bug.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
), by adding this to EXTRA_LIBS in
PHP's Makefile:
-liconv -lintl
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
QT/Jambi [http://trolltech.com/products/qt/jambi] on Solaris 10 built
with Sun Studio 11 and QT 4.3.0:
http://www.stefanteleman.org/qtjambi/jambisolaris.jpg
And some patches:
http://www.stefanteleman.org/qtjambi/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish
. i believe that
allowing an experiment is more valuable than disallowing it because of lack of
due process, missing paperwork or filling in the wrong form.
just my 0.02.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, that authority.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
On May 11, 2007 at 1:18 PM UNIX admin wrote:
Dear Sir,
if you need to use the `locate` command to find something, you have
a MUCH bigger problem.
Dude,
This is, SO, like, AWESOME
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:21, Joerg Schilling wrote:
But BTW: dirfd() would be just:
#define dirfd(dp) (dp)-dd_fd
This works really well when (dp) is NULL.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
On Thursday 22 March 2007 12:29, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 10:21, Joerg Schilling wrote:
But BTW: dirfd() would be just:
#define dirfd(dp) (dp)-dd_fd
This works really well when (dp) is NULL.
???
Garbage
EBADF. This would require that it is a
function, not a macro.
getc(NULL) also blows up; what is your point?
My point is that it should not SEGV on NULL pointer. It should
return -1 and set EBADF.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
?
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:23, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The dirfd( ) function may fail if:
[EINVAL] The dirp argument does not refer to a valid directory
stream.
May is not must ;-)
It isn't can't or shouldtn't either.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects
in /usr/apache2.2, thereby preserving the existing /usr/apache2.
However, this alternate location would *not* alter the EOF/EOL timeout announced
for Apache 2.0.x.
What are the community's views on this ?
Thank you.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
binaries [/{usr,opt}/apache2]:
/etc/apache2
/var/apache2
These additional two locations *must* exist.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
files that the vendor - for example, Sun - delivers) and we're
not talking about overwriting the configuration files (the so-called
e files). Is that correct?
Correct. Existing configuration files will *not* be overwritten.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
)
and not, for example, svc:/network/http:apache2.2.
Yes, the svc manifest names will be preserved.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
porting and regression testing, is the possibility described above an acceptable
risk ?
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 02:07, Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007 07:37 pm, Stefan Teleman wrote:
http://www.php-security.org/
This is scary...I think I'll go get a cold shower...;-)
I have to wonder, much of the online forum software is written in
PHP, and as such seems
referes to yours truly. I was using the
Royal We. :-)
Yes, maintaining security patches for PHP is an extremely high maintenance job.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
://ianmurdock.com/2007/03/19/joining-sun/),
and it'll likely be making the rounds soon. Just wanted to
make sure you heard the news directly from me and to introduce myself.
Cool. Very cool.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, that must be tempered
with the requirement of stability and security.
http://www.php-security.org/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
/
--
Stefan Teleman
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 12:04, Darren J Moffat wrote:
what it if it a non code project ? Not all projects should be
required to be code based.
Granted, but i'm assuming that 6 months from inception, a project
should show some signs of activity of some sort. :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan
-all.html
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
On 2/6/07, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry - I've never used Opera and don't know what it does.
One thing it *doesn't* do is to bloat Xorg to 684MB in 24 hours.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris
Maybe we could enforce some kind of automatic self-destruct timer from
the date of project inception. For example, if a project doesn't
check in any code within 6 months of inception, it self-destructs.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
, and might even steal
momentum from OpenSolaris. And this was done exclusively under CDDL.
What does this have to do with the GPL ?
For the record: Yes, i am a card carrying member of the Free Software
Foundation.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, but ultimately I'd like for
closed bins to disappear completely.
+1.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris
to dual license under GPLv3, with, or without, the CDDL
assembly exception.
the only material downside that i can think of is not to dual-license.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty
::currentItem()
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/opt/qt-3.3.7-32/lib][01/19/2007 9:26:03][86]
c++filt says:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/19/2007 9:29:46][108] c++filt
__1cLQdDTextLayoutLcurrentItem6M_nJQdDTextItem__
__1cLQdDTextLayoutLcurrentItem6M_nJQdDTextItem__
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/19/2007 9:31:05][109]
--Stefan
--
Stefan
place.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thursday 18 January 2007 19:02, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote: (MB)
Stefan Teleman wrote: (ST)
STAt most, you can say that the intersection between KDE e.V. and
STOpenSolaris is not the Null Set, since it contains at least one
known STelement. :-)
ST
ST--Stefan
. That IMHO would be worth having in
OpenSolaris (plus the starting point for the KDE 3.5.x work can be
KDE 3.4.x, while KDE4 is completely new).
Otherwise, no objections here.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 12:24, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2084284,00.asp?kc=EWEWEMNL0115
07EP28A
( Sun to License OpenSolaris Under GPLv3)
+1.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V
am questioning the Blindly trying to follow
Linux statement, given Mr. Torvalds' publicly expressed views on
GPLv3.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:56, John Sonnenschein wrote:
Following the official proposal guidelines, I'd like to take this
opportunity to propose that we collaborate with the KDE e.V. and
kde-core-devel in order to integrate KDE as an OpenSolaris project
+1.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
a KDE Project at OpenSolaris,
pursuant to the OpenSolaris Project Proposal Guidelines. These
Project Guidelines are completely independent from the KDE e.V., or
from KDE Solaris.
OpenSolaris != KDE e.V.
KDE e.V. != OpenSolaris
OpenSolaris Project != OpenSolaris Community
--Stefan
--
Stefan
between KDE e.V. and
OpenSolaris is not the Null Set, since it contains at least one known
element. :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to
determine whether a comparison between KDE and OpenOffice, or Java,
could ever be made in the first place.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition'
KDE e.V.-Monty Python
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:03, John Plocher wrote:
Stefan Teleman wrote:
There is currently no place where Things that align well with
the kernel and/or the core utilities, that demand or require
tight integration can happen for KDE Solaris,
Consider me to be ignorant; you won't
-CDDL
flamewars. Even less so when factually incorrect information is being
presented as an advocacy tool. My understanding of participation in an
open community is predicated on the assumption of civil discourse.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
SPARC because Solaris 10 Xsun SPARC is a very
different beast than Solaris 10 Xorg x86/x64). I haven't heard of too
many people willingly running Xsun on x86/x64 for compatibility's sake
either -- compatibility in this particular case means running glxgears
at 42 FPS.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
, links and
runs on Xorg x86/x64 does not compile or link (never mind run) on Xsun
SPARC, because the header files are missing.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the nose later.
exaclty. so then back to my original question: why start off the Power
PC Solaris port with an already obsolete (and not open source) Korn
Shell ?
i have no personal emotional attachment to the Korn Shell, i use the T-Shell.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
on the collective set of irrational instincts we
might be sharing with our primate acestors.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
,
but still used by many people.
I am a bit confused about the necessity of creating a new OpenSolaris
project which states from the outset that it will be in conflict with
an existing OpenSolaris project.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
designing Skype
and none were good enough for us. We hope you agree!
if Sun can open source Solaris then whats the issue with these people ?
They don't want to open source it and they don't use SIP.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, the final decision must have been made recently.
Noone from OFD Niedersachsen has contacted KDE Solaris to at least ask
a generic question about whether or not KDE is supported on Solaris
X86.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris
On 5/29/06, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I'm asking how to make Sun C compiler do what I want?
The compiler is doing what you want, within the limits of it being
explicitly allowed to ignore what you want. :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 5/29/06, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 12:51 -0400, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On 5/29/06, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I'm asking how to make Sun C compiler do what I want?
The compiler is doing what you want, within the limits of it being
of the rest.
This translates into your software having cleaner, and more
maintainable code.
In OO-land, this is called encapsulation and polymorphism.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
audio.
stay tuned. :-)
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
of crappy Linux software. Why can't they do some QA on their stuff?
There is no Solaris driver for Jack anyway. Yet. ;-)
And Jack is really not crappy at all. The design is actually quite
clean and elegant. it is based on operating system specific loadable
modules.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL
Hi.
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solarism=114583439110822w=2
This patch installs kdiff3 for KDE 3.4.3.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi.
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solarism=114564061403078w=2
This is a thread concurrency/deadlock fix for AmaroK 1.3.5.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
Teleman
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/pdf/806-4868-10.pdf
)
will form the basis for the Streaming Server project.
I would be very interested in working on this project.--Stefan-- Stefan Teleman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
concurrency problems in amaroK 1.3.5.
These two patches are available for both IA32AMD32 and UltraSPARC-II.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 2/15/06, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 07:14 pm, Stefan Teleman wrote:
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solarism=113997299912587w=2
This patch adds Xine playback support for Microsoft Windows *.avi and
*.wmv files.
That's great! Playing
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
marked private.
it is true that it's not very difficult to guess the functions and
their usage from the header files. but i thought, since many of us
already do this, why not do it openly ?
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solarism=113997299912587w=2
This patch adds Xine playback support for Microsoft Windows *.avi and
*.wmv files.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
Forwarded-From: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solarism=113928171511102w=2
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solarism=113877382526587w=2
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
that the linking with non-GPL
code restrictions from GPL v2 have been removed.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 1/16/06, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 01:21 -0500, Stefan Teleman wrote:
The entire source code tree for the KDE 3.4.3 port is now available
for download from Sunfreeware and its mirrors:
http://www.sunfreeware.com/kde.html
Many Thanks to Steve
Advisory 20051207-1, and subsequent updates at:
http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20051207-2.txt
I strongly recommend applying this patch at your earliest convenience.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss
for K3B will follow very soon.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I would be very careful using any optimization that sets the -fns on
Sun Studio, as I've seen significant differences in results when
enabling this. For that matter, -ffast-math has a similar effect with
gcc.
No such optimization is involved, because no such flags are passed.
This is pure
necessary.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
not
in C either.
Happy New Year.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
)
with SunStudio, and let us know the results.
3. Hint: The C++ Standard (ISO/IEC 14882:2003) does not contain a
single instance of the following regular expressions:
- mangling
- virtual table
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
they
need to be written out).
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
RPATH
3. testing thoroughly 2(a) and 2(b).
As soon as we figure these out, we can have a more precise timeline.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. i have
built XComposite on
my own (from the Xorg sources), but it is extremely unstable and i
decided against releasing it, since it would have been of very little
use anyway.
the situation is identical on SPARC.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 12/28/05, Paul Gress [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The XComposite is an Xorg library. Shouldn't this be Sun's
responsibility to add. Are they going to have it in Xorg 6.9?
i really don't know. maybe AlanC could shed some light on this when he
gets back from vacation.
--Stefan
--
Stefan
Many Thank You's to Steve Christensen for making KDE 3.4.3 available
at Sun Freeware and its mirrors:
http://www.sunfreeware.com/
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi.
i upgraded K3B to version 0.12.10 (IA32 and SPARC):
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solarism=113547539525248w=2
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
on opensolaris.org sometime in Q1 '06.
Hi.
Sorry for replying at random -- first, thank you for the very kind words.
A bit of news: i have been working with Steve Christensen , and i am
very happy to let everyone know that KDE will be available on the
Companion CD.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL
I can easily sit here and ask where else can I find Scribus or FlightGear
(not to get too far off topic) other than Blastwave?!?
Scribus for Solaris has been available at KDE since early 2004 and KDE 3.3.1
--Stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
functioned with this
model for a very long time.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the 'Net, in
its various shapes, forms and incarnations.
having a real, collaborative engineering effort at OpenSolaris does
not formally imply product support from Sun.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On 12/21/05, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to base your KDE build on Blastwave libraries?
No.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
explain these reasons upon
request.
If this were to happen, I think you KDE would become more popular.
KDE is doing quite well on its own merits, with, or without Blastwave.
Stefan Teleman
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
. Openness,
honesty and fair play carry a responsibility on the part of those
involved in free software: one must be willing to take a back seat in
this show, because the show is not about particular distributions, or
individuals, but about freedom, innovation and creativity.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
).
Blastwave chose to stay silent.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 12/21/05, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Teleman wrote:
On 12/21/05, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I remember that well and as you say, nothing has happened in the
interim.
So, how can we move forward? Any common system must include Sun Solaris
packages as well
On 12/19/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many catholics will avoid to use the pill just because the pope
recommends not to use it?
i don't use the pill and i am catholic. is that bad ?
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
giving users (actual and potential) a choice.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
and followed proper procurement directives, GNOME would have a
decent chance of winning government desktops.
Are you actually trying to publicly suggest that GNOME/JDS has not
succeeded because of unfair competitive practices by KDE e.V.
Stefan Teleman
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
KDE 3.4.3 (Sun Studio 10 build) has been released.
Announcement is here:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-solarism=113497402431141w=2
Screenshots are here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/skipjackdes/sets/1603147/
Stefan Teleman
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 11/13/05, Alfredo Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to run xine-ui in Nevada b25 (Solaris Express build 25)
without success.
Here is what I have right now:
- xinelib should be compiled with gcc and linked with gld, Solaris
native ld doesn't work (lots of relocation problems)
-
that Linux is faster at some
operations. I know Sun's performance group is working to tighten up that very
gap in those areas. What does this all mean?
sure it is faster on some operations, according to the benchmark. but
the benchmark is just one aspect, in my experience.
--Stefan
--
Stefan
.
There are *no* fees to be paid for downloading, building or using KDE.
The version of QT used in KDE is the GPL version of QT. As such, there
are no fees or licenses to be paid for using the version of QT used in
KDE.
Please stop posting erroneous information.
Thank you.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
On 9/12/05, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/05, Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please stop posting erroneous information.
It is not erroneus information.
Yes, it is.
For all practical purposes, since the
very base toolkit of KDE is Qt, and you must license Qt from
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
