[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.context 2.10.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are glowing to announce the release of: oslo.context 2.10.0: Oslo Context library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.context Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] automaton 1.5.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are jubilant to announce the release of: automaton 1.5.0: Friendly state machines for python. This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/automaton Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.vmware 2.15.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are tickled pink to announce the release of: oslo.vmware 2.15.0: Oslo VMware library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.vmware Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] stevedore 1.18.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are jazzed to announce the release of: stevedore 1.18.0: Manage dynamic plugins for Python applications This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/stevedore Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.middleware 3.20.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are frolicsome to announce the release of: oslo.middleware 3.20.0: Oslo Middleware library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.middleware Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslosphinx 4.8.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are glowing to announce the release of: oslosphinx 4.8.0: OpenStack Sphinx Extensions and Theme This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslosphinx Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.versionedobjects 1.18.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are jubilant to announce the release of: oslo.versionedobjects 1.18.0: Oslo Versioned Objects library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.versionedobjects Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.service 1.17.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are jubilant to announce the release of: oslo.service 1.17.0: oslo.service library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.service Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.messaging 5.11.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are high-spirited to announce the release of: oslo.messaging 5.11.0: Oslo Messaging API This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.messaging Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] debtcollector 1.9.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are grateful to announce the release of: debtcollector 1.9.0: A collection of Python deprecation patterns and strategies that help you collect your technical debt in a non- destructive manner. This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.rootwrap 5.2.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are glowing to announce the release of: oslo.rootwrap 5.2.0: Oslo Rootwrap This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.rootwrap Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.rootwrap

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.cache 1.15.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are frolicsome to announce the release of: oslo.cache 1.15.0: Cache storage for OpenStack projects. This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.cache Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [fwaas] Weekly meeting cancelled on Oct 25th due to the Summit.

2016-10-18 Thread Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)
Hi All: We will cancel the FWaaS meeting next week due to the summit and resume the week after on Nov 1 as usual. Thanks and Safe travels. Sridar __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [senlin]Cancelling weekly IRC meeting for Oct. 25th

2016-10-18 Thread Yanyan Hu
Hi, guys, the Senlin IRC meeting on Oct. 25th will be cancelled for majority of the team will be in travel next week for Barcelona summit. Thanks and have a good trip. -- Best regards, Yanyan __ OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [nova] Deprecate VMware CI that uses nova-network

2016-10-18 Thread Sihan Wang
Hi, We have added Nova upstream CI to use NSX, currently it is non-voting. After we test its stability, we will replace the novanet one. Thanks Sihan __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Meeting this week cancelled

2016-10-18 Thread Richard Jones
Oh, and the meeting next week (26th) will also not happen due to the summit. Richard On 19 October 2016 at 14:22, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi folks, > > With the summit almost upon us, and no agenda items or significant > notices, I'm cancelling this week's team

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.utils 3.17.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are mirthful to announce the release of: oslo.utils 3.17.0: Oslo Utility library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.utils Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.utils

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.config 3.18.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are tickled pink to announce the release of: oslo.config 3.18.0: Oslo Configuration API This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.config Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.concurrency 3.15.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are jazzed to announce the release of: oslo.concurrency 3.15.0: Oslo Concurrency library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.concurrency Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.privsep 1.14.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are frolicsome to announce the release of: oslo.privsep 1.14.0: OpenStack library for privilege separation This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.privsep Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslotest 2.11.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are jubilant to announce the release of: oslotest 2.11.0: Oslo test framework This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslotest Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslotest Please

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Meeting this week cancelled

2016-10-18 Thread Richard Jones
Hi folks, With the summit almost upon us, and no agenda items or significant notices, I'm cancelling this week's team meeting (was scheduled for 2016/10/19 20:00UTC). Cheers, Richard __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][CI] Etcd server setuped in devstack script can not be reached in CI unit tests

2016-10-18 Thread Clark Boylan
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016, at 07:08 PM, Wenzhi Yu (yuywz) wrote: > Hi all, > > I intended to use etcd as data store for Zun project. So I installed > docker and started a docker container with an etcd server running in it > using > devstack script. The etcd server listens on 127.0.0.1:2379 for client

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] tooz 1.44.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are ecstatic to announce the release of: tooz 1.44.0: Coordination library for distributed systems. This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tooz Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.i18n 3.10.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are glowing to announce the release of: oslo.i18n 3.10.0: Oslo i18n library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.i18n Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.i18n Please

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.log 3.17.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are high-spirited to announce the release of: oslo.log 3.17.0: oslo.log library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.log Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.log Please

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.serialization 2.14.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are happy to announce the release of: oslo.serialization 2.14.0: Oslo Serialization library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.serialization Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.db 4.14.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are chuffed to announce the release of: oslo.db 4.14.0: Oslo Database library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.db Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.db Please

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-vpp]Introducing networking-vpp

2016-10-18 Thread Ian Wells
On 6 October 2016 at 10:43, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 10/06/2016 11:58 AM, Naveen Joy (najoy) wrote: > >> It’s primarliy because we have seen better stability and scalability >> with etcd over rabbitmq. >> > > Well, that's kind of comparing apples to oranges. :) > > One is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][VMT][Security] Glance coresec reorg

2016-10-18 Thread Hemanth Makkapati
+1 to both Erno and Ian. Both have made solid contributions to Glance over the past few cycles and are very thorough in their approach. I believe both of them will be great additions to the Glance coresec group. -Hemanth From: Brian Rosmaita

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] taskflow 2.7.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are gleeful to announce the release of: taskflow 2.7.0: Taskflow structured state management library. This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/taskflow Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.reports 1.15.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are jubilant to announce the release of: oslo.reports 1.15.0: oslo.reports library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.reports Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] oslo.policy 1.16.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are happy to announce the release of: oslo.policy 1.16.0: Oslo Policy library This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.policy Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.policy

[openstack-dev] [new][oslo] futurist 0.19.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-18 Thread no-reply
We are thrilled to announce the release of: futurist 0.19.0: Useful additions to futures, from the future. This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/futurist Download the package from:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] indoor climbing break at summit?

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Joshua Harlow wrote: Anyone want to bring a (gym size recommended, unless the walls there are *hugg*) rope for leading? I don't want to bring mine all the way from CA (unless I have to). I've got a shorty I can probably bring if someone closer cannot. I was

Re: [openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Proposing Pierre-Alexandre Bardina (pabardina) as core for cloudkitty

2016-10-18 Thread Guillaume Espanel
+1 -- Guillaume Espanel Objectif Libre www.objectif-libre.com Infrastructure et Formations Linux Le 2016-10-18 13:16, Christophe Sauthier a écrit : Hello developer mailing list folks, I'd like to propose that we add Pierre-Aexandre Bardina (pabardina) as an OpenStack cloudkitty core reviewer.

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Cancelling team meeting - 10/17/2016

2016-10-18 Thread Renat Akhmerov
> On 18 Oct 2016, at 14:51, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > On 17 October 2016 at 10:26, Renat Akhmerov > wrote: > Hi, just one week left before the summit and there’s a lot of preparations > going on so we’re

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Thierry Carrez Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: October 18, 2016 at 03:55:41 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: 

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic] introspection and CI

2016-10-18 Thread Dougal Matthews
On 17 October 2016 at 22:10, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > Greetings, > > The RDO CI team is considering adding retries to our calls to > introspection again [1]. > This is very handy for bare metal environments where retries may be needed > due to random chaos in the environment

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]Question about unit tests for shelve/unshleve

2016-10-18 Thread Rikimaru Honjo
On 2016/10/18 3:50, Andrew Laski wrote: On Sun, Oct 16, 2016, at 07:11 AM, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: Hi all, I have a question about unit tests of nova. (I found this question when I fixed a bug about shelve.[1]) "nova.tests.unit.compute.test_shelve.ShelveComputeAPITestCase" has test cases for

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Thierry Carrez
Doug Wiegley wrote: > [...] Paths forward: > > 1. Add gunicorn to global requirements. > > 2. Create a project specific “amphora-requirements.txt” file for the > service VM packages (this is actually my preference.) It has been > pointed out that this wouldn’t be kept up-to-date by the bot. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Cancelling team meeting - 10/17/2016

2016-10-18 Thread Dougal Matthews
On 17 October 2016 at 10:26, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > Hi, just one week left before the summit and there’s a lot of preparations > going on so we’re cancelling team meeting today. > I'd like to raise the idea of moving the meeting to a more convenient time again. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] indoor climbing break at summit?

2016-10-18 Thread Carlos Camacho Gonzalez
Hey! I think is an awesome idea! - We should be able to do some Top roping as the ropes should be already there. - No need to take all you equipment (rental package: harness + shoes + chalk bag 5€) I can take my grigri so no one will die. - I'll give them a call to check availability. Cheers,

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Proposing Pierre-Alexandre Bardina (pabardina) as core for cloudkitty

2016-10-18 Thread Christophe Sauthier
Hello developer mailing list folks, I'd like to propose that we add Pierre-Aexandre Bardina (pabardina) as an OpenStack cloudkitty core reviewer. He has been a member of our community for a long time, contributing very seriously in cloudkitty especially on the integration of cloudkitty in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic] introspection and CI

2016-10-18 Thread Wesley Hayutin
See my response inline. On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 10/17/2016 11:10 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> The RDO CI team is considering adding retries to our calls to >> introspection >> again [1]. >> This is very handy for bare

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] indoor climbing break at summit?

2016-10-18 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 18/10/16 12:17 +0200, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: Hey! I think is an awesome idea! - We should be able to do some Top roping as the ropes should be already there. - No need to take all you equipment (rental package: harness + shoes + chalk bag 5€) I can take my grigri so no one will die.

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] jobs shuffle to add IPv6 coverage

2016-10-18 Thread Gabriele Cerami
Hello, after adding coverage in CI for HA IPv6 scenario here https://review.openstack.org/363674 we wanted to add IPv6 testing on the gates. To not use any more resources the first suggestion to add IPv6 to the gates was to make all HA jobs IPv6, move network isolation testing for IPv4 on non-ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Propose support generate IPv4 and IPv6 random address( or network) for documentation(test?)

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-10-17 20:59:23 -0700: > I think doug (he can correct me if I am wrong) was more wondering the > question of 'why would you want to use random data' in a test vs using > known fixed data. When a test fails it can be quite hard to identify the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Core team updates

2016-10-18 Thread Loo, Ruby
Chris and Haomeng, thanks for your past reviews and I look forward to your return to the core team. For the folks that are clearly reviewing far more than others, what do you think about asking them not to review so much? I'd vote for that :) --ruby From: Jim Rollenhagen

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic] introspection and CI

2016-10-18 Thread John Trowbridge
On 10/18/2016 07:20 AM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > See my response inline. > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > >> On 10/17/2016 11:10 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> The RDO CI team is considering adding retries to our calls to

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-qos meeting cancelled until 11/15

2016-10-18 Thread Nate Johnston
All, I am cancelling the neutron-qos meeting for this week, as well as the week right after the summit. So the next neutron-qos meeting will be on 11/15. I look forward to seeing you all in Barcelona! Thanks, --N. __

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
If there's no objection to us using gunicorn without it being present in g-r, then I don't know if I want to argue strongly for adding it -- the only benefit I see to tracking g-r at all is that it lets us continue to get free version tracking for our amphora dependencies as they are updated in

[openstack-dev] [Summit][Security] Ops security session - flagging this for the OSSP

2016-10-18 Thread Rob C
The Ops Meetup, organized by the User Committee's Ops Meetups Team, is a track comprised of collaborative, working sessions for people who are operating OpenStack clouds (and contributors who want to hear from them). The purpose is to share knowledge and best practices among cloud operators, as

[openstack-dev] [all] Storlets Newton Release

2016-10-18 Thread eran
While not yet part of the big tent (which also explains the time we are at :-) Storlets have a Newton release. This release features: * Python support for writing storlets. This large chunk of work involved refactoring, improving and unit testing much of the code that deals with

Re: [openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Proposing Pierre-Alexandre Bardina (pabardina) as core for cloudkitty

2016-10-18 Thread Shake Chen
Hi All the Cores member are same company, seem not good idea. only 5 revew, 1 commit. On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Guillaume Espanel < guillaume.espa...@objectif-libre.com> wrote: > +1 > > -- > Guillaume Espanel > Objectif Libre www.objectif-libre.com > Infrastructure et Formations Linux >

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
We really don't want bindep IMO -- it's much safer to use the non-packaged version from pypi for our purposes, since we may not be running on a system that packages things like this. Again, our use case may be strange though, as we're really using the python module and not the binaries. --Adam

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] indoor climbing break at summit?

2016-10-18 Thread Miles Gould
On 17/10/16 18:43, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, gordon chung wrote: you forgot to add disclaimer how you broke every bone in your body a while back. \o/ Thanks for paying attention, you get a gold star. But actually it was only three. And it was outside. Maybe what you're really

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic] introspection and CI

2016-10-18 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 10/17/2016 11:10 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: Greetings, The RDO CI team is considering adding retries to our calls to introspection again [1]. This is very handy for bare metal environments where retries may be needed due to random chaos in the environment itself. We're trying to balance two

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] [spec] Feedback wanted on TripleO Tendrl Integration Proposal

2016-10-18 Thread John Fulton
Hello, I'd like to post a link to a blueprint I am hoping will be discussed at the upcoming summit. Please share any comments you may have in the Gerrit review for the spec. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387631/ https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-tendrl-integration

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Propose support generate IPv4 and IPv6 random address( or network) for documentation(test?)

2016-10-18 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: In Neutron, we have a need to allocate random but unique addresses and such. For that matter, we have a concept of exclusive resources: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/tree/master/neutron/tests/common/exclusive_resources that are relying on locks and shared file based

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 10:39 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > > On 10/18/2016 11:25 AM, Adam Harwell wrote: >> We really don't want bindep IMO -- it's much safer to use the >> non-packaged version from pypi for our purposes, since we may not be >> running on a system that

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/18/2016 02:37 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > On Oct 17, 2016 7:27 PM, "Thomas Goirand" > wrote: >> >> On 10/17/2016 08:43 PM, Adam Harwell wrote: >> > Jim, that is exactly my thought -- the main focus of g-r as far as I was >> > aware is to maintain

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Matthew Thode
On 10/18/2016 11:25 AM, Adam Harwell wrote: > We really don't want bindep IMO -- it's much safer to use the > non-packaged version from pypi for our purposes, since we may not be > running on a system that packages things like this. Again, our use case > may be strange though, as we're really

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/18/2016 02:44 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > For the record uwsgi was not (at least at one point) allowed in g-r as > it was not a "runtime dependency" it was to be installed more like > apache mod_wsgi at the time. Gunicorn could fall into the same category, > it is meant to be used in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] ResourceProvider design issues

2016-10-18 Thread Ed Leafe
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 8:45 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 10/17/2016 11:14 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: >> Now that we’re starting to model some more complex resources, it seems that >> some of the original design decisions may have been mistaken. One approach >> to work around this

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >

[openstack-dev] [api] [nova] microversion edge case query

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Dent
I'm in the midst of writing the microversion handling code for the placement API and I've stumbled across a situation that I'm not sure how I should resolve. This is not necessarily something that someone should do with microversion, but since it is possible, I'd like to make the code behave in

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Matthew Thode
On 10/18/2016 11:35 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > The issue isn't co-instability, but the fact that downstream > distribution vendors will only package *ONE* version of a given python > module. If we have Octavia with version X, and another component of > OpenStack with version Y, then we're stuck

Re: [openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Proposing Pierre-Alexandre Bardina (pabardina) as core for cloudkitty

2016-10-18 Thread Shake Chen
Thanks for your reply. Hope the Cloudkitty core review team can more active https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/cloudkitty+status:open On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Christophe Sauthier < christophe.sauth...@objectif-libre.com> wrote: > Ho Shake, > > Thanks for your feedback

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Matthew Thode
On 10/18/2016 08:07 AM, Adam Harwell wrote: > If there's no objection to us using gunicorn without it being present in > g-r, then I don't know if I want to argue strongly for adding it -- the > only benefit I see to tracking g-r at all is that it lets us continue to > get free version tracking

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Propose support generate IPv4 and IPv6 random address( or network) for documentation(test?)

2016-10-18 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Joshua Harlow wrote: Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: In Neutron, we have a need to allocate random but unique addresses and such. For that matter, we have a concept of exclusive resources: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/tree/master/neutron/tests/common/exclusive_resources

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Matthew Thode wrote: On 10/18/2016 11:25 AM, Adam Harwell wrote: We really don't want bindep IMO -- it's much safer to use the non-packaged version from pypi for our purposes, since we may not be running on a system that packages things like this. Again, our use case may

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 10/18/2016 02:44 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: >> For the record uwsgi was not (at least at one point) allowed in g-r as >> it was not a "runtime dependency" it was to be installed more like >> apache mod_wsgi at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [nova] microversion edge case query

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote: If the requested microversion is greater than the maximum, a 404 still makes some sense (no mapping _now_), but a 406 could as well because it provides a signal that if you used a different microversion the situation could be different and the time

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][release] Tripleo Newton RC3 available

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for Tripleo for the end of the Newton cycle is available. You can find the RC3 source code tarballs at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/instack-undercloud/instack-undercloud-5.0.0.0rc3.tar.gz

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic] introspection and CI

2016-10-18 Thread Joe Talerico
With large sets of nodes to introspect we typically avoid using the bulk introspection. I have written a quick script that introspects a couple nodes at a time: https://gist.github.com/jtaleric/fcca3811cd4d8f37336f9532e5b9c9ff Maybe we can add this sort of logic to bulk introspection, with some

Re: [openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Proposing Pierre-Alexandre Bardina (pabardina) as core for cloudkitty

2016-10-18 Thread Christophe Sauthier
Ho Shake, Thanks for your feedback !!! It is true (that all core so far are from the same company). On the other hand there are only 3 cores... The thing is in the past we haven't been unable to get a contributor on a "long period of time" outside the company... Which is the reason why so

[openstack-dev] Ops Lightning Talks

2016-10-18 Thread David Medberry
Dear Readers, We have TWO back-to-back (double sessions) of Lightning Talks for Operators. And by "for Operators" I mean largely that Operators will be the audience. If you have an OpenStack problem, thingamajig, technique, simplification, gadget, whatzit that readily lends itself to a Lightning

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Summit schedule is set

2016-10-18 Thread Loo, Ruby
Hello ironic'ers, For the design sessions to be as productive as possible, please prepare beforehand so that the sessions are spent discussing and coming up with solutions/consensus, instead of describing and getting folks up-to-speed on the issues. Feel free to add your comments directly in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tosca-parser] [heat-translator] cross-project design session with [Tacker] at summit

2016-10-18 Thread Sahdev P Zala
Qiming, hi, I meant to say Friday Oct 28th (October for Ocata :)) Thanks for noticing it. Absolutely, I have added it to the agenda and I will cover it. Totally understand the overlapping of various sessions. In the Heat Translator we have recently added support for translation to Senlin

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Oct 18, 2016 8:09 AM, "Adam Harwell" wrote: > > If there's no objection to us using gunicorn without it being present in g-r, then I don't know if I want to argue strongly for adding it -- the only benefit I see to tracking g-r at all is that it lets us continue to get

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]: Instance creation and deletion metrics in ceilometer !

2016-10-18 Thread Raghunath D
Hi , How can instance created and deleted information/sample can be retrieved from ceilometer. What entries should be there in pipeline.yaml  to get instance deleted information. I tried to have meters- "instance" in pipeline.yam but it always gives active instance details, and no details of

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
For the record, it might help if people actually look at how we're proposing to use the gunicorn python module (remember, this code is executing inside a *service VM*, not on the main control plane): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386758/12/octavia/cmd/agent.py On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:05 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 12:00:35 -0600: > > > On Oct 18, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 09:59:54 -0600: > >> > >>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Ian Cordasco

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 09:59:54 -0600: > > > On Oct 18, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Thierry Carrez > > > Reply: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 09:59:54 -0600: >> >>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Ian Cordasco >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>

[openstack-dev] [swg] Meeting next week cancelled & Barcelona Summit info

2016-10-18 Thread Colette Alexander
Hi there SWG-ers & OpenStackers, This is official notice that our Tues, Oct 25th, 15:00 UTC meeting is canceled due to the Ocata Summit in Barcelona. The Stewardship Working Group has two sessions worth attending live if you'll be in Barcelona. 1) A cross project session Wednesday at 12:15 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Monty Taylor
On 10/18/2016 12:05 PM, Adam Harwell wrote: > Inline comments. > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:38 AM Thomas Goirand > wrote: > > On 10/18/2016 02:37 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2016 7:27 PM, "Thomas Goirand"

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] jobs shuffle to add IPv6 coverage

2016-10-18 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > Hello, > > after adding coverage in CI for HA IPv6 scenario here > https://review.openstack.org/363674 we wanted to add IPv6 testing on the > gates. > To not use any more resources the first suggestion to add IPv6 to

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
Inline comments. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:38 AM Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/18/2016 02:37 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2016 7:27 PM, "Thomas Goirand" > > wrote: > >> > >> On 10/17/2016 08:43 PM, Adam Harwell wrote: > >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][release] Tripleo Newton RC3 available

2016-10-18 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Hello everyone, > > A new release candidate for Tripleo for the end of the Newton cycle > is available. You can find the RC3 source code tarballs at: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #94

2016-10-18 Thread Iury Gregory
rrow at 3pm UTC on #openstack-meeting-4 > > Here is the agenda: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20161018 > > Feel free to add topics, and any outstanding bug and patch. > > See you tomorrow! > Thanks > > -- >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Core team updates

2016-10-18 Thread Villalovos, John L
I just want to give a big thank you to Haomeng Wang and Chris Krelle for all their contributions to Ironic! And especially thanks to Chris (NobodyCam) for all of his help while I was learning about Ironic. It helps we were in the same timezone, so we overlapped in IRC often :) John >

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [nova] microversion edge case query

2016-10-18 Thread Ed Leafe
On Oct 18, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > If the requested microversion is greater than the maximum, a 404 still > makes some sense (no mapping _now_), but a 406 could as well because it > provides a signal that if you used a different microversion the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 12:00:35 -0600: >> >>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Doug Hellmann >> > wrote: >>> >>> Excerpts from Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
Yep, I believe we did this in the past when we first started down this path with Octavia, but we may have been too early -- maybe now is a better time to do it. I will be at the summit and more than happy to attend a related meeting. But, I agree with Doug that we shouldn't stall this because of

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 12:21:20 -0600: > > > On Oct 18, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 12:00:35 -0600: > >> > >>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Doug Hellmann

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Wiegley
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 12:21:20 -0600: >> >>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> >>> Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18

[openstack-dev] [all][tc][horizon][ux][qa][release] cleaning up extra-atcs list

2016-10-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
We have a handful of people listed for ATC status under the "extra-atcs" lists in the governance repository for whom the expiration date has passed. I've prepared a patch to clean up the lists [1] and added the PTLs for the related projects so they can confirm or indicate their intent to renew the

[openstack-dev] [tacker] Weekly meeting cancelled for Oct 25th 2016 and Nov 1st 2016

2016-10-18 Thread Sripriya Seetharam
Hi Tackers, Tacker weekly meeting is cancelled for the following 2 weeks i.e., Oct 25th 2016 and Nov 1st 2016 in lieu of the summit and folks travelling back. We will resume on Nov 8th 2016. Have a great summit and safe travels! -Sripriya

  1   2   >