, they have their own
packages, their own directory structure, and to heck with complying
with any type of rules.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
here earlier, then that would
be a great system for an OpenSolaris distribution and make for great
compatability with Official Solaris releases. But, for now, yes what
you suggest sounds about right...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
packaging system is unavailable.
OpenPKG indeed is a good CPAM solution if there is no
need to maintain compatibiltiy with existing legacy packages
and local PMS.
It could also work fairly well as a native packaging system
replacement if you didn't have one to start with...
--
Shawn Walker
we do not open a can of worms related to
the cross-platform aspect.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
code
release. I'm sure it's possible...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
surprise there. The
technical inaccuracies in it (about both Solaris and Linux) were also
amusing
RedHat and IBM in this case are the sguardaddies in question. Shocking... ;)
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
, but that's Linux for you. I know, I know, I am just
joking!
Probably because it depends on the gcc3 runtime it was built against
is my guess...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
scalability
problems or other things with some of them. No offense, but of those
listed I hope that OpenSolaris would only get involved with monotone
or svk. The ideology, politics, and licensing of the others is not
something I would prefer to be involved with.
+1 to svk
--
Shawn Walker, Software
On 7/7/05, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, this has been a long winding post ( as is usual from me ) and I
am simply pouring out my thoughts here.
+1 as usual
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
On 7/7/05, Patrick Mauritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:00:30AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
That's not true of svn as far as the write access is concerned. At
least if you're using svnserve + fsfs.
uh, how does the method with which writing to the server and storage
surmise.
*rubs hands together in glee* So many fun ideas to try out now that
OpenSolaris is here...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
to maintain and certainly not
portable.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
or changes
rather easily.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
with it, but the great thing about it
is that you can change your default shell if you don't like it. You
can even make your own OpenSolaris distribution where bash is the
default. In the meantime, leave the rest of us in peace.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
. It is a certainty that if SUN
decided to change the default shell that at least some of their
customers (if not many) would experience a wide variety of issues with
shell scripts and other tools that they use on a daily basis.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED
compatability, and that is a paramount feature in enterprise level
systems.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the right thing with Solaris.
but to discard something useful for fear of incompatibilities (which are not
even proven), is not a good thing.
I never suggested such a thing, and you make it sound as if it's only
a possibility when it is already certifiably a reality.
--
Shawn Walker, Software
On 7/8/05, Danek Duvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipped all the wonderful stuff written
+1000 - a post put far more elegantly than I could given your internal
knowledge and experience
Thanks for the mini-insight into SUN's outlook on even small changes!
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems
the community has grown
in a year or two? Ain't life grand?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
to
Alexander update the boot archives. Next reboot worked fine.
Alexander Sunil,
Alexander This is bug 6294481.
P.S. See bug 6294769 as well.
Unfortunately, neither of those bugs appear to be accessible via
bugs.opensolaris.org...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems
, non-debug bins will be
provided in the near future, right now the build infrastructure needed
to support it isn't there (what I last heard) and the person who can
do that has a very long todo list at the moment I believe.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
'su' under Solaris uses PAM for authentication.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 7/9/05, Scott Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 08:37:57PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
I would say you've found a bug then. Since the roles manpage claims
Or far more likely he's done something wrong in configuring the role.
Thanks for the research. I feel better now
(as of a few days ago when I checked). As long as
application providers continue to treat Solaris x86 like an
illegitimate child the Solaris experience will be subpar as well for
applications.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
to user root as possible and without it the
behaviour is same. so, where did I mess up?
I don't think user_attr changes will show up until that user has
logged out and logged back in.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
had the same problem when using a build tool recently that
went to check user_attr to see if I had package management rights. I
had went and added those rights, then went back to the terminal and
the tool still thought I didn't have the rights. Once I logged out and
back in it was fine.
--
Shawn
to do so.
So wait for a package update that will be along just as soon as possible.
+1 to the Dennisnator as always :}
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss
forth, and create your bountiful distribution full of all the choices
you wish to make.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
the fact that they
are not legal, a legitimate option would be greatly appreciated.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
for individual distribution creators.
I look forward with great anticipation to what lies ahead, because I
think that I can only get better from here if foresight and planning
are used as our primary tools going forward.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
mirrors. But, it
would be better to me if it the official or central site was
opensolaris.org, if only because it would help make it really seem
like it was really *part* of the main OpenSolaris community effort.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
, I'm just contributing in
whatever way I can...
Thanks,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
problems.
Could star, be used as a replacement for Solaris tar program without
causing *any* incompatibilities? Since you so graciously released it
under the CDDL, it seems like it would be idea as a replacement. I
certainly find it much faster then GNU tar, and faster than Solaris
tar.
--
Shawn
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
with what you describe...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, but it's built on the most
promising base, named QT.
While I respect that is your opinion, please don't start KDE vs. GNOME
flamewars using inflammatory language.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
issue actually becomes a problem, then at
that point it's time to fork. I often run into the same problem with
Software that I package to run on production servers for the company I
work for.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
that could go a long ways towards helping achieve the goal.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
It is a *UNIX* industry standard regardless of whether it is a *Linux*
industry standard, since Linux is certainly not UNIX.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss
, it was more of a
curiosity question... You've more than answered adequately.
Thanks,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
locations and configure options...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
of them.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
? That would help considerably with the
process...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Einstein
http://physics.augustana.edu/einstein.html
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
.html
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 7/18/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/18/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that the installation media did not get burned correctly.
If you have another system
On 7/18/05, Sunil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this to tools-discuss instead of the big list; it's
likely to be of
no tools-discuss here: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/index.jspa ...:(
Look here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/discussions/
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
are to ensure your
shell exits. GDM will be the graphic login manager on subsequent
reboots. Note that the FMRI for GDM may change in a future release of
Solaris as it is an Unstable interface (as per the definition in
attributes(5)).
From:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/darren/20050318
--
Shawn Walker
On 7/20/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How may I set verbosemode to a value != 0 and when will
we have full sources for multiboot?
I'm pretty sure verbosemode is activated by doing -v to the kernel...
Just like one does -kdv...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
some agreement and
compromise among the parties involved.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
...
Is that still considered the proper practice? Would I be considered
evil if I released packages without the prefixes?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
repository sounds ok, trying to actually work
with Debian to create an OpenSolaris distribution seems a lost
battle at best.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
if it is perhaps our favourite one sometimes).
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
No, it's simply a set of ideas you don't agree with. It may not fit
with the Solaris philosophy, but it doesn't make it any less valid as
an idea, experiment, or project.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
since you can already use about 28 characters anyway.
So is it ok for me to name my packages libfoo, progname, etc or not?
I'm confused ;)
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Guidelines can be very strict at times
justifiably or not is a matter of opinion. Even if the CDDL wasn't an
obstacle, I don't believe they would accept the binary redistribution
guidelines that parts of ON will likely always be under.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 7/23/05, Sunil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grep pkg-name /var/sadm/install/contents |awk '{print $1}' to see which
files were installed by a package? when is this simple request going to be
merged in 'pkginfo -l'?
Workaround example:
pkgchk -v SUNWGtku
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems
On 7/25/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith M Wesolowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:39:09PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
justifiably or not is a matter of opinion. Even if the CDDL wasn't an
obstacle, I don't believe they would accept the binary
if Solaris leads
OpenSolaris or the other way around. Your ideas are noble, but please
don't assume that everyone has to work the way you say they do.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
too.
snip
Let's move this to opensolaris-help, please remove opensolaris-discuss
from the to or cc lines in any further replies.
To answer your question, we need more info, see this blog entry:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/comments/dmick/Weblog/diagnosing_kernel_hangs_panics_with
--
Shawn Walker
, and then
copying or moving all the files out of the SOURCES directory to some
place of your choice in a new structure of your own.
You don't really have to use pkgadd to use the JDS source downloads at
all. I didn't :)
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
for
ksh88, or to add the necessary compatability to ksh93. I don't think
anyone was implying that pdksh could be used as a drop-in replacement
(at least I don't think so).
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
what.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the choice out of at least 5 there. On Solaris I even did not
find a way to mount a ext2fs partition... (well using nfs and mount it on
another machine was no problem.)
ext2fs:
http://www.sun.drydog.com/faq/9.html#9.24
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
, and sparc32/64. Probably a simple matter to correct, but I
haven't looked into it yet.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
) or those who have access
the source. While they can't tell you what the source says exactly,
they could answer specific behaviour questions.
So, I disagree, it is not impossible, it is quite possible.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
or may not be documented well enough to reimplement
compatability. Let's hope it is, and that the fine details can be
sorted out with those that have source access. If it's really that
important to anyone, someone will do it of that I'm certain.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL
On 7/28/05, Tao Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/28/05, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that's a very practical view. There is a *lot* of
hardware out there that cannot be used without some binary component.
Not just wifi, but many others. Quite frankly
extremely shortsighted, not to mention counterproductive.
+1
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
mount my fat32 partition as:
mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c0d0p2:1 /export/fat-g
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
that
already have answers on the front page of the site you were asking
about in some cases, and not only that unfairly accusing others of
having a bad attitude because they wouldn't supply you with answers
that you could easily obtain on your own through proper channels.
--
Shawn Walker, Software
for me to learn and has been far easier to use.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
again.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 8/10/05, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 17:40, Shawn Walker wrote:
+1 - Just got a laptop today ;)
Install Solaris yet?
Not yet, I'm a bit leary since I just got it and it's already taken
some time to get it ready for work. I might do it this weekend
On 8/11/05, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 13:17, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 8/10/05, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 17:40, Shawn Walker wrote:
+1 - Just got a laptop today ;)
Install Solaris yet?
Not yet, I'm a bit
...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 8/12/05, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 19:08, Rich Teer wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Shawn Walker wrote:
It's a Dell Inspiron 9300. The main devices I care about are the Intel
Pro Wireless 2200B Chipset (Centrino), SigmTel C-Major Audio, and the
OK
On 8/12/05, W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
As I mentioned without working wireless, it's rather useless to me.
If a wireless is so critical, you can try an ethernet bridge, which connects
your ethernet port to a wireless router. The one I have is a Linksys
, they've always
been the most open with their distribution sources, and is one of the
reasons why there are so many packages out there available for their
distribtuions as well as distributions that have been created based
off their work.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 8/19/05, Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If opensolaris ever went GPL, I'd be gone in an
instant, and I suspect
others would as well. Because at that point, it
would become useless
Nobody was suggesting that Open Solaris go GPL,
merely
.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
modules. -
Linus Torvalds
The message I linked above is one of the reasons why I've never
contributed and will probably never contribute to the Linux kernel.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
On 8/23/05, Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still waiting... :-(
So am I, you're not alone :)
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
that
is part of the OpenSolaris project, well that's different, but it
doesn't appear to be the case.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
.
The GPL is the one preventing CDDL code from being linked, not the
CDDL. If the GPL were more flexible, the CDDL would not have been
necessary possibly.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
part in the processes to get a better understanding of
them.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. As far as the Enterprise Linux world, I almost always see
ext3 as the de facto standard. I also don't see that changing in the
near year or two. Maybe after that, but I have my doubts.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
, though I could say the same about early versions of
XFS for Linux. I can't recall a single case of data corruption that I
could blame on ext2/ext3.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
, or even the end-user, so it is a problem for debian.
And it isn't a risk for an author?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
On 9/7/05, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, indeed. But i guess the CDDL is also LGPL incompatible ?
I don't see how, given that the LGPL is compatible to proprietary
non-(open source/free)-software. From what I see the LGPL is
compatible with just abou any license...
--
Shawn Walker
?
GRUB doesn't needs to recognize the NTFS partition to use a
chainloader. Just make sure you use the appropriate hd0,x
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss
KDE here :-)
Wasted time? As long as *commercial* native KDE applications have to
pay the Trolltech Tax GNOME is the only viable alternative for many
commercial endeavors.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
On 9/11/05, Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/05, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasted time? As long as *commercial* native KDE applications have to
pay the Trolltech Tax GNOME is the only viable alternative for many
commercial endeavors.
KDE does not publish
On 9/11/05, Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/12/05, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/05, Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please stop posting erroneous information.
While parts of GNOME are released under the GPL, the main libraries
that matter
On 9/14/05, Richard L. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Get it yet? Please let me know when you do; I'm still waiting...
I have mine, zip 66219 (a few days ago).
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com
On 9/14/05, Javier O. Augusto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander,
Thank you for your extremely valuable tip. I tried the gconf thingie on
the URL you provided but didn't work out. One thing that did work was
adding:
Try this:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/26020
--
Shawn
On Mon 17 Apr 2006 at 05:28PM, Daniel B. Price wrote:
Can I ask a dumb question: why are we calling this
the muskoka
project?
Naming a mailing list filled with technical kernel
content after an obscure
lake in Canada seems maximally confusing to me, and
would seem to make
it harder for
I think the problem is not the criticism, but rather, the way in which it is
presented. The blog entry doesn't really qualify as constructive criticism
because it fails to offer valid and well-reasoned opinions about the work of
others, usually involving both positive and negative comments, in
1 - 100 of 1390 matches
Mail list logo
