Re: Pax-exam with java11+ for karaf4

I will take a look but probably the launcher to update. Le dim. 21 avr. 2019 à 11:39, Gareth Healy a écrit : > I am trying to get pax-exam testing karaf4 on java11 but looking at the > logs, doesn't really tell me anything. It just seems "stuck". > > JUnit logs: >

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Cleanup

Thanks, let me take a look. Regards JB On 19/04/2019 13:37, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > Here's new readme.adoc I prepared for pax-logging (probably a good > candidate for PAXLOGGING wiki): > > = PAX-LOGGING > > The goal of this project is to allow users and bundles to use well >

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Cleanup

Hi, it sounds good to me. For the dependencies, don't forget to update the OSGi headers in pax-logging-service. Regards JB On 18/04/2019 07:54, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > I have few issues backlogged for PAXLOGGING Jira: >  – PAXLOGGING-243: Incorrect bundle names in the logs in case

Re: PaxWeb: Jetty and GZipHandler

Hello > > There are 40 unresolved issues in > https://ops4j1.jira.com/projects/PAXWEB/summary/statistics > - I didn't see any about gzip. > Could you refresh my memory? :) > > regards > Grzegor

Re: PaxWeb: Jetty and GZipHandler

Not with recent 7.2.x version. I think it deserves a unit test ;) Regards JB On 16/01/2019 14:20, Jérémie Brébec wrote: > Hello, > > I reopen this old thread, but has anyone a working example of a > GzipHandler with PaxWeb (7.2.5) ? > > Thanks ! > > Le mercredi 30 août 2017 06:20:23 UTC+2,

Re: PaxLogging and Structured logs

external logging system. > > Le jeudi 10 janvier 2019 13:48:23 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi Jérémis, > > You mean without marshalling to a "flat" log event ? > > Regards > JB > > On 10/01/2019 13:44, Jérémie Brébec wrote:

Re: PaxLogging and Structured logs

Hi Jérémis, You mean without marshalling to a "flat" log event ? Regards JB On 10/01/2019 13:44, Jérémie Brébec wrote: > Hello, > > I try to use a log4j2 logger to log some structured logs (like > instances of MapMessage). However, my message is lost and the > appenders receive instances of

Re: PAX URL 2.6.0 - plan to release

+1 Thanks ! Regards JB On 07/01/2019 11:08, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > There are 7 fixed issues, planned currently for version 2.6.0[1]. As > usual, most of the issues are related to Maven. > I bumped minor version (2.5 → 2.6) because I've successfully replaced > Eclipse Aether with new

Re: [PAX-EXAM] Issue with KarafManipulatorFactory and custom Karaf package version

Thanks Martin. Regards JB On 10/12/2018 17:14, Martin Lichtin wrote: > Sounds great. https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-924 > > On Monday, December 10, 2018 at 1:33:02 PM UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > Hi Martin > > It makes sense IMHO. Can you pl

Re: [PAX-EXAM] Issue with KarafManipulatorFactory and custom Karaf package version

Hi Martin It makes sense IMHO. Can you please create a Jira about that, I will improve the versioning management. Thanks, Regards JB On 10/12/2018 13:04, Martin Lichtin wrote: > I'd like to to use Pax-Exam with a custom-built Karaf that uses a > custom versioning. > Problem is with this code

Re: [PAX-WEB] pax-web-jsp with vulnerable taglibs library

Thanks for the Jira. I will also take a look later today. Regards JB Le mar. 27 nov. 2018 à 09:09, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > Hello > > I've created https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-1188 to track this and > assigned to me. I'll try to look at it soon. > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > >

Re: Listener elements are not deregistered

Thanks for the report. Let me check. Regards JB Le jeu. 15 nov. 2018 à 11:13, Janos Csikos a écrit : > Hi, > > Pax ver: 7.2.3 > Karaf ver: 4.2.1 > > Description: > I'm going to register an event listener, a HttpSessionListener in my > bundle. On e.g., bundle restarts the listeners are not

Re: [PAX-WEB] Plan to release pax web 7.2.4 soon and idea for 7.3.x

Hi, 7.3.0 is fine. I'm also working on a branch from master (8.0.0) to have new R7 features supported. Regards JB On 02/11/2018 15:36, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > There are several fixes in pax-web 7.2.x branch: > > * [PAXWEB-1184] Upgrade to Karaf 4.2.1 > * [PAXWEB-1158][PAXWEB-1183]

Re: Release Pax Exam 4.13/5.0

here perhaps areas I could > assist (e.g. testing)? > > Best regards, > > Arnoud. > > On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 1:17:01 PM UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > Hi Oli, > > Yes, as I'm working on JUnit 5 update (Pax Exampl 5.0) and Java 11 >

Re: Release Pax Exam 4.13/5.0

Hi Oli, Yes, as I'm working on JUnit 5 update (Pax Exampl 5.0) and Java 11 support/improvements (ASM, XBean, ... for both Pax Exam 4.x and 5.x). Regards JB On 09/10/2018 13:08, Oliver Lietz wrote: > Hi *, > > is anyone planning a release of Pax Exam for the near future? > > Thanks, > O. > --

Re: PAX-JDBC Error during pax-jdbc-config bundle deactivation

+1 for the release Regards JB Le 26 sept. 2018 à 03:46, à 03:46, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit: >Hello > >https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-133 is fixed now. I'd like to >cut a >release of pax-jdbc 1.3.1 this week - there are no more unresolved >PAXJDBC >issues. Anything more before I start

Re: [PAX WICKET] 5.0.0.RC1

+1 It sounds good to bump the version. Regards JB On 21/09/2018 07:37, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: > Yes thats a good idea. > > Am 21.09.18 um 06:39 schrieb nino martinez wael: >> Hi Guys >> >> Wicket 8.1 have been released, and the current feature for PAX Wicket >> 5.0.0.RC1 WICKET

Re: [PAX-EXAM] No runnable methods

;>>> > From: ops4j@googlegroups.com [mailto:ops4j@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of > Lukasz Lech > Sent: Freitag, 3. August 2018 15:53 > To: ops4j@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: [PAX-EXAM] No runnable methods > > Great, Thanks. > > waitForService() together wit

Re: [PAX-EXAM] No runnable methods

me to initialize… Is there any reliable > mechanism to wait for all bundles to start in pax-exam test? > >   > > Best regards, > > Lukasz Lech > >   > > *From:*ops4j@googlegroups.com [mailto:ops4j@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Jean-Baptiste Onofré > *Sent:

Re: [PAX-EXAM] No runnable methods

Hi Lukasz, The boot features are installed in the early stage of the Karaf bootstrap. That's why we have to add in the cfg file. You can install a feature with the provided features just after the bootstrap (in @before as you did). So, what's exactly your request ? CoreOptions.featureInstall()

Re: ops4j jenkins down?

Hi Stephan, AFAIR, we are using circleci now (at least for Pax Web): https://circleci.com/gh/ops4j Let me check if Jenkins is still used. Regards JB On 25/05/2018 07:49, Stephan Siano wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible that the ops4j jenkins ci.ops4j.org is down? I get a > connection timeout if

Re: Making extenders subsystem-aware

Agree with Christoph. I would also recommend to take a look on subsystem and region. Regards JB Le 23 mai 2018 à 12:07, à 12:07, "'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J" a écrit: >I would consider using the systembundles bundle context is bad style! >This would break instantly

Re: Karaf 4.2.0 / pax-jdbc 1.2.1

Hi Lukasz I have a series of update for 4.2.1. pax jdbc will be part of this. In the mean time, updating etc/org.apache.karaf.features.repos.cfg should do the trick. Regards JB Le 23 avr. 2018 à 14:29, à 14:29, Lukasz Lech a écrit: >Hello, > >I've tested Karaf 4.2.0 only

[PAX WEB] Release Pax Web 7.0.0 this morning

Hi guys, I plan to release Pax Web 7.0.0 this morning (I'm fixing the Jetty 9.4.x update on master right now). If you have any objection, please let me know. Thanks, Regards JB -- -- -- OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message

Re: Pax JDBC data sources are missing and never get resolved in a Karaf active/active configuration

node 2's log.  As soon as I bring down node 1, then I see the data > sources on node 2 initialize. > > Could this have anything to do with ActiveMQ master/slave? That's the only > constant here. It seems unlikely, but I'm out of ideas. > > > > On Thursday, March 8, 2018

Re: Pax JDBC data sources are missing and never get resolved in a Karaf active/active configuration

Hi, Cellar syncs the bundles and config on the cluster. By default, it doesn't sync "local" config (basically the etc/*.cfg files). To do so, you have to enable the local listener in etc/org.apache.karaf.cellar.groups.cfg. Else, you have to use cluster:config-property-set to create the config

Re: [PAX WEB] Update master to 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT and create 7.0.x branch

him Nierbeck: > > Fine with me. > > regards, Achim > > 2018-02-05 7:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré > <jeanbapti...@gmail.com>: > > Hi guys, > > In order to upgrade to Jetty 9.4.x without bringing OSGi R7 on the >

Re: PAX Exam OSGI Components

Not sure I understand what you mean. If you use Karaf pax exam container it's as when you are a vanilla Karaf. Regards JB Le 20 févr. 2018 à 12:00, à 12:00, nino martinez wael a écrit: >Hi > >Are there anyway to get declarative services components? Both the

Re: Pax Exam 4.12 release

No yet, but no objection from my side. Regards JB On 02/12/2018 11:57 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > hi all, > > are there any release plans for Pax Exam 4.12? > > Thanks, > O. > -- -- -- OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

Hi Christoph, I think we are almost good for 4.12.0 release. Regards JB On 11/24/2017 10:00 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: Hi, I'd like to know what is left fro the 4.12.0 relase? I created a pull-request[1] for the Eclipse-Container feature (merged from the current 5.x

Re: Want to report and fix an PAX-Logging issue from 1.9.x, need an access account, Thanks!

Hi Can you provide some details ? Did you already create a Jira account request ? Thanks Regards JB On Oct 31, 2017, 03:12, at 03:12, xilai...@gmail.com wrote: >Hi > >Want to report and fix an PAX-Logging issue from 1.9.x, need an access >account, Thanks! > >-- >-- >-- >OPS4J

Re: TinyBundles: release 3.0.0?

+1 Regards JB On 10/12/2017 02:18 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: I found that TinyBundles on master already supports my main requirements: - Uses the new bndlib 3.4.0 - Supports DS annotations Can we do a release of it? As I got a new laptop I am not yet prepared to do the release myself can

Re: Pax-Exam: Getting exit code for remote TestContainer

Yup, it makes sense to add "easy" exit code for the process. Regards JB On 10/11/2017 05:14 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: I found a hacky way to get the exit code. See https://gist.github.com/cschneider/5bb61baa032e16c4492e5c6235648de7 It would be great if we the TestContainer could return

Re: Pax-Exam: Karaf has problems viewing it

Hi Martin, what's the Pax Exam version and Karaf version ? Regards JB On 10/04/2017 11:56 PM, Martin Lichtin wrote: 418 | Active   |  80 | | PAXEXAM-PROBE-a6137ef4-da57-4b2b-b82a-b3bbc84d7bd3 karaf@root()> headers 418 Bundle 418 -- Error executing

Re: [PAX-JDBC][1.2.0] pooling properties not forwarded to pool impl.

help here? Am Dienstag, 19. September 2017 11:13:18 UTC+2 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: Hi it sounds like a bug, can you create a Jira about that ? Thanks, Regards JB On 09/19/2017 11:03 AM, Maurice Betzel wrote: Dear community, i am trying to setup a database

Re: [PAX-JDBC][1.2.0] pooling properties not forwarded to pool impl.

Hi it sounds like a bug, can you create a Jira about that ? Thanks, Regards JB On 09/19/2017 11:03 AM, Maurice Betzel wrote: Dear community, i am trying to setup a database connection pool for Oracle using the ojdbc8 12.2.0.1 Driver, but if i add: | jdbc.pool.maxTotal=16 | i get a

Re: pax-logging mysterious blocks in karaf (4.1.0)

Hi, I would suggest to report the issue in the Karaf Jira. Regards JB On 09/07/2017 10:49 AM, Lukasz Lech wrote: Hello! I’ve managed to identify the problem nearer. The FileOutputStream apparently was attempting to write onto Karaf console, because after pressing Ctrl+C in the console,

Re: OPS4J Pax URL, find what maven repository has an artifact?

Hi, it's already what I replied on the Karaf mailing list. AFAIR, Steinar wants to avoid bundle:update: he wants an auto-update (and bundle:watch can only update from the local repository). Regards JB On 09/04/2017 05:59 PM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello What you described is implemented

Re: [pax-web][proposal] Reorganization of branches

Hi It sounds good to me. Regards JB On Sep 4, 2017, 14:03, at 14:03, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: >Hello > >I'm almost done with PAXWEB-1103 (XML configuration for Undertow) and >it >looks like this can no longer be considered a micro change. > >I wanted to ask you if we can

Re: Preparing pax-web-6.0.7 release

+1 Regards JB On Aug 24, 2017, 11:07, at 11:07, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: >Hello > >I'd like to release 6.0.7 of pax-web - with fixes to: > – PAXWEB-1117 – Race condition when registering servlets and so forth > – PAXWEB-1118 – Missing dependency (jetty-deploy bundle) in

Re: [pax-logging] Is it OK to integrate BSD licensed bwaldvogel/log4j-systemd-journal-appender into pax logging?

see e.g. the JSON licence. Regards, Stephen On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:27:00 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com <mailto:jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi > > BSD is a cat B but not cat X so yes it's possible. N

Re: [pax-logging] Is it OK to integrate BSD licensed bwaldvogel/log4j-systemd-journal-appender into pax logging?

Hi BSD is a cat B but not cat X so yes it's possible. No worries. Regards JB On Jul 27, 2017, 19:16, at 19:16, Michael Vorburger wrote: >Hello Paxifians, > >For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5275 for >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475951, a

Re: [pax-exam] move to pax-exam 5?

+1 Regards JB On 07/12/2017 10:24 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: Hi, I'd like to clean up the the Container API (see PAXEXAM-822 and linked ones), simplyfy and unify the creation of OSGi-Container (like native, karaf, forked) as well as adding a new Eclipse-Platform Container

Re: [REGISTER] Joining ops4j1.jira.com and discussing feature request

disabled. Sorry for the inconvenience. Contact the OPS4J General list to have an account created. *From:*ops4j@googlegroups.com [mailto:ops4j@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Jean-Baptiste Onofré *Sent:* Dienstag, 20. Juni 2017 11:56 *To:* ops4j@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [REGISTER] Joining

Re: [REGISTER] Joining ops4j1.jira.com and discussing feature request

Hi, Did you already request an id on Jira ? Regards JB On 06/20/2017 11:50 AM, Lukasz Lech wrote: Hello, I’d like to join https://ops4j1.jira.com and as the message states, I need to apply here to register. The background is the problem with pax-web behavior

Re: pax-web-6.0.5 release?

Hi Grzegorz Can you wait up to tonight or tomorrow morning ? I have an investigation in progress. Thanks ! Regards JB On 06/06/2017 01:54 PM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello If you don't mind. I'd like to release pax-web-6.0.5 with some recent fixes: * 59dca84 - [PAXWEB-1099] Allow to

Re: [proposal] pax-web 6.0.4 release

+1 Regards JB On 05/25/2017 08:37 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello I'm going to release pax-web 6.0.4 with important fixes related to undertow and "default servlets". If there are no pending fixes that you're going to push, I'll release today ~12PM CEST. regards Grzegorz Grzybek -- --

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pax-Logging 1.10.0

Thanks Guillaume ! Regards JB On 05/02/2017 11:18 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Yeah, I forgot about that one. I'll do the release asap. 2017-05-02 10:44 GMT+02:00 Danesh Kuruppu >: Hi Guillaume, Just need to know the status of the

Re: Pax-cdi 1.0.0-RC2 missing requirements on CdiOsgi

Hi Charlie Let me take a look. Regards JB On Feb 25, 2017, 20:32, at 20:32, Charlie Mordant wrote: >Hi Opened guys! > >I'm trying the newest and greatest 1.0.0-RC2 version of pax-cdi. >While trying to load some CDI fragments (aries tx weld transactional >support and

Re: [pax logging] Need new version in jira

Done: I created versions 1.9.2 and 1.8.8. Regards JB On 02/22/2017 12:09 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: I just fixed this issue: https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXLOGGING-225 I would like to set the fix version but there is currently no unreleased version in jira. Can someone add the next

Re: How does pax web load jsp tag libraries?

Hi Christian The pax-web-jsp module is scanning the war or wab for taglib descriptors. I can't provide deeper details without the code but it's what I remember. Achim will provide further details since I'm not around. Regards JB On Feb 7, 2017, 08:28, at 08:28, Christian Schneider

Re: Karaf container not loaded from pax exam 4.9.1

Hi, can you try with Pax Exam 4.10.0 I released last night ? Thanks, Regards JB On 01/31/2017 06:56 AM, Namrata Kapse wrote: Hello, We are using costomise karaf 4.0.7. For Module testing tried with pax exam 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 both are not loading the container of Karaf. When we run test

Re: Introduction and release of pax-jdbc

Hi Sascha welcome aboard ! Great to have you there ! One thing that I would like to do in Pax JDBC is to be compliant with blueprint (in addition of ConfigAdmin). Thanks to that we would be able to deal with "old" and "new" style datasource service in Karaf. Another thing I saw is the

Re: ETA for next Pax-Exam maintenance release?

+1 I can cut off the release. Let me know. Regards JB On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 4:37:29 PM UTC+2, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Just wondering if there are any plans for a Pax-Exam (4.9.2) maintenance > release? > > I’d like to consume a new feature I added recently: >

[ANN] OPS4J Pax Logging 1.8.6 Released

Hi, The Pax Logging team is happy to announce the release of *OPS4J Pax Logging 1.8.6*. This is a minor release with couple of bug fixes. See announce for details: https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/paxlogging/2016/09/06/Pax+Logging+1.8.6+Released Enjoy. Pax Logging Team -- --

Re: Pax Logging release?

running pax-logging-api 1.8.5 with > pax-logging-log4j2 with 1.8.1? > > Our OSGi import version ranges are pretty lax: [0.9.5,2.0.0). > > Cheers, > Raúl. > > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 16:34:22 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Agree, but not on a minor relea

Re: Pax Logging release?

they cannot > get the latest kid on the block, and should settle with a legacy Pax > Logging version. > > Don't you think? > > Cheers. > > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 16:23:46 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Correct, I meant Java7 (not Java8). >>

Re: Pax Logging release?

Correct, I meant Java7 (not Java8). On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:18:32 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: > > I thought the problem was that it required Java 7, not 8. None of the > pax-logging dependencies require Java 8. > > On 6 September 2016 at 09:16, Jean-Baptiste On

Re: Pax Logging release?

t;>>>> >>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 16:52, <ra...@evosent.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The OSGi import issues following the Logback 1.1.7 upgrades are now >>>>>> fixed. So please stick with Logback 1.1.7 for the 1.8.6 release

Re: Headsup - Pax-Web 4.3.0 Minor version Bump

+1 I will prepare the first release then. Regards JB On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 12:07:37 AM UTC+2, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > > Hi, > > today I detected that we have some changes on a couple of packages which > actually require a minor version bump and also one which would require a >

<    1   2