On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:24:14PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> On 2017-05-31 17:18:54 +0100 (+0100), Graham Hayes wrote:
>> [...]
>> > Trademark programs are trademark programs - we should have a unified
>> > process for all of them. Le
Hi All,
As most of the QA members are in Open Source Summit, Tokyo, I propose
to cancel tomorrow (01/06/2017 9.00UTC) QA meeting.
-gmann
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-
+1
-gmann
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> our current QA team meeting schedule alternates between 9:00 UTC and 17:00
> UTC.
> The 9:00 meetings is a bit towards the end of the day for out contributors
> in APAC, so I'm proposing to move the meeting to
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Can you file a patch to adjust tox.ini of l2gw to make it the same as the
> others?
Actually it is not just tox, if we need to setup l2gw tests as Tempest
plugin, it needs some of the tests and config options refactoring. I
have not gone deep
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, May 18th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_May_18th_2017_.280900_UTC.29
An
+1. Nice work done by Fanglei and good to have her in team.
-gmann
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I'm very pleased to propose Fanglei Zhu (zhufl) for Tempest core.
>
> Over the past two cycle Fanglei has been steadily contributing to Tempest
> and its
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 22:35 Sean McGinnis wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 01:14:18PM +, Andrea Frittoli wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > Now that this is all in place, I think it's working well and I would
> like
> > > to see it continue that way. IMO, tempest proper should not have
> anything
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 21:57 Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:41 PM Jordan Pittier
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Ghanshyam Mann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In Cinder, there are many features/APIs which are backend specific and
>&
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 21:49 Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:46 AM Ghanshyam Mann
> wrote:
>
>> In Cinder, there are many features/APIs which are backend specific and
>> will return 405 or 501 if same is not implemented on any backend [1].
>> If su
In Cinder, there are many features/APIs which are backend specific and
will return 405 or 501 if same is not implemented on any backend [1].
If such tests are implemented in Tempest, then it will break some gate
where that backend job is voting. like ceph job in glance_store gate.
There been many
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:29 AM Rabi Mishra wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Andrea Frittoli
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear stackers,
>>>
>>> starting in the Liberty cycle Tempest has defined a set of projects which
>>> are in s
Thanks Matt, John.
I would be able to help on policy stuff where needed.
-gmann
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Matt, thanks for pulling that list together.
>
> I have context on most of those, if people would like to take those on.
> I hope to review most of tho
/+spec/policy-docs
..3 https://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/sample_policy.html
>
> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418928/
>
> --Felipe
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ghanshyam Mann [mailto:ghanshyamm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 12:05 A
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, April 20th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_April_20th_2017_.280900_UTC.29
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Jon Bernard wrote:
> * Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> On 4/7/2017 9:43 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Ghanshyam Mann > > <mailto:ghanshyamm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:29 AM, MONTEIRO, FELIPE C wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have a question regarding patrole and release management. Many projects
> like heat or murano have a tempest plugin within their repos, so by
> extension their tempest plugins have releases, as the projects change over
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 4/11/2017 4:29 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> There is tempest tests for compute baremetal GET nodes tests[1]. This
>> tests involve ironic and nova. Ironic to create baremetal nodes and
Hi All,
There is tempest tests for compute baremetal GET nodes tests[1]. This
tests involve ironic and nova. Ironic to create baremetal nodes and
then GET nodes using nova APIs.
Nova only provides GET APIs for baremetal nodes which are already
deprecated [2].
As nova baremetal APIs are deprecated
Thanks. I am not sure these kind of driver specific behavior on APIs
side. This bring up question that should not cinder APIs be consistent
from usage point. In this case[1], create backup API can accept
'container' param and do/don't create pool as per configured driver?
Then have better documenta
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, April 6th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_April_6th_2017_.280900_UTC.29
Hi All,
We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held
Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4.
The proposed agenda and meeting details are here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI
Please feel free to add items to the agenda.
-gmann
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Sridhar Gaddam wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
>
>> On 03/24/2017 06:41 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Tempest is testing SG rule creation and pinging scenario
Hi All,
Tempest is testing SG rule creation and pinging scenario tests with
ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' [0].
In case of ethertype='IPv6', currently neutron accept protocol type
as 'icmp', 'icmpv6' and 'ipv6-icmp' which again seems like duplication of
SG rules bug on neutron side but not s
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, Mar 23rd at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_March_23rd_2017_.280900_UTC.29
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
wrote:
> 2017-03-22 14:32 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli :
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:31 PM Sean McGinnis
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:08:23PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Now we need to update Te
Noted.
Also added redirect link on old wiki
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenStack_University
-gmann
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Ildiko Vancsa
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Due to some issues around the name OpenStack University we unfortunately
> had to pick a new one.
>
> The new name of the
+1.
Yea, Felipe is doing great work.
-gmann
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:28 AM, BARTRA, RICK wrote:
> Felipe has done a tremendous amount of work stabilizing, enabling gates,
> contributing new tests, and extensively reviewing code in the Patrole
> project. In fact, he is the number one contributo
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:45 PM Matt Riedemann
> wrote:
>
> On 3/10/2017 3:02 PM, Andrea Frittoli wrote:
> >
> > We had a couple of sessions related to this topic at the PTG [0][1].
> >
> > We agreed that we want to still maintain integr
6 test_get_volume_absolute_limits
> fails with no admin credentials
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1671256>
>
> 1 reviewing – not sure if it is a valid bug or working as
> designed – Related to resource_cleanup vs teardown (clean after each test
> case).
>
>
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:49 PM Andrea Frittoli
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM Doug Hellmann
>> wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Ghanshyam Mann's message of 2017-03-10 10:55:25 +0900:
>> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:23 AM, L
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 3/10/2017 3:02 PM, Andrea Frittoli wrote:
>
>>
>> We had a couple of sessions related to this topic at the PTG [0][1].
>>
>> We agreed that we want to still maintain integration tests only in
>> Tempest, which means that API micro versio
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Doug Hellmann
> wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Andrea Frittoli's message of 2017-03-09 20:53:54 +:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to figure out what's the best approach to fade out testing of
>> > de
ource_cleanup vs teardown (clean after each test
> case).
>
> #1670693 Tests in
> tempest.api.network.test_routers.RoutersTest don't clean up network
> resources <https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1670693>
>
>
>
> Ple
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, Mar 9th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_March_9th_2017_.280900_UTC.29
A
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:38 PM Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>> I've got a change proposed to disable glance v1 by default in devstack
>> for Pike [1].
>>
>> The glance v1 API has been deprecated for awhile now. Nova started
>> supporting gl
Thanks. +1. i added my list in ethercalc.
Left put scenario tests can be run on periodic and experimental job. IMO on
both ( periodic and experimental) to monitor their status periodically as
well as on particular patch if we need to.
-gmann
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Andrea Frittoli
wrote
Doing gradual refactoring and fixing plugins time to time needs lot of wait
and sync.
That needs:
1. Plugins to switch from current method usage. Plugins to have some other
function or same copy paste code what current scenario base class has.
2. Tempest patch to wait for plugin fix.
3. Plugins to
Yea, there is no doubt we should refactor scenario tests but even those are
internal interface it breaks plugins. We can argue that plugins should not
be using those but before that tempest should have all required
interface/class/helper as stable interface for plugins. which is what
scenario tests
>> [1].
> >> 2) The spec for a new framework which will focus on HA/failover and
> >> destructive testing is no review [2].
> >> 3) The commit for the new repository is on review [3] as well.
> >>
> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396142
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: Hayes, Graham [mailto:graham.ha...@hpe.com]
> Sent: 23 February 2017 03:25
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest Stable plugin interface change
> broke gate
>
> On 21/02/2017 15:25, And
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, Jan 9th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_February_9th_2017_.280900_UTC.29
eam
> and a project team: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1656183,
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/420038/,
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425487/
>
> I have myself no strong opinion on the matter, that why I need a leader
> here :)
>
> Note, there *is* a quest
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
>
>
> 2017-01-29 1:31 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann :
>
>> On 1/27/2017 3:37 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
>>
>>> The patches about validation the filters and sorts for servers API are
>>> merged [0]. But we still have something left [1].
>>>
>>> The left is about
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, Jan 26th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
*
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_January_26th_2017_.280900_UTC
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 1/24/2017 2:05 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately the device tag support in the API was broken in the old
>> Microversion https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1658571, which thanks
>> to Kevin Zheng to find out that.
>>
>> Actually th
Sorry, forgot to mention tempest patch -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424572/1 (but broken cases seems clear
without that patch also)
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
+818011120698
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Ghanshyam Mann
wrote:
> Thanks Alex for writing in details.
>
>
> On Tue,
Thanks Alex for writing in details.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> Unfortunately the device tag support in the API was broken in the old
> Microversion https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1658571, which thanks
> to Kevin Zheng to find out that.
>
> Actually there are two bug
For other failure on "expected_attr" error, we need this to merge -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422323/ on nova side.
-gmann
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriede...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 20 January 2017 12:17
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: R
Thanks Kenichi for all your hardwork and nice leadership.
Its been very good and lot of things we finished under your leadership. You
managed all the activities in a very cool and polite way (Japanese style
:)).
-gmann
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will
Hi All,
First and foremost would like to wish you all a successful 2017 ahead and with
this I'm announcing my PTL candidacy of the Quality Assurance team for the Pike
release cycle.
I am glad to work in OpenStack community and would like to thank all the
contributors who supported me to explor
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
>
>
> 2017-01-17 10:26 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann :
>
>> On 1/16/2017 7:12 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nova,
>>>
>>> I just discovered something interesting, the tag has a limited length,
>>> and in the current implementation, it is 60 in the ta
Or how about just disable the flag which will skip snapshot manage tests
for CI where it should not run.
Flag in Devtsack is TEMPEST_VOLUME_MANAGE_SNAPSHOT which can be set to
False on CI.
I added the same on ceph gate jobs [1] and similarly can be added on CI
side if ok?
..1 https://review.open
Yea, manage snapshot tests should be skipped on ceph backend.
I disabled those tests for *-ceph-* jobs and glance-store will be unblocked
after that merged.
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421073/
There is discussion going on whether to enable the manage snapshot false by
default on devstac
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
wrote:
> 2017-01-12 5:47 GMT-08:00 Brian Rosmaita :
> > On 1/11/17 10:35 PM, GHANSHYAM MANN wrote:
> >
> >> But from meeting logs, it looks like impression was(if am not wrong)
> that
> >> Tempest test[1
k.org/cgit/openstack/tempest/tree/tempest/api/image/v2/test_images.py#n338
.. 2 http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/image/v2/#create-an-image
.. 3
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/specs/api/v2/sharing-image-api-v2.html
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
+818011120698
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 a
Thanks Brian.
Update on meeting time, 12th Jan meeting will be at 0900 UTC.
I just sent mail about meeting invite.
-gmann
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:10 AM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
> Hello QA Team,
>
> There wasn't an agenda for 12 January on the Meetings/QATeamMeeting page
> on the wiki, so I to
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, Jan 12th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
*https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_January_12th_2017_.280900_UTC.29
Thanks Brian for bringing this up, same we been discussing last week on QA
channel and this patch[1] but I completely agree with Matthew opinion here.
There is no doubt that this change(4-valued) are much better and clear than
old one. This makes much defined and clear way of defining the image
vis
016 17:30
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] Which service is using port
> 8778?
>
>
>
> Le 20/12/2016 09:12, Sylvain Bauza a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Le 20/12/2016 07:31, G
Changing placement API port to 8780 [1], hope this is not being used by any
services.
But I am not sure how to check all used port currently as wiki does not seems
to have all.
.. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/412770/
-gmann
> -Original Message-
> From: Ghanshya
Yes, it seems placement API using it [1]
> 1. Recent changes to tempest is breaking our plugin. This is being
>fixed.
Tempest patch should fix issue but port issue blocking that[2]
For port think, I think we can change the placement API port to something else.
I will propose and we can get u
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, Dec 15th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_December_15th_2016_.280900_UTC.2
Hi All,
Recently all gate heat gate jobs were switched to use heat devstack plugin
and heat code was removed from devstack tree.
During that tempest layer 4 job is missed and blocked the tempest gate[1].
Also another heat job had issue for enabling plugin [2].
Fixes are up for both job fix, hope
Not Core but would like to vote +1 for him. Nice review always.
Thanks
gmann
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> I'm proposing that we add Stephen Finucane to the nova-core team. Stephen
> has been involved with nova for at least around a year now, maybe longer,
> my abili
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
wrote:
> 2016-12-02 5:39 GMT-08:00 Masayuki Igawa :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >> On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> >>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> Hi QA-team,
>
> In the big-
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
Thursday, Dec 1st at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_December_1st_2016_.280900_UTC.29
Hi,
This is ssh timeout issue happened. I saw many other bugs also related to ssh
timeout. There are many other tests doing ssh, all those are passing? And does
this tests fail consistently ? (As this tests is not failing on gate)
I will suggest to log this as qa bug and provide more log informa
Thanks a lot alaski for your incredible contribution in Nova. You were a great
learning guide and mentor.
Very best of luck for your new responsibility and hoping to work together in
community again.
Thanks & Regards,
gmann
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Laski [mailto:and...@lasc
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday,
Nov 17th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_November_17th_2016_.280900_
Thanks Kenichi.
It looks fine for me just thinking it would be good if OpenStack projects (few
core one) can be shown under BAT where BAT looks flying over those projects.
Anyways I have given feedback on the link.
Thanks & Regards,
Ghanshyam Mann
M : +81-80-1112-0698
From: Omichi, Ken
Hello everyone,
Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday,
Oct 20th at 9:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for the meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_October_20th_2016_.280900_U
I like os-faults library which can provide the abstraction over different
destructive actions like reboot/poweroff node etc.
But not much clear about Stepler that what all tests it will contain. Tempest
do have scenario tests which can hit the production env with significant way of
testing scen
do not prefer of adding the automapping in tempest side.
[1] will fix the issue and unblock the sahara tests. And I saw sahara plugin
is also branchless so should be ok with just this patch ?
..1 - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385701/
Thanks & Regards,
Ghanshyam Mann
> -O
.280900_UTC.29
Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda.
To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next
meeting will be at:
04:00 EST
18:00 JST
18:30 ACST
11:00 CEST
04:00 CDT
02:00 PDT
Thanks & Regards,
Ghanshyam
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Laski [mailto:and...@lascii.com]
> Sent: 04 August 2016 22:18
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016, at 08:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> > On 08/03/2016
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
> Sent: 27 July 2016 02:36
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next steps for proxy API deprecation
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 01:21:53PM -0
.280900_UTC.29
Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda.
To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next
meeting will be at:
04:00 EST
18:00 JST
18:30 ACST
11:00 CEST
04:00 CDT
02:00 PDT
Thanks & Regards,
Ghanshyam
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 09:55:33PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> There are several changes in Tempest right now trying to add response schema
>> validation for the 2.26 microversion which added server tags to the server
>> GET response.
Thanks Matt for bringing this up.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> There are several changes in Tempest right now trying to add response schema
> validation for the 2.26 microversion which added server tags to the server
> GET response. This is needed for anything testin
.280900_UTC.29
Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda.
Sorry for delay in mail.
To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the next
meeting will be at:
04:00 EST
18:00 JST
18:30 ACST
11:00 CEST
04:00 CDT
02:00 PDT
Thanks & Regards,
Ghanshyam
aster/tempest/api/compute/keypairs/test_keypairs.py#L22
3 ..
https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/compute/admin/test_keypairs_v210.py
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
> __
> ___
.29
Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda.
To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the
next meeting will be at:
04:00 EST
18:00 JST
18:30 ACST
11:00 CEST
04:00 CDT
02:00 PDT
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:19:54PM -0700, Chris Hoge wrote:
>>
>> > On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Matthew Treinish
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:57:05AM -0700, Chris Hoge wrote:
>> >> Last year, in response to Nova mic
Big +1 for that which makes pre-provisioned cred testing more thoroughly.
And at the end we should divide the existing jobs among dynamic and
pre-provisioned account so that we would not leave any of them less tested.
Thanks
gmann
From: Andrea Frittoli [mailto:andrea.fritt...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15
Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda.
To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the
next meeting will be at:
04:00 EST
18:00 JST
18:30 ACST
11:00 CEST
04:00 CDT
02:00 PDT
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
+1, That make sense.
Also as Ceilometer and Aodh will be running tests from plugin, I have
initiated patch to remove those from Tempest.
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304992/
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
+818011120698
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2
refer configuration in detail-
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/configuration.html
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Anusha Ramineni wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> Yes, tempest can be run outside devstack deployments. Please check the
> README in https://git
.280900_UTC.29
Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda.
To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the
next meeting will be at:
04:00 EST
18:00 JST
18:30 ACST
11:00 CEST
04:00 CDT
02:00 PDT
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Shashi Kant
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I am newbie for openstack development and trying to understand the flow
> using code base.
>
> As the code base is very huge need your support to understand it
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:26:13PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>> During the Nova API meeting we had some conversations about priorities,
>> but this feels like the thing where a mailing list conversation is more
>> inclusive to get agreement
tempest patch.
..[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/299830/1
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On 3/30/2016 9:14 PM, GHANSHYAM MANN wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Matt Riedemann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>&
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On 3/30/2016 8:20 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/30/2016 7:56 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/30/2016 7:38 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/25/2016 5:31 AM, Takashi Natsume wrote:
>
>
.280900_UTC.29
Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda.
To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the
next meeting will be at:
04:00 EST
18:00 JST
18:30 ACST
11:00 CEST
04:00 CDT
02:00 PDT
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
redirect API services at top level top and do
what all conversion, consume difference etc.
[1] https://github.com/aviator/aviator
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:58 PM, zs wrote:
> Hi Gordon,
>
> Thank you for your suggestion.
>
> I think jacket is different
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Kairat Kushaev wrote:
>
> Also curious about this. It seems weird to separate the 'positive' and
> the 'negative' ones, assuming those patches are mostly contributed by
> the same group of developers.
>
>
> Yeah, agree. This approach leads to situation when I nee
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> 2016-03-17 4:05 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli :
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:57 AM Ken'ichi Ohmichi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2016-03-16 19:41 GMT-07:00 Jim Rollenhagen :
>>> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:20:11PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>>> >>
Thanks a lot John for great leadership and all achievements. You have
been very encouraging and helpful always.
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 4:22 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been greatly rewarding serving you all as Nova PTL over the
> Liberty and Mita
Thanks Matt for your great leadership and hardwork around QA world.
It has been great working in your leadership and provided a smooth &
cool environment during
those period.
There lot of key things we achieved and with diversity of ideas. You
have been always very active
and present to help all.
.280900_UTC.29
Anyone is welcome to add an item to the agenda.
To help people figure out what time 9:00 UTC is in other timezones the
next meeting will be at:
04:00 EST
18:00 JST
18:30 ACST
11:00 CEST
04:00 CDT
02:00 PDT
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
+1 Sounds good to separate those to different repo.
Regards
Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:21:53AM +0100, Koderer, Marc wrote:
>> I know that there are folks around that are using it.
>> +1 to move it to
201 - 300 of 352 matches
Mail list logo
