https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395121
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.10-5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393899
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
libdirq-0.4-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362490
--- Comment #28 from Jeroen van Meeuwen ---
(In reply to Jared Smith from comment #26)
> (In reply to Tim Flink from comment #25)
> > > MIT/X11 (BSD like)
> > > --
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394242
Bug 1394242 depends on bug 1394240, which changed state.
Bug 1394240 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Fast - Simple and very fast XML
to hash conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394240
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394250
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397030
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393021
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
pulledpork-0.7.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395121
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.10-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879740
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394240
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375765
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/yosys
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
Don Bayly changed:
What|Removed |Added
Group||intel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393899
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
libdirq-0.4-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #26 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) ---
I've also reported the PPC failure to the GCC folks:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78636
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #25 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) ---
I believe i've done what you've asked now. The output of rpmlint is below:
You wrote:
> - Don't need to execute ldconfig scripts.
However, this is generating rpmlint errors.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #28 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) ---
spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/elemental/Elemental/master/redhat/elemental-release.spec
srpm: https://rhl.fedorapeople.org/elemental/elemental-0.87.5-2.fc24.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #30 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Bundled jar/class files should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #31 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)",
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #27 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) from comment #25)
> I believe i've done what you've asked now. The output of rpmlint is below:
>
> You wrote:
> > - Don't need to execute
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #29 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #28)
> A question:
> ...
> install -p -D -m 755 build/tools/lib/%{pkg_name}-stress.jar
> %{buildroot}%{_javadir}/%{pkg_name}-stress.jar
> ...
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #28 from gil cattaneo ---
A question:
...
install -p -D -m 755 build/tools/lib/%{pkg_name}-stress.jar
%{buildroot}%{_javadir}/%{pkg_name}-stress.jar
...
%attr(755, root, root) %{_javadir}/%{pkg_name}-stress.jar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
--- Comment #7 from Brandon Nielsen ---
New spec URL:
https://bitbucket.org/nielsenb/mspgcc-fedora/raw/02c17fe25211ee2243391d146649d2a9b40bb203/msp430-elf-toolchain.spec
New SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400626
Bug ID: 1400626
Summary: Review Request: php-gecko-packages-gecko-php-unit -
Additional PHPUnit tests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400542
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
In the real world, only ragel depends on this package ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510
--- Comment #6 from Jared Wallace ---
1. You appear to be right :o Learn something new every day.
2. Awesome
3. Sounds good
4. If it builds on koji, that's sufficient for me. Not sure why Fedora-review
is failing,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879740
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
python-evdev-0.6.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394240
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-XML-Fast-0.11-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397030
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-libidn2-0.11-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400542
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> What going on with the .so file?
> $ objdump -p /usr/lib64/libcolm*|grep SONA
> SONAME libcolm-0.13.0.4.so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400542
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380942
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400542
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379830
--- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean ---
Unfortunately, py3 support is out of the question until fedmsg supports py3
(which is in turned blocked on certain x509 functionality being added to
python-cryptography upstream so we can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374947
Athmane Madjoudj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(athma...@gmail.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399833
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289717
--- Comment #20 from Ilya Gradina ---
new spec: https://github.com/neurofedora/ViennaCL/raw/master/viennacl.spec
new srpm:
https://github.com/neurofedora/ViennaCL/raw/master/viennacl-1.7.1-3.fc26.src.rpm
- fix license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
--- Comment #1 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267468
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Can you review bug 1399833 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379830
--- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean ---
OK, the following release should address all your other comments:
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SPECS/pdc-updater.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379830
--- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean ---
Here's a successful epel7 scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16699608
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397842
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #30 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) ---
done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399833
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399833
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397842
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cccolutils-1.4-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379830
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396790
terrycloth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(and...@tosk.in) |
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
create new SCM requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/9059
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395121
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.10-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380942
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jwebunit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399833
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #2)
> Review approved!
thanks!
> Comments:
> * Should use the lastest version
Done
> * Consider following the SourceURL package guideline for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #29 from Antonio Trande ---
Add
ExcludeArch: %{power64}
until PPC builds are fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
--- Comment #22 from Randy Barlow ---
Hey Jared! I looked at your third review and it looks good. The package is
approved, so the last step is that I need to sponsor you into the packager's
group. One thing that I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387873
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397643
--- Comment #10 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #8)
> (In reply to Honggang LI from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #3)
> > > In %description of utils use plural
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379830
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Actually, %python_provide should also be used.
Please add %{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%name}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396790
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Please run fedora-review on this package. It flags quite a few issues.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399648
--- Comment #4 from Yunying Sun ---
Besides, you may need to notify upstream with the "Free Software Fundation
Address" issue found by rpmlint:
xl2tpd.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/xl2tpd-1.3.8/LICENSE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397692
--- Comment #2 from terrycloth ---
Spec URL:
https://gitlab.com/terrycloth/packaging-gnome-shell-extension-activities-configurator/raw/master/gnome-shell-extension-activities-configurator.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400427
Bug ID: 1400427
Summary: Review Request: tasksh - Shell command that wraps
Taskwarrior commands
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400
--- Comment #16 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #14)
> I interpret the guideline as also replacing underscores in the name with
> dashes.
Well, it's useless if it's not clear.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400
--- Comment #17 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
> >SuperLU (and all other supernodal packages) are closer to upstream if they
> >are
> > named as they are now.
>
> I agree. Also,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399648
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400489
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1400184
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400489
Bug ID: 1400489
Summary: Review Request: perl-BSON - BSON serialization and
deserialization
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399648
--- Comment #2 from Petr ---
(In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #1)
> SPEC & SRPM can't be get directly from the URLs above. Web displays in
> Russian, and requires sort of confirmation to preceed with downloading.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #27 from Tomas Repik ---
Tramtadamtamtamtamt!
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/cassandra/v5/cassandra.spec
SRPM URL:
https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/cassandra/v5/cassandra-3.9-1.fc24.src.rpm
Koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362490
--- Comment #27 from Jeroen van Meeuwen ---
* Removed externals/jsonlint/ from the built RPM
* Changed the versioning to 0.$date.git$hash
Spec URL: https://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/phabricator/libphutil.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
--- Comment #20 from Jeroen van Meeuwen ---
Spec URL: https://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/phabricator/arcanist.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362491
--- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen ---
Spec URL: https://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/phabricator/phabricator.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510
--- Comment #5 from Guido Aulisi ---
Spec URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.2-3.fc24.src.rpm
Link to successful koji build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400542
Bug ID: 1400542
Summary: Review Request: colm - Programming language designed
for the analysis and transformation of computer
languages
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400542
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1382861
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400542
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||colm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392950
--- Comment #4 from Rafael Fonseca ---
Update addressing mentioned points:
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~rdossant/qclib.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~rdossant/qclib-1.2.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
Thank you for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391334
--- Comment #13 from Link Dupont ---
Quick followup on the rpmlint incorrect-fsf-address warning. The address listed
in the COPYING file appears correct. I'm not sure if it's a false positive
somehow coming out of rpmlint.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-Extract-Use-1.04-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391951
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
php-cs-fixer-1.13.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393934
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
php-http-interop-http-middleware-0.2.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395554
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398799
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpiredis-1.0.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396636
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-knieriem-markdown-0-1.git325ec6c.fc24 has been pushed to the
Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398929
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
brightnessctl-0.1.1_p2-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399648
--- Comment #3 from Yunying Sun ---
(this is an un-official review)
Besides inline comments(marked with yunying:), here are some additional:
1. "Group:" is not needed.
2. "rm -rf %{buildroot}" should be removed.
3.
97 matches
Mail list logo