previously on this list Robert contributed:
> > What I may do to work VM QEMU faster???
>
> Not much.
> QEMU is faster on Linux, because they use KVM - which doesn't exist on
> OpenBSD.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=133612666103598
>
> kind regards,
I'm switching my main workstati
I have replaced samba with sftp and have an issue with atleast one app
(sage accounts, still trying to evaluate gnucash) that seems to be using
uppercase and then lower case filenames at different times.
I could move all the data about and create an msdosfs or look to
lowntfs-3g which I am not sur
command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
OpenBSDs userland is base qualified code such as nginx and extra
packages are kept separate in /usr/local.
For both snapshots and especially for building yourself follow
www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
For building from source; man release is brill.
Sync issues with packages built after upgrade
used so aggressively on LINUX mailing lists
because whilst 'apropos' is traditionally the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
previously on this list Kevin Chadwick contributed:
> /bin/dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd?c
Whoops, you should use the raw device on OpenBSD too. The following is
much faster at zeroing
/bin/dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd?c bs=
odern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
RTFM is used so aggressively on LINUX mailing lists
because whilst 'apropos' is traditionally the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
ign like polkit or systemd
___
I have no idea why RTFM is used so aggressively on LINUX mailing lists
because whilst 'apropos' is traditionally the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a t
dea why RTFM is used so aggressively on LINUX mailing lists
because whilst 'apropos' is traditionally the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
___
I have no idea why RTFM is used so aggressively on LINUX mailing lists
because whilst 'apropos' is traditionally the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
_
'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
universal interface'
(Doug McIlroy)
In Other Words - Don't design like polkit or systemd
___
I have no idea why RTFM is used so aggressively on LINUX mailing lists
because whilst 'apropos' is traditionally the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
polkit or systemd
___
I have no idea why RTFM is used so aggressively on LINUX mailing lists
because whilst 'apropos' is traditionally the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to h
ystems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
ssively on LINUX mailing lists
because whilst 'apropos' is traditionally the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
ly the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
a why RTFM is used so aggressively on LINUX mailing lists
because whilst 'apropos' is traditionally the most powerful command on
Unix-like systems it's 'modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
previously on this list Kenneth Westerback contributed:
> 1) It's not useful.
> 2) It's too complicated.
> 3) It's impossible to fit on the install media.
4) With the advent of signify and one of it's goals being efficiency it
would be a solution that needlessly wastes resources of many types.
modern' replacement 'apropos' on Linux is a tool
to help psychopaths learn to control their anger.
(Kevin Chadwick)
___
This was posted on the debian list and I was thinking of mentioning
OpenSSH having ed25519 recently added. Is the latest OpenSSH using ecdsa
potentially vulnerable to the alledged reduction to 32 bits of security.
__
> Also ECDSA
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:23:12 -0300
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> A static IP address without a meaningful reverse name mapping such as
> mail.myopenbsdhomeserver.com isn't very useful. Most ISP's wont do
> reverse mappings or will charge your eyeballs for it.
It's perfectly useful, mail is only dr
previously on this list Jean-Philippe Ouellet contributed:
> Also, "absolutely sure privacy is totally respected"???
> Let me know when you find a jurisdiction in which you can reasonably
> expect that to even be possible to begin with.
Yeah, I believe you have to pin STARTTLS for each host manua
previously on this list Jean-Philippe Ouellet contributed:
> The OpenBSD project does not digitally sign releases. The above
> command only detects accidental damage, not malicious tampering.
> If the men in black suits are out to get you, they're going to
> get you.
>
> It seems
previously on this list openda...@hushmail.com contributed:
> Anybody have any thoughts on how to achieve this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> O.D.
What do you mean, just run less? You need to consider what's important.
It already is the fastest at providing entropy and installing and
getting a secure server
previously on this list frantisek holop contributed:
> the lack of the same file is stopping sysmerge
> from working.
I'm sure you know but just in case, -S skips the check which you can do
manually as Theo mentioned.
p.s. I'm making a note of this day as the day I first put OpenBSD
X11 with mac
previously on this list Loganaden Velvindron contributed:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Luis Coronado wrote:
> > I know of similar issues with OOM and folks here recommeded reviewing the
> > ulimit settings:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=133363175403956&w=2
> >
> > You dont post
previously on this list Matthew Weigel contributed:
> > 1. Why doesn't OpenBSD have something like RBAC?
>
> RBAC has a lot more knobs to tweak, so you can always go back after a
> security incident and say "aha! I need to tweak *that* knob to prevent
> this next time!" But it has a steep learn
This is purely interest and of course feel free to ignore. I value
OpenBSD over Linux with grsecurity for many reasons such as patched by
default X and randomisation in any case.
I have just been wondering while some cards have run poorly in the
past at machdep.allowaperture=1, with KMS some now r
previously on this list Timo Myyrä contributed:
> Now that OpenBSD has tmpfs I'd use that instead of mfs.
>
> I just added following on my /etc/fstab:
>
> none /tmp tmpfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=1g,-m=1777 0 0
> none /var/cache tmpfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=128m,-m=0755 0 0
> none /var/run tmpfs rw,nodev,
previously on this list MJ contributed:
> >> And I hope it?s the thought that counts more than the amount.
> >
I guess it doesn't 'count' right now but does mean more and count more
if he ever becomes rich.
> > LOL, yes, especially when it comes to bills being paid.
Maybe that's a stark real
Xterm gets stuck in a loop burning 100% cpu until you destroy it if you
do say.
xterm -hold -e /bin/ls
Might a patch based on this freebsd patch fix that? The second part of
it isn't in the xenocara tree.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=136686
--
previously on this list Dag Richards contributed:
> I have a suggestion for every one of us that has mailed in an idea in
> response to a solicitaion for money...
>
> Send money.
I also plan to open a ticket and will have to find time to send a short
letter to the management of my hosting provi
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:09:09 -0800
patrick keshishian wrote:
> > The installer or man page asks for donations, how about the ssh login
> > banner or initial output which might get perhaps 100s of thousands more
> > eyefall?
>
> I see where this is headed: In app purchases! e.g., after
> couple
I had a usb that wouldn't mount so I've added logging and support for
"unused" sd*c disklabels for vfat, ext2/3/4 and ntfs via blkid. I think
newfs ffs writes the disklabel so you don't get unused for sd*c and so
don't need a blkid tool.
It's three times as long now though so if anyones interested
previously on this list Mario contributed:
> # mount /dev/cd0a /mnt
> # /mnt/5.4/packages/amd64
> # pkg_add emacs-21.4p23.tgz
You could set the PKG_PATH
Did you cd /mnt/5.4/packages/amd64
--
___
'Write programs that do one th
The installer or man page asks for donations, how about the ssh login
banner or initial output which might get perhaps 100s of thousands more
eyefall?
--
___
'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to wo
previously on this list agrquinonez contributed:
> The other idea, is Members, every one of us could give five dollars per
> month to keep the privilege of using OpenBSD; receiving information,
> participating in the list, etc.
I think that would strangle the project and possibly prevent future
d
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:28:19 -0700 (MST)
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> That's a great idea.
>
> I'm going drag a subgroup of the developers away from software
> development and we'll start working on that instead.
>
> Right away.
>
> To fund the drilling, we'll hold a bake sale.
Fair enough just thou
previously on this list Theo contributed:
> The OpenBSD project uses a lot of electricity for running the
> development and build machines. A number of logistical reasons
> prevents us from moving the machines to another location which might
> offer space/power for free, so let's not allow the co
previously on this list Артур Истомин contributed:
> > > I think pop3 is dead but recently there was a mail in tech@
> > > stating Sunil Nimmagadda develops pop3 daemon closed to
> > > OpenBSD standards.
> >
> > That's a good point. I don't like leaving mails on the server for more than
> > a
where you like just edit above and
must executable by _automount
___
#!/bin/sh
# Author: Kevin Chadwick
# License: BSD
#
#
# CONFIG
#
#exec >> /tmp/logfile 2>&1
#set -x
MOUNTLOCATION="/mnt/usb"
#Maybe useful to grab
previously on this list Maurice McCarthy contributed:
> I'm running Ubuntu Raring while I learn about OpenBSD (slowly as I'm too old
> to do anything quick) and I've lately found ntfs much quicker.
>
> As an experiment last night I tarred and gzipped 216G of video files across
> two USB3 hard
previously on this list Stuart Henderson contributed:
> > its a joke
> >
> > "Strangest of all was the ability of infected machines to transmit small
> > amounts of network data with other infected machines even when their power
> > cords and Ethernet cables were unplugged and their Wi-Fi and
previously on this list Stefan Sperling contributed:
>
> 5.4 will be out on Friday and I don't see why you shouldn't at least
> give it a try.
As already mentioned you can use mtier with 5.4 Release but if a
package you require isn't on mtier and needs updating then you can
either build the pack
> Food for thought for everyone, but like I said, he doesn't care and
> won't think about it.
As I say I am far more concerned about 'modern' incompetent ISP's.
Uncaring ISPs or ISP's that can only care about profit (and so
advertising) or they are out of business and tasking them (perhaps to
the
> Why? With a group of others, I started setting up an Internet
> Exchange in Calgary, and this has taken much time because it is highly
> politicized and has encountered some resistance.
So has your internet access (ISP) improved too since a while back or
just locally and what resistance did you
> > Oke,
> > What is then the best way to proceed ?
>
> Buy an ATI or Intel gfx card.
I assume you meant a system with an intel gfx chip and most use laptops
these days but this raised a thought with me.
What would be a cheap but decent enough, KMS supported VGA and or PCIEX
card model?
--
> Hi Otto,
>
> yeah thats planned with new hardware but this is a kinda urgent
> situation so if its possible I need to do the upgrade on this OpenBSd
> version
Personally I'd still advocate getting a disk ready on 5.4/3 testing and
swapping the disk as it is not much different and will be quic
> Under X, KMS performance should be faster on a lot of
> hardware. The whole point of KMS is to bring modern, better
> supported drivers to OpenBSD (and get rid of the crappy X
> security model).
I hope that's true but I think the most important point is that it is
slower because it is so much s
> Personally, I'm an long time fvwm user. My partner wouldn't know where to
> start nor care to learn how to use that. Which is why I need to install a DE.
> Years ago I did use KDE3 and liked it but changed because I did not like KDE4.
Don't forget especially with xfce you can take just parts o
> When I want to shut down, I use on/off switch. No permissions needed.
I am evaluating parts for improving my OpenBSD desktops but
xfce4-session is not part of it so I haven't chimed in yet as I thought
others may do a better job.
However on Linux such as my TV's I always have a console user aut
> In my experience, now that video is out of the way, the thing to look
> out most for is getting a well supported built-in wireless card.
> That's starting to become difficult when buying new laptops because
> most drivers are lacking support for newer hardware variants.
Perhaps someone knows of
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:51:43 +0100
Kaya Saman wrote:
> I
> think it's much harder to learn since the documentation is more 'sparse'
> and also much more limited in certain areas kernel PPP daemon for
> example :-) - it took me a while to figure out how to get PPPoE working.
Well I agree
While searching for 'OpenBSD "bad package" CONTENTS' I somehow came
across this and got sucked in when I shouldn't have.
OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure | BSD, the
truth
http://aboutthebsds{dot}wordpress{dot}com
Well I had a go at educating the author of this thread but
I don't use Gnome but this came up on the Gentoo list and so I post it
here in case it's not known already or is of any use to know about it.
>>>
>>> I"m not a gnome user as of yet, but I can tell you that the day is
>>>
> I'll try it and let you know.
Well I did a very quick test into memory at first (whilst doing
something else at the same time) and it seemed to talk about ufs
filesystem usage and I was very surprised. I then tried some more
comprehensive tests and only found dd usage.
I'll retry what I did ini
> On 04/13/13 19:27, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > 4.15 of the faq says
> >
> > Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are
> > FFS-aware.
> >
> > I haven't tested
> ...
>
> Get back with me when you have.
>
> I&#x
4.15 of the faq says
Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are
FFS-aware.
I haven't tested whether a broad brush had been applied expecting
ufs and ffs to be the same or if clonezillas statement is correct but
thought it may be worth bringing up that clonezilla.org says
F
> ports makefile are verifying downloaded (sources) file with checksum.
And you can download the ports makefiles via ssh cvs if you want
protection going forward.
--
___
'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write p
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:16:38 -0600
Steve Williams wrote:
> It's designed to work with sites that use "spf" records, and it
> doesn't know about ip6, not an issue in my case
>
> If you are interested in my script, feel free to contact me off list
SPF for spamd. I'd be interested if you don't min
> The only
> halfway sane reason I can think of not to use packages but ports
Hoping not to open commentry on the matter but so people are aware and
perhaps to avoid the next question, there are some security pluses of
using ports (checksums via ssh, landry's testing/beta firefoxes a little
earlie
> > Log message:
> > Significantly increase the wordlist for ddb hangman,
> > and update our device independent DRM code and the Intel DRM code
> > to be mostly in sync with Linux 3.8.3. Among other things this
> > brings support for kernel modesetting and enables use of
> > the rings on gen6+ Int
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 07:36:58 +0100
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Stay away from nVidia
> mobile chipsets and from recent AMD integated graphics.
>
> Since AMD's commercial names vs chipset names correspondance is a
> not clear to me, I don't know exactly how to check if a given AMD
> chipset is supporte
I was about to buy two thinkpads which are often suggested when the
OpenBSD laptop question is raised but the 93 in stock have disappeared
since saturday, aaargh.
There are still core2duos and lesser spec'd systems available which
has prompted me to ask the question I had pondered on.
Does anyone
I have easy to use setups of fvwm and xfce.
I recently started building xfce and I notice it pulled in polkit which
I am not a fan of for multiple reasons mainly because sudo is simply
better in every way except shipping permissions by default. Which IMO
is a plus though it could ship commented en
> > If I buy a car, and don't know how to operate it, and cause harm, nobody
> > would blame the manufacturer.
Never heard of a Toyota recall such as the accelerator pedal sending
cars into walls all by themselves. If cars were as bad as routers we
wouldn't need to worry about traffic atleast
> > Every firewall/router product that I have purchased has been
> > compromised so far.
>
> I don't believe this at all. Not one bit.
I could believe it but that doesn't mean that I do. 90% of the routers
on my street will be insecure and even using old sps, upnp or wep. SKY
is the worst, the
> I am really starting to like it!
I love it too but maybe one day long after we have KMS we may get to
install it on anyones laptop and know that it is highly likely to keep
itself upto date with current packages as a desktop all by itself. Of
course you can't always do that even with debian due
> I had to disable it as soon as I found out so the relevant logs are
> probably too far up the buffer, but I'll set up a test server ASAP and
> study the tcpdump in detail.
I forget if mobiles do more prefetching on dns and/or tcp on mobiles but
perhaps that's worth considering as a culprit.
Doe
> > Did you actually test that ? vi wants /var/tmp rw as well...
> >
>
> Nah, just going from memory. It's been a while. However, the same
> logic applies: Look at what partition /var is on and mount it too.
It will work just fine without /var. I believe it just puts a temporary
recovery fi
> Buy a refurbished ThinkPad, still better older ThinkPad
Anyone know of a good place to look for and what model the latest
thinkpad with fullscreen/without widescreen would be.
I'm guessing fullscreen and usb3 and pci express is an impossible mix
never minding throwing in running superbly on Op
> Hi,
>
> I installed Virtualbox 2.2.4 and everything is 100%.
>
You hope so but make it clear if you ever hit problems that you are not
on bare metal as bug reports have been looked at and been found to be
the fault of Virtualbox in the past with Theo commenting on their forum
that he couldn't
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:36:39 +0100
Jan Stary wrote:
> > This should not be an issue (this is also my response to Rogier).
> > Ext3 is nothing more than ext2 with extra journaling features
> > enabled,
>
> So in particular, the ext3 inode structure
> is precisely the ext2 inode structure?
I kn
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:43:44 +0100
pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) wrote:
> As default i wanna log which packet my firewall blocked.
> >
> > So how can i
> > log all blocked packets and my firewall can be still up and
> > running?
Hopefully I will never need them but I have various pf co
> I finally got to deploying greyscanner on my mailservers,
> and did something similar: trap every recipient address
> with two or more digits in the user part (one digit could
> be a typo, say a '2' before the '@'). This catches most of it.
I forget, did you previously say whitelisting with grey
> 1: I'm not sure there are no developers that would like to see this in
>base, but they could have other priorities; wanting something not
>necessarily means having (time) to do the work. The important
>difference is that you don't hear them.
I find gpg useful.
I think the main barr
> I don't know anything about
> spectrwm (or KDE or X for that matter :)
You can have two displays in xorg.conf or one split in two on two
screens as well as some other modes. There are various benefits to each
depending on the need for dragging and fullscreen etc.. So an app can
remember the ge
> >Because they can just hack it on top of their crusty old ftp server
> >software, whereas using sftp would need much bigger changes?
>
> SSL/TLS makes everything more secure
Never more so than when HSTS is enabled and you can't access paypal
because your clock is wrong due to a dead bios
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:45:40 -0300
Marcos Ariel Laufer wrote:
> I've been using OpenBSD since 2.6, this never happened to me with any
> other USB hard disks. This one in particular i bought it a couple of
> days ago.
I wonder if it freezes other OS or causes problems before even the bios
boot
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:18:29 +
Peter Kay wrote:
> I'm pretty certain my USB hub doesn't need to be uplinked to charge
> devices (the computer definitely does not need to be on)
It depends on your motherboard whether usb are powered when off. It
will need to be on on many computers especially
> For instance on one mailserver I took over, I noticed that after adding
> a Spamhaus sbl-xbl check, required rDNS, and other basic stuff like
> requiring a legitimate HELO/EHLO, spam attempts dropped by perhaps a
> factor of 100. It was shocking.
>
Required rDNS, so false positives went up by
> For instance on one mailserver I took over, I noticed that after adding
> a Spamhaus sbl-xbl check, required rDNS, and other basic stuff like
> requiring a legitimate HELO/EHLO, spam attempts dropped by perhaps a
> factor of 100. It was shocking.
>
When you required rDNS I bet false positives
> > > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth
> > > becoming familiar with. At least give it a shot since you're
> > > planning on reinstalling anyway. I think you'll be pleasantly
> > > surprised!
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, do you think the easiest method is to use
> I intend to get my hands on an IPv6 book to deal with some of the issues
> I'm having - which are mainly my lack of knowledge and expertise on the
> subject.
>
> I've seen "IPv6 Essentials", from O'Rilley mentioned a lot, and I've
> heard it has a BSD-related section too.
Probably not what your
> I do see a slight improvements when running a full GNOME 3 installation.
Only asking out of interest because I'm not a Gnome 3 fan but is Gnome
3 still playing ball with BSD or is it more like hard ball? Are they
just going to provide compilation flags to leave out the linux only
dependencies o
> I have State and Federal regulators that want me to PROVE (since their
> only used to looking at Micro$oft servers) my OBSD 5.1 server is up to
> date, and there are no outstanding patches that need to be applied.
It is extremely rare that a patch for base actually affects the parts
that I am us
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:34:23 +0800
Rowdy OpenBSD wrote:
> If the OpenBSD project signed its packages and distribution sets, we
> could reasonably assume that they were not compromised between being
> signed and our downloading them. Your current processes do not
> provide the same degree of assura
> No more response from me without bright ideas.
I guess the simplist solution would be for a builder with source tree
access to upload just the snapshot SHA256 to the source tree for
secure cvs download by users?
--
___
'Write
> but that requires X
That's a non sensical response that has already been answered and you
wonder why you are thought to be a troll. X doesn't need to run and
some files are required for some packages. Lots of packages are
required for some packages, something OpenBSD fights as best it can
and do
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:49:34 -0430
Andres Perera wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:49:15 -0430
> > Andres Perera wrote:
> >
> >> doesn't in any way justify
> >> downloading sha256 from more than one
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:49:15 -0430
Andres Perera wrote:
> doesn't in any way justify
> downloading sha256 from more than one mirror from the same connection,
> kevin
It does if a lower tier has been compromised and I never said from the
same connection.
You must be one of them body language read
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:12:37 +0800
Rowdy OpenBSD wrote:
> > To the OP. When checking I choose a source mirror or two and download
> > just the SHA256. There is no sha256 for src.tgz and sys.tgz but you can
> > use ssh for the source code by getting the fingerprint once like for
> > signatures but t
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 07:26:26 -0400
Tony Abernethy wrote:
> >A very simple addition to the FAQ would not be a problem.
> >WOW! This question seems to be asked a lot!
> >A simple addition to the FAQ does not seem to be a problem, Nick.
> >Yes, I know , a very stupid question asked many times.
> >A si
> > Is there any way to verify that distribution sets and packages that I
> > have downloaded have not been tampered with (e.g., by someone with
> > access to the mirror from which I downloaded them)?
>
> Download the checksums from another mirror using a different connection.
>
> The project d
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:30:05 +1200
ml+helloke...@extensibl.com wrote:
> > You specify a character usually defaulting to - as a seperator
> >
> > and then acceptable addresses
> >
> > bob
> > bob-
> > pete-
> >
> > for a domain like bobszz.net
> >
> > so bobszz.net can receive mail to
> >
>
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:12:22 +0200
Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > I think this came up before but my Googling failed to find it.
> >
> > I love disposable addresses and being able to say. Oi what you doing
> > giving my address to spammers, or have you had a virus??
> >
> > A todo list was mentioned,
I think this came up before but my Googling failed to find it.
I love disposable addresses and being able to say. Oi what you doing
giving my address to spammers, or have you had a virus??
A todo list was mentioned, I was just wondering if disposable addresses
was on it or would that be in a gala
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 23:51:27 -0400
Ryan Kirk wrote:
> You're definitely on track, although I was referring to D.J.
> Bernstein's recent slides: http://cr.yp.to/talks/2012.06.04/slides.pdf
>
Thanks, I'll take a gander.
> In these, he does bring up the same problems again that his DNSCURVE
> purp
> However,
> this would require DNSSEC to be secure (which itself seems to be mired
> in controvery lately, not to mention the slow rate of adoption)
Do you have a reference for that. I know of the controversy around
DNSCURVE before DNSSEC even arrived but haven't seen any of late. Is it
to do wit
401 - 500 of 891 matches
Mail list logo
