How does switching to Linux help here?
- Does any of the Linux installations come with a pre-installed
3D accelerated graphics?
Sabayon Linux. It's gentoo based, stable enough. Has preinstalled
ATI/Nvidia and Intel drivers.
- What happened again if you installed such a driver and tried
Ooo,,,
the installer has
ZFS boot/root support, etc.
Huzzah! Now, I wonder if a Solaris built on built on Sun Studio (such as
SXCE) would live nicely in a distro built on GCC...
*That* would be interesting.
DSL
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
the installer has
ZFS boot/root support, etc.
Huzzah! Now, I wonder if a Solaris built on built on
Sun Studio (such as
SXCE) would live nicely in a distro built on GCC...
*That* would be interesting.
ROTFL. Well running Sun Studio did not seem to be a
problem (except for missing sun
Manish Chakravarty wrote:
How does switching to Linux help here?
- Does any of the Linux installations come with a pre-installed
3D accelerated graphics?
Sabayon Linux. It's gentoo based, stable enough. Has preinstalled
ATI/Nvidia and Intel drivers.
How can they include
Thanks a lot!I gave modload the absolute path to the module like 'modload
/gdx/gdx/test',but I got nothing more than the error.By the way,I am a newer.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Actually there is a hell of a difference. My desktop
is in the global
zone. I would hate to see it stuck in the last
century.
Last century? How much difference would there be for a GUI desktop?
And why use provocative phrases like last century to describe a difference
that not everyone
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia
drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
Heh. Who is going to sue? Linus? Who will he sue?
Linus put a stop to those zealots who wanted to make
sure you would not be able to use a binary driver...I
don't see him going after
Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia
drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
Heh. Who is going to sue? Linus? Who will he sue?
Linus put a stop to those zealots who wanted to make
sure you would not be able to use a
FSF or maybe http://www.gpl-violations.org/. Just
as the Kororaa
LiveCD was forced to stop distributing the
Nvidia/ATI drivers. It
was one of the first GNU/Linux LiveCDs to bundle
Compiz. It
is redistribution in installed form along with a
GPL kernel.
Ah well. The solution?
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Um the drm kernel components of the Intel drivers may or may not
recompile. For eg. was I using Cisco VPN Client on kernel 2.6.9 and
the kernel module gave a compile error after I upgraded to 2.6.11
because of a kernel variable name change.
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
The NVIDIA/ATI drivers work off-the-DVD even when used as a live DVD/
You can play a quake-clone 3D fps shooter, right off the DVD.
Infact the DVD offers a Play Game option right in the
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize the Indiana Project is in the early requirements stage,
nevertheless I think it would be _very_ useful to note the alignment
between where the Indiana
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Actually there is a hell of a difference. My desktop
is in the global
zone. I would hate to see it stuck in the last
century.
Last century? How much difference would there be for a GUI desktop?
And why use provocative phrases like last century to describe a
Doug Scott wrote:
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Actually there is a hell of a difference. My desktop
is in the global zone. I would hate to see it stuck in the last
century.
Last century? How much difference would there be for a GUI desktop?
And why use provocative phrases like last
Ian Collins wrote:
This comment comes from that I have just looked at building Xfce 4.4.1
for the latest Solaris 10.
The libraries for Gnome are that old that to build Xfce you need to
remove Gnome completely and
start from scratch. It is obvious that the Solaris version update time
is a little
Well, Belenix is a project run by a Sun employee. Do you believe it is
not a Sun project?
Well, the homepage is hosted by Blastwave:
http://www.genunix.org/distributions/belenix_site/?q=about
No mention of Sun in the about page.
Personally I didn't think it was a Sun project, just as my
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Brian Gupta wrote:
Well, Belenix is a project run by a Sun employee. Do you believe it is
not a Sun project?
Well, the homepage is hosted by Blastwave:
^^^
No its not. See: http://sol10frominnerspace.blogspot.com/
You might
I saw a posting on Belenix 0.6.x DVD development and
would just like to add:
1. Nevada b65+ recommended
2. JDS Vermillion 65+ (stable, GNOME 2.18.1)
recommended
3. KDE 3.5.6 + Koffice 1.6.2
4. Xorg 7.2 (full port)
5. Compiz 0.5 + Nvidia drivers
6. Better GUI for network and printing
I realize the Indiana Project is in the early requirements stage,
nevertheless I think it would be _very_ useful to note the alignment
between where the Indiana project appears to be headed and the design
goals
of the BeleniX OpenSolaris developer community.
Why should a
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize the Indiana Project is in the early requirements stage,
nevertheless I think it would be _very_ useful to note the alignment
between
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize the Indiana Project is in the early requirements stage,
nevertheless I think it would be _very_ useful to note
Moinak Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
Where do you believe that there is a GPL violatioon?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL
Ananth Shrinivas wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize the Indiana Project is in the early requirements stage,
nevertheless I think it would be _very_ useful to
Moinak Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
Heh. Who is going to sue? Linus? Who will he sue?
...
FSF or maybe http://www.gpl-violations.org/. Just as the Kororaa
The FSF is not able to do this.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353
Manish Chakravarty wrote:
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
The NVIDIA/ATI drivers work off-the-DVD even when used as a live DVD/
You can play a quake-clone 3D fps shooter, right off the DVD.
Infact the DVD offers a
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia
drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
Heh. Who is going to sue? Linus? Who will he sue?
If it were a GPL violation, FSF lawyers would be in touch with the
infringing party.
On 15/05/07, Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia
drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
Heh. Who is going to sue? Linus? Who will he sue?
If it were a GPL violation, FSF lawyers would be in touch with the
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Moinak Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
Where do you believe that there is a GPL violatioon?
This is admittedly a grey area there is a good
Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, Belenix is a project run by a Sun employee. Do you believe it is
not a Sun project?
...
Does it really matter. It is one of two distros that meet the needs of
a community distro. Nexenta being the other. Fully OpenSource, and
very feature rich.
Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia
drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
Heh. Who is going to sue? Linus? Who will he sue?
If it were a GPL violation, FSF lawyers would be in touch with the
infringing
Moinak Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Moinak Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can they include closed-source ATI/Nvidia drivers in a GNU/Linux
LiveDVD without violating the GPL ?
Where do you believe that there is a GPL violatioon?
Moinak Ghosh writes:
This is admittedly a grey area there is a good writeup on this
topic at the Kororaa website after one Linux kernel developer
accused them of violating GPL:
http://kororaa.org/static.php?page=gpl
In any case Nvidia itself explicitly allows
I'd be more worried if I were the author of such a module. I don't
see how you could develop a kernel module for Linux that isn't
considered to be based on the GPLv2 kernel itself and thus forced to
be released as source to anyone who receives the binaries.
If you don't distribute the GPL'ed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be more worried if I were the author of such a module. I don't
see how you could develop a kernel module for Linux that isn't
considered to be based on the GPLv2 kernel itself and thus forced to
be released as source to anyone who receives the binaries.
If you
ken mays wrote:
I saw a posting on Belenix 0.6.x DVD development and
would just like to add:
1. Nevada b65+ recommended
Will be in 0.6.1. 0.6 will be based on B60.
2. JDS Vermillion 65+ (stable, GNOME 2.18.1)
recommended
Yes planned for 0.6.1 DVD.
3. KDE 3.5.6 + Koffice 1.6.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd be more worried if I were the author of such a module. I don't
see how you could develop a kernel module for Linux that isn't
considered to be based on the GPLv2 kernel itself and thus forced to
be released as source to anyone who receives the binaries.
If you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's not the sticky part. The sticky part is making your own code
that is in fact based on a work by someone else that is under GPLv2.
This very much hinges on the fact that based on can be taken to
mean calls interfaces in; untenable.
Actually, it's
That's not the sticky part. The sticky part is making your own code
that is in fact based on a work by someone else that is under GPLv2.
This very much hinges on the fact that based on can be taken to
mean calls interfaces in; untenable.
Secondly, in order to write the code based on the
On 5/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can deal with using 'ksh' for scripting and tcsh interactively;
I cannot deal with ksh or bash as interactive shells. They just
have too much catching up to do.
Does that include the new ksh? Did you report any bugs or feature requests?
Buenas, tengo el siguiente problema:
Un cliente contrató un VPS basado en OpenSolaris. Soy usuario de Linux, desde
hace varios años,... pero no de Solaris, o por lo menos no al nivel necesario
para resolver este problema.
Para la plataforma que estoy necesitando, requiero instalar nginx
Why do you believe this?
From:
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-violation.html
Note that the GPL, and other copyleft licenses, are copyright licenses. This
means that only
the copyright holders are empowered to act against violations. The FSF acts on
all GPL
violations reported on
On 5/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can deal with using 'ksh' for scripting and tcsh interactively;
I cannot deal with ksh or bash as interactive shells. They just
have too much catching up to do.
Does that include the new ksh? Did you report any bugs or feature
Does Opensolaris have mailing list for the Studio compiler (mailing
list, not the dreaded web forum Sun uses for support)?
Bruno
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Linux, there is no documented DDI other than the source code. In
order to write a decent driver for Linux, you *have to* read the Linux
code. In order to do that, you must accept the terms of the GPLv2,
and, as you use the information you learn in
What if someone were to attempt to reverse engineer the kernel
interface for Linux strictly by reading what is available on the web.
(Commentary)
I would pick a popular kernel that has the most commentary. (Don't
look at source though).
You could then document the kernel interface for say 2.4.x
Joerg Schilling writes:
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Linux, there is no documented DDI other than the source code. In
order to write a decent driver for Linux, you *have to* read the Linux
code. In order to do that, you must accept the terms of the GPLv2,
and, as you use
Of course, it matters
SchilliX was already fully Opensource before, so what is special in Belenix?
Moinak managed to convince 5 or 6 friends of his to help out. Belenix
also seems to have reached or almost reached critical mass, as one of
the top two leading non-sun OpenSolaris distros.
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, Belenix is a project run by a Sun employee. Do you believe it is
not a Sun project?
...
Does it really matter. It is one of two distros that meet the needs of
a community distro. Nexenta being the other. Fully OpenSource,
What if someone were to attempt to reverse engineer the kernel
interface for Linux strictly by reading what is available on the web.
(Commentary)
Doable in theory, probably worthless in practice given the kernel
interface churn. No DDI == no reason for stability.
I don't think it is
Brian Gupta writes:
What if someone were to attempt to reverse engineer the kernel
interface for Linux strictly by reading what is available on the web.
(Commentary)
Doable in theory, probably worthless in practice given the kernel
interface churn. No DDI == no reason for
Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, it matters
SchilliX was already fully Opensource before, so what is special in Belenix?
Moinak managed to convince 5 or 6 friends of his to help out. Belenix
also seems to have reached or almost reached critical mass, as one of
the top
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SchilliX was already fully Opensource before, so what is special in Belenix?
When I started with SchilliX, I asked for collaboration but it seems that
this
does not really happens.
but why should there be only one ?
BeleniX appears to have
SchilliX was already fully Opensource before, so what is special in Belenix?
Moinak managed to convince 5 or 6 friends of his to help out. Belenix
also seems to have reached or almost reached critical mass, as one of
the top two leading non-sun OpenSolaris distros. (From a completeness
Well they did not start from scratch but from my experiences. I was the
only
person who did start from scratch.
Maybe on x86 ...
Cheers,
www.martux.org/xorg
Could you tell me what different goals Belenix has?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Could you tell me what different goals Belenix has?
They don't start arguments with everyone who isn't helping
their personal projects progress, and try to derail those
working on other areas.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Well, Belenix is a project run by a Sun employee. Do you believe it is
not a Sun project?
Yes, I believe it is not a Sun project, if, by saying
Sun project, you imply that Sun management made a
decision, allocated resources, or otherwise caused
it to happen. Of course,
With what Edward suggested, I got rid of the ldi_get_size() error by defining
the prop_op entry point appropriately.
However, the zpool create still fails - with zio_wait() returning 22.
bash-3.00# dtrace -n 'fbt::ldi_get_size:entry{self-t=1;}
fbt::ldi_get_size:entry/self-t/{}
Dear all!
We deployed some SIP server application on top of multi-core Sparc machine.
The CPU number is matched with the number of application processes. All
processes are
waiting on the same socket and doing the same thing in a loop: call a
blocking recvfrom
and then process the
Well, in 2005, AFAIK they said they would open source Sunray.
See http://www.save-solaris.org/schwartz-nc05q2-chat.html :
mcerveny (Q): Do you opensource SunRay protocol ?
Glenn Weinberg (A): We intend to open the protocol, yes.
--
Damiano ALBANI
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Lo resolví simple.
Bajé el paquete:
ftp://ftp.sunfreeware.com/pub/freeware/intel/10/pcre-7.1-sol10-x86-local.gz de
SunFreeware y lo compile contra eso.
Por ahora va bien.
Saludos.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well they did not start from scratch but from my experiences. I was the
only
person who did start from scratch.
Maybe on x86 ...
Depends on what you are talking.
There are of course many things needed for sparc that are not in SchilliX,
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Could you tell me what different goals Belenix has?
They don't start arguments with everyone who isn't helping
their personal projects progress, and try to derail those
working on other areas.
???
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL
Brian Gupta wrote:
I proposed in an earlier thread that there I felt there should be two
products/distros developed within OpenSolaris.org.
- OpenSolaris Enterprise Edition (classic Solaris)
- OpenSolaris Community Edition (swiss army knife distro)
This is a simple idea that gets hard rather
Damiano ALBANI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, in 2005, AFAIK they said they would open source Sunray.
See http://www.save-solaris.org/schwartz-nc05q2-chat.html :
mcerveny (Q): Do you opensource SunRay protocol ?
Glenn Weinberg (A): We intend to open the protocol, yes.
Meanwhile Glenn
Bruno Jargot wrote:
Does Opensolaris have mailing list for the Studio compiler (mailing
list, not the dreaded web forum Sun uses for support)?
You might find some help on tools-discuss, but the Studio compiler isn't
really part of the OpenSolaris project, and they seem to like their web
forums
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199500131
This seems more like the answer to the embedded space
question on whether to use the Nevada kernel or
another Sun product. I think the JavaOS model is back
in the picture.
I'd like to see some head-to-head comparisons of
Hello Gentlemans
I received my Opensolaris Kit a couple of days ago and I installed it in a
Compaq nc6000 laptop installation went well but when I try to connect to
internet via wireless I can not.
I open the network tool to configure the wireless in ath0 via DHCP and entered
the information
another Sun product. I think the JavaOS model is back
in the picture.
JavaOS? Don't you mean uCLinux? (Reread the article)
I'd like to see some head-to-head comparisons of the
jPhone versus the iPhone.
Personally I think the jPhone is a non-starter. uCLinux yes, Java maybe not.
brian
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Could you tell me what different goals Belenix has?
They don't start arguments with everyone who isn't helping
their personal projects progress, and try to derail those
working on other areas.
???
Marc Hamilton wrote:
You don't see too many ISVs saying they support Fedora (in comparison to RHEL).
You don't see to many ISV's saying they support any OS with a
6-month release cycle and 1-2 year lifetime when they can choose
a variant of that OS with a 2-3 year release cycle and 5-6 year
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Could you tell me what different goals Belenix has?
They don't start arguments with everyone who isn't helping
their personal projects progress, and try to derail those
working on other areas.
???
Well they did not start from scratch but from my experiences. I was the
only
person who did start from scratch.
Maybe on x86 ...
Cheers,
www.martux.org/xorg
http://www.blastwave.org/dclarke/blog/?q=node/44
I still have martux running here and it runs just fine. There are a LOT of
On 5/15/07, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I started with SchilliX, I asked for collaboration but it seems that this
does not really happens.
I have seen the amount of effort put in by Moinak and other couple of
belenix team members during open source events such as foss.in
Brian Gupta wrote:
another Sun product. I think the JavaOS model is back
in the picture.
JavaOS? Don't you mean uCLinux? (Reread the article)
I'd like to see some head-to-head comparisons of the
jPhone versus the iPhone.
Personally I think the jPhone is a non-starter. uCLinux yes, Java
- OpenSolaris Enterprise Edition (classic Solaris)
- OpenSolaris Community Edition (swiss army knife distro)
This is a simple idea that gets hard rather quickly.
Coming up with a roadmap/plan that describes what is
intended is where we have always run into problems.
Some of these
On 5/15/07, Doug Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Gupta wrote:
another Sun product. I think the JavaOS model is back
in the picture.
JavaOS? Don't you mean uCLinux? (Reread the article)
I'd like to see some head-to-head comparisons of the
jPhone versus the iPhone.
Personally I think
http://www.gnusolaris.org/Download
--
Nexenta Team
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sun developer tools/technologies/platforms Java all use the forum
infrastructure on SDN. We are also hoping to have a full email gateway,
but are using what we have today.
http://forum.java.sun.com/category.jspa?categoryID=113
It has a simple email notification system, watch a topic or
On 15/05/07, Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/15/07, Doug Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Gupta wrote:
another Sun product. I think the JavaOS model is back
in the picture.
JavaOS? Don't you mean uCLinux? (Reread the article)
I'd like to see some head-to-head
Based on the following descriptions, I think that Belenix and Nexenta
are both suitable candidates for providing a basline for developing a
community release of OpenSolaris. It actually depends on how far the
community wishes Indiana to diverge from the current code base.
Thoughts?
brian
Well they did not start from scratch but from my experiences. I was the
only
person who did start from scratch.
Maybe on x86 ...
Cheers,
www.martux.org/xorg
http://www.blastwave.org/dclarke/blog/?q=node/44
I still have martux running here and it runs just fine. There
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Alex Ross wrote:
http://www.gnusolaris.org/Download
alternatively:
http://www.genunix.org/distributions/gnusolaris/index.html
PS: the VMWare image will take a while longer to mirror.
Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice:
I don't consider Taiwan's First International Computer an established vendor.
Also, I think it's going to be a tough sell to the big cell makers.
Considering Linux is opensource, and anyone can use it, why would an
established vendor go with Sun's as opposed to rolling their own?
brian
On
Hi,
I adapted cw to use ccache for sunpro and gcc and it worked quite good.
following are two passes of dmake -k on a onnv checkout as of
yesterday (on an older system, hence some build errors).
while there are some things that must be fixed in ccache (sunpro
handling very likely), see ccache
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Could you tell me what different goals Belenix has?
They don't start arguments with everyone who isn't helping
their personal projects progress, and try
On 5/15/07, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: this is not to you but to Ian, I still would like to know whether
Project Indiana is a glossy paper project or whether is should result
in code.
Glossy paper all the way. I'm just interested in seeing my name in lights.
-ian
--
Ian
With what Edward suggested, I got rid of the ldi_get_size() error by defining
the prop_op entry point appropriately.
However, the zpool create still fails - with zio_wait() returning 22.
bash-3.00# dtrace -n 'fbt::ldi_get_size:entry{self-t=1;}
fbt::ldi_get_size:entry/self-t/{}
Joerg,
You need to take a chill pill, as you are alienating (have alienated?)
the group you are seeking collaboration with. Let me give you a hint.
Most people don't like to have their motives questioned at every move.
Nor do they like contrariness, when it seems to have no logical
purpose.
I'd like to see some head-to-head comparisons of the
jPhone versus the iPhone.
jPhone seems like a word some irrelevant person came up with. There is no such
thing. JavaFX Mobile (http://www.sun.com/software/javafx/mobile/) is a software
product that can be used by anyone to build any kind
solaris 10 11/06 on SUN V240
# cat /etc/dfs/dfstab
share -F nfs -o ro,anon=0 /jumpstart
#svcadm enable svc:/network/nfs/server:default
# svcs -x svc:/network/nfs/server:default
svc:/network/tftp/udp6:default has no restarter property group; ignoring.
svc:/network/nfs/server:default (NFS
I'd like to see some head-to-head comparisons of the
jPhone versus the iPhone.
jPhone seems like a word some irrelevant person came
up with. There
is no such
thing. JavaFX Mobile
(http://www.sun.com/software/javafx/mobile/) is a
software
product that can be used by anyone to build any kind
Have you tried issuing 'svcadm enable -r nfs/server' ?
There may be a dependency lurking somewhere you could have missed.
On 5/15/07, jason jin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
solaris 10 11/06 on SUN V240
# cat /etc/dfs/dfstab
share -F nfs -o ro,anon=0 /jumpstart
#svcadm enable
Good work :)
I tried the A6 Nexenta Update Manager, but it failed saying packages were
broken. Is there a suggested procedure to do a proper upgrade?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On 5/15/07, Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize the Indiana Project is in the early requirements stage,
I am looking for a relatively inexpensive server(s), that can run in
my (family) living room. (IE: That don't sound like jet engine's)
Ideally one of them would be beefy enough to run vmware server on, so
I can have multiple dev environments running concurrently. (If they
are cheap enough I
On 5/14/07, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
Questions for the install community really:
- do we have this sort of verbose and user-friendly descriptions available
for packages?
- would this go into the pkginfo file (I think this would be rather
difficult)?
-
$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade -f
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 14:14 -0700, MC wrote:
Good work :)
I tried the A6 Nexenta Update Manager, but it failed saying packages were
broken. Is there a suggested procedure to do a proper upgrade?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
On 5/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can deal with using 'ksh' for scripting and tcsh interactively;
I cannot deal with ksh or bash as interactive shells. They just
have too much catching up to do.
Does that include the new ksh?
I have a network attached tape device I built using this board from
Tyan. It is a FlexATX so its quite small (only marginally larger than
a mini-itx) and is dead silent (under 17db) in full operation and
makes use of the newer core 2 chipset (vt-x instruction support) so
vmware would run at near
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
On 5/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can deal with using 'ksh' for scripting and tcsh interactively;
I cannot deal with ksh or bash as interactive shells. They just
have too much catching up to do.
Does that include the new ksh?
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
