Hi all,
I'm just attempting to install PacketFence on a RedHat Enterprise 6 server and
have run into the dependency problems laid out here:
http://packetfence.org/bugs/view.php?id=1319
The answer on the bug report states the PacketFence have updates the admin
guide with the following
I'm trying to install packetfence again, and with yesterday's new version being
available I'm now getting the errors below. Can anyone shed any light on what
I need to do please?
Error: Package: packetfence-3.0.3-1.el6.noarch (Packetfence)
Requires: perl-IPTables-Parse
Error:
Hi all,
I'm setting up PacketFence in a development network environment to trial it
against other vendors. Does anyone know if there is any issue with using the
Nessus homefeed for the test purpose, but then upgrading to the professional if
the system goes into the production environment?
).
But for all the others, what if you install EPEL?
On 11-11-22 7:07 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
I'm trying to install packetfence again, and with yesterday's new version being
available I'm now getting the errors below. Can anyone shed any light on what
I need to do please?
Error: Package: packetfence
://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/letter_p.group.html
On 11-11-22 8:12 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
EPEL is already installed.
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 22 November 2011 13:03
To:
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:packetfence-users
of the /etc/yum.repo.d/epel.repo file?
On 11-11-22 10:25 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Tried yum clean all. Still getting the error message.
Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: epel.
Please verify its path and try again.
Cheers,
Andi
From: Francois Gaudreault
-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Version 3.0.3 will not install, dependency
errors
Can you retry by uncommenting the baseurl line, and comment the mirrorlist line?
Do a yum clean all after. Then retry.
On 11-11-22 10:43 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
[epel]
name=Extra
Hi all,
After a bit of a struggle yesterday to get my packetfence installation working
I now have it installed and have run through the installer and configuration
script successfully.
However I get the following errors when I run service packetfence start
Starting PacketFence...Checking
Thanks for the very informative answer Francois,
So, would I be correct in saying that:
Internal - refers to the networks that the endpoints sit on, that Packetfence
controls the switchports of to configure vlans between, registration, isolation
and production/inline vlans.
Management - refers
Thanks all,
I've had this running through my head all night and I understand it a lot more
now. I'm sure this won't be the last question I have on here though ;)
Again, appreciate your patience.
Cheers,
Andi
From: Derek Wuelfrath [mailto:dwuelfr...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 23 November 2011 16:15
To:
I'm trying to setup radius to authenticate clients with my active directory
database so that I can utilise the 802.1x on the switches. However I've got to
the section where I need to add my server to the domain after configuring samba
and it is failing. I don't know whether it's related or
I'm trying to setup radius to authenticate clients with my active directory
database so that I can utilise the 802.1x on the switches. However I've got to
the section where I need to add my server to the domain after configuring samba
and it is failing. I don't know whether it's related or
...
On 11-12-06 6:52 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
I'm trying to setup radius to authenticate clients with my active directory
database so that I can utilise the 802.1x on the switches. However I've got to
the section where I need to add my server to the domain after configuring samba
and realm attributes.
Let me know if it works better.
On 11-12-06 10:50 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Ok cheers, here they are with domain names and IP addresses edited.
Krb5.conf:
[logging]
default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.logFILE:///\\var\log\krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.logFILE:///\\var\log
:40 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
No difference after editing the smb.conf as suggested.
Out of interest, should the realm and the workgroup be the same?
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 06 December 2011 16:14
To:
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:packetfence
it tells you?
On 11-12-07 4:02 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
I see, well in our case I have the two set the same, should this affect
anything? Samba is not telling me that the workgroup is wrong.
Cheers,
Andi
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 06 December 2011 16:57
been installed for
some reason.
Cheers,
Andi
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 07 December 2011 14:41
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Configuring radius with active directory
Interestingly testparm reported that it couldn't
-12-08 6:26 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
failed: Preauthentication failed
--
Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr
fgaudrea...@inverse.camailto:fgaudrea...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918
(x130) :: www.inverse.cahttp://www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nuhttp://www.sogo.nu
by default, you need to install it (samba-winbind).
On 11-12-08 9:35 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
A small update since my last post.
I ran:
net ads join -U usern...@domain.co.ukmailto:usern...@domain.co.uk
createcomputer=Servers/SCS
and got prompted to enter username's password, then got back:
Using short
/ntlm_auth --request-nt-key --username=%{%
{Stripped-User-Name}:-%{mschap:User-Name:-None}} --challenge=%
{mschap:Challenge:-00} .nt-response=%{mschap:NT-Response:-00}
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 08 December 2011 14:50
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re
Thanks Francois,
Apologies but I'm not sure what you mean there. Do you mean replace the .
before nt-reponse with a --? If so then I've just tried that and the error
remains the same. If you meant something else could you please clarify?
Also the closing } bracket is there, it just didn't
-08 11:06 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Thanks Francois,
Apologies but I'm not sure what you mean there. Do you mean replace the .
before nt-reponse with a --? If so then I've just tried that and the error
remains the same. If you meant something else could you please clarify?
Also the closing
] Radius server ignoring requests from known
switch
Andi,
Do you have the packetfence-freeradius2 package installed? Did you change the
db credentials in /etc/raddb/sql.conf?
On 11-12-09 8:42 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
I have configured a Cisco 3550 to connect via dot1x to the packetfence server
I suggest option 1.
On 11-12-09 9:39 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Oh this is highly confusing. I rebooted my packetfence server just now, and
now I cannot start radius at all. This is possibly due to me running a yum
update last night.
The errors I get when trying to start radiusd -X now
I'm trying to configure Packetfence so that fairly standard Nessus and Snort
rules are reported as violations. Things like lack of antivirus software as an
example of a Nessus rule, and infected traffic for snort rules. However I
cannot seem to find a sensible place to find these violation
Hi,
Is there any way using Packetfence to redirect the user's browser to a specific
webpage once they are registered and on the network? We would like our users
to see the student portal each time they open their browser.
Cheers,
Andi
From 1st November 2011
Sallee
Godfather of Bandwidth
System Engineer
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
900 College St.
Belton, Texas
76513
Fone: 254-295-4658
Phax: 254-295-4221
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 6:05 AM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
-users] Production vlan URL redirect
GPO with a forced home URL in IE? :P
On 12-01-10 10:33 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Ah that's a shame, I'm not planning on using Packetfence as an inline device.
Thanks,
Andi
From: Sallee, Stephen (Jake) [mailto:jake.sal...@umhb.edu]
Sent: 10 January 2012 15:04
The switchport needs to be in trunk mode, and put your management vlan as the
native vlan:
switchport trunk native vlan 703
Then use eth0 to set the management ip address.
On 12-01-13 9:11 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
On 01/13/12 08:21, Morris, Andi wrote:
Thanks Francois, those were ideas I hadn't
Cheers for your help Bill and Francois.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Arlofski [mailto:waa-packetfe...@revpol.com]
Sent: 13 January 2012 15:19
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] dot1x authenticating, but no ip address
On 01/13/12 10:09, Morris
I'm trying to enable soh on my dot1x clients. I have the client configured for
NAP, and have edited the eap.conf file, uncommenting the two lines as per the
admin guide, then restarted the radius service. However I get a 404 not found
when trying to access https://admin_ip:1443/soh
Does
Is there an easy way to tell what version I'm running (sorry for the stupid
questions!)
-Original Message-
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 13 January 2012 17:01
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] SOH
I thought I
:21
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] PacketFence upgrade [WAS: SOH]
On 13/01/12 12:01 PM, Morris, Andi wrote:
I thought I was, but I'm just checking now. Yum update packetfence suggests
that I'm up to date.
If you installed by following our guides
Hi again all,
I'm trying to configure a passthrough so that users in the registration vlan
can access a website in order for them to download a tool to configure their
dot1x settings. I have the following in my pf.conf:
[trapping]
#
# trapping.range
#
# Comma-delimited list of address
Hi all,
Since enabling SoH and creating a violation for no antivirus my clients no
longer get authenticated via radius. Commenting out the two soh lines in the
eap.conf and restarting the radius service results in authentication working
again.
The first thing I found from running in debug
Are there any more thoughts on why my passthroughs are not working?
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 18 January 2012 14:54
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Passthrough list not working
netsh nap client set enforce id=$ID admin=enable
On 12-01-20 11:04 AM, Francois Gaudreault wrote:
Hi Andi,
What PacketFence tells you in its log?
On 12-01-20 10:33 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi all,
Since enabling SoH and creating a violation for no antivirus my clients no
longer get authenticated via
Will do, it is working well with Windows 7 at the moment, and from googling it
appears that Vista is also the same ID. I'll just give it a go with as many OS
flavours as possible and see what happens.
Cheers,
Andi
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 23 January 2012
Hi Francois,
Here are the results of the snmp walk for the ifindex oid:
MIBNameOIDType Value
RFC1213-MIB ifIndex.1 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1 Integer 1
RFC1213-MIB ifIndex.2 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.2 Integer 2
RFC1213-MIB
;
}
Restart PF afterward.
On 12-01-24 10:39 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi Francois,
Here are the results of the snmp walk for the ifindex oid:
MIBNameOIDType Value
RFC1213-MIB ifIndex.1 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.1 Integer 1
RFC1213-MIB ifIndex.2
Hi Olivier,
Hopefully this should be more than enough information for you:
Cisco IOS Software, C3550 Software (C3550-IPBASE-M), Version 12.2(50)SE,
RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 27-Feb-09 23:46 by weiliu
Image text-base: 0x3000, data-base:
Hi again all,
I have since noticed that although the vlan switch is working properly now, the
progress bar still times out and the user is presented with Unable to detect
network activity. If they manually open a new window then access does as it
should, suggesting that the redirection is not
. Did you try with another browser (like Chrome)?
On 12-01-25 11:38 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi again all,
I have since noticed that although the vlan switch is working properly now,
the progress bar still times out and the user is presented with Unable to
detect network activity
Hi all,
Since yesterday my PF server has stopped authenticating users. The only things
that I can think may be related are:
- A week or so back I added a new DNS server into the PF development
network, and changed all the relevant entries that I could think of in the PF
config.
:43
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Radius no longer authenticating users
Rejoin the machine to the domain and it should fix it.
On 12-01-27 8:54 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi all,
Since yesterday my PF server has stopped authenticating users. The
only
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Radius no longer authenticating users
What about adding an entry in your /etc/hosts file:
domain.local 192.168.110.34
That way you will be able to use your external DNS.
On 12-01-27 10:15 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
I understand
Andi,
And you see the proper IP on the PC right? When you open a new tab, you can
browse without problem?
On 12-01-26 10:54 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi Francois,
Since e-mailing I have noticed that there is a bug logged about the
redirection for IE. However, the two browsers I tried were IE8
Thanks Francois.
I had no idea that the lack of internet would affect the way Packetfence would
work in that way. I'll do my best to get internet access piped over to my dev
network today to resolve that issue.
Regarding the isolation network being in the trapping range, I did wonder about
Ah, I see, I actually had that set to the management interface of the
packetfence server. I need to try and figure out the routing so that I can
allow access to one IP from several different production vlans, but that sounds
perfectly feasible.
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Francois,
This has confused me, I cannot see any reference to an unreg vlan in the
switches.conf, nor the admin guide.
I do have a registration vlan and isolation vlan declared on the default
switch, for some reason when I copied and pasted the switches.conf below it
didn't put the top
the violations after
updating/changing the filters?
On 12-02-10 5:36 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi Francois, thanks for looking into this.
Here is the debug output, it is quite long sorry. The processes that were
taking place during this time were:
Power on registered laptop
Plug in network cable
Hi all,
Is there a way for the radius server to ask for the username/password
combination again if the user gets it wrong? By default it seems to just fail
them outright, and the only way I can see of getting the prompt to re-occur is
to pull the network cable and plug in again, or reboot the
Did the files given shed any light on these violations retriggering?
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 15 February 2012 10:33
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Violations retriggering
your tests (service packetfence restart).
Thanks.
On 12-02-20 8:35 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Did the files given shed any light on these violations retriggering?
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 15 February 2012 10:33
Hi Jakee,
Currently we're looking to use the SoH to cover the MS users, and snort
violations to monitor the network for other threats. I'm no Apple fan, but I
know that the only virus trouble we've seen on our network has been from MS
operating systems, so we figured that this was the best
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Autoregistration, customise redirect page
Hi Andi,
On 03/01/2012 09:58 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi all,
I've realised that authenticating users via dot1x negates our need for
them to register their devices, at least for our purposes, so with the
help
Hi,
Has anyone successfully setup a WLC 5500 in packetfence? I would very much
like to get one working, but the documentation for the 4400 is to be
contributed, and there is also no option to add the 5500 in the switches
interface. Is this something that would be possible?
Cheers,
Andi
.
Thanks.
On 12-03-12 7:08 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone successfully setup a WLC 5500 in packetfence? I would very
much like to get one working, but the documentation for the 4400 is
“to be contributed”, and there is also no option to add the 5500 in
the switches interface
: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 12 March 2012 15:56
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Cisco Wireless Lan Controller 5500
AHA! (Sort of) solved it.
By removing the option to validate server certificate on the client's wlan
connections
If SoH is enabled is this supposed to still allow connections from Mac OS? My
Mac is currently failing to authenticate and when I check the radius logs I can
see that it is failing the SoH. Removing SoH from the eap.conf allows the Mac
to connect.
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
using unlang.
Thanks.
On 12-04-04 4:53 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
If SoH is enabled is this supposed to still allow connections from Mac OS?
My Mac is currently failing to authenticate and when I check the radius logs
I can see that it is failing the SoH. Removing SoH from the eap.conf allows
Hi all,
I have PF configured to auto-register users than connect via dot1x, and this
works a treat, however when they get successfully registered they are prompted
with another balloon asking them to click to open a browser window, which is
confusing when this step is being taken care of by our
the progress bar, then get
redirected successfully.
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 11 April 2012 19:16
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Extra dot1x balloons
Oh yes, of course. Apologies I
Hi all,
I'm just configuring our live servers (been on a dev network until now). I set
everything up following the admin guide, and everything was going well and I
could access the web interface successfully. Until I started to customise the
pf.conf and setup freeradius on the box.
.
Cheers,
Andi
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 19 April 2012 10:49
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Packetfence-users] New install of v3.3, freeradius issues
Hi,
I've done a fresh install of v3.3 and used the packaged
packetfence-freeradius2, but my
We are rolling dot1x out in our halls of residence over the next few months.
The switches we are using don't really play nicely with MAB (Cisco 2950). I
currently have a call on hold with the PF guys, which I'm going to open up
again once I have my live servers in, but I think the idea is to
Apologies, I've just found it in the FAQ.
Andi
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 25 April 2012 15:38
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Packetfence-users] Allow helpdesk staff access to areas of webadmin
Hi,
I'm trying to find where in the admin guide
I believe the part you need to edit in the radius.pm is:
my $radiusServers = [
{ 'host' = 'server1:1819', secret = 'secret' },
Change server1 to your servername, and add the secret
Cheers,
Andi.
From: Adrian Mulgrew [mailto:adrian.mulg...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 April 2012 16:46
To:
Thanks Francois,
Removing the mschap.bkp file solved the problem.
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 24 April 2012 14:04
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] New install of v3.3,
Hi all,
I'm starting to get to the point now where I'm looking to implement the snort
IDS that packetfence ties integrates with but I have a question regarding the
way that the violations are triggered.
I'm fairly sure I understand how snort and packetfence integrate:
Snort contains several
by WISPr, and it's a feature...
On 12-07-02 6:48 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi all,
Hopefully a relatively simple one, but I can’t seem to find an answer
anywhere else.
I’d like to add a DNS entry to the captive portal for www.apple.com
http://www.apple.com and set it to 0.0.0.0 which
HI Mark,
You need to specify the new certificates in /pf/conf/ssl-certificates.conf I
believe.
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Mark Holmes [mailto:mark.hol...@nuffield.ox.ac.uk]
Sent: 04 July 2012 16:37
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PacketFence-users]
Thanks Francois that's very helpful. We are already seeing lots of users
connecting to our open registration SSID but never registering, and the system
isn't even live yet, so I'd imagine that number will only increase and
eventually it will be very impractical to delete the nodes from the web
Hi all,
I'm having trouble getting my packetfence services to start since yesterday and
I'm unsure why. The only thing I changed yesterday was to add a cron job to do
a sql dump and a copy of the conf and /etc/raddb folders over to a windows
server each night. I did the exact same thing to
Message-
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 13 July 2012 11:25
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PacketFence-users] starting packetfence services
Hi all,
I'm having trouble getting my packetfence services to start since yesterday and
I'm unsure why
Hi all,
Just a minor suggestion for a feature really. How about a name field for the
switches.conf? Currently I add the switch name as a comment in the file, but
it would be very very handy to be able to see this information in the web gui.
Even more so if this information could somehow be
Hi all,
I've noticed recently that PacketFence isn't populating the OS Class field like
it used to. Is the information for this field taken from having the PF server
as the last ip helper address of the production vlans? My packetfence servers
are always the last ip helper entry for each
Hi all,
Somehow I've confused myself with the required gateway addresses for the
network cards in my packetfence server.
Is this correct?
In my pf.conf file these are set to the actual gateway for each vlan.
In my networks.conf file the gateway and dns for the registration and isolation
Thanks Francois,
I think the confusion came because it seemed to work no matter what I put for
the gateway field in pf.conf, so the snort template thing would explain it.
Cheers for your help,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 31
You were absolutely right Francois, this was actually a problem with how a
secondary radius server is configured on the switch.
Cheers for your reply and apologies for the noise on the list.
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 02
Hi all,
A curious one today, last Friday my nodes tab on the web interface was
populated with device names and OS type retrieved from the DHCP listener,
however the new registrations that came in over the weekend and today are not
populating these fields, bar one exception.
It's happening
Looks like a restart of the DHCPlistener service resolved this easily enough.
Cheers,
Andi
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 03 September 2012 13:43
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PacketFence-users] DHCP listener information disappared
Hi all
Hi all,
No doubt some of you will have seen that FreeRadius announced a new version
yesterday (version 2.2.0) and with it a security exploit found in the previous
version (version 2.1.12). Is there any foreseen issues with running an upgrade
on the pre-packaged version of freeradius that is
Hi all,
I'm seeing a lot of repeated warnings in my packetfence.log and I just want to
double check that they can safely be ignored. Everything appears to be working
ok.
An example of the two types of warning I regularly see are below. The IP
address has been doctored from the original.
1)
?) but I expect there is a
reason for that.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 18 September 2012 10:04
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence.log warnings
Hi all,
I'm seeing a lot of repeated
than the ones configured on
your WLC
- There is an ACL between PF and your controller that would block port 3799
You should investigate tcpdump and using the debug functions on the controller.
Thanks.
On 2012-09-18 6:19 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Cheers Mark, that's reassuring.
As for point 2
another IP than the ones configured on
your WLC
- There is an ACL between PF and your controller that would block port 3799
You should investigate tcpdump and using the debug functions on the controller.
Thanks.
On 2012-09-18 6:19 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Cheers Mark, that's reassuring
Thanks. I think when I get an opportunity I'll update the server from 3.3.2 to
the latest version, and see if I'm still getting the warnings.
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Bilodeau [mailto:obilod...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 19 September 2012 15:05
To:
Hi again all,
I'm now seeing the following in my packetfence.log. It's happened a few times
today and I've manually restarted the DHCPlistener process in the admin GUI
each time I've seen it. I can't tell if it stops anything working, but it
happens every few hours.
Sep 20 16:45:40
it a go.
Cheers,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Bilodeau [mailto:obilod...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 20 September 2012 16:54
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] more packetfence.log warnings
Hi Andi,
On 09/20/2012 11:48 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
Hi again
Hi all,
In the admin guide it mentions that a logrotate script is given in the addons
folder, and this should be added to the existing logrotate jobs if required. I
have added the script to the bottom of my logrotate.conf file, but upon further
investigation the packetfence logs seem to be
I'm also very interested in the methods people use for PF HA. At the moment I
just have a spare PF box configured and ready to switch on should the primary
fail, but it's on my to-do list to get a proper HA setup. It's interesting to
ready that people aren't happy with the failover with DRDB.
Ah I'm not sure. I'm not using inline mode. I have it working ok but not in
inline mode.
From: st3fan0 ste [mailto:st3fan...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 12 December 2012 14:48
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Allowing some sites past captiveportal
this
Hi all,
I have a user that has registered their device under a username including the
domain prefix, including the backslash. This has resulted in us not being able
to edit the node details (we need to force it to unregistered to re-setup the
device). The error I see when trying to edit is:
Hi all,
I have a fresh installation of version 4.0.1 on RHEL 6.4. All was going
swimmingly and my open setup network was pushing users to the Packetfence AUP
acceptance page as it does out of the box.
In previous versions what I have done is edit the
/ but keeping any
trailing paths.
Anyone have any ideas why this is happening?
Cheers,
Andi
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 29 May 2013 16:15
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PacketFence-users] Captive portal passthroughs not working
Hi all,
I have
I'm looking to implement a new Packfence deployment on another part of our
network, to mimic the one we setup for the halls of residence last year with
great success. However I've setup version 4.0.1 and struggled to get proxy
passthrough to work to allow users to the setup pages when trapped
] Version 4.0.1 and proxy passthrough
Hello Andi,
you can try the actual devel version, it's the release candidate.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2013-06-28 13:16, Fabrice DURAND a écrit :
Hello Andi,
it is include in the coming 4.0.2 version.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2013-06-28 12:02, Morris, Andi a écrit :
I'm
=crl.comodoca.com,ocsp.comodoca.com,oursetupurl.uni.com
Obviously with our own setup URL, not the one above.
I just get redirected back the capitive portal whenever I try to visit the
setup site.
Can anyone please advise?
Cheers,
Andi
From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent
That's great news. Thanks.
From: Ludovic Marcotte [mailto:lmarco...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 22 July 2013 12:25
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Version 4.0.1 and proxy passthrough
On 2013-07-22 4:22 AM, Morris, Andi wrote:
I now have 4.0.2 running, and I'm
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
