Re: set date_format

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 06:47:30PM +, Ебрашка wrote: > Can you tell me how to make the date display in the catalog with letters > in day/month/year format, i.e. 09/05/2024 I write in muttrc set > date_format="%d/%m/%Y" and there are no changes. I think you need to override the default or

Re: How to delete message with purge=no?

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 08:22:03PM +0800, Sadeep Madurange wrote: > When deleting emails (with d), I get a prompt for purging them. I'd like > to silence that prompt with 'no'. And, see the prompt when I change > folder, or better yet, when I quit mutt. > > Is there a way to do this? If I'm

Re: Question about message id

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 01:05:09PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:33:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > > side note: using quotes around the template screws things up, that is, > > set message_id_format="" > > vs > > set message_id

Re: Question about message id

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:33:55AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > > I think some people mentioned some minor threading issues with the new > > format? > > Is that so? I don't recall noticing anything about that... I'd love a > pointer to some details, if anyone has that. It's possible that it was

Re: Question about message id

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:33:55AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:05:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > > > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone) > > > s

Re: Question about message id

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone) > should care in the slightest what your message ID looks like. That's totally true, but I still like the classic Mutt message-id format. Maybe it's just nostalgia,

Re: Question about message id

On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote: > Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have > the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail? > For example Message-Id: <43265...@example.com> consisting of random > digits and domain name There was a long

Re: [OT] Terminal redraw issues / isync launchctl job in macOS 13.5

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 08:52:21AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > On 2023-08-14 14:16, Will Yardley wrote: > > I am observing this as well (at least with 2.2.7) -- both before and > > after recompiling. > > This can be fixed by using a newer ncurses version

Re: compiling issues on latest ventura + latest mutt

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:39:34PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 02:02:52PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > > Building latest mutt (2.2.10) on latest Ventura (13.5) (using homebrew > > for all the deps), and getting errors like this for gpg-error and a

Re: [OT] Terminal redraw issues / isync launchctl job in macOS 13.5

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 03:47:53PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > I recently upgraded to macOS 13.5, and for the first time, there are > redraw issues in the Terminal with mutt (2.2.10, installed via > Homebrew). Also, the launchctl job for isync/mbsync (1.4.4, also > installed via

compiling issues on latest ventura + latest mutt

Building latest mutt (2.2.10) on latest Ventura (13.5) (using homebrew for all the deps), and getting errors like this for gpg-error and a similar one for gpgme itself (side note: the actual problem I'm trying to fix is weird screen redraw artifacts since updating OS X with the version I'd had

Re: INBOX message count in sidebar

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:18:37PM +0200, Mikhail Nidze via Mutt-users wrote: > The problem was in *folder* and *spoolfile* variables incorrectly set. > The correct ones are: > > set folder = "imaps://imap.mail.me.com:993" > set spoolfile = "imaps://my_acco...@imap.mail.me.com/INBOX" BTW,

Re: Is there any way to view text/html inline *only if* we think text/plain is not right?

I usually hit 'v' and then go in and view the other section that way if I don't think the default one (I think plain text for me) looks right. w

Re: restrict folder hook to specific folder(s)

On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:27:05AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > I have a folder called "R". There are other folders that have "R" in > their name. However, when I set up a > > folder-hook '(R)' > > it seems to apply to all folders with R in it, with embarrassing > consequences. How do I make

Re: from and envelope_from_address

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:34:07PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 02:02:54PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > > Won't setting > > set use_from > > globally accomplish always setting the envelope-from address to the > > header from? > > Not i

Re: from and envelope_from_address

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 09:39:20AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 05:14:38PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > lists -group mutt mutt-users > > send-hook '%L mutt' "set from='googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org' ; set > >

Re: test shell env in .muttrc

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 08:26:16PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > Perhaps I've overlooked the facility. Is there a way to test the > shell environment in .muttrc? Basically an "if" statement. > > I enter mutt in several ways (direct, aliases, shell scripts, > functions, etc) and from several

Re: [Mutt] attach file from another email to current email

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:15:48AM +0100, Bastian wrote: > On 15Nov22 23:36-0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > On Tue Nov15'22 12:33:32AM, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: > > > You can select the attachments you want from one source message, then > > > reply > > > (r) or forward (f) and mutt will ask whether

Re: in search of OAuth2 tokens for Microsoft Office 365

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 06:13:42PM -0500, Greg Marks wrote: > Is the least intrusive way to proceed to request that my Azure account > associated with my university e-mail be granted permission in the > Azure Active Directory in the Azure AD role of "Application > developer"? So, I went through

Re: Regard To-Envelope for alternates?

my default From: to my mutt-ML-specific > address. It's not overly taxing, but it's annoying to manually do > what could be done automatically. I agree that would be useful. That said, I usually handle the scenario you describe this way: send-hook '~C ^mutt-users@mutt\.org$' 'my_hdr From: Will Yardley ' w

Re: Regard Envelope-to: for alternates?

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 02:28:43PM +0200, Bastian wrote: > On 12Sep22 14:24+0200, Bastian wrote: > > Would it be feasible to also let the alternates scan the mail headers > > and find the header 'To-Envelope'? > > Sorry, the header is labled Envelope-to: I agree having some kind of ability to

Re: mutt, imaps and OAuth2

On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 12:51:34PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > Hello Francesco! > > Have you considered enabling 2fa and then adding an application-specific > > password? > > I didn't realise this possibility was there, actually, many thanks for > mentionning it! Yeah, if you can use an

Re: [OT] fetchmail replacement supporting Oauth

On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 03:18:20AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > Will Yardley writes: > > > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 02:17:40PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote: > >> > >> Google seems serious about disabling app passwords for good this time > >> in f

Re: [OT] fetchmail replacement supporting Oauth

On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 02:17:40PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote: > > Google seems serious about disabling app passwords for good this time > in favor of Oauth. Any links / docs / background on this? w

Re: vs. / vs.

On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:43:46AM +1100, raf wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 06:23:19PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg > wrote: > > Procmail is badly outdated, > > I might be the only person that thinks this, but... > > If it's still in use and still usable, it's not "outdated". > It's just

Re: Oauth with Microsoft authenticator

On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:55:46AM +, lejeczek via Mutt-users wrote: > > I'm fiddling with mutt first time and I'm trying to hook into Microsoft > which I limited by my org - I cannot generate any app passwords. > I wondered if it would work with/via "authenticator app" where MS generates >

Re: display_filter and multipart mails

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:49:38PM +, mi...@posteo.nl wrote: > I receive mails from someone using Content-Type: multipart/alternative > with two parts. First: text/plain, second: text/html. The first part > is always buggy (missing blanks and incorrect paragraphs). This is why > in this case

Re: Automatic Key Search for email Sender?

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 05:13:45PM -0400, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. wrote: > Is there a way to get mutt to automatically search for a gpg key for an > email sender and put it in my keychain? GPG can be configured to do this _if_ the key is on public keyservers See:

Re: disable gpg in mutt

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 03:06:18PM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: > > how can I completely disable gpg integration in mutt ? > > If message happens to be encrypted, I would like mutt to simply show me > the source (encrypted). [...] > I don't know how that happened. I am using gpg on the same

Re: No Messages in Hotmail Inbox

On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 09:10:25AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > I created my Hotmail account through mutt-wizard. Previously I > > created Gmail and GMX accounts successfully. But this time I find no > > messages in Hotmail Inbox, though I have thousands of emails in > > Hotmail. Here are

Re: Wordwrap of long lines

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:46:58AM -0400, David J. J. Ring, Jr. wrote: > It seems I'm either getting emails with long lines now all of a sudden > or I did something to my configuration. As far as your outgoing messages (at least this one), they're showing up with unwrapped lines, which is an

Re: Thank you for threading!

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:55:46AM -0400, Andrew D. Arenson wrote: > I recently upgraded my work workstation from RHEL6 to Ubuntu 20.04, so > was able to move from mutt 1.5.20 to 1.13.2 ... and now I have > threading! Threading has been part of Mutt since I can remember; maybe your default config

Re: mailing list config - two questions

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:46:04PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > When is it useful to have a mailing list to which > you are not subscribed "known"? IIRC, the original purpose was mostly to setup the (not ever ratified as a real standard, and not commonly used now) mail-followup-to header

Re: Choose 'From:' address based on 'To: address

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 08:55:45AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 25Feb2021 09:56, Will Yardley wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:11:02PM +, Alexander Huemer wrote: > >> Is there a configuration option to choose which 'From:' email address > >> shall be

Re: Choose 'From:' address based on 'To: address

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:11:02PM +, Alexander Huemer wrote: > Is there a configuration option to choose which 'From:' email address > shall be used if a mail to a certain 'To:' address is composed? If a > 'To:' address isn't in the mapping, then the 'set from' configuration > setting

Re: list messages with emojis in subject line? 

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:12:32AM -0800, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: > What filter can I use to only show messages that contain emojis in the > subject line? > > For me, these are almost always spam, so I would like to quickly > filter them out. Seems like that might be challenging - even if Mutt

Re: not to set message id in outgoing email

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 06:33:37PM +0100, Claus Assmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021, Will Yardley wrote: > > > Even if Mutt doesn't set one, the first MTA it hits will add one. Not > Not really - a MTA should not make such changes. > A MSA should do it, but Message-Id: is a

Re: not to set message id in outgoing email

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:57:32AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote: > > When I use mutt to construct an outgoing email, is there a way not to > set the message id? Thanks. Even if Mutt doesn't set one, the first MTA it hits will add one. Not setting one will also break threading. What exactly is your goal

Re: GMail SMTP: no authenticators available?

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:22:04PM -1000, Baron Fujimoto wrote: > > The following in my muttrc was used successfully util this problem began: > > set smtp_url = smtp://u...@example.org@smtp.gmail.com Do you have smtp_authenticators (unset by default) set? set smtp_url =

Re: Option to control top-posting in replies?

On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 08:36:27PM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote: > > I went through all of the config options (I think) and couldn't find > an option for this, so I decided to ask on here. > > I'd like to selectively prevent top-posting in Mutt. Mostly, that > would mean changing the position of

Re: imap_pass == smtp_pass ?

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 09:29:26PM +, markol...@danwin1210.me wrote: > On 201119-07:42-0500, Philippe Meunier wrote: > > > > I use an IMAPS server for reading email and an STMPS server for sending > > email. Both servers use the same password, which I think is a fairly > > common setup. > >

Re: Syntax for creating Muttrc.

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:58:17PM -0700, M.R.P. zensky wrote: > Can someone tell me the syntax for creating a Muttrc file on linux? I > have installed it on linux and am trying to understand how to > configure it. man 5 muttrc and / or looking at the sample one that should ship with Mutt could

Re: IMAP authentication in one domain (my institution) and redirect to Gmail

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:01:43AM -0300, Marcelo Laia wrote: > > There are some way to connect offlineimap and msmtp, and so on mutt, in > this authentication way? If you can create an "app password", it's relatively easy. https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/185833?hl=en If your org

Re: Index screen - could it feature time segments?

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:26:01AM +0300, Leho Kraav wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 05:08:25PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: > > Alternatively, if you are accessing the mailboxes via IMAP, the server > > software may have a fancier mechanism. For example, Dovecot has virtual > > folders. >

Re: support for Office365?

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:20:25PM -0400, Andrew D. Arenson wrote: > My organization is moving to Office365 and have decided, sadly, not to > support IMAP. > > Anyone have insight in how mutt might still be able to connect to > Office365? If app passwords are enabled, you can just do that

Re: mutt for office 365 mfa

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:00:58PM -0400, Dave Botsch wrote: > I haven't looked into it enough to know the difference between xoauth2 and > oauthbearer. > > Here is MS's blog post: >

Re: mutt for office 365 mfa

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 08:32:13PM -0400, Dave Botsch wrote: > that's been pushed off until 2021. Supposedly Office365 now support oauth2 > via imap/smtp/pop. I think only by an older method, though (XOAUTH2 vs. OAUTHBEARER)

Re: mutt for office 365 mfa

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 02:09:17PM -0400, Scott Brozell wrote: > > The organization i work for has forced on us office 365 multi factor > > authentication. In addition to outlook duo they are supporting > > evolution and have setup a

any new progress on OAuth 2 / Office365 access

Anyone have any tricks / tips for accessing Office365 via Mutt? I know there have been a couple threads in the past has anyone gotten any of the existing OAuth auth hooks to play nice with Office365, or written any new tooling around it? w

Re: NNTP ?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 09:49:41PM +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > So, I just started my trip in the Mutt world. So far, I like it. Just > a quickie: does mutt support NNTP as well ? Without a patch, I don't think so. I haven't had a usenet feed for a long time, but a lot of mutt users use

Re: Alternate html and text plain avoinding message like "your mailreader dont support html-mail"

On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 11:18:08AM -0300, Marcelo Laia wrote: > There are some alternative to tell mutt to read first text plain only > if it is the full message? Ignoring text plain messages if it is short > like "your mailreader don't support html message"? I have seen this happen

Re: marking a message as "read"

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 12:38:25PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > On 2019-09-06 10:50, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > Both "new" and "old" are "unread".  "read" means neither new nor old. > > That sounds familiar. I think that goes back about 40 years, long before > Mutt, to how spooling of

Re: mailboxes - example

On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 07:15:49AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 01:07:28PM +, Dan Ciprus (dciprus) wrote: > > Obviously all strings defined there are considered mailboxes even though > > there is no maildir structure nor mailbox file. > > Yes, that's exactly the

Re: NeoMutt 20170113 (1.7.2) (debian9) segfaults on readonly mbox

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 08:24:11AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:47:15PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: > > This might not be the right place to report this but > > Is the mutt mailing list the right place to discuss neomutt problems? > (Serious question, I don't actually

Re: majordomo [Was: Send to a Listing]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 07:52:46AM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: > Derek Martin wrote: > > The whole point of suggesting majordomo is that (IIRC) it keeps the > > recipients in a plain-text file, one address per line, making it > > trivial to replace them by dropping in a file that had them in that

Re: format=flowed

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 08:13:02AM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote: > Only tangentially relevant, I spent a while trying to get > format=flowed to work effectively a year or so ago and couldn't easily > do so (perhaps I was testing against Gmail, I don't recall), and ended > up just converting to

Re: Hide a message?

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:37:28AM -0600, Tim Chase wrote: > On 2018-12-13 22:05, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > mbox still serves my needs and has never failed me. why would I > > want to invest time and effort to change to something (anything) > > else? maildir does not "work better" as I can

Re: [Mutt] Re: Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 06:41:17PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > If you convert the mailing list concept to a group of "To" recipients > instead, the same logic can apply. A sends an email to B,C,D as a group > conversation, "Where should we have lunch today". B may respond to A's > email,

Re: mutt 1.11.1 released

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:37:04PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 04:20:02PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:00:48PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > > > I'm pleased to announce the release of version 1.11.1 (the "A Ch

Re: mutt 1.11.1 released

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:00:48PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 01:22:24PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce the release of version 1.11.1 (the "A Chorus > > Line" release). Instructions for downloading are at > >

Re: mailing list hook

On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:58:31PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-10-07 22:45, Ben Fitzgerald wrote: > > > when I configure a list with "lists", list-reply knows to > > reply to the mailing list. All great. > > In fact the "lists" command is not relevant or necessary for this. List >

Re: support of two factor authentication?

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 02:56:03PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: > However, it should be pointed out that 2FA/MFA is mostly for > websites. The IMAP/POP protocols have no support for it. It's > unlikely that the POP/IMAP protocols will be changed to > incorporate 2FA/MFA. And until that happens, I

Re: support of two factor authentication?

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:49:09AM -0400, José María Mateos wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:26:42PM -0700, Tom Fowle wrote: > > As more isps and email providers require two factor authentication, I > > hope mutt will support this security system! > > Doesn't mutt already "support" this? I

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

I'll be honest, I really don't spend a lot of time thinking about this subject these days. It's rare that I need to spend much time on technical mailing lists and USENET -- so much discussion has moved to online forums, Slack communities, and so forth. With friends, family, and work, I find that

Re: Mail-Followup-To (was Re: breaking long header lines into 2 (or more) lines)

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 08:57:50AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > I always thought $followup_to was a pretty nice feature. While I > sympathize with Matthias, the mischief was the result of > misconfiguration, and Mutt requires nothing if not attention to the > documentation and

Re: Mail-Followup-To (was Re: breaking long header lines into 2 (or more) lines)

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 06:38:54AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, April 25, 2018 a las 08:23:37PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan > escribió: > > > you might want to reconsider. you said *you* didn't make the setting, > > that "mutt" was to blame. there really is no "blame". one

Mail-Followup-To (was Re: breaking long header lines into 2 (or more) lines)

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:28:02AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:56:43PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 17:17:54 CEST, Patrick Shanahan > > > which he did and does regularily: > > > "Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz ,

Re: is it possible to auto-detect mailing list?

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:56:05AM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > > Most mailing lists emails have several sepecial headers, for example, > > "Mailing-List" and "X-Mailing-List". Is it possible to mark those emails as > > subscribed

Re: Mailing list status

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote: > What I use for procmail (if anyone finds it useful): > > :0 > * ^List-Post: .*mutt-users@mutt.org > .mutt-users/ > > :0 > * ^List-Post: .*mutt-us...@osuosl.org > .mutt-users/ Don't forget to escape your literal dots

Re: weird appearance of Chinese email in pager

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:31:21AM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:15:23PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > > Oh - I think I see what you're saying; if it's a single long string, > > like: > > > > 这是一个很长的句子这是一个很长的句子这是一个很长的句子这是一个很长的句子这是一个很长的句子这是一个很长的句子这

Re: weird appearance of Chinese email in pager

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:07:54PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:34:28AM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > > Hi, I am writing to ask if anyone have any solution for properly formating > > mails in Chinese in the pager. I am using the builtin pager but it seems to

Re: weird appearance of Chinese email in pager

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:34:28AM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > Hi, I am writing to ask if anyone have any solution for properly formating > mails in Chinese in the pager. I am using the builtin pager but it seems to > not be able to calculate the width of Chinese characters. It tend to take a >

Re: attachments not shown

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 02:30:16PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 02Feb2018 10:45, Yubin Ruan wrote: > > I got three attachments in a mail, as shown in the attachment view: > > > >[multipart/alternative, 7bit, 97K] > >[text/plain, quoted, utf-8, 9.2K] > >

Re: WIRED: ‘Mailsploit’ Lets Hackers Forge Perfect Email Spoofs (fwd)

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:35:45PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > The attack uncovers bugs in how more than a dozen programs implement > > email's creaky protocol. Read the full story > > With such a tendentious title, I'm not sure I should take anything in > the article seriously. SMTP is a

Re: Mutt - Neomutt and Debian Stretch

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:26:25AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:44:29AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > So please submit your proposal, and I do expect something soon, but > > don't expect my cooperation unless you are willing to ship something > > _much_,

Re: Nested Folders in Mutt?

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:37:40PM -0400, Justin R. Andrusk wrote: > For keeping track of GTD-related tasks, I like to have a top-level > folder called, 'GTD', with sub-folders underneath such as: 'TODO', > 'PENDING', 'DELEGATE', and 'DONE'. > > Is it possible to setup this nested folder

Re: In mutt how do you delete messages marked for deletion?... besides q

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:46:16PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día miércoles, julio 19, 2017 a las 12:00:49p. m. -0700, Timothy Knox > escribió: > > > With $ (reload folder) or c (change folder). > > > > But see this counterpoint: ;-) > > > >

Re: what is the command of group-reply

On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 07:49:49PM +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote: > > Can anyone tell me what is the command of group-reply? > Whenever replying a email with multiple `Cc' and recipents, I usually want to > reply to all of them. This can be achieved by "Reply-to-all" in some mail > clients. In Mutt,

Re: Quitting when messages tagged

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:12:05PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > > > In short: an accidentally-doubled "q" keypress in the message view will > > > quit mutt (I have exit set to the default of "yes"), even if I have a > > > bunch of messages tagged in the folder view. > > > > No there is no such

Re: Tagging duplicates

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:13:00AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > I'm now using mutt on another system and the T~= sequence does not > work and I can't see what I might have added to my .muttrc to make it > work. Do the messages show up as duplicates according to Mutt in the index? Do they have

Re: [OT?] please do not tag messages as spam

Steve says that he's made some adjustments. Let's see if this resolves the subject tagging problem. w

[SPAM?] Re: list-reply without Cc?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:08:30PM +0200, Gabriel Philippe wrote: > I don't know if this is relevant: the list is not a real list with > appropriate headers, and most of the people use poorly-designed MUA > (no Mail-Followup-To, etc.). To be fair, Mail-Followup-To was never turned into a

[SPAM?] Re: mutt 1.7.0 released

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:46:52AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:45:20PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote: > > Many thanks for your effort to keep us flea-free. > > This time I do plan to upgrade. > > My pleasure. :-) > > 1.7.0 had a bit more internal changes than

[SPAM?] updated trash folder patch?

Does anyone have versions of Cedric Duval's trash folder patch (or similar) updated for >= 1.6.1 yet? w

[SPAM?] Re: [SPAM?] Re: no MUTTRC environment variable?

On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 08:13:55PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Will Yardley > <mutt-us...@veggiechinese.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 08:02:38PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > >> I have read the environment variables section in 'ma

[SPAM?] Re: no MUTTRC environment variable?

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 08:02:38PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > > I have read the environment variables section in 'man mutt' and there > does not seem to be a MUTTRC environment variable. One can set using > -F option but sometime environment variable is nice. > > Can someone confirm this is

[SPAM?] Re: BAD signature: mutt, signer, something else?

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote: > mutt/gpg gives me a "BAD signature" for some recent mails on the > openssl users list, one example message is attached. Can someone > else reproduce the problem (the author says it verifies for him)? > If the signature verifies for

Re: Can one do something to an E-Mail without even opening/seeing it in mutt?

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:07:26AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > The muttrc configuration also automatically uses the above > configuration file to set the 'lists', 'subscribe' and 'mailboxes' > entries. It's this that tools like procmail (and sieve?) can't do. One way I've dealt with the

Re: From: oddity

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:36:09PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > I received an email sent to a group of about 10 family and friends. > Their addresses are all in the "To:" list, no "Cc:" list. When I > reply to the message, with either "g" to reply to the group or "r" to > reply to just the

Re: group mailings with blind cc

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 09:30:14AM +1000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:13:47PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:48:26PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > > > On Fri Apr 15 14:40:27 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > > > I'm trying to set up a way to send

Re: How do you survive without notmuch?

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:20:09PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:05:52PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote: > > On 12.04.16 13:05, Derek Martin wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 05:28:08PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote: > > > > The really big benefit of the Unix

Re: How do you survive without notmuch?

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:10:13PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > > well, to answer the OP, I've never before heard of notmuch, so I've > never missed it! At least notmuch w

Re: How do you survive without notmuch?

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:47:03PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > > I am so used to using notmuch integrated into mutt (via mutt-kz), that > I would like to be able to understand how someone does *not* use > notmuch. How do you search for a certain message? Is it simply a > matter of the following? >

Re: How to send a pre-written full email with mutt's built-in smtp

com>: > > > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Will Yardley > > > > <mutt-us...@veggiechinese.net> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 01:19:12AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > > > > > > Suppose that I have a full email (i.e. with head

Re: How to send a pre-written full email with mutt's built-in smtp

On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 01:19:12AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > > Suppose that I have a full email (i.e. with headers and everything). > e.g. I want to keep the message ID the same. How can I used mutt's > build-in smtp to send the email? Basically i want mutt to just send > the email that is already

Re: omit empty mailboxes from list

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:12:34PM +, Christian Ebert wrote: > > May not be exactly what you want, but are you aware of the > next-unread-mailbox command? Hah, does the same thing as the macro I posted that I have been using forever always something new to learn. w

Re: omit empty mailboxes from list

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 02:36:17PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > So my mail reading consists of starting and quitting mutt many times > as I switch among the mailboxes. > > Recently I've been trying to adapt to using the "y" mutt command to > list my mailboxes and select the one I want to read

Re: mutt-1.5.23_9 && gnupg-2.1.6

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:17:25PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:43:16PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:32:34PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:35:35PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > >

Re: hide Bcc und Cc while using AutoEdit

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:12:48PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 29.02.16 08:49, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > * muel...@biologie.uni-osnabrueck.de > > [02-29-16 06:41]: > > > I like to use autoedit but I want to hide the fields Cc: und Bcc: > > > >

imap disconnections with office365

I am using Mutt with Office365, and get a ton of annoying disconnections, either with short periods of idle time, as in the log below, or sometimes even while doing sync operations. The relevant parts of my config are: set folder="imaps://outlook.office365.com" set spoolfile= +INBOX set

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >