Re: highlighting messages to/cc me on mailing list?

On 13May2024 10:49, Joe Damato via Mutt-users wrote: And now when I switch to the netdev directory within mutt (by pressing c), I can easily see any messages that mention my email address in any thread on the list. Late to the thread, and purely for interest: this is what I use

Re: highlighting messages to/cc me on mailing list?

use is a folder hook: > > http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#folder-hook Thanks that worked perfectly. Just incase anyone stumbles on this thread later, here's what I ended up doing in my muttrc to help manage email for the netdev kernel mailing list with my gmail account: 1. My company uses gmail

Re: highlighting messages to/cc me on mailing list?

In days of yore (Sun, 12 May 2024), Joe Damato via Mutt-users thus quoth: > I am subscribed to some high traffic email lists (linux kernel development > stuff). > > There are two cases I am trying to deal with which are fairly similar: > > 1. I am subscribed to a mai

Re: highlighting messages to/cc me on mailing list?

On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 04:49:45PM -0700, Joe Damato via Mutt-users wrote: A follow up question: is there a way to apply this to only specific imap directories? What you now want to use is a folder hook: http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#folder-hook signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: highlighting messages to/cc me on mailing list?

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:13:47AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote: > Hello Joe, > > Il 12 maggio 2024 alle 14:47 Joe Damato via Mutt-users ha scritto: > > Is there any way to get mutt to highlight/colorize/mark or somehow > > indicate to me messages which specifically have my email in the TO or CC

Re: highlighting messages to/cc me on mailing list?

Hello Joe, Il 12 maggio 2024 alle 14:47 Joe Damato via Mutt-users ha scritto: > Is there any way to get mutt to highlight/colorize/mark or somehow > indicate to me messages which specifically have my email in the TO or CC > line so that I don't miss those? This is what I do. First you add a

highlighting messages to/cc me on mailing list?

similar: 1. I am subscribed to a mailing list. I start a thread (usually with git send-email) on the list and other developers on the list reply via "reply-all". Since they reply-all, their message will contain the email list I am subscribed to and my personal email add

Re: Why Mail-Followup-To header for a non-list address?

On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 06:25:57PM +0800, "Kevin J. McCarthy" wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 03:53:09PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote: > > I don't have any "lists" commands. I do have a "subscribe" command > > which refers to mailing lists by their aliases. One of the aliases > > is

Re: Why Mail-Followup-To header for a non-list address?

On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 03:53:09PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote: I don't have any "lists" commands. I do have a "subscribe" command which refers to mailing lists by their aliases. One of the aliases is "debian" and the email address in question does contain "+debian" but that shouldn't

Why Mail-Followup-To header for a non-list address?

Hi, Someone recently emailed me. Technically it was a reply to an old email of mine. Since then, a few emails have gone back and forth between us. All of my outgoing mails to this one address have had a Mail-Followup-To header added. I have no idea why. The address isn't mentioned in any

Turning off 'Sender' header for mailing list

Hi Everyone, Recently Gmail has started bouncing emails with any DKIM failures. One source of these failures is the: 'Sender: Mutt-users ' header added by the mailing list. I realize some of you may be filtering based on that header, but I'm seeing a large number of bounce-unsubscribes

Re: mailing list config - two questions

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:46:04PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > When is it useful to have a mailing list to which > you are not subscribed "known"? IIRC, the original purpose was mostly to setup the (not ever ratified as a real standard, and not commonly used now) mail

mailing list config - two questions

While researching my response in another topic I came across the "subscribe" list that I don't recall seeing previously. I've been using the "lists" list for the same purpose. As I read it, "lists" items are known mailing lists and possibly subscribed to while &

Re: list messages with emojis in subject line? 

Il 05 febbraio 2021 alle 12:25 Will Yardley ha scritto: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:12:32AM -0800, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: > > What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the > > subject line? > > > > For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly > >

Re: list messages with emojis in subject line? 

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:12:32AM -0800, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: > What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the > subject line? > > For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly > filter them out. Seems like that might be challenging - even if Mutt

list messages with emojis in subject line?

What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the subject line? For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly filter them out. thanks Alex

Re: hi -- new list member

Hello meine, Il 19 gennaio 2021 alle 20:31 meine ha scritto: > hi, > > I want to share a short introduction as a new list member. > > Am a mutt user since about 10 years after discovering the beauty and > power of using CLI. Maybe not a 'power user' knowing all possibi

Re: hi -- new list member

Welkom Meine! Glad to hear you enjoy using mutt. If you have any questions, feel free to ask here. If someone else has questions and you know (part of) the answer, your input is greatly appreciated. Kind regards, Remco

hi -- new list member

hi, I want to share a short introduction as a new list member. Am a mutt user since about 10 years after discovering the beauty and power of using CLI. Maybe not a 'power user' knowing all possibilities, but just practical -- mutt is my email work horse. I use mutt on FreeBSD, partly in bare

Re: Google Groups mailing list autodetection

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 01:40:42PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: [snip] This looks like an old bug in Mutt's List-Post parser. Feel free to open a gitlab ticket. Regardless, I'll add to my todo list and make sure this fix is in the next release. I can certainly do that if it will assist

Re: Google Groups mailing list autodetection

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:45:13PM -0400, Logan Rathbone wrote: With most any mailing list I've subscribed to, I've been able to use the L shortcut to list-reply and the mailing list has been auto-detected by mutt just fine. However, with one list, which is managed by Google Groups as I

Google Groups mailing list autodetection

With most any mailing list I've subscribed to, I've been able to use the L shortcut to list-reply and the mailing list has been auto-detected by mutt just fine. However, with one list, which is managed by Google Groups as I understand, is not. Here is the List-Post header, redacted so

Re: Unsubscribing from mailing-list threads (was: Preferred way to get imap emails)

On 2019-07-30, José María Mateos wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote: > >> You may want to examine some netnews clients for ideas. They tend to >> have exactly this: a database of killed threads, easily augmented with >> a simple keystroke. > > This. Having used

Re: Unsubscribing from mailing-list threads (was: Preferred way to get imap emails)

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote: > You may want to examine some netnews clients for ideas. They tend to > have exactly this: a database of killed threads, easily augmented with > a simple keystroke. This. Having used slrn in the past, I was surprised mutt didn't have

Re: Unsubscribing from mailing-list threads (was: Preferred way to get imap emails)

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día martes, julio 30, 2019 a las 06:36:35a. m. +0200, Francesco Ariis > escribió: > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > > > > I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a

Re: Unsubscribing from mailing-list threads (was: Preferred way to get imap emails)

On Jul 30, 2019 at 7:40, Matthias Apitz wrote: A solution must be based on some kind of a local "database" file of threads marked as "bad" threads (perhaps as patterns) and one must actively store the given "bad" thread into it, for example with M and then a D would later, even in the next

Re: Unsubscribing from mailing-list threads (was: Preferred way to get imap emails)

to it, for example with M and then a D would > later, even in the next mutt session, read this "database" file and delete > all threads from the actual mailbox for all patterns in it. Useful remarks! Indeed a 100% solution *has* to pass from some kind of database/list of good/bad threads. For not, marking a message as "important" saves the thread (even if broken) from touch/delete; this alleviates the pain in some cases. -F

Re: Unsubscribing from mailing-list threads (was: Preferred way to get imap emails)

El día martes, julio 30, 2019 a las 06:36:35a. m. +0200, Francesco Ariis escribió: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > > I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a feature in > > mutt to mark a given thread as "do not present any mail of

Unsubscribing from mailing-list threads (was: Preferred way to get imap emails)

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a feature in > mutt to mark a given thread as "do not present any mail of this thread > anymore, just collapse them and mark for deletion on exit". > > This is such a

Re: Subscribing to Discourse emails (mailing-list mode)

On 05Jul2019 10:05, Cameron Simpson wrote: It occurs to me now that if you want greater precision than: ! ~f discourse you could make an address group and go: ! ~f %discourse and maintain a small alias group thus: alias -group discourse discourse \ Haskell Discourse List , \ Some Other

Re: Subscribing to Discourse emails (mailing-list mode)

thus: alias -group discourse discourse \ Haskell Discourse List , \ Some Other Discourse List I find groups quite handy, for example tuning for HTML vs plain text: # prefer plain text message-hook . 'unalternative_order *; alternative_order text/plain text/html' # senders who can't s

Re: Subscribing to Discourse emails (mailing-list mode)

On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 09:49:34AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > Maybe beef up the limit? Untested: > > folder-hook fa-ml 'push !~l | ~f discou...@haskell.org' Indeed that is a simple and sensible solution. I post the actual pattern I used here, for future reference: folder-hook fa-ml

Re: Subscribing to Discourse emails (mailing-list mode)

On 14Jun2019 08:05, Francesco Ariis wrote: I recently joined a Discourse server and chose "Mailing List mode" [1] to receive one mail per post. This is mutt-friendly but alas I cannot seem to find a way to `subscribe` to Discourse like I would with a normal mailing list (e.g.

Subscribing to Discourse emails (mailing-list mode)

Hello mutters, I recently joined a Discourse server and chose "Mailing List mode" [1] to receive one mail per post. This is mutt-friendly but alas I cannot seem to find a way to `subscribe` to Discourse like I would with a normal mailing list (e.g. `subscribe discou...@haskell.

Re: save and select from mailbox list

gt; my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of > course I can't get past without first entering a folder at the > prompt. I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me for the mailbox name, '?' brought up the full list. What am I missing? A

Re: save and select from mailbox list

t; > my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of > > course I can't get past without first entering a folder at > > the > > prompt. > > I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me > for the mailbox name, '?' brought up the fu

Re: save and select from mailbox list

hout first entering a folder at the > prompt. I had the cursor on your message, in the index, and hit 's' -- it prompted me for the mailbox name, '?' brought up the full list. What am I missing? That sounds like what you want. -- ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. F

save and select from mailbox list

Hi if i have a mail selected in the index and want to save and then be prompted to select one of my mailboxes, how can this be done? my first attempt was a macro with "?", but of course I can't get past without first entering a folder at the prompt. thanks, -- Ben Fitzgerald

Re: mailing list hook

On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:58:31PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-10-07 22:45, Ben Fitzgerald wrote: > > > when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to > > reply to the mailing list. All great. > > In fact the "lists" command

Re: mailing list hook

On 2018-10-07 22:45, Ben Fitzgerald wrote: > when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to > reply to the mailing list. All great. In fact the "lists" command is not relevant or necessary for this. List reply simply selects the address in the List-

mailing list hook

Hi, when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to reply to the mailing list. All great. When I select a folder for a given mailing list and then want to mail the start of a new thread, simply hitting "m" (bound to ) ought, in my mind, to auto-populate the mail

Re: Mailing list status

On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 08:09:21PM +0100, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2018-03-12, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few > > things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues. > > The web archive for t

Re: Mailing list status

On 2018-03-12, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few > things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues. I only noticed this now. As far as I can tell, it hasn't been mentioned here yet: (I might have overlooke

Problem with index list on a certain mailing list

ias defined for it. I have aliases for all the lists I'm subscribed to, made from the part of the address before the '@'. EG alias mutt-users "Mutt Users" etc. This is done automagically via a macro+shell script whenever I subscribe to a new list, or unsubscribe and remove an old one. I

Re: no "on behalf of" me in my reply to mailing list

e envelope sender? -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.

Re: no "on behalf of" me in my reply to mailing list

On 07/24/2018 05:01 PM, Erik Christiansen wrote: On 24.07.18 15:32, Hang Yuan wrote: So sounds it's my email client's problem which can't show email header correctly? I can see you email address but can't see my address displayed in my reply. Instead, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org is showed.

Re: no "on behalf of" me in my reply to mailing list

On 24.07.18 15:32, Hang Yuan wrote: > So sounds it's my email client's problem which can't show email header > correctly? I can see you email address but can't see my address > displayed in my reply. Instead, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org is showed. Your post shows here as: >From

Re: no "on behalf of" me in my reply to mailing list

On 07/24/2018 01:48 PM, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:31:43PM +0800, Hang Yuan wrote: On 07/24/2018 01:27 PM, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org wrote: I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see

Re: no "on behalf of" me in my reply to mailing list

On 07/24/2018 02:17 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: On 2018-07-24 13:31, Hang Yuan wrote: I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email address like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the rece

Re: no "on behalf of" me in my reply to mailing list

On 2018-07-24 13:31, Hang Yuan wrote: > > I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email > > from mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email > > address like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the > > re

Re: no "on behalf of" me in my reply to mailing list

On 07/24/2018 01:27 PM, mutt-users-boun...@mutt.org wrote: I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email address like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the received email. If I only

no "on behalf of" me in my reply to mailing list

I use mutt + msmtp to send email. But I find when I reply an email from mailing list, others in the mailing list will not see my email address like "on behalf of hang.y...@linux.intel.com" in the received email. If I only send email to an individual, the email head is correct with

OT: Perl [Was: mailing-list to bugs]

mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.

Re: mailing-list to bugs

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:00:59PM -0400, jr wrote: > > There are lots of libraries for doing this in lots of languages (python, > > go, perl, ).  Using mutt would be harder > > than needed for most tasks unless you don't know how to program at all. > > i was hoping for C. found libcmime but

Re: mailing-list to bugs

On 08.05.18 20:46, Derek Martin wrote: > I dare say no one should want to work in Perl anymore... It's such a > horrible mishmash of a lanugage. +1 > But C is probably not the best tool for this job either. Python has > modules for handling e-mail and for talking to bugzilla, and for my >

Re: mailing-list to bugs

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 04:54:30PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > > i am looking for a library to parse email messages. [...] > What you want for bugzilla is probably > > https://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.0/html/api/email_in.html > > and you probably want to work in Perl. I dare say no one should

Re: mailing-list to bugs

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 04:54:30PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:21:01PM -0400, jrun wrote: > > > > i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write > > something to parse incoming emails on our mailing-list and create bug

Re: mailing-list to bugs

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:09:42PM +0200, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: > On 08/05/18 20:21, jrun wrote: > > ...posted this earlier on #neomutt... > > > > hello, > > > > i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write > > something to pa

Re: mailing-list to bugs

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:21:01PM -0400, jrun wrote: > > i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write > something to parse incoming emails on our mailing-list and create bugs in > bugzilla out of them and possibly appending to the existing bug. btw,

Re: mailing-list to bugs

On 08/05/18 20:21, jrun wrote: ...posted this earlier on #neomutt... hello, i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write something to parse incoming emails on our mailing-list and create bugs in bugzilla out of them and possibly appending to the existing bug. btw

mailing-list to bugs

...posted this earlier on #neomutt... hello, i am looking for a library to parse email messages. i'm assigned to write something to parse incoming emails on our mailing-list and create bugs in bugzilla out of them and possibly appending to the existing bug. btw, how would you do this? would you

Re: is it possible to auto-detect mailing list?

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:56:05AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > > Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example, > > "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to

Re: is it possible to auto-detect mailing list?

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:17:22PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Tom Furie [04-20-18 18:54]: > > The subscription file could be sourced by .muttrc. Of course, changes > > won't be reflected until mutt is restarted. > no, simply, :source will do it. Okay, thank you. Of

Re: is it possible to auto-detect mailing list?

* Tom Furie <t...@furie.org.uk> [04-20-18 18:54]: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > > > Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example, > > "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark t

Re: is it possible to auto-detect mailing list?

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example, > "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as > subscribed (as if we have used `subscribe

Re: is it possible to auto-detect mailing list?

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example, > "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as > subscribed (as if we have used `subscribe

Re: is it possible to auto-detect mailing list?

On 20Apr2018 22:46, Yubin Ruan <ablacktsh...@gmail.com> wrote: Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example, "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as subscribed (as if we have used `subscribe l.

is it possible to auto-detect mailing list?

Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example, "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as subscribed (as if we have used `subscribe l...@address.org' in .muttrc), such that there is a 'L' flag showing up in the index? Yubin

Re: Mailing list status

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:23:13AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: >:0 > * ^List-Post: .*mutt-users@(osuosl|mutt)\.org >.mutt-users/ Thanks Will, I was hoping to get this back from my mail :) --strk;

Re: Mailing list status

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote: > What I use for procmail (if anyone finds it useful): > > :0 > * ^List-Post: .*mutt-users@mutt.org > .mutt-users/ > > :0 > * ^List-Post: .*mutt-us...@osuosl.org > .mutt-users/ Don't forget

Re: Mailing list status

> > > errant http://mutt.org/mailman) links. I think they have accidentally > > > goofed up the list ids and headers in the process. I've let them know > > > about the problem - sorry for the confusion. > > > > Replying to myself to check the headers. Please p

Re: Mailing list status

y > > goofed up the list ids and headers in the process. I've let them know > > about the problem - sorry for the confusion. > > Replying to myself to check the headers. Please pardon the noise. well, FWIW, I just happened to have set procmail to use a header that (so far) remai

Re: Mailing list status

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:39:47PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > OSUOSL is making some adjustments to the lists right now (to fix the > errant http://mutt.org/mailman) links. I think they have accidentally > goofed up the list ids and headers in the process. I've let them kno

Re: Mailing list status

ings need > to be updated? I already saw three different List-Id settings in the last two days now: * mutt-users.mutt.org * mutt-users.osuosl.org * mutt-users.lists.mutt.org I added all of those to my exim forward filter rules, but I would appreciate if this could settle to some final value soon. ;-)

Re: Mailing list status

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:29:10PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 13.03.18 08:31, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > On 12Mar2018 12:31, Kevin J. McCarthy <ke...@8t8.us> wrote: > > > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few > > > things

Re: Mailing list status

On 13.03.18 08:31, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 12Mar2018 12:31, Kevin J. McCarthy <ke...@8t8.us> wrote: > > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few > > things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues. > > I notice that

Re: Mailing list status

first >> time ever, I received a few emails from this mailing list. > > Sorry about that. Yes, the 'nomail' and 'digest' options were lost, and > I have no way to retrieve them. I'll have to ask for your forgiveness > and request you manually re-enable those settings for your accou

Re: Mailing list status

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:01:08PM +, Nuno Silva wrote: > It looks like the "nomail" subscription setting was lost in this > transition. > > I have been subscribed that way for some time and today, for the first > time ever, I received a few emails from this m

Re: Mailing list status

On 2018-03-12, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Last Friday night, our mailing list and website server suffered a > catastrophic failure. > > Fortunately, for the past couple months I have already been working on > moving our mailing lists to OSUOSL. I had planned a couple more steps

Re: Mailing list status

On 12Mar2018 12:31, Kevin J. McCarthy <ke...@8t8.us> wrote: Last Friday night, our mailing list and website server suffered a catastrophic failure. Fortunately, for the past couple months I have already been working on moving our mailing lists to OSUOSL. I had planned a couple more

Re: Mailing list status

Hello Kevin, thanks for the hard work. On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:31:34PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few > things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues. 1. The listinfo URL > http:/

Mailing list status

Hi Everyone, Last Friday night, our mailing list and website server suffered a catastrophic failure. Fortunately, for the past couple months I have already been working on moving our mailing lists to OSUOSL. I had planned a couple more steps to transition smoothly, but given the failure have

Re: How to prevent 'List Reply' from sending to more than one address

On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 03:22:16PM +, Chris Green wrote: > I am on a mailing list which has (presumably for historical reasons) > two addresses. Sometimes messages arrive with *both* of the addresses > in a format which mutt sees as the list address. Thus, when I use >

How to prevent 'List Reply' from sending to more than one address

I am on a mailing list which has (presumably for historical reasons) two addresses. Sometimes messages arrive with *both* of the addresses in a format which mutt sees as the list address. Thus, when I use 'List Reply' the outgoing E-Mail preserves the duplication and my E-Mail to the list

Re: Mailing list folders

On 2016-11-02, Mihail Konev <k@ya.ru> wrote: > What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a > dedicated folder? I used to use procmail for this. Now I use slrn and news.gmane.org instead. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow

Re: Mailing list folders

On 02Nov2016 08:08, Mihail Konev <k@ya.ru> wrote: What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a dedicated folder? Right now I'm using folder-hook +INBOX 'macro index \Cw "T~h \"To: mailing-list\";s\Cu=mailing-list$"' i.e. tag ev

Re: Mailing list folders

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 08:08:32AM +0500, Mihail Konev wrote: Hi list, What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a dedicated folder? Right now I'm using folder-hook +INBOX 'macro index \Cw "T~h \"To: mailing-list\";s\Cu=mailing-list$"'

Re: Mailing list folders

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 08:08:32AM +0500, Mihail Konev wrote: > Hi list, > > What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a > dedicated folder? > > Right now I'm using > > folder-hook +INBOX 'macro index \Cw "T~h \"To: > mailing-lis

Re: Mailing list folders

* Mihail Konev <k@ya.ru> [11-01-16 23:15]: > Hi list, > > What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a > dedicated folder? I prefer procmail. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org

Mailing list folders

Hi list, What is the supposed way of keeping messages from a mailing list in a dedicated folder? Right now I'm using folder-hook +INBOX 'macro index \Cw "T~h \"To: mailing-list\";s\Cu=mailing-list$"' i.e. tag everything "To: mailing-list", then move all tagg

Re: [SPAM?] Re: list-reply without Cc?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:42:10PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote: >> I don't know if this is relevant: the list is not a real list with >> appropriate headers, and most of the people use poorly-designed MUA >&

[SPAM?] Re: list-reply without Cc?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote: > I don't know if this is relevant: the list is not a real list with > appropriate headers, and most of the people use poorly-designed MUA > (no Mail-Followup-To, etc.). To be fair, Mail-Followup-To was never turned into a

Re: list-reply without Cc?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote: > Thanks Ben, but I realize my question was not accurate. I am > disappointed by having recipients in Cc when I use list-reply on my > own messages (match alternates). > > Ex: > - I am subscribed to a list (wit

Re: list-reply without Cc?

Thanks Ben, but I realize my question was not accurate. I am disappointed by having recipients in Cc when I use list-reply on my own messages (match alternates). Ex: - I am subscribed to a list (with mutt's subscribe command), - I have sent a message to A (not in the list), Cc the list and B, - I

Re: list-reply without Cc?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:43:01AM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a way to reply to a subscribed list without anybody in copy? > I often receive messages from someone not subscribed, then want to > answer to the list only (and sometimes forget to remove the

list-reply without Cc?

Hello, Is there a way to reply to a subscribed list without anybody in copy? I often receive messages from someone not subscribed, then want to answer to the list only (and sometimes forget to remove the people in Cc). -- Gabriel

Re: crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:12:52AM +0200, Steve Schmerler wrote: > On Jul 27 19:19 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Thanks! I'll give gpgme a spin. I didn't find that much documentation, > though. I only need to set > > crypt_use_gpgme > crypt_use_pka You only really need to set

Re: crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

On Jul 27 19:19 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > I think I see the problem. Mutt is using a fixed buffer of size 1024 > when expanding the %r parameter. I think when the system was designed, > no one anticipated expanding 50+ keys in a single gpg invocation. :-) Yes, I was suspecting

Re: crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:43:41PM +0200, Steve Schmerler wrote: > * stops at the third[**] key 74464897317CDA88 (length 16) and > * passes a truncated version 74464897317CDA (length 14) to pgpewrap > > which then gives me a "gpg: skipped: Invalid user ID". The related pgp > setting is > >

crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

-hook mailing.l...@company.com FECEC90758BB1D95 crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com 866BAB720X7E9L98 Running this with mutt -d2, I see in the debug log that the list of recipients is passed to pgpewrap, but truncated as follows (lines broken): [2016-07-26 14:49:12] mutt_pgp_command: /usr/lib/mutt

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >