Although a pain point, not having multiple NAA is not a strict show stopper -
you can use Kent's proposed solution or use pass through authentication. Thus,
basing this decision on this one single limitation which can be worked around,
is probably ... well, not the best.
As for the additional f
Eww yuck (IMO). This requires duplication of effort, duplication of
configuration, and duplication of resources.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:55 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Su
12:06 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [mssms] OSD vs. MDT -- Let the debate begin (again)
amen brutha!
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jason Sandys
mailto:ja...@sandys.us>> wrote:
Eww yuck (IMO). This requires duplication of ef
It's all about the page size; SSRS targets multiple formats all which have a
"page" concept and thus divides displayed data into pages - it's actually the
renderer that does this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee210530.aspx#Pagination. Thus, you
must manipulate the page size.
Here
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2872041
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Christopher Mosby
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 4:42 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] FW: Issues with MS13-052
Hotfix available today
Thanks,
Chris
So, I do truly like PowerShell and advocate its use as often as possible, but
why not use a WMI CI for this? In this case, it's much easier.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:34 AM
To: mssms@lists.myit
I haven't really looked at, but the SoftwareLicensingService class that is part
of AI is supposed to be for Windows activation. You should/may be able to use
it.
The Volume Activation Management Tool (VAMT), part of the AIK (although that's
a really old version) and ADK (and also downloadable s
He meant that the system being inventoried was a refresh not ConfigMgr as a
whole - that's why he asked if you had tried deleting the resource.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of JRIT
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 7:31 PM
To: mssms@lists.m
he BIOS. these were all IBM
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Jason Sandys
mailto:ja...@sandys.us>> wrote:
I haven’t really looked at, but the SoftwareLicensingService class that is part
of AI is supposed to be for Windows activation. You should/may be able to use
it.
The Volume Activat
No. By definition, the PullDP acquires its content from its parent DP.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of HS SYS Admin
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:39 AM
To: mssms
Subject: [mssms] Pull DP
We are considering using Pull-DPs in our env
First note, that certs aren't a requirement for IBCM, they are a requirement
for HTTPS client mode which in turn is a requirement for IBCM.
Technically, not a problem. A cert is a cert is a cert. As long as the certs
you use meet the requirements outline on TechNet:
http://technet.microsoft.com
All of them. Direct Access is a network connectivity solution that operates
below ConfigMgr. ConfigMgr doesn't know anything about it just like it doesn't
know anything about a VPN or a router for that matter. It sends traffic, the
enwtrok delivers the traffic.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitfor
Don't mix up AD System Group discovery in 2007 with AD Group Discovery in 2012.
They are two completely different things. AD Group Discovery in 2012 is the
evolution of AD Group Discovery in 2007, not System Group Discovery.
Thus, just like with System Discovery, the presence/existence of the cl
I know of (and have been involved with) at least three large (16,000, 50,000 ,
and 75,000 clients) organizations that have done this. One took 9 months to
compare the capabilities of the two.
I can't speak to specifics other than Altiris sucks and ConfigMgr rocks! :-)
J
-Original Message-
Just so someone on the “outside” doesn’t stumble on this, a few notes below
(inline):
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Christopher Bodnar
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 2:59 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Altiris Upg
Totally not supported. I'm curious as to where you read this?
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:06 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] WS2008 R2 to WS2012 Upgrade
We have pr
Are you running the built-in task for backing up ConfigMgr? It sounds like you
are because that task restarts the services. You should ditch that task and use
a built-in DB backup which is fully supported in 2012 and much more flexible
while not losing any capability.
J
From: listsad...@lists.
Not very familiar with all the3 ins and outs of OOB, but the certs are created
by your PKI, not the OOB point. The OOB point is just a layer of
management/communication so doesn't really have any "state" - just like an MP
or secondary site. Thus, there's nothing really to back or recover. Your P
ilto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: 01 August 2013 14:40
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Out of Band Service Point Backup?
Not very familiar with all the3 ins and outs of OOB, but the certs are created
by your PKI, not
The latest ACT uses a SQL DB so I would think so.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of christopher.catl...@us.sogeti.com
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 9:43 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] FW: [mdop] Application Compatibility
You should initiate activation during deployment.
There is a simple vbs script that is part of the Office installation that does
this. I thought there was something in OCT also if you are using a KMS that
will automatically during it for you.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:list
: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:20 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Office 2010 SP2 Activatio
No, you can't do this.
Note that you *may* be able to uninstall, leaving the content intact, and
reinstall under the new secondary site and then when assigning content to the
DP, it will see it as being there already.
Either way, it's an uninstall and reinstall.
You can also use content presta
None of the above. MP use by clients is not in any way location aware.
When you say "they wanting to connect to the new one", when is this? During the
initial boot, during the TS, after the TS, some other time?
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
B
None of the above. MP use by clients is not in any way location aware.
When you say "they wanting to connect to the new one", when is this? During the
initial boot, during the TS, after the TS, some other time?
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
B
I haven't personally tried it, but yes, this should work and is documented at:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/michaelgriswold/archive/2013/03/13/kb2775511-deployment-for-the-sccm-admin.aspx
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of HELMS, DAVID C
Se
Make sure you also create a new object in AD for the system as 2012 does use
the SID of the computer object to match up resources.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 7:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.my
From his original message: “We have over 300k clients, so we need a CAS.”
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of rob...@sulla.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:06 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com; Spinelli, Robert J
Subject: Re: [mssms] Answ
Also note that this is totally against the Apple end user license. Not saying
anything about whether you should or shouldn't do this, just passing on the
info.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 201
Not if used as a NAS, no. If you can attach the storage and allow it to be
presented by a Windows OS, then yes.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Timothy Ransom
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 2:29 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject
You can if you use MDT
G
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Jason Sandys
mailto:ja...@sandys.us>> wrote:
Not if used as a NAS, no. If you can attach the storage and allow it to be
presented by a Windows OS, then yes.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists
August 13, 2013 3:26 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: use NAS for DP in SCCM 2007/2012
No but you can copy the deployment share to a NAS box and use in MDT-based
deployments.
That is what we're doing for 12,000 PCs
The cheap way to go
G
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:03 P
p NAS and allow use of client PCs as
BDPs -not the best option but without servers I will take it - atleast we can
monitor and report on BDPs.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sen
Primary sites cannot overlap - multiple primary sites also do not in any way
provide (realistic) DR and certainly no HA or site resiliency.
Most folks have a good backup and recovery plan for their primary site server
(or use their hypervisor's functionality to provide HA - this doesn't help wit
Adding WSUS and a SUP could give you HA; however, client use of SUPs is not
location aware, thus having multiple SUPs is useless unless your intention is
HA.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Friday, August 16,
Just use Save As in Report Builder: instant template.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM2012 Reports
Yeah I am learning this the
The main use of fast/slow is for defining VPN locations. Using the fast/slow
setting, the client determines that it shouldn't download the content at all
based on the content's setting. So, for example, if a client connects via VPN
and they Office deployed, the client will see that it is connect
No. Many of us run and have customers running this without any issues - it's a
question that has come up in multiple places multiple times and everyone pretty
much says the same thing: it works fine.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Br
I'm curious how one gets to 1600 deployments for a single system? Are you
deploying every possible update to it?
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:19 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Sub
: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:34 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] client policy processing
Three things to note here:
- It's REBOOT=REALLYSUPPRESS not /REBOOT=REALLYSUPPRESS
The slash would mean that REBOOT is a switch for msiexec which it is not; it's
a public property that the MSI itself uses to dictate the reboot behavior (this
leads to the next point)
- It's
liff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:41 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Computer Res
Have you set up/verified your SPN for the new SQL Server instance?
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Thomas Gonzalez
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:15 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: move of sql db
I'm touching
esday, August 21, 2013 2:31 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: move of sql db
Geez:*( totally forgot...thanks jason
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent
Serious FUD to my knowledge. TMG has been killed as has Forefront for Exchange
and SharePoint so the security product focus of Microsoft certainly has gone
away, and SCEP as a distinct entity from ConfigMgr is essentially gone, but it
does still exist and is part of the long term endpoint/client
s this way.
-Phil
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:41 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [m
Note that the underscore is also a wildcard in SQL/WQL as are what I call
character classes (similar to regular expressions).
% means 0 or more of any character
_ means 1 of any character
More info at http://www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_wildcards.asp
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto
Do you have a CAS and one or more primary sites?
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Belcher, Daniel (US - Hermitage)
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:00 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Updated software distribution trouble
First, remember that Microsoft neither invented or owns PXE in any way and that
PXE is a standard protocol so PXE functionality has *nothing* to do with SMS
2003, ConfigMgr 2007 ConfigMgr 2012 or any version of any PXE server from any
vendor - they are all just implementing an industry standard.
Decommission your Citrix servers.
(end of day, you didn't ask for a good solution, just what could be done)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:38 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [ms
eeing Citrix step on WMI classes in root/ccm as a
chronic issue, so I'm not a friend 'o Citrix at the moment.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2
This is fairly typical with exe uninstallers. Essentially, the exe is just a
bootstrapper that launches another process to perform the actual uninstallation
and then exits right away. ConfigMgr does not know (or really have any way to
know) that this is what is happening so when the bootstrapper
..@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2013 11:40 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Application Uninstall Issue
This is fairly typical with exe uninstall
't get any notifications and i really think that it
isn't supported by MS. But until now it works fine.
Von: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] Im Auftrag von Jason Sandys
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. August 2013 23:34
An:
for hotfixes and Releases were for new
features. The current "method" is too muddy.
Ivan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:39 AM
T
;tasklist' with 'find' to check for open process or
excutable, loop if error level is '0' (found the process running) - works for
me at times.
[Inline image 1]
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Jason Sandys
mailto:ja...@sandys.us>> wrote:
That doesn't ch
tforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Mittwoch, 28. August 2013 17:15
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Application Uninstall Issue
And that of cours
d...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Mittwoch, 28. August 2013 17:15
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Application Uninstall Issue
And that of course assumes you actually know the &
Are you at SP1? If so, this is all OOBE (as long as you've downloaded the
updated media from Jan 24th I think).
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of andrew.ber...@everestre.com
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:58 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitfo
ot on SP1 *yet*. Plan to deploy SP1 and R2 in
tandem rather than risk breaking things twice in such a short window.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:
ment Points
Sorry, should have specified. Not on SP1 *yet*. Plan to deploy SP1 and R2 in
tandem rather than risk breaking things twice in such a short window.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason
h update are you referring to? Can it be installed outside of an SP1
update/upgrade?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:47 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.c
664096>
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Windo
specified. Not on SP1 *yet*. Plan to deploy SP1 and R2 in
tandem rather than risk breaking things twice in such a short window.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, August
I typically recommend just rebuilding the SUSDB. There's absolutely nothing
unique about it. Backing it up is easy to add to your SQL maintenance plan
though - you are using a native SQL backup up now for 2012, correct?
As for SSRS, same thing really. The reports are stored in the SSRS DB so
ba
Yes, that's exactly what I said - but you're over thinking it.
You could re-backup the whole database when you create a new report *or* export
the report to an .rdl file and just back it up *or* both. If nothing's changed,
there's no reason to do anything.
You can't robocopy the reports, becaus
Wow, really? 5 minutes is well below anything I would ever recommend. Glad it's
working for you though. How many clients do you have?
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Johan van Dijk
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 2:13 AM
To: mssms@lists.
Or you could use a real monitoring tool like OpsMgr and not rely on SNMP.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Anand Upadhyay - Information Technology
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 10:09 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms]
Dead horse: Reason #316 not to use a CAS.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 9:56 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 meets tablets - The case of the "Unknown
It's not about object replication. Collection evaluation is performed on the
primary sites. Thus, when you initiate a collection update on a CAS, it must
first replicate the request to the primaries. Then the primaries must update
their instance of the collections which is then replicated back u
Not in a truly supported fashion no - it'd be technically possible using the
same technique that was used to deliver updates to FEP 2010 in ConfigMgr 2007,
but that's not supported for 2012.
You could use a separate WSUS instance or a file share though.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
file share though.
How would I go about doing that? We already have those servers pointed at a
different (not SCCM) WSUS server for Windows patches.
Gary
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ja
file share though.
How would I go about doing that? We already have those servers pointed at a
different (not SCCM) WSUS server for Windows patches.
Gary
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ja
To my knowledge, the best you can do is run a script to delete the icon (until
R2).
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 12:21 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Softw
__
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 11:30 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] Sof
The SUP is a role like any other and can be placed on the site server or any
site system. So yes, nothing special here.
What's you motivation for 5 SUPs? A remote stand-alone SUP can support up to
100,000 clients. So, for HA, you really only need 2 per site.
Also, if you have 100,000+ clients (
Hmmm, I never thought about it, but it's not surprising. From what we've been
told, the only significant thing is the DB and the site restore process only
uses the DB regardless of how the DB was backed up. Thus, even if you are using
the built-in backup maintenance task, only the DB is used and
R2 :)
I know that doesn't help today, but they added the ability to retry or pause
package distribution to specific DPs.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 12:56 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.c
Actually, just to be clear, you can run as many guest VMs as you want - there's
no technical limit. The difference is in how many guest Windows Server OSes are
automatically licensed or covered without additional cost by the host's
license. 2 for Standard and unlimited for Datacenter. You can ac
Sorry to be blunt here, but isn't that what you are getting *paid* to provide?
And you're asking folks here for this for free?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of STEPHEN X
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:35 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitf
If you know the MAC address, which you clearly do because you're importing
them, then you can easily do that using the MDT database.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 12:51 PM
To: mssms
robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com<mailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com>
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 2:06 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@
Just the system container. You can safely delete everything in there and
ConfigMgr (the current site) will (re-)create what it needs (restarting the
site component manager [I think] will force this quicker also).
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
site code and I should be good
then?
Ryan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 12:44 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
KISS
Assuming you have one DP for every one of those locations, then yes, this is
perfect.
There are various reason to potential add or change this up, but keeping it
simply like this is generally the best route.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] O
Not until CU3 for SP1 is released:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2013/09/16/support-questions-about-win-8.1-and-winsvr-2012-r2-for-configmgr-and-endpoint-protection.aspx
J
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] O
>From
>http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj822981.aspx#BKMK_PlanningR2Upgrade:
"Configuration Manager supports installing System Center 2012 R2 Configuration
Manager to upgrade a site that runs Configuration Manager SP1. You can run the
upgrade on the site servers of central administra
You won't be able to use the same WDS instance for anything other than
ConfigMgr purposes.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Robertson, Casey
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:55 PM
To: mssms@lists.myITforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Co-e
In HTTP client mode, clients use self-signed (self-generated) certs for
authentication and signing messages.
In HTTPS client mode, these are both valid also as well as transferring content
(including policies) securely - this requires PKI generated certs.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
rio. I think personally this is a
great application of the tool. I am using similar to migrate objects from POC
to DEV to PROD environments.
The unleashed book is really good, has a great migration chapter:
http://www.amazon.com/System-Center-Configuration-Manager-Unleashed/dp/0672334372
Maybe Jason
I've never tried the registry values, but there are command-line switches to
rc.exe in 2007 that tell rc.exe which site server (sms provider actually as
these are almost always assumed to be the same) to use to check permissions and
send auditing info. Just run rc.exe at the command-line. I *thi
Not sure what magic you are expecting here. You either bring the horse to the
trough or the trough to the horse. Using the Internet, is generally not viable
because of the time it takes to download the image (among other things).
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.m
Set your WUA to Disabled.
(Not Configured = Enabled)
Problem solved.
http://blog.configmgrftw.com/?p=88
http://blog.configmgrftw.com/?p=89
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 3:08 PM
To:
Server 2012 R2 is *not* a service pack for Server 2012. It is a new version and
upgrading the OS version is place for any ConfigMgr site server or site system
has never been and is not supported.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of JRIT
S
a great migration chapter:
http://www.amazon.com/System-Center-Configuration-Manager-Unleashed/dp/0672334372
Maybe Jason (Sandys) can tell you where to get the eBook version
Von: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] Im Au
4:05 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 SUP/WSUS and GPO... grr!
Jason I didn't need my glasses to read that page, thanks!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of J
all the comments.
Kevin
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE:
ad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 11:05 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] PullDP
You can use BUTS
You can use BUTS throttling though. Remember that BUTS throttling is not
specific to ConfigMgr. You can use Group Policy (domain or local) to throttle
it.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Schwan, Phil
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 1
Ccmsetup is *not* the client agent installer so that's not indicative of
anything. Ccmsetup is simply a bootstrapper that initiates the download and
installation of pre-reqs and the client itself (which is done by client.msi).
See Todd's answer for updating the clients to CU3 (from SP1).
J
Fro
1 - 100 of 860 matches
Mail list logo
