Re: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

To add more comments: On the L2SM meeting, several people (4 or more) believed the 3 service delivery model examples ([I-D.dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang], [I-D.ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang] and [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-yang]) are actually device models. I think both of the two I-Ds

Re: [OPSAWG] New OpsAWG chair volunteers...

Hi Ignas, Congratulations and welcome aboard! Regards, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Warren Kumari > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 11:20 PM > To: opsawg@ietf.org; Ignas Bagdonas > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] New OpsAWG chair

Re: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

Hi, Based on the discussion, here I try to clean up the confusion of the two I-Ds. [draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification] classifies the yang modules into "Network Service YANG Module" and the "Network Element YANG Module". And usually, it uses "service module" to imply the "Network

[OPSAWG] FW: [IPFIX] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

be added by direct application to IANA; there's no need for a draft or RFC. However, the introduction and examples may be valuable, especially for BGP experts who are less familiar with IPFIX. I've no objection to adopting the draft. P. On 13/02/17 03:49, Tianran Zhou wrote: > Dear IPFIX, > &

[OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Dear OPSAWG, In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft. By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for In-Situ OAM drafts

发件人: joel jaeggli [joe...@bogus.com] 发送时间: 2017年1月19日 23:28 收件人: Tianran Zhou; opsawg@ietf.org 抄送: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; routing-...@ietf.org; Benoit Claise (bclaise) 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for In-Situ OAM drafts Hi, I thought I would try

[OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Dear WG Members, We just adopted the I-D draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 in this working group. We want to do an IPR poll at the early stage. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02.txt? If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to the

[OPSAWG] draft agenda released --- OPSAWG 13:00-15:00 Thursday

Hi Folks, The joint meeting of OPSAWG and OPS Area is provisionally scheduled for 13:00-15:00 Thursday. https://tools.ietf.org/agenda/98/ We start to accept presentation requests. Please send over your request. Regards, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing

[OPSAWG] OPSAWG meeting agenda posted

Hi WG, The OPSAWG meeting is at 13:00-15:00 Thursday Afternoon session I, March 30, 2017. The meeting agenda is posted according to the applications. https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/agenda/agenda-98-opsawg-00 The speakers please send over your slides to the chairs. Thanks, Tianran

[OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05

Dear OPSAWG, This is a notice to start a two-week OPSAWG WG last call for the document: Manufacturer Usage Description Specification https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud/ Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections to this mailing list. Please

[OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05

Dear WG Members, We are currently preparing draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05 for working group last call. Here is an IPR poll prior to the wglc. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05.txt? If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05

[OPSAWG] Call for Presentation in Chicago

Hi WG, The OPSAWG meeting is scheduled on Thursday, Afternoon Session I 1300-1500, according to the final agenda. Please send your request to the chairs for your presentation. Best, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org

[OPSAWG] Cross-post to Netmod for LC comments//FW: WG LC for Service Models Explained

. Regards, Tianran, OPSAWG co-chair -Original Message- From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 11:06 AM To: opsawg@ietf.org Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC for Service Models Explained Dear OPSAWG

Re: [OPSAWG] [netmod] Cross-post to Netmod for LC comments//FW: WG LC for Service Models Explained

moberg) [mailto:camob...@cisco.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 6:31 PM > To: Tianran Zhou > Cc: net...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] Cross-post to Netmod for LC comments//FW: WG LC for > Service Models Explained > > Tianran, OPSAWG, > > Now that

Re: [OPSAWG] Progress with draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained

That's really good. Let's initiate the last call soon. And as you suggested, it would be a good idea to cross-post to Netmod. Cheers, Tianran -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:23 PM To: Tianran Zhou <zhout

Re: [OPSAWG] Summary of OPS Area / OPSAWG from IETF 99

Hi Brian, Fortunately, we did not use the "chairs slides" finally in the meeting. Instead, "OPS Area Administrativia" and "OPSAWG Administrativia" are used. Both of them included the latest Note Well. Let's remove the "chairs slides" from the material. Thanks, Tianran > -Original

Re: [OPSAWG] Progress with draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained

Hi Adrian, >From the last page of the slides, it seem you still have some minor pending >issues, and hope the working group can help. You can bring them to the mailing >list. When you think you have dealt with all the pending issues, of course you can ask for the LC. Cheers, Tianran

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-01.txt

Hi Med, > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > mohamed.boucad...@orange.com > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:15 PM > To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-01.txt

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-07.txt

ge.com [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com] > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 7:57 PM > To: opsawg@ietf.org; Tianran Zhou > Cc: Ian Farrer; Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil); > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-y...@ietf.org > Subject: TR: New Version Notification for draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-07.txt > > Hi Tian

Re: [OPSAWG] [Softwires] Comments on draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05

I am looking at the YANG tree. The overall structure of this module is clear and simple. In addition to the text improvement, what do you want to discuss and get consensus wrt the YANG data model? Regards, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-07

I agree with Juergen's comments. NAT is a widely deployed service. It's reasonable to standardize the data model for network automation. I hope more vendor representatives can help to improve this work. Tianran > -Original Message- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder

[OPSAWG] WG LC for Service Models Explained

Dear OPSAWG, This is a notice to start a three-week OPSAWG WG last call for the document: Service Models Explained https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained/ Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections to this mailing list. Please

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC for Service Models Explained

Hi Authors, We got pretty good suggestions and comments during the LC. Could you please improve the document and send to the community? Cheers, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017

Re: [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05

> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:18 PM > To: Tianran Zhou; Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil); opsawg@ietf.org > Cc: Ian Farrer > Subject: RE: [Softwires] Comments on draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05 > > Hi Tianran,

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-06 Contributions, Status and Plans

Thanks Tom for pointing this out. We appreciate any review comment. That really helps to improve the document. I think it's back on the right track now. Hopefully, the authors can respond to more interactions. Regards, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: t.petch

Re: [OPSAWG] LC request//RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-09.txt

Hi Zongpeng, Thank you very much for picking this work up. The new version has a significant improvement on addressing existing comments. One more question that many people may be interested. Whether this I-D has been implemented or has plan to be implemented and deployed? Best, Tianran >

[OPSAWG] Call for Presentation in Prague

Hi WG, The OPSAWG meeting is scheduled on Tuesday, Afternoon Session I 1330-1530, according to the final agenda. Please send your request to the mailing list or the chairs for your presentation. Best, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org

Re: [OPSAWG] Adding Joe Clarke as a chair.

Hi Joe, Congratulations and welcome aboard! Cheers, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joe Clarke > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:09 PM > To: Warren Kumari; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adding Joe Clarke as a chair. >

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-06 Contributions, Status and Plans

t; From: t.petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 12:57 AM > To: Tianran Zhou; Ignas Bagdonas > Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-tac...@ietf.org; > opsawg-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-06 Contributions, Status > and Plans &

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-06 Contributions, Status and Plans

> -Original Message- > From: Alan DeKok [mailto:al...@deployingradius.com] > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 1:40 AM > To: t.petch > Cc: Tianran Zhou; Ignas Bagdonas; IETF OOPSAWG; > draft-ietf-opsawg-tac...@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-06 Contributions, Status and Plans

> -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 12:23 AM > To: Ignas Bagdonas > Cc: Douglas Gash (dcmgash); opsawg@ietf.org; ops-...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-06 Contributions,

[OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained-06

Dear OPSAWG, In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this service models explained draft. By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in

[OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10

Dear OPSAWG, The following draft was sent to IESG, but received some critical comments. Alternate Tunnel Encapsulation for Data Frames in CAPWAP https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10 Now the authors have addressed all the comments, and received confirmation from

[OPSAWG] OPSAWG IETF 100 Slot Requests

Dear WG, The IETF 100 Preliminary Agenda has been published, https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/agenda.html OPSAWG will meet 15:50-17:50 Tuesday Afternoon session II. Please send a request to Chairs for the time slot. Best Regards! Tianran, co-chair

Re: [OPSAWG] Post last call revision: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-02.txt

Great! Will work on the shepherd write up. Tianran > -Original Message- > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 5:28 AM > To: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org > Cc: opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Post last call revision: >

[OPSAWG] Move forward draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-02

Hi All, Thanks authors for incorporating all the comments during the WGLC. And we have received all responses to the IPR call. So let's move forward and request the publication. Please see the status information https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained/ Cheers,

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10

Hi WG, This call is concluded without objection on the revision. Let's move forward to IESG. Thanks, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 2:05 PM > To: opsawg@ietf.org

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-06.txt

We have applied the YANG doctor early review. And it's better to present current status of the draft on the coming meeting. So that we can get another round revision before the last call. Regards, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of

[OPSAWG] OPSAWG agenda posted

Hi OPSA WG and OPS area, We have posted the meeting agenda. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/agenda-100-opsawg/ Look forward to meeting with you on Tuesday. The authors please send your slides to the chairs. Thanks, OPSA WG Co-Chairs

Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC request for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-03.txt

Hi Zhenqiang and the coauthors, Based on your latest post, the co-chairs would like to suggest the following improvements before issuing the LC. 1. It's still not clear why the proposed IEs are necessary and useful, although you have some simple words in the introduction. It's better to add a

[OPSAWG] Consensus Call for IPR wrt draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-7

Hi WG, The authors updated the document based on the early review and WG discussions. Please see the latest revision: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community/ It's worth to notice the WG that this document contains an IPR disclosure. You can also find the file

Re: [OPSAWG] Consensus Call for IPR wrt draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-7

opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 5:44 PM > To: Operations and Management Area Working Group Discussion List > <opsawg@ietf.org> > Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] Consensus Call for IPR wrt > draft-ietf-opsawg-ip

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-li-opsawg-address-pool-management-arch-01

From: lichen@chinatelecom.cn [mailto:lichen@chinatelecom.cn] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 10:31 AM To: opsawg Cc: lichen.bri ; Tianran Zhou ; xiechf.bri Subject: 转发: New Version Notification for draft-li-opsawg-address-pool-management-arch-01 Hi all,   We have upda

Re: [OPSAWG] New Liaison Statement, "LS to IETF Operations and Management Area WG (OPSAWG) regarding use of MUD to indicate network usage requirements in cellular networks."

Hi Eliot, I feel this is an interesting work. What's your thoughts? Tianran > -Original Message- > From: Liaison Statement Management Tool [mailto:l...@ietf.org] > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 3:06 AM > To: Joe Clarke <jcla...@cisco.com>; Tianran Zhou <zhoutian...@

[OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community

Hi WG, The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community have posted the latest drafts to the mailing list, and believe that the document is ready for LC. This starts a 2 week WG LC on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04 Please read the above draft and send

[OPSAWG] CLOSED: WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community

> -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 11:07 AM > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community > > Hi WG, &

[OPSAWG] Call for presentation

Hi WG, The final agenda is published. The OPSAWG meeting is scheduled at 13:30-15:30, Monday Afternoon session I, Blenheim. Please send over your topics to the mailing list and/or the chairs, if you are going to discuss in the face to face meeting. Cheers, Tianran

[OPSAWG] Fwd: NomCom 2018: Call for nominations

Hi Folks, FYI /Tianran Forwarded Message Subject: NomCom 2018: Call for nominations Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:05:29 -0700 From: NomCom Chair 2018 Reply-To: i...@ietf.org To: IETF Announcement List CC: i...@ietf.org The 2018-19 Nominating Committee (NomCom) is seeking

[OPSAWG] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07

Tianran Zhou has requested publication of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the OPSAWG working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community

Re: [OPSAWG] request a presentation slot

Hi Haoyu, Thanks, noted. Tianran From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Haoyu song Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2018 2:54 AM To: opsawg Subject: [OPSAWG] request a presentation slot Dear OPSAWG chairs, I'm writing to request a slot to present the updates of the following

[OPSAWG] Preliminary Agenda for OPSAWG/OPSArea Meeting

Hi WG, The preliminary agenda for the face to face meeting is posted. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/agenda-102-opsawg-00 The speakers please send over your slides before the meeting. Thanks, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list

Re: [OPSAWG] IETF102: Submit your slides

It is also encouraged that the authours could send your slides earlier. So that people can preview and make comments. Cheers, Tianran Sent from WeLink 发件人： Joe Clarke 收件人： opsawgmailto:opsawg@ietf.org>> 主题： [OPSAWG] IETF102: Submit your slides 时间： 2018-07-12

[OPSAWG] Agenda on the joint OPSAWG and OPS Area meeting

Hi Folks, The agenda on the joint OPSAWG and OPS area meeting is published. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-opsawg.txt The authors please send over your slides to the chairs before the meeting. Cheers, Tianran and Joe

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-10.txt

Hi the Authors, I remember you posted a list of Alan's comments in the mailing list, and mentioned what have been addressed and how, what will be addressed later. I think it's a good start. Why not continue doing this for your new revision. It would be very helpful. Tianran > -Original

Re: [OPSAWG] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06

Hi Joel, > From what I can tell reading this, the value requires significantly more > precision than "region". As far as I can see, this document proposed a new aggregation parameter for IPFIX. So that the operators can get the traffic statistic from a new dimension. Because "Flow information

Re: [OPSAWG] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06

> iff i can select which community's or communities' values form the sampling > bucket(s), this seems reasonable. if i am community transparent, i probably > don't want a bucket for each community on my inbound set. Yes, this sounds better. It can be achieved by configuring the intermediate

Re: [OPSAWG] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-06

I think it worth the authors can discuss about this IPR in the WG before sending the draft to IESG. Tianran Sent from WeLink 发件人： heasley 收件人： li

Re: [OPSAWG] regarding draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community: IPR call

disclosure. 3. Ask the consensus again before sending to IESG. Thanks, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: Warren Kumari [mailto:war...@kumari.net] > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 4:52 AM > To: Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> > Cc: Tianran Zhou <zhoutia

Re: [OPSAWG] Asking for a slot for casm

Received. I will pencil your request on the agenda. Cheers, Tianran -- Sent from WeLink 发件人： 解冲锋 收件人： opsawg> 抄送： xiechf.bri> 主题： [OPSAWG] Asking for a slot

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

Hi Adrian, Thank you very much for your careful review and comments. On this discussion: "In 1.4 you have Since SNMP is poll-based, it incurs low data rate and high processing overhead. I don't think this is quite fair on SNMP. The protocol also includes Notifications allowing information

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

Behalf Of Randy Presuhn > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 8:38 AM > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf > > Hi - > > On 10/16/2018 8:08 PM, Tianran Zhou wrote: > > > 2. no customizable periodical and on-change exp

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

Hi Adrian, I see. Thank you very much for your suggestions. We will update the document to clarify this. Thanks, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 5:27 PM > To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org

Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf

18, 2018 12:51 PM > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Thoughts on draft-song-opsawg-ntf > > Hi - > > On 10/17/2018 6:37 PM, Tianran Zhou wrote: > > I do not mean to say the SNMP design is problematic. > > But I think it's not designed for periodically get

[OPSAWG] Conclude the poll//RE: WG adoption poll for draft-song-opsawg-ntf

the comments you got. Cheers, Tianran & Joe -邮件原件- 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou 发送时间: 2019年3月11日 10:40 收件人: opsawg@ietf.org 抄送: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org 主题: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-song-opsawg-ntf Hi WG, As you may have seen, the authors

[OPSAWG] FW: [104all] IETF 104 Preliminary Agenda

Hi WG, Please notice that the preliminary agenda is posted. The OPSAWG and OPS Area joint meeting is scheduled at 1350-1550 Afternoon Session I, THURSDAY, March 28, 2019. You can send your presentation proposal to the chairs or this mailing list for the slot. Cheers, Tianran as co-chair

[OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03

Hi WG, Accompany with the adoption poll, this mail starts the IPR poll. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03? If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03, please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF

[OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-song-opsawg-ntf

Hi WG, As you may have seen, the authors have posted an update to draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03 to address discussions in Bangkok and after. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ntf/ https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/g338UPfVAtOhVhdDzhJcR2nS76E In Bangkok there seemed to

Re: [OPSAWG] FW: [104all] IETF 104 Preliminary Agenda

Hi Shunsuke, Thanks. It's in my list. Cheers, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: Shunsuke Homma [mailto:homma.shuns...@lab.ntt.co.jp] > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 5:08 PM > To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] FW: [104all] IETF 104 Preliminary

[OPSAWG] OPSAWG & OPS Area preliminary agenda

Hi WG, The preliminary meeting agenda is posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/agenda-104-opsawg-01 Please notify the chairs if we missed something. The authors please send over your slides to the chairs. Look forward to seeing you in Prague. Cheers, Tianran & Joe

Re: [OPSAWG] OPSAWG & OPS Area preliminary agenda

Hi Roni, Sorry, I will put you on the list. Thanks, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: Roni Even (A) > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 4:07 PM > To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: RE: OPSAWG & OPS Area preliminary agenda > > Hi, > I asked

Re: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-song-opsawg-ntf-03

As listed contributor, I'm not aware of any IPR for this draft. Best regards, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 10:55 AM > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Cc: draft-song-opsa

Re: [OPSAWG] Network Telemetry Framework - new updates and request for adoption

Hi Tom, Here comes the clue :-) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ntf/ Cheers, Tianran -邮件原件- 发件人: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] 发送时间: 2019年3月8日 20:00 收件人: Haoyu song ; opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] Network Telemetry Framework - new

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-01.txt

Hi Haoyu and the authors, Thank you for the update on the NTF work. I see a lot of deep thinking wrt Telemetry. I have some comments after a quick reading. 1. While I understand why you put the details on "Existing Works Mapped in the Framework" to Appendix A. I think the "Requirements and

[OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04

Hi WG, This document was presented in Prague, and got good feedback. The authors have addressed all the comments. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi/ The chairs think this informational draft is easy to be implemented, and got good support. This email starts a two weeks

[OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04

Hi WG, Accompany with the adoption poll, this mail starts the IPR poll. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04? If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04, please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in compliance with

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt

Hi Qin and the authors, I think this is a valuable work as a comprehensive thinking on the model driven work in IETF. I am very interested on the architecture, the classification, the mapping methodology, etc. Some points may be useful: 1. When I am looking at the " Figure 1: An overview of

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt

> -Original Message- > From: Qin Wu > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 11:47 AM > To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: RE: I-D Action: > draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt > > Hi, Tianran: > -----邮件原件- > 发件人: Tianran Zhou >

[OPSAWG] FW: IETF 105 Preliminary Agenda

Hi WG, The preliminary agenda for IETF105 is published. The OPSAWG meeting is scheduled on WEDNESDAY, July 24, 2019, 1000-1200 Morning Session I. Please consider to submit your topic request for the time slot. We usually only have limited time for each topic. To efficiently use the time,

Re: [OPSAWG] Minutes for 104

Thanks Joe for the minute. I just add the missing part on NTF. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/minutes-104-opsawg-01 Cheers, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joe Clarke > (jclarke) > Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2019

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02

Hi Eliot, Thanks for your suggestions. Please see inline. Tianran From: Eliot Lear [mailto:l...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2019 8:13 PM To: Tianran Zhou Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; OpsAWG Chairs Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02 Hi Tianran, I have

[OPSAWG] FW: IPR poll on draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04

FYI From: Colin Doyle [mailto:cdo...@juniper.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 11:54 PM To: Tianran Zhou ; Warren Kumari Cc: OpsAWG Chairs Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04 Please forgive me. I'm new to this process and require a bit of hand-holding

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-sun-opsawg-sdwan-service-model-03.txt

Hi Bo, Very helpful to describe the difference between the OSE service model and this SD-WAN service model. A further question is why do you think the OPSAWG is the right home for the this service model when the OSE service model is working in RTGWG. I see you joined both drafts, I am

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02

. Please also address the questions raised during the poll and report on the meeting slot. Cheers, Tianran and Joe 发件人: OPSAWG [opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou [zhoutian...@huawei.com] 发送时间: 2019年7月7日 15:58 收件人: opsawg@ietf.org 抄送: OpsAWG Chairs 主题

[OPSAWG] OPSAWG & OPS area meeting agenda

Hi WG, The OPSAWG and OPS area meeting agenda is posted. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-105-opsawg/ Please feel free to email us if you have any question. If you have a slot, please send your slides to the chairs by July 22. Cheers, Tianran & Joe

[OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02

Hi WG, This email starts a 2 weeks working group adoption call for draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/ This document proposes a L3VPN Network Yang Model (L3NM) to facilitate communication between a service orchestrator and a

[OPSAWG] IPR poll on draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02

Hi WG, Accompany with the adoption poll, this mail starts the IPR poll. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02? If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02, please clarify whether this IPR been disclosed in

[OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02

Hi WG, This document was presented in Prague. The authors have addressed all the comments and believe it's ready for further working group discussion. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02 This email starts a two weeks poll for adoption. If you support adopting

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04

Hi WG, Now we conclude the poll and adopt this document as WG draft. Authors, Please republish draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04 as draft-ietf- opsawg-sdi-00 with only the date and file name changed. Cheers, Tianran and Joe -邮件原件- 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou

[OPSAWG] Preliminary agenda for OPSAWG & OPS Area

Hi Folks, The preliminary agenda is posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/agenda-106-opsawg-00 Please inform the chairs if there is any problem. The authors please prepare your presentation slides and send to the chairs before Nov 18. When preparing the slides, please

[OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09

Hi WG, On IETF 106 meeting, we saw predominant interest and support to this draft, especially from operators. The authors then resolved all the open issues. As requested by the authors, this email starts a 2 weeks working group adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09.

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09

Hi Benoit, My last question was only to check if there is enough interest on this work, not an adoption call. There was q after the presentation. And Joe cut the line because of the time. Now this is an adoption call. You are free to suggest or object. And we believe debate is really helpful.

[OPSAWG] Minutes on IETF 106

Hi WG, The minutes on OPSAWG Area meeting is posted. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-106-opsawg/ Please see if there is anything missing. Cheers, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] Comments for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-05.txt

> -Original Message- > From: Daniel King [mailto:d...@danielking.net] On Behalf Of > dan...@olddog.co.uk > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 4:14 AM > To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org > Cc: draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework.auth...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] Comments

Re: [OPSAWG] Comments for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-05.txt

> dan...@olddog.co.uk > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 4:14 AM > To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org > Cc: draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework.auth...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] Comments for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-05.txt > > Hi Tianran, > > Let me e

[OPSAWG] Hackathon on IFIT: In-situ Flow Information Telemetry

): lizhenbin at huawei.com -Tianran Zhou (Huawei): zhoutianran at huawei.com Project(s) -Implement the IFIT(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/) -Continue to implement the postcard based telemetry (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry

[OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-07

Hi WG, This email starts a 2 weeks working group adoption call for draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-07. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization/ This document provides a framework that describes and discusses an architecture for service

[OPSAWG] Conclusion//RE: WG adoption call for draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02

-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-00 with only the date and file name changed. Cheers, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2019 2:29 PM > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call f

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-02.txt

Hi Dmytro, Here is the important dates: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/important-dates/ Tianran 发件人: Dmytro Shytyi [mailto:ietf.dmy...@shytyi.net] 发送时间: 2019年10月18日 23:29 收件人: Tianran Zhou 抄送: opsawg 主题: RE: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-02.txt

Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-02.txt

Hi Dmytro, Thanks for your update. Now the agenda is not published. So we have not open the CFP. But I will record your request. Cheers, Tianran 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Dmytro Shytyi 发送时间: 2019年10月18日 22:30 收件人: Dmytro Shytyi 抄送: opsawg 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] New Version

[OPSAWG] CFP //FW: IETF 106 Preliminary Agenda

Hi WG, The preliminary agenda has been posted. The OPSA WG meeting is scheduled at: 10:00-12:00 Wednesday Morning session I, November 20. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/agenda.html We start to accept presentations. Please send over your request to the chairs. Look forward to seeing

  1   2   3   >