Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Group-based Policy next steps

2014-09-05 Thread Prasad Vellanki
Sumit Thanks for initiating this and also good discussion today on the IRC. My thoughts are that it is important to make this available to potential users and customers as soon as possible so that we can get the necessary feedback. Considering that the neutron cores and community are battling

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Group-based Policy next steps

2014-09-05 Thread Mandeep Dhami
I agree. Also, as this does not preclude using the incubator when it is ready, this is a good way to start iterating on implementation in parallel with those issues being addressed by the community. In my view, the issues raised around the incubator were significant enough (around packaging,

[openstack-dev] [nova] [feature freeze exception] FFE for libvirt-disk-discard-option

2014-09-05 Thread Bohai (ricky)
Hi, I'd like to ask for a feature freeze exception for blueprint libvirt-disk-discard-option. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112977/ approved spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85556/ blueprint was approved, but its status was changed to Pending Approval because of FF.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 05/09/2014 01:26, Jay Pipes a écrit : On 09/04/2014 10:33 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote: Basically +1 with what Daniel is saying (note that, as mentioned, a side effect of our effort to split out the scheduler will help but not solve this problem). The difference between Dan's proposal and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 05/09/2014 01:22, Michael Still a écrit : On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: [Heavy snipping because of length] The radical (?) solution to the nova core team bottleneck is thus to follow this lead and split the nova virt drivers out into

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Group-based Policy next steps

2014-09-05 Thread Stephen Wong
I agree with Prasad here. There remains lots of unknown about Neutron incubator and its workflow at this point, and the idea of Neutron feature branch is at best in embryonic stage. It seems like among the three options, the most well-defined one is indeed through stackforge. When and if the

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally][iperf] Benchmarking network performance

2014-09-05 Thread masoom alam
Thanks Ajay I corrected this earlier. But facing another problem. Will forward paste in a while. On Friday, September 5, 2014, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) akala...@cisco.com wrote: Sorry there was typo in the patch should be @validation and not @(validation Please change that in vm_perf.py

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Group-based Policy next steps

2014-09-05 Thread Kevin Benton
Tl;dr - Neutron incubator is only a wiki page with many uncertainties. Use StackForge to make progress and re-evaluate when the incubator exists. I also agree that starting out in StackForge as a separate repo is a better first step. In addition to the uncertainty around packaging and other

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

2014-09-05 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 09/04/2014 07:08 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-04 06:01:45 -0700: On 09/04/2014 02:14 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/04/2014 03:08 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, Last Tuesday the TC held the first graduation review for Zaqar. During the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit reloaded

2014-09-05 Thread Thierry Carrez
Eoghan Glynn wrote: Am I missing some compelling advantage of moving all these emergent project-specific meetups to the Friday? One is that due to space limitations, we won't have nearly as many pods as in Atlanta (more like half or a third of them). Without one pod per program, the model

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

2014-09-05 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 09/04/2014 07:42 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: Anyway, not enough to -1 it, but enough to at least say something. .. but I do not want to get into the discussion about software testing here, not the place really. However, I do think it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Keystone] Steps toward Kerberos and Federation

2014-09-05 Thread Marco Fargetta
Hi, I am wondering if the solution I was trying to sketch with the spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96867/13; is not easier to implement and manage then the steps highlated till n.2. Maybe, the spec is not yet there and should be improved (I will abandon or move to Kilo as Marek suggest) but

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:56:04PM -0500, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: Proposal / solution === In the past Nova has spun out its volume layer to form the cinder project. The Neutron project started as

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Brainstorming summit sessions

2014-09-05 Thread Thierry Carrez
Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: Did you have a specific goal/date in mind for when you might start to finalize this list? I am guessing at least after the dust settles on J-3 and possibly even the first RCs but just curious.

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally][iperf] Benchmarking network performance

2014-09-05 Thread masoom alam
http://paste.openstack.org/show/106297/ On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Ajay I corrected this earlier. But facing another problem. Will forward paste in a while. On Friday, September 5, 2014, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) akala...@cisco.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:44:17PM -0600, John Griffith wrote: Just some thoughts and observations I've had regarding this topic in Cinder the past couple of years. I realize this is a Nova thread so hopefully some of this can be applied in a more general context. TLDR: 1. I think moving

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

2014-09-05 Thread Thierry Carrez
Tim Bell wrote: -Original Message- From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] Sent: 04 September 2014 16:59 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting Sean Dague wrote: [...] So,

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally][iperf] Benchmarking network performance

2014-09-05 Thread masoom alam
Please forward ur vmtasks.py file On Friday, September 5, 2014, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com wrote: http://paste.openstack.org/show/106297/ On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','masoom.a...@gmail.com'); wrote: Thanks Ajay I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:57:57PM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: Proposal / solution === In the past Nova has spun out its volume layer to form the cinder project. The Neutron project started as an

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][IPv6] Neighbor Discovery for HA

2014-09-05 Thread Xu Han Peng
Carl, Seem so. I think internal router interface and external gateway port GARP are taken care by keepalived during failover. And if HA is not enable, _send_gratuitous_arp is called to send out GARP. I think we will need to take care IPv6 for both cases since keepalived 1.2.0 support IPv6.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:48:33PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: On 09/04/2014 06:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Position statement == Over the past year I've increasingly come to the conclusion that Nova is heading for (or probably already at) a major crisis. If

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

2014-09-05 Thread Gordon Sim
On 09/04/2014 09:44 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote: Thanks for your comments Gordon. I appreciate where you are coming from and I think we are actually in agreement on a lot of things. I just want to make it clear that from the very beginning of the project the team has tried to communicate (but

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:24:29 +0100 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: - A fairly significant amount of nova code would need to be considered semi-stable API. Certainly everything under nova/virt and any object which is passed in/out of the virt driver API. Changes to such

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Compute agent local VM inspector - potential enhancement

2014-09-05 Thread Rao Dingyuan
Hi folks, Is there anybody working on this? In most of our cloud environments, business networks are isolated from management network. So, we are thinking about making *an agent in guest machine to send metrics to compute node using virtual serial port*. And then, compute node could send

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:57:57 -0700 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: Overall I do think we need to re-think how the review burden is distributed. That being said, this is a nice proposal but I am not sure if it moves the review burden around enough or is the right approach. Do you have

[openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Juno-3 milestone candidates available

2014-09-05 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, We just hit feature freeze[1], so please do not approve changes that add features or new configuration options unless those have been granted a feature freeze exception. This is also string freeze[2], so you should avoid changing translatable strings. If you have to modify a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:54:28PM -0700, Stefano Maffulli wrote: Thanks Daniel for taking the time to write such deep message. Obviously you have thought about this issue for a long time and your opinion comes from deep personal understanding. I'm adding tags for neutron and cinder, as I know

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:31:50PM +0930, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:24:29 +0100 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: - A fairly significant amount of nova code would need to be considered semi-stable API. Certainly everything under nova/virt and any

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] NNN_additional_attribute_mapping

2014-09-05 Thread Alexander V Makarov
Greetings! I think I found a problem in extra attributes handling in LDAP backend. Also I'd like to propose a solution :) There is a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1336769 LDAP additional attribute mappings do not care about model attribute reported by Marcos Lobo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Defining what is a SupportStatus version

2014-09-05 Thread Steven Hardy
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:56:34PM +1000, Angus Salkeld wrote: On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Gauvain Pocentek gauvain.pocen...@objectif-libre.com wrote: Hi, A bit of background: I'm working on the publication of the HOT resources reference on docs.openstack.org.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
On 4 September 2014 23:48, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 06:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Position statement == Over the past year I've increasingly come to the conclusion that Nova is heading for (or probably already at) a major crisis. If steps

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:22:18PM -0500, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: [Heavy snipping because of length] The radical (?) solution to the nova core team bottleneck is thus to follow this lead and split the nova virt

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
On 5 September 2014 00:26, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 10:33 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote: Basically +1 with what Daniel is saying (note that, as mentioned, a side effect of our effort to split out the scheduler will help but not solve this problem). The difference

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:29:43AM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 4 September 2014 23:48, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 06:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: If we ignored gerrit for a moment, is rapid increase in splitting out components the ideal workflow? Would we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/05/2014 06:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:31:50PM +0930, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:24:29 +0100 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: - A fairly significant amount of nova code would need to be considered semi-stable API.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-05 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 09/04/2014 10:25 PM, Solly Ross wrote: Anyway, I think it would be useful to have some sort of page where people could say I'm an SME in X, ask me for reviews and then patch submitters could go and say, oh, I need an someone to review my patch about storage backends, let me ask sross.

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] instance lock and class lock

2014-09-05 Thread Davanum Srinivas
given the code size, a BP may be a over stretch. I'd just file a review + bug -- dims On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Zang MingJie zealot0...@gmail.com wrote: does it require bp or bug report to submit oslo.concurrency patch ? On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Davanum Srinivas

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:00:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/05/2014 06:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:31:50PM +0930, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:24:29 +0100 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: - A fairly significant amount

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE request v2-on-v3-api

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
Patches re-approved. Thanks, John On 5 September 2014 00:24, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: Approved. Michael On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-09-04 20:34 GMT+09:00 Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com: Hi, I'd like to request a

Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware][nova][FFE] vmware-spawn-refactor

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
Yeah, I have been reviewing these, so happy to sponsor them too. Patches have been re-approved. Thanks, John On 5 September 2014 00:23, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: So, that's your three. This exception is approved. Michael On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

2014-09-05 Thread Robert Collins
On 5 September 2014 23:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: I think realistically a self certification process that would have artifacts in a discoverable place. I was thinking something along the lines of a baseball card interface with a short description of the project, a list of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:12:37AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/05/2014 06:40 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: A handy example of this I can think of is the currently granted FFE for serial consoles - consider how much of the code went into the common part vs. the libvirt specific part, I would

[openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE flood gates open

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
Hi, We have now tagged juno-3, so we are good to approve patches for FFE now. Given how much there is to get through the gate, it would be nice to concentrate on FFE code, and higher priority bugs, till we break the back of those merges. Thanks, John

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [feature freeze exception] FFE for libvirt-disk-discard-option

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:28:55AM +, Bohai (ricky) wrote: Hi, I'd like to ask for a feature freeze exception for blueprint libvirt-disk-discard-option. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112977/ approved spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85556/ blueprint was approved, but its

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [feature freeze exception] Feature freeze exception for config-drive-image-property

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
Blueprint re-approved, code re-approved. Thanks, John On 4 September 2014 21:11, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: I'll be the third core here. Approved. @John: can you please remove your -2 from this one? Michael On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] requesting an FFE for SRIOV

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
In the nova-meeting we agreed this gets a FFE, based on previous agreements in nova-meetings. Blueprint is approved for juno-rc1. Thanks, John On 4 September 2014 16:38, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 05:16 PM, Dan Smith wrote: The main sr-iov patches have gone

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/05/2014 07:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:00:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/05/2014 06:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:31:50PM +0930, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:24:29 +0100 Daniel P. Berrange

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE] [nova] Barbican key manager wrapper

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:19:45PM +, Coffman, Joel M. wrote: A major concern about several encryption features within Nova [1, 2] has been the lack of secure key management. To address this concern, work has been underway to integrate these features with Barbican [3], which can be used

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/05/2014 07:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:12:37AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/05/2014 06:40 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: A handy example of this I can think of is the currently granted FFE for serial consoles - consider how much of the code went into the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [feature freeze exception] FFE for libvirt-disk-discard-option

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/05/2014 07:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:28:55AM +, Bohai (ricky) wrote: Hi, I'd like to ask for a feature freeze exception for blueprint libvirt-disk-discard-option. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112977/ approved spec:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [feature freeze exception] FFE for libvirt-disk-discard-option

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/05/2014 07:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:28:55AM +, Bohai (ricky) wrote: Hi, I'd like to ask for a feature freeze exception for blueprint libvirt-disk-discard-option. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112977/ approved spec:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/05/2014 07:39 AM, Robert Collins wrote: On 5 September 2014 23:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: I think realistically a self certification process that would have artifacts in a discoverable place. I was thinking something along the lines of a baseball card interface with a short

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

2014-09-05 Thread Gordon Sim
On 09/04/2014 09:44 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote: Does a Qpid/Rabbit/Kafka provisioning service make sense? Probably. I think something like that would be valuable, especially in conjunction with some application layer proxying and mapping between 'virtual' addresses/endpoints and specific

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:49:04AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/05/2014 07:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:00:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/05/2014 06:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:31:50PM +0930, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE] [nova] Barbican key manager wrapper

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/05/2014 07:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:19:45PM +, Coffman, Joel M. wrote: A major concern about several encryption features within Nova [1, 2] has been the lack of secure key management. To address this concern, work has been underway to integrate

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Thierry Carrez
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: For a long time I've use the LKML 'subsystem maintainers' model as the reference point for ideas. In a more LKML like model, each virt team (or other subsystem team) would have their own separate GIT repo with a complete Nova codebase, where they did they day to day

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Docs plan for Juno

2014-09-05 Thread Swartzlander, Ben
Now that the project is incubated, we should be moving our docs from the openstack wiki to the openstack-manuals project. Rushil Chugh has volunteered to lead this effort so please coordinate any updates to documentation with him (and me). Our goal is to have the updates to openstack-manuals

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-05 Thread Thierry Carrez
Michael Still wrote: We're soon to hit feature freeze, as discussed in Thierry's recent email. I'd like to outline the process for requesting a freeze exception: * your code must already be up for review * your blueprint must have an approved spec * you need three (3)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/05/2014 02:59 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 05/09/2014 01:26, Jay Pipes a écrit : On 09/04/2014 10:33 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote: Basically +1 with what Daniel is saying (note that, as mentioned, a side effect of our effort to split out the scheduler will help but not solve this problem).

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE] [nova] Barbican key manager wrapper

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/05/2014 08:11 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/05/2014 07:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:19:45PM +, Coffman, Joel M. wrote: A major concern about several encryption features within Nova [1, 2] has been the lack of secure key management. To address this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-05 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 05/09/2014 13:05, Nikola Đipanov a écrit : On 09/04/2014 10:25 PM, Solly Ross wrote: Anyway, I think it would be useful to have some sort of page where people could say I'm an SME in X, ask me for reviews and then patch submitters could go and say, oh, I need an someone to review my patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][FFE] websocket-proxy-to-host-security

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:59:07PM -0400, Solly Ross wrote: I would like to request a feature freeze exception for the Websocket Proxy to Host Security. The spec [1] was approved for Nova, and the patches [2] are currently sitting there with one +2 (courtesy of @danpb), with a +1 from

[openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Day, Phil
Hi, I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for server groups. Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti-affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, but without some form of quota control to limit the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [FFE] alternative request for v2-on-v3-api

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/04/2014 07:54 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 23:08:09 +0900 Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I'd like to request FFE for v2.1 API patches. This request is different from Christopher's one. His request is for the approved patches, but this is for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 05/09/2014 14:48, Jay Pipes a écrit : On 09/05/2014 02:59 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 05/09/2014 01:26, Jay Pipes a écrit : On 09/04/2014 10:33 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote: Basically +1 with what Daniel is saying (note that, as mentioned, a side effect of our effort to split out the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

2014-09-05 Thread Nikola Đipanov
Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already sponsored it, and as per [1] cores can sponsor their own FFEs so that's 3. N. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 05/09/2014 12:48, Sean Dague a écrit : On 09/05/2014 03:02 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 05/09/2014 01:22, Michael Still a écrit : On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: [Heavy snipping because of length] The radical (?) solution to the nova core

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

2014-09-05 Thread Gordon Sim
On 09/04/2014 01:14 PM, Sean Dague wrote: https://dague.net/2014/08/26/openstack-as-layers/ Just wanted to say that I found this article very useful indeed and agree with the points you make in it. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/05/2014 08:58 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 05/09/2014 14:48, Jay Pipes a écrit : On 09/05/2014 02:59 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 05/09/2014 01:26, Jay Pipes a écrit : On 09/04/2014 10:33 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote: Basically +1 with what Daniel is saying (note that, as mentioned, a side

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Day, Phil
-Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: 05 September 2014 11:49 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers On 09/05/2014 03:02 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Ahem,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][feature freeze exception] Can I get an exception for AMQP 1.0?

2014-09-05 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm proposing a freeze exception for the oslo.messaging AMQP 1.0 driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75815/ Blueprint:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Docs plan for Juno

2014-09-05 Thread Anne Gentle
Hi Ben, Since manila just entered incubation, the openstack-manuals repo and common documentation will not include it until it is integrated. During incubation we ask you to start documentation in your own repo and identify what will eventually move into common docs. See

[openstack-dev] how to provide tests environments for python things that require C extensions

2014-09-05 Thread Sean Dague
While reviewing this zookeeper service group fix in Nova - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102639/ it was exposed that the zookeeper tests aren't running in infra. The crux of the issue is that zookeeper python modules are C extensions. So you have to either install from packages (which we don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

2014-09-05 Thread Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
2014-09-05 9:09 GMT-03:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net: On 09/05/2014 07:39 AM, Robert Collins wrote: On 5 September 2014 23:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: I think realistically a self certification process that would have artifacts in a discoverable place. I was thinking something

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 05/09/2014 15:11, Jay Pipes a écrit : On 09/05/2014 08:58 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 05/09/2014 14:48, Jay Pipes a écrit : On 09/05/2014 02:59 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 05/09/2014 01:26, Jay Pipes a écrit : On 09/04/2014 10:33 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote: Basically +1 with what Daniel

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Eric Windisch
- Each virt driver project gets its own core team and is responsible for dealing with review, merge release of their codebase. Note, I really do mean *all* virt drivers should be separate. I do not want to see some virt drivers split out and others remain in tree because I feel that

[openstack-dev] [Nova] [FFE] Final Libvirt User Namespaces Patch

2014-09-05 Thread Andrew Melton
Hey Devs, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94915/ This feature is the final patch set for the User Namespace BP (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-lxc-user-namespaces). This is an important feature for libvirt-lxc because

[openstack-dev] [Sahara][FFE] Requesting exception for Swift trust authentication blueprint

2014-09-05 Thread Michael McCune
hey folks, I am requesting an exception for the Swift trust authentication blueprint[1]. This blueprint addresses a security bug in Sahara and represents a significant move towards increased security for Sahara clusters. There are several reviews underway[2] with 1 or 2 more starting today or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [FFE] Final Libvirt User Namespaces Patch

2014-09-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:49:20PM +, Andrew Melton wrote: Hey Devs, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94915/ This feature is the final patch set for the User Namespace BP

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Khanh-Toan Tran
+1 for ServerGroup quotas. It's been a while since this feature is discussed and approved. As a public cloud provider we really want to get ServerGroup into production. However, without quotas it is more harm than gain. Since ServerGroup (and even its novaclient's command) is merged in Icehouse,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/05/2014 06:29 AM, John Garbutt wrote: Scheduler: I think we need to split out the scheduler with a similar level of urgency. We keep blocking features on the split, because we know we don't have the review bandwidth to deal with them. Right now I am talking about a compute related

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] libvirt version_cap, a postmortem

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
On 3 September 2014 21:57, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: Hey The libvirt version_cap debacle continues to come up in conversation and one perception of the whole thing appears to be: A controversial patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Keystone] Steps toward Kerberos and Federation

2014-09-05 Thread Adam Young
On 09/05/2014 04:49 AM, Marco Fargetta wrote: Hi, I am wondering if the solution I was trying to sketch with the spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96867/13; is not easier to implement and manage then the steps highlated till n.2. Maybe, the spec is not yet there and should be improved (I

[openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Coraid CI system

2014-09-05 Thread Mykola Grygoriev
Hi, My name is Mykola Grygoriev and I'm engineer who currently working on deploying 3d party CI for Сoraid Сinder driver. Following instructions on http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requesting-a-service-account asking for adding gerrit CI account (coraid-ci) to the Voting Third-Party CI

[openstack-dev] Status update on the python-openstacksdk project

2014-09-05 Thread Brian Curtin
Hi all, Between recent IRC meetings and the mid-cycle operators meetup, we've heard things ranging from is the SDK project still around to I can't wait for this. I'm Brian Curtin from Rackspace and I'd like to tell you what the python-openstacksdk [0][1] project has been up to lately. After

Re: [openstack-dev] how to provide tests environments for python things that require C extensions

2014-09-05 Thread Monty Taylor
On 09/05/2014 06:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: While reviewing this zookeeper service group fix in Nova - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102639/ it was exposed that the zookeeper tests aren't running in infra. The crux of the issue is that zookeeper python modules are C extensions. So you have to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Coraid CI system

2014-09-05 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Hi Mykola, On 09/05/2014 04:09 PM, Mykola Grygoriev wrote: Hi, My name is Mykola Grygoriev and I'm engineer who currently working on deploying 3d party CI for Сoraid Сinder driver. Great, thanks! Following instructions on

Re: [openstack-dev] how to provide tests environments for python things that require C extensions

2014-09-05 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 09/05/2014 04:21 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 09/05/2014 06:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: While reviewing this zookeeper service group fix in Nova - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102639/ it was exposed that the zookeeper tests aren't running in infra. The crux of the issue is that zookeeper

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally][iperf] Benchmarking network performance

2014-09-05 Thread Ajay Kalambur (akalambu)
You need to apply the other 2 network context patches from the reviews I sent out Ajay Sent from my iPhone On Sep 5, 2014, at 2:25 AM, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.commailto:masoom.a...@gmail.com wrote: http://paste.openstack.org/show/106297/ On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, masoom alam

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Coraid CI system

2014-09-05 Thread Anita Kuno
On 09/05/2014 10:33 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: Hi Mykola, On 09/05/2014 04:09 PM, Mykola Grygoriev wrote: Hi, My name is Mykola Grygoriev and I'm engineer who currently working on deploying 3d party CI for Сoraid Сinder driver. Great, thanks! Following instructions on

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas

2014-09-05 Thread Christopher Yeoh
I'm willing to sponsor this Chris — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for server groups. Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Coraid CI system

2014-09-05 Thread Duncan Thomas
+1 from me (Cinder core) On 5 September 2014 15:09, Mykola Grygoriev mgrygor...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, My name is Mykola Grygoriev and I'm engineer who currently working on deploying 3d party CI for Сoraid Сinder driver. Following instructions on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [FFE] Final Libvirt User Namespaces Patch

2014-09-05 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/05/2014 09:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:49:20PM +, Andrew Melton wrote: Hey Devs, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94915/ This feature is the final patch set for the User Namespace BP

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-driver-numa-placement

2014-09-05 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/05/2014 04:48 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: Quick response as not to hijack the thread: I think we all agree on the benefits of having resources you can turn off and on at will. I don't agree at all. There's no cost whatsoever in turning on a resource. It doesn't need to be extensible.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Status of Neutron at Juno-3

2014-09-05 Thread Robert Kukura
Kyle, Please consider an FFE for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-hierarchical-port-binding. This was discussed extensively at Wednesday's ML2 meeting, where the consensus was that it would be valuable to get this into Juno if possible. The patches have had core reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] how to provide tests environments for python things that require C extensions

2014-09-05 Thread David Shrewsbury
I agree with Flavio. This looks really cool, and I had a very similar idea recently. I'll try to find some time to give this a whirl. -Dave On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/05/2014 04:21 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 09/05/2014 06:32 AM, Sean Dague

[openstack-dev] [Manila]

2014-09-05 Thread Jyoti Ranjan
Which of file system appliances are supported as of today? We are thinking to integrate with our cloud. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Group-based Policy next steps

2014-09-05 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
I can only see the use of a separate project for Group Policy as a tactical and temporary solution. In my opinion, it does not make sense to have the Group Policy as a separate project outside Neutron (unless the new project is aiming to replace Neutron and I do not think anybody is suggesting

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New meeting rotation starting next week

2014-09-05 Thread Kyle Mestery
Just an updated note here. The IPV6 sub-team has moved their meeting time, so I've claimed #openstack-meeting at 1400UTC on Tuesday's for the Neutron team meeting. I'll send a note reminding folks of the change on Monday. Thanks, Kyle On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Kyle Mestery

[openstack-dev] [TripleO]

2014-09-05 Thread Jyoti Ranjan
I deployed a server having three drives using TripleO. How can I know which disk is root disk? I need this information as I have a utility which will format all drives except root disk. Utility is being used for some solution we are developing using machines deployed by TripleO. Regards, Jyoti

  1   2   >