:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
I'm working with Gav to get the timeout upped as that's what's
causing the builds to fail (long delays when the built site gets
checked back in). I will let you know once I have things ready
.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
I'm working with Gav to get the timeout upped
: Sunday, December 11, 2011 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
I'm working with Gav to get the timeout upped as that's what's
causing the builds to fail (long delays when the built site gets
checked back in). I will let you know once I have things ready
for you to make
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
I'm working with Gav to get the timeout upped as that's what's
causing the builds to fail (long delays when the built site gets
checked back
no trouble.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
I'm working with Gav to get
@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
I'm working with Gav to get the timeout upped as that's what's
causing the builds to fail (long delays when the built site gets
checked back in). I will let you
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
It is worth repeating the three special redirection cases. Two are desired
and one I think makes sense to me, it probably deserves its own thread.
(1) redirect requests to security.openoffice.org to
On Dec 12, 2011, at 4:58 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
It is worth repeating the three special redirection cases. Two are desired
and one I think makes sense to me, it probably deserves its own thread.
(1) redirect
BTW -
A footer change is now appearing on ooo-site.staging.apache.org/ !
The link to license.html is present. Someone please review and commit changes
to ooo-site/trunk/content/license.html. It needs work.
I'll get to the topnav and breadcrumbs later. No delays to migration from me.
Regards,
Great!
Now I want to participate in Openoffice.org is linked to project
site http://incubator.apache.org/openoffice;. I want to know which
site should non-programming contributors like QA/Marketing/NL/Art
Design visit. http://incubator.apache.org/openoffice; or
http://ooo-site.apache.org/;? There
On 28/11/2011 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
ps. Andrea, please do link the document in the new site :).
Done some days ago in revision 1212124, but it doesn't show up on the
live instance. And actually I can't see the previous commit by you
either (revision 1203948), so I'm probably looking at the
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 28/11/2011 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
ps. Andrea, please do link the document in the new site :).
Done some days ago in revision 1212124, but it doesn't show up on the live
instance. And actually I can't see the previous commit by you
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 28/11/2011 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
ps. Andrea, please do link the document in the new site :).
Done some days ago in revision 1212124, but it doesn't show up on the
Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
but I don't see the change (Protezione dei Dati su Apache OpenOffice) at
http://ooo-site.apache.org/it/contribuire/legale.html
Should I use a different URL?
Try http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/
The publish step has not
On Dec 11, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 28/11/2011 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
ps. Andrea, please do link the document in the new site :).
Done some days ago
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM,
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 8:48 AM,
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Rob Weir
On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dave Fisher
On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
I've already answered. I've been very clear. Nothing has stopped others from
working on ooo-site.
I apologize if I was not clear. I'm not interested in
extended duration of
this particular thread. Although thanks for the inviting mention.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 12:06
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
[ ... ]
Again
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
I've already answered. I've been very clear. Nothing has stopped others
from working on
because it is in a
terrible state, but that will take more time.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
[ ... ]
Again, the ability to edit absent the ability to publish, is not going
to encourage effective collaboration.
Let's get to release early and often on the website. Waiting months
for the ability to publish is not healthy for the community
will be updated,
how do you want to co-ordinate that?
Regards,
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
I'm working with Gav to get the timeout upped as that's what's
causing the builds to fail (long delays when the built site gets
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 11/28/2011 09:33 AM, schrieb Arthur Buijs:
On 11/24/2011 01:05 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Kay,
I have some concerns that the buildbot broke recently. Also, somehow
my checkout of ooo-site was busted with a lock.
On 11/24/2011 01:05 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Kay,
I have some concerns that the buildbot broke recently. Also, somehow
my checkout of ooo-site was busted with a lock. I am currently doing
a re-checkout.
On Nov 23, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
OK, I understand. As a point of
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Arthur Buijs art...@artietee.nl wrote:
On 11/24/2011 01:05 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Kay,
I have some concerns that the buildbot broke recently. Also, somehow
my checkout of ooo-site was busted with a lock. I am currently doing
a re-checkout.
On Nov 23,
Am 11/28/2011 09:33 AM, schrieb Arthur Buijs:
On 11/24/2011 01:05 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Kay,
I have some concerns that the buildbot broke recently. Also, somehow
my checkout of ooo-site was busted with a lock. I am currently doing
a re-checkout.
On Nov 23, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Kay Schenk
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I work on porting legacy info over, I am wondering what to do
about the more developer centered areas of the site: api, sc, sw,
framework, external (?
On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 11/24/11 6:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
2011/11/24 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com
On 11/23/11 5:55 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I work on porting legacy info over,
On 24/11/2011 Dave Fisher wrote:
Yes and I would avoid doing anymore N-L projects.
Since Khirano is willing to do a translation of the
new main site. If Pedro and the other Italians and MArcus
and the other Germans. Plus Alexandro and the Spanish are in
Consensus to do translations of the new
Hi;
First of all ...
+1 To Andrea's general opinion in this email and
welcome as a committer!
I spent some time on the new Italian site (just playing
with Apache CMS) and I updated the links to use relative
URLS and the legal information, but I think thats about
what I was planning to do with
On 11/24/11 6:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
2011/11/24 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com
On 11/23/11 5:55 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I work on porting legacy info over, I am wondering what to do
about the more developer
On 11/23/11 5:55 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I work on porting legacy info over, I am wondering what to do
about the more developer centered areas of the site: api, sc, sw,
framework, external (? -- I need to look at this one),
, 2011 08:56
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I work on porting legacy info over, I am wondering what to
do
about the more developer centered areas of the site: api
2011/11/24 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
On 11/23/11 5:55 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I work on porting legacy info over, I am wondering what to do
about the more developer centered areas of the site: api, sc, sw,
instructions should be encouraged
this way until the IP Clearance has been completed.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 01:10
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice
-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
it sounds like a Déjà vu and i think we had already a discussion that
goes in this direction.
Yes, i totally agree on this separation and it makes sense to me. Moving
forward with this separation we need much less migration
Hi, Marcus,
Off-topic (re PS:), but couldn't resist.
On 11/24/2011 18:42, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 11/22/2011 06:54 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
[...]
I would rather preserve those URLs. The shorter ones are nice and the
old ones could redirect to them. And I wouldn't do this quickly
Am 11/25/2011 02:04 AM, schrieb TJ Frazier:
Hi, Marcus,
Off-topic (re PS:), but couldn't resist.
On 11/24/2011 18:42, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 11/22/2011 06:54 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
[...]
I would rather preserve those URLs. The shorter ones are nice and the
old ones could redirect
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I work on porting legacy info over, I am wondering what to do
about the more developer centered areas of the site: api, sc, sw,
framework, external (? -- I need to look at this one), tools,porting, and
many others that are not
to the live content are in our custody.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 08:56
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early
custody.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 08:56
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 08:56
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I work on porting legacy info over
Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 08:56
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
+1...all good, and something we had discussed early on.
However, as I work on porting legacy info over, I am
+1, makes sense to me :)
On 22.11.2011 00:46, Rob Weir wrote:
We have with this project something that most other Apache projects
don't have and which the legacy OOo project never had. We have two
independent websites.
We have the legacy www.openoffice.org website, which served as an
end-user
it sounds like a Déjà vu and i think we had already a discussion that
goes in this direction.
Yes, i totally agree on this separation and it makes sense to me. Moving
forward with this separation we need much less migration and can
concentrate on the most important pages of the main portal
+1
Marcus
Am 11/22/2011 11:24 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
it sounds like a Déjà vu and i think we had already a discussion that
goes in this direction.
Yes, i totally agree on this separation and it makes sense to me. Moving
forward with this separation we need much less migration and can
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
it sounds like a Déjà vu and i think we had already a discussion that
goes in this direction.
Yes, i totally agree on this separation and it makes sense to me. Moving
forward with this separation we need much less migration
We have with this project something that most other Apache projects
don't have and which the legacy OOo project never had. We have two
independent websites.
We have the legacy www.openoffice.org website, which served as an
end-user portal for OpenOffice as well as a website for project
OpenOffice project.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 15:46
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites
[ ... ]
For example, could we have something like this:
1) www.openoffice.org is the website
57 matches
Mail list logo
