Re: [netmod] comments on draft-jouqui-netmod-yang-full-include

Hi Andy, On 3/21/2024 5:35 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: Hi, The presentation yesterday helped me understand the motivation for this work. Seems simple enough, but rife with unintended consequences. RFC 8528 does a good job of dealing with most of these issues, but it is not a design-time

Re: [netmod] New instance serving yangcatalog.org

Hi Robert, Thanks for the proactive note. > All modules (particularly vendor modules) are not yet populated at the new server. We'll address that as soon as we can.     On this one, can you post a note on the web site front page Regards, Benoit On 12/28/2023 3:40 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:

Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

On 9/13/2023 4:36 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Dne 13. 09. 23 v 16:06 Jernej Tuljak napsal(a): On 13/09/2023 14:26, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) wrote: Jernej, Hat off for the tools (and tool vendors!) that assist authors to stay true to YANG RFC sections 10 and 11 also. Well done. :-) I

Re: [netmod] WG adoption call: draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8407bis-02

Dear all, For the same reasons as Adrian, I support adoption. However, I would not rush to publish the new version. We keep learning and we must document this knowledge (see "List name: singular or plural?" which we all thought was documented). Also, we will hopefully soon have a significant

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-08.txt

Dear all, I am generically not in favor of publishing requirement documents. However, it might have proven beneficial in this particular case. Regards, Benoit On 6/26/2023 6:02 PM, tom petch wrote: From: netmod on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: 26 June 2023 16:53 This revision is a

[netmod] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning-03.txt

tconf-yang-notifications-versioning-03.txt Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:26:06 +0100 From: Alex Huang Feng To: Netconf CC: Pierre Francois , Benoit Claise , Thomas Graf Dear Netconf WG, I would like to raise a discussion on how this YANG module should be used and therefore if the cur

Re: [netmod] What to reference when importing an IANA module?

Hi Med, On 1/17/2023 2:46 PM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: If we want to add an IANA link to update RFC 8407, Section 3.9, a couple of remarks: - It's not clear what "a normative reference with the IANA URL" is.     Is it

Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-09

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Regards, Benoit On 1/16/2023 11:59 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: [NOTE: A response is needed from all listed in this message's "To" line, the authors and contributors listed in the draft] Authors, Contributors, WG, In preparation for a

Re: [netmod] What to reference when importing an IANA module?

Dear all, On 1/13/2023 9:22 PM, Randy Presuhn wrote: Hi - On 2023-01-13 10:20 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: On Jan 13, 2023, at 11:25 AM, Benoit Claise wrote: Hi Tom, Yes I do think that people outside the IETF may be ignorant of the nuances of the way the IETF works and  may not realise

Re: [netmod] What to reference when importing an IANA module?

Hi Tom, Yes I do think that people outside the IETF may be ignorant of the nuances of the way the IETF works and may not realise that a URL to the IANA website must be used in preference to an RFC. There is more to YANG modules than extracting the code from somewhere in order to incorporate

Re: [netmod] What to reference when importing an IANA module?

Hi Tom, On 1/12/2023 5:51 PM, tom petch wrote: From: netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise Sent: 12 January 2023 14:45 Dear all, >From the initial problem statement: During a WG adoption poll we have received a comment that the URL should be added in the reference statement when import

Re: [netmod] What to reference when importing an IANA module?

Dear all, From the initial problem statement: During a WG adoption poll we have received a comment that the URL should be added in the reference statement when importing a YANG module maintained by IANA The important question to me is: is this reference text supposed to be read by a

Re: [netmod] WG adoption call: draft-dbb-netmod-acl-03

Support adoption. Regards, Benoit On 12/20/2022 12:00 AM, Lou Berger wrote: Hello, This email begins a 3-week adoption poll for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netmod-acl/ Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time

Re: [netmod] Change in NETMOD Chairs

A big "Thank you" Joel! Regards, Benoit On 10/13/2022 5:30 PM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: I've decided to reduce the number of NETMOD chairs from 3 chairs down to 2. Kent and Lou will continue as NETMOD chairs, Joel is stepping down. For the current amount of work in NETMOD, having two

Re: [netmod] Tree diagram comment lines

Hi Tom, Martin beat me on this one. So the famous +1 to his "in combination with explanatory text to explain certain aspects of the module design "reply :-) We got rid a page number for a good reason (in the YANG world). Regards, Benoit On 4/11/2022 1:02 PM, Martin Björklund wrote: tom

Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-06

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards, Benoit On 4/8/2022 8:09 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: [ Note: existing IPR declaration: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4216 ] Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that

Re: [netmod] iana-if-type.yang has multiple revisions with the same date

+1 to Jürgen point of view. Regards, Benoit From:Jürgen Schönwälder To:William Lupton Cc:NetMod WG Date:2022-03-03 20:01:06 Subject:Re: [netmod] iana-if-type.yang has multiple revisions with the same date The obvious thing to do in this particular case (where there are only allocations of

Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11

+1 B. On 2/14/2022 11:49 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: I have followed the discussions on this draft and believe it is ready for publication. On Thursday, February 3, 2022, 09:54:23 PM EST, Kent Watsen wrote: Dear NETMOD WG, This message begins a two-week WGLC for

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-06

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards, Benoit On 1/31/2022 10:57 PM, Lou Berger wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that

Re: [netmod] too long lines from IANA module inclusion

Dear all, `pyang` and I think `yanglint` also know how to extract folded and elements. Just a correction; pyang doesn't extract anything, but rfcstrip does, and it supports folded artwork, and in the latest greatest 1.3 release it even reconizes the proper RFC8792-defined magic strings ;-) Do

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-08.txt

+1. Regards, Benoit On 11/9/2021 10:17 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: Hi Juergen, My preference would be to last call this document so that other YANG modules can make use of the new types. We can always spin a future bis document if further common types are useful.

Re: [netmod] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-19: (with COMMENT)

Hi Murray, On 10/4/2021 8:25 PM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker wrote: Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-19: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities

Hi Rob, Thanks for your detailed review. A new draft version has been posted. URL:https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities-17.txt Status:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities/

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

Hi Lou, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Regards, Benoit Hi Qin, It's sub-optimal, but sufficient IMO.  Please note you didn't respond for yourself! we're still missing responses from: Qin Wu Benoit Claise Andy Bierman Thanks, Lou On 12/7/2020 8:46 PM, Qin Wu

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06

Hi, "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards, B. Authors, Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption call on the "yang-node-tags” draft. In preparation for that, we’ve determined both that the draft has changed significantly and that there

Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:percentage

On 30/07/2020 15:25, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 02:58:22PM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote: On 20/07/2020 11:19, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: - Percentages are frequently used in YANG models but usages differ a lot in precision

Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:percentage

On 20/07/2020 11:19, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: - Percentages are frequently used in YANG models but usages differ a lot in precision and range. It is not clear what the proper generic definition of a percentage type would be and whether it is worth

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-01

Hi, "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards, B. Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of preparation for WG Adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or

Re: [netmod] CODE BEGINS ENDS for examples ?

Hi Balázs, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8407 3.2.1 . Example Module Example modules are not code components. The convention MUST NOT be used for example modules. Regards, Benoit Hello, Is it allowed/recommended

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06

Juergen, On on side, Balazs mentions: 4+ people asked me explicitly to state this similarity during the development of the draft. The current text is: P2 Instance data shall reuse existing encoding rules for YANG defined data. Its format will be similar to the response of

Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions-03

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions-03#section-3 o Balazs Lengyel o Benoit Claise o Ebben Aries o Jason Sterne o Joe Clarke o Juergen Schoenwaelder o Mahesh Jethanan

Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00

Hi Lou, "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Note: there are more contributors. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00#section-8 o Balazs Lengyel o Benoit Claise o Bo Wu o Ebben Aries o Jason Sterne

Re: [netmod] Adoption of versioning design team docs

Support. Regards, B. As a contributor/DT-member I support the adoption of this set of documents. *From:*netmod *On Behalf Of *Lou Berger *Sent:* Monday, March 2, 2020 5:30 PM *To:* NETMOD Group *Cc:* netmod-cha...@ietf.org *Subject:* [netmod] Adoption of versioning design team docs Hi,

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01

Hi, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Regards, B. Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of preparation for WG Adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or

Re: [netmod] Text in import to indicate whether a module is needed as import-only or as implemented

Hi, On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:23 AM Ladislav Lhotka <mailto:lho...@nic.cz>> wrote: On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 09:52 -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:57 AM Benoit Claise mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>> wrote: > > Sorry to r

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-semver-01

Hi, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Regards, B. Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of preparation for WG Adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or

Re: [netmod] Text in import to indicate whether a module is needed as import-only or as implemented

Sorry to resurrect this old email thread. To me, it's an important piece of information to know that ietf-netconf-acm is optional to implement. It seems that we have 3 potential places where to insert this information 1. The associated document. We could and should insert it into the RFC text.

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang

Jürgen, To tell that I was skeptical about the SUPA work is just wrong. I had great hopes for SUPA, as having consistent policy constructs in YANG module was key. The big hope was that those SUPA constructs could be re-used in other YANG modules     example: routing, ACL, security ...    

Re: [netmod] ID submission YANG validation errors?

Fixed, thanks to Miroslav, in cc. Yangvalidator is working now, and correctly saying that there are no errors. Datatracker is still not using the yangvalidator API to validate modules and therefore it is saying that there are errors. This task is on our todo list. If you find more issues like

Re: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards, B. "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards Balazs *From:* Kent Watsen *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2020 1:46 PM *To:* Balázs Lengyel ; Benoit Claise *Cc:* NETMOD Working Group

Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8199 (5924)

Dear all, This errata should be accepted. Regards, B. The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8199, "YANG Module Classification". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5924

Re: [netmod] IPR poll on yang-versioning-reqs-02

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Benoit To each author and contributor listed on the "To" line. In order to complete the Adoption poll, are you aware of any IPR that applies to yang-versioning-reqs-02?  Please Reply-All to *this* email and state either: "No, I'm not

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

No, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Regards, B. No, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Kent Watsen [mailto:kwat...@juniper.net] 发送时间: 2018年10月17日 5:56 收件人: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Lou Berger'; 'Benoit Claise'; Qin Wu; Adrian Farrel 抄送

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards, B. Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of preparation for WG Adoption Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes,

Re: [netmod] "iana" in yang modules' name/namespace/prefix

Martin, I'm wonder whether this is really an important optimization, worth changing now, in the hypothetical case that IANA is not called IANA any longer in the future? Right now, "iana" n the YANG module name correctly states what this is about

[netmod] Mail regarding draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model

Hi, Note that draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model expired. As a consequence, we're not extracting the YANG module(s) any longer in the IETF and yangcatalog.org toolchain. Regards, Benoit ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org

Re: [netmod] schema mount situation and next steps

Dear all, Some recent news regarding the schema mount. Sometimes, magic happens when people speak to each others face to face. It did happen this week and there is a new schema mount plan that should make everybody a little bit happier. The second NETMOD  session (Wednesday) will exclusively

[netmod] schema mount situation and next steps

Dear all, In the last two weeks, I've been multiplying the schema mount discussions. It's now time to draw the conclusions and to move on. I'm sad that schema-mount is not NMDA compliant. We approved RFC6087bis with the NMDA transition guidelines. I'm sad that progression to IETF-LC has not

[netmod] RFC 8340 to 8346 published

Dear all, RFC8340 | draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06.txt RFC8341 | draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-09.txt RFC8342 |

[netmod] YANG modules publication: what to focus on next? March 14th

018 11:35:45 +0100 From: Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org> Dear all, At the last IETF meeting, Alia, Deborah and I looked at the publication status of most YANG modules. Since that time, I've been keeping a summary of the situat

Re: [netmod] Closing this issue: choice/case in tree diagrams (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06)

Thanks all. This issue is closed and we will apply this change right now, part of the AUTH48 process. Regards, Benoit Dear all, The document draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06 is in AUTH48. It's time to close this issue, let me copy i...@ietf.org. If you object to the change below, let

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Hi, On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:08:32PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: I don't really know what a guideline should say about patterns. I will try to add something that says to document the pattern limitations and keep the pattern as simple as possible, I object to a statement that "pattern should

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

On 3/9/2018 2:27 AM, Adam Roach wrote: On 3/8/18 12:18 PM, Clyde Wildes (cwildes) wrote: Adam, An earlier version of the model (draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08 and prior) included “terminal” as a syslog destination which addresses your requirement below: +--rw terminal

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

On 3/8/2018 3:31 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: On 3/8/2018 3:15 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:21:01PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: I see two solutions from here. 1. we mention "pyang -f yang --yang-canonical --ke

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

On 3/8/2018 3:15 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:21:01PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: I see two solutions from here. 1. we mention "pyang -f yang --yang-canonical --keep-comments FILE" in RFC6087bis, with a warning such as: "As the tool matures, a h

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

On 3/8/2018 2:15 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:41 AM, Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com <mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>> wrote: Eric, Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection Whe

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Hi Adam, Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

Eric, Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [netmod] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alvaro, Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alexey, Warren, Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph,

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Alexey, Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Suresh, On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Suresh Krishnan > wrote: Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to

[netmod] Closing this issue: choice/case in tree diagrams (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06)

Dear all, The document draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06 is in AUTH48. It's time to close this issue, let me copy i...@ietf.org. If you object to the change below, let me know before the end of the week. The changes are to the text, so that the text is adapted to what the tools do. No

Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams

On 3/6/2018 10:44 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi, After thinking some more about this, realizing that this document is in AUTH48, and looking at the first sentence in the Abstract: This document captures the current syntax used in YANG module tree diagrams. I have reached the

[netmod] pyang updated to 1.7.4 and yandump-pro to 17.10.5 and yanglint to 0.14.70

Dear all, The subject says it all. Please check your module validation. A few issues have been solved. For now, check at http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html Allow an big hour for the results to propagate to yangcatalog.org. Regards, Benoit

Re: [netmod] reference statement examples in draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18

Jürgen, It makes sense. This comment should be considered as an IETF LC comment. Regards, B. Hi, I think it was common practice to write reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; instead of just reference "RFC 6991"; that is to include the RFC title (this can be especially

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

On 2/22/2018 11:49 AM, t.petch wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kent Watsen" To: "t.petch" ; "NETMOD Working Group" Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 5:06 PM Kent You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis Part 2

Thank you Andy. Sending to IETF LC now. Regards, Benoit Hi, I think draft-18 addresses all these issues. A guideline about key leaf order has also been added. Andy On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com <mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>> wrote: Dear al

[netmod] YANG modules publication: what to focus on next? Feb 16th

Dear all, At the last IETF meeting, Alia, Deborah and I looked at the publication status of most YANG modules. Since that time, I've been keeping a summary of the situation. Let me share it with everybody. Before publishing YANG modules, we have two series of bottlenecks: - the YANG module

[netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis Part 2

Dear all, Here is the part 2 of the AD review, from section 4.21 on. Regarding the part 1, thanks Andy for addressing all comments in version 17. - section 4.22 "Data Correlation. Not sure what you mean by the section title and "Data can be correlated in various ways"? Which data? YANG

[netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Dear all, - the draft is NMDA compliant, right? It should be mentioned. Ex: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03, in the abstract and intro The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture defined in I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores. - As mentioned

Re: [netmod] Missing references

Hi Henrik, It makes sense. Thanks. Regards, B. Hi Benoit, On 2018-02-07 12:56, Benoit Claise wrote: Hi Henrik, Could this check be added to idnits? Yes. I thought I had something like this already, but it was specifically to look out for mentions of RFC2119. As you may know, I'm due

Re: [netmod] Missing references

Hi Henrik, Could this check be added to idnits? Regards, Benoit I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in a description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the I-D. This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors make; can the

Re: [netmod] YANG tree diagram uses

Martin, Michal, Do we need any clarification in the draft? Regards, B. Michal Vaško wrote: Hi, we have encountered some problem while implementing a feature from draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-05, specifically not resolving groupings and printing uses names instead

Re: [netmod] [Fwd: Protocol Action: 'A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-11.txt)]

eling Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Benoit Claise. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis/ Technical Summary This document contains a specification of three YANG modules and one submodule. Togeth

[netmod] YANG modules publication: what to focus on next? Jan 26th

Dear all, At the last IETF meeting, Alia, Deborah and I looked at the publication status of most YANG modules. Since that time, I've been keeping a summary of the situation. Let me share it with everybody. Here is an update after yesterday telechat: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-10

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16 Part 1

ssarily busy Again, people want easy guidelines/template. Regards, Benoit Kent // contributor On 1/25/18, 6:20 AM, "netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise" <netmod-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of bcla...@cisco.com <mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>> w

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16 Part 1

On 1/25/2018 12:59 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:20:11PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: PROPOSAL (replacing the previous paragraph) If YANG tree diagrams are used, then a normative reference to the YANG tree diagrams specification MUST be provided

[netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16 Part 1

Dear all, Thank you for this important document. I've been spending quite some time trying to relay feedback seen on multiple fronts. This is part 1 of the review, till section 4.21 - This document defines a set of usage guidelines for Standards Track documents containing [RFC7950

[netmod] Validators updated in the toolchain

Dear all, yanglint upgraded to 0.14.65 from 0.13.79 yangdump-pro upgraded to 17.10-4 from 17.10-3 pyang upgraded to the latest github version (still version 1.7.3), but compliant to draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-05

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-entity-06

2. Otherwise (i.e., there is no matching configuration entry), the list entry in the operational state is initialized with values for all nodes as detected by the implementation. If the /hardware/component list in the intended configuratio

Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5237)

Thanks. It's now verified. Regards, Benoit. Hi, This errata should be applied. It is an obvious typo. /martin RFC Errata System wrote: The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".

Re: [netmod] WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Hi Tom, Hi Tom, On 17/01/2018 09:52, t.petch wrote: - Original Message - From: "Alexander Clemm" Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 2:20 AM +1 to (2) as preference, followed by (1).  I don't think (3) is needed here.  The purpose is to make this

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15.txt

On 1/17/2018 9:59 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi, These errors seem to be issues with the tool, not the draft. Good to know Martin. Thanks. Regards, Benoit /martin Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: Hi Mahesh, There is an error with the yangdump-pro: Error: Feature

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-15.txt

Hi Mahesh, There is an error with the yangdump-pro: Error: Feature 'match-on-eth and match-on-ipv4' not found for if-feature statement ietf-access-control-l...@2018-01-16.yang:242.16: error(250): definition not found Error: Feature 'match-on-eth and match-on-ipv6' not found for

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-19.txt

Hi, ** Downref: Normative reference to an Historic RFC: RFC 6587 Kent: hmmm, what's going on here? This YANG module is providing an ability to configure the "tcp" transport, even though the IESG made that ability historic in 2012 (see IESG Note below). Searching online, it looks like

[netmod] YANG modules publication: what to focus on next?

Dear all, At the last IETF meeting, Alia, Deborah and I looked at the publication status of most YANG modules. Since that time, I've been keeping a summary of the situation. Let me share it with everybody. Before publishing YANG modules, we have two series of bottlenecks: - the YANG module

Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

On 1/15/2018 4:48 PM, Robert Wilton wrote: OLD:     If the node is augmented into the tree from another module,     its name is printed as :. NEW:     If the node is augmented into the tree from another module,     its name is printed as :, where is the     prefix defined

Re: [netmod] WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Hi Tom, IMO, the best to proceed is exactly like done in the RIP draft. Some sections 2.* explains how the module was build, based one excerpts of the tree diagram. Then we have the full tree if someone wants to see the big structure. In the end, the tree view should be browsed with tooling.

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-entity-06

nded configuration is modified, then the system MUST behave as if it re-initializes itself, and follow the procedure in (1)."; /martin Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: On 12/20/2017 4:00 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Benoit Claise <bcla...

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-entity-06

ware/component list in the intended configuration is modified, then the system MUST behave as if it re-initializes itself, and follow the procedure in (1)."; /martin Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: On 12/20/2017 4:00 PM, Martin

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-entity-07: (with COMMENT)

On 1/11/2018 10:12 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:49:24AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Will do. As it happens, I always just look into the MIBs distributed by libsmi, and it seems the MIB is not updated there ;-) OK. My fault. Which leads to an interesting

Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: (with DISCUSS)

On 1/9/2018 8:27 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: -- DISCUSS: -- Hello, I'm a little confused on

Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt

7:25 +, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: Hi Benoit, On 12/27/17, 6:18 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: Thanks Acee, Minor question for the working group and the draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip authors. The appendix is about adding a new control-plane protocol. It

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt

Hi, While the abstract mentions: "This document obsoletes RFC 8022 .", you forgot the obsolete tag in the header. Regards, Benoit. A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network

[netmod] Fwd: New datatracker release: v6.68.1

Dear all, I want to draw your attention to this entry below: * Added a data migration to create yang catalog links for yang documents published before the yang catalog link feature was introduced in the datatracker. Ex: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7223/ Happy New Year to all

Re: [netmod] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06.txt

Thanks Acee, Minor question for the working group and the draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip authors. The appendix is about adding a new control-plane protocol. It takes as an example RIP. However, draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip is being finalized (on the IESG telechat on Jan 11th). Does it make sense to

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09.txt

Dear all, We all know it's important to deliver NMDA soon. I'm sending this document to IETF LC now, till Jan 10th. If Vladimir's concern needs to be discussed further, let's do so part the IETF LC. Regards, Benoit Just an FYI - I requested that the authors republish so that all could see

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-entity-06

On 12/21/2017 1:03 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:58:26PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:37:46PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi, I need WG input on this issue. The

Re: [netmod] YANG module security considerations

Dear all, The proposed change has been applied to https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines For all document authors, please apply the new template. Diff at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines?action=diff=13_version=12 Regards, Benoit Hi Lada,

  1   2   3   >