Hi Stuart;
--- Lun 23/4/12, Stuart Swales ha scritto:
...
en_GB dict? it's been in the source
tree for ages! See
http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/OOO330_m20/dictionaries/en/
Hmm.. we removed all the dictionaries from
the tree after the Apache move.
Can you add the latest
--- Gio 22/3/12, Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com ha scritto:
Hi List,
in http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
BSD (without advertising clause) is part of Category A. I
found no information in which category BSD *with advertising
clause* maybe? Does someone know this?
I
hello;
--- Mar 20/3/12, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net ha scritto:
...
Hi,
Just investigating and not acting:
libtextcat/data/new_fingerprints/fpdb.conf
This is based on this http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/TextCat/
which is LGPL, not maintained. We are in luck since
Apache
--- On Thu, 11/17/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
IMO the tango icons look uglier than the Galaxy icon set,
but it's just
a question of taste. And the Galaxy is the only one we can
be sure that
has all the required icons. (try the tango icon set and
you'll see that
--- On Thu, 9/29/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
OK. So [4] is a permissive license for all files in
the directory.
This may seen odd, coming from the FSF, but they encourage
this is some cases, such as when the code is very small,
or where the code promotes the use of an open
Hi Oliver;
--- On Thu, 9/29/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
...
Thanks for the input.
Adding the URL for the origin of the copyright and license
text is a good idea. I will add it and use it also to point
to the origin of ksc5601.h.
As Pedro researched the files are also found at
Hi;
There was an interesting cross-posting by Malte Timmermann
not long ago:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201109.mbox/ajax/%3c4e6dc5c3.9050...@gmx.com%3E
I am not suggesting it should be done now but perhaps
committing accfixes2 would help the IBM IA2 integration.
FWIW;
I don't like the patches because I can't really examine well
the code, besides this is something the VCS handles acceptably:
commit the original sourcecode and then apply the patches in a
different commit. If we start with up to date versions there
would not be much trouble.
just my $0.02,
Hi Oliver-Rainer;
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
I will now join the folks who are working on the clean up
regarding non-Apache license conform stuff.
Looking at the wiki - http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration -
provides some low-hanging fruits for me
Hi Bern;
From what I read, I don't think we want to get into all that
complexity right now. We have enough work already developing
OpenOffice to start developing something like EIS from
scratch :-(.
Perhaps there something opensource already that we can use to
some of the EIS functionality?
I
Well... now that I think about it ...
The linux header (which is actually an GNU iconv header),
can probably be dealt without too. The MIT licensed header
in XFree86 is not on X.Org anymore so they did something
about it.
Is OOo on a opengrok anywhere? It would be good to see where
such headers
.
(This will all change at some point, since Boost is being
incorporated into ISO C++. It is probably best to wait
for that to ripple out into the compiler distributions.)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pedro F. Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 08
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Well... now that I think about it
...
The linux header (which is actually an GNU iconv header),
can probably be dealt without too. The MIT licensed header
in XFree86 is not on X.Org anymore so they did something
about it.
X.Org uses git
FWIW;
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
...
If you mean ODMA.h, I don't believe
there is any dependency on it and you should just get rid of
it.
If you need to deal with it as third-party code, I can get
you a version with a BSD-variant license that
--- On Wed, 9/28/11, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
...
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:42 PM,
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
It is unlikely that machine-generated files of any
kind are copyrightable subject matter.
I'd imagine that Pixar, for instance, would have a problem
with that
blanket statement...
FWIW,
It may be like fitting a square peg in a round hole but there is something
similar coming to Apache:
http://incubator.apache.org/opennlp/index.html
Pedro
Hello;
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Shane Curcuru wrote:
..
I.e. there are cases where Apache projects may want to
include Category-B (EPL, CPL, MPL, etc.) tools within a
distribution. This is permitted in binary form, but
not source form.
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but dmake as we have
Hi;
I thought it would be a good time to bring this subject
up again.
--- On Sat, 9/10/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
and i completely forgot to mention that i've got a
linear MQ patch
series applying against OOO340 that contains the
following:
...
ause131
ause130
writerfilter10
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Shane Curcuru wrote:
..
I.e. there are cases where Apache projects may
want to include Category-B (EPL, CPL, MPL, etc.)
tools within a distribution. This is permitted
in binary form, but not
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
As Rob Weir has put it ...
...
So obviously there is limited volunteer bandwidth to
migrate the wiki.
And I've heard from several people, on and off
the list, that much of what is on the wiki is
not very useful.
uh,
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
Another point that Rob brought would be if we need a
SGA
to add the Groovy (or other) extension.
I would think an SGA is a rather extreme thing to
require
for extensions: we wouldn't require that if we want
to
include
--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
Bringing it into SVN is easy. Making it into a
release is another
question. To do that requires going through the IP
Clearance process.
Yes, I was obviously referring to the legal requirements.
I'm willing to debate it for
Hi;
--- On Mon, 9/26/11, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what IS going on? Anybody?
I think (thought?) Pedro was kind of coordinating the test
of Confluence with the infra folks but ???
Unfortunately not. I asked infra@ and they didn't answer: I
understand they expect us to
Hello;
As you all might've been thinking, one of the things
we really have to move out of the tree is dmake so I
just helped dmake step out by moving it to it's own
repo at Google Code.
http://code.google.com/p/ooo-dmake/
Why Google Code and not apache-extras you might
wonder: Dmake is
to start from scratch.
FWIW, today I made my first and final release :-P.
Pedro.
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
...
On 22/09/2011 Pedro F. Giffuni
wrote:
Hi Gianluca;
Is your work related to this version?
http://members.xoom.it/trasforma/ispell/
Just wondering if we have
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
HunSpell code is tri-licensed under GPL/LGPL/MPL.
That particular licensing scheme is rather weird: LGPL
implies that it can become GPL so you could just say
dual licensed LGPL/MPL, and then, once you make something
pluggable, the
Hi Yakov;
--- On Fri, 9/23/11, Yakov Reztsov yakovr...@mail.ru wrote:
22 сентября 2011, 20:29 от Pedro F. Giffuni:
HunSpell is copyleft so we cannot include it.
Hi!
Hunspell is C++ library under GPL/LGPL/MPL
tri-license. (http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/).
http://www.apache.org
Hello juergen;
I think the file should be named NOTICE (without the .txt extension):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/
Cheers,
Pedro.
condescending.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/22/11, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
...
2011/9/21 Pedro F. Giffuni
If some of the dictionary files can be relicensed
under
an Apache License I would consider including them
there
too but I would prefer to keep any copyleft stuff out
of
the new
Hi;
--- On Thu, 9/22/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
Thanks for this point. NSS is not certified and given
the
where the heck did you get that idea?
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/140val-all.htm#1280
Ugh.. there's something broken in the iPad safari
search option.
,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/22/11, Gianluca Turconi in...@letturefantastiche.com wrote:
From: Gianluca Turconi in...@letturefantastiche.com
Subject: Re: ooo-myspell at apache-extras.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, giffu...@tutopia.com
Date: Thursday, September 22, 2011, 10:41 AM
2011/9/22 Pedro F
Hello guys;
I have created a new project at apache-extras.org to preserve
MySpell:
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-myspell/
There's not much there yet: basically just the original
tarball I got from OpenOffice.org, but I felt it was
important to preserve this code in some way.
--- On Mon, 9/19/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
2011/9/19 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
...
do you mean to check in the files under ext_source
into svn and remove it
later on when we have cleaned up the code. Or do you
mean to put it
somehwere on apache
--- On Sat, 9/17/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
OpenSSL is a a validated module when run in FIPS mode:
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/1401val2009.htm#
But that would still apply to AES, not Blowfish.
Think of it this way: FIPS 140 defines what
Dear Apache OpenOffice.org community;
I have been authorized, and it is my pleasure, to share
with you the good news ...
The Beanshell scripting language will be made available
soon under the Apache License version 2. Later on, this
month, the website will be updated to reflect that:
Hi again;
I think I found the missing piece in the puzzle ...
OOo already uses OpenSSL, but in order to replace nss we need support for
xmlsecurity. This library provides just that under an MIT license:
http://www.aleksey.com/xmlsec/
Alternatively Apache has it#39;s own stuff:
Ugh ... nevermind, we already carry xmlsec !
I guess we have everything to get rid of nss but we are not using it right?
Apache Santuario is interesting though.
Cheers, Pedro.
.
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Am 29.08.2011 17:41, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
Looking a bit into Matthias' list, there's the saxon
issue.
I looked for a replacement and it would look like the
Apache Xalan project could be an alternative:
http://xalan.apache.org
Thanks Tor, this is all good to know!
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
...
The question is why do we need
this? I would think
all supported platforms have standard conformant
C/C++ libs.
Yeah, but the code uses non-standard library functions,
apparently.
Both of
Hello Terry;
Thanks for doing this last stuff for us!
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Terry Ellison ter...@apache.org wrote:
...
3. I am still concerned about this whole issue of content
attribution. IIRC, under the old OCA contributors only
vested joint rights to Sun/Oracle and free licence on any
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
In FreeBSD we were using an independent library in
some ports to
support getopt_long but the regular library now
supports the GNU
extensions. If it's needed it can be taken from
there.
if it's not in a C standard at least 20 years old
Ahem ...
Guys;
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
...
If you list the functions you have in
mind, and the names of the headers normally used to
introduce their signatures, I will double-check the VC++
2008 and VC++ 2010 libraries to see what the status
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
..
Backing up a little. I don't
know if the original BSD license is a problem for Apache,
but it becomes a problem downstream, so it is good to avoid
having to carry that license and a NOTICE file about it
around in
Welcome zhong zhao!
It's nice to see people from China joining.. I guess this
project will be really alive in all timezones! :).
Pedro.
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, 赵忠 zhaozh...@300.cn wrote:
...
Hi all:
I am working for the company, RedFlag 2000(China),and start
to develope office suit two months
really need or we wait for
the next version and hope the problem goes away.
Thanks for the help.
-Original Message-
From: Pedro F. Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 12:57 PM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Herter, Scott
Subject: Re: Problem
.
As for the list, I looked around, there isn't much here yet
so this seemed the best fit.
Are there other lists that would be better or is the
project not quite that far along yet?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Pedro F. Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September
--- On Mon, 9/12/11, Matt Richards mricha...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Quick question (or perhaps a discussion point). With
all this talk about how things used to be built in a
data center in Hamburg. I am wondering how the
release/build process works with Apache projects. Does the
ASF provide
Hi Rob;
--- On Mon, 9/12/11, Rob Weir wrote:
..
I'd summarize it as saying that merging code Apache code
into LibreOffice will be really difficult, especially
since LibreOffice has made widespread source changes.
Is there anything we can do to help LibreOffice out here?
Develop faster
--- On Sun, 9/11/11, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
... But the ready for QA and
approved by QA
states are lost. Or did someone take notes on those?
FWIW,
Michael Stahl mentioned these on 21.08.2011
__
readyforQA 3.4:
mh8tz
sw34bf06
mingwport35
tkr41
__
--- On Thu, 9/8/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
...
Pedro, just a quick clarification,
My understanding is that Infra doesn't do content
conversions of the kind we are talking about.
It is all volunteer work and it is up to the PPMC to
resource such things.
Hi;
--- On Thu, 9/8/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
Which version of ICU is used in LibreOffice? If they use a
newer one,
this probably can tell us about possible surprises.
The FreeBSD port uses 4.8.1 (with local patches). so it
looks like they use system icu already.
I
--- On Thu, 9/8/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
I see you closed INFRA-3917.
I like to clean my own mess, yes.
Keep in mind that there appear to be others willing to
struggle with Confluence migration (CWiki?).
That makes me very happy!
Anyone can reopen the issue: the problem I see is
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 06/09/11 05:34, Jean Weber a écrit :
Hi Jean, all,
I am afraid we must still do this. Perhaps it's
easier to find the people that oppose ..
Can we legally make a call to everyone that
opposes the change to speak up before
a
to it.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
(This just required a new subject header)
Hi;
As you know the bugzilla database is working already
(very
well to be honest) but the UI interface changes were
not
brought in due to the extremely outdated version
(3.2.10
FWIW,
The external sources include a lot of stuff that is
outdated and there may even be security risks involved.
I think I posted a list of outdated stuff before and
on FreeBSD I made sure we carry natively the latest
versions (with some care for compatibility).
Also there's the issue that was
.
Pedro.
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu wrote:
2011.09.07. 18:10 keltezéssel, Pedro F. Giffuni írta:
Great! Thanks to Matt!!
One thing I didn't mention and that may be
interesting for international users is that
the new bugzilla can
be customized for other
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Eike Rathke wrote:
I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated,
what issues with headers are you referring?
Eike
I am not sure exactly when the ICU license changed but
the first ICU versions had a restrictive license.
We have some code from ICU in
Hi;
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, James Steinbraker wrote:
I am a OOo user and have been wanting
to ask but have not had the time. Does anyone know when
version 3.4 may be released for broad user consumption? That
is my only question. But I do understand that the code needs
to be correct before
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
The IP of some of our i18n files is unclear and someone
(you?) pointed out that they have been copied from ICU.
We should clean that up. But that is not related to the
ICU external tarball.
Hmm.. I thought we could use the same headers
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
..
I also have not kept up with the discussion but reading
Terry's comments there seem to be a very huge task to
migrate out of Mediawiki. However then I see that due
to lack of Mediawiki support - we are moving to
Confluence.
Isnt this
Hello Eike;
From what I discussed with Rob there is no objection
on his side wrt to integrating the CWS'.
I was waiting for the FreeBSD port to go through before
pushing this further, but in general the idea here is
that lazy consensus applies: no one objected so the
issue is left for those that
the
DNS
entries? In my mind, if there is already a lot of
content on the MW and
the
Apache Foundation allows us to continue to use
it, why not?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Pedro F.
Giffuni giffu
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So I don't think we can give an answer set in stone.
Again, section 5 of the Apache License is clear enough.
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
wrote:
So I don't think we can give an answer set in
stone.
Again, section 5 of the Apache License is clear
enough
I made a call for this before but maybe it was lost:
Do we have a bugzilla UI expert here?
I have just learned that indeed the templates for
the older bugzilla are available.
cheers,
Pedro.
Hello;
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Pedro has already gone over to check
with Infrastructure about doing a test.
...
Regards,
Dave
Yes, here is the post I sent to the infrastructure guys.
I guess they have the MW data and the confluence know-how
but it
(This just required a new subject header)
Hi;
As you know the bugzilla database is working already (very
well to be honest) but the UI interface changes were not
brought in due to the extremely outdated version (3.2.10)
the old site was running.
Apparently it is not a difficult task and it
--- On Mon, 9/5/11, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
...
We have established that relicensing the existing OOo user
guides (which are licensed CC-BY) to the Apache license
is not practical.
Does this mean, as Rob has suggested, that these guides
*cannot* be part of the official
Hi Jean;
Continuing on the topic of my general ignorance ...
--- On Mon, 9/5/11, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
...
It's not clear to me that the user guides produced by
ODFAuthors are in fact official documentation even
though they are made available as ODT and PDF through
the OOo
Hmm ...
It looks like I missed where the decision to use MediaWiki and deprecate
confluence
was taken. I guess it was arranged with infra as long as MW is up to date and
the extensions are documented.
I am not complaining though: it sounds like lazy consensus in action plus we can
always change
--- On Sun, 9/4/11, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
...
Example 1:
- A posting in LO mailinglist from Sept 2010 says:
Creating a 'bug' saw no action in 3 years
Here is hoping that posting the patch to this
new project will :-)
(There goes one developer that will probably
--- On Sun, 9/4/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
...
As addition:
It's also about code quality and stability.
I have never said the contrary.
Currently we have already a (relative) stable code with the
released OOo 3.4 Beta. So, it would be IMHO not clever to
through in all the new code from
Ahh.. found it!
The problem is solved in section 5 of the
Apache License:
___
5. Submission of Contributions.
Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted
for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and
conditions of this
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
--- On Fri, 9/2/11, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org
wrote:
Is it worth contacting the authors of these dictionaries to
see if they would consider giving it a license we can use?
Simply +1.
No need to vote.. just do it (TM).
to OpenOffice that would now see that
their are efforts better appreciated elsewhere.
It's just 24 bugs with patches: we can do them all
before the next release (likely to happen next year).
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 09/03/2011 04:39 AM, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
Hi
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi Marcus;
The exact flag in bugzilla is 3.4_release_blocker.
Not including *ALL* these 24 bugs for the next
release
would be like saying to our contributors that we
Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Neapolitan is classified as a dialect, not a language,
for
good reasons.
It's in ISO 639-2 so it's a language, and it's distinct
from Italian. Among the local languages spoken in Italy, we
already fully support the four
Hi;
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Dale Erwin d...@casaerwin.org wrote:
...
Spoken like a true northern Italian bigot... with all due
respect.
Please note I did not call you a northern Italian bigot...
I said you speak like one. Maybe you are just
misinformed.
I should've thought better before
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
...
Only because a patch it's included in LibO we should not
include it automaticly here. There are many reasons to not
include a pach.
- Lisence Problems
- The Patch is not compatible with other Operating system.
- The patch is
Hi;
I went through the early LibreOffice archives
checking which issues from our database they
considered for inclusion.
I have to say it was a GREAT idea to start
from the tip of the Hg development tree as
most fixes already appear closed (applied
or integrated to a CWS).
The following 24 open
--- On Fri, 9/2/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Is it worth contacting the authors of these dictionaries to
see if they would consider giving it a license we can use?
My standard boilerplate reply was:
Please note that we will not receive contributions under
copyleft licenses
Hi Dale;
With due respect to Italy's cultural richness (which I so
much admire being italian myself but not only because of that),
Neapolitan is classified as a dialect, not a language, for
good reasons.
Compared to standard italian you use the same character set
and gramatical rules.
While here,
Can Apache projects rely on Mozilla's nss (MPL)?
I looked for alternatives but I only found the java based
Bouncy Castle:
http://www.bouncycastle.org/
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/1/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
From: Dennis E. Hamilton
I think it works fine, perhaps Ray got confused with the infra JIRA, which, of
course, manages the infrastructure for all projects.
Not that it matters too much, but ... Do we have a bugzilla template expert? It
would be good if we could make it look like the previous one. Perhaps we
can even
--- On Tue, 8/30/11, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
...
This is an important question. If we need another
preprocessor there are options(1), but we need to now
why.
At least for idlc, I think the best solution would be to
get rid of a C preprocessor completely. Even if
de-facto (if not
--- On Tue, 8/30/11, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
...
(I don't know who wrote this ... )
I'd like to see commit log/messages containing the
number of fixed issue referenced and no commit
messages without that number.
So people would not be allowed to improve things without
first
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
...
For the production instance, are we preserving the
original login/passwords, or will they also be all
set to password?
I understand, from the comment in JIRA, that people
will have to reset them from their email accounts.
Pedro.
Looking a bit into Matthias' list, there's the saxon issue.
I looked for a replacement and it would look like the
Apache Xalan project could be an alternative:
http://xalan.apache.org/
If, for some reason, we want to keep saxon, please note:
- In principle it would seem like it's required
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
...
On Linux it always was needed in OOo, either from system or
- in case
BUILD_EPM=YES - from the ooo module epm. If you want to do
it differently, send patches. :-)
If I ever work on the build system, it will be very
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
With the cleanup of this license headers we can try to
remove the code in one place and reuse it.
LCC is not copyleft and in our particular use it may be
OK, but some provisions could be problematic:
lexer.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
...
This is an important question. If we need another
preprocessor there are options(1), but we need to now
why.
cheers,
Pedro.
(1) http://mcpp.sourceforge.net/
Hi Dennis;
Hmm... no need to copy everyone that should already
subscribed to the list :-)
Perhaps just put up a note on the blog that the code is finally in?
Eike did the commit of the missing files so things are being worked
on but for now we need to be careful not to break things. Mathias'
--- On Sun, 8/28/11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
...
trademarks in your book or article.
http://apache.org/foundation/marks/
Nobody has to ask to use the term Apache OpenOffice.org.
But it is preferred that the booktitile is Apache
OpenOffice.org 3.3 für Ein-und Umsteiger.
Actually, I
FWIW, the code is there since yesterday :) ... Anyone wants the honor of
commiting the missing files?
Cheers,
Pedro.
Thanks Mark and everybody else involved!
I do prefer this approach than the stepped transition
that was planned previously. Here we know what we got
and people don't have to spend time finishing the
migration in the background.
It does look sane: attachments are still there, which
is the main
Hi;
--- On Sun, 8/21/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Soon, I hope, the OOo code will be checked into SVN.
After that happens I think we need to coordinate on
the next steps. I know that several of us have code
they'd like to check-in, CWS's to integrate, LGPL code
to remove, etc.
Hi again;
- Original Message -
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
...
We're only checking in the tip of the trunk into SVN. The history is
going to Apache-Extras, and remaining in Hg. I don't see how you
would use the history to verify a SVN
--- On Mon, 8/15/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
We've been discussing for two months
now how to get Hg over to SVN.
There have been several suggestions for how the CWS's and
complete revision history could be migrated over, but
little progress has been made. Either the
Hi again;
--- On Mon, 8/15/11, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
The migration to Apache-Extras is the easy part,
right? It is just Hg to Hg. So we maintain the
complete revision history that way.
Iff apache-extras offers sufficient space for the
repository.
Actually, I am not very
--- On Mon, 8/15/11, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
...
I look at it this way: What do we need to do to
unblock the greatest number of people on the
project? Getting the wiki migrated enables many
contributors. Getting SVN working does the same.
Bugzilla is mainly useful once we are
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
