and thus bypass the problem, by
next week I'll probably have to compile one of the larger projects and
I *really* do not fancy going through every reference there to change
them to non-prefixed...
My minimal example worked on the Online ConTeXt in the Garden (pdftex
and xetex), but when I'm running
to display the font with any single font editor, including
FontForge and XeTeX (maybe XeTeX would work if somebody would port it
to 64-bit and corresponding new Apple libraries).
As far as LuaTeX support is concerned, here was the latest answer:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 20:20, Hartmut Henkel wrote
know dvi, but I do not think it is worth mentioning.)
MkII with pdfTeX as engine supports PDF, PS and DVI as output formats but with
XeTeX you have only PDF as output.
With MkIV you can produce PDF and also XML (and afterwards epub) besides the
PDF.
As your client doesn’t know anything about
. Are there others? (I know dvi, but I do not think it is worth
mentioning.)
MkII with pdfTeX as engine supports PDF, PS and DVI as output formats but
with XeTeX you have only PDF as output.
With MkIV you can produce PDF and also XML (and afterwards epub) besides
the PDF.
As your client doesn’t know
and that in the near future
epub will be available. Are there others? (I know dvi, but I do not
think it is worth mentioning.)
MkII with pdfTeX as engine supports PDF, PS and DVI as output
formats but with XeTeX you have only PDF as output.
With MkIV you can produce PDF and also XML (and afterwards
idea of
its usefulness and usage in ConTeXt. (The dvips program will probably
also be removed; I suspect that it doesn't work at the moment anyway.)
xetex ?
(I'm not sure , of course)
--
luigi
___
If your question
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:34, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I'm trying to remember why we are shipping dvipdfmx in ConTeXt: was it
xetex ?
No, many confuse those, but XeTeX is using xdvipdfmx which is largely
based on dvipdfmx
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:34, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I'm trying to remember why we are shipping dvipdfmx in ConTeXt: was it
xetex ?
No, many confuse
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 04:10, Kip Warner wrote:
The problem is it looks like XeTeX may not fully support
some of the features I need like mathematical characters and such yet.
What mathematical characters do you miss?
Mojca
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 09:35 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 04:10, Kip Warner wrote:
The problem is it looks like XeTeX may not fully support
some of the features I need like mathematical characters and such yet.
What mathematical characters do you miss?
Mojca
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:39, Kip Warner wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 09:35 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 04:10, Kip Warner wrote:
The problem is it looks like XeTeX may not fully support
some of the features I need like mathematical characters and such yet.
What
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 02:22, Kip Warner wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 07:58 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Or produce the whole document with ConTeXt + XeTeX :)
I would, but getting ConTeXt alone up and running has taken weeks.
If you have it up and running, you can use it now also for XeTeX
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 08:44 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 02:22, Kip Warner wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 07:58 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Or produce the whole document with ConTeXt + XeTeX :)
I would, but getting ConTeXt alone up and running has taken weeks
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 07:58 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Or produce the whole document with ConTeXt + XeTeX :)
I would, but getting ConTeXt alone up and running has taken weeks.
I don't know to what extent the support is missing (how complex are
the typographical rules apart from just
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Kip Warner wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 06:36 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
ConTeXt MkIV (assuming it is what you use) has no proper support for
Devanagari or other Indic scripts. Since you need only few words, you
can produce them externally (say ConTeXt MkII with XeTeX
{\dontleavehmode\externalfigure[#1][location=lohi]}
\startmkiipreamble
\enableregime[utf-8]
% I don't know how to setup typescripts with xetex
% The rending is wrong. I think that one needs to enable
% some language specific ligatures
\font\devnagari=Lohit-Hindi at 12pt
\starttext
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 06:36 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
ConTeXt MkIV (assuming it is what you use) has no proper support for
Devanagari or other Indic scripts. Since you need only few words, you
can produce them externally (say ConTeXt MkII with XeTeX or Inkscape)
and include the resultant PDF
such a thing, with, say
तरीकिन?
ConTeXt MkIV (assuming it is what you use) has no proper support for
Devanagari or other Indic scripts. Since you need only few words, you
can produce them externally (say ConTeXt MkII with XeTeX or Inkscape)
and include the resultant PDF as inline figure.
Regards,
Khaled
. Since you need only few words, you
can produce them externally (say ConTeXt MkII with XeTeX or Inkscape)
and include the resultant PDF as inline figure.
Or produce the whole document with ConTeXt + XeTeX :)
I don't know to what extent the support is missing (how complex are
the typographical
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 00:38, Daniel Schopper wrote:
Hi Mojca,
indicated by the anchor… so I guess that has to be some issue with the font…
You can try if XeTeX positions the accent properly if you want to test
the font (XeTeX is at least a bit more reliable to do it properly and
it has
I guess that has to be some issue with the font…
You can try if XeTeX positions the accent properly if you want to test
the font (XeTeX is at least a bit more reliable to do it properly and
it has the feature enabled by default).
\font\a=YourFont.otf
\a your-sequence-with-combining-characters
.
A discussion on the xetex mailing list suggests
http://www.tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2006-February/003095.html 0x2423, but
that looks very different from \tt\char 32.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others
this? Is there a unicode character for visible space. A
discussion on the xetex mailing list suggests
http://www.tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2006-February/003095.html 0x2423, but that
looks very different from \tt\char 32.
Actually, the relavant code is in enco-ini.mkiv. So the fix is to set
\def\controlspace
to fix this? Is there a unicode character for visible
space. A discussion on the xetex mailing list suggests
http://www.tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2006-February/003095.html 0x2423,
but that looks very different from \tt\char 32.
The Unicode annotation of that character says graphic for space, so I
of the log are:
TeXExec | using tex engine xetex
TeXExec | using tex format path ./xetex
TeXExec | unable to make format due to lack of permissions
TeXExec | using mp engine mpost
TeXExec | using mps format path .
TeXExec | generating mps format metafun
This is MetaPost, version 1.504 (kpathsea
, because the file 'metafun' could not be
opened.
Where did you install the minimals?
Can you try
chown -R yourusername /path/to/installation
?
The last lines of the log are:
TeXExec | using tex engine xetex
TeXExec | using tex format path ./xetex
TeXExec | unable to make format due to lack
Hello,
In the preparation for TL 2011 Richard Koch asked about the following:
We install some documentation about
ConTeXt, LuaTeX, and XeTeX in /Applications/TeX, mainly
for people who only know LaTeX but would like to get a feel
for later developments. That documentation needs to be up
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
In the preparation for TL 2011 Richard Koch asked about the following:
We install some documentation about
ConTeXt, LuaTeX, and XeTeX in /Applications/TeX, mainly
for people who only know LaTeX
:26
\useattachment[busted][hi.txt]
\starttext
attachment here: \attachment[busted]
\stoptext
Prepending
\setupinteraction[state=start]
to the document, and the compiling with, say, xetex, results in a PDF
that has
\useattachment[busted][hi.txt]
\starttext
attachment here: \attachment[busted]
\stoptext
Prepending
\setupinteraction[state=start]
to the document, and the compiling with, say, xetex, results in a PDF
that has the attachment
\useattachment[busted][hi.txt]
\starttext
attachment here: \attachment[busted]
\stoptext
Prepending
\setupinteraction[state=start]
to the document, and the compiling with, say, xetex, results in a PDF
that has the attachment. But not with mkiv.
--
Jesse
On 6-5-2011 10:00, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
We were originally preparing the example for XeTeX (which behaves very
weird anyway) and I would like to know how to typeset Ethiopic text in
ConTeXt.
Let's forget about xetex then. It's not that complex to add to mkiv as
we have mechanisms in place
Dear Hans,
We were originally preparing the example for XeTeX (which behaves very
weird anyway) and I would like to know how to typeset Ethiopic text in
ConTeXt.
The basic requirements are:
- Words may be split after any character (character = syllable; it's
in the range 1200-139F
) that I wanted to test
out. I used Texworks and ran ContXt(MKII) from the menu. Below is my result.
=
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9997.4 (Web2C 2010) (format=cont-en
2011.5.2) 2 MAY 2011 12:11
entering
your problem:
- fmtutil-sys --byfmt cont-en
- fmtutil --byfmt cont-en
- texexec --xtx --make
If none of them does, you first need to find a file
web2/xetex/cont-en.fmt sowhere on your disk, delete it and try out
fmtutil again (or texexec --xtx --make).
However neither TeX Live nor minimals contain
Hi Majorca
Thanks for your hints. I actually used the tlmgr to add the modules from
tlcontrib.metatex.org/2010 which includes taspresent. I did try the commands
you gave and none of them seem to work on my system. I may need to locate the
web2/xetex/cont-en.fmt as you suggested.
Isaac
. I may need to
locate the web2/xetex/cont-en.fmt as you suggested.
Hi Ismael,
for starters, call texexec from the command line, not from
within an editor, this will give you more info and will
make it easier to help. Giving us the output of
which texexec
and
kpsewhere -engine=/ cont
contextgarden.net::'minimals/current/base/tex/ minimals/current/base/metapost/
minimals/current/fonts/common/ minimals/current/fonts/other/
minimals/current/misc/web2c minimals/current/base/xetex/
minimals/current/fonts/new/ minimals/current/fonts/new/
minimals/current/fonts/old/' '/opt/context
, except old stand-alone installation. It's
cause of frustration and after several attempts they give up. Then they
return to LaTeX (like me too).
Well, with TeX Live 2010 it's very simple to use MkII with both pdfTeX and
XeTeX. Hopefully, some future version of TeX Live (2011?) will offer
error message:
\count0=0
\loop\ifnum\count05000
\advance\count0 by 1
\shipout\vbox{}
\repeat
\end
\starttext
\dorecurse{1} {test: \recurselevel\page}
\stoptext
pdftex + mkii : 35 sec
xetex + mkii : 35 sec
luatex + mkiv : 40 sec
no crashes.
No sense when you say no crashes without
On 18-3-2011 3:54, mathew wrote:
On Mar 14, 2011, at 16:49, Marco wrote:
I totally agree. But Cecil mentioned in another thread: »My document is mostly
text.« Even if a few mp graphics are involved luatex is still noticeably
slower.
I look at it from the perspective that the last time I used
\ifnum\count05000
\advance\count0 by 1
\shipout\vbox{}
\repeat
\end
\starttext
\dorecurse{1} {test: \recurselevel\page}
\stoptext
pdftex + mkii : 35 sec
xetex + mkii : 35 sec
luatex + mkiv : 40 sec
no crashes.
No sense when you say no crashes without show us the version of your
Windows.
To be honest, I did have problems getting LuaTeX and XeTeX to
recognize the PostScript fonts installed with GhostScript, so I
eventually removed them from my font path. My general conclusion is
that life is a lot, lot simpler if you throw away all your Type 1
fonts and replace them
of TeX under
Windows.
To be honest, I did have problems getting LuaTeX and XeTeX to
recognize the PostScript fonts installed with GhostScript, so I
eventually removed them from my font path. My general conclusion is
that life is a lot, lot simpler if you throw away all your Type 1
fonts and replace
On Mar 14, 2011, at 16:49, Marco wrote:
I totally agree. But Cecil mentioned in another thread: »My document is mostly
text.« Even if a few mp graphics are involved luatex is still noticeably
slower.
I look at it from the perspective that the last time I used TeX, my 8MHz Atari
ST took
. It's
cause of frustration and after several attempts they give up. Then they
return to LaTeX (like me too).
Well, with TeX Live 2010 it's very simple to use MkII with both pdfTeX and
XeTeX. Hopefully, some future version of TeX Live (2011?) will offer the
same for MkIV. Script is already
\end
\starttext
\dorecurse{1} {test: \recurselevel\page}
\stoptext
pdftex + mkii : 35 sec
xetex + mkii : 35 sec
luatex + mkiv : 40 sec
no crashes.
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand that
you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used?
--
Cecil Westerhof
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand that
you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used?
MKII can be used either with pdftex or xetex (as you wish, compare
advantages/disadvantages
2011/3/14 Marco net...@lavabit.com
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand that
you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used?
MKII can be used either with pdftex or xetex (as you wish
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/3/14 Marco net...@lavabit.com
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof cldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand
that you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other
On 14-3-2011 7:26, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
2011/3/14 Marconet...@lavabit.com
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhofcldwester...@gmail.com wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand that
you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used?
MKII can be used
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 19:44, Marco wrote:
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof wrote:
2011/3/14 Marco wrote:
On 2011-03-14 Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When installing minimals you have MKII, XeTeX and MKIV. I understand
that you should normally use MKIV, but when are the other two used
script
20:47:02: first setup
20:53:23: generate MKII
20:54:07: generate XeTeX
20:54:49: generate MKIV
20:55:18: Installing/updating ConTeXt took 497 seconds
20:55:18: before using ConTeXt you have to run: '.
/home/cecil/ConTeXt/tex/setuptex'
But the output can be found in ${HOME
.
It generate almost no output:
20:47:01: fetch script
20:47:02: first setup
20:53:23: generate MKII
20:54:07: generate XeTeX
20:54:49: generate MKIV
20:55:18: Installing/updating ConTeXt took 497 seconds
20:55:18: before using ConTeXt you have to run: '.
/home
On 2011-03-14 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
xetex:
+ system fonts are easily accessible
- no protrusion, no font expansion
I never tried to use them, but I thought that Han The Thanh [please
add the accents] added that to XeTeX semi-recently
(http
Hello.
If I have a lot of inmargin or margintext, they will extend into the base of
the page (defined by bottomspace). Is there a way to remedy this by some
setup? This was compiled with xetex option b/c inmargin stack doesn't fully
work in mkiv.
Thanks,
Dinh
--
\setuppapersize[letter
Am 25.02.2011 um 05:20 schrieb Dinh Tran:
Hello,
Running the following context code doesn't seem to work with context
--luatex. Works with context --xetex however.
It works in a (currently private) beta but stacking isn’t perfect yet.
BTW: The --luatex switch isn’t necessary to run MkIV
Hello,
Running the following context code doesn't seem to work with context
--luatex. Works with context --xetex however.
--
\setuplayout[backspace=5cm,margin=3cm,margindistance=.5cm,width=middle]
\setupinmargin[stack=yes]
\starttext
A\margintext{A} B\margintext{B}.
C\inmargin{C} D
engine, but the propagation of
uppercase to subheadings is also encountered.
indeed, inheritance
3) numbercolor=red only works with luatex.
mkii (for pdftex/xetex) will not be patched so mkiv is the (future)
reference in this
I submit the pdf's also.
Hans
it
works and how it can be used?
(I must say I'm wondering a bit why problems with fonts are so
seldom discussed in the context list. In the last weeks I have seen
in the xetex list a discussion how to add missing glyphs to a font,
a discussion about kerning flaws, discussions about bad
in the world. Many of the discussions I see are
started by people trying to use non-western/non-latin scripts.
Sure. Anyhow, I'm not going to spend time following discussions on the
pdftex and xetex list as I don't use these engines and context support
for them is frozen. If context users have
this font should be useful for all formats which can
use it, so I don't think that a format specific location is
sensible.
(I must say I'm wondering a bit why problems with fonts are so
seldom discussed in the context list. In the last weeks I have seen
in the xetex list a discussion how to add
like that and support is
integrated into context (and targets at context). Also, there is an
experimental vf creation interface that will be extended.
(I must say I'm wondering a bit why problems with fonts are so
seldom discussed in the context list. In the last weeks I have seen
in the xetex
mentioned earlier that texexec could be replaced by mtxrun completely,
that only a bit is missing. Would this solve the problem?
it would solve the ruby dependency but pdftex/xetex need kpse
Hans
/cont-en.fmt
/Users/hans/TeX/ConTeXt/beta/tex/texmf-osx-64/web2c/pdftex/cont-nl.fmt
/Users/hans/TeX/ConTeXt/beta/tex/texmf-osx-64/web2c/xetex/cont-en.fmt
/Users/hans/TeX/ConTeXt/beta/tex/texmf-osx-64/web2c/xetex/cont-nl.fmt
Apparently none of them found! Vide this first message:
MTXrun | warning
/Users/hans/TeX/ConTeXt/beta/tex/texmf-osx-64/web2c/pdftex/cont-en.fmt
/Users/hans/TeX/ConTeXt/beta/tex/texmf-osx-64/web2c/pdftex/cont-nl.fmt
/Users/hans/TeX/ConTeXt/beta/tex/texmf-osx-64/web2c/xetex/cont-en.fmt
/Users/hans/TeX/ConTeXt/beta/tex/texmf-osx-64/web2c/xetex/cont-nl.fmt
looks ok
On 1-2-2011 1:40, Marco wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error while updating minimals:
MTXrun | run: texexec --make --all --fast --xetex cont-nl cont-enTeXExec |
using search method 'kpsewhich'
TeXExec | using existing database
TeXExec | using tex engine xetex
TeXExec | using tex format path
2011/2/1 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
On 1-2-2011 1:40, Marco wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error while updating minimals:
MTXrun | run: texexec --make --all --fast --xetex cont-nl cont-enTeXExec |
using search method 'kpsewhich'
TeXExec | using existing database
TeXExec | using tex engine
and xetex.
luatex seems ok.
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:51 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
i'll have a look at it (i only tested a luatex only tree sofar)
seem related only to pdftex and xetex.
luatex seems ok.
--
luigi
after
$mktexlsr
$texexec --make
builds all the pdftex formats
$texexec --make --engine
On 2011-02-01 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 1-2-2011 1:40, Marco wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error while updating minimals:
MTXrun | run: texexec --make --all --fast --xetex cont-nl cont-enTeXExec
| using search method 'kpsewhich' TeXExec | using existing database
TeXExec
Hi,
I get the following error while updating minimals:
MTXrun | run: texexec --make --all --fast --xetex cont-nl cont-enTeXExec |
using search method 'kpsewhich'
TeXExec | using existing database
TeXExec | using tex engine xetex
TeXExec | using tex format path /nonesuch/texmf/web2c/xetex
echo.
echo You need to install Ruby first (if you want to use pdfTeX or XeTeX).
echo Fetching files anyway.
echo.
:okay
set OWNPATH=%~dp0
set CONTEXTROOT=%OWNPATH%tex
set PATH=%OWNPATH%bin;%CONTEXTPATH%\texmf-mswin\bin;%PATH%
set CYGWIN=nontsec
rsync -av --exclude 'rsync.exe' --exclude 'cygwin1
the attached first-setup-alt.bat).
Best regards,
Lukas@echo off
setlocal
echo okay ok.log
ruby -e File.delete('ok.log')
if not exist ok.log goto okay
echo.
echo You need to install Ruby first (if you want to use pdfTeX or XeTeX).
echo Fetching files anyway.
echo.
:okay
set OWNPATH=%~dp0
set
/base/metapost/
minimals/current/fonts/common/ minimals/current/fonts/other/
minimals/current/misc/web2c minimals/current/base/xetex/
minimals/current/fonts/new/ minimals/current/fonts/new/
minimals/current/fonts/old/' '/opt/context/tex/texmf'
receiving incremental file list
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
MTXrun | run: rsync -rpztlv --delete
contextgarden.net::'minimals/current/base/tex/
minimals/current/base/metapost/ minimals/current/fonts/common/
minimals/current/fonts/other/ minimals/current/misc/web2c
minimals/current/base/xetex/ minimals
/other/ minimals/current/misc/web2c
minimals/current/base/xetex/ minimals/current/fonts/new/
minimals/current/fonts/new/ minimals/current/fonts/old/'
'/opt/context/tex/texmf'
MTXrun | run: rsync -rpztlv --delete
contextgarden.net::'minimals/current/context/beta/
minimals/current
][Minion at 34pt]
\starttext
\Minion
1234567890
\stoptext
This works in MKII (XeTeX). Please fix that. Thanks
add mode=node
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH
[minion][language=dflt, script=latn, onum=yes,
kern=yes, pnum=yes]
\definefontsynonym[Minion][MinionPro-Regular][features=minion]
\definefont[Minion][Minion at 34pt]
\starttext
\Minion
1234567890
\stoptext
This works in MKII (XeTeX). Please fix that. Thanks
add mode=node
1234567890
\stoptext
This works in MKII (XeTeX). Please fix that. Thanks
Yue Wang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http
Am Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:37:12 +0100 schrieb Thomas Schmitz:
I know that with the font fallback mechanism, it's
trivial to change fonts for unicode ranges,
Do you know where (roughly) the code for the fallback is? I would
like to know how it work.
--
Ulrike Fischer
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:02:03 +0100
Ulrike Fischer ne...@nililand.de wrote:
Do you know where (roughly) the code for the fallback
is? I would
like to know how it work.
--
You mean where it is actually defined in the core files? A
quick grep for fontfallback shows that it's in
Hi all,
on ctt, I just saw an annoucement for a xe(la)tex package
which I found quite interesting. Here's the description:
Location on CTAN: /macros/xetex/latex/ucharclasses
This package addresses one of the few features where TeX
still has to play catch-up to
word processing programs
On 21-12-2010 6:37, Thomas Schmitz wrote:
I was wondering: is something similar possible in mkiv yet? I know that
with the font fallback mechanism, it's trivial to change fonts for
unicode ranges, but is it possible to change hyphenation patterns (or
even insert arbitrary code) according to
texfont, but when I
type texfont at my linux-prompt, no texfont can be found? Do I need
to install additional tools to be able to build new fonts?
You normally don't need texfont nor any other tools.
What version of ConTeXt (MarkII or MarkIV) and if MarkII, which engine
(pdfTeX or XeTeX) do
OSFONTDIR to point to the folders
where you have your system fonts and they will be picked up
automatically. If you use XeTeX your system font should be found by
default.
You only need the right typescripts, but no font conversion at all.
Mojca
).
Alternatively you may configure OSFONTDIR to point to the folders
where you have your system fonts and they will be picked up
automatically. If you use XeTeX your system font should be found by
default.
You only need the right typescripts, but no font conversion at all.
Mojca
use ConTeXt;-) but TeXLive could use a default Arabic font as
well for XeTeX (a fellow SIL project); surprised it's not there already ...
But then ... I somehow find it a bit weird to have Arabic fallback
inside Latin Modern unless a user requests that explicitely and also
says which font he
-stuff.
In XeTeX it is possible to do so with \XeTeXglyph\XeTeXglyphindexQ.alt1 (or
Q.alt2). That would access the first (or second) alternate glyph for the letter
Q.
You really helped a lot here. Thank you!
Chris
test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
for XeTeX and ConTeXt MKIV that are now
available in drop-down menu by default.)
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman
is a frozen snapshot of context that runs on top of pdftex and xetex
- mkiv is the mainstream version and runs on top of luatex; it is a
rathere drastic rewrite + major upgrade and many internals are pretty
new but is mostly downward compatible as well
Hans
some magic tikz variable (or shared register) that
does not get reset?
I have no clue either, but this has never been a problem before and it
still works perfectly in both pdfTeX and XeTeX. So something really
looks suspicious on the MKIV part.
I would love to help debugging, but I have zero
example.
I have no clue ... maybe some magic tikz variable (or shared register) that
does not get reset?
I have no clue either, but this has never been a problem before and it
still works perfectly in both pdfTeX and XeTeX. So something really
looks suspicious on the MKIV part.
After some
, cslatex, ..., but they are not too
important.
by implementation (web2c, pdfTeX/pdfLaTeX, LuaTeX, others?)
No, that is called by engine: tex, pdftex, xetex, luatex are the
most important ones. Others not too important are known (ptex, ...)
MikTeX and TeX Live are not compatible, but I'm
On 17-11-2010 10:23, Peter Davis wrote:
1. by format (plain TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, others?)
there are others but they're sort of obsolete
2. by implementation (web2c, pdfTeX/pdfLaTeX, LuaTeX, others?)
see remarks by Mojca: engines (etex, pdftex, xetex, luatex),
implementation
Hello there.
I'm pretty new to ConTeXt and I'm really impressed by your work. So a
huge thanks is due.
Anyway. Today I found that Linux Libertine Bold Italic doesn't create
the ligatures. These work on XeTeX. I took a look at
/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/type-otf.mkiv where
Am 08.11.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Marco:
Hello there.
I'm pretty new to ConTeXt and I'm really impressed by your work. So a
huge thanks is due.
Anyway. Today I found that Linux Libertine Bold Italic doesn't create
the ligatures. These work on XeTeX. I took a look at
/tex/texmf-context
On 11/08/2010 03:53 PM, Marco wrote:
Hello there.
I'm pretty new to ConTeXt and I'm really impressed by your work. So a
huge thanks is due.
Anyway. Today I found that Linux Libertine Bold Italic doesn't create
the ligatures. These work on XeTeX. I took a look at
/tex/texmf-context/tex/context
Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com writes:
On 11/08/2010 03:53 PM, Marco wrote:
Hello there.
I'm pretty new to ConTeXt and I'm really impressed by your work. So a
huge thanks is due.
Anyway. Today I found that Linux Libertine Bold Italic doesn't create
the ligatures. These work on XeTeX
301 - 400 of 2328 matches
Mail list logo
