On 2012-10-24 9:27 AM Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I have provided full install set for all supported languages and a
further language pack for en-US + the SDK and src release.
I can't find the en-US language pack. I get the following message:
Not Found
The requested URL
On 2012-10-25 10:24 PM Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-10-24 9:27 AM Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I have provided full install set for all supported languages and a
further language pack for en-US + the SDK and src release.
I can't find the en-US language pack. I get the following message:
Not Found
On 2012-10-20 12:49 PM Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Well most of the artwork is done, is just a matter of doing the commit to
the right branch. Linux has png files so they are taken from the site,
which also has the .ico and icm for windows and mac. Besides that, I wonder
what else would be needed.
On 2012-10-18 8:10 AM Fan Zhengzhou wrote:
Personally, I think the cloudy Openoffice would be a better choice. For
based on it, we need not to care about the different specifications among
the popular devices.
That would be a bad choice. Users could only use OpenOffice when they had access to
On 2012-10-18 9:38 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
On Oct 18, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Donald Whytock wrote:
Will membership in the mailing lists be copied over to new lists?
Yes. (exception is private)
Or
are the existing lists getting renamed?
Yes.
The old lists will forward to the new when these are
://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/MultiCloud
cheers,
Pedro.
From: Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: Open Office on IOS ?
On 2012-10-18 8:10 AM Fan Zhengzhou wrote:
Personally
On 2012-10-11 5:50 PM Fernando Cassia wrote:
No, it would be better if consumers educated themselves and purchased
an AMD or Intel x86 based tablet (I favor AMD Fusion myself), where
you can install ANY OS you want, including standard x86 Linux (Fedora,
Ubuntu, etc), and run standard Apache
On 2012-10-03 12:42 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 11/09/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 05/09/2012 Larry Gusaas wrote:
Is any work being done on this serious bug on Macs OS X ver. 10.7
10.8? There have been many help requests on the user forum and on the
ooo-users mailing list.
I confirm we
On 2012-09-06 1:26 AM Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I use 10.7.4 and still can't reproduce it. I tried a force quit several
times with open documents and every time the document recovery started,
finished and the office was ready to work.
The bug isn't about document recovery, it is the new app window
On 2012-09-05 2:09 PM Larry Gusaas wrote:
Is any work being done on this serious bug on Macs OS X ver. 10.7 10.8? There have been
many help requests on the user forum and on the ooo-users mailing list.
For your information, this bug also affects LibreOffice, see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org
On 2012-09-06 3:46 AM Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/6/12 9:59 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-09-06 1:26 AM Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I use 10.7.4 and still can't reproduce it. I tried a force quit several
times with open documents and every time the document recovery started,
finished and the office
Is any work being done on this serious bug on Macs OS X ver. 10.7 10.8? There have been many
help requests on the user forum and on the ooo-users mailing list.
There are many duplicate bug reports open for this issue:
Bug 119006 - Restore windows problem
Bug 119236 - Restoring windows
On 2012-09-05 2:36 PM Juergen Schmidt wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. September 2012 um 22:09 schrieb Larry Gusaas:
Is any work being done on this serious bug on Macs OS X ver. 10.7 10.8?
There have been many
help requests on the user forum and on the ooo-users mailing list.
I am not aware of any
+1
On 2012-08-19 9:52 AM Rob Weir wrote:
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
willingness/readiness to govern ourselves. If this vote passes then
we continue by drafting a charter, submitting it for IPMC
On 2012-07-26 12:02 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Has anyone upgraded yet and tried installing 3.4.0 or 3.4.1? I heard
that having a digital signature is now required. Is that true? Any
workarounds? Anything we should put in the release notes about
Mountain Lion?
-Rob
Haven't upgraded, my Mac is too
On 2012-07-17 12:40 AM Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:09 AM, ironmancopel...@aol.com wrote:
Hello sir/ma'am,
I would like to inquire on how to fix a recent problem i have been having.
when i first open, open office i get a pop up that reads
restore windows
The application
On 2012-07-17 1:15 AM Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I agree in general to you and thanks for summarizing this topic. I have
only one point to add, why should we mention potential problems that we
can't reproduce? In this case I would not mention it, it would be
different if we couldn't fix the problem.
On 2012-07-17 2:38 PM Joe Schaefer wrote:
From: Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: On parks, commons, and websites... and fun (or lack of)
Let's be clear: I don't have the
should just keep your mouth shut.
- Original Message -
From: Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: On parks, commons, and websites... and fun (or lack of)
On 2012-07-17 2:38 PM Joe Schaefer wrote
On 2012-07-17 3:04 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Please, everyone. Let's not pile on this thread with more name
calling, etc., in the heat of the moment.
Let's set it aside and see tomorrow if there is anything more that
should be said. We accomplish nothing with rapid-fire, emotional
responses.
I
On 2012-07-14 5:48 PM Kay Schenk wrote:
I think the above bug you cited is not a java 1.6 vs 1.7 issue, It's a
can't find java issue. I will do some more research tomorrow to see if
there is a really a java 1.6 vs java 1.7 issue. I do remember seeing
complaints about not being able to find
On 2012-07-12 1:06 PM Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
Le jeu. 12 juil. 2012 00:39:17 CEST, Joe Schaefer
On 2012-07-12 3:48 PM Joe Schaefer wrote:
Hello? Is this thing on? This project has a whopping
9GB website that all of maybe 5 people on the planet
know how to takecare of, and it is rife with stale
information inherited from a different past. The website
is a*community* resource and that
On 2012-07-12 11:01 PM Joe Schaefer wrote:
This list, unlike the forums, is about project development, and teaching
others to behave in productive ways by*demonstrating* the behavior
you want to see from others here.
Why don't you look in the bloody mirror. You are demonstrating how to be an
On 2012-06-11 6:44 AM Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Best of all, Apache OpenOffice can be downloaded and used entirely free
of any license fees.
Please change back to the correct English spelling, licence, used in most of the English
speaking world. Spelling is license is an American mutation.
On 2012-06-03 5:35 PM Albino B Neto wrote:
Hi.
2012/6/3 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=openoffice_org_is_now_apache
Good text.
Albino
The line The .org is now in Apache makes no sense at all.
The only people who will understand the
On 2012-05-27 8:38 AM Ina Marantz wrote concerning NewWikiMainPage:
I'm trying to find out if I can use OpenOffice with a Mac. I don't see this
information anywhere.
You can use Apache OpenOffice 3.4 on Intel Macs. See system requirements at:
On 2012-05-18 1:40 PM Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 2012-05-18, at 14:18 , Chery wrote:
It is free! Who would buy it from you?
OpenOffice has always been sold on eBay and other similar sites. The advantage
to the buyer is that she does not have to download the app., can have it
On 2012-05-13 3:08 PM drew wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 20:17 +0100, Lou Devlin wrote:
I cannot see a UK version for download
Can you help?
Hello Lou,
I presume you are asking in regards to a binary package marked en_GB
rather then en_US, yes? For this release there was none, language
On 2012-05-11 2:56 PM Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Louis Suárez-Pottslui...@gmail.comwrote:
NO, to reply to myself, that is Good-Day's.
I do have it on my system, and can post it to a server if you tell me
where. It is, however, Oracle PDF Import, if that
On 2012-04-22 1:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Actually I can't reproduce this error, I got the right file. Can you please confirm that
this issue is still open?
Yes. I click on the PPC 3.2.1 en-US download and it gives me the current 3.3
On 2012-04-22 7:06 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-04-22 1:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Actually I can't reproduce this error, I got the right file. Can you
please
On 2012-04-22 7:39 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-04-22 7:06 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2012-04-22 1:45 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
On
On 2012-04-22 7:41 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
I'm running Mac OS X version 10.6.8 using Safari version 5.1.5
I go to http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html and under Mac OS PPC ¹
DMG/English (US) click on 3.2.1
That takes me to:
http
On 2012-04-22 8:19 PM Larry Gusaas wrote:
I tried Firefox 11.0 and it redirected to
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/latest/download?_test=sidebarand
and downloaded the Intel version OOo_3.3.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
I tried Firefox 11.0 again. This time it did
+1 (non-binding)
Larry
On 2012-04-20 6:58 PM Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache OpenOffice 3.4
(incubating). This will be the first incubator release for Apache OpenOffice and a key
milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice.org.
On 2012-03-31 5:55 AM Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.comwrote:
Good. You finally gave an useful response. Why didn't you do so in your
first response to me?
I was not responding to you. i was responding to Cody Miller who asked the
original
On 2012-03-30 8:00 AM Rob Weir wrote:
#1 is easy, and in fact is already done, via extensions. For example, this
extension allows the user to save/retrieve documents to a variety of cloud
storage providers, including Amazon, DropBox, Google, SkyDrive, etc:
On 2012-03-30 11:50 AM Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2012-03-30 8:00 AM Rob Weir wrote:
#1 is easy, and in fact is already done, via extensions. For example,
this
extension allows the user to save/retrieve documents to a
On 2012-03-30 3:45 PM Rob Weir wrote:
I think you are just being argumentative, looking at the microscopic
details without understanding the generality of the user's question or my
response.
I just responded to your question. I don't see any technical reason why one could not code the
same
On 2012-03-30 7:56 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.comwrote:
I just corrected your inaccurate statement. #1 is easy, and in fact is
already done, via extensions.
The extension exists. I linked to it. The fact that a plugin only
supports
On 2012-03-30 10:16 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.comwrote:
Quit trying to weasel out of admitting you made an erroneous statement.
Having a Windows only statement means the point #1 is not done and not
available for all platforms. Your
On 2012-03-14 2:54 AM Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/14/12 12:48 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
I thought the discussion several months ago decided on Apache OpenOffice
for both the project and application. If that is correct, when are you
going to change the name of the application?
The full change
On 2012-03-13 2:05 PM Rob Weir wrote:
We are in our final weeks of testing
and bug fixing for our OpenOffice 3.4 release.
I thought the product name was changed to Apache OpenOffice. Shouldn't the release be Apache
OpenOffice 3.4?
Or are you going to use OpenOffice.org 3.4? Or, as you
On 2012-03-13 2:28 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-13 2:05 PM Rob Weir wrote:
We are in our final weeks of testing
and bug fixing for our OpenOffice 3.4 release.
I thought the product name was changed to Apache
On 2012-03-13 2:55 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-13 2:28 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2012-03-13 2:05 PM Rob Weir wrote:
We are in our final
On 2012-03-13 3:33 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
None of which answer my question. Shouldn't the release be Apache
OpenOffice 3.4?
The wiki page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Current+Status+FAQ
states:
On 2012-03-13 3:38 PM Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi *,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:15:29PM +0100, eric b wrote:
Hi,
Could we remove the LibreOffice link from the main page ? (e.g. just
put the name of the derivated software) ?
(
On 2012-03-13 6:25 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Of course, I'm pretty sure this FAQ thing is all just a berserker
tactic, intending to distract us from productive work. We've seen it
before; we'll see it again. Some of us will even learn.
If you want to do productive work, quit making these insulting
On 2012-03-13 7:37 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
Larry, I've seen you on the user lists answering questions. Are there any that
you think should be added to this FAQ?
Where can I get support?
forum – http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/index.php
mailing list – ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org
On 2012-03-13 8:53 PM Simon Phipps wrote:
On 14 Mar 2012, at 02:36, Rob Weir wrote:
Let's see if anyone else thinks this is too verbose. Remember, FAQ's
are not intended to be read as an article, one after another.
Typically they are things we we link to and point users to for
specific
On 2012-03-13 10:43 PM Rob Weir wrote:
I disagree entirely. Simon was the one apply the blunt instrument
here. He started the day by posting on Google+:
Since there is no currently maintained version of OpenOffice.org
following Oracle disbanding the team, and since the new Apache
OpenOffice
On 2012-03-05 12:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If there is no solution for extensions, Apache OpenOffice 3.4 early incubator
releases should not overload prior versions of OO.o. I recommend that AOO 3.4
install in
On 2012-03-05 1:44 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Again, your opinion carries as far as your willingness to code an
alternative install approach.
Are you saying that unless one is willing to provide code there is no point in making
suggestions? I am getting sick of this insulting attitude that is way
On 2012-03-05 1:52 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 12:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.orgwrote:
If there is no solution for extensions, Apache
On 2012-03-05 2:29 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 1:44 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Again, your opinion carries as far as your willingness to code an
alternative install approach.
Are you saying that unless one is willing
On 2012-03-05 3:30 PM Rob Weir wrote:
I'll put it to you quickly simple. If you have been paying attention
you will realize that we're discussing release blocking issues.
I have been paying attention. Have you?
In the thread Calling all volunteers: It is time to test you wrote
We could
On 2012-03-05 4:38 PM Rob Weir wrote:
This has been known for several months and has been part of the 3.4 plan. We discussed it
extensively in early December. Certainly if you have new information, new workarounds, new
proposals, or even new code, then I'm new we all would love to know about
On 2012-03-05 7:11 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Actually, there are grve misunderstandings here, both procedural and
technical., Some have taken the fact that the extensions need to be
reinstalled and extrapolated that as evidence that the profiles are
overwritten.
I have never said that profiles are
On 2012-03-05 7:17 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 4:38 PM Rob Weir wrote:
This has been known for several months and has been part of the 3.4 plan.
We discussed it extensively in early December. Certainly if you
On 2012-03-05 7:51 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
I have never said that profiles are overwritten. I said that the extensions
were deleted from the user profile. Please read what has been written before
accusing people of grave
On 2012-03-05 8:17 PM Rob Weir wrote:
As I said before, the point was that requiring users to reinstall
extensions is not unreasonable. It is certainly better than what you
are recommending, that users must reinstall extensions but then they
also lose every other setting and preference they
On 2012-03-03 12:13 PM Kay Schenk wrote:
Hello all--
I run Linux and know how to avoid overwrites with our current test
packaging by using the --prefix option when I do an RPM install. And this
is what I used for the test I recently did.
Are there similar options available for Mac and Win
On 2012-02-29 8:18 AM Rob Weir wrote:
Once you have installed, launch OpenOffice and look at the Help/About
box. If the revision shown there matches the build you installed
(e..g, r1293550) then the install was a success. Please send a short
note to theooo-...@incubator.apache.org telling us
On 2012-02-29 1:29 PM Rob Weir wrote:
We dealt with the mailing lists before, sending notes to the active
ones that the project had moved over to Apache and gave them the new
addresses. I subscribe to many of these lists and they have been
silent for months. I moderate one and it is all spam,
On 2012-02-14 10:01 AM Manfred Schmidt wrote:
This address does not work: server does not respond
http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/de/3.2.0/OOo_3.2.0_MacOS_PPC_install_de.dmg
Thank you
You can get OOo 3.2 at
On 2012-02-14 2:35 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
IMHO Manfred tried to get the PPC version, so this link is working:
http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/openoffice/localized/de/3.2.0/OOo_3.2.0_MacOS_PPC_install_de.dmg
Newer versions as 3.2.0 are not available.
Marcus
My apologies. My eyes must have been
On 2012-01-18 4:50 AM WilfriedBiesinger wrote concerning Fw2 [ooo-site] - dwnld-size
Mac-version 200MB for 56k-modem or ISDN:
Found out by myself:
german latest version does not exist. So from this: no such file or
directory: the without Java -version.
Which of the Mac-version I have to
On 2012-01-17 5:31 AM WilfriedBiesinger wrote concerning Fw1 [ooo-site] - dwnld-size
Mac-version 200MB for 56k-modem or ISDN:
please, I do need the Mac-version (PPC I think) zipped, too, and although
without Java, if not already is without.
Go to
On 2012-01-17 10:13 AM Christian Lohmaier wrote:
That's a not really helpful answer.
And what is not helpful about it? It provides the location to get the latest official release
for either Intel or PPC versions once the posters determines which he needs.
--
On 2011-12-12 2:04 PM Paul wrote:
I'm the moderator for the old OOo lists (sympa infrastructure) and nothing has come through,
for moderation, for several days (including today) apart from 3 spam (which is far from the
normal 100-150). Think it is still well and truly broken. /paul
I sent a
On 2011-11-09 9:47 PM Donald Harbison wrote:
b) Apache OpenOffice
+1
--
_
Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com
An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. -
Edgard Varese
+1
On 2011-10-18 10:27 AM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
In reply to this message onooo-...@incubator.apache.org, vote for the
acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org
Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling. The Proposal text is at the
October 12
On 2011-09-06 8:04 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
On 09/04/2011 02:23 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
If you do not own the hardware, the domain name and the trademark, then you are operating
at the pleasure of those who do own these
On 2011-09-05 11:26 AM Rob Weir wrote:
If you want to create a support forum outside of the Apache project
then you do not need the approval of the PPMC. I don't see that
outcome as at all tragic. We already have one independent forum. I
see no reason why there cannot be two or more. I don't
Will this list also be available using Gmane?
On 2011-09-02 11:03 AM Rob Weir wrote:
Please note that, as part of the overall migration to Apache, this
list will be closed. Based on feedback received, including from
participants on this list, we've decided to create a users list at the
Apache
On 2011-09-02 12:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a long list of Apache mailing lists available through Gmane. The
mangled subject lines are the result of a choice made when this list was set
up on Gmane and that
On 2011-09-02 12:16 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Donald Whytockdwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Christian Grobmeiergrobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you really want to discuss a users behavior in public?
Wow, I really don't want to do that. I
On 2011-09-02 12:28 PM Rob Weir wrote:
I meant, what is required to get ooo-users on Gmane. Does this
require anything from the ooo-users moderators, or can this be done by
you, since this is a public mailing list that anyone can subscribe to,
It is probably best done by a contributor to this
On 2011-09-02 1:14 PM Tony Stevenson wrote:
On 2 Sep 2011, at 20:00, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Their subscribe page http://gmane.org/subscribe.php also states Please do not
subscribe lists that don't want to be carried by Gmane. That has not been decided
by this project yet.
Well, if no one
On 2011-08-31 1:09 PM Rob Weir wrote:
ooo-users, the future home ofus...@openoffice.org
Like the existing list, it would not be exclusively support. It would
be used for discussions, new feature ideas, etc., whatever users want
to post (within reason).
We can't prevent users from posting
On 2011-08-24 11:42 AM Michael Stahl wrote:
On 23.08.2011 21:25, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
How about the mangling of the To address? When I get one of these, I
cannot use any rules because the To address that my mail client sees
is not that of ooo-dev but some hacked-up pseudo gmane address.
On 2011-08-23 3:37 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Does it matter? The English list is getting very little traffic.
There were 56 posts to us...@openoffice.org in the last week. Traffic is highest after a new
release. Here is a list by month for 2011: Jan 409Feb 290Mar 366Apr 197May
218
On 2011-08-23 4:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
I assume this is a natural tenancy and explains
why OOo has several hundred mailing lists, most of them rarely or
never used.
Most of those are not support lists and that number has nothing to do with this discussion of
support mailing lists.
Do you
On 2011-08-23 4:21 PM Rob Weir wrote:
So the English support forum has 613 *active threads* for August
alone. In many cases that multiplies out to multiple posts per
thread. So the forum traffic dwarfs the mailing list traffic.
Perhaps you should compare to the LibreOffice user support list
On 2011-08-23 7:28 PM Andy Brown wrote:
The OOo user and discuss list use to have the Delivered-to contain moderator and it was
easy to see when a message was from a person that was not subscribed to the list, the way
that Apache does it. When the mail system changed that was removed so the
On 2011-08-22 5:09 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/23/2011 12:50 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access)
On 2011-08-22 7:29 PM Andy Brown wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
There is no link to it anymore on the OOo support or mailing list pages.
How are current users of OOo supposed to find support if the support
lists are no longer listed. Certainly not by posting to this list!
Larry, the link
On 2011-08-22 8:25 PM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
And why should we accept newsgroup posts the same as posts from subscribers to
this list? This list is not a newsgroup, but the gmane newsgroup creates the
effect of subscribers without they're being subscribed here.
Do some research. Read
On 2011-08-22 9:44 PM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Reply all doesn't do what you think on this list.
Yes it does. Actions of reply-all also depend on the email client you are using.
If I had used reply-all for this post, a copy would have been posted through gmane, another
would have gone
by the fact the subject
line was an email address. I have never seen this happen before after several years of using
gmane to access several OOo mailing list.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gusaas [mailto:larry.gus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 18:09
To: ooo-dev
On 2011/08/03 1:43 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Do you mean this?
deleted spam links /
Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
Marcus
Why are you posting spam links? Both links leave out the final e in openoffice and take me to
spam sites.
Larry
--
_
Larry
On 2011/08/03 2:26 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Sorry, of course I meant these:
http://www.openoffice.org
http://www.openoffice.org/news
I think you knew this. ;-)
Of course. But only after clicking on the previous links which opened a pop up in Safari which
wouldn't go away until I force quit
On 2011/07/23 1:01 PM Malte Timmermann wrote:
On 23.07.2011 07:09, Graham Lauder wrote:
...I suspect that the original reasoning behind the
ODF thing was a corporate strategy to wave OOo as the primary
application for producing compliant ODF documents. The trend,
especially in Europe, was
94 matches
Mail list logo
