Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Not rooting for any approach here, just want to add a bit of factors which might play a role when deciding which way to go: A) Performance matters, we should be improving simplicity and speed of deployments rather than making it heavier. If the deployment time and resource consumption is not

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images into right place at right time

2015-04-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
thing that you're talking about, but it might be a step in that direction. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173645/ On 04/17/2015 09:50 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi All, at the moment we are building discovery, deploy and overcloud images all at once. Then we face user to deal with uploading all

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images into right place at right time

2015-04-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi All, at the moment we are building discovery, deploy and overcloud images all at once. Then we face user to deal with uploading all images at one step. User should not be exposed to discovery/deploy images. This should happen automatically for the user during undercloud installation as

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images into right place at right time

2015-04-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
. Expect that it is standard glance functionality. -Original Message- From: Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 8:51 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images into right place

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Separate horizon and openstack_dashboard

2014-11-14 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 11/11/14 09:30, Jiri Tomasek wrote: On 11/10/2014 12:19 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:13:48PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: Hi, tl;dr: how to progreed in separating horizon and openstack_dashboard About a year ago now we agreed, it makes sense to separate horizon and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] proposal: alternating weekly meeting time [doodle poll created]

2014-11-14 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 12/11/14 02:45, Richard Jones wrote: I have set up a doodle poll to let folk enter their preferred times. It's in UTC/GMT (/London time, because doodle) so use something like http://everytimezone.com/ to figure that out :) https://doodle.com/47h3f35nad62ncnf Richard Quick Question:

[openstack-dev] [UX] IRC Meeting Monday, July 21

2014-07-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hello folks, I apologize that I missed the previous meeting due to some urgency. I wanted to ask Liz to handle the meeting for me but she was not around (vacation). I hope you at least managed to chat a bit about ongoing stuff anyway. Next week (July 28) I am not around, but I will ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Horizon] [UX] Wireframes for Node Management - Juno

2014-07-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Wan, thanks for great notes. My response is inline: On 2014/15/07 23:19, Wan-yen Hsu wrote: The Register Nodes panel uses IPMI user and IPMI Password. However, not all Ironic drivers use IPMI, for instance, some Ironic drivers will use iLO or other BMC interfaces instead of IPMI. I would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Horizon] [UX] Wireframes for Node Management - Juno

2014-07-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/15/07 20:29, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-07-15 07:15:12 +: On 2014/10/07 22:19, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-07-09 07:51:56 +: Hey folks, after few rounds of reviews and feedbacks, I am sending

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Horizon] [UX] Wireframes for Node Management - Juno

2014-07-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/07 22:19, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-07-09 07:51:56 +: Hey folks, after few rounds of reviews and feedbacks, I am sending wireframes, which are ready for implementation in Juno:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Horizon] [UX] Wireframes for Node Management - Juno

2014-07-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Devananda, thank you for your great feedback and notes. Few reactions follow inline: On 2014/10/07 21:29, Devananda van der Veen wrote: Awesome! Glad to see the progress since the design summit. Some comments: - slide 1 shows some driver-specific input fields. We have work in progress to

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Heat] [mid-cycle] Red Hat hosted dinner on Wednesday + food restrictions

2014-07-14 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Dear all, Red Hat is happy to host a dinner during TripleO/Heat mid-cycle which should be held on Wednesday, July 23rd. I would like to invite each attendee of the meetup and ask you to fill yourselves into the relevant section at the end of the following etherpad by the end of Wednesday

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Horizon] [UX] Wireframes for Node Management - Juno

2014-07-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey folks, after few rounds of reviews and feedbacks, I am sending wireframes, which are ready for implementation in Juno: http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/juno/2014-07-09_nodes-ui_juno.pdf Let me know in case of any questions. Cheers -- Jarda

[openstack-dev] [TripleO [Horizon] [UX] Wireframes for Tuskar - Juno

2014-07-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey folks, after few rounds of reviews and feedbacks, I am sending wireframes, which are ready for implementation in Juno: http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/juno/2014-07-09_tuskar-ui_juno.pdf Let me know in case of any questions. Cheers -- Jarda

[openstack-dev] [UX] Meeting Reminder - July 7, 17:00 UTC

2014-07-04 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi UXers, this is a reminder that our next regular IRC meeting is happening on Monday, July 7th at 17:00 UTC at #openstack-meeting-3. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/UX Feel free to add topics which you are interested in. See you all there -- Jarda

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Heat] Reminder: Mid-cycle Meetup - Attendance Confirmation

2014-06-25 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Thanks a lot for your help. Just a side note - we need to fill in the number of requested rooms, so that we don't get charged for extra cost - we have a group discount price. So for everybody, please, go forward and book your room here: http://tinyurl.com/redhat-marriott -- Jarda On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Quick Survey: Horizon Mid-Cycle Meetup

2014-06-20 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/19/06 09:58, Matthias Runge wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Jaromir Coufal wrote: My quick questions are: * Who would be interested (and able) to get to the meeting? * What topics do we want to discuss? https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-juno-meetup Thanks

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Quick Survey: Horizon Mid-Cycle Meetup

2014-06-18 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hello folks, there were few discussions about meeting during the cycle and discuss ongoing issues, progress and next steps of bigger topics. As long as it is pretty late announcement, I don't think (and I guess we agreed) that it doesn't worth to organize a special event just for Horizon.

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Heat] Reminder: Mid-cycle Meetup - Attendance Confirmation

2014-06-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi all, I would like to remind you to sign up for mid-cycle meetup which is happening July 21-25 in Raleigh: * https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-midcycle-meetup We need number of participants as soon as possible so that we can ask for group discount at the hotel. Also if we don't get

[openstack-dev] [UX] Meeting Reminder - Jun 18th, 14:30 UTC

2014-06-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi UXers, this is a reminder that our next regular IRC meeting is happening tomorrow (Wednesday) June 18th at 14:30 UTC at #openstack-meeting-3. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/UX Feel free to add topics which you are interested in. See you all tomorrow -- Jarda

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Name proposals

2014-06-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hm, strange. I have contributed in Icehouse but didn't get the e-mail fro voting. I wanted to vote from the link which you provided but it didn't work for me - you already voted from given key. Can anybody help? Thanks -- Jarda On 2014/10/06 21:18, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: Hello

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO Mid-Cycle Meetup - Final Dates

2014-06-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hello folks, I am happy to announce, that based on previous etherpad gathering, mails and discussions, on the weekly meeting we confirmed final dates for TripleO mid-cycle meetup: July 21-25 (Monday-Friday) Red Hat office, Raleigh, North Carolina I will be working on another

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup

2014-06-10 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/06 10:25, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-06-08 16:44:58 -0700: Hi, it looks that there is no more activity on the survey for mid-cycle dates so I went forward to evaluate it. I created a table view into the etherpad [0] and results are following:

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup

2014-06-08 Thread Jaromir Coufal
and proceed forward with the organization for the meetup? Thanks for all the interest -- Jarda [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-midcycle-meetup On 2014/28/05 13:05, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi to all, after previous TripleO Ironic mid-cycle meetup, which I believe was beneficial

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup

2014-06-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
before or on July the 25th - and I'm going to put that in the etherpad now :0 -Rob On 3 June 2014 04:51, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 05/30/2014 06:58 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2014/30/05 10:00, Thomas Spatzier wrote: Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 29/05/2014 20:57:10

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Adding Tuskar to weekly IRC meetings agenda

2014-06-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/05 22:37, James Polley wrote: On 30 May 2014, at 8:13 pm, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, I would like to propose to add Tuskar as a permanent topic to the agenda for our weekly IRC meetings. It is an official TripleO's project, there happening quite a lot

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Adding Tuskar to weekly IRC meetings agenda

2014-05-30 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi All, I would like to propose to add Tuskar as a permanent topic to the agenda for our weekly IRC meetings. It is an official TripleO's project, there happening quite a lot around it and we are targeting for Juno to have something solid. So I think that it is important for us to regularly

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleO] Should #tuskar business be conducted in the #tripleo channel?

2014-05-30 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/05 02:08, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: As I was reviewing this patch today: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96160/ It occurred to me that the tuskar project is part of the tripleo program:

[openstack-dev] [UX] Reminder - UX initial meeting starts on Monday

2014-05-30 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi UXers, I just wanted to remind all, that on Monday June 2, 2014 at 1700 UTC we are starting with OpenStack UX meetings (#openstack-meeting-3). More details: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/UX I'd like to ask all participants if you could write your time zones here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] [Nova] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup

2014-05-30 Thread Jaromir Coufal
. That said, I'll try to make the TripleO sprint as well -- assuming the dates don't overlap. Cheers, Devananda On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com mailto:jcou...@redhat.com wrote: Hi to all, after previous TripleO Ironic mid-cycle meetup, which I believe

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup

2014-05-30 Thread Jaromir Coufal
, Devananda On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote: Hi to all, after previous TripleO Ironic mid-cycle meetup, which I believe was beneficial for all, I would like to suggest that we meet again in the middle of Juno cycle to discuss current progress

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup

2014-05-30 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/05 10:00, Thomas Spatzier wrote: Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 29/05/2014 20:57:10: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 29/05/2014 20:59 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup snip

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] [Ironic] [Ceilometer] [Horizon] [TripleO] Nodes Management UI - designs

2014-05-29 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey Mainn, mostly it is driven by following requirements: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-ui plus what you already know from Tuskar point of view - which is simply monitoring, monitoring, monitoring :) Hope it helps -- Jarda On 2014/29/05 05:51, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hi Jarda,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup

2014-05-29 Thread Jaromir Coufal
not sure how much of a problem this is. On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com mailto:jcou...@redhat.com wrote: Hi to all, after previous TripleO Ironic mid-cycle meetup, which I believe was beneficial for all, I would like to suggest that we meet again

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup

2014-05-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi to all, after previous TripleO Ironic mid-cycle meetup, which I believe was beneficial for all, I would like to suggest that we meet again in the middle of Juno cycle to discuss current progress, blockers, next steps and of course get some beer all together :) Last time, TripleO and

[openstack-dev] [UX] [Ironic] [Ceilometer] [Horizon] [TripleO] Nodes Management UI - designs

2014-05-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi All, There is a lot of tags in the subject of this e-mail but believe me that all listed projects (and even more) are relevant for the designs which I am sending out. Nodes management section in Horizon is being expected for a while and finally I am sharing the results of designing

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] Initial kick-off IRC meeting

2014-05-24 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/23/05 16:41, Jason Rist wrote: Hi Jarda - How long do you expect the meeting to last? Thanks! Hey Jason, I expect similar as other projects have: 30 - 60 min. We have one hour slot but it depends on the number of topics on agenda. -- Jarda

[openstack-dev] [UX] Initial kick-off IRC meeting

2014-05-23 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Dear UXers, I am happy with your interest in regular OpenStack UX IRC meetings. Based on the poll (http://doodle.com/3m29dkn3ef2em5in), there are few slots which fit majority of interested people. Unfortunately few other teams took empty slots in the meantime so I had to pick first free slot

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] Initial kick-off IRC meeting

2014-05-23 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Apologies, the time was already in conflict with other meetings. But I managed to find a slot for the one on Monday, so the kick-off meeting will be: * Monday, June 2, 2014 at 17000 UTC * openstack-meeting-3 One more time apologies for this change -- Jarda On 2014/23/05 12:58, Jaromir Coufal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [UX] Is there horizon implementation for ironic

2014-05-20 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi, I am currently improving UI designs for node management via Ironic based on the feedback from OpenStack Summit. In the Infrastructure dashboard, there are basic views for nodes, but at this moment it is handled via nova-baremetal (when we implemented these views, Ironic was not ready

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] OpenStack UX - IRC meeting

2014-05-19 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hello everybody interested in UX, for one more time, I am reminding that there is ongoing survey for times which will work for you regarding regular OpenStack UX IRC meetings: http://doodle.com/3m29dkn3ef2em5in Cheers -- Jarda On 2014/06/05 17:27, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hello UX folks, I

[openstack-dev] [UX] OpenStack UX - IRC meeting

2014-05-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hello UX folks, I am following the initial discussion about tools proposal. Everybody blessed UX IRC meetings so I am starting an initiative to organize them. At this moment, I would like to ask everybody interested in the meeting to participate in a survey and mark times which will work for

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] Proposed tools and workflows for OpenStack User Experience contributors

2014-04-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Thanks all for great feedback, I will try to do a short summary: Wiki Wiki page is obvious and easy consensus for us. It should contain all important information about UX, such as how to contribute, where to go to start, various links, etc. Mailing list - [UX] ---

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] User Experience cross-project sessions at Summit

2014-04-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey Liz, thank you very much for taking a time, proposing and covering this agenda. It looks very good and I am happy that we got two slots for UX discussions. I agree with Thierry that we should definitely cover as much UX areas as possible. Therefore I would like to encourage people from

[openstack-dev] [UX] Proposed tools and workflows for OpenStack User Experience contributors

2014-04-23 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Dear OpenStack UX community and everybody else who is interested in OpenStack's user experience, When there is more contributors appearing in time, I would like us to establish a formal process of how the UX work should be organized. Therefore I am suggesting a few tools below for us to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][sahara] Merging Sahara-UI Dashboard code into horizon

2014-04-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey Chad, thank you very much for starting this thread. Let me start with short introduction to my thoughts about OpenStack Dashboard's direction and our latest work there. I am working towards a higher goal of having the OpenStack UI a stable, simple and coherent story for our end users.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][design] review based conceptual design process

2014-04-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/15/04 23:15, James Slagle wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well - it certainly addresses: - making design work visible - being able to tell who has had input -

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/04 19:40, Nachi Ueno wrote: Hi Jarda Congratulations This release and the demo is super awesome!! Do you have any instruction to install this one? Thank you, Nachi! look at Ladislav's response he posted our guideline for installation. If you have any problems, let us know on

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/04 19:40, Nachi Ueno wrote: Hi Jarda Congratulations This release and the demo is super awesome!! Do you have any instruction to install this one? Thank you, Nachi! look at Ladislav's response he posted our guideline for installation. If you have any problems, let us know on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Demo of current state of Tuskar-UI

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/04 22:55, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 April 2014 01:54, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote: Hello OpenStackers, I would like to share with you non-narrated demo of current version of 'Tuskar-UI' project, which is very close to Icehouse release (one or two more patches to come

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/11/04 10:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Dear Stackers, I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged branch 0.1.0 for Icehouse release [0]. I put together a narrated demo of all included features [1]. You can find one

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Jarda, Thanks a lot for your reply. Unfortunately, these instructions aren't very useful if you want to do an installation based on packages. Something like: git clone https://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-incubator $TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-incubator/scripts/devtest.sh --trash-my-machine

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-10 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Dear Stackers, I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged branch 0.1.0 for Icehouse release [0]. I put together a narrated demo of all included features [1]. You can find one manual part in the whole workflow - cloud initialization. There is ongoing work on

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Demo of current state of Tuskar-UI

2014-04-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hello OpenStackers, I would like to share with you non-narrated demo of current version of 'Tuskar-UI' project, which is very close to Icehouse release (one or two more patches to come in). Tuskar-UI is a user interface based on TripleO approach which allows user to register nodes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Demo of current state of Tuskar-UI

2014-04-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/09/04 16:31, mar...@redhat.com wrote: Jarda thanks this was great to watch - seems a lot of things have been fixed/tweaked in last couple weeks. Is everything running from current master branches? marios Yes, everything what you see is currently in the master branch (last changes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar][TripleO] Tuskar Planning for Juno

2014-04-08 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/07/04 15:36, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hi all, One of the topics of discussion during the TripleO midcycle meetup a few weeks ago was the direction we'd like to take Tuskar during Juno. Based on the ideas presented there, we've created a tentative list of items we'd like to address:

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] reviewer update march [additional cores]

2014-04-08 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/08/04 01:50, Robert Collins wrote: tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose: bnemec greghaynes jdon jdon - jdob +1 for all the folks. -- Jarda On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote: Hi +1 for your proposed -core changes. Re your question about whether we should

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] reviewer update march

2014-04-08 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/03/04 13:02, Robert Collins wrote: Getting back in the swing of things... Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] Searching for a new name for Tuskar UI

2014-03-31 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/27/03 19:04, Jiří Stránský wrote: On 27.3.2014 18:21, Dougal Matthews wrote: [snip] As a side, but related note, I think we should rename the Tuskar client to whatever name the Tuskar UI gets called. The client will eventually have feature parity with the UI and thus will have the

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] Searching for a new name for Tuskar UI

2014-03-27 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi OpenStackers, User interface which is managing the OpenStack Infrastructure is currently named Tuskar-UI because of historical reasons. Tuskar itself is a small service, which is giving logic into generating and managing Heat templates and helps user to model and manage his deployment. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Nominating Radomir Dopieralski to Horizon Core

2014-03-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/05/03 23:36, Lyle, David wrote: I'd like to nominate Radomir Dopieralski to Horizon Core. I find his reviews very insightful and more importantly have come to rely on their quality. He has contributed to several areas in Horizon and he understands the code base well. Radomir is also

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Tomas, thanks for the questions, I am replying inline. On 2014/05/02 11:19, Tomas Sedovic wrote: On 05/02/14 03:58, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi to everybody, based on the feedback from last week [0] I incorporated changes in the wireframes so that we keep them up to date with latest

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
/2014 08:41 AM, Hugh O. Brock wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/05/02 15:27, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hi, In parallel to Jarda's updated wireframes, and based on various discussions over the past weeks, here are the updated Tuskar requirements for Icehouse: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/TuskarIcehouseRequirements Any feedback is

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] RFC - Suggestion for switching from Less to Sass (Bootstrap 3 Sass support)

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Dear Horizoners, in last days there were couple of interesting discussions about updating to Bootstrap 3. In this e-mail, I would love to give a small summary and propose a solution for us. As Bootstrap was heavily dependent on Less, when we got rid of node.js we started to use lesscpy.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-04 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/03/02 12:23, Tomas Sedovic wrote: My apologies for firing this off and then hiding under the FOSDEM rock. In light of the points raised by Devananda and Robert, I no longer think fiddling with the scheduler is the way to go. Note this was never intended to break/confuse all TripleO

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-04 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/03/02 00:21, Robert Collins wrote: [snip] However me and Robert, we look to have different opinions on what 'homogeneous' means in our context. I think we should clarify that. So I think my point is more this: - either this iteration is entirely limited to homogeneous hardware, in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-04 Thread Jaromir Coufal
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2fv6vebFhM On 2014/16/01 01:50, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-16_tripleo-ui

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/01 12:59, Ladislav Smola wrote: On 01/30/2014 12:39 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote: On 01/30/2014 11:26 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote: [snip] I am for implementing support for Heterogeneous hardware properly, lifeless should post what he recommends soon, so I would rather discuss that. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/01 19:29, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Wouldn't lying about the hardware specs when registering nodes be problematic for upgrades? Users would have to re-register their nodes. +1 for problematic area here One reason why a custom filter feels attractive is that it provides us with a clear

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/01 23:33, Devananda van der Veen wrote: I was responding based on Treat similar hardware configuration as equal. When there is a very minor difference in hardware (eg, 1TB vs 1.1TB disks), enrolling them with the same spec (1TB disk) is sufficient to solve all these issues and mask

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/01 21:28, Robert Collins wrote: On 30 January 2014 23:26, Tomas Sedovic tsedo...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, I've seen some confusion regarding the homogenous hardware support as the first step for the tripleo UI. I think it's time to make sure we're all on the same page. Here's what

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/31/01 22:03, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: So after reading the replies on this thread, it seems like I (and others advocating a custom scheduler) may have overthought things a bit. The reason this route was suggested was because of conflicting goals for Icehouse: a) homogeneous nodes (to

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Configuration in the UI

2014-01-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi folks, based on overcloud.yaml file (thanks Rob for pointing me there), I put together attributes for deployment configuration which should appear in the UI. Can I ask for a help, to review the list if it is accurate and if not to correct it?

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon]

2014-01-27 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Awesome, thanks a lot for setting this up, David! -- Jarda On 2014/26/01 02:10, Lyle, David wrote: With meeting logging now available in #openstack-meeting-3, the official Horizon meeting time is now Tuesdays at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3. Looking forward to seeing all Horizon folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-27 Thread Jaromir Coufal
for this suggestion, if we don't get to agreement of majority by the end of the week, I would call for voting starting next week. Thanks -- Jarda On 2014/21/01 15:19, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-23 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/22/01 19:46, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: - Original Message - Oh dear user... :) I'll step a little bit back. We need to agree if we want to name concepts one way in the background and other way in the UI for user (did we already agree on this point?). We all know pros and cons.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/22/01 00:56, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hiya - Resource is actually a Heat term that corresponds to what we're deploying within the Overcloud Stack - i.e., if we specify that we want an Overcloud with 1 Controller and 3 Compute, Heat will create a Stack that contains 1 Controller and 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/22/01 00:56, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hiya - Resource is actually a Heat term that corresponds to what we're deploying within the Overcloud Stack - i.e., if we specify that we want an Overcloud with 1 Controller and 3 Compute, Heat will create a Stack that contains 1 Controller and 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/22/01 10:00, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2014/22/01 00:56, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hiya - Resource is actually a Heat term that corresponds to what we're deploying within the Overcloud Stack - i.e., if we specify that we want an Overcloud with 1 Controller and 3 Compute, Heat will create

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Oh dear user... :) I'll step a little bit back. We need to agree if we want to name concepts one way in the background and other way in the UI for user (did we already agree on this point?). We all know pros and cons. And I will still fight for users to get global infrastructure terminology

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey everybody, I am sending updated wireframes. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-22_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf Updates: * p15-18 for down-scaling deployment Any questions are welcome, I am happy to answer them. -- Jarda On 2014/16/01 01:50, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-21 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi folks, when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently known as Role (= Resource Category). Definition: Role is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-20 Thread Jaromir Coufal
huge changes. Cheers -- Jarda On 2014/16/01 01:50, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-16_tripleo-ui

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
:50:00AM +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. http://people.redhat.com/~__jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/__2014-01

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/14/01 21:35, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote: Hi Jaromir, 2014/1/13 Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com mailto:jcou...@redhat.com So what we can do at the moment (until there is some way to specify which node to remove) is to inform user, which nodes were removed in the end

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Docker and TripleO

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/01/01 03:35, Robert Collins wrote: So, we've spoken about using containers on baremetal - e.g. the lxc provider - in the past, and with the [righteously deserved] noise Docker is receiving, I think we need to have a short expectation-setting discussion. Previously we've said that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Domain Model Locations

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Jay, Awesome. I'll just add quick note inline (and sorry for smaller delay): On 2014/09/01 18:22, Jay Dobies wrote: I'm trying to hash out where data will live for Tuskar (both long term and for its Icehouse deliverables). Based on the expectations for Icehouse (a combination of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Domain Model Locations

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/12/01 20:40, Jay Pipes wrote: On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 10:28 -0500, Jay Dobies wrote: So, it's not as simple as it may initially seem :) Ah, I should have been clearer in my statement - my understanding is that we're scrapping concepts like Rack entirely. That was my understanding as

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Editing Nodes

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/15/01 22:33, Jay Dobies wrote: On 01/15/2014 08:07 AM, James Slagle wrote: [snip] I may be misinterpreting, but let me say that I don't think Tuskar should be building images. There's been a fair amount of discussion around a Nova native image building service [1][2]. I'm actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/13/01 13:15, Ladislav Smola wrote: The usage of roles is new metric which doesn't exist. It is the most consumed HW resource (which means if CPU is consumed by 60 % and RAM or disk are less, then the role usage is 60 %). It would be great to have such a metric from Ceilometer. However, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/13/01 12:20, Ladislav Smola wrote: [snip of larger amount of text] - When on the change deployments screen, after making a change but not yet applying it, how are the projected capacity changes calculated? I believe we wanted to make just simple algorithm, that was considering, that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
1) Check for an already deleted server before deleting any. This is related to stack convergence: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-convergence This will allow users to just delete a server they want to delete, and then update the template to reflect reality. 2) Allow resources

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/13/01 16:45, Jiří Stránský wrote: [snip] The other approach is just to scale the number of nodes in a role and let system decide the best match (which node profile is chosen will be decided on the best fit, probably). Hmm i'm not sure i understand - what do you think by best fit here?

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-16_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf Hopefully we are able to deliver described set of features. But if

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Jeff, many thanks for great feedback. Few comments are inline: On 2014/10/01 16:16, Walls, Jeffrey Joel (Cloud OS RD) wrote: Jarda, I love how this is progressing. It will be very nice once it's implemented! The iconography seems to be inconsistent. The ! triangle is used for error

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Jay, thanks for your questions, they are great. I am going to answer inline: On 2014/10/01 17:18, Jay Dobies wrote: Thanks for recording this. A few questions: - I'm guessing the capacity metrics will come from Ceilometer. Will Ceilometer provide the averages for the role or is that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/01 19:02, Dougal Matthews wrote: Hi, Thanks for the wireframes and the walkthrough. Very useful. I've a few comments. - I'd like to echo the comments from the recording about Role I think the term probably isn't specific enough but I don't have a great suggestion. However, this is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/01 21:17, Jay Dobies wrote: Another question: - A Role (sounds like we're moving away from that so I'll call it Resource Category) can have multiple Node Profiles defined (assuming I'm interpretting the + and the tabs in the Create a Role wireframe correctly). But I don't see

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-10 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi everybody, there is first stab of Deployment Management section with future direction (note that it was discussed as a scope for Icehouse). I tried to add functionality in time and break it down to steps. This will help us to focus on one functionality at a time and if we will be in time

  1   2   >