Re: AMS Article: need Theorems, and SUBSECTIONS to share counter.
On 04/10/2017 01:22, Richard Heck wrote: I just got the following question: Why not reverse the process; Rather than modifying a dozen styles? What would it take to create something like a "Subsection-v2" which would just use as counter the "thm" counter? This can be done, but it would mean creating your own version of theorems-ams. It's easy to do this by copying the old files to new names (in $USERDIR/layouts/) and then modifying them. I'll be happy to explain the process a bit more if you want to do that. Thank you for your generous offer. After a good night's sleep, I will probably do as you suggest and look at theorems-ams. The reason you have to modify so many styles is that all the declarations happen in Theorem, and then the other styles copy them. But the copying happens when the file is originally read: Later modifications to Theorem do not affect, say, Lemma. And each individual counter (e.g., "Lemma \thesubsection") has to be declared independently, anyway. Presumably, there would be a way to fix that, but no one has ever really needed to do it, so it doesn't get done. There's nothing like understanding what's really going on! Regards Ramez
Re: AMS Article: need Theorems, and SUBSECTIONS to share counter.
On 10/03/2017 06:41 PM, rls wrote: > Thanks once more! > > I truly understand the need to RTFM, but sometimes one is tired, just > looking for a quick fix (having gone through Pascal, 8086 assembly, C, > LateX Java, ML, and programmed a half dozen editors...) I understand, of course, and did not mean to tell you to RTFM, as fine as it is. Just, if you do want to understand the details. > I just got the following question: > Why not reverse the process; Rather than modifying a dozen styles? > What would it take to create something like a "Subsection-v2" which > would just use as counter the "thm" counter? This can be done, but it would mean creating your own version of theorems-ams. It's easy to do this by copying the old files to new names (in $USERDIR/layouts/) and then modifying them. I'll be happy to explain the process a bit more if you want to do that. The reason you have to modify so many styles is that all the declarations happen in Theorem, and then the other styles copy them. But the copying happens when the file is originally read: Later modifications to Theorem do not affect, say, Lemma. And each individual counter (e.g., "Lemma \thesubsection") has to be declared independently, anyway. Presumably, there would be a way to fix that, but no one has ever really needed to do it, so it doesn't get done. Richard
Re: AMS Article: need Theorems, and SUBSECTIONS to share counter.
Thanks once more! I truly understand the need to RTFM, but sometimes one is tired, just looking for a quick fix (having gone through Pascal, 8086 assembly, C, LateX Java, ML, and programmed a half dozen editors...) I realize one has to modify every "construct" (Definition, Corollary etc.) I just got the following question: Why not reverse the process; Rather than modifying a dozen styles? What would it take to create something like a "Subsection-v2" which would just use as counter the "thm" counter? Regards, Ramez === On 03/10/2017 23:16, Richard Heck wrote: On 10/03/2017 03:35 PM, rls wrote: Thank you for your reply. I have tried your suggestion verbatim (after correcting a couple of misprints): modifying "Local Layout". I don't really understand the details, See Ch 5 of the Customization manual again, and have a look at the file theorems-ams.inc, where the original definitions of these styles are. What we're adding to Local Layout is just modifying those definitions. The syntax takes a bit of getting used to, but it's not too bad, really. but I noticed one problem: - Inside a given section (say section 2), the theorem and lemma numbers are all displayed as "2.0". - The subsection numbers are displayed correctley - Printing gives correct results. Sorry, I hadn't tested. You need also to add: LabelString "Theorem \thesubsection." and similarly for lemmas. Note that, if you want to use things other than theorems and lemmas, you'll need to add similar modifications for those styles. You should also put, at the top of the Local Layout, "Format 60", that being the 2.2.x format. This will avoid any possible problems from LyX thinking you intend some other version. Richard
Re: AMS Article: need Theorems, and SUBSECTIONS to share counter.
On 10/03/2017 03:35 PM, rls wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
> I have tried your suggestion verbatim (after correcting a couple of
> misprints): modifying "Local Layout".
>
> I don't really understand the details,
See Ch 5 of the Customization manual again, and have a look at the file
theorems-ams.inc, where the original definitions of these styles are.
What we're adding to Local Layout is just modifying those definitions.
The syntax takes a bit of getting used to, but it's not too bad, really.
> but I noticed one problem:
> - Inside a given section (say section 2), the theorem and lemma
> numbers are all displayed as "2.0".
> - The subsection numbers are displayed correctley
> - Printing gives correct results.
Sorry, I hadn't tested. You need also to add:
LabelString "Theorem \thesubsection."
and similarly for lemmas. Note that, if you want to use things other
than theorems and lemmas, you'll need to add similar modifications for
those styles.
You should also put, at the top of the Local Layout, "Format 60", that
being the 2.2.x format. This will avoid any possible problems from LyX
thinking you intend some other version.
Richard
> =
> On 03/10/2017 17:15, Richard Heck wrote:
>>
>> The LyX display is controlled by 'layout' information, which is defined
>> in a number of places:
>>
>> (i) The layout file for the document class (e.g., amsart.layout)
>> (ii) Modules, which are to LyX as packages are to LaTeX (e.g.,
>> theorems-ams.module)
>> (iii) Document-specific "local" layout, found at Document> Settings>
>> Local Layout
>>
>> It seems to me as if you will probably be best off creating a new module
>> of your own, perhaps starting with and modifying theorems-ams.module.
>> Documentation concerning this is in Ch 5 of the Customization manual. As
>> far as the counters are concerned, you will want to modify the
>> LabelCounter defined for the various styles so that it uses the one for
>> subsections.
>>
>> Note that you can just make modifications in Local Layout, e.g.:
>>
>> Style Theorem
>> LabelCounter subsection
>> Preamble
>> \theoremstyle{plain}
>> \newtheorem{thm}[subsection]{\protect\theoremname}
>> EndPreamable
>> End
>> Style Lemma
>> LabelCounter subsection
>> Preamble
>> \theoremstyle{plain}
>> \newtheorem{lem}[subsection]{\protect\theoremname}
>> EndPreamable
>> End
>>
>> Then you could just use the usual Theorems (AMS) module, and these
>> modifications might be enough to get you what you want. But if you are
>> going to want to re-use them, then putting them in a module of their own
>> will make that easier.
>>
>> Richard
>
Re: AMS Article: need Theorems, and SUBSECTIONS to share counter.
Thank you for your reply.
I have tried your suggestion verbatim (after correcting a couple of
misprints): modifying "Local Layout".
I don't really understand the details, but I noticed one problem:
- Inside a given section (say section 2), the theorem and lemma numbers
are all displayed as "2.0".
- The subsection numbers are displayed correctley
- Printing gives correct results.
Any ideas? Thanks,
Ramez Labib Sami
=
On 03/10/2017 17:15, Richard Heck wrote:
The LyX display is controlled by 'layout' information, which is defined
in a number of places:
(i) The layout file for the document class (e.g., amsart.layout)
(ii) Modules, which are to LyX as packages are to LaTeX (e.g.,
theorems-ams.module)
(iii) Document-specific "local" layout, found at Document> Settings>
Local Layout
It seems to me as if you will probably be best off creating a new module
of your own, perhaps starting with and modifying theorems-ams.module.
Documentation concerning this is in Ch 5 of the Customization manual. As
far as the counters are concerned, you will want to modify the
LabelCounter defined for the various styles so that it uses the one for
subsections.
Note that you can just make modifications in Local Layout, e.g.:
Style Theorem
LabelCounter subsection
Preamble
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{thm}[subsection]{\protect\theoremname}
EndPreamable
End
Style Lemma
LabelCounter subsection
Preamble
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{lem}[subsection]{\protect\theoremname}
EndPreamable
End
Then you could just use the usual Theorems (AMS) module, and these
modifications might be enough to get you what you want. But if you are
going to want to re-use them, then putting them in a module of their own
will make that easier.
Richard
Re: AMS Article: need Theorems, and SUBSECTIONS to share counter.
On 10/03/2017 08:56 AM, rls wrote:
> I am Lyx beginner. Sorry if it's in the docs. Thanks in advance for
> your help.
>
> I need to have Theorems (and Lemmas, etc.) to share the same counter
> with subsectons.
>
> I can't find a way to do it with Lyx.
>
> === Example of Section 2, in a document
>
> 2. Reals simply defined ...[Section 2 title here]
>
> 2.1. Recall ... [1st subsection here]
>
> 2.2. Lemma. Any
>
> Proof. ...
>
> 2.3. Given f ... [2nd subsection here]
>
>
> Before using Lyx, I would just use the preamble:
>
> \documentclass[12pt]{amsart}
> \usepackage{amsmath}
>
> \swapnumbers
> \theoremstyle{plain}
> \newtheorem{theorem}[subsection]{Theorem}
> \newtheorem{proposition}[subsection]{Proposition}
> \newtheorem{lemma}[subsection]{Lemma}
> \newtheorem{corollary}[subsection]{Corollary}
> \newtheorem*{theoremNoNum}{Theorem}
> .
> ---
> I could include in the Lyx Document > Settings > LaTex Preamble, some
> hack to identify the two counters, like:
> \makeatletter
> \let\c@subsection\c@thm
> \makeatother
>
> But then, the numbers displayed in the Lyx editor aren't what's printed.
The LyX display is controlled by 'layout' information, which is defined
in a number of places:
(i) The layout file for the document class (e.g., amsart.layout)
(ii) Modules, which are to LyX as packages are to LaTeX (e.g.,
theorems-ams.module)
(iii) Document-specific "local" layout, found at Document> Settings>
Local Layout
It seems to me as if you will probably be best off creating a new module
of your own, perhaps starting with and modifying theorems-ams.module.
Documentation concerning this is in Ch 5 of the Customization manual. As
far as the counters are concerned, you will want to modify the
LabelCounter defined for the various styles so that it uses the one for
subsections.
Note that you can just make modifications in Local Layout, e.g.:
Style Theorem
LabelCounter subsection
Preamble
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{thm}[subsection]{\protect\theoremname}
EndPreamable
End
Style Lemma
LabelCounter subsection
Preamble
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{lem}[subsection]{\protect\theoremname}
EndPreamable
End
Then you could just use the usual Theorems (AMS) module, and these
modifications might be enough to get you what you want. But if you are
going to want to re-use them, then putting them in a module of their own
will make that easier.
Richard
AMS Article: need Theorems, and SUBSECTIONS to share counter.
I am Lyx beginner. Sorry if it's in the docs. Thanks in advance for your
help.
I need to have Theorems (and Lemmas, etc.) to share the same counter
with subsectons.
I can't find a way to do it with Lyx.
=== Example of Section 2, in a document
2. Reals simply defined ...[Section 2 title here]
2.1. Recall ... [1st subsection here]
2.2. Lemma. Any
Proof. ...
2.3. Given f ... [2nd subsection here]
Before using Lyx, I would just use the preamble:
\documentclass[12pt]{amsart}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\swapnumbers
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{theorem}[subsection]{Theorem}
\newtheorem{proposition}[subsection]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{lemma}[subsection]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}[subsection]{Corollary}
\newtheorem*{theoremNoNum}{Theorem}
.
---
I could include in the Lyx Document > Settings > LaTex Preamble, some
hack to identify the two counters, like:
\makeatletter
\let\c@subsection\c@thm
\makeatother
But then, the numbers displayed in the Lyx editor aren't what's printed.
--
Ramez Labib Sami
Université Paris-Diderot
Paros, France
Re: Adding new French item in Lyx to the AMS article set
Thanks Paul for your directions. I'll investigate that and come back then.
Re: Adding new French item in Lyx to the AMS article set
Thanks Paul for your directions. I'll investigate that and come back then.
Re: Adding new French item in Lyx to the AMS article set
Thanks Paul for your directions. I'll investigate that and come back then.
Adding new French item in Lyx to the AMS article set
Hello all ! I wish I could add Application to the available section beside Théorème (Theorem in English), Preuve(proof), ... The style, in Lyx and in Latex, should be identical to Note(Fact in English). What should I copy where to have the desired effect in both Lyx and Latex ? (I am a little confused by the different types of configuration files .module, .inc, .sty, etc. and by the cascade of definitions which must be meaningful and useful for some purpose.) Where should I put it so that the modifications will survive in the case of an update ? Thanks !
Re: Adding new French item in Lyx to the AMS article set
Assuming you intend instances of Application to be numbered, you could edit some or all of the theorem-related modules, adding a new theorem type named Application (along with a separate counter for it). The various theorem-related modules differ partly in how large a variety of theorem-like environments they provide (do they include Remark, Assumption, etc. or not?) and how numbering is done (globally, within sections, within environment types, ...). If you sometimes use one numbering system and sometimes another, and if you want Application defined in all systems you use, you will need to modify multiple modules. On the other hand, if you just want a single heading available named Application (no numbering, no special formatting of what follows, just something analogous to Proof but without the end-of-proof mark), I would suggest creating a brand new module for it. That way, you could combine that module with any of the theorem-related modules. However you handle it, you will want to put the modified file(s) in the layouts directory under your personal LyX directory. Look in Help About LyX for your User directory (typically ~/.lyx on Linux); there will be a layouts subdirectory under it. That will allow it to survive uninstall and reinstall episodes. For more details, refer to Help Customization (chapter 5). Paul
Adding new French item in Lyx to the AMS article set
Hello all ! I wish I could add Application to the available section beside Théorème (Theorem in English), Preuve(proof), ... The style, in Lyx and in Latex, should be identical to Note(Fact in English). What should I copy where to have the desired effect in both Lyx and Latex ? (I am a little confused by the different types of configuration files .module, .inc, .sty, etc. and by the cascade of definitions which must be meaningful and useful for some purpose.) Where should I put it so that the modifications will survive in the case of an update ? Thanks !
Re: Adding new French item in Lyx to the AMS article set
Assuming you intend instances of Application to be numbered, you could edit some or all of the theorem-related modules, adding a new theorem type named Application (along with a separate counter for it). The various theorem-related modules differ partly in how large a variety of theorem-like environments they provide (do they include Remark, Assumption, etc. or not?) and how numbering is done (globally, within sections, within environment types, ...). If you sometimes use one numbering system and sometimes another, and if you want Application defined in all systems you use, you will need to modify multiple modules. On the other hand, if you just want a single heading available named Application (no numbering, no special formatting of what follows, just something analogous to Proof but without the end-of-proof mark), I would suggest creating a brand new module for it. That way, you could combine that module with any of the theorem-related modules. However you handle it, you will want to put the modified file(s) in the layouts directory under your personal LyX directory. Look in Help About LyX for your User directory (typically ~/.lyx on Linux); there will be a layouts subdirectory under it. That will allow it to survive uninstall and reinstall episodes. For more details, refer to Help Customization (chapter 5). Paul
Adding new French item in Lyx to the AMS article set
Hello all ! I wish I could add "Application" to the available section beside "Théorème" (Theorem in English), "Preuve"(proof), ... The style, in Lyx and in Latex, should be identical to "Note"(Fact in English). What should I copy where to have the desired effect in both Lyx and Latex ? (I am a little confused by the different types of configuration files .module, .inc, .sty, etc. and by the cascade of definitions which must be meaningful and useful for some purpose.) Where should I put it so that the modifications will survive in the case of an update ? Thanks !
Re: Adding new French item in Lyx to the AMS article set
Assuming you intend instances of Application to be numbered, you could edit some or all of the theorem-related modules, adding a new theorem type named "Application" (along with a separate counter for it). The various theorem-related modules differ partly in how large a variety of theorem-like environments they provide (do they include Remark, Assumption, etc. or not?) and how numbering is done (globally, within sections, within environment types, ...). If you sometimes use one numbering system and sometimes another, and if you want Application defined in all systems you use, you will need to modify multiple modules. On the other hand, if you just want a single heading available named Application (no numbering, no special formatting of what follows, just something analogous to Proof but without the end-of-proof mark), I would suggest creating a brand new module for it. That way, you could combine that module with any of the theorem-related modules. However you handle it, you will want to put the modified file(s) in the "layouts" directory under your personal LyX directory. Look in Help > About LyX for your "User directory" (typically ~/.lyx on Linux); there will be a "layouts" subdirectory under it. That will allow it to survive uninstall and reinstall episodes. For more details, refer to Help > Customization (chapter 5). Paul
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Paul A. Rubin wrote: Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6123
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Neal Becker wrote: Paul A. Rubin wrote: Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6123 I've attached a hacked layout file and a couple of modules to the ticket. If you have not already fixed this yourself, you can download them to your local layouts directory, then reconfigure/restart LyX. /Paul
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Paul A. Rubin wrote: Neal Becker wrote: Paul A. Rubin wrote: Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6123 I've attached a hacked layout file and a couple of modules to the ticket. If you have not already fixed this yourself, you can download them to your local layouts directory, then reconfigure/restart LyX. /Paul Thanks!
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Paul A. Rubin wrote: Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6123
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Neal Becker wrote: Paul A. Rubin wrote: Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6123 I've attached a hacked layout file and a couple of modules to the ticket. If you have not already fixed this yourself, you can download them to your local layouts directory, then reconfigure/restart LyX. /Paul
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Paul A. Rubin wrote: Neal Becker wrote: Paul A. Rubin wrote: Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6123 I've attached a hacked layout file and a couple of modules to the ticket. If you have not already fixed this yourself, you can download them to your local layouts directory, then reconfigure/restart LyX. /Paul Thanks!
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: >> In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, >> 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? >> > > The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for > numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful > comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want > them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; > you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) > there. > > For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the > amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming > you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. > > Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line > from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want > numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. > > /Paul http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6123
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Neal Becker wrote: Paul A. Rubin wrote: Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6123 I've attached a hacked layout file and a couple of modules to the ticket. If you have not already fixed this yourself, you can download them to your local layouts directory, then reconfigure/restart LyX. /Paul
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: >> Paul A. Rubin wrote: >> >>> Neal Becker wrote: >>>> In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as >>>> 0.1, >>>> 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? >>>> >>> The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for >>> numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful >>> comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want >>> them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; >>> you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) >>> there. >>> >>> For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the >>> amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming >>> you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. >>> >>> Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line >>> from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want >>> numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. >>> >>> /Paul >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6123 >> > > I've attached a hacked layout file and a couple of modules to the > ticket. If you have not already fixed this yourself, you can download > them to your local layouts directory, then reconfigure/restart LyX. > > /Paul Thanks!
Eq numbering in ams article
In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that?
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul
Eq numbering in ams article
In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that?
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul
Eq numbering in ams article
In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that?
Re: Eq numbering in ams article
Neal Becker wrote: In ams article, if I don't put a \section, equations are numbered as 0.1, 0.2, etc. What can I do about that? The layout file is adding that (as well as the same convention for numbering figures) to the preamble. There's a somewhat unhelpful comment in the layout file to comment those lines out if you don't want them -- the catch being that you cannot comment them out in the LyX doc; you would have to export to LaTeX and comment them out (or delete them) there. For the nonce, about the best suggestion I have is to hack the amsart.layout file, remove either or both lines, and save it -- assuming you *never* want to number within sections when using AMS article. Personally, I think the correct approach would be to omit those line from the layout file and make an optional module for those who do want numbering within sections. You might want to file a bug report on this. /Paul
AMS article and sequential numbering
I've recently started using LyX 1.6.1 and discovered that my AMS article documents now all have sequential numbering of theorems and lemmas. In previous version one could choose between standard AMS article, and sequentially numbered, but now there is only one option. I searched the mail list archive and release notes, but have not found any discussion about this. Can somebody clarify the situation? Best regards, Alex
Re: AMS article and sequential numbering
A S wrote: I've recently started using LyX 1.6.1 and discovered that my AMS article documents now all have sequential numbering of theorems and lemmas. In previous version one could choose between standard AMS article, and sequentially numbered, but now there is only one option. I searched the mail list archive and release notes, but have not found any discussion about this. Can somebody clarify the situation? If you want to number by Chapter or by Section, load the Theorems (By Chapter) or Theorems (By Section) module, accordingly. rh
AMS article and sequential numbering
I've recently started using LyX 1.6.1 and discovered that my AMS article documents now all have sequential numbering of theorems and lemmas. In previous version one could choose between standard AMS article, and sequentially numbered, but now there is only one option. I searched the mail list archive and release notes, but have not found any discussion about this. Can somebody clarify the situation? Best regards, Alex
Re: AMS article and sequential numbering
A S wrote: I've recently started using LyX 1.6.1 and discovered that my AMS article documents now all have sequential numbering of theorems and lemmas. In previous version one could choose between standard AMS article, and sequentially numbered, but now there is only one option. I searched the mail list archive and release notes, but have not found any discussion about this. Can somebody clarify the situation? If you want to number by Chapter or by Section, load the Theorems (By Chapter) or Theorems (By Section) module, accordingly. rh
AMS article and sequential numbering
I've recently started using LyX 1.6.1 and discovered that my AMS article documents now all have sequential numbering of theorems and lemmas. In previous version one could choose between standard AMS article, and sequentially numbered, but now there is only one option. I searched the mail list archive and release notes, but have not found any discussion about this. Can somebody clarify the situation? Best regards, Alex
Re: AMS article and sequential numbering
A S wrote: I've recently started using LyX 1.6.1 and discovered that my AMS article documents now all have sequential numbering of theorems and lemmas. In previous version one could choose between standard AMS article, and sequentially numbered, but now there is only one option. I searched the mail list archive and release notes, but have not found any discussion about this. Can somebody clarify the situation? If you want to number by Chapter or by Section, load the "Theorems (By Chapter)" or "Theorems (By Section)" module, accordingly. rh
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. If it is just you being tired of working with KOMA, why not try other article classes and see which one fits your needs best? I quite like working with Memoir because it is very configurable and adaptable; it even has an article option to be behave like an article class. Its detailed configurability requires to read the very detailed manual first, though. Maksi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMS-article-tp16530986p16534389.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: Hostility and cynicism. A very nice way of answering a totally naive question. Good for you Mr. Heck. Sorry, that wasn't meant to be hostile or cynical. Maybe a smiley would have helped rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:35 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. Yes. You can re-write the class file. That's just how the AMS article is designed. There are lots of article classes. rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. If it is just you being tired of working with KOMA, why not try other article classes and see which one fits your needs best? I quite like working with Memoir because it is very configurable and adaptable; it even has an article option to be behave like an article class. Its detailed configurability requires to read the very detailed manual first, though. Maksi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMS-article-tp16530986p16534389.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: Hostility and cynicism. A very nice way of answering a totally naive question. Good for you Mr. Heck. Sorry, that wasn't meant to be hostile or cynical. Maybe a smiley would have helped rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:35 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. Yes. You can re-write the class file. That's just how the AMS article is designed. There are lots of article classes. rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: > Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the > Koma > article class. If it is just you being tired of working with KOMA, why not try other article classes and see which one fits your needs best? I quite like working with Memoir because it is very configurable and adaptable; it even has an article option to be behave like an article class. Its detailed configurability requires to read the very detailed manual first, though. Maksi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMS-article-tp16530986p16534389.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: Hostility and cynicism. A very nice way of answering a totally naive question. Good for you Mr. Heck. Sorry, that wasn't meant to be hostile or cynical. Maybe a smiley would have helped rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:35 PM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. Yes. You can re-write the class file. That's just how the AMS article is designed. There are lots of article classes. rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul
AMS article
I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul
Re: AMS article
Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. Yes. You can re-write the class file. That's just how the AMS article is designed. There are lots of article classes. rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul
Re: AMS article
Hostility and cynicism. A very nice way of answering a totally naive question. Good for you Mr. Heck. On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:35 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. Yes. You can re-write the class file. That's just how the AMS article is designed. There are lots of article classes. rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AMS article
I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul
Re: AMS article
Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. Yes. You can re-write the class file. That's just how the AMS article is designed. There are lots of article classes. rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul
Re: AMS article
Hostility and cynicism. A very nice way of answering a totally naive question. Good for you Mr. Heck. On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:35 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. Yes. You can re-write the class file. That's just how the AMS article is designed. There are lots of article classes. rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AMS article
I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul
Re: AMS article
Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Julio Rojas wrote: > > > I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and > > email > > are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why > > does > > this happen? > > > > > That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full > paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). > > /Paul > > -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AMS article
Julio Rojas wrote: Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the Koma article class. Yes. You can re-write the class file. That's just how the AMS article is designed. There are lots of article classes. rh On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Julio Rojas wrote: I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address and email are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why does this happen? That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second full paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). /Paul
Re: AMS article
Hostility and cynicism. A very nice way of answering a totally naive question. Good for you Mr. Heck. On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:35 PM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Julio Rojas wrote: > > > Ouch... Is there any way to change this? I'm tired of working with the > > Koma > > article class. > > > > > > > Yes. You can re-write the class file. That's just how the AMS article is > designed. > > There are lots of article classes. > > rh > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Julio Rojas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm having problems while working with an AMS article. The address > > > > and > > > > email > > > > are printed after the references section, not in the first page. Why > > > > does > > > > this happen? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's where the class is designed to put them (see page 5, second > > > full > > > paragraph, of instr-l.dvi, which comes with the class). > > > > > > /Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what happened to AMS article in 1.5.2?
I used to have no problem setting my documents to “article (AMS)” but with 1.5.2 I get an error message saying that the AMS article class layout isn’t usable, probably because a latex class is missing. I would check for the missing class if I knew where to look. How does Lyx know where to find Latex? Also, I heard there’s something you have to do to update MikTex or something. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.26/1120 - Release Date: 11/9/2007 9:26 AM
Re: what happened to AMS article in 1.5.2?
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote: I used to have no problem setting my documents to “article (AMS)” but with 1.5.2 I get an error message saying that the AMS article class layout isn’t usable, probably because a latex class is missing. I would check for the missing class if I knew where to look. At a DOS prompt, run 'kpsewhich amsart.cls'. It should tell you the path to the AMS article class (such as C:/Program Files/MiKTeX 2.6/tex/latex/amscls/amsart.cls). How does Lyx know where to find Latex? It expects the LaTeX (in this case MikTeX) bin directory to be on either you system command path or the the LyX path prefix (Tools - Preferences - Paths - PATH prefix). If it's not, article (AMS) won't be the only problem; you won't be able to use any classes, and probably won't be able to open the help files. Also, I heard there’s something you have to do to update MikTex or something. I doubt you would need to update MikTeX to use the latest AMS layouts, but it's generally a good idea to run MikTeX's update manager periodically. If kpsewhich finds the AMS article class file, check lyx root\Resources\layouts and make sure that amsart.layout is there. If so, maybe try to reconfigure and restart LyX. /Paul
what happened to AMS article in 1.5.2?
I used to have no problem setting my documents to “article (AMS)” but with 1.5.2 I get an error message saying that the AMS article class layout isn’t usable, probably because a latex class is missing. I would check for the missing class if I knew where to look. How does Lyx know where to find Latex? Also, I heard there’s something you have to do to update MikTex or something. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.26/1120 - Release Date: 11/9/2007 9:26 AM
Re: what happened to AMS article in 1.5.2?
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote: I used to have no problem setting my documents to “article (AMS)” but with 1.5.2 I get an error message saying that the AMS article class layout isn’t usable, probably because a latex class is missing. I would check for the missing class if I knew where to look. At a DOS prompt, run 'kpsewhich amsart.cls'. It should tell you the path to the AMS article class (such as C:/Program Files/MiKTeX 2.6/tex/latex/amscls/amsart.cls). How does Lyx know where to find Latex? It expects the LaTeX (in this case MikTeX) bin directory to be on either you system command path or the the LyX path prefix (Tools - Preferences - Paths - PATH prefix). If it's not, article (AMS) won't be the only problem; you won't be able to use any classes, and probably won't be able to open the help files. Also, I heard there’s something you have to do to update MikTex or something. I doubt you would need to update MikTeX to use the latest AMS layouts, but it's generally a good idea to run MikTeX's update manager periodically. If kpsewhich finds the AMS article class file, check lyx root\Resources\layouts and make sure that amsart.layout is there. If so, maybe try to reconfigure and restart LyX. /Paul
what happened to AMS article in 1.5.2?
I used to have no problem setting my documents to “article (AMS)” but with 1.5.2 I get an error message saying that the AMS article class layout isn’t usable, probably because a latex class is missing. I would check for the missing class if I knew where to look. How does Lyx know where to find Latex? Also, I heard there’s something you have to do to update MikTex or something. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.26/1120 - Release Date: 11/9/2007 9:26 AM
Re: what happened to AMS article in 1.5.2?
Srinivas Nedunuri wrote: I used to have no problem setting my documents to “article (AMS)” but with 1.5.2 I get an error message saying that the AMS article class layout isn’t usable, probably because a latex class is missing. I would check for the missing class if I knew where to look. At a DOS prompt, run 'kpsewhich amsart.cls'. It should tell you the path to the AMS article class (such as C:/Program Files/MiKTeX 2.6/tex/latex/amscls/amsart.cls). How does Lyx know where to find Latex? It expects the LaTeX (in this case MikTeX) bin directory to be on either you system command path or the the LyX path prefix (Tools -> Preferences -> Paths -> PATH prefix). If it's not, article (AMS) won't be the only problem; you won't be able to use any classes, and probably won't be able to open the help files. Also, I heard there’s something you have to do to update MikTex or something. I doubt you would need to update MikTeX to use the latest AMS layouts, but it's generally a good idea to run MikTeX's update manager periodically. If kpsewhich finds the AMS article class file, check root>\Resources\layouts and make sure that amsart.layout is there. If so, maybe try to reconfigure and restart LyX. /Paul
Only paragraph*, no paragraph in ams article?
Is it intentional that there is paragraph*, but not paragraph in ams article?
Only paragraph*, no paragraph in ams article?
Is it intentional that there is paragraph*, but not paragraph in ams article?
Only paragraph*, no paragraph in ams article?
Is it intentional that there is paragraph*, but not paragraph in ams article?
Re: Contiguous definitions in AMS article
David L. Johnson wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800 Adrian Robson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this? I always put a % in ERT (change to standard mode) between them. No need to change what you write to accomodate the software In fact, the ERT can be left empty. /Paul
Re: Contiguous definitions in AMS article
David L. Johnson wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800 Adrian Robson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this? I always put a % in ERT (change to standard mode) between them. No need to change what you write to accomodate the software In fact, the ERT can be left empty. /Paul
Re: Contiguous definitions in AMS article
David L. Johnson wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800 "Adrian Robson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this? I always put a % in ERT (change to standard mode) between them. No need to change what you write to accomodate the software In fact, the ERT can be left empty. /Paul
Contiguous definitions in AMS article
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this?
Re: Contiguous definitions in AMS article
You can just put some ERT there, too. Even a LaTeX comment: %whatever. It's true that there should be a better way. Richard Adrian Robson wrote: I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this? -- == Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://bobjweil.com/heck/ == Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at: http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
Re: Contiguous definitions in AMS article
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800 Adrian Robson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this? I always put a % in ERT (change to standard mode) between them. No need to change what you write to accomodate the software -- David L. Johnson __o | It is a scientifically proven fact that a mid life crisis can _`\(,_ | only be cured by something racy and Italian. Bianchis and (_)/ (_) | Colnagos are a lot cheaper than Maserattis and Ferraris. -- Glenn Davies
Contiguous definitions in AMS article
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this?
Re: Contiguous definitions in AMS article
You can just put some ERT there, too. Even a LaTeX comment: %whatever. It's true that there should be a better way. Richard Adrian Robson wrote: I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this? -- == Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://bobjweil.com/heck/ == Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at: http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
Re: Contiguous definitions in AMS article
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800 Adrian Robson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this? I always put a % in ERT (change to standard mode) between them. No need to change what you write to accomodate the software -- David L. Johnson __o | It is a scientifically proven fact that a mid life crisis can _`\(,_ | only be cured by something racy and Italian. Bianchis and (_)/ (_) | Colnagos are a lot cheaper than Maserattis and Ferraris. -- Glenn Davies
Contiguous definitions in AMS article
I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way to do this?
Re: Contiguous definitions in AMS article
You can just put some ERT there, too. Even a LaTeX comment: %whatever. It's true that there should be a better way. Richard Adrian Robson wrote: > I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) > in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single > definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything > works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way > to do this? > -- == Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://bobjweil.com/heck/ == Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at: http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
Re: Contiguous definitions in AMS article
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800 "Adrian Robson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want two successive numbered definitions (using the definition environment) > in an AMS article. Lyx, however, insists on consolidating them into a single > definition. If I force some standard text between the two, then everything > works fine, but this is an awkward workaround. Does anyone know a btter way > to do this? I always put a % in ERT (change to standard mode) between them. No need to change what you write to accomodate the software -- David L. Johnson __o | It is a scientifically proven fact that a mid life crisis can _`\(,_ | only be cured by something racy and Italian. Bianchis and (_)/ (_) | Colnagos are a lot cheaper than Maserattis and Ferraris. -- Glenn Davies
Re: problems wiht AMS article
Marcelo == Marcelo Acuña [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcelo Hello, I am writing a work in mathematics with AMS article. I
Marcelo put \usepackage[spanish]{babel} in preamble. In main screen
Marcelo in Lyx all OK. Appears Corolario instead Corollary, Teorema
Marcelo instead Theorem, etc. But in output all titles appears in
Marcelo English. How I can get titles in Spanish?
This is unfortunately something that does not work yet:
* LaTeX/babel itself does not provide such translations. It would be
reasonable to have a \corollaryname macro that we can use for the
definition of the environment, but alas it does not exist.
* LyX does not have a mechanism to translate some strings in its macro
definitions. Note that it would not be very easy to do.
JMarc
Re: problems wiht AMS article
Marcelo == Marcelo Acuña [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcelo Hello, I am writing a work in mathematics with AMS article. I
Marcelo put \usepackage[spanish]{babel} in preamble. In main screen
Marcelo in Lyx all OK. Appears Corolario instead Corollary, Teorema
Marcelo instead Theorem, etc. But in output all titles appears in
Marcelo English. How I can get titles in Spanish?
This is unfortunately something that does not work yet:
* LaTeX/babel itself does not provide such translations. It would be
reasonable to have a \corollaryname macro that we can use for the
definition of the environment, but alas it does not exist.
* LyX does not have a mechanism to translate some strings in its macro
definitions. Note that it would not be very easy to do.
JMarc
Re: problems wiht AMS article
>>>>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Acuña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcelo> Hello, I am writing a work in mathematics with AMS article. I
Marcelo> put \usepackage[spanish]{babel} in preamble. In main screen
Marcelo> in Lyx all OK. Appears Corolario instead Corollary, Teorema
Marcelo> instead Theorem, etc. But in output all titles appears in
Marcelo> English. How I can get titles in Spanish?
This is unfortunately something that does not work yet:
* LaTeX/babel itself does not provide such translations. It would be
reasonable to have a \corollaryname macro that we can use for the
definition of the environment, but alas it does not exist.
* LyX does not have a mechanism to translate some strings in its macro
definitions. Note that it would not be very easy to do.
JMarc
problems wiht AMS article
Hello,
I am writing a work in mathematics with AMS article.
I put \usepackage[spanish]{babel} in preamble.
In main screen in Lyx all OK.
Appears Corolario instead Corollary, Teorema instead Theorem, etc.
But in output all titles appears in English.
How I can get titles in Spanish?
Thanks
Marcelo
__
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
problems wiht AMS article
Hello,
I am writing a work in mathematics with AMS article.
I put \usepackage[spanish]{babel} in preamble.
In main screen in Lyx all OK.
Appears Corolario instead Corollary, Teorema instead Theorem, etc.
But in output all titles appears in English.
How I can get titles in Spanish?
Thanks
Marcelo
__
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
problems wiht AMS article
Hello,
I am writing a work in mathematics with AMS article.
I put \usepackage[spanish]{babel} in preamble.
In main screen in Lyx all OK.
Appears Corolario instead Corollary, Teorema instead Theorem, etc.
But in output all titles appears in English.
How I can get titles in Spanish?
Thanks
Marcelo
__
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
Re: ams article defect
Neal == Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is your babel version? Neal 2004/11/20 v3.8d Version 3.8h is from 23/11/2005. Your version would not be a problem with an older amsart, I guess. JMarc
Re: ams article defect
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote: To: David L. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: ams article defect From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:00:46 +0100 David == David L Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] David LaTeX2e 2003/12/01 Babel v3.8d I think you need at least version 3.8g or 3.8h. Or an older amsart :) The fact is, there are distributions out there that package the two incompatible packages. This should probably be reported as a teTeX bug via debian, if this is not done already. It might come from two tetex subpackages not being in sync. Upgrade is advisable before reporting I guess. You might install texlive if the problem remains. The texlive packaging has been reviewed before it entered Debian/etch in june, and texlive|tetex have been made equivalent in LyX dependencies. I'm running on Fedora FC6 and everything is up to date. Fedora will move to texlive and I'm looking forward to that - but I don't want to screw things up in the meantime. If anyone knows where to find a new babel.sty let me know. Search on ctan wasn't very useful.
Re: ams article defect
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org From: Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ams article defect Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:07:48 -0500 Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote: [...] If anyone knows where to find a new babel.sty let me know. Search on ctan wasn't very useful. babel.sty is hidden inside files babel.dtx and babel.ins, just download and run latex on these. -- Jean-Pierre
Re: ams article defect
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:00:49 +0100 (MET) Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It might come from two tetex subpackages not being in sync. Upgrade is advisable before reporting I guess. Well, debian's package descriptions don't explicitly list which versions of babel and amsart are used, but as far as I could see the difference between the testing version which I have been using, and the unstable version, which is newer, is only a minor-number version change. You might install texlive if the problem remains. The texlive packaging has been reviewed before it entered Debian/etch in june, and texlive|tetex have been made equivalent in LyX dependencies. Just installed it. This replaces the tetex distribution. texlive definitely fixes the problem, and it is also a screamingly fast-compiling tex. Very nice. Thanks for the suggestion. This beats trying to upgrade just a piece of the tex distribution by snagging archives from CTAN, which for all I know would screw something else up. -- David L. Johnson __o | And what if you track down these men and kill them, what if you _`\(,_ | killed all of us? From every corner of Europe, hundreds, (_)/ (_) | thousands would rise up to take our places. Even Nazis can't kill that fast. -- Paul Henreid (Casablanca).
Re: ams article defect
Neal == Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is your babel version? Neal 2004/11/20 v3.8d Version 3.8h is from 23/11/2005. Your version would not be a problem with an older amsart, I guess. JMarc
Re: ams article defect
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote: To: David L. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: ams article defect From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:00:46 +0100 David == David L Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] David LaTeX2e 2003/12/01 Babel v3.8d I think you need at least version 3.8g or 3.8h. Or an older amsart :) The fact is, there are distributions out there that package the two incompatible packages. This should probably be reported as a teTeX bug via debian, if this is not done already. It might come from two tetex subpackages not being in sync. Upgrade is advisable before reporting I guess. You might install texlive if the problem remains. The texlive packaging has been reviewed before it entered Debian/etch in june, and texlive|tetex have been made equivalent in LyX dependencies. I'm running on Fedora FC6 and everything is up to date. Fedora will move to texlive and I'm looking forward to that - but I don't want to screw things up in the meantime. If anyone knows where to find a new babel.sty let me know. Search on ctan wasn't very useful.
Re: ams article defect
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org From: Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ams article defect Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:07:48 -0500 Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote: [...] If anyone knows where to find a new babel.sty let me know. Search on ctan wasn't very useful. babel.sty is hidden inside files babel.dtx and babel.ins, just download and run latex on these. -- Jean-Pierre
Re: ams article defect
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:00:49 +0100 (MET) Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It might come from two tetex subpackages not being in sync. Upgrade is advisable before reporting I guess. Well, debian's package descriptions don't explicitly list which versions of babel and amsart are used, but as far as I could see the difference between the testing version which I have been using, and the unstable version, which is newer, is only a minor-number version change. You might install texlive if the problem remains. The texlive packaging has been reviewed before it entered Debian/etch in june, and texlive|tetex have been made equivalent in LyX dependencies. Just installed it. This replaces the tetex distribution. texlive definitely fixes the problem, and it is also a screamingly fast-compiling tex. Very nice. Thanks for the suggestion. This beats trying to upgrade just a piece of the tex distribution by snagging archives from CTAN, which for all I know would screw something else up. -- David L. Johnson __o | And what if you track down these men and kill them, what if you _`\(,_ | killed all of us? From every corner of Europe, hundreds, (_)/ (_) | thousands would rise up to take our places. Even Nazis can't kill that fast. -- Paul Henreid (Casablanca).
Re: ams article defect
> "Neal" == Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What is your babel version? Neal> 2004/11/20 v3.8d Version 3.8h is from 23/11/2005. Your version would not be a problem with an older amsart, I guess. JMarc
Re: ams article defect
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote: > >>>To: "David L. Johnson" >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: >>>lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: ams >>>article defect From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:00:46 >>>+0100 >>> >>>>>>>> "David" == David L Johnson >>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] >>> >>>David> LaTeX2e <2003/12/01> Babel >>> >>>I think you need at least version 3.8g or 3.8h. Or an older amsart :) >>>The fact is, there are distributions out there that package the two >>>incompatible packages. This should probably be reported as a teTeX bug >>>via debian, if this is not done already. > > It might come from two tetex subpackages not being in sync. > Upgrade is advisable before reporting I guess. > > You might install texlive if the problem remains. The texlive packaging > has been reviewed before it entered Debian/etch in june, and texlive|tetex > have been made equivalent in LyX dependencies. > I'm running on Fedora FC6 and everything is up to date. Fedora will move to texlive and I'm looking forward to that - but I don't want to screw things up in the meantime. If anyone knows where to find a new babel.sty let me know. Search on ctan wasn't very useful.
Re: ams article defect
>>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org >>From: Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Re: ams article defect >>Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:07:48 -0500 >> >>Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote: [...] >> >>If anyone knows where to find a new babel.sty let me know. Search on ctan >>wasn't very useful. >> babel.sty is hidden inside files babel.dtx and babel.ins, just download and run latex on these. -- Jean-Pierre
Re: ams article defect
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:00:49 +0100 (MET) Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It might come from two tetex subpackages not being in sync. > Upgrade is advisable before reporting I guess. Well, debian's package descriptions don't explicitly list which versions of babel and amsart are used, but as far as I could see the difference between the "testing" version which I have been using, and the "unstable" version, which is newer, is only a minor-number version change. > > You might install texlive if the problem remains. The texlive packaging has > been reviewed before it entered Debian/etch in june, and texlive|tetex > have been made equivalent in LyX dependencies. Just installed it. This replaces the tetex distribution. texlive definitely fixes the problem, and it is also a screamingly fast-compiling tex. Very nice. Thanks for the suggestion. This beats trying to upgrade just a piece of the tex distribution by snagging archives from CTAN, which for all I know would screw something else up. -- David L. Johnson __o | And what if you track down these men and kill them, what if you _`\(,_ | killed all of us? From every corner of Europe, hundreds, (_)/ (_) | thousands would rise up to take our places. Even Nazis can't kill that fast. -- Paul Henreid (Casablanca).
ams article defect
I recall hitting this problem once before, but I forgot what the fix was. I'm using ams article. The output has a header that says: englishMyTitle instead of MyTitle
Re: ams article defect
Neal == Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Neal I recall hitting this problem once before, but I forgot what the Neal fix was. I'm using ams article. The output has a header that Neal says: englishMyTitle instead of MyTitle You should upgrade your version of babel.sty, or use an older version of amsart.cls. JMarc
Re: ams article defect
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:55:44 -0500 Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recall hitting this problem once before, but I forgot what the fix was. I'm using ams article. The output has a header that says: englishMyTitle instead of MyTitle Yeah, I have this problem, too, and have had through several system updates. It was explained to me on this list that it is a LaTeX issue, not a LyX one. Specifically, it is a problem with babel. Supposedly, new versions of babel (and/or amslatex) fix this, but I am not so sure, since I use debian etch which has fairly new versions of those packages. My current workaround is to export the TeX file, then comment out the babel package. It then seems to work correctly. -- David L. Johnson __o | Accept risk. Accept responsibility. Put a lawyer out of _`\(,_ | business. (_)/ (_) |
