Greetings,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
Back in Havana a, partially-implemented[0][1], Cinder driver was merged
in Glance to provide an easier and hopefully more consistent interaction
between glance, cinder and nova when it comes to
On 10/22/2014 02:30 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Greetings,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
Back in Havana a, partially-implemented[0][1], Cinder driver was merged
in Glance to provide an easier and hopefully more consistent interaction
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/22/2014 02:30 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Greetings,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
wrote:
Greetings,
Back in Havana a, partially-implemented[0][1], Cinder driver was merged
Replied in inline.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/22/2014 02:30 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Greetings,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
Back in Havana a, partially-implemented[0][1], Cinder driver
On 2014-10-22 10:05 AM, John Griffith wrote:
Ideas started spreading from there to Using a Read Only Cinder Volume
per image, to A Glance owned Cinder Volume that would behave pretty
much the current local disk/file-system model (Create a Cinder Volume
for Glance, attach it to the Glance
On 10/17/2014 05:57 AM, Fei Long Wang wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for the heads up. Is there a bug opened to track this? If not,
I'm going to open one and dig into it. Cheers.
Hey Fei Long,
Thanks for taking care of this, please keep me in the loop.
@Jeremy: Thanks for the heads up
Flavio
On 2014-10-17 16:57:59 +1300 (+1300), Fei Long Wang wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. Is there a bug opened to track this? If
not, I'm going to open one and dig into it. Cheers.
Gah! You'd think *I* would know better at this point--sorry about
that... I've now opened
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:01:22PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Gah! You'd think *I* would know better at this point--sorry about
that... I've now opened https://launchpad.net/bugs/1382582 to track
this. Thanks for any assistance you're able to provide!
This looks like a continuation of the
On 2014-10-17 16:17:39 +0100 (+0100), Louis Taylor wrote:
This looks like a continuation of the old PYTHONHASHSEED bug:
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1348818
The underlying design choices in python-glanceclient's tests do
cause both problems (can't run with a random hash seed, but also
can't
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for the heads up. Is there a bug opened to track this? If not,
I'm going to open one and dig into it. Cheers.
On 17/10/14 14:17, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
As part of an effort to deprecate our specialized testing platform
for Python 3.3, many of us have been working to confirm
Eddie,
+1 on glance-spec
We might want to define the scope. How far are we diverging from Openstack
policy structure? Are there any other use cases which need policy changes? -
some questions which come to my mind.
Thanks,
-Nikhil
From: Eddie Sheffield
On Oct 6, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Eddie Sheffield eddie.sheffi...@rackspace.com
wrote:
I encountered an interesting situation with Glance policies. Basically we
have a situation where users in certain roles are not allowed to make certain
calls at all. In this specific case, we don't want users
Thanks for bringing this up Flavio! Let's wait another week to get some
feedback. Also, we can discuss the fate of this driver in our weekly meeting to
be on safe side.
Thanks,
-Nikhil
From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, October 03,
I think one of the use case is you can tag images with some simple
label/mark, like 'windows', 'x64', 'ubuntu', etc. Then user can search
the images easily with the possible tags he will be interested in. It
could be very useful if there are tons of images, especially if you're
providing an
From: Fei Long Wang [feil...@catalyst.net.nz]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 5:20 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][tags] - What is the purpose of tags?
I think one of the use case is you can tag
Thanks for diving on this grenade, Alex!
FWIW, I agree with all of your assessments. Just in case I am mistaken, I
summarize them as smaller updates logical clocks wall clocks (due to
imprecision and skew).
Given the small size of your patch [4], I'd say lets try to land that. It
is nicer to
Thanks, Nikhil, for offering to take on this responsibility.
I know you've had a lot of experience with Glance in the past and I feel
comfortable knowing that you'll be around to keep the project moving
forwards!
Cheers!
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Nikhil Komawar
On 09/22/2014 07:22 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Greetings,
I will not be running for PTL for Glance for the Kilo release.
I want to thank all of the nice folks I've worked with--especially the
attendees and sponsors of the mid-cycle meetups, which I think were a
major success and one of
Hi Mark,
Many thanks for your great work and leadership! Personally I have to
say thank you for your mentorship for me. Let's still keep in touch in
Glance/OpenStack.
zhiyan
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Mark Washenberger
mark.washenber...@markwash.net wrote:
Greetings,
I will not be
Yes, IIRC, these extra properties will be handled to lower case, see
https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/common/utils.py#L236
What's the nova bug you're talking about? Cheers.
On 24/09/14 16:21, Chen CH Ji wrote:
Got following result when doing bug analysis on nova , is
Hi Mark,
Many thanks for your leadership, and keeping glance so enjoyable to work on
over the last few cycles.
-Stuart
From: Mark Washenberger mark.washenber...@markwash.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL
I am really sorry to see you step down, but congratulations!
cheers,
brian
From: Mark Washenberger [mark.washenber...@markwash.net]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 12:22 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL Non-Candidacy
+1 You will be missed Mark. Thank you for your leadership and mentorship.
Iccha
On 9/23/14, 5:59 AM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
Many thanks for your leadership, and keeping glance so enjoyable to work
on over the last few cycles.
-Stuart
From: Mark
Thank you so much for your leadership, and especially the mentorship
for me. I suppose you're still not far away from Glance team :) Let's
have a team lunch at the summit like we did at HK summit.
On 23/09/14 05:22, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Greetings,
I will not be running for PTL for Glance
Thanks mark for all your support. We will really miss you as a PTL.
From: Mark Washenberger [mailto:mark.washenber...@markwash.net]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:23 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL Non-Candidacy
Greetings,
I will not be
On 09/16/2014 01:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2014-09-15 16:02:04 -0700:
On 09/15/2014 07:00 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi there logging experts,
We've recently had a little disagreement in the glance team about the
appropriate log levels for http
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: 16 September 2014 10:08
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log
level
guidelines
On 09/16/2014 01:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts
On 09/16/2014 06:44 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: 16 September 2014 10:08
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log
level
guidelines
On 09/16
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 16 September 2014 12:40
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log
level
guidelines
On 09/16/2014 06:44 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
-Original
On 09/16/2014 10:16 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 16 September 2014 12:40
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log
level
guidelines
On 09/16/2014 06
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 16 September 2014 15:56
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log
level
guidelines
On 09/16/2014 10:16 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
-Original
On 09/16/2014 12:07 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 16 September 2014 15:56
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log
level
guidelines
On 09/16/2014 10
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 16 September 2014 17:31
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log
level
guidelines
On 09/16/2014 12:07 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
-Original
On 09/16/2014 10:16 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
In my point of view it makes life
much easier if we have information where the request failed
The request did not fail. The HTTP request succeeded and Glance returned
a 404 Not Found. If the caller was expecting an image to be there, but
it
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 September 2014 18:10
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][all] Help with interpreting the log
level
guidelines
On 09/16/2014 10:16 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
In my
On 09/16/2014 02:04 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
-Original Message- From: Jay Pipes
[mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 September 2014 18:10 To:
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
[glance][all] Help with interpreting the log level guidelines
On 09/16/2014 10:16
On 09/15/2014 07:00 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi there logging experts,
We've recently had a little disagreement in the glance team about the
appropriate log levels for http requests that end up failing due to user
errors. An example would be a request to get an image that does not
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2014-09-15 16:02:04 -0700:
On 09/15/2014 07:00 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi there logging experts,
We've recently had a little disagreement in the glance team about the
appropriate log levels for http requests that end up failing due to user
On 09/15/2014 07:00 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi there logging experts,
We've recently had a little disagreement in the glance team about the
appropriate log levels for http requests that end up failing due to user
errors. An example would be a request to get an image that does not
exist,
On 09/11/2014 02:28 PM, Cindy Pallares wrote:
Hi Folks!
Glance is having its bug triage day today! Please help out if you can.
You can check out the tasks here:
http://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glancebugday
Also here are some handy links to the untriaged bugs in glance and the
client:
On 09/10/2014 11:52 AM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
All,
The 0.14.0 client breaks all v2 requests when pointed at a glance server
which is running code which is more than a few days old (ie pretty much
any production server).
There's a band-aid patch here:
On 09/10/2014 11:52 AM, stuart.mclaren at hp.com wrote:
All,
The 0.14.0 client breaks all v2 requests when pointed at a glance server
which is running code which is more than a few days old (ie pretty much
any production server).
There's a band-aid patch here:
On 09/10/2014 01:40 PM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
On 09/10/2014 11:52 AM, stuart.mclaren at hp.com wrote:
All,
The 0.14.0 client breaks all v2 requests when pointed at a glance server
which is running code which is more than a few days old (ie pretty much
any production server).
On 9/3/14, 3:59 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 9/3/14, 2:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 09/03/2014 03:12 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Excerpts from Kuvaja, Erno's message of 2014-09-03 12:30:08 +:
Hi All,
While investigating glanceclient gating issues we
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 07/23/2014 06:05 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
It looks like the switch to requests in python-glanceclient
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78269/) has broken nova when SSL is
enabled.
I think it is related to the custom object that the
In principle I don't think these changes need FFE, because they aren't
really features so much as fixes for better logging and
internationalization.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com wrote:
All,
There is two changes still not landed from
Kekane, Abhishek wrote:
[...]
If we have this feature in glance then we can able to use features like
reload glance configuration file without restart, graceful shutdown etc.
Also it will use common code like other OpenStack projects nova,
keystone, cinder does.
I think it makes a lot of
Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to request a FFE for 2 features I've been working on during
Juno which, unfortunately, haven been delayed for different reasons
during this time.
[...]
I would be inclined to give both a chance, but they really need to merge
quickly, and the
, Abhishek
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* RE: [openstack-dev] [glance][feature freeze exception]
Proposal for using Launcher/ProcessLauncher for launching services
Hi All,
Please give your support me
I'm +1 on the FFE for both of these branches.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/05/2014 05:20 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like to request a FFE for 2 features I've been working on during
Juno which,
Honestly, I don't think we should pin this. This seems like a pretty
easy fix in the code and the only unit tests that are failing are the
ones testing invalid endpoints.
My vote is to fix glanceclient instead and do a release.
-Sean
On 09/03/2014 08:30 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
Hi All,
Hi All,
Please give your support me for applying the freeze exception for using
oslo-incubator service framework in glance, based on the following blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/use-common-service-framework
I have ensured that after making these changes everything is
(not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][feature freeze exception] Proposal for
using Launcher/ProcessLauncher for launching services
Hi All,
Please give your support me for applying the freeze exception for using
oslo-incubator service framework in glance, based on the following
cannot without this patch.
Thanks Regards,
Abhishek Kekane
From: Kekane, Abhishek
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [glance][feature freeze exception] Proposal
Excerpts from Kuvaja, Erno's message of 2014-09-03 12:30:08 +:
Hi All,
While investigating glanceclient gating issues we narrowed it down to
requests 2.4.0 which was released 2014-08-29. Urllib3 seems to be raising new
ProtocolError which does not get catched and breaks at least
On 09/03/2014 03:12 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Excerpts from Kuvaja, Erno's message of 2014-09-03 12:30:08 +:
Hi All,
While investigating glanceclient gating issues we narrowed it down to
requests 2.4.0 which was released 2014-08-29. Urllib3 seems to be raising
new ProtocolError which
On 9/3/14, 2:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 09/03/2014 03:12 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Excerpts from Kuvaja, Erno's message of 2014-09-03 12:30:08 +:
Hi All,
While investigating glanceclient gating issues we narrowed it down to
requests 2.4.0 which was released 2014-08-29.
,
Abhishek Kekane
-Original Message-
From: stuart.mcla...@hp.com [mailto:stuart.mcla...@hp.com]
Sent: 01 September 2014 21:25
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Use Launcher/ProcessLauncher in glance
I've been looking at the most recent patch
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Use Launcher/ProcessLauncher in
glance
Hi Jay,
Thank you for your response.
I will soon submit patch for the same.
Thanks,
Rajesh Tailor
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 8:07 AM
On 08/22/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:09:10AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
Earlier this week the freshness checks (the ones that required passing
results within 24 hrs for a change to go into the gate) were removed to
try to conserve nodes as we get to crunch
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2014-08-21 20:14:12 -0700:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of 2014-08-20 13:14:28 -0700:
During last Atlanta summit there were couple discussions about
Application
On 08/20/2014 10:14 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
During last Atlanta summit there were couple discussions about
Application Catalog and Application space projects in OpenStack. These
cross-project discussions occurred as a result of Murano incubation
request [1] during Icehouse cycle. On
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:09:10AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
Earlier this week the freshness checks (the ones that required passing
results within 24 hrs for a change to go into the gate) were removed to
try to conserve nodes as we get to crunch time. The hopes were that
review teams had enough
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2014-08-21 20:14:12 -0700:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of 2014-08-20 13:14:28
-0700:
On 21/08/14 04:30, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
During last Atlanta summit there were couple discussions about
Application Catalog and Application space projects in OpenStack. These
cross-project discussions occurred as a result of Murano incubation
request [1] during
Hi,
Let me comment on the reasons why we’ve suggested adding Murano engine to
Orchestration program.
If we consider the previous Murano incubation discussions, we see that an
overlap with the Orchestration program was one of the TC’s concerns. We
also find that it was the Heat team that
On 23/08/14 00:09, Sean Dague wrote:
Earlier this week the freshness checks (the ones that required passing
results within 24 hrs for a change to go into the gate) were removed to
try to conserve nodes as we get to crunch time. The hopes were that
review teams had enough handle on what when
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Review priorities
On 08/21/2014 11:59 PM, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
Greetings,
The Juno-3 feature freeze is not far away (September 4th). See [1] for
more information.
We have a bunch of outstanding patches that need to get reviewed. We
are trying
Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
During last Atlanta summit there were couple discussions about
Application Catalog and Application space projects in OpenStack. These
cross-project discussions occurred as a result of Murano incubation
request [1] during Icehouse cycle. On the TC meeting devoted
On 08/21/2014 11:59 PM, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
Greetings,
The Juno-3 feature freeze is not far away (September 4th). See [1] for
more information.
We have a bunch of outstanding patches that need to get reviewed. We are
trying to come with a list of the most important features/bugs [2].
So
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
During last Atlanta summit there were couple discussions about Application
Catalog and Application space projects in OpenStack. These cross-project
discussions occurred as a result of Murano incubation
*Murano UI to Dashboard Program*
Application Catalog requires a UI focused on user experience. Currently
there is a Horizon plugin for Murano App Catalog which adds Application
catalog page to browse, search and filter applications. It also adds a
dynamic UI functionality to render a
Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of 2014-08-20 13:14:28 -0700:
During last Atlanta summit there were couple discussions about Application
Catalog and Application space projects in OpenStack. These cross-project
discussions occurred as a result of Murano incubation request [1]
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of 2014-08-20 13:14:28 -0700:
During last Atlanta summit there were couple discussions about
Application
Catalog and Application space projects in OpenStack. These
On 08/08/2014 08:49 AM, Tomoki Sekiyama wrote:
Hi all,
I'm considering how I can apply image download/upload bandwidth limit for
glance for network QoS.
There was a review for the bandwidth limit, however it is abandoned.
* Download rate limiting
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21380/
On 08/08/2014 04:17 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/08/2014 08:49 AM, Tomoki Sekiyama wrote:
Hi all,
I'm considering how I can apply image download/upload bandwidth limit for
glance for network QoS.
There was a review for the bandwidth limit, however it is abandoned.
* Download rate limiting
+1, That’s what suggested in the blueprint a year ago:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/transfer-rate-limiting
It looks like consensus during summit discussion that rate limiting should be
a separate facility running as a proxy in front of glance.”
Thanks,
Arnaud
On Aug 8, 2014,
On 8/8/14 16:28 , Arnaud Legendre
alegen...@vmware.commailto:alegen...@vmware.com wrote:
+1, That’s what suggested in the blueprint a year ago:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/transfer-rate-limiting
It looks like consensus during summit discussion that rate limiting should be
a
On 08/01/2014 10:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
cc'ing ML since it's an important discussion, IMO...
On 07/31/2014 11:54 AM, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
Hi Jay,
I would be interested if you could share your point of view on this
item: we want to make the glance stores a standalone library
Duncan Thomas
On Aug 1, 2014 9:44 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup. Though I'd love for this code to live in olso, not glance...
Why Oslo? There seems to be a general obsession with getting things into
Oslo, but our (cinder team) general experiences with the end result have
been
On 08/04/2014 09:09 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
Duncan Thomas
On Aug 1, 2014 9:44 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup. Though I'd love for this code to live in olso, not glance...
Why Oslo? There seems to be a general obsession with getting things into
Oslo,
On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/04/2014 09:09 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
Duncan Thomas
On Aug 1, 2014 9:44 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup. Though I'd love for this code to live in olso, not glance...
Why Oslo?
On 08/04/2014 09:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/04/2014 09:09 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
Duncan Thomas
On Aug 1, 2014 9:44 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup. Though I'd love for this
On 08/04/2014 10:29 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 08/04/2014 09:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/04/2014 09:09 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
Duncan Thomas
On Aug 1, 2014 9:44 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com
On 08/04/2014 05:56 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/04/2014 10:29 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 08/04/2014 09:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/04/2014 09:09 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
Duncan Thomas
On Aug 1, 2014 9:44 PM, Jay Pipes
cc'ing ML since it's an important discussion, IMO...
On 07/31/2014 11:54 AM, Arnaud Legendre wrote:
Hi Jay,
I would be interested if you could share your point of view on this
item: we want to make the glance stores a standalone library
(glance.stores) which would be consumed directly by Nova
On 07/23/2014 06:05 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
It looks like the switch to requests in python-glanceclient
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78269/) has broken nova when SSL is
enabled.
I think it is related to the custom object that the glanceclient uses.
If another
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Scott Devoid dev...@anl.gov wrote:
So it turns out that fixing this issue is not very simple. It turns out
that there are stubbed out openstack.common.policy checks in the glance-api
code, which are pretty much useless because they do not use the image as a
-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Use Launcher/ProcessLauncher in
glance
On 07/17/2014 03:07 AM, Tailor, Rajesh wrote:
Hi all,
Why glance is not using Launcher/ProcessLauncher (oslo-incubator) for
its wsgi service like it is used in other openstack projects i.e
...@nttdata.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:13 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Use Launcher/ProcessLauncher in glance
Hi Jay,
Thank you for your response.
I will soon submit patch for the same.
Thanks,
Rajesh Tailor
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Trove] Metadata Catalog
+1
We are unsure when these changes will get into glance.
IMO we should go ahead will our instance metadata patch for now and when
things are ready in glance land we can
Hi Malini,
I would be pleased to work with you on the effort to make the import of OVA
working out of tree using the Glance tasks.
I am sure many people will be delighted by this feature and I also agree with
Mark in the fact that there might be a problem a message by bringing this
feature in
Hi Denis,
I think this is a perfect time for you to review the spec for the glance
metadata catalog https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98554/ and see if it fits
your use case.
Also, we have a session tomorrow at 9:00am PST at the Glance meetup to discuss
this topic. I think it would be useful if
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arnaud Legendre alegen...@vmware.com
wrote:
Hi Denis,
I think this is a perfect time for you to review the spec for the glance
metadata catalog https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98554/ and see if it
fits your use case.
Also, we have a session tomorrow at
So it turns out that fixing this issue is not very simple. It turns out
that there are stubbed out openstack.common.policy checks in the glance-api
code, which are pretty much useless because they do not use the image as a
target. [1] Then there's a chain of API / client calls where it's unclear
Speaking as a ‘database guy’ and a ‘Trove guy’, I’ll say this; “Metadata” is a
very generic term and the meaning of “metadata” in a database context is very
different from the meaning of “metadata” in the context that Glance is
providing.
Furthermore the usage and access pattern for this
Denis,
The scope of the metadata api goes beyond just using the glance metadata.
The metadata can be used for instances and and other objects to add extra
data like tags or something else that maybe a UI might want to use. We need
this feature either way.
-Craig
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:17
@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Trove] Metadata Catalog
Denis,
The scope of the metadata api goes beyond just using the glance metadata. The
metadata can be used for instances and and other objects to add extra data like
tags or something else
From: Iccha Sethi [iccha.se...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 4:02 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Trove] Metadata Catalog
+1
We are unsure when these changes will get
Hi Jay,
Thank you for your response.
I will soon submit patch for the same.
Thanks,
Rajesh Tailor
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 8:07 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Use Launcher
1001 - 1100 of 1327 matches
Mail list logo
