Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:09:03PM +0200, Jean-Pierre wrote: > > > > Message d'origine > De : Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > Envoyé : 25 mai 2017 16:59:17 GMT+02:00 > À : lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > Objet : Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Message d'origine De : Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> Envoyé : 25 mai 2017 16:59:17 GMT+02:00 À : lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org Objet : Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options Jean-Pierre, what is the status on this? I have not followed closely all the discussions in this

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Jean-Pierre, what is the status on this? I have not followed closely all the discussions in this thread. Is anything blocking progress? Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am Samstag, 15. April 2017 um 18:58:28, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> It seems you are missing some docbook export requirements. > >> What does Help>LaTeX Configuratin tell you about Docbook support? > >> (Here, it says: "Found: no".) > > > "Found: yes" all right. > > Then,

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2017-04-15, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > Le 15/04/2017 à 11:51, Guenter Milde a écrit : >> On 2017-04-14, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: >> If agutex.cls is not in TeXLive, the tests requiring it should be added >> to unreliableTests under the Sublabel: nonstandard >> (Preferably with an URL

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 15/04/2017 à 11:51, Guenter Milde a écrit : On 2017-04-14, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: If agutex.cls is not in TeXLive, the tests requiring it should be added to unreliableTests under the Sublabel: nonstandard (Preferably with an URL for the class file) The link is not available any

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 15/04/2017 à 11:22, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Freitag, 14. April 2017 um 23:36:26, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien The following tests FAILED: 3285 - DEFAULTOUTPUT_export/examples/docbook_article_pdf (Failed) 5644 - export/templates/AGUTeX_pdf

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2017-04-14, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > With this I'm down to 3 failures. > The following tests FAILED: > 3285 - DEFAULTOUTPUT_export/examples/docbook_article_pdf (Failed) > 5644 - export/templates/AGUTeX_pdf (Failed) > 5645 - export/templates/AGUTeX_pdf2 (Failed) > I

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am Freitag, 14. April 2017 um 23:36:26, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > The following tests FAILED: > 3285 - DEFAULTOUTPUT_export/examples/docbook_article_pdf (Failed) > 5644 - export/templates/AGUTeX_pdf (Failed) > 5645 -

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 13/04/2017 à 10:33, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2017 um 09:53:06, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien Le 12/04/2017 à 15:20, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2017 um 14:31:23, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2017 um 09:53:06, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > Le 12/04/2017 à 15:20, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2017 um 14:31:23, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > > > > > >> 2/ the noweb files miss a

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 12/04/2017 à 15:20, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2017 um 14:31:23, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien 2/ the noweb files miss a literate to latex converter (5/33) You mean NoWeb-> latex Ok I see, literate is the short name of the file format

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2017-04-12, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > Le 12/04/2017 à 12:05, Guenter Milde a écrit : ... >>> I applied this, and I am now down to 33 failures : >>> The following tests FAILED: >>> 1777 - export/doc/cs/Tutorial_pdf (Failed) >>> 1778 - DEFAULTOUTPUT_export/doc/cs/Tutorial_pdf2

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2017 um 14:31:23, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien ... > - I had not installed knitr and dependencies in R, knitr.lyx and > Rjournal.lyx > > work OK now by hand (I documented the installation in the wiki); You may want to configure

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 12/04/2017 à 12:05, Guenter Milde a écrit : On 2017-04-11, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: Le 11/04/2017 à 10:13, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Dienstag, 11. April 2017 um 09:33:15, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien I applied this, and I am now down to 33 failures :

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2017-04-11, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > Le 11/04/2017 à 10:13, Kornel Benko a écrit : >> Am Dienstag, 11. April 2017 um 09:33:15, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien >> > I applied this, and I am now down to 33 failures : > The following tests FAILED: > 1777 -

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 11/04/2017 à 18:00, José Abílio Matos a écrit : On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 16.11.06 WEST Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: I still get errors with Literate, knitr, listerrors, noweb2lyx, sweave, DocBook and Rjournal. Not that DocBook is not related with latex. So you can remove it from your list

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 16.11.06 WEST Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > I still get errors with Literate, knitr, listerrors, noweb2lyx, sweave, > DocBook and Rjournal. Not that DocBook is not related with latex. So you can remove it from your list of failures. :-) -- José Abílio

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 11/04/2017 à 10:13, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Dienstag, 11. April 2017 um 09:33:15, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien I'm going to run ctest on last up-to-date master with last up-to-date TL 2016 - on pdf2 output for all but literate programming files; For

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am Dienstag, 11. April 2017 um 09:33:15, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > Le 11/04/2017 à 06:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:00:19PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:13:55PM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: >

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 11/04/2017 à 06:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:00:19PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:13:55PM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: 88% tests passed, 669 tests failed out of 5553 Does this sound correct? I have TL2016 with all language

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:00:19PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:13:55PM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > > > 88% tests passed, 669 tests failed out of 5553 > > Does this sound correct? I have TL2016 with all language collections and > > fonts installed. > >

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:13:55PM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > 88% tests passed, 669 tests failed out of 5553 > Does this sound correct? I have TL2016 with all language collections and > fonts installed. Doesn't seem too strange. If I run all the tests, I get 148 failing out of 6469,

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 21/11/2016 à 18:23, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Montag, 21. November 2016 um 17:13:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien Le 16/10/2016 à 01:03, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:55:49PM +0200, jeanpierre.chret...@free.fr wrote: When I'm ready,

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am Montag, 21. November 2016 um 19:23:54, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Montag, 21. November 2016 um 17:13:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > > > Le 16/10/2016 à 01:03, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:55:49PM +0200,

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am Montag, 21. November 2016 um 17:13:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > Le 16/10/2016 à 01:03, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:55:49PM +0200, jeanpierre.chret...@free.fr wrote: > > > > >> When I'm ready, I will post how I plan to perform

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am Montag, 21. November 2016 um 17:13:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > Le 16/10/2016 à 01:03, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:55:49PM +0200, jeanpierre.chret...@free.fr wrote: > > > > >> When I'm ready, I will post how I plan to perform

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 16/10/2016 à 01:03, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:55:49PM +0200, jeanpierre.chret...@free.fr wrote: When I'm ready, I will post how I plan to perform the changes. Sounds good! Thanks for taking care of it. While preparing for this task, I ran ctest -R export

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:55:49PM +0200, jeanpierre.chret...@free.fr wrote: > I can take this in charge if it not too urgent, because > - my linux box where I will perform tests is currently without internet > connexion (this should be solved by a couple of days hopefully); > - I had some

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

> > Sounds good. Jean-Pierre, since you first proposed this would you > like > to make the changes or do you prefer for me to? I don't have a > preference, but whichever of us does it just needs to make sure that > no > tests go from passing to failing after the change. > > Scott > I can take

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:03:28PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 14.10.2016 um 17:36 schrieb Guenter Milde: > > > For the documentation people, the difference is:... > > Hi Scott and Günter, > > convinced, so fine with me to change everything to automatic. Please commit > directly if the tests

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 08:47:48PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-10-14, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:36:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > >> For the end-user the difference is: > > >> * with "no",

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2016-10-14, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:36:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> For the end-user the difference is: >> * with "no", there is a safeguard against relying on additional packages >> without real

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am 14.10.2016 um 17:36 schrieb Guenter Milde: For the documentation people, the difference is:... Hi Scott and Günter, convinced, so fine with me to change everything to automatic. Please commit directly if the tests were passed to branch (when it is open again) and master (please keep

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:36:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > For the end-user the difference is: > > * with "no", there is a safeguard against relying on additional packages > without real need -> less dependencies when compiling the docs. Wouldn't this be a LyX bug if we rely on an

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2016-10-13, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 07.10.2016 um 19:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Dear Uwe, >> My proposal is to change everything in all .lyx files to "Automatic". >> Then run the ctests to see which exports start failing and revert the >> changes to those corresponding documents. > OK, if all

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:21:17AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 07.10.2016 um 19:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > OK, if all test are passed, we don't risk anything. the question is however, > if this is really necessary. Setting a package to no or to automatic does > not change anything since if

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Am 07.10.2016 um 19:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: My proposal is to change everything in all .lyx files to "Automatic". Then run the ctests to see which exports start failing and revert the changes to those corresponding documents. OK, if all test are passed, we don't risk anything. the

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:24:11PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I don't think I would want to spend the time to manually inspect the > > output of all of the exports. > > There is no need to test *all* exports, just the default (i.e. pdf2) and > only

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:50:35PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> * Changes must not only tested for compilation success but also for correct >> output. > I don't think I would want to spend the time to manually

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:50:35PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > * Changes must not only tested for compilation success but also for correct > output. I don't think I would want to spend the time to manually inspect the output of all of the exports. > That said, I am not against the proposed

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2016-10-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 08:17:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> I don't know whether this is the intention here, but I would give Uwe as >> maintainer the say about the correct settings. > OK, I CC'ed Uwe. I won't

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 08:17:04AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > I don't know whether this is the intention here, but I would give Uwe as > maintainer the say about the correct settings. OK, I CC'ed Uwe. I won't make any changes until we hear from him. In fact, if you are very against the

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2016-10-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:53:13PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> It does not suffice to test whether compilation runs without an error. >> This does in no way guarantee that the output is OK. > I see. I suppose it comes down to whether we think that the

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:53:13PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > It does not suffice to test whether compilation runs without an error. > This does in no way guarantee that the output is OK. I see. I suppose it comes down to whether we think that the proposed changes have a better chance of

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:00:09PM +0200, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > > Sure, I mentioned in a previous thread that it could trigger an error e.g. > in splash.lyx. Indeed, I think I stole the idea from you:

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Le 7 octobre 2016 19:01:26 CEST, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >Many of our documents have custom Math options which I think are >unnecessary for the most part. For example, the Tutorial has everything >set to "Do not load", except for mathdots and mhchem. Setting >everything >to

Re: LyX docs: cleaning up math options

On 2016-10-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > Many of our documents have custom Math options which I think are > unnecessary for the most part. For example, the Tutorial has everything > set to "Do not load", except for mathdots and mhchem. Setting everything >

LyX docs: cleaning up math options

Many of our documents have custom Math options which I think are unnecessary for the most part. For example, the Tutorial has everything set to "Do not load", except for mathdots and mhchem. Setting everything to "Automatic" does not change compilation. I wonder these options might have been set