Re: [DISCUSS] IDE, comment translation, debugging, documentation and other development issues

2012-10-31 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Damjan; > > From: Damjan Jovanovic ... >Hi > >AOO is by far the biggest and most complex code I have ever hacked on, >and I have many questions... > It is indeed big and hairy. I have only done rather simple tasks like updating modules. > >Searching with grep

Re: [APEU2012] Schedule on 11/5

2012-10-30 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello guys/gals; > > From: Jürgen Schmidt  > >On 10/26/12 7:25 PM, imacat wrote: >> Dear all, >> >>     I will arrive Hotel Sinsheim at noon, 11/5.  You may find me in the >> afternoon, 11/5, if you want to discuss with me about forum, wiki or >> anything.  We do

Re: crash with debug build of r1403340

2012-10-29 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - > > FWIW, > > I am getting this with today's build: > > /usr/local/openoffice-r1403590/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so: > > Undefined symbol "_ZThn448_N3svt11OWizardPage14initializePageEv" >  This is probably caused by using a dirt

Re: crash with debug build of r1403340

2012-10-29 Thread Pedro Giffuni
FWIW, I am getting this with today's build: /usr/local/openoffice-r1403590/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so: Undefined symbol "_ZThn448_N3svt11OWizardPage14initializePageEv" cheers, Pedro. - Original Message - > From: Regina Henschel > To: Apache OpenO

Re: [SOURCE]: code repo move after graduation

2012-10-24 Thread Pedro Giffuni
+1 openoffice Ditto for bugzilla. Pedro. ps. FWIW, it would've been nice to attempt to rescue the history and put it under the carpet (even just the SVN stuff was useful) but it's a lot more work than anyone would care to do at this point. - Original Message - > From: imacat > Subject

Re: Call for papers: ApacheCon North America, Portland, Feb 2013

2012-10-23 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Andrea; I should mention that those of us that applied for TAC assistance from the ASF for Sinsheim are not eligible for assistance for Portland. This is a general ASF rule, I have no idea if the PMC can/will override this with available funding but it may lead to somewhat reduced presence in

Re: [RELEASE]: propose a new developer snapshot based on revision 1400796

2012-10-22 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Heck! - Original Message - > From: Jürgen Schmidt >> >> In case of an error we have to adapt the revision accordingly. > > ok, I detected the first problem. With the new updated tomcat version > the servlet-api.jar is not delivered correctly and the build breaks > under MacOS and Wind

Re: Dmake binaries ?

2012-10-22 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Andre; > > From: Andre Fischer ... >Subject: Re: Dmake binaries ? > >On 21.10.2012 02:38, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> Hi; >> >> Apparently the Dmake binaries that I made available on the Dmake site don't >>

Re: [ApacheCon] Where you booking the room?

2012-10-22 Thread Pedro Giffuni
I will be in Hotel Bär. Not sure if they are full already but there is information about nearby hotels here: http://www.apachecon.eu/accommodation/ cheers, Pedro. > > From: Raphael Bircher >To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 7:4

Re: Dmake binaries ?

2012-10-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Just to clarify, Dmake builds fine from source. The old win build that was online was unsupported and I have no idea if it ever worked at all. If anyone trustable provides a recent win package I will be glad to carry it. If someone wants to maintain Dmake let me know. Pedro.

Re: Dmake binaries ?

2012-10-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Sab 20/10/12, Rob Weir ha scritto: > > Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Hi Rob; > > > > The binary was something I built on my spare time with > MSVC 9.0 never used. > > I got a report that the windows executable doesn't work > and that it doesn't bu

Re: Dmake binaries ?

2012-10-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
7:48 PM >Subject: Re: Dmake binaries ? > >On Oct 20, 2012, at 8:38 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> Hi; >> >> Apparently the Dmake binaries that I made available on the Dmake site don't >> work. >> >> I think it would save some time, especially

Dmake binaries ?

2012-10-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; Apparently the Dmake binaries that I made available on the Dmake site don't work. I think it would save some time, especially for Windows users to have a binary installable package. Perhaps some would like to provide one? best regards, Pedro.

Re: Bitmap resampling in symphony? review for i121233)

2012-10-19 Thread Pedro Giffuni
nce GUO > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Pedro Giffuni > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 9:24 PM > Subject: Re: Bitmap resampling in symphony? review for i121233) > > HI~ Pedro, > The Symphony's code was there quite a long time ago. > We need some time to

Re: OpenOffice graduation: translations of press release

2012-10-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Fernando; Both changes you propose are correct. Unfortunately there are also some other terms (escalada, germen) that just dont fit well and some even that I hadnt heard before (director de liberaciones). Its not Juan Carlos' fault though ... some terms can be OK on some countries and sound

Re: Apache OO General Questions

2012-10-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Just IMHO; - Original Message - > From: Alexandro Colorado ... >> >> Then what I'd like to say, speaking from my personal point of view of >> course, is that we could make millions of users happier by sharing >> bugfixes (not necessarily features). > Sharing bugfixes would be indeed

Bitmap resampling in symphony? review for i121233)

2012-10-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; Thanks to Tomaž Vajngerl we now have lanczos and bicubic resampling for bitmaps. Looking at similar code in the symphony: symphony/trunk/main/vcl/inc/vcl/bitmap.hxx (line 54) ...  #define BMP_SCALE_SUPER 0x0004UL ... Which would be in (minor) conflict with the change in

Re: Open Office on IOS ?

2012-10-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; Supporting the cloud doesn't mean you have to use it always. BTW, this extension could receive some tender care: http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/MultiCloud cheers, Pedro. > > From: Larry Gusaas >To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Thurs

Re: Build fails in main/drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d.cxx

2012-10-16 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - > From: Damjan Jovanovic ... > > Hi > > With the latest SVN, on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64, I am getting this error > when building: > > [ build CXX ] drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d > /path/to/AOO/main/drawinglayer/source/texture/texture3d.cxx: In member > function

Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/

2012-10-15 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - > From: Andre Fischer ... >> One thing to think about is if we should remove the category A tarballs > too. > > I thought about that, too, and I think we should. > >> At least when updating boost I decided not to upload it because it's >> rather big. Plus I thi

Re: Apache OO General Questions

2012-10-14 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Dom 14/10/12, Eike Rathke ha scritto: > Hi Pedro, > > On Saturday, 2012-10-13 18:07:24 -0700, Pedro Giffuni > wrote: > > > This said, the latest versions of LO introduce bugs > > that I can't > > reproduce on AOO. AOO is very stable and we want t

Re: Apache OO General Questions

2012-10-13 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Andrew; - Original Message - ... > > Couple of questions: > > (Q) it was stated to me at one time that integrating changes between AOO and > LO > would not be overly complicated (bad memory, but maybe it was Tom Davis > referencing the fact that Symphony was kept in sync with OOo)

Re: Ipad application

2012-10-13 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Wayne; I am not aware of anyone working with us on an iOS port. The IBM Lotus Symphony Viewer will work for read-only purposes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ibm-lotus-symphony-viewer/id482597218?mt=8 And there's also RollApp: https://www.rollapp.com/OpenOffice cheers, Pedro. - O

Re: Graduation timeline: A reminder for project members, press and list observers

2012-10-13 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - > From: Rob Weir ... >> >> As a minor update, the only observation we received so far (besides a >> substantial number of +1 votes, no abstentions or -1) was that almost all >> the proposed PMC members do not belong to other Apache projects; our > mentors >>

Re: There is an "orb logo with gulls" on openSUSE installer

2012-10-12 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Ricardo; - Original Message - > From: RGB ES ... > > 2012/10/12 Dave Fisher > >> >> On Oct 12, 2012, at 9:45 AM, RGB ES wrote: >> >> > Yesterday I upgraded my system to openSUSE 12.2. The installer, when >> > copying packages to the hard drive offer a slide show to highlight t

Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/

2012-10-12 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Thank you Andre! - Original Message - > From: Andre Fischer > To: Andre Fischer > Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 10:25 AM > Subject: Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/ > > On 10.10.2012 11:12, Andre Fischer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was reminded by posts in

Re: Installation patches

2012-10-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Herbert; > > From: Herbert Dürr > >Hi Pedro, > >> The ability to sidestep archive creation would be welcome (I think). > >That is already possible using the configure option >  --with-package-format="installed" >which avoids the archive creation. > I have to

Re: commit after review vs lazy consensus (was Re: [DISCUSS]: next step towards graduation)

2012-10-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
012 23:45, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>>> From: Rob Weir >>>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: W

Re: Installation patches

2012-10-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - ... >> >> That is already done in the background. Before any archive, installer or >> packages are created AOO is setup in a temporary directory. The >> following diff prevents the temporary directory from being deleted >> before "make install: ends: >> [...]

commit after review vs lazy consensus (was Re: [DISCUSS]: next step towards graduation)

2012-10-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - > From: Rob Weir > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:05 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: next step towards graduation > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> >> &

Re: Problem installing openoffice.org-3

2012-10-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; - Original Message - > From: gringo lupo > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org ... >> > >> > drawinglayer deliver >> > >> > 1 module(s): >> >    connectivity >> > need(s) to be rebuilt >> > >> > Reason(s): >> > >> > ERROR: error 65280 oc

Re: [DISCUSS]: next step towards graduation

2012-10-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - ...  >> >> Who "praised" my axe? I recall *you* threatened to veto it :-P. > > Yes, I did.  And I've learned from my error.  So in this case I'd seek > lazy consensus first ;-) > >> And now that you bring back the issue, I still think the cat-B files have >> t

Re: Installation patches

2012-10-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
> > From: Andre Fischer ... > >>   We also don't need EPM to generate tar files. >Should not be too hard to make EPM an optional perquisite when no RPMs or DEBs >are created.  Maybe this already works? > We tried that (with Maho), but it doesn't work. EPM is alwa

Re: [DISCUSS]: next step towards graduation

2012-10-09 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; - Original Message - > From: Rob Weir  ... > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: >> I'm sorry, Rob.  Those files are toxic *for me*.  I can't touch > them in their present state.  I also don't want to read them in their > present state until the prove

Re: Installation patches

2012-10-09 Thread Pedro Giffuni
From: Andre Fischer ... > >>   As you can imagine generating packages takes a lot of time: it involves >>extracting and repackaging.: it would be nice to have a "raw" mode that just >>installs things and let our ports/packaging system take over. > >I am not sure what you mean. > I meant that wo

Re: Installation patches

2012-10-09 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Andre; This initiative is hugely important. Thanks for working on it. > From: Andre Fischer ... > >Hi, > >In the last days I looked into how to create installation patches for updating >AOO.  Using patches instead of full installation packages would lead to >smaller files to distribute for

Re: [Call-for-Review]Bug 121178 - [From Symphoy]Chart name in Excel is different with the name in Symphony

2012-10-09 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Mar 9/10/12, Clarence GUO ha scritto: > Da: Clarence GUO > Oggetto: [Call-for-Review]Bug 121178 - [From Symphoy]Chart name in Excel is > different with the name in Symphony > A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Data: Martedì 9 ottobre 2012, 03:19 > Hi~ > I have a code review request. Is the

Re: [Proposal]Propose to Improve the Graphic Bullets Interoperability with MS Word Binary Format

2012-10-08 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; --- Lun 8/10/12, chengjh ha scritto: > Data: Lunedì 8 ottobre 2012, 20:21 > I have delivered the patch > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=79748&action=diff > to > improve the graphic bullet interoperability with MS Word > binary document. > Can any expert help the code revi

Re: [Proposal]Propose to Improve the Graphic Bullets Interoperability with MS Word Binary Format

2012-10-08 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; --- Lun 8/10/12, chengjh ha scritto: > Data: Lunedì 8 ottobre 2012, 20:21 > I have delivered the patch > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=79748&action=diff > to > improve the graphic bullet interoperability with MS Word > binary document. > Can any expert help the code revi

Re: OpenOffice SVG vector graphics

2012-10-06 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - ... >> >> License? >> >> > Not really sure how it apply here since is a derivative work but all 3 > fonts are OFL > OK, that's acceptable. but perhaps you should try Adobe's SourceSansPro? http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/2012/08/source-sans-pro.html  Just

Re: OpenOffice SVG vector graphics

2012-10-06 Thread Pedro Giffuni
> > From: Alexandro Colorado ... > >On 10/6/12, Graham Lauder wrote: >... >> >> With all of the Bitstream fonts (DejaVu, and Liberation are just variations >> on >> the original Bitstream) compressing the font results in the character >> looking >> top heavy with

Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system

2012-10-05 Thread Pedro Giffuni
ke and AOO build system >> >>I'll checkin the code this week - was trying to get a working env with he >>branch, and was having the usual issues. >>Don't know how far we're taking this , but would be nice to leave the build >>cleaner and more stable... &

Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system

2012-10-05 Thread Pedro Giffuni
CODE] gmake and AOO build system > >I'll checkin the code this week - was trying to get a working env with he >branch, and was having the usual issues. >Don't know how far we're taking this , but would be nice to leave the build >cleaner and more stable... > >A &

Proposal to have Beanshell as an Apache incubation project

2012-10-05 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello guys; Partly motivated by the experience in this project we have discussed with the Beanshell authors the idea of creating a new podling for Apache Beanshell. This new project would be sponsored by the Apache Commons project. We are hoping this project will not be as complex but will be equ

Re: [BUILD] downloading of resources during bootstrap

2012-10-02 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Andrew;   We agreed to completely drop the Category- B tarballs from SVN before graduation. We haven't really done it yet but additionaly removing the Category-A was planned in order to comply with infra's policy.   When updating components I have, in general, stopped uploading the src tarbal

Re: [VOTE] [PMC] Starting Membership for Apache OpenOffice PMC

2012-10-01 Thread Pedro Giffuni
er (wave) >      Donald Harbison (dpharbison) >      Drew Jensen (atjensen) >      Ian Lynch (ingotian) >      Jürgen Schmidt (jsc) >      Kay Schenk (kschenk) >      Kazunari Hirano (khirano) >      Louis Suarez-Potts (louis) >      Marcus Lange (marcus) >     

Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system

2012-09-30 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Ariel; - Original Message - > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile > > Hi Pedro, > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:07:03AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> There is currently nothing here, in fact trunk is more up to date. >> Can I start committing stuff or sho

Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system

2012-09-30 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - ... > I have created a branch called "buildsys".  Run > >     svn  co  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/branches/buildsys  > buildsys > > to obtain your local copy. > There is currently nothing here, in fact trunk is more up to date. Can I star

Re: [DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed PMC Chair

2012-09-28 Thread Pedro Giffuni
so like to nominate >       Donald Harbison (dpharbison) >       Louis Suarez-Potts (louis) >       Pedro Giffuni (pfg) > as candidates of the PMC Chair. > > They are all well known in the community. > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Andrew Rist > wrote: >> I w

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

2012-09-27 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- Ven 28/9/12, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann ha scritto: > Da: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann . > >> > > > > Actually, the key definition is here: > > > > http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/Current%20(trunk)/solenv/inc/settings.mk#894 > > > > We already ignore USE_STLP_DEBUG for OS2. Should

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

2012-09-27 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Answering to myself ... - Original Message - > From: Pedro Giffuni  ... > > Hi Ariel; > >> From: Ariel Constenla-Haile > >> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>>   The big question here, at least for me, is

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

2012-09-27 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Ariel; > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> The big question here, at least for me, is why a boost update causes >> trouble to stlport and why it only affects Windows. > > Google lead me t

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

2012-09-27 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Oliver; - Original Message - ... > > I can confirm that an PRO build (_not_ using configure option > --enable-dbgutil) > with DEBUG=yes breaks in module sw. > To fix this build breaker you need to add link library stl into library swd - > a > similar change as the one which Armin

Re: build svtools with debug

2012-09-27 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Ariel and others, > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile ... > > The solution provided by Oliver removed the header, and the use of the > boost smart pointer with it, it helped to go on with the build, just > like Armin's solution; but the build still breaks in sw in a PRO build > with DEBUG=yes. So th

Re: [proposed PMC] call for feedback: Are you willing to serve as a PMC member?

2012-09-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
>>     Ian Lynch (ingotian) >>     Jürgen Schmidt (jsc) >>     Kay Schenk (kschenk) >>     Kazunari Hirano (khirano) >>     Louis Suarez-Potts (louis) >>     Marcus Lange (marcus) >>     Oliver-Rainer Wittmann (orw) >>     Pedro Giffuni (pfg) Yes

Workflow (was Re: build svtools with debug)

2012-09-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Juergen; Oh.. I am not feeling any of this as a personal attack, email doesn't really represent what one thinks or how one feels about things.. It will be interesting to meet you in Germany... I suspect we are not very different ;). > > From: Juergen Schmid

Re: build svtools with debug

2012-09-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
> From: Armin Le Grand ... > > I builded a lot of other modules in this working copy with debug=t, all > worked well except svtools... > > The question is how long will we be able to live with not being able to > debug in svtools on windows? Not a good situation... > > I just found out that

Re: build svtools with debug

2012-09-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Juergen; - Original Message - ... >> >> The boost update is/was necessary: Linux/BSD builds are using the >> system boost (usually more updated than the one we currently have) >> and that means we can't detect if something doesn't work until > it's too >> late. The real reason for

Re: build svtools with debug

2012-09-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Juergen; - Original Message - > From: Jürgen Schmidt ... > > I don't really share your view here and having Windows not buildable > with debug is a clear no go for me. > You seems to be interested in updating the boost library (which is good) > but not interested to solve the upcoming

Re: build svtools with debug

2012-09-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
> From: Rob Weir ... >> I am afraid that if we revert the boost update we will never get the issues > fixed and >> perhaps this is the motivation we need to resolve the stlport situation. >> >> The stlport situation is basically that we are using 3 outdated versions > and it >> doesn't su

Re: build svtools with debug

2012-09-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
> > From: Rob Weir ... > >On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> >>> From: Armin Le Grand >> ... >>> >>>Hi List, >>> >>>with current trunk I cannot build svtools with debu

Re: build svtools with debug

2012-09-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
> From: Armin Le Grand ... > >Hi List, > >with current trunk I cannot build svtools with debug, e.g. > >cd svtools >make clean >make clean debug=t >make -sr -j8 debug=t > >-> Lots of unresolved externals from stl. Yes, I'm using stlport, and I'm on >windows. > >I tried to also build stlport with

[code][cft] Raptor update

2012-09-25 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; I spent some time updating Raptor1 which was badly outdated and this new patch should work well on all platforms: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121083 FWIW, adapting newer versions of the redland support to use the AOO buildsystem is rather painful so I think this is the

Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system

2012-09-25 Thread Pedro Giffuni
+1 Specially since this code is orphaned and no one will be taking responsibility for fixing breakage. > > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile >To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 8:21 AM >Subject: Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system >

Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system

2012-09-24 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Welcome back Andre; - Original Message - > > On 09/19/2012 09:58 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> Hi Andrew; >> >> >> - Original Message - >> ... >>> I have been provided patches necessary to apply the following CWSes to > AOO &g

Re: [BUILD] New external dependency on Windows: msvcr100.dll

2012-09-21 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Just curious here... Is there something stopping us from building OpenOffice with MSVC 10? Part of motivation for updating some of the dependencies we have is precisely to build on modern compilers. Pedro. - Original Message - > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apac

Re: vigra broken

2012-09-21 Thread Pedro Giffuni
FWIW; I think you caught an intermediate patch that was not complete/correct. Please do report if the problem persists after  r1388355. Pedro. - Original Message - > From: ZuoJun Chen > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Pedro Giffuni > Cc: > Sent: Friday, September 21,

Re: vigra broken

2012-09-21 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; It should be fixed in r1388355. It is/was rather tricky, should have affected only 32 bit platforms. Pedro. - Original Message - > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 5:12 AM > Subject: Re: vigra broken > > On

Re: vigra broken

2012-09-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Got it thanks... (should only happen on Windows, I think)  I am fixing. Pedro. - Original Message - > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:43 PM > Subject: vigra broken > > Hi, > > as the subject says, vigra i

Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native

2012-09-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
> > >On 19.09.2012 20:00, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: >>>> >>>> On 19.09.2012 08:44, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: >>>>>  Hi, >>>>> >>>>>  On 19.09.2012 04:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>>>>>  Hi

Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system

2012-09-19 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Andrew; - Original Message - ... > > I have been provided patches necessary to apply the following CWSes to AOO > trunk: > >   ause131 >   ause130 >   writerfilter10 >   gnumake4 >   sd2gbuild > > As I understand it this is mostly gbuild stuff that we did not want to apply >

Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native

2012-09-19 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi, > > On 19.09.2012 08:44, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 19.09.2012 04:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>> Hi again; >>> >>> I tried something in revision 1387438: basically I preserved some >>> configuration change

Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native

2012-09-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi again; I tried something in revision 1387438: basically I preserved some configuration changes from the previous patchset. Hope that helps, Pedro. - Original Message - > From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 12:40

Re: [OT] Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native

2012-09-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - > Subject: [OT] Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native > > Hi Pedro, > > On 18.09.2012 21:34, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> >> Hi Oliver, * >> >>> >> ... >

Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native

2012-09-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Oliver, * > ... >BTW, I had seen a couple of warnings on the build of module stlport saying >something like "duplicate symbol/declaration/? ignored". Thus, may be >something >in stlport is triggering with issue. > stlport is something that I have been deba

Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native

2012-09-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Oliver; > >Hi, > >I am building trunk, rev. 1386983 on Windows in my environment and I got a >build breaker in module setup_native. >The build breaks in >/main/setup_native/source/win32/customactions/shellextensions - below you find >my error output. > >It looks like that the combination of

Re: do we need openoffice-3-rc port for FreeBSD?

2012-09-17 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - > > Hi Pedro and * > > As branche AOO340 for Apache OpenOffice exists, so do we need > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-RC > again? we need it for smooth integration for 3.4.2 etc. > Still I'm delaying because difference between 3.4.1 and 3.4.0 > (in terms of buildin

Re: [DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed PMC List

2012-09-17 Thread Pedro Giffuni
ote: > >> >> Andre Fischer (af) >> Andrea Pescetti (pescetti) >> Drew Jensen (atjensen) >> Jürgen Schmidt (jsc) >> Kay Schenk (kschenk) >> Raphael Bircher (rbircher) >> Pedro Giffuni (pfg) >> Yang Shih-Ching (imacat) >> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann (orw) >> RGB.ES (rgb-es) >> >> > > >

Re: [PMC] Proposed PMC List

2012-09-17 Thread Pedro Giffuni
t;Andrea Pescetti (pescetti) >Drew Jensen (atjensen) >Jürgen Schmidt (jsc) >Kay Schenk (kschenk) >Raphael Bircher (rbircher) >Pedro Giffuni (pfg) >Yang Shih-Ching (imacat) >Oliver-Rainer Wittmann (orw) >RGB.ES (rgb-es) > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed PMC List

2012-09-17 Thread Pedro Giffuni
t; willing to workon it.  Hell you didn't even include >> yourself in the list ;-). >> >> >> >> >>> >>> From: Andrew Rist >>> To: ooo-dev >>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 2:13 PM >>&

Re: [CFT] Boost update

2012-09-16 Thread Pedro Giffuni
available in ooo-extras site and the build process doesa great job grabbing the tarball from there. Cheers, Pedro. > > From: Pedro Giffuni >To: ooo-dev >Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 9:48 PM >Subject: [CFT] Boost update > >Hi guys

Re: [EXT] MySQL SDBC Connector

2012-09-09 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Ariel; - Original Message - ...  > > Hi Mechtilde, > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:38:42AM +0200, Mechtilde wrote: >> thanks for the good job. >> >> So it is possible to use further the mysql-connector. >> >> Can you also publish the source code for the connector. >> Then other

Re: [EXT] MySQL SDBC Connector

2012-09-06 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Very, very cool!! Thanks Ariel! Pedro. > > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile >To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 8:50 PM >Subject: [EXT] MySQL SDBC Connector > >Hi *, > >I managed to build the MySQL Connector extension and make it w

[CFT] Boost update

2012-09-06 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi guys; I have an update to the system boost based on FreeBSD's port: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120837 New versions of boost are huge but in addition to the usual set of bug fixes this is known to build with clang. This is completely untested in platforms like Windows, Lin

Re: [BUILD] FBSD buildbot

2012-09-05 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello Andrew; Are you aware what you are asking? ;). An alternative would be that we can send you a modified "port Makefile" that fetches the files from SVN and applies the patches, etc, but I guess you will prefer to use a unified buildscript for linux/BSD instead. For our local package we use

Re: Building OpenOffice with Visual Studio 2010

2012-08-28 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; > > From: Herbert Duerr >  >    >On 28.08.2012 11:28, Andre Fischer wrote: >> On 28.08.2012 10:51, Ian Harvey wrote: >>> I have been experimenting with building OpenOffice (trunk) with Visual >>> Studio 2010.  I have made some progress, but clearly more wor

Re: svn commit: r1377482 - /incubator/ooo/trunk/main/external_deps.lst

2012-08-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
BTW, - Original Message - ... >> >> This is already part of the current process. The signatures are in > download_external_dependencies.pl. The Central Maven Repository uses these as > well. >> > > Those are MD5 hashes, not signatures.    MD5 has been broken since 1996: > > http://e

Re: svn commit: r1377482 - /incubator/ooo/trunk/main/external_deps.lst

2012-08-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message - ,,, >> >> Please take the time to study the Maven project before you attempt to > reinvent it. [1] >> > > I think one could fairly look at the relative creation dates and see > that Maven reinvented OpenOffice's dependency tracking system ;-) >  Both are reinv

Re: svn commit: r1377482 - /incubator/ooo/trunk/main/external_deps.lst

2012-08-26 Thread Pedro Giffuni
- Original Message -   > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Dave Fisher > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We need to do more work to have proper compliance with Apache > Infrastructure policy in managing external dependencies. >> >> I may not be precisely correct and am looking for confirmat

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote

2012-08-21 Thread Pedro Giffuni
+1 Apache OpenOffice community is ready to graduate from the Apache Incubator. - Original Message -  > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote > > Rob Weir [robw...@apache.org] kirjoitti: >> Per the IPMC's "Guide to Successful Graduation" [1] this is > the >>

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Dave; - Original Message -  ... >> >> The particular concern of how the "official" packages are >> generated and distributed  is also interesting. At this time >> I would say the FreeBSD port is as legitimate and >> worthy of being tagged "Apache OpenOffice" as the Windows >> pack

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
  - Original Message -   >> >> Marvin's intervention is very far reaching indeed. It pretty much > supports the position >> that there is no such thing as a binary release, and it involves some > issues that have >> to be solved before graduation. >> > > Now I think you are getting

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
  - Original Message -  ... > > Hi Folks, > > We are really getting ahead of ourselves. > I think so too :(. > We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed - > Marvin > asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the official > SOURCE > re

Re: Need to Revisit RAT Excludes and Wildcards

2012-08-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; - Original Message - ...  > > Ditto.  This is our code, the source is there, with Apache headers. > The pre-built JAR at worst is redundant.  I don't see a policy issue > here. > >> ./stax/download/README_stax-1.2.0.jar > > Need to ask Pedro about that one: > http://svnsearch.org/

Re: What to say in AOO 3.4.1 release announcement about the ports? (BSD, Solaris, OS/2)?

2012-08-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
2 02:12 AM, schrieb Rob > Weir: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:37 PM, > drew >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>

Re: [VOTE][preliminary RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating), RC2

2012-08-18 Thread Pedro Giffuni
ugh... too late to offer my +1 but Well done team.. thanks for having all those bugs fixed !! Pedro. - Original Message - > From: Andre Fischer > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 7:11 AM > Subject: [VOTE][preliminary RESULT] Release Apache Open

Re: svn commit: r1367858 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main/pyuno/source/module: pyuno.cxx pyuno_callable.cxx pyuno_module.cxx pyuno_runtime.cxx

2012-08-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
. > > From: Pavel Janík >To: Pedro Giffuni >Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 12:45 AM >Subject: Re: R: Re: svn commit: r1367858 - in >/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/pyuno/source/module: pyuno.cxx pyuno_callable.cxx >pyuno_module.cxx pyuno_

R: Re: svn commit: r1367858 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main/pyuno/source/module: pyuno.cxx pyuno_callable.cxx pyuno_module.cxx pyuno_runtime.cxx

2012-08-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Ugh ... Just another thing: perhaps you are using the system python and it happens to be <= 2.5 ? I can add backward compatibility for this case rather easily but sooner or later you may run into trouble as we are preparing for system Python3 and it removed some deprecated functionality. Pedr

Re: svn commit: r1367858 - in /incubator/ooo/trunk/main/pyuno/source/module: pyuno.cxx pyuno_callable.cxx pyuno_module.cxx pyuno_runtime.cxx

2012-08-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello Pavel; Sorry that I just read this ... Can you please share the errror message? I will be a bit busy tomorrow but I will get to it. Pedro.

Re: Adobe source Sans Pro fonts

2012-08-10 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Herbert; > > From: Herbert Duerr >To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 2:52 AM >Subject: Re: Adobe source Sans Pro fonts > >On 09.08.2012 22:55, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> Of course it's too late

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >