On 03/19/2011 02:59 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
--- On Sat, 3/19/11, dmotdinaudi...@simplesuperlativ.es wrote:
Still I believe Ardour has had limited contributors to the
code, so if they wished to band together as a copyright
collective they would be well within their rights to create
a
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:17:28AM +1100, Rich E wrote:
libpd will make a complete instance of Pd available inside of another
application, but it does not deal with instantiating single objects.
libpd does (handle instantiating patches) as of about 2 weeks ago. It
maintains the $0
Hi,
I, too, would recommend sssad. However the crashing most likely is not a bug in
Memento! All similar crash reports I received so far were related to conflicts
in [pool] or in wrong [prepend]s being used. Memento does not use [prepend]
anymore, and any crashes with [pool]/pd-extended are
Sorry, if I miss-filed the report (never filed one before).
To re-phrase the problem; [pix_film] would neither accept filenames with a
$1 in them or a %s. In my case [pix_film] has consistently accepted
filenames relative to the patch's folder, relative to Path however I have
had no such success.
Hi peeps,
Wondering if anyone has experience of using Codeblocks to compile an
external for Windows?
Lorenzo Sutton has very kindly forwarded me an external he has made for quad
panning using Chowning's methodology which I really like.
In the package he forwarded to me, he says that all the code
I algorithmically generated and loaded files into pix_film on OSX millions
and millions of times using 'open $1' without error. It would be helpful to
see what your filenames look
like.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sonia yuditskaya marysgh...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry, if I miss-filed the
Julian,
I sent you a 'windows' zip with the project and already compiled dll
answering to your previous private email... I had to re-send as I got a
google network error hope it arrived allright.
Anyway I'll write here what I know for further reference on the list.
(This worked on windows
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, sonia yuditskaya wrote:
To re-phrase the problem; [pix_film] would neither accept filenames with
a $1 in them or a %s.
No, [pix_film] does accept any symbol. Once the $1 has been processed by
the messagebox, it is no longer a $1 (in the output of the messagebox).
And
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Bernardo Barros wrote:
2011/3/18 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca:
already. Then the only way to get a reward for having done work that hasn't
been asked for, is always in terms of how much it will get people to offer
you money for future work. Perhaps there ought to be
2011/3/19 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca:
I don't understand what you mean. Future work is future. It's not like
rewarding past efforts. A past effort doesn't imply feature requests going
to the same person and implementing those features doesn't constitute a
reward for past efforts.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Apologies for potential cross-posting--tried sending this via
pd-announce but for some reason it never made it there...
If you are looking at the pipermail archives on the web, those archives
aren't up to date. For example, last recorded pd-list
2011/3/19 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca:
Any investment in free software is an investment in all corporations that
use free software, regardless of how they use it. Very few corporations that
use free software make proprietary forks. Proprietary forks aren't the only
way corporations can
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Hello , Mathieu! Well, I did not refer to implementation of new
features, but the maintenance of that code that already works, fixing
bugs.
Ok, so, basically, buggy software gets rewarded for requests to fix bugs.
Bugless software is not rewarded
*...INTERnational interLAB interNET..
Live ExperiMENTAL noise jam stream
Confirmed SPACES:
BCN -- La Rimaia
Berlin -- Emitter19
Budapest -- Kaszino2010
Zurich -- dock18
NYC -- ?
*
There is an international noise conspiracy underway.. Noise artists from
different spaces and labs
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Bernardo Barros wrote:
How the donation will be spitted, that's up to the donator and the main
developers to decide. I would like to choose witch sub-projects I would
like to donate, or if I would like to contribute to the whole project
sharing in direct proportion to the
2011/3/19 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca:
And how do you measure the proportion of money that should go to each
developer in a project ? Take for example pd-vanilla : Miller gets what
percentage of the donations ?
I don't know. Let the donator choose?
On 2011-03-19 15:34, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Ok, so, basically, buggy software gets rewarded for requests to fix
bugs. Bugless software is not rewarded : it does not pay. Therefore we
are encouraged to put enough bugs in there so that we get money.
Nevermind the high-reliability ideals.
That
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Bernardo Barros wrote:
2011/3/19 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca:
And how do you measure the proportion of money that should go to each
developer in a project ? Take for example pd-vanilla : Miller gets what
percentage of the donations ?
I don't know. Let the donator
Specifically, the *only* function missing from the non-donation OSX
version of Ardour is support for AudioUnit plugins on the Mac. I have
no problem with the Ardour model of distribution, and AFAIK you can
still use your package manager in almost any Linux distro to avoid
even being asked to
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, David Guy John wrote:
The idea is that python starts up an instance of PD which will choose
patches at random from a list. It loads a patch up, plays it for 10
minutes then crossfades over to another randomly chosen patch. There are
currently 20 patches on there the vast
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Cody Loyd wrote:
Personally this concept is going to be very very useful to me, and I'm
proud that I thought of it on my own. So, what do you think? PLEASE
PLEASE share any improvements that you might have to this design :)
error: pack: i: bad type
because atom type i
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Andy Farnell wrote:
This is pure superstition and folklore, but I'm sure it had something to
do with using [knob] objects. Just a feeling in my bones.
Well, that's possibly a very good guess. Now if only someone could look at
[knob]'s code, to find out what might be wrong
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Antonio Roberts wrote:
Thanks for the advice! I've sent it to the pure data forum as well.
As GEM crashed often for me (using an ATI card) I instead used:
[#to_pdp]
Btw someone (buzz) reported that [#to_pdp] would only produce a single
frame, as it would get stuck with
Thanks for sharing this. I like the patch. I think it would be interesting to
replace the osc~ based sound generation by a sample reading system. For
instance, you could fill a folder with samples named 000 to 999 and use
readsf~ to play them in sequence by telling it to open/start
H, i your project catched my attention because I was wondering lately how one
could record interesting human body sounds. Could you give me some details
about you microphone technique for this project?
Thanks a lot.
D.S
http://www.flickr.com/photos/schafferdavid/
sorry, my following reply sat a long time in my email account.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, ailo wrote:
I guess what I meant was, can we define music generally so that everyone
can agree on what is the definition of music?
Well, if «everyone» also includes those people who purposefully want you
to
Oh no, not again...
2011/3/19 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
sorry, my following reply sat a long time in my email account.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, ailo wrote:
I guess what I meant was, can we define music generally so that everyone
can agree on what is the definition of music?
Many people have speculated that if we knew exactly why the
bowl of petunias had thought that we would know a lot more
about the nature of the universe than we do now.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:34:15 +0100
Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh no, not again...
2011/3/19 Mathieu
ROTFL ! But personally, I'd rather bet on the spermwhale.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Andy Farnell wrote:
Many people have speculated that if we knew exactly why the
bowl of petunias had thought that we would know a lot more
about the nature of the universe than we do now.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011
--- On Sat, 3/19/11, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Subject: Re: [PD] Am I alone?
To: ailo ailo...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Saturday, March 19, 2011, 11:27 PM
sorry, my following reply sat a long time in my email
account.
Mathieu, a fun-fact note on recent spermwhale research
- http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/03/sperm-whale-names/
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/03/sperm-whale-names/Probably they
know a lot :)
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.cawrote:
ersonally,
Oh, cool, I wasn't aware of that. Can you tell a bit more about the
performance
of this approach and how it compares to dynamic patching for dynamic
instantiation
of objects/patches?
Ciao
--
Frank BarknechtDo You RjDj.me? _ __footils.org__
Initial
I am just a lowly Pd user, not a dev. How would I use libpd? Does it work
just like Pd, but embeddable in other devices? or are we talking lines of
code?
thanks
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Rich E reakina...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, cool, I wasn't aware of that. Can you tell a bit more about
--- On Sat, 3/19/11, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Subject: Re: [PD] The economics of Open source
To: Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Date: Saturday, March 19, 2011, 8:34 PM
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011,
34 matches
Mail list logo
