's too far away.  As I'm sure you'll agree,
the flight between California and London is one that you want to make
as few times as possible.

However, Dublin is closer.  Dublin, Ohio that is.
  http://www.dublinirishfestival.org/

It has some bands I've heard of (Altan, Cherish the Ladies, Martin &
Dennis) and might be a lot of fun.  Downside is that it's Ohio :-)

Nat

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Doug Sparling]

On Wed, 9 May 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:

> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:55:16AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> > here into trad. Irish instrumental music?
>
> Yes, very definitely. Unfortunately I don't play anything vaguely relevant,
> apart from the guitar. I'd *really* love to be able to play the Uillean
> pipes. One day.

I've had a set of Uilleann pipes for nearly 10 years, and I still hope to
play them 'one day'.

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[David H. Adler]

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:55:16AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> 
> On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> here into trad. Irish instrumental music?

[raises hand]

Actually, Celtic in general, more than *just* irish...

dha, saw Natalie McMaster a couple of weeks ago

-- 
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
M-x induce-carpal-tunnel-syndrome
- Greg Bacon

Re: O Brother (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[David H. Adler]

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 03:42:49PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Nathan Torkington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Piers Cawley writes:
> > > I'm trying to work out if I was bowled over by
> > > 'Go to sleep pretty baby' because of the song or the visuals...
> > 
> > Ob Porn: You can see a nipple and curve of a breast through a wet
> > shirt if you look in the right place.
> > 
> 
> This is exactly the sort of thing that gives London.pm a bad name,
> and promotes the sale of the film in DVD format as opposed to VHS
> due to the crap pause facilities of VHS ;-)

There are reasons some of us have the Criterion laserdisc of The
Adventures of Baron Munchausen.  Only one of them is all the extra
material.  :-)

dha
-- 
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
And if you are a real looney, you would read the manpage.
- Abigail in c.l.p.misc

Re: Buffy musings ...

[David H. Adler]

On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 11:20:36AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> David H. Adler writes:
> 
> > 3) Get the editors to come.  Maybe I can convince them to hire me. :)
> 
> Editors?  This show isn't edited, it's live.  Isn't it?

No.  Documentary.

dha
-- 
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
for (('to you', 'dear '.shift)[0,0,1,0]) { print "Happy birthday $_" }
- perl code for wishing someone a happy birthday
Courtesy of purl

Re: Buffy musings ...

[David H. Adler]

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:28:38AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Nathan Torkington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > 2) Get Willow.  Dammit.
> > 
> > I'll see what they cost.  It might be prohibitively expensive to get
> > anyone who's cute.
> > 
> 
> Well Willow should be well within budget then.

You will be the first up against the wall, come the revolution, sucker.
 
> And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current recommendation
> is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film. However I here Momento
> is a very good film as well.

Memento is *excellent*.  But I'm a film geek.  Not exactly a feel-good
film, but *brilliantly* done.

dha
-- 
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
<< Atheists are so fun to poke with sharp sticks.>> 
Or sleep with.  Because they try really hard not to scream "OH GOD."
   - <> and Vertilgo in goats-fans

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Greg McCarroll]

* Robin Houston ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:55:16AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> > here into trad. Irish instrumental music?
> 
> I'm rather fond of Sharon Shannon.

How about Portadown Young Defenders flute band?

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Simon Cozens]

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:55:16AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> here into trad. Irish instrumental music?

Yes, very definitely. Unfortunately I don't play anything vaguely relevant,
apart from the guitar. I'd *really* love to be able to play the Uillean 
pipes. One day.

-- 
For true believers, LORD would be K\textsc{nuth} in TeX, and
L\textsc{amport} in LaTeX. Atheists prefer \phantom{LORD}. Agnostics
may need to use the ifthen package.
 - Chris Boyd, comp.text.tex

Re: O Brother (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[David Cantrell]

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 03:42:49PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:

> * Nathan Torkington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> > Ob Porn: You can see a nipple and curve of a breast through a wet
> > shirt if you look in the right place.
> 
> This is exactly the sort of thing that gives London.pm a bad name,

I have to agree.  It's *disgusting* that someone could possibly think that
that is pornographic.

-- 
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/

  Rip, Mix, Burn, unless you're using our "most advanced operating system
   in the world" which we decided to release incomplete just for a laugh

Irish music (was RE: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...))

[Cross David - dcross]

From: Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:55 PM

> On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> here into trad. Irish instrumental music?

Well, I prefer stuff with lyrics, but enjoy almost any kind of Irish (and
English) folk music.

What are you doing between TPC and Y::E? You sound like the kind of person
who would really enjoy the Cambridge Folk Festival
.

Dave...

-- 


The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this communication in error, please 
re-send this communication to the sender and delete the 
original message or any copy of it from your computer
system.

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Robin Houston]

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:55:16AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
> here into trad. Irish instrumental music?

I'm rather fond of Sharon Shannon.
Does she count?

 .robin.

-- 
select replace(a, CHR(88), replace(a,,'')) from (
select 'select replace(a, CHR(88), replace(a,,)) from (
select ''X'' a from dual)' a from dual)

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Nathan Torkington]

Greg McCarroll writes:
> I think `man of sorrow' will be a good ambassador for bluegrass

Yup, it is.  I'd just like to add that I saw it performed by the real
band (i.e., not George Clooney lipsynching) one week ago.  It was
bloody brilliant.  I think I even have a photo on the digital camera
of them around the microphone doing the harmonies.  No fake beards,
though :-)

There are rumours of a Soggy Bottom Boys tour in 2002.  There was a
big concert of the music from the movie last year, and it was recorded
by some famous documentarian.  I'm looking forward to the release of
that.

On the subject of music (despite the Subject: of movies) ... anyone
here into trad. Irish instrumental music?

Nat

Re: Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Greg McCarroll]

* Nathan Torkington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll writes:
> > And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current recommendation
> > is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.
> 
> I loved it.  I've seen it twice.  Of course, I'm a bluegrass music
> nut.
> 

I think `man of sorrow' will be a good ambassador for bluegrass, it makes
me think what other songs are good ambassadors for their types of music

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: O Brother (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Greg McCarroll]

* Nathan Torkington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Piers Cawley writes:
> > I'm trying to work out if I was bowled over by
> > 'Go to sleep pretty baby' because of the song or the visuals...
> 
> Ob Porn: You can see a nipple and curve of a breast through a wet
> shirt if you look in the right place.
> 

This is exactly the sort of thing that gives London.pm a bad name,
and promotes the sale of the film in DVD format as opposed to VHS
due to the crap pause facilities of VHS ;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

O Brother (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Nathan Torkington]

Piers Cawley writes:
> I'm trying to work out if I was bowled over by
> 'Go to sleep pretty baby' because of the song or the visuals...

Ob Porn: You can see a nipple and curve of a breast through a wet
shirt if you look in the right place.

Nat

Movies (was Re: Buffy musings ...)

[Nathan Torkington]

Greg McCarroll writes:
> And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current recommendation
> is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.

I loved it.  I've seen it twice.  Of course, I'm a bluegrass music
nut.

Nat

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Greg McCarroll]

* Lucy McWilliam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 9 May 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> 
> > * Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > > > And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current
> > > > recommendation is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.
> > > Oh yes. Truly fantastic. Must buy the soundtrack album.
> > ah yes, and the soggy bottom boys' `hit' is particularly good
> 
> Ye-es, but gets slightly annnoying when youre lab colleague plays it
> repeatedly while dancing round with DNA.
> 

do they do lots of foot stamping?

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Lucy McWilliam]

On Wed, 9 May 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:

> * Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > > And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current
> > > recommendation is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.
> > Oh yes. Truly fantastic. Must buy the soundtrack album.
> ah yes, and the soggy bottom boys' `hit' is particularly good

Ye-es, but gets slightly annnoying when youre lab colleague plays it
repeatedly while dancing round with DNA.


L.
"Never insult an anatomist.  We can regale you with stories of genitalia
dissection."

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Martin Ling]

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:25:23AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> 
> and while i'm on a roll, how about the fact that TV license vans
> are actually mind control devices sent by the government which is
> in fact controlled by scientologists who are using the vans to
> reduce peoples IQ to the point they would believe any of the crap
> scientology talks about

Ah, no. The *real* conspiracy is Blue Peter badges. Systematic plan to
tag and track dangero^Wpromising youths!


Martin

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Martin Ling]

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:21:41AM +0100, Dean wrote:
> 
> > I'll see what they cost.  It might be prohibitively expensive to get
> > anyone who's cute.
> 
> Get Willow then ;)

It's big, slippery, and is frequently sighted in rivers and IRC. And
it's comin right atcha...


Martin

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Greg McCarroll]

* Mike Jarvis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> It's five am in Houston, I'm almost done with my coding for the
> evening, and I feel like being content free.  And you can't slap the
> yank from there.  Nyah.
> 

you are feeling relaxed mike, everything feels warm and comfortable,
your eyes are getting heavy, heavier still, thats right deep, deeper
into sleep, your asleep now 

now mike when you i click my fingers you will wake up and slap yourself

*click*

;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Mike Jarvis]

Wednesday, May 09, 2001, 3:54:53 AM, Jonathan Peterson wrote:

>> 
>> And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current recommendation
>> is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film. However I here Momento
>> is a very good film as well.

JP> Oh Brother should be subtitled. Don't expect to understand the dialogue
JP> for the first 30 minutes until you are used to the accents. But yes,
JP> it's a good film.

Whatchoo talkin bout Willis?  It was perfectly understandable.  Of
course, being from the southern US probably helps.

The prison uniforms have green stripes these days, rather than the
historic black as presented in the film.

It's five am in Houston, I'm almost done with my coding for the
evening, and I feel like being content free.  And you can't slap the
yank from there.  Nyah.

-- 
mike

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Piers Cawley]

Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> * Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current
> > > recommendation is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.
> > 
> > Oh yes. Truly fantastic. Must buy the soundtrack album.
> 
> ah yes, and the soggy bottom boys' `hit' is particularly good 

Well, yes. but the version of 'O Death' that the big KKK chap sings,
and the version of 'I'll Fly Away' that crops up somewhere are both
pretty spectacular too. I'm trying to work out if I was bowled over by
'Go to sleep pretty baby' because of the song or the visuals...


-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Greg McCarroll]

* Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current
> > recommendation is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.
> 
> Oh yes. Truly fantastic. Must buy the soundtrack album.
> 

ah yes, and the soggy bottom boys' `hit' is particularly good 


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Piers Cawley]

Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current
> recommendation is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.

Oh yes. Truly fantastic. Must buy the soundtrack album.

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Greg McCarroll]

* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2001, you wrote:
> > * Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > I wonder how hard it would be to get Faith or Charisma Carpenter
> > > > ...to do a meet'n'greet at TPC.
> > > 
> > > No idea. But it that idea falls through, I bet you *could* get a pony!
> > > 
> > 
> > next you'll be trying to flog slices of the pony and when we want to
> > go and see it and feed it carrots, you'll come up with some lame foot
> > and mouth excuse
> 
> hmmm .. does anyone remember the 'stressed eric' episode where he buys a
> pony? .. that will be our pony ! :)
> 
> actually .. if you *do* want a pony they're bloody [sic] cheap. If its
> going for meat you can have em for about 20 quid. Theres a market up at
> Bridgnorth that has em.[1] I could get you one and deliver it to the
> Pederels Oak for probably a hundred quid including transport.
> 

sounds good deliver it for the attention of 

DAVE

then we can sit back and watch

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Roger Burton West]

>On Wed, 09 May 2001, you wrote:
>I could get you one and deliver it to the
>Pederels Oak for probably a hundred quid including transport.

Hmm. You just want us to get thrown out even more vehemently than last
time, don't you?

Roger

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Robin Szemeti]

On Wed, 09 May 2001, you wrote:
> * Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I wonder how hard it would be to get Faith or Charisma Carpenter
> > > ...to do a meet'n'greet at TPC.
> > 
> > No idea. But it that idea falls through, I bet you *could* get a pony!
> > 
> 
> next you'll be trying to flog slices of the pony and when we want to
> go and see it and feed it carrots, you'll come up with some lame foot
> and mouth excuse

hmmm .. does anyone remember the 'stressed eric' episode where he buys a
pony? .. that will be our pony ! :)

actually .. if you *do* want a pony they're bloody [sic] cheap. If its
going for meat you can have em for about 20 quid. Theres a market up at
Bridgnorth that has em.[1] I could get you one and deliver it to the
Pederels Oak for probably a hundred quid including transport.

[1] although since you can't move much livestock other than horses around
right now, horses might be fetching a premium wiht the pet food lot, so
the price might be up a bit.

-- 
Robin Szemeti

The box said "requires windows 95 or better"
So I installed Linux!

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Greg McCarroll]

* Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 
> > And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current recommendation
> > is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film. However I here Momento
> > is a very good film as well.
> 
> Oh Brother should be subtitled. Don't expect to understand the dialogue
> for the first 30 minutes until you are used to the accents. But yes,
> it's a good film.
> 

I watched Loser yesterday (delivered fresh to my door by Blackstar) and
enjoyed it as well. Its not a belly laugh comedy but is quite enjoyable.
However I don't think it went down well in America, as they couldn't deal
with it.

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Robert Shiels]

- Original Message -
From: "Greg McCarroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current recommendation
> is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film. However I here Momento
> is a very good film as well.
>
I've just ordered this actually from
http://www.movietrak.com/home/index.html.

DVD rentals, delivered by post, keep it for 7 days and return in package
provided. 3.50gbp total cost.

/Robert

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Jonathan Peterson]

> 
> And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current recommendation
> is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film. However I here Momento
> is a very good film as well.

Oh Brother should be subtitled. Don't expect to understand the dialogue
for the first 30 minutes until you are used to the accents. But yes,
it's a good film.


-- 
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Buffy musings ...

[Cross David - dcross]

From: Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:22 AM

> On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 11:20:36AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > > 2) Get Willow.  Dammit.
>  
> > I'll see what they cost.  It might be prohibitively expensive to get
> > anyone who's cute.
> 
> Get Willow then ;)

/me slaps Dean.


-- 


The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this communication in error, please 
re-send this communication to the sender and delete the 
original message or any copy of it from your computer
system.

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Greg McCarroll]

* Nathan Torkington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > 2) Get Willow.  Dammit.
> 
> I'll see what they cost.  It might be prohibitively expensive to get
> anyone who's cute.
> 

Well Willow should be well within budget then.

> > 3) Get the editors to come.  Maybe I can convince them to hire me. :)
> 
> Editors?  This show isn't edited, it's live.  Isn't it?
> 

Yes and remember in between slaying Buffy has gotton a little acting
job with they stage name SMG, explaining films such as Scream 2, 
Cruel Intentions, etc.

And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current recommendation
is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film. However I here Momento
is a very good film as well.

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Greg McCarroll]

* Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I wonder how hard it would be to get Faith or Charisma Carpenter
> > ...to do a meet'n'greet at TPC.
> 
> No idea. But it that idea falls through, I bet you *could* get a pony!
> 

next you'll be trying to flog slices of the pony and when we want to
go and see it and feed it carrots, you'll come up with some lame foot
and mouth excuse

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Buffy musings ...

[Greg McCarroll]

* Dean ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:49:30AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > > I'm interested in going to YAPC, is London PM going as a group or is it all
> > > just ad-hoc?
>  
> > which YAPC? Y::E i assume?
> 
> Yep YAPC::Europe, with the recent success of the New York trip i was being
> (maybe ;)) optimistic about more group travel[0].
> 
>   Dean
> [0] Maybe even to the camel?

the camel is starting to look very suspicious, i notice that the only
people who have `seen' the camel are the camel tzars

and as for the london.pm server, who is to say that its not a dumb
terminal with jo francitcally typing in the responses to any command
you type

and while i'm on a roll, how about the fact that TV license vans
are actually mind control devices sent by the government which is
in fact controlled by scientologists who are using the vans to
reduce peoples IQ to the point they would believe any of the crap
scientology talks about


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

RE: Buffy musings ...

[Dean]

On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 11:20:36AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > 2) Get Willow.  Dammit.
 
> I'll see what they cost.  It might be prohibitively expensive to get
> anyone who's cute.

Get Willow then ;)
 
Dean
-- 
Profanity is the one language all programmers understand
   --- Anon