Hallo all!
Continuing the thread, I digged out the slides that I shot using my MZ-M.
The exposure seems quite accurate. However, in two cases, it overexposed
the frame. This is happening probably because 2-segment multipattern
metering is close to centerweighted metering. To check this point
I'm in love. Peter knows why - delivery arrived today (thanks).
Just holding it is a wonderous thing. Havent had time to use it yet,
but I just know I'm gonna be hooked.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
I know that this has been gone through before butI am confused,
so could someone please explain HOW to 'calibrate'.
Also are you 'calibrating' the camera/film combo
or can you 'calibrate'the camera seperate from the film?
Alan
Herb said,
all of the advanced books on photography i have read
I know that this has been gone through before butI am confused,
so could someone please explain HOW to 'calibrate'.
Also are you 'calibrating' the camera/film combo
or can you 'calibrate'the camera seperate from the film?
The easiest way is to alter the ISO setting to your favour, although I
Steve.
Well done on persuading them to lend something decent. For my part I can
offer loans on
14mm F3.5 Sigma
24-35mm F3.5
24-40mm F2.8 ATX Tokina or Ricoh
35mm F2 AL
35-70mm F2.8/3.5 M
35-105mm F3.5A
50mm F1.4 FA
100mm F2.8 A
100mm F4 M
105mm F2.5 V. S1
135mm F2.8 IF
300mm F4A*
300mm F4 M
Hi Alan,
Can you explain in more detail?
If I take a picture of a Kodak grey card in bright sunshine (say) and then
compare the slide
how do I know that I am not being fooled by the 'characteristics' of the
film rather then exposure?
I am sorry if this is obvious to you but it is not to
- Original Message -
From: Alan Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know that this has been gone through before butI am confused,
so could someone please explain HOW to 'calibrate'.
Also are you 'calibrating' the camera/film combo
or can you 'calibrate'the camera seperate from the film?
Alan
David, this sounds like bad news. The mechanical aperture coupling
on your PZ-1p appears to have shifted. Exposure should be affected
with all manual lenses. However, it should expose correctly with
F/FA lenses, as these transmit indeed the aperture value as part of
the digital
Eh... what? It's either too early in the morning or here must be some
sort of typo. Is it 85/1.4?
Best,
Mishka
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: FS: A* 85/1.8
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 22:01:14 -0700
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the
Shel,
Hurry back to good health!
I hope your troubles pass quickly.
Bob Sullivan
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Agreed.
Let me try to clarify what I am after.
If I buy a camera and assume that I know the 'characteristics of a film
(slide).
Is there any quantative way of testing the camera so that I know if it over
or under exposes?
How do I know that a picture taken that for example appears over exposed is
From my research this is the time were the most IR
waves are present.
Looking fwd to seeing some of the shots.I'm really
having fun shooting this medium and sounds like
you are too.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The evening/morning ones are
At 05:57 9-7-2002 -0400, you wrote:
From: Adrian Sorescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A big flaw of MX ,IMO : over/overexposure bigger thah +-1EV is not
signaled by the leds in a different way (lafhing) than exactly + EV.
Twist the aperture ring or shutter dial and start counting - bleah.
Hmm, wouldn't
Good luck. Sod the lenses and just get better - thats what really
matters even to nutters like us!!
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2002 06:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where oh where is Shel?
Hi gang,
I just wanted
Hi Rob,
on 09 Jul 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
Good luck. Sod the lenses and just get better - thats what really
matters even to nutters like us!!
ACK.
Get well soon, Shel. Best wishes from Germany!
Heiko
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Hi Wendy,
1/2 EV is readable with the MX body. If the under or over leds flash
with the centre led, it is 1/2 EV over or under (depending on the led of
course).
Bob
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, wouldn't exactly call that a big flaw.
I quite like my
The ZX-L does not offer center-weighted averaging.
The ZX-L manual says that the camera *does* offer center-weighted metering
on lenses other than A, F, and FA.
- Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Thanks for that info.
I can focus this camera without glasses,but not
with my glasses.All my other cameras be they mf or
af can be focused properly with or without glasses,except this
SP500.Very odd and i'm confused.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 08
Hope you get feeling better, Shel.
Doug
At 10:16 PM 7/8/02 -0700, Shel wrote:
Hi gang,
I just wanted to touch base and bring you up-to-date on my situation and
why I've not been around, and to apologize to a few folks for not having
shipped a few items in a timely fashion.
During the past
Hello everyone,
I am back from my canadian mini-vacation (Montreal jazz festival and
Ottawa -- I wish we had July 4th more often than once a year! ).
One thing got me curious. My main camera was MX, which has the longest
metered exposure of 1s and fastest film setting 1600, which sets the
limit
Thanks for your comments, Bernd. I know our tour hits Vigeland Park as part
of the half-day tour, but I think that's a place I will want to return to
later to have more photographic time.
HUDERER Bernd wrote:
for me a must for taking pictures in Oslo:
Vigeland Park
--
Daniel J. Matyola
I think Adrian was addressing the contrast evaluation rather than
the exposure adjustment. With just a 2 EV range (MX) it's difficult
to assess the scene contrast (usually more than 3 EV) just by
looking through the viewfinder and moving the camera around.
Modern PZ/ZX (Z/MZ) cameras
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know that this has been gone through before butI am confused,
so could someone please explain HOW to 'calibrate'.
Also are you 'calibrating' the camera/film combo
or can you 'calibrate'the camera seperate from the film?
Alan
shot a roll of
Good to hear you are on the mend.
Wishing you a quick return to good heath.
Otis
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi gang,
I just wanted to touch base and bring you up-to-date on my situation and
why I've not been around, and to apologize to a few folks for not having
shipped a few items in a
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that a lucky coincidence? Or is night time exposure almost
irrelevant (because of huge difference of brightness of lightsources,
one is almost guaranteed to get bright lights/black sky no matter
what)?
Any ideas?
Best,
Mishka
exposure is
Great to hear from you again.
Take care of yourself
Alan
At 10:16 PM 7/8/02 -0700, Shel wrote:
Hi gang,
I just wanted to touch base and bring you up-to-date on my
situation and
why I've not been around, and to apologize to a few folks
for not having
shipped a few items in a timely
Hello to all,
I just took delivery of a Pentax MX kit. It came with
a SMC M 28mm/f3.5, SMC M 50mm/f2.0, and a Vivitar
135mm/f3.5 plus a bunch of filters (2 80A, 2
Polarizers, 1 Orange 02 filter, and 2 UV filters). It
also came with 2 2x converters and three close-up
filters.
Looking over the
RS The AF200T is small but it has a fixed head, no rotation or elevation for
RS bounce, have you considered a Metz 32CT3 + SCA372? Just as small, more power
RS plus rotation and elevation?
RS Cheers,
RS Rob Studdert
Hi Rob,
it seems to me that a 32CT3 is bigger, no? At least comparing
Tuesday, July 09, 2002, 5:59:50 AM, Alan wrote:
I don't suppose I can plug a 5p cord directly into the head...I guess
I'll need another Off-Camera adapter F to mount it on a bracket?
AC Yes, unfortunately. However, I do not know how sturdy the whole setup would
AC be if there is a plastic
Thanks to everyone who replied.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Hi,
I have scanned few photos from my first roll of IR (although it's
just near-infra-red SFX tru a ~89A filter), and uploaded them to my
web. The photos were manipulated, some more, some less, by burning
and some dodging, nothing I wouldn't do in the darkroom. One reason
was to
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Joseph Tainter wrote:
The ZX-L is supposed to be a 5n replacement.
No, this is not true. ZX-L is a replacement for ZX-7.
The proof is at Pentax Japan web site: MZ-7 has been discontinued and no
longer listed; whereas MZ-3 and MZ-5n are still in production.
My son-in-law and myself are heading up to Grandfather Mountain Friday
morning to take in the annual Highland Games (
http://www.grandfather-mountain.com/events/gmhg.htm ). I'm looking forward
to burning lots of film and, weirdo that I am, observing the parade of
bagpipe bands. If any of you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Frankly, If the exposure can't be right on the money,
I'd rather have my negatives just slightly over exposed,
and my slides a bit under.
...
If you calibrate your camera's meter i.e. run some tests (on slides) and
record what is average 18% gray for your
Welcome back and good health to you, Shel. We were getting a bit
worried.
--
Kenneth Archer, San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Francis,
The DOF Preview button is the same as the Self Timer, but you move the top part of the
lever towards the body to activate.
Regards,
Jose R. Rodriguez
From: Francis Alviar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/07/09 Tue AM 09:01:13 CDT
To: Pentax Discuss List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
For DOF preview, push the self-timer lever toward the lens.
To use the self timer, cock the shutter, pull the lever around to the bottom, and the
press the button that was revealed when moving the lever. This will show you if the
self timer works.
Personally, I find the MX too small for my
Good luck. Sod the lenses and just get better - thats what really
matters even to nutters like us!!
I'll second Rob's sentiments! Get well, Shel.
Cotty
PS keep an eye on
http://www.macads.co.uk/pdml/
on this coming saturday - I have a nice idea.
:-)
Hello. I know the LX reigns supreme with regards to low light shooting, but does
anyone have any actual experience using the PZ-1P under low light conditions? If so,
please share your observation/opinion. Thank you.
Francis T. Knapik
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Had the professor phrased the question a different way, the student's answer
may not have been quite so sarcastic. The joke here was on the professor,
not the student.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:23 PM
I've read somewhere (print, on-line) that some Pentax
screwmount lens glass are turning yellow. What causes
this and which lenses are involved? And most
importantly, when the glass finally turns yellow is
the lens rendered unuseable or can I still use them
for certain applications (BW maybe)?
wb Nicely done, Frantisek.
wb Not too over the top.
wb The gallery looks really effective against the black, too.
wb I like the last one of the gallery - is that pond weed? The third one (top row,
far right) is nice too with the whispy cloud.
Thanks Wendy.
Not too over the top - I am still not
I have the SCA3000 cord. You take off the adapter from the flash, and
place the adapter in the cord and slide it on your camera's hotshoe.
The other end of the cord slides into the space for the adapter. This
part has a hot shoe shape and tripod thread, so you have two options of
supporting
That was *exactly* what I meant :)
I wish we had July 4th more often than once a year!
Reminds me of a story from my academic days. My employer, a fairly
new assistant professor of chemistry, asked one of his Indian
graduate students: Gopal, do you have the Fourth of July in India?
Ayash wrote, regarding my tale of my previous life:
And, what do you mean by that? Please explain.
Hi Ayash,
It was a ~joke~ that shows what a silly question the professor appeared to
have asked. Jokes about professors in graduate school are kind of like
jokes about bosses and management in
Let me guess, is that the digital SLR?
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 10:14, Rob Brigham wrote:
I'm in love. Peter knows why - delivery arrived today (thanks).
Just holding it is a wonderous thing. Havent had time to use it yet,
but I just know I'm gonna be hooked.
-
--
Frits J. Wüthrich
And i'm sure i can speak for all the Toronto
PDMLers,welcome back Shel and get well soon.
Dave et all
Begin Original Message
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:27:29 +0100
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Where oh where is Shel?
Good luck. Sod the
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 03:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious, does the DX coding system have any
information other than film speed? Does the DX encoding
tell it the type of film and would it overexpose all
types?
http://www.postkoets.btinternet.co.uk/links/dx/dx.html
I have a bad
If you think Petersen's Photographic and Shutterbug are great authorities, that may be
part of your problem. Did anyone see the MZ-S test in the May 2002 Shutterbug? It
seemed as if the tester hadn't used an auto-exposure camera before. He says Tv stands
for time priority (his quotes), and
I've got three manual Pentax bodies and the MX is my favourite by far. I
love the small size (with the 40mm pancake it's actually smaller than my
Voigtlander Bessa R rangefinder).
Unfortunately it's totally unusable in sunlight. The LEDs are all blacked
out, so I'm left with sunny 16. Find a
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have scanned few photos from my first roll of IR
[...]
Please critique and comment!
[...]
oops: the address: www.volny.cz/fotof/scapes/ir
It seems that you've managed better with your firs IR roll than I did.
Shel, welcome home! What goes around comes around and we all hope that you
rebound to great health and new lenses come your way 4 fold.
DG
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
I understand! Thanks guys.
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frits J. Wüthrich
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 400FTZ
I have
Frantisek,
Really like the shots. I played around with IR film way back in the
late 70's, I see I need to try it out again.
Mark
--
Gosdin Information Systems Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.O. Box 330 www.gosdin.net
Warner, OK 74469-0330
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank Knapik
Hello. I know the LX reigns supreme with regards to low
light shooting, but does anyone have any actual experience
using the PZ-1P under low light conditions? If so, please
share your
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
I can't let them go until my 2 500's come back from Pentax, which
*should* be this week.
They're back, so let me know if you want a 400 or 500...
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
Hi, Shel,
No thanks required. Your health is much more important than a silly old
lens. Glad to hear that you're on the mend.
take care,
frank
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi gang,
I just wanted to touch base and bring you up-to-date on my situation and
why I've not been around, and to
William wrote:
What turned you off to Gitzo?
They are ruined if dented. Due to their design with thight fit the slightest dent,
like when you drop your tripod, will make the legs jam. Besides, their ergonomics are
awful. The leg locks a pain and the rubber bands on the locks go wonky and
William wrote:
I have heard of problems with just about everyone's evaluative
metering systems having some flaws with slide film. They all
seem to overexpose somewhat in many situations.
The trick would be to set the meter to center weighted, if the
camera supports such a regressive
Joseph wrote:
Right. I made it all up. So have the other Pentax users who've posted on
this matter from time to time. In fact I think that the reviewers for
Shutterbug and Petersen's made it up too. Got you going, didn't we?
It is true that all entry level slr's have matrix metering systems
i have never had problems reading the meter LEDs with my MX in very bright
light, like high noon on a snowfield at altitude. i don't get it.
Herb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
stop pressyou're not going to believe thisHIGH PRESSURE due
over the UK on Saturdayweather should be bright and sunny...no, I
don't believe it either...
Believe it! Tally-ho Duxford!
:-)
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to
In a message dated 7/9/2002 3:37:47 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
He also praises the all-mode DOF, saying This is an improvement over the
PZ1-P and ZX-5n, which allow a stop-down preview only in the aperture
priority and manual modes. Don't they both allow DOF
Hi,
Later K1000's were indeed made in Hong Kong, as you mention, but were also made in
China, and (I believe) Thailand and/or Singapore, or some other Asian country. In
fact, at least one Chinese K1000
clone (Mingco, for one) is currently being made in a factory that Pentax licenced to
make
Hi, Francis,
This is apparently caused due to the fact that the glass elements were
made of rare earth elements, which over time decompose, depositing the
decomposed material on the glass surfaces.
Over at YahooGroups Spotmatic, one of the members actually took his 1.4
to a friend's/relative's
David, this sounds like bad news. The mechanical aperture coupling
on your PZ-1p appears to have shifted. Exposure should be affected
with all manual lenses. However, it should expose correctly with
F/FA lenses, as these transmit indeed the aperture value as part of
the digital
Ah...well, this is potentially good news. Pentax may yet bring forth a
capable medium-priced body to replace the 5n. I hope it will have a
center-weighted option that is as easily accessible as it is now on the
1p, 5n, and MZ-S.
Coming from manual focus background, I cannot think of any
Hi, Herb,
I certainly have problems reading the led's in bright sunlight. In fact, I
think it's the only criticism I have of my MX (well, the only major one,
anyway). The problem is at its worst when the sun is high in the sky, behind
me. It can be remedied by shading the eyepiece with my
Pat wrote:
He also praises the all-mode DOF, saying This is an improvement over the PZ1-P and
ZX-5n, which allow a stop-down preview only in the aperture priority and manual
modes. Don't they both allow DOF preview in all modes?
Actually, no.
I carry an incident meter, and almost every
Frank wrote:
Hello. I know the LX reigns supreme with regards to low light shooting, but does
anyone have any actual experience using the PZ-1P under low light conditions? If so,
please share your observation/opinion. Thank you.
Basically it sucks (like all modern cameras). When the light
A better winder motor would be nice. I'm worried that mine sounds like it's
trying very hard to advance the film...
Cory Waters
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax - New Directions (now
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: Pentax - New Directions (now getting longer)
William wrote:
I have heard of problems with just about everyone's
evaluative
metering systems having some flaws with slide film. They all
seem to overexpose somewhat in many
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if part of the problem is that I wear glasses, and
can't get my face
really close to the eyepiece? Do you wear glasses? Anyone
else notice a
correlation?
Hi Frank,
I do wear glasses and I think there surely is a correlation
between the
smcforme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious about the KX and K1000. I believe the K1000 could
be considered the direct descendant of the Spotmatic F. I know
the K series cameras are considered work horses, but I'm just
curious if they can be compared to the unquestionable
reliability of the
Frank Knapik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I know the LX reigns supreme with regards to low light
shooting, but does anyone have any actual experience using the
PZ-1P under low light conditions? If so, please share your
observation/opinion. Thank you.
Hi Frank,
It depends on how low are
Just purchased a used Manfrotto 055 tripod and a 136 head.
The tripod is awesome. Built like a tank, great for MF cameras.
The head, not realizing that it was for video cameras, seems like it's going
to be useless for my needs. It has the smoothest action I've seen on a
tripod, and it will hold
Coming from manual focus background, I cannot think of any improvement over
the MZ-3/5n, except a better viewfinder.
The lack of 1/2 stop shutter speeds in full manual mode (no numbers, just click stops
1/2 way in between). Some may also complain about the 2s maximum manual shutter
Sas, thanks for taking the time to comment on this image. Yes, mother nature
is great at arranging colors, all we have to do is see them.
Ken Waller
- Original Message -
From: Sas Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:00 AM
Subject: PUG favourites,
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, William Robb wrote:
Nikon and Minolta specifically. Not sure about Canon.
Who else has multi pattern metering?
Canon has had some problems with their metering lately, notably the severe
underexposure that the early Elan II's, EOS 3's, and Elan 7's (?) were
doing. I
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
The later K1000 were made in HK and feature plastic top and bottom
shells (metalized).
What do you mean by metalized? Do they have a thin coating of metal, or
are they just made to look/feel like metal?
chris
-
This message is from the
Thanks to everyone for their repplies. I will admit that the MX is out of
my price range for now, but I'd like to know if there other bodies (even
non-pentax) that will meet my needs, especially If these bodies can had had
for under $100 US.
-Scott
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
-Original Message-
From: tom
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:13 PM
-Original Message-
From: David Weiss
Hi all,
I believe there is a fairly popular list member who
has offered to develop film for list members. Are you
still out there?
I offered to develop b+w, but I'm
I think the build quality on the -5n could be a little better.
Feature-wise,
it's close to ideal.
But then if the built quality were better, wouldn't it be a higher class
model then? I think Pentax should drop the 5n and made the 3 as affordable
as the 5n, things would have been more perfect.
On Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:45:54 -0400, Amita Guha wrote:
We're probably going to honeymoon in the Finger Lakes in mid-late
October, and we're trying to figure out which lake to stay on. I'm
leaning towards Keuka since that's centrally located. We've already
been to Watkins Glen twice. Are there any
I don't wear glasses and have no problem seeing the MX LEDs in bright
sunlight.
The displays in the LX and the MZ-S, I find VERY difficult to see when it's
sunny.
I have found the display of LX is more likely to be disturbed than the MX
one. But the +/- 1EV LEDs of the MX is a bit limited
Hi gang!
Recently, Joe (Joseph Tainter) responded me privately and he reported that
it needed membership to open the webpage that I have mentioned in my
earlier mail. This is quite surprising as all of my friends and relatives
were able to view the webpage without any problem.
In that case,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
Ayash wrote, regarding my tale of my previous life:
And, what do you mean by that? Please explain.
Hi Ayash,
It was a ~joke~ that shows what a silly question the professor appeared to
have asked. Jokes about professors in graduate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cesar
Had a nice time shooting with the MZ-S and LXen this
weekend. I even shot
some ASA 3200 bw in a Greek restaurant where they
encourage people to dance
on the tables. I hope to get
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/9/2002 3:37:47 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
He also praises the all-mode DOF, saying This is an improvement over the
PZ1-P and ZX-5n, which allow a stop-down preview only in the aperture
I did notice today that the LED's are hard to see in
bright sunlight. The thing is the camera is so new to
me that it's not bothering me at all. Just enjoying
this nice little compact camera. On the other hand,
the lenses that I got are somewhat pretty well used
especially the 50mm/f2. The
90 matches
Mail list logo
