On Sat, Feb 9, 2002, Paul Ackersviller wrote:
Sorry for chiming in late on this, but it sounds an lot like what I
saw once when I tried a performance tweak on one of my filesystems.
Some filesystems have a mount option noatime to not update file access
times -- needless to say this is not
On Wed, Feb 6, 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
I just got an email from a nondescript luser asking how I put my replies
after the quote, The Right Way. She uses LookOut, of course, and doesn't
like the default quote style that it uses. She says that the way I do it
is so cool.
I'm going to
On Wed, Feb 6, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Don't know to change or even if they do, can't really. If I started
quoting the right way at work, it would confuse people to no end... they
wouldn't know where to find my response inside of Outlook's awful message
display interface (marking
On Wed, Feb 6, 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Plus when you set quoting to in the options, every time you are
in that dialog box and hit Ok, it will complain. :-/
Really? The messages I get from her seem to be quoted with
properly, she just doesn't know how to actually write a proper
On Sun, Feb 3, 2002, David T-G wrote:
% that the servers run ntp and are synced to within a second. Any other
Good enough (though there have been times that I've had to really badger
my admin to fix ntp when it falls over).
% ideas? I haven't seen it last night, though. And btw,
On Sun, Feb 3, 2002, David T-G wrote:
When you do see it, try
ls -l --fulltime folderfile
ls -lu --fulltime folderfile
to see the differences. See if they make sense.
It's happening again. Weird that ls --help shows --fulltime, but on
the command line is says it's an invalid
On Sun, Feb 3, 2002, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
ls -l --fulltime folderfile
ls -lu --fulltime folderfile
It's happening again. Weird that ls --help shows --fulltime, but on
the command line is says it's an invalid option. :-/ Anyway,
'ls -lu's output time is 2 minutes
On Sat, Feb 2, 2002, David T-G wrote:
I'd check the times, then. Log in on the server and check the date and
then, as simultaneously as possible, check the date on your workstation.
If they're more than a second or so off, you can have problems (and
everyone running make in your
On Sat, Feb 2, 2002, David T-G wrote:
Speaking of landing in a new city, does anyone need a hot SysAdmin? I'm
on the market again... Ken, perhaps you should forward my address to
your IT department ;-)
What the one of my former employer? I'll send your resume to the NYS
Dept. of
Is there some weirdness that may happen with mutt run from my home dir
which is NFS mounted? Not sure what the correlation would be, but I
find that after I have been in a mailbox, once in another, sometimes
mutt will tell me there is new mail in tha tmailbox, but going there,
there is no new
On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
Since NFS's locking mechanism is broken, I would recommend using
Maildir.
i think he meant that mutt itself is mounted on the NFS share. i
wouldn't do this unless i had to, and i can imagine it might cause some
problems, but shouldn't be a big
On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, David T-G wrote:
Can you clarify what sort of funkiness is going on? Is it just 'N'ew
folder flagging? Does it resolve itself within a second or two? Are
your client and server clocks in sync? Have you used ls to check the
atime and mtime of a suspicious folder?
This is really irritating. I am currently in a loop between two
mailboxes. Change to one. Status bar says there is new mail in a
folder. Change to it. No new mail. Status bar says there is new
mail in a folder. Change to that. No new mail. And again and again.
So mutt might not actually
On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, MuttER wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:26:22PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
This is really irritating. I am currently in a loop between two
mailboxes. Change to one. Status bar says there is new mail in a
folder. Change to it. No new mail. Status bar says
On Fri, Feb 1, 2002, Knute wrote:
Don't know about that, but I do have an idea.
Do you know if the box in Portland is using GMT or not?
I don't. What will tell me that? 'date' says PST.
If it is, then you can set yours to GMT as well, then they should be in
sync.
Either that or have
Sorry if I missed this in the documentation, but what has changed with
threading from 1.3.24 to 1.3.27? I am finding now that consecutive
posts from the same thread look like seperate messages in the index,
each with '+-' in the index and identical subjects.
Thanks.
-Ken
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
That description isn't enough for me to have any idea what you're
describing. Could you make a small thread and draw (do set ascii_chars
if you want to be able to just copy and paste the index display into
your email) what it looks like in 1.3.24
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
But I don't know. If what you mean is that the second picture is what
it looks like in 1.3.27, could you please send me a small test mailbox
demonstrating this?
I will when I see it again. Very odd behavior.
-Ken
I have one mailbox that has A LOT of messages in it, as in quite a few
thousand. It is in mbox format. For mutt to open it as quickly as
possible, it is dependent on processor speed? I moved my mail to a
friend's server which has some really old hardware, and it takes a
long time to open this
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002, Benjamin Smith wrote:
CPU does become important if you're using threading as mutt needs to
trawl through the mailbox trying to match up threads. This is further
slowed is $strict_threads are unset as it needs to play with
$reply_regexp on every message.
In my case it
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
I moved my mail to a friend's server which has some really old
hardware, and it takes a long time to open this mailbox, plus
a few times it has simply stopped while opening it and
I had to kill off the mutt process and open it again.
check the
Until I can get another shell account up and running, I am trying mutt
on my Mac OS X machine to get my mail via POP. I tried it and was
hoping the incoming mail would go through procmail, but it all came into
the spool folder. Unless it should, and something here is
misconfigured, is there
There is some company who makes an Exchange client, for I think at
least Linux and Solaris. I forget who it is, but it's supposed to be
rather good.
-Ken
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Samuel Padgett wrote:
I sometimes ssh into my machine from work and use Mutt. The
connection through the firewall, however, is, uh, a bit tenuous
and often gets dropped. Sometimes this happens when I am
composing a message. Is there a good way to recover these
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Samuel Padgett wrote:
vim -r will give you a list of recoverable temp files. Rarely fails
me.
Yes, but then how do I actually send the message. Cut-n-paste
into a new composition buffer?
I was hoping Mutt had some facility to notice /tmp/mutt-* files
that are
Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the
status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around
that?
Thanks.
-Ken
On Sun, Jan 6, 2002, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
Previously, Ken Weingold wrote:
% Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the
% status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around
% that?
Well, it sort of is technically new as you haven't read it yet
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the
current entry
Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
that isn't new? ;)
No, clear-flagN just seems to clear the 'N' flag if it exists. If
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve
at the beginning then turn it back on before doing the actual deletion.
True. How do I do this, then? I have tried to few things, but
nothing seems to work correctly.
Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001, Thomas Roessler wrote:
a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you,
mutt wouldn't be the program it is.
And thanks to you, Thomas, for keeping all of us sane, though email
anyway
-Ken
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a new mutt user from Outlook land. I've been using Outlook for the
past four years. I'm doing some linux driver work now, and I'm sick of
worrying about and dealing with potential Outlook related viruses (and I
hate using the mouse for
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001, John P . Verel wrote:
Does the abort_nosubject option work in 1.2.5? My .muttrc entry is:
set abort_nosubject=ask-no
Based on the manual, I'd have thought that when I press y to send a
message with no subject, I would not be prompted to abort or send. Yet,
I'm
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001, Jim Mock wrote:
There was a patch for this sent to mutt-dev a few days ago. For those
of you using the FreeBSD mutt-devel port, I committed the patch the
other night. For those of you that aren't using FreeBSD or the port,
the patch is attached.
Jim, thanks a lot for
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001, Brian Clark wrote:
* tim lupfer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 12. 2001 10:45]:
hey, did anyone ever happen to come up with an answer for the \012
1.3.24 weirdness? I finally decided to upgrade some of my machines,
and little things like random \012's on my screen bother
The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in
long threads, where some messages have been deleted, so I know which
messages are on equal levels and such. But, I wonder if this could be
done, which might have the same effect, but make the threads narrower.
Instead of
On Sun, Dec 9, 2001, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
Okay, I read this and am still confused about something. I understand
about the '?' and '*', but why the multiple '?'s?
A series of referenced messages that don't exist.
Oh, the References: header. Gotcha. :)
Looking forward to the new patch
I think it would be really cool in the manual to see at what version
of mutt each config variable came in.
-Ken
On Wed, Dec 5, 2001, Samuel Padgett wrote:
Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or you could just remap 'q' to Quit. Or use 'Q'.
Key is not bound. Press '?' for help.
Hm.
Weird. I never touched those in my muttrc, so they are default for
me.
Qquit save
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001, Sean LeBlanc wrote:
Is there a way to delete an attachment that one accidentally added?
I noticed this when I was attaching some files for a message. I
accidentally selected one, but couldn't figure out how to remove it.
I ended up cancelling the message, and then
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001, Sean LeBlanc wrote:
Right now, if I get into an action that needs some input at the
bottom, and I didn't intend this action in the first place, I'm just
hitting Ctrl-C and then selecting n (to not exit mutt). Is this
standard procedure, or is there a better way to do
I know this was discussed before, and setting my term to rxvt fixed
it. The highlighting of syntax in the mutt pager or vim or whatever,
where it will either highlight only until the end of the text on each
line, or all the way to the end of the terminal. Whatever I try, in
Mac OS X's terminal,
Here's another. All the other PGP-signed emails in the thead parsed
fine. Just this one was like this, every time.
--
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 11:18:42 2001
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter
Does anyone here use this? I'm playing with it at work and have some
issues. I don't want to waste the time of the list for this, so if
you could reply off-list, that would be great.
Thanks.
-Ken
This is why I thought it odd that Suresh's PGP-signed email wouldn't
show up. His is the only one like that for me. This is Ricardo's email from
just today, how all of them come out:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Oct 25 21:01:42 2001) --]
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The
Why is it that in the mutt pager, all I saw from Suresh's email was:
[-- Error: unable to create PGP subprocess! --]
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
I can see the text from the attachment menu and in my editor in a
reply, but not in the pager.
Thanks.
-Ken
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001, David T-G wrote:
...and then Ken Weingold said...
% Why is it that in the mutt pager, all I saw from Suresh's email was:
%
% [-- Error: unable to create PGP subprocess! --]
% -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Probably because mutt couldn't create a PGP subprocess
All of a sudden, with no changes to mutt, one mailbox (by far the
largest, if is makes a difference), is acting weird as far as new mail
notification. It will notify me in the status bar that there is new
mail, and I see that mailbox at the bottom of mutt, but after a few
seconds, the 'Inc' in
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001, Lance Simmons wrote:
Is it possible to mark a read message in a mailbox as unread, thereby
keeping it from automatically being moved to another mailbox (since I've
got a folder-hook setting move to yes)? Seems like an obvious thing
to want to be able to do, but I can't
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001, David wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 03:04:08PM +0200, Ren? Clerc wrote:
* Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-10-2001 14:48]:
| Hello,
| I use threads
| I would like the messages within the threads sorted
| by received date, the newest coming first.
set
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001, Ailbhe Leamy wrote:
My thoughts are firmly with anyone bereaved by this disaster.
Thanks. I live in NYC and it has been fucked up to say the least.
Thank goodness that though I work in Manhattan, I stayed home sick
today, in Brooklyn. These are some video and still I got
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001, Thomas Roessler wrote:
PS: I forgot something from the NEWS file - you can now pass
full-featured mailto URLs to mutt on the command line, including any
subject, body specifications.
Is this supposed to work like Mike Schiraldi's patch, by default? It
doesn't seem to
On Sun, Sep 9, 2001, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
mmm
Well I looked and looked but I see only a message to
copy a mail message to another folder, not one to move it
(i.e. copy then delete it from source folder).
Am I going blind ?
Save message will copy and mark for deletion. I think it is
On Thu, Sep 6, 2001, Will Yardley wrote:
so this is a bit off topic, but does anyone have a simple set of vim
macros to interface with ispell (or an easy way to spellcheck a file
after editing without leaving mutt)? i'm usually a decent speller but
it is annoying not to be able to check a
On Thu, Sep 6, 2001, Dave Spracklen wrote:
I understand how to use the color settings in the configuration file. My
problem is that although I use color_xterm which is fully color compatible
(including using color0 etc) I can't figure out how I convince mutt to use
color. At first I thought
I changed the color for the 'messages' object from the default, and am
curious why only some stuff there is colored. Stuff like new mail
notifications and such are, but stuff like you are at the first
message, no. And when it's changing mailboxes and synching, it is not
colored. I guess the
Starting today, mutt will show when there is new mail in my spool
folder at the bottom, but will not put it in the status bar in the Inc
part. If I manually change to it, the new mail is there, marked 'N'.
Why would it be doing this?
-Ken
One thing, too. It is possible that the MTA on your server is
ignoring procmail. I had this issue once on a shell account I got.
they use dmail, and it did just this. I don't have root there, and
the admin is impossible to get hold of, so I gave up. Just a thought.
-Ken
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Ken Weingold mutt [19/08/01 05:22 -0400]:
One thing, too. It is possible that the MTA on your server is
ignoring procmail. I had this issue once on a shell account I got.
they use dmail, and it did just this. I don't have root
I built mutt with ncurses 5.0, and just updated ncurses to 5.2. Any
reason to recompile mutt?
Thanks.
-Ken
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Ken Weingold mutt [18/08/01 03:06 -0400]:
I built mutt with ncurses 5.0, and just updated ncurses to 5.2. Any
reason to recompile mutt?
Reason? See if something breaks - if so recompile (nothing should, ideally)
Because of http
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001, Mark Hill wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 07:26:11AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Mark Hill mutt [19/08/01 01:59 +0100]:
#mailboxes
mailboxes !
mailboxes =blackbox
Try
mailboxes `echo $HOME/Mail/*`
-suresh
Okay, I'm not too sure if
What is the difference between the colors' 'bright' attribute and
mono's 'bold'? The Mutt manual says that 'bright' makes the color
boldfaced, but it is definitely different than mono's bold, where bold
makes the characters a but thicker, where 'bright' simply seems to
make them brighter.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2001, David T-G wrote:
I suppose a procmail rule to delete any mail from those users is out of
the question, right? :-) If I get annoyed I just 'e'dit the message,
'J'oin up the line(s) in vim, save it, and then read it again, but
the same thing (probably dropping even more
Now sure if I should be worried about it, but I get this on the last
line from running make on 1.3.20i:
muttlib.c:73: warning: mktemp() possibly used unsafely; consider using mkstemp()
Anything I should be worried about? Sorry if this is a common
question.
-Ken
Does anyone know of any sites with tutorials on the basics of writing
patches? I would like to modify an older patch, but need some
basic direction on what I am looking at.
Thanks.
-Ken
I would like to try Cedric's patch, so I need to go from 1.2.5i to
1.3.20. No problem, but some of the patches that I normally use now
don't work. I am not terribly familiar with writing patches, so I
wonder if anyone here has converted any of the following for themseves
for 1.3:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2001, David T-G aptly wrote:
I guess us mutt folks are just elitist bastards :-)
Yes, and for better or for worse, damn proud of it. :) At least there
are a FEW people who still appreciate proper formatting. :-/
-Ken
On Thu, Aug 2, 2001, David T-G wrote:
% list users don't seem to know much about E-Mail: They just hit Outlurks
% Reply-button, erase the subject and start another thread. The result
Don't you just *hate* that? Urgh!
I see it all the time and it iritates the hell out of me.
% Can I do
Sorry if I am missing something basic here, but since I have been
playing with colors, something is different and I am not sure how. In
monochrome, I made the status bar bold. In color, it is brightcyan.
Yes, it's bright, but bold changes the text a bit in a way I really
liked, making the '-'s
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Are you using the internal pager, vim, or something else?
The internal pager is pretty clearly described in the mutt manual -
directives specified in section 6.3 IIRC, search for color. It really
is quite simple.
If you are using vim, I can
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
You probably want to look in your .muttrc for the 'pager' directive.
If you don't have it set, then you are using the internal one.
I don't have a problem, I was just showing how that example looked in
color. :)
-Ken
So sorry if this has been covered, but with mail coming from more
plebian :) mailers, I find that quoted text will wrap, so the end of
a quoted line does not have the '' in the beginning. This of course
messes up the coloring, so the little pieces of the previous quoted
line is a different
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001, Michael Elkins wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 10:33:28AM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
At the top of my Mutt there are the standard indications, such as Msgs,
Del, New, Old, and Inc... what does Inc stand for? I know it's the
number of folders with new messages, but
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001, John Arundel wrote:
On 2001-07-17 at 11:06:14, Chris Fuchs warbled:
As a professional courtesy to some of the people I work and
deal with.
Ah - yes, I realise that you will receive top-posted mail, and that you
don't have time to educate everyone you deal with, but
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly - and that's (one of) the reasons, why TOFU (german, meaning: text
above, full quote below) is *BAD*. It wastes bandwith and makes it harder to
follow to what *EXACTLY* you're relying. It's simply neither necessary nor
wanted nor is
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach »John Arundel« am 2001-07-11 um 15:55:48 +0100 :
Remember that in most cases people reading your followup will have just
read the preceding message. They don't need to see it again.
Exactly.
Usually yes, but there really are cases
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001, Dan Boger wrote:
Just a wild guess that the vi gurus here could help me out... When I
reply to a message, I try to quote only the relevant parts. But once
I'm done, especially if the message is part of a long and over quoted
thread, I have to delete 10s, or even 100s
FYI: CDE's Terminal does color. As soon as my DSL is connected at
home I will be installing stuff such as GNOME, but until then Terminal
works fine. Of course I need to know how to make the cursor not blink
by default... :)
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001, Greg Matheson wrote:
Yes, I only tried it on mbox folders. I wonder if a patch to readmsg
for maildir folders was what Sven Guckes was talking about?!
Try the newsgroups. Sven tends to hang out there more than the list.
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM:
On Mon, May 28, 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
john gennard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, when after reading the mail I type 'd' for deletion,
the folders I'm in is deleted.
I don't use mbox files much; I don't know if mutt is supposed to leave a
0-byte file there when you delete
On Mon, May 7, 2001, Danny O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:53:47PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote:
If I'm in the middle of composing a new msg then I remember something, a
paragraph or a few lines perhaps, in another msg that I want to include,
I postpone my msg editing, then
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001, Brian Nelson wrote:
This is something that's confused me for a while. Is mutt supposed to
automatically open all mailboxes that have new mail in them if you
keep pressing the tab key?
This doesn't happen for me. Tab will cycle through all the new email
in the
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001, Brian Nelson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 02:28:22PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote:
space cycles through the mailboxes with new mail.
It does? From what view? For me, space in the index view opens the
selected message (ie. bound to display-message). What command
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001, Jeroen Valcke wrote:
Been using mutt for a while now but still haven't figured this out.
How can I scroll in a message? I know I can scroll down one page at a time
by pressing space and back up with _
But how can I scroll line by line, I just can't find this simple
Is it only Jeremy who maintains the mutt site? The URL to a patch I have linked
from there is dead, and I send him the updated one but haven't heard
from him.
Thanks.
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001, Wade A. Mosely wrote:
Robert Barish wrote:
Hello
I am just getting my feet wet with mutt and trying it out to see if it
will be my email client of choice. So far I really like the speed of
mutt. I have a real basic question. How does one incoporate a spell
Sorry that this is a bit off topic, but it sort of relates to mutt.
:-/ I am on a few egroups/yahoogroups lists and after being annoyed
enough with their stupid ads, finally realized that there must be a
way to kill all the ad crap via procmail. Even nicer is Mikka's
adfilter.pl that I find
Woops, sorry. There are examples at the top of the script.
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
On Wed, Mar 7, 2001, Horace G. Friend III wrote:
The windoze world is full of all kinds of viruses. Is it the same in Linux?
I just received an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (probably a fake) with
an attachment (AHAOFIA.EXE) described as application/octet-stream, base64 encoding,
size 30K.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2001, Debbie Tropiano wrote:
How does one do limiting on fields other than the subject field?
In elm I can do "l to mutt" and limit to all messages sent to
the mutt mailing lists. So far I've not found a way to do this
with mutt (OTOH I haven't ready *everything* there is to
On Thu, Mar 1, 2001, John P. Verel wrote:
On 03/01/01, 09:45:10PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
Dirk Laurie muttered:
Is there a mutt function that lest me reply to the "From" address
even when "Reply-To" is provided?
For this purpose set ignore_list_reply_to. Maybe in combination
I am still trying to get this to work and it is not. I also get mail
at different address and would like mutt to change the From: field to
that address the email to which I am replying to was sent. I have
'set reverse_name' and 'set alternatives' with the address set, and it
still puts in the
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001, Jrgen Salk wrote:
If you edit your mails with vim, you can easily reformat the quoted
lines by the "gq{motion}" command. E.g. "gqj" will format the
current line and places the cursor in the next line. Then proceed
with the "." command. Or just type "gqG" which will
I think you have a problem with your headers. Check it out:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 27
10:18:31 2001
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:17:29 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Teodor Cimpoesu teo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
The more I read about MacOS X, the more excited I am getting.
http://salon.com/tech/review/2000/11/17/hubbard_osx/index1.html. It
is looking more and more like a poor-man's SGI workstation. GUI-based
OS with a real UNIX kernel in the background. As much as I like Linux
and such, I lose a lot
In the attachment menu of an email I received, I hit 'd' on an
attached jpeg, then 'q' to get back to the index. The messaged showed
the lowercase 'd' indicating that one part was marked for deletion. I
resync the mailbox and it doesn't delete the attachment. Message
stays the same. The
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm somewhat of a newbie. I'm using Mutt 1.2.5 and vim. I would
like to set a wrap length for my messages at an attractive 60 or so
columns. It seems like the only thing I've read that you can do is
get an external paragraph formatter like
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001, Chip Paswater wrote:
set editor="vi -c 'set tw=60'"
Woops, tw is what I meant. Not wm. Ignore my post. :-/
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
On Wed, Feb 7, 2001, G.Embery wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:14:53AM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
What is it that mutt uses to tell that an email is in HTML? I set
autoview to launch lynx to view HTML, and all of a sudden I am seeing
a lot more emails as html.
If email provides
What is it that mutt uses to tell that an email is in HTML? I set
autoview to launch lynx to view HTML, and all of a sudden I am seeing
a lot more emails as html. I commented out autoview in my muttrc and
looked at one of them again and it was normal, in plain text. Here
are the headers I
101 - 200 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
