On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:58:20PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
You might consider looking at tmux as a replacement for screen. I find
it much more robust and the learning curve is not much. It makes some of
screen's *features* more functional such as split screen w/o using one of
the
* Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com [03-31-10 11:46]:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:58:20PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
You might consider looking at tmux as a replacement for screen. I find
it much more robust and the learning curve is not much. It makes some of
screen's
On Mar 30, 2010 at 08:58 PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
You might consider looking at tmux as a replacement for screen.
I tried out tmux a couple months ago after hearing good things about it.
After some annoyances with it (which I've now forgotten the specifics
about), I decided to
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:05:26PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
I think you can do all of your first idea with a macro. The basic
idea is:
It won't do:
[...]
5. Execute a script as you did before to start mutt on that
postponed message.
First, this is a bad UI since I'll have to hit
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:11:40PM -0700, George Davidovich wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something here, but wouldn't temporarily resetting
mutt's `sendmail' variable to a custom mailer (a variation on the OP's
script, perhaps) take care of the replied flag issue?
No. The sendmail thing comes too
On 29Mar2010 17:19, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
| I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
| this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
Here's what I do:
set edit_headers=yes
set editor=muttedit
set autoedit=yes
Muttedit is here
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 29Mar2010 17:19, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
| I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
| this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
Here's what I do:
set
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
If I complete the reply immediately (as now), it's all seamless.
But if I want to defer the reply for later, I simply detach from screen
and reattach later.
On 30Mar2010 10:43, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| On 29Mar2010 17:19, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
| | I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems
On 30Mar2010 11:11, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| If I complete the reply immediately (as now), it's all seamless.
|
| But if I want
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:44:09AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 30Mar2010 11:11, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| If I complete the
On 30Mar2010 17:51, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
| That's surprising; it suggests your $TERM isn't set up right outside
| mutt.
|
| It's a terminfo / libslang issue.
Lucky the screen internal terminal and xterm both base off the ANSI
stuff, eh?
| | screen -ls output
| |
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:44:35AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 30Mar2010 17:51, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
| That's surprising; it suggests your $TERM isn't set up right outside
| mutt.
|
| It's a terminfo / libslang issue.
Lucky the screen internal terminal
* Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com [03-30-10 20:53]:
Thanks for your script and usage info,
You might consider looking at tmux as a replacement for screen. I find
it much more robust and the learning curve is not much. It makes some of
screen's *features* more functional such as
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:58:20PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com [03-30-10 20:53]:
Thanks for your script and usage info,
You might consider looking at tmux as a replacement for screen. I find
it much more robust and the learning curve is
I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
The best I could do was to create an index macro that pipes the current
message to a script that then: a) pipes stdin to formail, b) saves the
result in a tmp file, c) starts
On 2010-03-29, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
The best I could do was to create an index macro that pipes the current
message to a script
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:05:26PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-29, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
The best I could do was to create an index
on
local folders?
Also, /etc/fstab mount options that might affect this are:
/dev/sda2 / ext3noatime 0 0
(I see this is already a FAQ as well as within other posts, but
likely omits some specific details mentioned here.)
--
Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
, /etc/fstab mount options that might affect this are:
/dev/sda2 / ext3noatime 0 0
(I see this is already a FAQ as well as within other posts, but
likely omits some specific details mentioned here.)
--
Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
savanna wrote:
In the FAQ there's a procmail recipe for converting old style pgp
signatures to new style multi-part mime. The very first line should
indicate that it's a filter recipe, not a delivery recipe:
ie
:0 f
and not
:0
In this way all messages can be filtered before
--
Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mail/notification.html
Mail Notification FAQ - which programs notify you about new mail?
Sample setups welcome!
configured wrong? Please advise.
RFC2015. Pine needs an upgrade. This is a FAQ! Fefe - please add!
Sven
On Apr 08, fEd Franks [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
The FAQ found at the website URL:
http://www/fefe/de/muttfaq/faq.html
has a broken link... Under How can I report bugs?, the link check
Sven's giantlist of known bugs gets me an HTML error:
Forbidden
...
I would like to know if my
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:58:12AM -0600, Charles Curley decreed:
[snip]
If you have the cygwin tools, you might see if the regular mutt
tarball will compile there.
http://www.cygwin.com
[snip]
FWIW - Cygwin actually provides a pre-build mutt in their normal setup.
You may have to click on
Steve Cooper [Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 11:08:13AM +]:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:58:12AM -0600, Charles Curley decreed:
[snip]
If you have the cygwin tools, you might see if the regular mutt
tarball will compile there.
http://www.cygwin.com
[snip]
FWIW - Cygwin actually provides
On 25, Sep, 2001 at 08:48:07AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
David T-G mutt [24/09/01 20:48 -0400]:
% Now, what do I do? Clearsign / encrypt it in the vim buffer itself?
Use Shane's pgp_outlook_compat patch, as I've plugged here before.
I use freebsd's port collection - I'll see
Morten Liebach mutt [25/09/01 09:27 +0200]:
I think you can make patch, then apply your 3rd party patch, and then
a make install.
I'll see if I can contact the patch maintainer and move it into the freebsd
ports tree. I'd hate to do it everytime I cvsup and install a new mutt.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:48:37PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% Known issue: Outlook and Eudora (for example) barf on pgp-mime.
Yep.
[SNIP]
Use Shane's pgp_outlook_compat patch, as I've plugged here before.
Well, o.k. thanks... But two questions:
- Where can I get the patch?
- If
Suresh, et al --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% Hi
Hi!
%
% Known issue: Outlook and Eudora (for example) barf on pgp-mime.
Yep.
%
...
% either ... they'd prefer
%
% Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
% Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
%
% Now, what do I do?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:48:37PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% Known issue: Outlook and Eudora (for example) barf on pgp-mime.
Yep.
[SNIP]
Use Shane's pgp_outlook_compat patch, as I've plugged here before.
Well, o.k. thanks... But two questions:
- Where can I get the patch?
- If
David T-G mutt [24/09/01 20:48 -0400]:
% Now, what do I do? Clearsign / encrypt it in the vim buffer itself?
Use Shane's pgp_outlook_compat patch, as I've plugged here before.
I use freebsd's port collection - I'll see if I can work this into the port
I'm running.
-suresh
PGP
Bruno Postle mutt [24/09/01 21:03 +0100]:
That would be the right way to do it. I do it the wrong way in mutt :-),
when I need to communicate with the nic.uk robot (it requires all sorts
of annoying pgp things) I use:
macro compose S Fgpg -a --clearsign -u 0x82C08753
And to encrypt /
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:12:23AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Hi
Known issue: Outlook and Eudora (for example) barf on pgp-mime.
Now, what do I do? Clearsign / encrypt it in the vim buffer itself?
I do this frequently with vim, myself. The biggest drawback is you
need to know
Derek --
...and then Derek D. Martin said...
% On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:48:37PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% % Known issue: Outlook and Eudora (for example) barf on pgp-mime.
%
% Yep.
% [SNIP]
% Use Shane's pgp_outlook_compat patch, as I've plugged here before.
%
% Well, o.k. thanks...
* Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] [23/10/00, 13:47:56]:
I can understand people that would prefer a low-powered
editor like Pico versus something more sophisticated like Vi or Emacs
because the former is just easier to use and configure, while the latter
requires semi-programmers to be
Mikko Hänninen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Pekka Savola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 20 Oct 2000:
Anyway, I was wondering if there is a Pine-to-Mutt conversion HOWTO or FAQ.
I've not heard of one, but I never did use Pine much so I haven't even
looked, or paid much attention
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 11:27:17AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
[Pine-to-Mutt HOWTO or FAQ]
: Mutt-Newbie list? hint, hint I'll write a bit of this if possible but
: there's already a page at http://www.socha.net with pine (and another with
: gnus) tips, so if Sven and Robin Socha
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 01:47:56PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
One of my friends who loves his Pine tried out Mutt and hates it,
because Mutt doesn't have a GUI method of configuring its settings the
way Pine does. I can understand people that would prefer a low-powered
Unless things have
in
an xterm. I was using pico for mutt for quite a long time till I saw the light
(Glory! Hallelujah!) and started using vim ;) That's one thing we _have_ to
stress in the FAQ - just because vi[m] is the default editor doesn't mean that
you are stuck with it.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus
Hi,
I've been trying to get used to Mutt. It's not too easy when you have like
5 years of Pine experience behind you.
Anyway, I was wondering if there is a Pine-to-Mutt conversion HOWTO or FAQ.
I'm _sure_ that would be needed. I sure as hell needed one myself, and had
to go through
Pekka Savola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 20 Oct 2000:
Anyway, I was wondering if there is a Pine-to-Mutt conversion HOWTO or FAQ.
I've not heard of one, but I never did use Pine much so I haven't even
looked, or paid much attention.
I'm _sure_ that would be needed.
Right, one would
Suresh --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
%
% Are you sure that shouldn't be 2775 instead? I don't think we need
% stickiness, but to ensure that only root and mail can write in there...
%
% Not the mailboxes - the directory
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, David T-G wrote:
"overly restirctive" eh?
new reason to switch to mutt - pine is a security risk :^)
% permissions on the spool directory for running Pine are 1777, i.e.
% read-write-execute permission for everyone, with the sticky-bit set, so only
% owners
I suspect this is an FAQ. However, I couldn't
find the answer. On Tru64 (Digital Unix) I
configured mutt with --enable-flock --disable-fcntl
together, only one of them as well as without either
of them. In all cases, when I read my mail with
the resulting executable and try to save a message,
I
Bharadwaj --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% I suspect this is an FAQ. However, I couldn't
It very well might be :-)
% find the answer. On Tru64 (Digital Unix) I
% configured mutt with --enable-flock --disable-fcntl
% together, only one of them as well as without either
Sure; those
David,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Although this was happenning on mailboxes that
live in my user area and that have the right
permissions, setting execute premissions of
mutt_dotlock (they were not set initially)
did the trick.
Thanks again,
Bharadwaj
(Mutt can bounce AND thread!!
Time
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
and that means that only root and the mail group -- and that probably
means *not* you - can write in there. To get around that but not tie so
much power into mutt itself, there is a little binary called mutt_dotlock
which should be installed with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
(Mutt can bounce AND thread!!
Time has come to abandon ELM !!)
sig fodder, several years ago ;)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
Pardon this fortune.
Suresh --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
%
% and that means that only root and the mail group -- and that probably
%
% Oh - and make sure /var/spool/mail has 1777 permissions.
Are you sure that shouldn't be 2775 instead? I don't
Bharadwaj --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% David,
%
% Thanks for the quick reply.
You're quite welcome.
%
% Although this was happenning on mailboxes that
% live in my user area and that have the right
Really? You mean you had a mailbox in a directory like $HOME/Mail and
the
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Are you sure that shouldn't be 2775 instead? I don't think we need
stickiness, but to ensure that only root and mail can write in there...
Not the mailboxes - the directory /var/spool/mail/ ...
From the pine 4.21 docs ...
In installations like
Bruce DeVisser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 12 Sep 2000:
But suppose I want to pick out one attachment
only from a message, instead of a whole message... is there a way to
do that?
No, currently there is no (direct) way. It would be nice if there was,
yes. I guess it'll only happen if
I have read all the FAQs I can find and searched the man
page but I still have a couple questions.
1. How do you forward a message, including all the attachments
that came with the message? Ideally I would include the forwarded
main message as text and the all the attachments would be auto
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:22:19PM -0700, Chris Chisolm wrote:
I have read all the FAQs I can find and searched the man
page but I still have a couple questions.
1. How do you forward a message, including all the attachments that
came with the message? Ideally I would include the
On 2000.09.12, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Bruce DeVisser" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:22:19PM -0700, Chris Chisolm wrote:
I have read all the FAQs I can find and searched the man
page but I still have a couple questions.
1. How do you forward a message,
Chris Chisolm [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I have read all the FAQs I can find and searched the man
page but I still have a couple questions.
1. How do you forward a message, including all the attachments
that came with the message? Ideally I would include the forwarded
main message as
On 2000.09.12, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Chris Chisolm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. How do you forward a message, including all the attachments
that came with the message? Ideally I would include the forwarded
main message as text and the all the attachments would be auto
loaded as
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:09:23PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
On 2000.09.12, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On a related note, I am wondering if there is a way to add an
attachment consisting of an *attachment* from another email (as
opposed to an *entire* other email).
View attachments,
the documentation?
1) They don't know where it is or even that it exists.
2) They can't understand it or find things in it.
3) They're too lazy or too pressed for time to read it.
I think a FAQ would be a good solution to this. The downside is that
someone has to maintain it. So, is it less
Gary Johnson proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Wow, this is one crazy-looking thread! It's hard to know on which
branch to post a response.
Easy to do - bin all the useless / m3 t00 posts in a long thread and
you'll have something manageable.
I think a FAQ would be a good solution
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 12:03:29PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
: On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:45:07AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote:
:
: Not particularly; I just want to help out the faq project to get some
: quick answers for folks and unclutter the list.
:
: Unclutter the list? Would
Eugene Lee proclaimed on mutt-users that:
I'm also interested in helping out with a Mutt FAQ project. So who's in
charge of the beast? :)
mutt-newbie.sourceforge.net has been set up - I and Mrinal Kalakrishnan
mrinal @ india.com have elected ourselves as sacrificial goats and will
take charge
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 04:01:47PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Why don't you post each FAQ to the list as each one is done (all in
one thread) so that people can suggest changes, as well as track it's
development?
'k. Here (as printed in lynx) is what index.html will look like
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 08:50:54PM -0700, fman wrote:
How do I get started using PGP/GPG with mutt?
try http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Mutt-GnuPG-PGP-HOWTO.html
them to a good tutorial, or at least give directions including how to
generate a key and how to use it.
le summary of why maillist munging is BAD:
http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/faq/maillist.html
Feedback appreciated! :-)
Sven
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 01:10:09AM -0500, Martin Julian DeMello wrote:
Going through the mailing list and the documentation on mutt.org, it strikes
me that what we lack is a 'How do I' FAQ (of the sort perl has). Of course,
it'd be semiredundant informationwise since it's all
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 08:42:35PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 05:32:45PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:47:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
[snip]
I plan to model the planned mutt for dummies [1] on this page.
[1] better not
How do I get started using PGP/GPG with mutt?
try http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Mutt-GnuPG-PGP-HOWTO.html
them to a good tutorial, or at least give directions including how to
generate a key and how to use it.
http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystorysid=2000/5/1/17058/47630
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:47:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
[snip]
I plan to model the planned mutt for dummies [1] on this page.
[1] better not call it that - comdex/idg attorneys will chew my ass off
for copyright violations ;)
[snap]
come to think of it, name it "mutt for
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 05:32:45PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
- On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:47:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
- [snip]
-
- I plan to model the planned mutt for dummies [1] on this page.
-
- [1] better not call it that - comdex/idg attorneys will chew my ass off
- for
a time to really know mutt) - so I thought, as a
newbie, I can do a slightly better job.
No hurry, and I absolutely agree. When you're new, you know the simple,
obvious things that people want to know.
Just came across this _lovely_ FAQ - for PINE, of all things :)
http://www.socha.net/pine
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 07:49:50PM +0200, Norbert Steinl wrote:
If somebody finishes this, I would help to spread it by translating it into
German and put it on my realperformance website.
Need any help? (Or should I write this in German, too?)
Might be, I learn a little bit more about
author(s) of the future FAQ already have two
translators. Feed us with content!
Norbert
--
Norbert Steinl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PHONE: +49 (89) 43549892http://www.mp3-livefestival.de
FAX:+49 (89) 45419246Cell: +49 (172) 8042950
Going through the mailing list and the documentation on mutt.org, it strikes
me that what we lack is a 'How do I' FAQ (of the sort perl has). Of course,
it'd be semiredundant informationwise since it's all there in the manual,
but it'd be a useful resource for the newbie daunted by the sheer mass
Martin Julian DeMello proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Going through the mailing list and the documentation on mutt.org, it strikes
me that what we lack is a 'How do I' FAQ (of the sort perl has). Of course,
Martin - I've been working on something like this (and it's a bit rough
now). I'll
Suresh --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% Martin Julian DeMello proclaimed on mutt-users that:
%
% Going through the mailing list and the documentation on mutt.org, it strikes
% me that what we lack is a 'How do I' FAQ (of the sort perl has). Of course,
%
% Martin - I've been
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [190600 16:42 CET]:
[mutt faq]
Hey, I'm interested :-)
Me too ;-)
%
% it'd be semiredundant informationwise since it's all there in the manual,
% but it'd be a useful resource for the newbie daunted by the sheer mass of
% options and settings to wade
Hi, folks --
I'm [finally!] drafting up a mutt FAQ entry on filtering incoming email
to answer all of those "how do I get mutt to move my mail for me?"
questions. So far, I have found mention of
procmail
maildrop
mailfilter
sieve
exim
though I don't yet have (because I h
The Mutt Users Mailing List FAQ 0.01
Q1: If I want to make sure I get lots of helpful responses to my
questions, even if they aren't really mutt-related, should I write
something like
Please help me, before i've to use PINE or something like that
at the bottom of my message?
A1
that
at the bottom of my message?
I think, your Response isn't also very useful for the List isn't it ? Did
you've some good Ideas, or is the only thing you can help me, your FAQ ???
If so, i think it's very sad...
I still need help ... and I know the Rules of posting, and of course i
didn't NEED the FAQ
On Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 01:58:04PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
P.S.: this is becoming an faq, do we have an active faq maintainer ?
Which brings up the question of what happened to the expected web site
enhancements ?? (www.mutt.org is still listing 0.95.1)
--
Later ...
Rich Roth
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
83 matches
Mail list logo
