[openstack-dev] [tripleo] [neutron] Current containerized neutron agents introduce a significant regression in the dataplane

Hi, The neutron agents are implemented in such a way that key functionality is implemented in terms of haproxy, dnsmasq, keepalived and radvd configuration. The agents manage instances of these services but, by design, the parent is the top-most (pid 1). On baremetal this has the advantage that,

[openstack-dev] [watcher] weekly meeting has changed

Hi Watchers, As many of you asked, we have changed odd weekly meeting time from 13:00 UTC to 08:00 UTC. We will have meeting tomorrow at 08:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt. Don’t forget to make changes in your calendar[1] ;) [1]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Watcher_Team_Meeting Best

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Notification update week 7

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 2/12/2018 11:11 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote: Add the user id and project id of the user initiated the instance action to the notification - The bp

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] No Meeting This week

> Looks heat-dashboard does not have stable/queens branch yet. > I got an indication about this from Horizon core and they are waiting for that heat-dashboard will have it. > (we want to drop django <= 1.10 support along with Horizon for Rocky) > Cloud you kindly take care of this issue ? Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on containerized undercloud

On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 14:39 -0800, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:30 PM, James Slagle > wrote: > [...] > > > You may want to add an item for the routed ctlplane work that > > landed > > at the end of Queens. Afaik, that will need to be supported with > >

[openstack-dev] [ptg] Selected post-lunch presentations

Hi everyone, The TC members selected the topics for the post-lunch presentations at the PTG. The idea is to finish the lunch break with some light infusion of knowledge. Those will happen starting at 1pm in the lunch room. Discussions restart at 1:30pm so we recommend targeting a 20-min talk +

[openstack-dev] [neutron] QoS IRC meeting

Hi, I have to cancel todays Neutron QoS IRC meeting. If You have something related to QoS that You want to talk about, please catch me on openstack-neutron irc channel. — Best regards Slawek Kaplonski sla...@kaplonski.pl

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:05:34PM +0900, gmann wrote: > Hi Infra Team, > > I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs and their migration part. From > zuulv3 doc [1], it is clear about migrating the job definition and use > those among cross repo pipeline etc. > > But I did not find clear

[openstack-dev] [barbican] weekly meeting time

Hi all, The Barbican weekly meeting has been fairly sparsely attended for a little while now, and the most active contributors these days appear to be in Asia. Its time to consider moving the weekly meeting to a time when more contributors can attend. I'm going to propose a couple times below

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:06 PM Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:05:34PM +0900, gmann wrote: > > Hi Infra Team, > > > > I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs and their migration part. From > > zuulv3 doc [1], it is clear about migrating the job definition

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-07

On 2018-02-13 10:08 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > # PostgreSQL and Triggers > > Later in the [same > day](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-02-07.log.html#t2018-02-07T17:18:56) > > > there was some discussion about the state of PostgreSQL support and >

[openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

Hi Infra Team, I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs and their migration part. From zuulv3 doc [1], it is clear about migrating the job definition and use those among cross repo pipeline etc. But I did not find clear recommendation that whether project's pipeline definition should stay in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on containerized undercloud

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:40 AM, Harald Jensås wrote: > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 14:39 -0800, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:30 PM, James Slagle > > wrote: > > [...] > > > > > You may want to add an item for the routed ctlplane work

Re: [openstack-dev] [monasca][congress] help configuring monasca for gate

Hi Eric, glad to hear the problems are solved :) What are your plans around integration with Monasca? Please let us know if you have related feature requests. Cheers Witek > -Original Message- > From: Eric K [mailto:ekcs.openst...@gmail.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 13. Februar 2018 03:59 >

[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-07

HTML: https://anticdent.org/tc-report-18-07.html A few things to report from the past week of TC interaction. Not much in the way of opportunities to opine or editorialize. # Goals Still more on the topic of OpenStack wide goals. There was some robust

[openstack-dev] [FEMDC] Wed. 14 Feb - IRC Meeting 15:00 UTC

Dear all, A gentle reminder for our tomorrow meeting at 15:00 UTC. A draft of the agenda is available at line 202, you are very welcome to add any item: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2018 Best regards, Dimitri

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-07

On 2018-02-13 11:31 AM, gordon chung wrote: > > > was there a resolution for this? iiuc, pgsql is not supported by glance > based on: > https://github.com/openstack/glance/commit/f268df1cbc3c356c472ace04bd4f2d4b3da6c026 > err... nevermind. it seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-07

On 2/13/2018 10:31 AM, gordon chung wrote: was there a resolution for this? iiuc, pgsql is not supported by glance based on: https://github.com/openstack/glance/commit/f268df1cbc3c356c472ace04bd4f2d4b3da6c026 i don't know if it was a bad commit but it seems to break any case that tries to use

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][python3] python3 readiness?

Since python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 [1] it is a reasonable conjecture that downstream distributions will drop support for python 2 between now and then, perhaps as early as next year. In Pike, OpenStack projects, including TripleO, added python 3 unit tests. That effort was a

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] The Weekly Owl - 9th Edition

Note: this is the ninth edition of a weekly update of what happens in TripleO. The goal is to provide a short reading (less than 5 minutes) to learn where we are and what we're doing. Any contributions and feedback are welcome. Link to the previous version:

[openstack-dev] [automaton] How to extend automaton?

https://github.com/openstack/automaton Friendly state machines for python. A few questions about automaton. 1. I would like to know can we addition parameters on on_enter or on_exit callbacks. Right now, it seems it only allows state and triggered_event. a. I have many FSM

[openstack-dev] [Elections][Kolla][QA][Mistral] Last Days for Voting in the PTL Elections

Hello Kolla, Mistral & QA contributors, Just a quick reminder that elections are closing soon, if you haven't already you should use your right to vote and pick your favourite candidate! You have until Feb 14, 2018 23:45 UTC. Thanks for your time! -Kendall Nelson(diablo_rojo)

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Rocky PTG team dinner

Dear Neutrinos, We will have our traditional PTG team dinner on Thursday March 1st at 7pm. The place is to be defined. In the meantime, if you will attend the PTG, please put your name in the "Attendees" section at to the top of the etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-ptg-rocky)

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [neutron] Current containerized neutron agents introduce a significant regression in the dataplane

On 13 February 2018 at 14:02, Brent Eagles wrote: > Hi, > > The neutron agents are implemented in such a way that key functionality is > implemented in terms of haproxy, dnsmasq, keepalived and radvd > configuration. The agents manage instances of these services but, by >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][python3] python3 readiness?

On 02/13/2018 01:57 PM, Tom Barron wrote: Since python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 [1] it is a reasonable conjecture that downstream distributions will drop support for python 2 between now and then, perhaps as early as next year. I'm not sure I agree. I suspect python 2 support

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] priority review etherpad

Following this up since we have a few bugs that need to be addressed for RC2, all of which are tagged and targeted appropriately in Launchpad for the stable/queens backport process [0]. All bugs have fixes in review to both master and stable/queens [1]. I'll keep an eye on them and respond to

[openstack-dev] [all][infra] PTG Infra Helproom Info and Signup

Hello everyone, Last PTG the infra helproom seemed to work out for projects that knew about it. The biggest problem seemed to be that other projects either just weren't aware that there is/was an Infra helproom or didn't know when an appropriate time to show up would be. We are going to try a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Generalized issues in the unit testing of ML2 mechanism drivers

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Michel Peterson wrote: > Through my work in networking-odl I've found what I believe is an issue > present in a majority of ML2 drivers. An issue I think needs awareness so > each project can decide a course of action. > > The issue stems from

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [OVN] L3 traffic

I'm not aware of plans for OVN to supported distributed SNAT, therefor a networking node will still be required for the foreseeable future. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:18 AM, wenran xiao wrote: > Hey all, > I have found Network OVN will support to distributed floating ip >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][infra] zuul job definitions overrides and the irrelevant-file attribute

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 2:57 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Balázs Gibizer writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm getting more and more confused how the zuul job hierarchy works or >> is supposed to work. > > Hi! > > First, you (or others) may or may not have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cyborg]Dublin PTG Cyborg Nova Interaction Discussion

@melanie yes Cyborg has its meeting room I think :) Room details should be fixed this week or early next week I suppose. So it will be 2:00pm on Tuesday, first thing of buisness after lunch :) On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:20 AM, melanie witt wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2018, at

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cyborg]Dublin PTG Cyborg Nova Interaction Discussion

> On Feb 12, 2018, at 16:06, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > Let's settle on Tuesday afternoon session then, thanks a lot :) Do we have a proposed time and place for the session already? I checked the cyborg etherpad [1] and it looks like we’re thinking 2:00pm on Tuesday. Do we

[openstack-dev] [ptg][congress] Congress Rocky brainstorming & planning

Hi all, In lieu of planning sessions at the PTG, let's have asynchronous brainstorming and a sync-up telecon. (I will still be available at the PTG for discussions). If you're interested, please: 1. Jot down your thoughts and ideas (problems, features, use cases, etc.) in this

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][python3] python3 readiness?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > I guess if RDO has chosen this path then we don't have much choice. This makes it sound like we had a choice to begin with. We've already had a lot of discussions around the topic but we're ultimately stuck between a

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:06 PM Paul Belanger wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:05:34PM +0900, gmann wrote: >> > Hi Infra Team, >> > >> > I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cyborg]Dublin PTG Cyborg Nova Interaction Discussion

+1, I'm interested also. 2018-02-12 23:27 GMT+08:00 Eric Fried : > I'm interested. No date/time preference so far as long as it sticks to > Monday/Tuesday. > > efried > > On 02/12/2018 09:13 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > Hi Nova team, > > > > Cyborg will have ptg sessions on

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:05:34PM +0900, gmann wrote: >> Hi Infra Team, >> >> I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs and their migration part. From >> zuulv3 doc [1], it is clear about migrating the job definition

[openstack-dev] [Zun] Meeting cancel

Hi team, We won't have team meetings in the next two weeks. This is because next week is Lunar New Year and the next next week is the PTG. We will resume the weekly team meeting at Mar 6, 2018. Please find the schedule in: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zun#Meetings . Happy holiday everyone!

[openstack-dev] [acceleration]Cancelation of Cyborg Team meeting on Feb 14th and 21th

Hi Team, Due to Chinese new year and the approaching PTG, let's cancel this week and next week's team meeting. But as usual we will lurk around the IRC channel still, so if you got anything, feel free to shoot on #openstack-cyborg -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard &

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [OVN] L3 traffic

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:19 AM, Assaf Muller wrote: > I'm not aware of plans for OVN to supported distributed SNAT, therefor > a networking node will still be required for the foreseeable future. > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:18 AM, wenran xiao wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][python3] python3 readiness?

2018-02-13 23:53 GMT+01:00 Ben Nemec : > > > On 02/13/2018 01:57 PM, Tom Barron wrote: >> >> Since python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 [1] it is a reasonable >> conjecture that downstream distributions >> will drop support for python 2 between now and then, perhaps

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [neutron] Current containerized neutron agents introduce a significant regression in the dataplane

On 02/13/2018 05:08 PM, Armando M. wrote: On 13 February 2018 at 14:02, Brent Eagles > wrote: Hi, The neutron agents are implemented in such a way that key functionality is implemented in terms of haproxy, dnsmasq, keepalived

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

On 2018-02-14 01:28, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:05:34PM +0900, gmann wrote: >>> Hi Infra Team, >>> >>> I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs and their migration part. From >>> zuulv3 doc [1],

Re: [openstack-dev] [automaton] How to extend automaton?

As far a 1, I'd recommend just use functools.partial or make an object with all the extra stuff u want and have that object provide a __call__ method. As far as 2, you might have to subclass the FSM baseclass and add those into the internal data-structure (same for 3 I think); ie this one @

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] weekly meeting time

Hi Ade, Thank you for proposing this change! I'm in China, and the second time slot works better for me. Regards, Jiong > Message: 35 > Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:17:59 -0500 > From: Ade Lee > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >