On 5/30/07, MiK[3]Zz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i am goin to set up cvsup/anoncvs/cvsync server, but don't knwo how. Can
you help me with configuration of these
*cvs* servers? I have already write an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but w/o any
answer. Thanks for help.
Here is information
Section 4.8 of the FAQ discusses how to capture the PBR for multibooting
with dd:
# dd if=/dev/rwd0a of=openbsd.pbr bs=512 count=1
Two questions.
* For stand-alone installations, is the PBR the same thing as the MBR?
* More importantly, how can I use dd to access the MBR in a multibooted
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:59 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[Jimmy Mitchener wrote:]
Is there a reason snapshots do not currently come with a
src/sys.tar.gz as releases do?
Because every snapshot for every architecture is done on a different
tree, and some are even done 5-6 times a day. So
Just installed a recent OpenBSD snapshot (May25) on my brand new Sony
VGN-FZ145E. Main issues seem to be in the following areas which must
all be disabled to boot
- acpi
- ehci
- pcibios
Happy to test any patches to try to fix these issues...
The very bottom of the email shows the error when
Hi,
Martin and Teemu will be at the Urania this week, if you are
in the area of Vienna, feel free to drop by and say hello
http://www.linuxwochen.at/2007/Wien
I'm of course stuck in Berlin this year (great scheduling guys ;-)
http://www.linuxtag.org/2007/en/
Wim.
--
Because every snapshot for every architecture is done on a different
tree, and some are even done 5-6 times a day. So this would require,
if I can guess this right, 2.6GB per day. Supplied over a T1.
Obviously a full tarball isn't the answer, but how about enough
information to reproduce the
Another issue that may be interesting:
Is this a server-like PC where you can tweak the serial console
usage from the BIOS?
I saw strange behaviour on a HP ProLiant DL145 G2 (I think) where
for some configuration of the serial BIOS console, the login
promp from OpenBSD on the serial port came
2007/5/31, Markus Lude [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:49:45PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
Hello,
i'm trying to install OpenBSD/Sparc64 on a Blade 100, tried various
methods/versions (all described in INSTALL.sparc64), they all fail after
'Trying bsd' and stall. Where
On 5/30/07, Jimmy Mitchener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a reason snapshots do not currently come with a
src/sys.tar.gz as releases do? I would think this to be quite useful
for people wishing/requiring building their own kernels, and using
snapshots, as it would help to minimize damage
Because every snapshot for every architecture is done on a different
tree, and some are even done 5-6 times a day. So this would require,
if I can guess this right, 2.6GB per day. Supplied over a T1.
Obviously a full tarball isn't the answer, but how about enough
information to
On 2007/05/29 22:06, Maurice Janssen wrote:
and sent -HUP to init. There's a getty process on tty00, but there's
no login: prompt on the terminal. Everything I type on the terminal is
echoed on the screen, so the cable is OK (local echo is off).
getty waits for an incoming connection
The
James Hartley wrote:
Section 4.8 of the FAQ discusses how to capture the PBR for multibooting
with dd:
# dd if=/dev/rwd0a of=openbsd.pbr bs=512 count=1
Two questions.
* For stand-alone installations, is the PBR the same thing as the MBR?
no.
* More importantly, how can I use dd to
Hello,
I am trying to get run usb onewire on my ulstra sparc5 using openbsd 4.1.
When I insert the usb-Fob it seem to work, I get the Log message:
uow0 at uhub0 port 2
uow0: Dallas Semiconductor USB-FOB/iBUTTON, rev 1.00/0.02, addr 2
onewire0 at uow0
But after that I only get the
Yeah, I have exactly the same problem on x86 running 4.1.
I can't provide dmesg now (i do not have such hardware at work).
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:28:26PM +0200, Dagobert Kellner wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get run usb onewire on my ulstra sparc5 using openbsd 4.1.
When I insert the
Hello!
I've long wondered where this error message comes from:
hostname nor servname provided, or not known
So I grepped my FreeBSD source code and found out it actually belongs to BIND9.
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Any chance you can change it? Perhaps to
On 5/29/07, Andrey Shuvikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I chainload OpenBSD with GRUB also and don't have any problems with cursor...
It might really be Ubuntu's modified version that is to blame... for
instance, the standard menu.lst features a quiet command that is
listed nowhere in the
Could you recommend me some Webhosting control panel for OpenBSD?
Thanks
Karel
Karel Galu9ka wrote:
Could you recommend me some Webhosting control panel for OpenBSD?
Thanks
Karel
plesk?
webmin-like stuff?
Google around, there's a few open source products...here's a couple of note:
http://www.ispconfig.org
http://www.ravencore.com
On 5/31/07, Karel Galuka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you recommend me some Webhosting control panel for OpenBSD?
Thanks
Karel
Gentile CLIENTE,
Desideriamo informarti, ai sensi del Decreto Legislativo 30 giugno 2003
n.196 Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali, che le
informazioni da te fornite o altrimenti acquisite nell'ambito dei servizi
da noi prestati, saranno oggetto di trattamento nel rispetto delle
Hi Karel,
On May 31, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Karel Galuka wrote:
Could you recommend me some Webhosting control panel for OpenBSD?
How about /bin/ksh?
:-)
I really don't know what you're expecting from a question like this.
At least name an example that might be familiar to some readers when
On 5/31/07, Chris S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/07, Andrey Shuvikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I chainload OpenBSD with GRUB also and don't have any problems with cursor...
It might really be Ubuntu's modified version that is to blame... for
instance, the standard menu.lst features a quiet
would appreciate some recommendations for project management software
that runs on openbsd and preferably windows as well.
cheers,
jake
* Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
would appreciate some recommendations for project management software
that runs on openbsd and preferably windows as well.
I like taskjuggler a lot (and use it a lot).
On 5/31/07, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
would appreciate some recommendations for project management software
that runs on openbsd and preferably windows as well.
I like taskjuggler a lot (and use it a lot).
using dotproject.
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so? Is
this number accurate? Do connections just start to timeout once I hit this
limit? I'm a little worried about this because we are fast approaching this
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so? Is
this number accurate? Do connections just start to timeout once I hit this
limit? I'm a little
Depends on the byte size of the packet. If most of your throughput is
standard 1500 byte packets, you should have little to no problem.
If someone starts blasting out 64 byte packets at wire speed though,
your link will be toast long before traffic ever reaches 100Mbps.
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so? Is
this number accurate? Do connections just start to timeout once I hit this
limit? I'm a little
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:18 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so? Is
this number accurate? Do connections just start to timeout once I hit this
limit? I'm a
On 2007/05/31 12:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so?
100Mb - somewhere between that and about 220,000. depends on packet size.
you're probably more interested
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:04:45PM +0200, Christian Plattner wrote:
Hi,
I am testing OpenBGPD and OpenOSPFD on a couple of Soekris boxes.
Even though I am using the latest code (-stable with ospfd kroute.c
revision 1.48), I am having problems with the kernel routing table
when OSPFD has to
On 5/30/07, stuart van Zee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of a good, easy-to-use client
for Yahoo instant messenger in the ports tree.
I do an internet radio show (definitely not
OpenBSD topical) and I need one that an intern
can use on my spare laptop to interface with
listeners etc.
Hi there,
I've been using openBSD for some months now, for example on my office
router which uses NAT (based on a tweaked example config from the FAQ).
This works really great!
But now I'm designing a firewall which is not used for any routing, and
will be ran on a machine having just one NIC.
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:43:56PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Were nearing the 8300pps mark so I was worried? But should I be?
You're fine. The 8300pps mark is not an upper limit, it's the best case
for a full 100Mbit ethernet link (ignoring jumbograms).
Becuase the majority of my
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on the byte size of the packet. If most of your throughput is
standard 1500 byte packets, you should have little to no problem.
If someone starts blasting out 64 byte packets at wire speed though,
your link will be toast long
Rafael Almeida wrote:
PS: it's not very polite of you calling your intern stupid.
That is sure true, but see, if the radio show can get by with what they
call STUPID intern that are use to interface with listeners, may be that
also tell you about the show itself and/or it's listeners may be.
[ qlength: 0/ 50 borrows: 0 suspends: 0 ]
[ measured: 6448.5 packets/s, 31.21Mb/s ]
Were nearing the 8300pps mark so I was worried? But should I be? Becuase the
majority of my packets are smaller then 64B, shouldn't I be able to pass a
lot more packets then 8300pps? If
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
by the way. I know where google is. I've been there and have even read some
of the links that are posted in this very thread. However I am confused and
there even seems to be some confusion/discrepancies within this thread... so
I
ok i feel better now and i think i got a better handle on this then before.
its a fast box with plenty of memory, intel pro gig eth cards (em), about
350k in the state table at the moment, with fairly small ruleset,
intelligenty would probably be up for debate! I would like to think so.
Thanks.
After OpenBSD boots, it clears the screen. Then I can't see some
information, for example, the start of local daemons. All I can see
using the console scrollback buffer is this:
dmesg
Automatic boot in progress: starting file system checks.
/dev/rwd0a: file system is clean; not checking
setting
It really sucks. it is slow.
On 5/31/07, James Hartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Section 4.8 of the FAQ discusses how to capture the PBR for multibooting
with dd:
# dd if=/dev/rwd0a of=openbsd.pbr bs=512 count=1
Two questions.
* For stand-alone installations, is the PBR the same thing as the MBR?
* More importantly, how
That's only(!) because you pulled out the turbocharge from your brain.
Check again!
Ioan
qw er [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/01 11:22 am
It really sucks. it is slow.
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Open Phugu wrote:
On 5/31/07, qw er [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It really sucks. it is slow.
What you say does not apply to OpenBSD. What you said describes you.
I find it amazing that, in 2007, people still respond to the most blatant
trolling in exactly the way that
On 5/31/07, Rafael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/30/07, stuart van Zee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of a good, easy-to-use client
for Yahoo instant messenger in the ports tree.
People have told you about gaim (pidgin), which is great, and it's the
one I use, but there
On 5/31/07, qw er [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It really sucks. it is slow.
What you say does not apply to OpenBSD. What you said describes you.
On 5/31/07, Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Open Phugu wrote:
On 5/31/07, qw er [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It really sucks. it is slow.
What you say does not apply to OpenBSD. What you said describes you.
I find it amazing that, in 2007, people still respond to
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Andris wrote:
After OpenBSD boots, it clears the screen. Then I can't see some
information, for example, the start of local daemons. All I can see
using the console scrollback buffer is this:
dmesg
Automatic boot in progress: starting file system checks.
/dev/rwd0a:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:44:10PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Open Phugu wrote:
On 5/31/07, qw er [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It really sucks. it is slow.
What you say does not apply to OpenBSD. What you said describes you.
I find it amazing that, in 2007,
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:44:10PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Open Phugu wrote:
On 5/31/07, qw er [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It really sucks. it is slow.
What you say does not apply to OpenBSD. What you said describes you.
I find it amazing that,
Steve Shockley wrote:
qw er wrote:
It really sucks. it is slow.
Not any more: http://marc.info/?m=118046279204104
.
That is too bad since I am one of those rare people sniff
-Ted
--
Theodore Bullock, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
B.Sc Software Engineering
Bike Across
Chris S wrote:
It might really be Ubuntu's modified version that is to blame... for
instance, the standard menu.lst features a quiet command that is
listed nowhere in the official GRUB documentation, AFAIR.
I use Ubuntu's GRUB and I dont have this problem.
---
Lars Hansson
On 5/31/07, Ted Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Shockley wrote:
qw er wrote:
It really sucks. it is slow.
Not any more: http://marc.info/?m=118046279204104
.
That is too bad since I am one of those rare people sniff
you should have sent in your dmesg then. hardware that
Not any more: http://marc.info/?m=118046279204104
That is too bad since I am one of those rare people sniff
Good! You only have to buy a boat then, since you've already got the
boat anchor!
Miod
Ted Unangst wrote:
you should have sent in your dmesg then. hardware that doesn't get
reported doesn't exist.
This is not really that big a deal to me. I certainly don't want to
stand in the way of progress just because I maintain an old 386 as a hobby.
I will send in the dmesg though,
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 02:12:47AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Jim M wrote:
I know I can block an outgoing IP address such as
block out quick on $external from any to 123.123.123.123
But can you also block a range of IP addresses? Such as
block out quick on $external from any to
57 matches
Mail list logo
