Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-12-09 16:31:37 -0800:
> On 6 December 2013 21:56, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey there,
> >
> > thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current
> > non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially when UI was
>
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:31 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
> We have a bit of a bug in OpenStack today, IMO, in that there is more
> focus on being -core than on being a good effective reviewer. IMO
> that's backwards: the magic switch that lets you set +2 and -2 is a
> responsibility, and that has
On Dec 10, 2013 2:37 AM, "Robert Collins" wrote:
>
> On 6 December 2013 21:56, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey there,
> >
> > thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current
> > non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially when UI
was
> > on hold and I w
On 6 December 2013 21:56, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current
> non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially when UI was
> on hold and I was designing future views. I'll continue working on designs
> much
On 12/06/2013 12:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-12-03 23:12:39 -0800:
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing r
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-12-03 23:12:39 -0800:
> Hi,
> like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
> date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
> time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
> with -core
On 12/06/2013 05:36 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-06 03:22, Ladislav Smola wrote:
On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing w
On 2013-12-06 03:22, Ladislav Smola wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>
> On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Hi,
> like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
> date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
> time, a
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> - Jan Provaznik for removal from -core
> - Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core
> - Martyn Taylor for removal from -core
> - Jiri Tomasek for removal from -core
> - Jamomir Coufal for removal from -core
Four responded and said they'd tr
On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be tru
On 12/05/2013 11:40 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote:
On 12/04/2013 08:12 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
And the 90 day not-active-enough status:
| jprovazn **| 220 5 10 7 177.3% | 2 (
9.1%) |
|jomara ** | 210 2 4 15 1190.5% | 2 (
9.5%) |
|mtaylo
On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
In this mont
On 12/05/2013 03:01 PM, James Slagle wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
On 5 December 2013 06:55, James Slagle wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins
Jan, Jordan, Martyn, Jiri and Jaromir are still actively contributing
to TripleO and OpenStack, but I
On 2013/06/12 00:33, Robert Collins wrote:
There isn't a plan yet, it's just discussion so far. I don't have a
strong feeling of consensus. Lets discuss it more real-time at the
coming TripleO meeting; and I suggest that the Horizon meeting should
also do that, and we can loop back to email with
On 5 December 2013 21:09, Ladislav Smola wrote:
> Hello,
>
> so what is the plan? Tuskar-UI stays in tripleo until tripleo is part of the
> integrated release?
>
> Thanks,
> Ladislav
There isn't a plan yet, it's just discussion so far. I don't have a
strong feeling of consensus. Lets discuss it m
On 5 December 2013 09:12, Keith Basil wrote:
>> This sounds reasonable to me. The code base for TuskarUI is building on
>> Horizon and we are planning on integrating TuskarUI into Horizon once
>> TripleO is part of the integrated release. The review skills and focus for
>> TuskarUI is certai
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 5 December 2013 06:55, James Slagle wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins
>>> Jan, Jordan, Martyn, Jiri and Jaromir are still actively contributing
>>> to TripleO and OpenStack, but I don't think they are tracking /
>>>
On 4.12.2013 08:12, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
In this months
On 12/04/2013 08:12 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
In this mo
On 12/04/2013 08:12 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
And the 90 day not-active-enough status:
| jprovazn **| 220 5 10 7 177.3% |2 ( 9.1%) |
|jomara ** | 210 2 4 15 1190.5% |2 ( 9.5%) |
|mtaylor **| 173 6 0 8 8
Hello,
so what is the plan? Tuskar-UI stays in tripleo until tripleo is part of
the integrated release?
Thanks,
Ladislav
On 12/04/2013 08:44 PM, Lyle, David wrote:
On 5 December 2013 12:10, Robert Collins wrote:
-snip-
That said, perhaps we should review these projects.
Tuskar as an API
Hello,
+1 to core update. There are still enough Tuskar-UI guys in the core
team I think.
Ladislav
On 12/04/2013 08:12 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, a
On Dec 4, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Lyle, David wrote:
> On 5 December 2013 12:10, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> -snip-
>
>>
>> That said, perhaps we should review these projects.
>>
>> Tuskar as an API to drive deployment and ops clearly belongs in
>> TripleO - though we need to keep pushing features ou
On 5 December 2013 12:10, Robert Collins wrote:
-snip-
>
> That said, perhaps we should review these projects.
>
> Tuskar as an API to drive deployment and ops clearly belongs in
> TripleO - though we need to keep pushing features out of it into more
> generalised tools like Heat, Nova and Sol
On 5 December 2013 06:55, James Slagle wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins
>> Jan, Jordan, Martyn, Jiri and Jaromir are still actively contributing
>> to TripleO and OpenStack, but I don't think they are tracking /
>> engaging in the code review discussions enough to stay in -c
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> In this months review:
> - Ghe Rivero for -core
+1. Has been doing very good reviews.
> - Jan Provaznik for removal from -core
> - Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core
> - Martyn Taylor for removal from -core
> - Jiri Tomasek for remo
Hi
On 4 December 2013 07:12, Robert Collins wrote:
> - Ghe Rivero for -core
>
+1
> - Jan Provaznik for removal from -core
> - Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core
> - Martyn Taylor for removal from -core
> - Jiri Tomasek for removal from -core
> - Jamomir Coufal for removal from -core
>
On 04/12/13 12:07 +0100, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
Hi,
As the development of Tuskar-UI somehow stagnated recently, I have been
focusing more on Horizon project lately to get features we need for
Tuskar-UI. I acknowledge that I haven't been paying enough attention and
reviews in TripleO. The stat
Hi,
As the development of Tuskar-UI somehow stagnated recently, I have been
focusing more on Horizon project lately to get features we need for
Tuskar-UI. I acknowledge that I haven't been paying enough attention and
reviews in TripleO. The statistics says it all. Although as the
development
29 matches
Mail list logo
