Re: [mssms] RE: Behaviour of available time setting in software update deployments

Just to be clear, that's a 2 hour window from the deadline time, not the available time. However, if my understanding is correct, the downloads wouldn't all begin immediately after the available time anyway. The updates are just made available for clients to discover/download at that time. Each

RE: [mssms] RE: Behaviour of available time setting in software update deployments

How about this? Computer Agent: -Roland From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Freitag, 13. Februar 2015 18:32 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Behaviour of available time setting in softw

Re: [mssms] query Add Remove Programs (32 and 64)

well, up to you I guess if you want to add another section... but personally I'm getting version 4.5* stuff with the existing edit. I haven't seen a need to update it to look in the \Full sub regkey--the exact same version information is in the \Client sub regkey. At least for me. does someon

[mssms] RE: Powershell install of updates not working

Casey Is it possible it's just the script? When I try to run it I get an error from the extra '}' at the end. I'm guessing that's because this section is copied from a larger script, and you just included an extra '}' accidentally here. When I run it without that script it runs fine. Are there a

RE: [mssms] RE: Behaviour of available time setting in software update deployments

Yep. http://windowsitpro.com/system-center-2012/q-why-did-my-scheduled-system-center-configuration-manager-2012-update-install-ge Note: The actual installation deadline time is the displayed deadline time plus a random amount of time up to 2 hours. This reduces the impact of all client computer

Re: [mssms] query Add Remove Programs (32 and 64)

Thank you Sherry, very useful. If only I knew this before maybe you could update the mof snippets to get version 4.5 and above as per Determine Which .NET Framework Versions Are Installed From: Sherry Kissinger Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 2:30 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re:

RE: [mssms] RE: Behaviour of available time setting in software update deployments

Are you sure about this? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:58 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Behaviour of available time setting in software update deployments From

Re: [mssms] Difference between 'do not specify' and 'never apply' re power management collection settings

Never apply = Configmgr will not apply power management settings to computers in this collection even if they are in another collection with power management settings. Not Specified = This collection has no power management settings associated with it. Think of it this way: If your boss comes up

RE: [mssms] RE: Behaviour of available time setting in software update deployments

From memory, there is always a random delay (up to 2 hours I think) after the available time for clients to start downloading updates so this is not concern. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of CESAR.ABREG0 Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015

RE: [mssms] Last used time for a software

The ConfigMgr client uses the software metering agent to track usage. You can see this in c:\windows\ccm\logs\mtrmgr.log. I am not 100% certain but I think AI uses the same log to determine when processes and exes were last ran or used. Daniel Ratliff -Original Message- From: listsa

RE: [mssms] Provider use

App-V may be your issue, the virtualization layer may not be handling the network very well. We first rolled out App-V (4.6) as well and had similar issues, a lot of crashes. When we upgraded to R2 we went away with it and haven’t had any issues since. Might be worth it to install manually to

RE: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009?

If the 2nd update depends on the first, doesn't it have to re-run the scan? The behavior I have seen is that it uses the cached results, and doesn't know it even needs the 2nd update until after the scheduled scan happens. Chris Barnes Senior Technical Specialist Penske Automotive Group (248) 6

Re: [mssms] RBAC: Deploy action linked to Collection not making sense

You mean 'packager role'. 1. Creat a collection name 'pkg USA servers' limited to 'all systems' 2. Create a scope, give it a generic name since it can be for many purpose. 3. Creat a new role to limit your 'action' permission. 4. Add user/group, add ONLY the scope and collection you created. 5

Re: [mssms] query Add Remove Programs (32 and 64)

I recommend this mof edit: http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/skissinger/archive/2011/05/25/hardware-inventory-mof-edit-for-net-frameworks-updated-with-v1.aspx It'll grab v1, v2, v3, v3.5 and v4.x of .net On Friday, February 13, 2015 6:46 AM, sms sccm wrote: that’s what I did and that

Re: [mssms] query Add Remove Programs (32 and 64)

that’s what I did and that would work but I found out that .NET 4.5.2 will not be added to ARP on Windows 8.1/Server 2012 R2 (it’s in the ARP Installed Updates ‘Update for Microsoft Windows (KB2934520)’). Now I have extended hardware inventory to include a registry key I have found here: Determ

Re: [mssms] TS progress bar dissapears during build and capture

Problem solved! Hyper-V was the culprit! Apperently there is a feature in Hyper-V that makes you switch between "Basic Session" and "Enhanced Session" (the rightmost Icon in the menybar). Somehow this had been activated in my session and when in "Enhanced Session" it did not show the progress bar b

RE: [mssms] Provider use

They ARE at R2 CU1 The consoles are, as far as we can tell consistent, yes – they are all App-V and we have superseded the old console with an uninstall but will check that out – good call. With 400 plus users it’s tough to tell any specific reason but we have seen crashes when someone i

RE: [mssms] Provider use

Got mixed up in my emails. Thought you said your were at R2 cu1. Are the consoles at the same cu level as the cas? -Original Message- From: Jason Wallace [jaso...@outlook.com] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 04:41 AM Eastern Standard Time To: mssms@lists.myitfo

RE: [mssms] Provider use

We have a similar environment, Cas + 2 primaries, about 400 console installs and no crashing issues. Is there a given task that usually happens before the crash? Do you have any console addons? Are all the consoles at CU1 as well? Any errors in event logs on the CAS or local client? Does the co

Re: [mssms] TS progress bar dissapears during build and capture

Additional info is that doing the same build and capture for Windows 7 works as expected. Regards Mattias Benninge http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/author/matbe/ On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Mattias Benninge wrote: > Forgot to write that I'm Using SCCM 2012 R2 Cu1. > > Regards > Mattias B

Re: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009?

yes it will install on next software updates deployment evaluation cycle From: sccmfun Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 11:18 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009? Hmm, I need to test that maybe I wasn’t patient enough. Can anyone else confirm that if a

Re: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009?

get well soon! From: Thomas Gonzalez Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 12:47 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009? Disregard my email, I shouldn't send out emails while I have the flu Thomas Gonzalez -

Re: [mssms] TS progress bar dissapears during build and capture

Forgot to write that I'm Using SCCM 2012 R2 Cu1. Regards Mattias Benninge http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/author/matbe/ On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Mattias Benninge wrote: > Hi, > > Im trying to create new golden Windows 8.1 image, I'm using windows 8.1 > Enterprise Wim file from MVLS a

[mssms] TS progress bar dissapears during build and capture

Hi, Im trying to create new golden Windows 8.1 image, I'm using windows 8.1 Enterprise Wim file from MVLS and everyting works ok. But after the first reboot after the "Setup Windows and Configuration Manager" step occurs i get a logon screen instead of a TS progress bar. The TS proceeds in the bac

[mssms] Provider use

Hello folks I wanted to ask a few questions around The Provider and its usage if I may please. I have a customer with a CAS and 2 PRI sites. They have quite a complex RBA model. They do all management against the CAS. They have 458 installed copies of the CM console and they have a fa

RE: [mssms] RBAC: Deploy action linked to Collection not making sense

Actually I don’t know what you mean exactly with “scoped to an empty collection”. Can you elaborate? The goal is: Allow deployment of applications only while they have the scope “packagers”. Have read access to everything (basically), especially all applications. -roland