For some reason I can only use milestone 0.9 - for the past couple of
days I've tried to use the nightly buids (on my Win98 SE machine) but
they won't even start. Right after the splash screen stays up there for
about ten seconds a close program dialogue pops up with the following
details:
MOZIL
"Bill Pleasants" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
> There is a problem with the server (HawkCommunications.com) or my
> software (Communicator 4.07, Quarterdeck Winsock, Windows 3.1).
netscape.public.mozilla.general is not a forum for Nets
"Neutrino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> When I launch PDF documents from Netscape, both my browser
> and Acrobat application freeze. I must go to 'Task Manager'
> and End Task for both applications. The problem is sporadic
> and I cannot see
Howard M. Stark wrote:
> The headers are missing in mail/news. They are gone in several versions
> of mozilla,0.9, 2001052304, etc. I'm running win98 SE. I first noticed
> they were missing after trying to get bookmarks to load in the sidebar
> following the suggestions in bug #71685. I'm not
Russell Hoover wrote:
> Can I easily do a custom install of the new 0.9 Mozilla that lets me
> jettison everything but the web browser itself and perhaps a few necessary
> accessories (SSL, 128-bit encryption, ability to view page source, etc)?
Yes, but just so you know, it's mainly cosmetic. Sam
The headers are missing in mail/news. They are gone in several versions
of mozilla,0.9, 2001052304, etc. I'm running win98 SE. I first noticed
they were missing after trying to get bookmarks to load in the sidebar
following the suggestions in bug #71685. I'm not sure that there is any
connecti
Try it with the same configuration and IE 5.x. If that works, it is a
Netscape issue. If not, it is probably OS related.
Can you replicate the problem on other computers with NC 4.75?
"Neutrino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> When I launch PDF
On Fri, 25 May 2001 10:27:09 +1000, Steve Hodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>Agreed, but one last thing. The use of resolve in this sense was not
>some arbitrary decision by some Mozilla engineer. RFC 1034
>(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1034.txt) which defines the Domain Na
When I launch PDF documents from Netscape, both my browser
and Acrobat application freeze. I must go to 'Task Manager'
and End Task for both applications. The problem is sporadic
and I cannot seem to replicate it consistently. The problem
appears to occur more frequently with larger PDF file
On Thu, 24 May 2001 16:48:25 -0500, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>Go over to .performance my friend, and see how serious I in fact am, and
>how serious the situation in fact is. Then eat a little crow.
I went over to .performance, curious to see if this was in fact the
Slug wrote:
> Now thats Funny :-)
Thank you. I consider obtuse humor to be my personal contribution to Mozilla.
After all, every big lizard needs to know how to take a joke.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [ http
Howard M. Stark wrote:
> Having started this let me end it. The way resolving is used is a bit
> unusual, "looking up" would be better usage and more accurate. In any
> case it is more user friendly to use the vocabulary of the user rather
> than the designer.
>
> This is not worth more dis
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
>
> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard DeMoN_LaG say these
> wise words:
>
> > Resolving host means looking up the address.
>
> Then why don't we simply call the process of looking up the IP number
> "Searching DNS for IP number" instead of "resolving ho
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I know it's integrated, but why does it seem that so many
> people assume it's not possible to install just the browser?
Probably because:
* It is uncommon that you can jettison such a big part of a thing that
runs as one app.
Thanks for your reply.
I am running RedHat Linux 7.0.
>From what I have read so far, Mozilla and Adobe acrobat do not work
together.
Yi-Ming Chung wrote:
> Warren Parker wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone been able to get the adobe plugin to work with Mozilla 0.9?
>
> Which platform are you using?
> Chec
Fabian Guisset wrote:
>
> JTK wrote:
>
> >
> > Because nobody is interested in taking the necessary steps to make it do
> > otherwise. Consider: Mozilla's startup time has not improved since the
> > Netscape 6.0 fiasco. Which was what, like six months ago?
> >
>
> Before this post I thought y
the problem that im facign now had been posted in the group earlier as
well, but not solution for it has been found.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=drop+down+netscape+print+preview&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=7g2bff%24rvr%241%40nnrp1.dejanews.com
Im using Netscape4.74 and using JSPs
Hello,
There is a problem with the server (HawkCommunications.com) or my
software (Communicator 4.07, Quarterdeck Winsock, Windows 3.1). For the
past week occasionally after making connection per the winsock, the
message "No response. Server may be down or not responding" has
appeared after I cl
JTK wrote:
>
> Because nobody is interested in taking the necessary steps to make it do
> otherwise. Consider: Mozilla's startup time has not improved since the
> Netscape 6.0 fiasco. Which was what, like six months ago?
>
Before this post I thought you really believed what you were saying,
Hello, Dear Friend!
Serious offer for You here. This is not ordinary offer as many in Internet.
Would You like to improve Your life?
Do You have financial difficulties?!
Do You want to change Your life?!
You need to come here!!!
Here the New Way will open for You!
Please visit http://paladin.ho
Pierre Wieder wrote:
>
> Hey
>
> Why does Mozilla/mail take up to 2 minutes just to start up?
> (P3-550Mhz/256Mb RAM Win2k)
Because nobody is interested in taking the necessary steps to make it do
otherwise. Consider: Mozilla's startup time has not improved since the
Netscape 6.0 fiasco. Whic
This page seems to work in my Netscape 4.76 and in
Mozilla 0.8 under Linux SuSE 7.1
--
Alejandro Melcón y Maribel Ruano
c/ Soldado Rosique 1; 13-Drcha
30205 Cartagena (Murcia)
Tel: 968 08 3652
Móvil: 63 63 61 885
Hello,
After upgrading from Mozilla .8 to .9 I discovered some 3000 messages in my
inbox. 3000 messages that I had already processed, replied to, deleted, etc.
Now I'm sifting through them (only 1000 left to go!) and I think that the
upgrade did something to confuse the inbox from the trash.
At home, I'm using 0.9 with helper apps quite successfully. My profile
at home was freshly created with 0.9.
At work, I have a profile that's been around since maybe M18 or before,
using 0.8, 0.8.1 and 0.9. Helper apps don't seem to work at all on this
setup - the ones I had set up previously don
Russell Hoover wrote:
> I've been using MacOS 8.1 forever and am now upgrading to 9.1. I've been
> using the Navigator 4.08 standalone browser for the last couple of years
> (got tired of the constant upgrade merry-go-round).
>
> I want to continue using *just* a browser. I don't want Communic
I've been using MacOS 8.1 forever and am now upgrading to 9.1. I've been
using the Navigator 4.08 standalone browser for the last couple of years
(got tired of the constant upgrade merry-go-round).
I want to continue using *just* a browser. I don't want Communicator, I
don't want a mail or news
jesus X wrote:
> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
>>And it came to pass that Fabian Guisset wrote:
>>
>>>I don't mean to sound pessimist, but the last few messages
>>>all concern NS4. What should we do?
>>>Like Alex, reply every time that it is the wrong newsgroup?
>>>(quite irritating and boring). Or
Having started this let me end it. The way resolving is used is a bit
unusual, "looking up" would be better usage and more accurate. In any
case it is more user friendly to use the vocabulary of the user rather
than the designer.
This is not worth more discussion.
Thanks
Howie
Mama Cass E
Hi!
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
>
> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard DeMoN_LaG say these
> wise words:
>
> > Resolving host means looking up the address.
>
> Then why don't we simply call the process of looking up the IP number
> "Searching DNS for IP number" instead of "resolvi
On Thu, 24 May 2001 10:59:00 +0300, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>When I log in to the back, I give the next unused login password on my
>password sheet. That password is not used again. When I am done setting
>up transactions, I have to recheck the list of t
I'm still getting the icons for modern I had months ago. I've seen a
different set somewhere that have more color in the forward, reply and
reply-to-all buttons. Any way I can check which theme version I'm using?
This might be something to do with how I'm doing things. I have 0.9
installed on
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What exactly do you mean by one-time passwords? I'm not
> familiar with it.
I have a password sheet that contains numbered login passwords and a set
of confirmation passwords.
When I log in to the back, I give the next unused
> Could someone describe for me what an OJI plugin needs to do with
> respects to implementing nsIModule?
You need netscape.public.mozilla.oji :-)
Gerv
33 matches
Mail list logo
