Yeah WTF ?wasted my bandwidth on this ?Couldn't even finish it
Even if my religion is still to be decided i would have chosen in
these difficult time :
Revelation13:18 -He who has understanding, let him calculate the
number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is six
hundred
Selon Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anyone can reproduce this, because I did not find the cause of this
issue yet...
OK, more info about this.
# cd /usr
# cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs -q co -P www
[...] # = checkout without any error
# cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs -q up -Pd www
Dear all
i have 2 router like bellow:
internet--router1route2--lan
detail :
1. router1
interface internet = 192.168.0.10/24
gw = 192.168.0.2
interface to router2= 192.168.1.10 /24
2. router2
interface to router1 = 192.168.1.11/24
gw = 192.168.0.10
interface to lan=
yes i have enable ip forwarding to 1
# sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
On 5/22/06, Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Did you enable ip forwarding on your routers?
Like this:
#sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
To make it permanent change it in
/etc/sysctl.conf
On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
I have a simpler question: is there any plan to make installing
xbase a requirement in the foreseeable future?
no. nothing in {base,comp,man,misc,game,etc}XX.tgz depends on
sonjaya wrote:
Dear all
i have 2 router like bellow:
internet--router1route2--lan
detail :
1. router1
interface internet = 192.168.0.10/24
gw = 192.168.0.2
interface to router2= 192.168.1.10 /24
2. router2
interface to router1 = 192.168.1.11/24
gw = 192.168.0.10
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:27, Liviu Daia wrote:
Ok, let me rephrase this. How realistic will be to run an OpenBSD
firewall or router without xbase a few years from now?
Very, in my opinion.
With the release of 3.9, there seems to be a new trend among port
maintainers to make running
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Selon Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anyone can reproduce this, because I did not find the cause of this
issue yet...
OK, more info about this.
# cd /usr
# cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs -q co -P www
[...] # = checkout without any
On 22 May 2006, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:27, Liviu Daia wrote:
Ok, let me rephrase this. How realistic will be to run an
OpenBSD firewall or router without xbase a few years from now?
Very, in my opinion.
With the release of 3.9, there seems
* Liviu Daia wrote:
The consistent answer I got on ports@ was that it has been decided
that installing X is not a showstopper, and a number of personal
attacks for suggesting otherwise. :-) Which is why I'm now asking if
this is the official position.
Yes, that _is_ the official
On 22 May 2006, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Liviu Daia wrote:
The consistent answer I got on ports@ was that it has been
decided that installing X is not a showstopper, and a number of
personal attacks for suggesting otherwise. :-) Which is why I'm now
asking if this is
sonjaya wrote:
i have 2 router like bellow:
internet--router1route2--lan
detail :
1. router1
interface internet = 192.168.0.10/24
gw = 192.168.0.2
interface to router2= 192.168.1.10 /24
2. router2
interface to router1 = 192.168.1.11/24
gw = 192.168.0.10
interface to
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:18PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
I have a simpler question: is there any plan to make installing
xbase a requirement in the foreseeable
I have used lynx for years as a file browser as well as web browser
(when I can) and it is routine for me to fix /etc/lynx.conf to show
me dotfiles.
Recently I need to inspect lots of text files and sometimes edit a few
so I set vi to be the system editor for lynx. So far so good.
When editing
On 22/05/06, Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sonjaya wrote:
[cut]
i have set all router like this :
- all PF is disable
- in rc.conf i set = routed=-q
Also, the setting in /etc/rc.conf (or in /etc/rc.conf.local) is
routed_flags, not routed...
Be well,
Andreas
--
Andreas Kahari
On 22 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:18PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
I have a simpler question: is there any plan to make
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/lynx/src/LYEdit.c
calls in edit_temporary_file():
char *editor_arg = ;
...
format = %s +%s%s %s;
HTAddXpand(command, format, params++, editor);
HTAddParam(command, format, params++, position);
HTAddParam(command, format, params++,
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:18PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
I have a simpler question: is there any plan to make installing
xbase a
In /usr/src/usr.bin/vi/common/main.c:
...
* Change + into -c$.
...
if (argv[0][0] == '+') {
if (argv[0][1] == '\0') {
argv[0] = strdup(-c$);
On 5/22/06, Alexander Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
I have used lynx for years as a file browser as well as web browser
(when I can) and it is routine for me to fix /etc/lynx.conf to show
me dotfiles.
Recently I need to inspect lots of text files and sometimes edit a few
so I set vi to be the system editor for lynx.
Hi ,
I plan to install Openbsd3.9 on HP DL140 G2 machine.
Is this machine Compatible with OpenBSD 3.9 ?
Regards
Unni
Liviu Daia [2006-05-22, 12:27:18]:
Ok, let me rephrase this. How realistic will be to run an OpenBSD
firewall or router without xbase a few years from now?
Huh? You do not and will not need xbase to run a firewall/router.
With the release of 3.9, there seems to be a new trend among
Hi all,
I've followed a set of instructions[1] describing a method of
installing OpenBSD onto a RAID 1 array created with raidctl using only
2 disks (sd0b + sd1b). The basic premise is to first install normally
onto one disk (sd0b) and then created a degraded RAID 1 array using
the second disk
On 2006/05/22 14:42, steven mestdagh wrote:
Clearly, this no_x11 stuff has a low priority.
The error message could use work though;
Can't install gd-2.0.33p2: lib not found fontconfig.3.0
Even by looking in the dependency tree:
jpeg-6bp3, png-1.2.8, libiconv-1.9.2p3
Maybe it's in a dependent
Hi Paul,
On 2006-05-22T14:14, Paul Wright wrote:
Hi all,
I've followed a set of instructions[1] describing a method of
installing OpenBSD onto a RAID 1 array created with raidctl using only
2 disks (sd0b + sd1b). The basic premise is to first install normally
onto one disk (sd0b) and then
On 22/05/06, Marcus Popp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 2006-05-22T14:14, Paul Wright wrote:
Hi all,
I've followed a set of instructions[1] describing a method of
installing OpenBSD onto a RAID 1 array created with raidctl using only
2 disks (sd0b + sd1b). The basic premise is to
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
I've got a server that has been running fine with a bsd.mp kernel
from Apr 23. I took it up to -current on May 19th and it threw a panic on
boot. I booted from the old kernel and it was fine, so I cvsuped the
source and built -current again. Same
On 22 May 2006, steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Liviu Daia [2006-05-22, 12:27:18]:
Ok, let me rephrase this. How realistic will be to run an
OpenBSD firewall or router without xbase a few years from now?
Huh? You do not and will not need xbase to run a firewall/router.
On Monday 22 May 2006 Liviu Daia wrote:
On 22 May 2006, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:27, Liviu Daia wrote:
Ok, let me rephrase this. How realistic will be to run an
OpenBSD firewall or router without xbase a few years from now?
Extremely realistic.
On 22 May 2006, Can Erkin Acar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 Liviu Daia wrote:
On 22 May 2006, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:27, Liviu Daia wrote:
Ok, let me rephrase this. How realistic will be to run an
OpenBSD firewall or
it solved when i installed new n fresh .
and the thread closed , thx for all respond
my regard's for all
On 5/22/06, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/05/06, Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sonjaya wrote:
[cut]
i have set all router like this :
- all PF is disable
On Monday 22 May 2006 13:51, Unnikrishnan, Puthanveetil wrote:
Hi ,
I plan to install Openbsd3.9 on HP DL140 G2 machine.
Is this machine Compatible with OpenBSD 3.9 ?
Regards
Unni
We have four HP DL140 G2 machines running on 3.7 at a customer site (dns and
mail relays) without any
my reply to this thread has no references b/c most of the prior stuff is
irrelevant to the contents of this reply.
the reason nobody wants to accomodate liviu is that it takes WORK, namely other
people's valuable time that could be spent working on code that 1 person is
agitating about. in all
On 22 May 2006, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my reply to this thread has no references b/c most of the prior stuff
is irrelevant to the contents of this reply.
the reason nobody wants to accomodate liviu is that it takes WORK,
namely other people's valuable time that could be
Hi,
I'm updating packages half years old (don't remeber exacly) to
3.9-release packages on system (that was -current system).
$ dmesg | head -n2
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #615: Tue Feb 28 20:41:06 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
and it's finish with below
I setup a new PPC box with Openbsd 3.9. After the install I dl'd and compiled
apache 2.0.58, mysql 5.21 and php 5.1. I got the box setup and running.
Everything seemed to be working just fine. I did some testing of the php
application (phpBB) and everything seemed to work just fine. So, I
On 2006/05/22 10:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am confused on which way to go here.
How about using httpd from base, and php from ports?
Porters have put a lot of time into making it all Just Work.
Watch out you keep that phpBB up-to-date, whichever
way you go.
On May 22, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/05/22 10:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am confused on which way to go here.
How about using httpd from base, and php from ports?
Porters have put a lot of time into making it all Just Work.
Watch out you keep that phpBB
The problem with the ports version of php, and I did try that the first time I
setup the box, was the dependency list was huge and it installed a whole bunch
of stuff that I didn't really need/want. The php install took almost a full
day of downloading/compliling and installing applications.
Hi everybody,
I am still trying to sort out some of the information on the OpenBSD website
about how to follow a specific branch and what are the benefits of each
method.
I understood what STABLE, CURRENT and RELEASE are and how to follow them.
I still have some difficulties figuring out what
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 07:21:33PM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
I guess the best solution would be to follow stable but speaking honestly
this seems like a lot of wasted bandwidth and CPU time for a few small
changes at best?
Best depends on many things. ;) I follow stable on my production
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
I can reproduce this with anoncvs3, but anoncvs.uk.openbsd.org works
ok for me. The main cvs repository is also ok.
Allright, thanks!
It's good to know I was not alone. I guess I tried the wrong mirrors
then...
Regards,
--
Antoine
Then, you've selected the wrong package, I had no dependencies for php-core.
In fact that's the only extra package I have besides base on one of my
servers, and everything runs smoothly.
On Monday 22 May 2006 19:14, you wrote:
The problem with the ports version of php, and I did try that the
On 2006/05/22 11:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with the ports version of php, and I did try that
the first time I setup the box, was the dependency list was huge
On OpenBSD, ports are mostly there to build packages, rather than for
typical software-installation. As such the php port
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:15:02PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
(1) My question was about the official policy. When / if I'm pointed to
a written form of that policy (which is basically what I'm asking
for), I might consider submitting a patch to it. :-)
You have received many replies
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:22:21PM +0200, Per-Olov Sjoholm wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 13:51, Unnikrishnan, Puthanveetil wrote:
Hi ,
I plan to install Openbsd3.9 on HP DL140 G2 machine.
Is this machine Compatible with OpenBSD 3.9 ?
Regards
Unni
We have four HP DL140 G2
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem with the ports version of php, and I did try that
the first time I setup the box, was the dependency list was
huge and it installed a whole bunch of stuff that I didn't
really need/want. The php install took almost a full day of
downloading/compliling
Paul Wright writes:
Hi all,
I've followed a set of instructions[1] describing a method of
installing OpenBSD onto a RAID 1 array created with raidctl using only
2 disks (sd0b + sd1b). The basic premise is to first install normally
onto one disk (sd0b) and then created a degraded RAID 1
On 5/22/06, Tobias Weisserth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Starting with 2.7, OpenBSD provides a source tree that contains important
patches and fixes (i.e. those from the errata plus others which are obvious
and simple, but do not deserve an errata entry) and makes it available via
CVS in addition
After upgrading by hand every package I found problem which result with
error in my previous post:
# ls -al /var/db/pkg/ | grep atk
drwxr-xr-x2 root wheel 512 Feb 2 12:57 .libs-atk-1.10.3p0
drwxr-xr-x2 root wheel 512 May 22 19:00 atk-1.10.1
# pkg_add -rvi atk-1.10.3p1
Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/05/22 05:39, Raja Subramanian wrote:
The vlan(4) man page does not mention this chip. I googled, and
grepped through /usr/src/sys, but could not arrive at a conclusion.
If the IFCAP_VLAN_MTU capability is set on a vlan parent, vlan assumes
Hi all,
I'm developing a small program that uses an assembly routine. It is
compiled and executed normally. But I've done some changes in the
routine, more specifically changing the system calls, such as write,
by libc functions, such as fprintf and exit. Then everytime I try to
run the program
On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:21:33 +0200, Tobias Weisserth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still trying to sort out some of the information on the OpenBSD website
about how to follow a specific branch and what are the benefits of each
method.
I understood what STABLE, CURRENT and RELEASE are and how
I'm currently using a table with pf redirects.
rdr pass on X_if proto tcp from any to Y_ip port {80,443} - tableQ
round-robin sticky-address
and it's working fine. The only issue is when I delete an entry from that
table some connections still continue to try and hit that destination ip.
Is
Tobias Weisserth wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am still trying to sort out some of the information on the OpenBSD website
about how to follow a specific branch and what are the benefits of each
method.
I understood what STABLE, CURRENT and RELEASE are and how to follow them.
I still have some
Hi guys, just a quick question.
During some toying with pf I noticed something. When making a comment
like the following:
.
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
.
is it expected behavior that pfctl
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:52:59PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 22 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:18PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:40:47PM +0200, Paulo Rodriguez wrote:
.
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
.
is it expected behavior that pfctl complains about a space after the
backslash,
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 08:35:35AM +0600, Anton Maksimenkov wrote:
Aside from the other comments, I'll add that aac(4) was disabled because
it was buggy and Adaptec wouldn't provide documentation.
Theo was quite clear about this at the time, see the 3.8 release notes.
Ok, I remember about
.
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
.
is it expected behavior that pfctl complains about a space after the
backslash, DESPITE the line being a comment?
Or is there a good reason
could we now close this thread and go back to work?
Hello,
For those enjoying FreeBSD's jail utility, we're pleased to announce a
user-space implementation for OpenBSD (using systrace.4).
http://sysjail.bsd.lv
From the introduction:
``sysjail is a userland virtualisation system for operating systems
supporting the systrace library. It is
On 5/22/06, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i would think the good reason is that the line is not a comment
as you imagine, but would effectively turn into:
I disagree. I think this is a bug in all these lexers, and we should
fix it.
\ret is the only special case that says ignore
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:07:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
[...]
i would think the good reason is that the line is not a comment
as you imagine, but would effectively turn into:
[...]
\ret is the only
On 22 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:52:59PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 22 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:18PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/22/06, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm developing a small program that uses an assembly routine. It is
compiled and executed normally. But I've done some changes in the
routine, more specifically changing the system calls, such as write,
by libc functions, such as fprintf and
Hi All,
I'm having a hell of a time trying to get this Dell Latitude D620 to
run at 1440x900 resolution. Dimitry Andric's recent 945GM patches got
me closer (no more Xorg BusID errors) but I still can't get 1440x900
going. I'm using the 915resolution port to patch BIOS mode 5a to
1440x900x24
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:07:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
[...]
i would think the good reason is that the line is not a comment
as you imagine, but would effectively turn into:
[...]
I disagree. I think this is a bug in all these lexers, and we should
fix it.
\ret is the only special case that says ignore both. In any other
case \c should translate into just the character c.
This \whitespace special case it is an errors that a few people
will make, so fail when we
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:07:14PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
[...]
i would think the good reason is that the line is not a comment
as you imagine, but would effectively turn into:
[...]
\ret is the only
Hi list,
I'm going to attempt to word this carefully as I'm looking for a
non-flame debate on the merits of PHP, Mason, Ruby, and JSP/Tomcat.
I have googled about extensively and similar threads seem to end up
with various posters slinging mud and then licking wounds. Not my
intention. An
http://saba.island.nu/openbsd/Xorg.0.log.txt
First of all, are you sure your screen is really 1440x900? The driver
thinks not:
(II) I810(0): Display Info: LFP (local flat panel): attached: TRUE,
present: TRUE, size: (1280,800)
...
(II) I810(0): Lowest common panel size for pipe B is 1280 x
On 5/22/06, Christopher Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a hell of a time trying to get this Dell Latitude D620 to
run at 1440x900 resolution. Dimitry Andric's recent 945GM patches got
me closer (no more Xorg BusID errors) [...]
Doh. I researched Dell's site and noticed that two
Hello,
I just received my newly purchased copy of OpenBSD/i386 3.9 and tried to install
it on my Compaq R3140US laptop. Unfortunately it freezes when booting the
install CD (see below for output). I searched on the web for a solution, but the
only thing I found was Jeff's extremely similar
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:53:27PM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
*) Mason
- not practical in chroot without half of CPAN, so what is the point?
I am leaning towards Mason behind a reverse Squid proxy
I would think that if you use mason with mod_perl[1] instead of running
it as a CGI, you don't
What most ports (at least gd/php and maybe tk) need from X11 is nothing more
than libfreetype
My simple solution is to copy /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.X.X from
a box with X11 to the server without X11. Just copy it to /usr/local/lib
and everything works.
I mean, you could make libs into its
On 5/22/06, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm worried about data driven HTTP attacks getting past the reverse
Squid proxy on the bastion host and into the LAN server, especially via
HTTPS when contents are not examined so well.
Just curious, why aren't you looking at apache for
Joachim Schipper wrote:
OpenBSD has an isp(4) driver, as 'man isp' will tell you. Nothing
obviously ServeRAIDish in there, though.
FreeBSD's ServeRAID driver is ips, not isp. isp is for QLogic controllers.
I had to replace a Netgear FA311 with a newer version of the same card.
Unfortunately this card is now a rl(4), not a sis(4) anymore.
dmesg for the old version:
sis0 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 NS DP83815 10/100 rev 0x00: DP83815D, irq
10, address 00:02:e3:12:7b:9c
nsphyter0 at sis0 phy 0: DP83815
this is not openbsd specific, but i wanted to ask people who really understand
the inner workings of programming languages.
suppose that you have 2 conditions A and B where B take a lot of effort to
determine (eg looking for a string match in a huge file).
either A or B needs to be true before
Thank you all for clarifying this, guys. I'll give you feedback on the
diff when I try it out.
Theo de Raadt schreef:
.
# pas on re0 from any \ #
# to any port 59#
.
is it expected behavior that pfctl
On 5/22/06, prad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is not openbsd specific, but i wanted to ask people who really understand
the inner workings of programming languages.
suppose that you have 2 conditions A and B where B take a lot of effort to
determine (eg looking for a string match in a huge
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_evaluation
Best
Martin
Original message from prad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
suppose that you have 2 conditions A and B where B take a lot of effort to
determine (eg looking for a string match in a huge file).
either A or B needs to be true before you can execute 'this'.
the 2 if statements below are equivalent i
Sorry if I did not get smth right, but
src/sys/arch/i386/include/cputypes.h
or
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/arch/i386/include/cputypes.
h?rev=1.5.4.3content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
says that:
/*
* Kinds of Processor. Only the first 7 are used, as they are
Terrific! disable pcibios worked for me. Here's my dmesg in case it's at all
useful. Is there any way to include this automatic workaround in a future
release? I'm not skilled enough to try to code something up myself, but I'd be
happy to do any testing or provide any further info.
OpenBSD
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:54, you wrot
You can consider short-circuiting of Boolean evaluation greedy, but it a
feature which may also save clock cycles if the right-most sub-expressions
are costly to evaluate.
thanks to all for the responses! what a great list!!
using the links and
I'm having a heck of a time with openbgp on openbsd 3.7. I am
attempting to set the localpref for a network and somehow it does not
appear to be happening. I've tried:
network 192.168.1.0/24 set localpref 200
and
match to any prefix 192.168.1.0/24 set localpref 200
and I
Original message from prad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:54, you wrote:
...
i was puzzled reading something on one of the wikipedia links provided:
The opposite of lazy evaluation is eager evaluation, also known as strict
evaluation. Eager evaluation is the evaluation
On Monday 22 May 2006 20:42, steven mestdagh wrote:
If you are still talking about making no_x11 flavors for the gd library
and everything that depends on it, I doubt this will happen.
You wouldnt really need to make no_x11 flavors of everything that depends on
GD, only GD itself would need
Hi every one,
Can I use a old Pinnacle PCTV Pro PCI v2.1 (R0B2D) in OpenBSD 3.9 and
where can I find information about how to configurate it?
Thanks and Regards,
Julian Bolivar
On 5/23/06, prad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:54, you wrot
You can consider short-circuiting of Boolean evaluation greedy, but it a
feature which may also save clock cycles if the right-most sub-expressions
are costly to evaluate.
thanks to all for the responses! what a
On Monday 22 May 2006 22:28, Liviu Daia wrote:
If you still don't get it, my problem is that,
with the current policy, three years from now there will be 50+ other
ports depending on X for no reason.
That's a pretty wild speculation considering the only problem now is that *1*
console
On 5/22/06, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
snip
You should install all of them and go nuts and post your findings.
I've spent alot of time with php, perl and java. In my world where
I only use a single 1U for production it boils down like this:
Java is a pig for http. Tasks
let's say that someone doesn't like me and/or a site that i run and they decide
to DDoS me. i have a couple of questions since i'm not too familiar with the
mechanics of a DDoS.
what are some methods of launching a DDoS attack?
what countermeasures can i take against such an attack?
feel free
Hi,
Well, now that I have the video issues resolved, I want to track down
the source of the lock-ups that I am seeing while running this laptop
and today's snapshot. Anything power-related (unplugging power cord,
adjusting screen brightness, attempting to suspend, etc.) locks the
laptop up
On 5/23/06, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
let's say that someone doesn't like me and/or a site that i run and they decide
to DDoS me. i have a couple of questions since i'm not too familiar with the
mechanics of a DDoS.
what are some methods of launching a DDoS attack?
Usually
*) JSP/Tomcat
+ chroot
+ strongly typed
+ compiled - mostly
- complex
Possibly my lack of knowledge here, but how are you figuring on
having tomcat in chroot? It won't be in apache's.
On 23 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original message from prad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
suppose that you have 2 conditions A and B where B take a lot of
effort to determine (eg looking for a string match in a huge file).
either A or B needs to be true before you can execute 'this'.
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 22:52:53 -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt proclaimed...
what are some methods of launching a DDoS attack?
syn floods (old skool), udp floods, lots of small packets, icmp floods,
whatever. my favorite is seeing a host flooded with protocol 50nearly
everyone passes it and hardly
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
